The conflict between the United States and Mexico fumed for years before it became a war in 1846-1848.

Understanding the true origins of the war, from disputes over borders to political instability, is shrouded
in mystery. At the same time, other historians argue that the United States deliberately orchestrated the
war for reasons of expansion. Other historians say that Mexico's actions and internal weakness provided
for a just cause for hostilities.

The belief that the United States had a God-given right to expand westwards fueled the desire for
expansion. According to one theory, the US administration may have planned the conflict. From the
writings and speeches of President James Polks, it is evident that he intentionally provoked the Mexicans
to war by sending troops into disputed territories, thereby creating a situation that could justify military
action. Polk wanted to acquire Mexican territory, particularly California and New Mexico and believed
that a war with Mexico would provide an opportunity to achieve this goal (Polk, 1845).

However, other historians contend that it was started for a legitimate reason. They believed that the
United States had ample grounds to defend its interests because of Mexico's conduct, which included
striking American forces close to the Rio Grande and refusing to negotiate over territorial concerns.
Proponents assert that the conflict was required to safeguard American westward expansion and defend
citizens on disputed territory. (Merk, 1966).

The argument is that even if there were legitimate grievances between the two nations, military action
was not justified and was not the only choice. Diplomacy and peaceful negotiations should have been
pursued instead of war. Additionally, this further emphasizes the belief that the United States' desire for
territorial acquisition played a significant role in manipulating events to provoke Mexico into an all-out
war.

Beyond territorial disputes, Mexico's internal instability during this time must be addressed. Political
upheaval and economic woes weakened the Mexican government, making it difficult for Mexico to
defend its borders and effectively counter US operations. This shortcoming undoubtedly played a role in
the pre-war events and may have been a "just cause" for Americans fearing stability and security.
However, blaming Mexico's fragility alone for starting the war will be the remise influence of strong
economic interests in the US. Enslavers and land speculators, keen to increase their holdings, put pressure
on the government to go to war to seize more land and labor.

The US-Mexico War remains a historical dilemma, its origins entangled in a complex web of factors.
Manifest destiny fueled expansionist ambitions; border disputes provided flashpoints, Mexican instability
created vulnerabilities, and economic interests exerted influence. While some may argue for a deliberate
orchestration, others see "just cause" in Mexico's actions and internal struggles. Ultimately, the truth lies
not in simplistic narratives of good versus evil but ultimately in understanding the historical context and
the interplay of various forces we can safely conclude that pushed two nations toward war.
Works Cited:

Merk, Neville. The Monroe Doctrine and American Expansionism, 1843-1849. Knopf, 1966.

Polk, James K. Diary of James K. Polk, President of the United States, 1845-1849. Barnes & Noble,
1950.