Tbbell Document 595

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 38

2013 Legal and Ethical Issues in

Nursing, 6th Edition Test Bank


Visit to download the full and correct content document: https://testbankbell.com/dow
nload/2013-legal-and-ethical-issues-in-nursing-6th-edition-test-bank/
More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant
download maybe you interests ...

Ethical & Legal Issues in Canadian Nursing, 3 Edition


Test Bank

http://testbankbell.com/product/ethical-legal-issues-in-canadian-
nursing-3-edition-test-bank/

Test Bank for Ethical, Legal, and Professional Issues


in Counseling, 6th Edition, Theodore P. Remley

http://testbankbell.com/product/test-bank-for-ethical-legal-and-
professional-issues-in-counseling-6th-edition-theodore-p-remley/

Test Bank for Legal & Ethical Issues in Nursing 7th


Edition Ginny Wacker Guido

http://testbankbell.com/product/test-bank-for-legal-ethical-
issues-in-nursing-7th-edition-ginny-wacker-guido/

Test Bank for Ethical, Legal, and Professional Issues


in Counseling, 5th Edition, Theodore P. Remley

http://testbankbell.com/product/test-bank-for-ethical-legal-and-
professional-issues-in-counseling-5th-edition-theodore-p-remley/
Test Bank for Legal and Ethical Issues for Health
Professions 3rd Edition

http://testbankbell.com/product/test-bank-for-legal-and-ethical-
issues-for-health-professions-3rd-edition/

Test Bank for Gift of Fire, A: Social, Legal, and


Ethical Issues for Computing Technology, 4/E 4th
Edition : 0132492679

http://testbankbell.com/product/test-bank-for-gift-of-fire-a-
social-legal-and-ethical-issues-for-computing-technology-4-e-4th-
edition-0132492679/

Test Bank Ethics and Issues in Contemporary Nursing 4th


Edition Burkhardt

http://testbankbell.com/product/test-bank-ethics-and-issues-in-
contemporary-nursing-4th-edition-burkhardt/

2013 Instructors Manual for Policy and Politics in


Nursing and Healthcare, 6e

http://testbankbell.com/product/2013-instructors-manual-for-
policy-and-politics-in-nursing-and-healthcare-6e/

Test Bank Professional issues in Nursing Challenges and


Opportunities 3rd Edition Huston

http://testbankbell.com/product/test-bank-professional-issues-in-
nursing-challenges-and-opportunities-3rd-edition-huston/
2013 Legal and Ethical Issues in Nursing, 6th Edition Test Bank

2013 Legal and Ethical Issues in Nursing, 6th Edition


Test Bank

To download the complete and accurate content document, go to:


https://testbankbell.com/download/2013-legal-and-ethical-issues-in-nursing-6th-editio
n-test-bank/

Visit TestBankBell.com to get complete for all chapters


Guido, Legal and Ethical Issues in Nursing, 6e
Chapter 06
Question 1
Type: MCSA

A nurse is leaving the parking lot at the hospital and carelessly runs over a patient who was just discharged.
Ironically, the nurse had been assigned to care for that patient that day. If the patient sues this nurse, which
statement is true?

1. The nurse cannot be held liable for either malpractice or negligence based upon this set of facts.

2. The nurse can be held liable for both negligence and malpractice.

3. The nurse can be held liable for malpractice but not negligence.

4. The nurse can be held liable for negligence but not malpractice.

Correct Answer: 4

Rationale 1: The nurse may be held liable for this injury depending upon circumstances.

Rationale 2: While the nurse may be held liable for injuries, this liability does not fall under malpractice.

Rationale 3: Malpractice addresses a professional practice standard and professional status of the caregiver.

Rationale 4: The nurse may be considered negligent related to driving performance as driving action resulted in
harm to an individual. This has nothing to do with the nurse's nursing practice and the care provided to the patient
that day, so malpractice does not apply.

Global Rationale:

Cognitive Level: Applying


Client Need: Safe Effective Care Environment
Client Need Sub: Management of Care
Nursing/Integrated Concepts: Nursing Process: Implementation
Learning Outcome: 6.1 Distinguish negligence from malpractice.

Question 2
Type: MCSA

Punitive damages of one million dollars were awarded to the family of a patient who died following a nursing
medication error. What is true of these punitive damages?

1. These damages are awarded to set an example to other nurses.

Guido, Legal and Ethical Issues in Nursing, 6e, Test Bank


Copyright 2014 by Pearson Education, Inc.
2. The jury believes the nurse’s actions were an honest mistake.

3. This jury identified this case as representing simple negligence.

4. The damages are awarded instead of the nurse serving prison time.

Correct Answer: 1

Rationale 1: Punitive damages may be awarded if there is malicious, willful, or wanton misconduct; are usually
considerable; and are awarded to deter similar conduct in the future.

Rationale 2: Awarding of punitive damages indicates that the jury absolutely does not think the error was an
honest mistake but rather that it was willful in some manner.

Rationale 3: Awarding of punitive damages indicates that the jury absolutely does not think the error was simple
negligence but rather that it was willful in some manner.

Rationale 4: Punitive damages do not substitute for prison time.

