Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 9

CHAPTER 4

PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS, AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA

This chapter examines students' experiences with registration procedures through an

analysis of survey data. We look at how these processes could be made simpler and overall

productivity increased by using intranet solutions. We seek to identify ways to improve

registration systems in learning environments by getting to know students' perspectives.

1.Profile of the Respondents and Opening Questions

Table 1. Age

AGE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE RANK

17 24 25.8% 2

18 40 43% 1

19 11 11.8% 3

20 9 9.7% 4

21 4 4.3% 5

22 4 4.3% 5

24 1 1.1% 6

TOTAL 93 100%

Table 1 indicates the age range of the respondents, with the majority being 18 years old (43% of

the 93 responses). Following that, 25.8% of responders were aged 17 years old, while 11.8%

were aged 19 years old. Also, 20 and 21 years old accounted for 9.7% and 4.3%, respectively,

while 22 and 24 years old were for 4.3% and 1.1%, accordingly, of the total responses.
Table 1.1. Gender

Gender Frequency Percentage Rank

MALE 43 46.2% 2

FEMALE 50 53.8% 1

TOTAL 93 100

Table 1.1 shows the gender distribution of respondents, with females representing the majority at

53.8% and males containing 46.2%.

Table 1.2. Experience with Online Registration/Enrollment

Response Frequency Percentage

Yes 10 10.8%

No 83 89.2%

TOTAL 93 100%

The table shows the responses from respondents with online registration or enrollment, with

10.8% answering "Yes" and the majority, 89.2%, responding "No" out of 93 responses.

Table 1.3. Frequency of Problems During School Enrollment Registration

RESPONSE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE

NEVER 13 14%

2. Do you encounter RARELY 5 5.4%


problems like errors SOMETIMES 13 14%

while registering for OFTEN 52 61.3

your course selection? ALWAYS 10 10.8%

TOTAL 93 105.5%

The data in Table presents the probability of experiencing problems, such as errors, during

choosing a school registration, with 14% of respondents suggesting they never encounter such

issues, 5.4% rarely do, 14% frequently do, 61.3% usually do, and 10.8% always encounter

problems.

Table 2

Perceptions of Intranet System Use for Registration Efficiency

SOP1 Rating Scale Overall


What are the impacts of using an intranet system on 5 4 3 2 1 WM R DE
reducing errors and improving accuracy in course
selection and registration?

1. Do you think using an intranet system make it faster for 15 5 14 3 4 3.82 2 A


students and teachers to sign up for classes? 7

1.1 Do you think intranet can solve the issues or problems 10 4 29 7 2 4.94 3 SA
you encountered while registering online? 5

1. Does intranet makes it efficient? 6 5 29 4 2 3.6 1 A


2
OVERALL WEIGHTED MEAN RATING 4.12

Legend:

WM= Weighted Mean


R= Rank

DE= Descriptive Equivalent

5 4.3-5.00 Strongly Agree

4 3.50-4.20 Agree

3 2.70-3.40 Neutral

2 1.90-2.60 Disagree

1 1.00-1.80 Strongly Disagree

The table shows perceptions about the effectiveness of using an intranet system for registration

purposes. It suggests that respondents mostly agreed that using an intranet system speeds up and

improves the registration method, with a weighted mean rating of 4.12

Table 3

Perceptions of Intranet Solution's Impact on Enrollment Efficiency and Security

SOP2 Rating Scale Overall


What are the key benefits and challenges associated 5 4 3 2 1 WM R DE
with leveraging an intranet solution for student
enrollment within educational institutions?

2. The intranet solution's improved processes make 7 5 23 2 2 3.72 1 A


enrollment more efficient for both students and 9
administrators.
2.1 The intranet solution's direct communication channels 5 6 19 1 2 3.77 3 A
improve openness and responsiveness when resolving 6
student inquiries
2.2 The data security measures implemented by the 7 6 23 2 1 3.75 2 A
intranet solution effectively protect sensitive student 0
information during enrollment.
OVERALL WEIGHTED MEAN RATING 3.75

Legend:

