Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CHAP4 Quantitative
CHAP4 Quantitative
analysis of survey data. We look at how these processes could be made simpler and overall
Table 1. Age
17 24 25.8% 2
18 40 43% 1
19 11 11.8% 3
20 9 9.7% 4
21 4 4.3% 5
22 4 4.3% 5
24 1 1.1% 6
TOTAL 93 100%
Table 1 indicates the age range of the respondents, with the majority being 18 years old (43% of
the 93 responses). Following that, 25.8% of responders were aged 17 years old, while 11.8%
were aged 19 years old. Also, 20 and 21 years old accounted for 9.7% and 4.3%, respectively,
while 22 and 24 years old were for 4.3% and 1.1%, accordingly, of the total responses.
Table 1.1. Gender
MALE 43 46.2% 2
FEMALE 50 53.8% 1
TOTAL 93 100
Table 1.1 shows the gender distribution of respondents, with females representing the majority at
Yes 10 10.8%
No 83 89.2%
TOTAL 93 100%
The table shows the responses from respondents with online registration or enrollment, with
10.8% answering "Yes" and the majority, 89.2%, responding "No" out of 93 responses.
NEVER 13 14%
TOTAL 93 105.5%
The data in Table presents the probability of experiencing problems, such as errors, during
choosing a school registration, with 14% of respondents suggesting they never encounter such
issues, 5.4% rarely do, 14% frequently do, 61.3% usually do, and 10.8% always encounter
problems.
Table 2
1.1 Do you think intranet can solve the issues or problems 10 4 29 7 2 4.94 3 SA
you encountered while registering online? 5
Legend:
4 3.50-4.20 Agree
3 2.70-3.40 Neutral
2 1.90-2.60 Disagree
The table shows perceptions about the effectiveness of using an intranet system for registration
purposes. It suggests that respondents mostly agreed that using an intranet system speeds up and
Table 3
Legend:
R= Rank
4 3.50-4.20 Agree
3 2.70-3.40 Neutral
2 1.90-2.60 Disagree
The table states the key advantages and limitations of using an intranet solution for students
enrolling within educational institutions. It demonstrates that respondents are satisfied with the
intranet solution, with enhanced enrollment processes receiving the highest rating (weighted
mean of 3.72), followed by personal interaction methods (3.77) and data safety technologies
(3.75). Overall, the weighted average rating for the intranet solution's influence on student
Legend:
R= Rank
4 3.50-4.20 Agree
3 2.70-3.40 Neutral
2 1.90-2.60 Disagree
The table shows how an intranet solution improves communication between students and
administrators during the registration process. It suggests that respondents value the intranet
solution's timely updates and notifications, with a weighted mean rating of 3.77. Also, the
intranet solution's internal messaging system or communities are considered to allow for direct
quick contact between students and administrators, with a slightly lower but still useful weighted
mean rating of 3.75. In total, the weighted average rating for the intranet solution's impact on
Table 5
Organization
Legend:
R= Rank
4 3.50-4.20 Agree
3 2.70-3.40 Neutral
2 1.90-2.60 Disagree
According to the data, respondents prefer the centralized platforms from the intranet system,
particularly because it helps improve collaboration and interaction everywhere every department
engaged in the registration process, as shown by the higher weighted mean ratings. Thus,
respondents had a good opinion of the intranet system's impact on educational registration
Table 6
Registration Efficiency
R= Rank
4 3.50-4.20 Agree
3 2.70-3.40 Neutral
2 1.90-2.60 Disagree
The results indicate that respondents highly appreciate the intranet solution's search functionality,
enabling quick access to registration-related information, shown by a higher weighted mean
rating compared to the navigating impact rating. However, the intranet solution appears to
greatly enhance the efficiency of the student and educator registration processes, as proved by a
great total weighted mean rating of 3.75.