Global Rationale:

Cognitive Level: Applying


Client Need: Safe Effective Care Environment
Client Need Sub: Management of Care
Nursing/Integrated Concepts: Nursing Process: Evaluation
Learning Outcome: 6.2 List the six elements of malpractice and give examples of each element in professional
nursing practice.

Question 3
Type: MCSA

A lawsuit has been filed claiming that a nurse’s actions caused the death of a neonate. Why does the attorney for
the plaintiff want to prove proximate cause?

1. Proximate cause determines how far the nurse’s liability extends for consequences of the alleged negligent
actions.

2. The need for expert witnesses is eliminated because harm can be approximated.

3. A direct line of causation, from incident to injury, is proved.

4. To identify if the harm could have been predicted to result from the action of the defendant

Correct Answer: 1

Rationale 1: Proximate cause attempts to determine if the defendant is liable for occurrences that happen after the
negligent act took place.
Guido, Legal and Ethical Issues in Nursing, 6e, Test Bank
Copyright 2014 by Pearson Education, Inc.
Rationale 2: Even if the cause is determined, expert witnesses may be needed to testify on other aspects of the
case, such as practice standards.

Rationale 3: The direct line of causation from incident to injury describes the concept of cause-in-fact. Proximate
cause can be difficult to prove because there are often intervening variables.

Rationale 4: Foreseeability is the concept that the harm that occurred could have been predicted as a result of the
action of the defendant.

Global Rationale:

Cognitive Level: Applying


Client Need: Safe Effective Care Environment
Client Need Sub: Management of Care
Nursing/Integrated Concepts: Nursing Process: Evaluation
Learning Outcome: 6.2 List the six elements of malpractice and give examples of each element in professional
nursing practice.

Question 4
Type: MCSA

The registered nurse who works in the obstetrics department is walking by the emergency department waiting
room when a person cries out, “Help me! My mother is not breathing!” Does this nurse have a duty to assist?

1. Yes, the general duty of care exists to help in times of crisis or imminent harm.

2. No, the nurse is out of the normal working environment and should not interfere.

3. No, the nurse has no more duty to assist in this situation than a lay person.

4. Yes, the nurse has the duty to provide the same standard of care as an emergency department nurse.

Correct Answer: 1

Rationale 1: Even if the nurse is not assigned to a particular patient, a general duty of care arises if the patient
presents with an emergency or is in need of instant help. Therefore, this nurse has a duty to assist in this situation.

Rationale 2: The fact that the nurse is out of the normal working environment does not relieve the general duty of
care.

Rationale 3: The nurse is an employee of the hospital; therefore, a general duty of care exists.

Rationale 4: This nurse has the duty to provide care at the level of a prudent registered nurse, not as an
emergency department nurse.

Global Rationale:

Guido, Legal and Ethical Issues in Nursing, 6e, Test Bank


Copyright 2014 by Pearson Education, Inc.
Cognitive Level: Applying
Client Need: Safe Effective Care Environment
Client Need Sub: Management of Care
Nursing/Integrated Concepts: Nursing Process: Implementation
Learning Outcome: 6.2 List the six elements of malpractice and give examples of each element in professional
nursing practice.

Question 5
Type: MCSA

The court is establishing liability in a case in which several actions caused the plaintiff’s injury. Which test of
causation would be most useful in this case?

1. Proximal cause test

2. But-for test

3. Substantial factor test

4. Fact-of-cause

Correct Answer: 3

Rationale 1: Proximal cause determines how far the liability extends. Fact-of is not a test of causation.

Rationale 2: The but-for test is used to determine if the act or omission actually caused the injury or harm
sustained and is not as related to the percentage of cause.

Rationale 3: Substantial factor is considered the best test to pinpoint liability when several causes occur to bring a
given injury. This test asks whether the defendant’s act or omission was a substantial factor in causing the
ultimate harm or injury.

Rationale 4: Fact-of-cause is not a test of causation.

Global Rationale:

Cognitive Level: Applying


Client Need: Safe Effective Care Environment
Client Need Sub: Management of Care
Nursing/Integrated Concepts: Nursing Process: Evaluation
Learning Outcome: 6.3 Define the three tests currently used by courts in establishing cause-in-fact.

Question 6
Type: MCMA

Guido, Legal and Ethical Issues in Nursing, 6e, Test Bank


Copyright 2014 by Pearson Education, Inc.
A plaintiff’s attorney decides to use the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur in a case against the urologist who perforated
a patient’s urethra during a cystoscopy. What must the plaintiff prove?

Note: Credit will be given only if all correct choices and no incorrect choices are selected.

Standard Text: Select all that apply.

1. This complication does not generally occur unless someone provided negligent care.

2. The locality rule was in effect at the time of the procedure.

3. Several agencies, from the manufacturer to the physician, were involved in the negligence.

4. The plaintiff had no control over the development of the perforation.

5. The event causing the perforation was deliberate.

Correct Answer: 1,4

Rationale 1: In order to prove the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur, the plaintiff must prove that perforation of the
urethra does not occur unless someone was providing negligent care.

Rationale 2: The locality rule is not pertinent to the use of res ipsa loquitur. There is no need to prove that the
event was deliberate.