WM= Weighted Mean

R= Rank

DE= Descriptive Equivalent

5 4.3-5.00 Strongly Agree

4 3.50-4.20 Agree

3 2.70-3.40 Neutral

2 1.90-2.60 Disagree

1 1.00-1.80 Strongly Disagree

The table states the key advantages and limitations of using an intranet solution for students

enrolling within educational institutions. It demonstrates that respondents are satisfied with the

intranet solution, with enhanced enrollment processes receiving the highest rating (weighted

mean of 3.72), followed by personal interaction methods (3.77) and data safety technologies

(3.75). Overall, the weighted average rating for the intranet solution's influence on student

enrollment efficiency is 3.75


Table 4

Perceptions of Intranet Solution's Communication and Notification Features

SOP3 Rating Scale Overall


In what ways does an intranet solution enhance 5 4 3 2 1 WM R DE
communication between students and administrators
during the enrollment process?

3. The intranet solution provides timely updates and 9 5 23 2 1 3.77 2


notifications about enrollment deadlines, requirements, 8 A
and procedures.
3.1 The internal messaging system or discussion forums 5 6 19 3 1 3.75 1 A
on the intranet solution enable direct and efficient 5
communication between students and administrators.
OVERALL WEIGHTED MEAN RATING 3.76

Legend:

WM= Weighted Mean

R= Rank

DE= Descriptive Equivalent

5 4.3-5.00 Strongly Agree

4 3.50-4.20 Agree

3 2.70-3.40 Neutral

2 1.90-2.60 Disagree

1 1.00-1.80 Strongly Disagree

The table shows how an intranet solution improves communication between students and

administrators during the registration process. It suggests that respondents value the intranet
solution's timely updates and notifications, with a weighted mean rating of 3.77. Also, the

intranet solution's internal messaging system or communities are considered to allow for direct

quick contact between students and administrators, with a slightly lower but still useful weighted

mean rating of 3.75. In total, the weighted average rating for the intranet solution's impact on

interaction improvements is 3.76.

Table 5

Perspectives of Intranet System's Integrated Platform for Registration Access and

Organization

SOP4 Rating Scale Overall


How does a centralized platform provided by an 5 4 3 2 1 WM R DE
intranet system improve the overall management of
academic registrations for students?

4.) How does a centralized platform provided by an 9 6 16 3 2 3.12 1 A


intranet system improve the overall management of 3
academic registrations for students?
4.1 The centralized platform on the intranet system 10 6 19 2 1 3.83 2 A
improves coordination and communication among 1
different departments involved in the registration process.
OVERALL WEIGHTED MEAN RATING 3.46

Legend:

WM= Weighted Mean

R= Rank

DE= Descriptive Equivalent


5 4.3-5.00 Strongly Agree

4 3.50-4.20 Agree

3 2.70-3.40 Neutral

2 1.90-2.60 Disagree

1 1.00-1.80 Strongly Disagree

According to the data, respondents prefer the centralized platforms from the intranet system,

particularly because it helps improve collaboration and interaction everywhere every department

engaged in the registration process, as shown by the higher weighted mean ratings. Thus,

respondents had a good opinion of the intranet system's impact on educational registration

administration, with a total mean rating of 3.46.

Table 6

Evaluating Intranet Solution's Search Functionality and Navigational Impact on

Registration Efficiency

SOP5 Rating Scale Overall


How does the navigating of an intranet solution impact 5 4 3 2 1 WM R DE
the efficiency of the students/teacher’s registration
processes?

5. The search functionality within the intranet solution 9 6 18 4 1 3.79 2 A


enables students/teachers to quickly locate specific 1
registration-related information or resources
5.1 How would you rate the impact of navigating the 8 5 18 5 5 3.70 1 A
intranet solution on the efficiency of the 7
students'/teachers' registration processes?
OVERALL WEIGHTED MEAN RATING 3.75
Legend:

WM= Weighted Mean

R= Rank

DE= Descriptive Equivalent

5 4.3-5.00 Strongly Agree

4 3.50-4.20 Agree

3 2.70-3.40 Neutral

2 1.90-2.60 Disagree

1 1.00-1.80 Strongly Disagree

The results indicate that respondents highly appreciate the intranet solution's search functionality,
enabling quick access to registration-related information, shown by a higher weighted mean
rating compared to the navigating impact rating. However, the intranet solution appears to
greatly enhance the efficiency of the student and educator registration processes, as proved by a
great total weighted mean rating of 3.75.

You might also like