Rationale 3: In order for this doctrine to be enacted, the injured party must prove that the accident was caused by
an agency or instrumentality within exclusive control of the defendant.

Rationale 4: The instrument that caused the injury must be shown to have been under the management and
control of the alleged wrongdoer, not the injured party.

Rationale 5: There is no need to prove that the event was deliberate.

Global Rationale:

Cognitive Level: Applying


Client Need: Safe Effective Care Environment
Client Need Sub: Management of Care
Nursing/Integrated Concepts: Nursing Process: Implementation
Learning Outcome: 6.4 Analyze the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur and give an example of when the doctrine
would apply to professional nursing practice.

Question 7
Type: MCSA

Guido, Legal and Ethical Issues in Nursing, 6e, Test Bank


Copyright 2014 by Pearson Education, Inc.
A nurse has been named as defendant in a lawsuit claiming patient injury from misuse of equipment. The nurse
says, “The small hospital where I work does not provide the same kind of continuing education training on use of
equipment as larger, more modern hospitals.” The attorney representing this nurse may choose to use which rule
or doctrine?

1. Res ipsa loquitur

2. The locality rule

3. Foreseeability

4. Tortfeasor

Correct Answer: 2

Rationale 1: Res ipsa loquitur was developed to prevent patients who have been harmed from being further
harmed through their inability to show how the injury occurred. It is not related to continuing education
differences between small hospitals and larger hospitals.

Rationale 2: The locality rule attempts to set a standard for the professional similar to that of other professionals
practicing in the same geographic area of the country. This rule arose because of wide variations that once existed
in patient care, depending on whether the hospital was in an urban or a rural setting. Most states have abolished
locality rules.

Rationale 3: Foreseeability is the concept that certain events may reasonably be expected to cause specific
outcomes.

Rationale 4: The tortfeasor is the person committing a civil wrong.

Global Rationale:

Cognitive Level: Analyzing


Client Need: Safe Effective Care Environment
Client Need Sub: Management of Care
Nursing/Integrated Concepts: Nursing Process: Assessment
Learning Outcome: 6.5 Compare and contrast the locality rule to a national standard.

Question 8
Type: MCMA

The nurse is providing care to a patient whose family has previously brought suit against another hospital and two
physicians. How should the nurse provide care to this patient?

Note: Credit will be given only if all correct choices and no incorrect choices are selected.

Standard Text: Select all that apply.


Guido, Legal and Ethical Issues in Nursing, 6e, Test Bank
Copyright 2014 by Pearson Education, Inc.
1. Spend as little time as possible interacting with the patient and family so that there will be less chance of saying
the wrong thing or performing in an incompetent manner.

2. Provide care in a compassionate, competent manner.

3. Assign the patient to a different nurse each day so that no one nurse has to work under this stress.

4. Keep the patient well informed by explaining all interventions before and during their completion.

5. Review standards of care that pertain to this patient before providing care.

Correct Answer: 2,4,5

Rationale 1: Avoiding the patient does not resolve the issue and may actually increase the patient’s feeling that
health care is not reliable.

Rationale 2: Giving the same compassionate, competent care that all patients receive is the best strategy in caring
for suit-prone patients.

Rationale 3: Assigning a different nurse each day may give rise to suspicions by the patient and also provides less
continuity of care.

Rationale 4: Keeping patients well informed helps to reassure them and make them less fearful.

Rationale 5: The nurse should review any standards of care that apply to this patient or to interventions before
providing care. The nurse should ensure that standards of care are met or exceeded.

Global Rationale:

Cognitive Level: Analyzing


Client Need: Safe Effective Care Environment
Client Need Sub: Management of Care
Nursing/Integrated Concepts: Nursing Process: Implementation
Learning Outcome: 6.6 List ways to avoid or lessen the potential of future malpractice cases.

Question 9
Type: MCMA

Which scenarios would the nurse identify as a quasi-intentional tort rather than an intentional tort?

Note: Credit will be given only if all correct choices and no incorrect choices are selected.

Standard Text: Select all that apply.

1. A visitor refuses to leave the patient's room after upsetting the patient and being asked to leave.

2. The physician accuses the nurse of incompetence in front of the patient’s family.
Guido, Legal and Ethical Issues in Nursing, 6e, Test Bank
Copyright 2014 by Pearson Education, Inc.
3. The nurse tells the patient that if he does not starting drinking fluids, an intravenous line will be necessary.

4. The nurse physically restrains a patient so that intravenous access can be obtained.

5. The nursing student takes a cellphone picture of a patient’s leg wound to show her classmates.

Correct Answer: 2,5

Rationale 1: Refusing to leave after being asked is trespass to land, which is an intentional tort.

Rationale 2: Defamatory language about a living person that would adversely affect his or her reputation is
defamation. Defamation is a quasi-intentional tort.

Rationale 3: This could be construed as a threat, which would be considered assault. Assault is an intentional tort.

Rationale 4: Physically restraining a patient can be construed as false imprisonment or battery, both of which are
intentional torts.

Rationale 5: Using patient’s pictures without consent is invasion of privacy, which is a quasi-intentional tort.

Global Rationale:

Cognitive Level: Analyzing


Client Need: Safe Effective Care Environment
Client Need Sub: Management of Care
Nursing/Integrated Concepts: Nursing Process: Implementation
Learning Outcome: 6.7 Define and differentiate between intentional and quasi-intentional torts.

Question 10
Type: MCSA

Upon entering a patient's room to complete discharge instructions, the nurse discovers the patient in tears. The
business office has stated that the patient cannot leave until someone pays a portion of the hospital bill. What
should the nurse do?

1. Call social services to request an immediate financial evaluation.

2. Continue preparations for discharge, comforting the patient as much as possible.

3. Stop discharge preparations until the patient is cleared by the billing office.

4. Cancel the discharge plans and notify the physician of the patient’s status.

Correct Answer: 2

Guido, Legal and Ethical Issues in Nursing, 6e, Test Bank


Copyright 2014 by Pearson Education, Inc.
Rationale 1: It is not within the nurse’s scope of practice to request a financial evaluation. This situation could be
construed to represent false imprisonment.

Rationale 2: The nurse must continue to practice within the nursing scope of practice. This situation could be
construed to represent false imprisonment.

Rationale 3: This scenario could be construed as false imprisonment. The nurse should not stop or slow discharge
preparations.

Rationale 4: Cancelling the discharge order is not within the nurse’s scope of practice. This situation could be
construed as false imprisonment.

Global Rationale:

Cognitive Level: Applying


Client Need: Safe Effective Care Environment
Client Need Sub: Management of Care
Nursing/Integrated Concepts: Nursing Process: Implementation
Learning Outcome: 6.8 List the more commonly occurring intentional torts in health care settings and give an
example of each.

Question 11
Type: MCMA

Which action could result in the nurse being charged with conversion of property?

Note: Credit will be given only if all correct choices and no incorrect choices are selected.

Standard Text: Select all that apply.

1. The nurse removes the patient’s shirt and bra during treatment of a fractured ankle.

2. The nurse removes a package of cigarettes from a patient’s robe pocket.

3. The nurse takes the patient’s picture without permission.

4. The nurse searches a patient’s suitcase for evidence of illegal drugs.

5. The nurse places a patient in four-point restraints to place a nasogastric tube.

Correct Answer: 1,2

Rationale 1: Removing the patient’s clothing, especially if done against the patient’s will, could be construed as
conversion of property. This is especially the case if there is no apparent reason for the clothing to be removed.

Rationale 2: Conversion of property means that the nurse took something of the patient's without permission.

Guido, Legal and Ethical Issues in Nursing, 6e, Test Bank


Copyright 2014 by Pearson Education, Inc.
Rationale 3: Taking a patient’s picture without permission is an invasion of the individual’s privacy.

Rationale 4: Searching the patient's suitcase could be considered invasion of privacy, but unless the nurse took
something out of the suitcase, it is not conversion of property.

Rationale 5: Restraining the patient may result in a charge of false imprisonment.

Global Rationale:

Cognitive Level: Analyzing


Client Need: Safe Effective Care Environment
Client Need Sub: Management of Care
Nursing/Integrated Concepts: Nursing Process: Implementation
Learning Outcome: 6.8 List the more commonly occurring intentional torts in health care settings and give an
example of each.

Question 12
Type: MCSA

An out-of-state caller becomes irate when the nurse cannot provide information over the telephone about a
hospitalized friend. The caller says, “If you know what is good for you, you had better tell me.” Has a civil assault
occurred?

1. Yes, there is an indication that the caller has the physical strength to do harm.

2. Yes, the threat of harm is assault.

3. No, actual physical contact must be made for it to be assault.

4. No, the caller is out of state and cannot reach the nurse.

Correct Answer: 4

Rationale 1: In this case, the caller is out of state, so it is not reasonable that immediate harmful or offensive
contact will occur. While this caller may possess the physical strength to do harm, the caller is too far away to act
on the threat immediately.

Rationale 2: Even though this statement may be uncalled for or frightening, it most likely does not meet the
definition of assault as the caller is too far away to do immediate physical harm.

Rationale 3: Battery is when actual physical contact or harm occurs.

Rationale 4: Assault is defined as the action or motion that creates a “reasonable apprehension in the other person
of immediate harmful or offensive contact to the plaintiff-person.” While this caller may possess the physical
strength to do harm, the caller is too far away to act on the threat immediately.

Global Rationale:
Guido, Legal and Ethical Issues in Nursing, 6e, Test Bank
Copyright 2014 by Pearson Education, Inc.
Cognitive Level: Analyzing
Client Need: Safe Effective Care Environment
Client Need Sub: Management of Care
Nursing/Integrated Concepts: Nursing Process: Assessment
Learning Outcome: 6.8 List the more commonly occurring intentional torts in health care settings and give an
example of each.

Question 13
Type: MCSA

Which common practice puts the nurse at liability for invasion of patient privacy?

1. During care the nurse reveals information about the patient to those in the room.

2. The nurse releases information about the patient to nursing students who will be caring for the patient the next
day.

3. The nurse conducts a patient care session about a patient whose care is difficult and challenging.

4. Confidential information regarding an admitted patient is released to third-party payers.

Correct Answer: 1

Rationale 1: Giving out information about a patient without permission is an invasion of privacy.

Rationale 2: Providing information to those who will be providing care for the patient is not an invasion of
privacy.

Rationale 3: Providing information about a patient to those who will be involved in caring for a patient is not an
invasion of privacy.

Rationale 4: Release of information about a patient to a third-party payer is permissible because the patient signs
consent for this release on admission.

Global Rationale:

Cognitive Level: Analyzing


Client Need: Safe Effective Care Environment
Client Need Sub: Management of Care
Nursing/Integrated Concepts: Nursing Process: Implementation
Learning Outcome: 6.9 List the more commonly occurring quasi-intentional torts in health care settings and give
an example of each.

Question 14
Type: MCMA

Guido, Legal and Ethical Issues in Nursing, 6e, Test Bank


Copyright 2014 by Pearson Education, Inc.
The health care facility has sponsored a continuing education offering on emergency management of pandemic
influenza. At lunch, a nurse is overheard saying, “I'm not going to take care of anyone that might have that flu. I
have kids to think about.” What is true of this statement?

Note: Credit will be given only if all correct choices and no incorrect choices are selected.

Standard Text: Select all that apply.

1. The nurse has a greater obligation than a lay person to care for the sick or injured in an emergency.

2. This statement reflects defamation and may result in legal action against the nurse.

3. The nurse has the right to refuse to care for anyone that could endanger the nurse.

4. This statement is a breach of the Code of Ethics for Nurses.

5. The nurse has this right as no nurse–patient contract has been established.

Correct Answer: 1,4

Rationale 1: Since nurses have greater ability to provide care, their obligation to provide care is higher than that
of lay persons.

Rationale 2: The nurse has not said anything negative about flu victims, so the statement is not an example of
defamation.

Rationale 3: Health care professionals have assumed the risk of care for these individuals based on their choice of
a profession dedicated to the care of the sick.

Rationale 4: Consistent with the Code of Ethics for Nurses, members of the nursing profession should be
available in times of emergency as the profession is a social contract with the public.

Rationale 5: The nurse, by virtue of licensure and employment, is held to a higher standard during emergencies.

Global Rationale:

Cognitive Level: Analyzing


Client Need: Safe Effective Care Environment
Client Need Sub: Management of Care
Nursing/Integrated Concepts: Nursing Process: Planning
Learning Outcome: 6.10 Discuss some of the ethical issues involved in nursing and tort law.

Question 15
Type: MCSA

Guido, Legal and Ethical Issues in Nursing, 6e, Test Bank


Copyright 2014 by Pearson Education, Inc.
2013 Legal and Ethical Issues in Nursing, 6th Edition Test Bank

After 3 years of uneventful employment, the nurse made a medication error that resulted in patient injury. What
hospital response to this event is ethical?

1. The hospital was supportive and assistive as the nurse coped with this event.

2. The nurse was dismissed for incompetence.

3. The hospital quality department advised the nurse not to tell the patient about the error.

4. The nurse was reassigned to an area in which there is no direct patient care responsibility.

Correct Answer: 1

Rationale 1: Nurses must be held accountable for errors but should be treated in a professional and assistive
manner.

Rationale 2: With this nurse’s employment record, dismissal is not an appropriate or ethical step for the hospital.

Rationale 3: Disclosure of errors is the ethical approach.

Rationale 4: With this nurse’s employment record, transfer to a no-patient-care area is not an appropriate or
ethical step for the hospital.

Global Rationale:

Cognitive Level: Applying


Client Need: Safe Effective Care Environment
Client Need Sub: Management of Care
Nursing/Integrated Concepts: Nursing Process: Implementation
Learning Outcome: 6.10 Discuss some of the ethical issues involved in nursing and tort law.

Guido, Legal and Ethical Issues in Nursing, 6e, Test Bank


Copyright 2014 by Pearson Education, Inc.

Visit TestBankBell.com to get complete for all chapters


Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
traveling at such speed that the laau. Ma keia hina ana o na laau
earth shook and the trees were ia Palila, ua pio o
thrown down. It was by means of Namakaokalani, a makau ia
the falling trees that the warriors Kaluaopalena ka makuakane o
of Namakaokalani were Palila, a ua puni o Kauai ia ia.
destroyed until there were none
left. This destruction of the army
of Namakaokalani caused his
defeat and Kaluaopalena, the
father of Palila, became the ruler
of the whole of Kauai.

the second battle of kaua alua a palila.


palila.

Upon the arrival of Palila in Ewa, A hiki o Palila i Ewa, ma


at Waikele, there he met Waikele, e noho ana o
Kamaikaahui, a human shark of Kamaikaahui, he mano kanaka,
two natures, that of a human elua ona ano, he kanaka a he
being and that of a shark. mano.

Kamaikaahui belonged to the No Mualea i Hana, Maui o


land of Mualea in Hana, Maui, Kamaikaahui, he kanaka ai
and he was a man who lived on kanaka. Aia ma ke kua kona
the flesh of other men. His waha, a me na niho mano, a mai
mouth was at his back laila mai kona hele ana mai a
containing several rows of teeth noho ma Waikele. E like me
like the shark. It was from kona hana i Maui, pela kona
Mualea that he came and made hana i Oahu nei. Ka ai i ke
his home at Waikele. As was his kanaka, a ke nahu. [375]Nolaila,
practice while living on Maui, so makau ke ’lii o Oahu nei, o
did he indulge on Oahu. Every Ahuapau, a me na kanaka.
time he got a chance he would Nolaila, olelo ke ’lii, o Ahuapau,
secretly kill men and eat them o ke kanaka e holo ai o
up. When Ahuapau, who was Kamaikaahui, e lilo ia i alii, a e
[374]king of Oahu at this time, komo i ka heiau o Kanelaauli ma
saw this, he and his people Kahehuna, malalo o Puowaina.
became afraid of the man. He
therefore made a decree, that
the man who could drive
Kamaikaahui away from Oahu
would be made king and given
the privilege of first entering the
temple of Kanelaauli, built at
Kahehuna, below Punchbowl.

When Palila heard the king’s Ma keia olelo a ke ’lii, ua lohe o


decree, he made the remark, Palila. Nolaila, olelo o Palila: “Ina
saying: “If I look at him once he e ike aku au iaia, alaila, holo.” Ia
will run away.” Soon after this wa, hoike o Palila me ka laau
Palila met Kamaikaahui who, palau ana o Huliamahi, holo o
upon seeing Palila with the war Kamaikaahui a lele i loko o ke
club, Huliamahi, ran and tried to kai. Hahau aku o Palila i ka laau
jump into the sea. Palila then palau, lele hou i uka, pela ka
struck at the man preventing him hana ana a make o
from falling into the sea, and Kamaikaahui, ia Palila.
every time he tried to jump Palila
would strike him. This was
continued until Kamaikaahui was
killed.

relating to olomana.— no olomana.—kaua


palila’s third battle. akolu a palila.
Olomana was a noted warrior, He koa kaulana o Olomana, i ka
famous for his great strength and loihi a me ka ikaika. Ua makau o
his enormous height. Ahuapau, Ahuapau ke ’lii o Oahu nei ia ia.
the king of Oahu, was in fear of A nolaila, aole e hele aku ma
this man and because of this he Koolau, mai ka lae o Makapuu a
never traveled to Koolau. From ka lae o Kaoio ma Kualoa, ua
the Makapuu point to the Kaoio kapu ia Olomana.
point, at Kualoa, was kapued
and sacred to Olomana.

Olomana 7 was twelve yards, or He umikumamalua kaha-ku o


six fathoms in height, if standing Olomana, ma ke kua, ke ku
and measured from the head to pololei a kaha mai ke poo mai a
the feet. When Palila arrived at na wawae.
the top of the Nuuanu cliff he laid
down his club and sped 8 on till Penei nae ke ano, akolu kapuai
he reached Kaelepulu, the place ma ke kaha hookahi, ua like me
where Olomana was standing. In kanakolukumamaono na kaha
this flight of the club, Palila he umikumamalua. Ke hoonui ia
seized hold of the end and was (eono anana ia).
carried by it until he lit on the
Ia Palila i hiki ai i ka pali o
shoulder of Olomana,
Nuuanu, hoomoe aku la ia i kana
whereupon Olomana asked
laau palau, a holo aku la a hiki i
Palila: “Where are you from, you
Kaelepulu kahi o Olomana e ku
most conceited boy? for my
ana. Ma keia holo ana o ka laau,
shoulder has never been
paa aku la o Palila mahope o ka
stepped on by anybody, and
welau, a hookahi ka lele ana i
here you have gone and done it.”
luna, a ku ana o Palila i ka
Palila replied: “I am from the
poohiwi o Olomana, a ike o
kapued temple; from Alanapo in
Olomana, ninau ae la ia Palila:
Humuula, Kauai. My name is
“Nohea oe e nei keiki hookano,
Palila and I am a soldier.” When
no ka mea, aohe o’u mea nana i
Olomana heard this he was sore
afraid and begged of Palila that hehi, a ia oe iho nei hehi ia.” I
he be saved. Palila, however, aku o Palila: “No ka heiau kapu
refused, saying: “You shall not wau, no Alanapo i Humuula,
live.” Palila then slapped him Kauai, o Palila ko’u inoa, he
cutting away one half, being that koa.” A lohe o Olomana, makau
mountain which is Mahinui and iho la ia Palila, a nonoi aku la ia
leaving one half, the hill of Palila e ola. Hoole mai o Palila:
Olomana, which stands at the “Aole oe e ola ia’u.” Ia wa, papai
same place to this day. o Palila ia Olomana, a lele ae la
kekahi aoao a kaawale, oia o
Mahinui, o kekahi aoao, oia o
Olomana puu e ku nei a hiki i
keia la.

This was the way Olomana was Pela i make ai o Olomana ia


killed by Palila, and in this way Palila, a pela i puni ai o Oahu nei
Ahuapau, the father-in-law of ia Ahuapau, ka makuahunowai o
Palila, came in possession of the Palila.
whole of Oahu.

the fourth battle of kaua aha a palila.


palila.

When Palila arrived at Kaawalii, A hiki o Palila ma Kaawalii, i


in Hilo, Hawaii, he made it his Hilo, Hawaii, noho iho la. Ia wa,
home and lived there for some e kaua ana o Kulukulua ke ’lii o
time. Hilo me Wanua, ke ’lii o
Hamakua, kokoke e pio o
At the time of his arrival a battle Kulukulua ia Wanua. No ka mea,
was being fought between ekolu koa kaulana o Wanua i ke
Kulukulua the king of Hilo and koa a me ka ikaika, o
Wanua the king of Hamakua; Moanonuikalehua, o
and Kulukulua was about to be
beaten by Wanua, for Wanua Kumuonuiaiake, o
had three famous warriors with Puupuukaamai. I ko lakou hui
him who were noted for their ana me Palila, hookahi no laau a
great strength; they were Palila, nei ka honua, nakolo i ka
Moanonuikalehua, lepo, pau i ka make, a me ka
Kumuonuiaiake and luku ia e Palila, i ka aina o
Puupuukaamai. When they Kukaiau ma Hamakua, pela i
came together, Palila swung his lanakila ai. [376]
club but once so strong that the
earth shook to its very
foundation and the club was
buried deep into the ground and
all three were killed. He after this
began the slaughter of the men
and went as far as Kukaiau in
Hamakua, making the victory
complete. [373]

1 Mai ka po mai indicates from very


ancient time; at the beginning of
things. ↑
2 The care and guardianship of
children frequently fell to the
grandmothers. Hawaiians rarely
brought up their own offspring. At birth
they were generally claimed by, or
assigned to some relative, who became
the makua hanai (rearing parent). ↑
3 Na-maka-o-ka-lani, the eyes of
heaven. ↑
4 Ka-lua-o-palena, the second
boundary. ↑
5 Huli-a-mahi, a not inappropriate
name for a weapon; literally “search
and dig,” though in a figurative sense;
used in battle, it means “to overflow;”
revolution. ↑
6 Judging by the name Komoikeanu,
enter the cold, the rise must have
been at quite an elevation. ↑
7 Olomana at seventy-two feet
measured quite a giant. ↑
8 Flying through the air by aid of club
or spear, is frequently used in
Hawaiian story, a magical and
convenient way of covering long
distances. ↑
[Contents]

Story of Piimaiwaa. Kaao no Piimaiwaa.

Piimaiwaa, a Famous Warrior.— Piimaiwaa, he Koa Kaulana.—


Sails for Maui.—Kawalakii Holo i Maui.—Kawalakii ke kii
Image Guard of Kauiki.— Kiai o Kauiki.—Pii Piimaiwaa i ka
Piimaiwaa Climbs the Hill, Puu, Lawe Pio i ke Kii a Lanakila
Overthrows the Image and Is Maluna o Maui.—Imaikalani, ke
Victor Over Maui’s Forces.—Of Koa Makapo.—Pai o Omaokamao
Imaikalani the Blind Warrior.— me Koi i ka ’Lii Makapo.—Loaa ia
Omaokamao and Koi Engage the Omaokamao ke Kumu o ko
Sightless Chief.—Omaokamao Imaikalani Ikaika a Pepehi Iaia.
Learns the Source of
Imaikalani’s Strength and Slays
Him.

Piimaiwaa was one of the most He koa kaulana ia no


famous of the warriors of Keawenuiaumi, i ka ikaika a me
Keawenuiaumi, 1 not only in ke koa, a he koa kaulana a hiki i
strength but as a fearless man keia la, ma Hawaii, a me Maui,
also, and his fame has come kahi ana i hoouka kaua ai. Ia
down to the present generation Kihapiilani i manawa ino ai mai
and he is remembered by the Maui aku a Hawaii, i kona
people of Hawaii and Maui, kaikoeke ia Keawenuiaumi, ke
where he fought his battles. kane a kona kaikuahine a Piikea.

Kihapiilani, after being insulted O ke kumu o keia kaua ana, o ka


by his brother, took it into his miko ana o na maka o
mind to leave Maui and go to Kihapiilani i ke kai paakai a kona
Hawaii to see his brother-in-law, kaikuaana, ke ’lii ia ia o Maui. A
Keawenuiaumi, who was the hiki o Kihapiilani i Hawaii, ninau
husband of Piikea, his sister. mai o Keawenuiaumi: “Heaha
kau huakai?” “He makaia no’u.
The cause of the battle that was Ua kapi ia kuu maka e kuu
fought sometime after this was kaikuaana i ke kai o ka paakai.”
because the salt water from a
dish of fish was thrown into the Ia wa, holo na luna e kala ma
eyes of Kihapiilani by his older Hawaii a puni, e kalai ka waa, e
brother, the king who was then kalai ka ihe, ka pololu, ka elau, e
reigning over Maui. imi ka niho mano. Eono mahina
makaukau na mea a pau loa.
When Kihapiilani arrived on
Hawaii, Keawenuiaumi asked
him: “What is the cause of this
journey?” “I am after some one
to be my avenger. My older
brother has thrown the salt water
from a dish of fish into my eyes.”

Shortly after this the officers


were sent out to make a circuit of
Hawaii with the order to call the
people to come together, hew
out canoes, make spears, the
long and the short ones, and to
go in search of shark’s teeth. 2 At
the end of about six months
everything was in readiness.

After the preparations were Mahope o laila, holo mai la na


completed they set sail for Maui. waa he nui loa, mai Hawaii a
The canoes on this expedition Maui. Ua paa ka moana i na
were so many that it covered the waa, a ua lilo i alanui hele, no na
ocean from Hawaii to Maui and kanaka. A ua kapaia ma ka
the people used them as a road moolelo o Hawaii nei, oia ka waa
to cross over on. It is said in nui o ka helu mua ia.
Hawaiian history that the number
of canoes used in this expedition
was the greatest known.

When the army arrived at Kauiki, A hiki lakou i Kauiki ma Maui, i


Maui, it was found that the king luna o laila ke ’lii kahi i noho ai
had moved and was living or me kona poe koa, i ke ao kaua
encamped with his warriors on maoli, i ka po, he kii ke ku mai i
the hill itself. In the daytime ka ulili, e iho mai ai i lalo o
regular battles were fought, but Kapueokahi.
at night a large image was stood
up at the top end of the ladder
used for climbing up and down
the hill; it was the only way by
which one could get to
Kapueokahi. 3

kawalakii. kawalakii.

Kawalakii 4 was the name given O ia ka inoa o ua kii la; he kii nui,
to the image which was in the i ke ahiahi poeleele, lawe ia mai
shape of a very large man. In the la a ku i ka puka e pii aku ai, a e
evening, just about dusk, the iho mai ai mai ka puu o Kauiki
image would be brought up and mai. Alaila, ku ua kii nei me ka
made [378]to stand at the top end [379]laau palau. I ka po, pii aku
of the ladder. This ladder was na koa o Keawenuiaumi, o
the only means of getting up this Omaukamau ma. A ike i ke ku a
hill. 5 The image was then made keia mea, kuhi no he kanaka,
to stand with a war club in hand. makau no, hoi i lalo, pela no a
hala he mau po ekolu.
On the first night, some of the
warriors of Keawenuiaumi, 6
Omaukamau and others, tried to
get up the hill, but when they
came in sight of something
standing at the top end of the
ladder, believing it to be a real
person, they became afraid and
returned. This attempt to get to
the top of the hill was kept up for
three nights.

how piimaiwaa with his pii o piimaiwaa me kana


war club climbed the laau palau.
hill.

At last Piimaiwaa decided to A kokoke o Piimaiwaa, halalo


make an attempt to see this big aku la ia me ka hookaa i kana
man for himself. When he came laau palau, aole o iala hookaa,
near the man he took his war hoi keia ma ke hema hookaa,
club and began twirling it, but the aole o iala hookaa.
man refused to respond.
Piimaiwaa then took the club in
his left hand and again twirled it,
but the man would not so much
as move his club.

Because of this failure to get his Nolaila, hele keia a kokoke,


opponent to respond to his hoopa keia i ka laau palau koele
challenge, Piimaiwaa climbed ana. Maopopo ia ia nei he kii
the ladder so as to get nearer hoopunipuni, nolaila, kulai keia a
the man. At last he reached a hina, pii i luna o ka puu o Kauiki,
position where he could touch a pau loa iho la na kanaka i ka
him with his club, so he tapped make. A pakele aku ke ’lii no ka
the man a light blow and he mahuka ana, a holo.
heard the sound as of wood. At
this he was made certain that
this was a wooden man put up
there to deceive them. He then
took the image and threw it down
the cliff and he climbed up to the
top of the hill, where he met and
killed all the people with the
exception of the king 7 who
managed to escape.

This victory gave Maui Nolaila, puni o Maui ia


completely into the hands of Kihapiilani, a noho alii iho la, a
Kihapiilani and he became its nana i hana kela alanui kaulana
king. It was by him that the maloko o ka nahele o Oopuola,
famous roadway, which is seen a me ke alanui pupu i Molokai, a
going through the forest of hiki i keia la.
Oopuola, was built, as well as
the shell road which was built
around Molokai, traces of which
can be seen to this day.

relating to imaikalani. no imaikalani.

Imaikalani was a blind chief; he Imaikalani, he ’lii makapo ia,


was without sight, but he had aohe ona mau maka, aka, he
other men to serve him and to kanaka kona maka, a he manu,
act as his eyes. He also had aka he ’lii akamai loa ma ke
some birds who helped see kaua ana, a ma ke kaka laau
things for him. He was a chief ana me ka hoapaio.
who was very skillful in the use
of all weapons of warfare and
particularly so in the use of the
war club.

When the capture of the hill was Kena aku la o Umi ia


completed, Umi ordered Omaokamau, e hele e kaua me
Omaokamau to go and fight Imaikalani, a lohe o
Imaikalani. When Omaokamau Omaokamau, hele aku la ia a
heard this he proceeded to the hiki i kahi o Imaikalani. Ia
home of Imaikalani. When Omaokamau nae e kokoke aku
Omaokamau was drawing near ana e hiki i kahi o Imaikalani,
the home of Imaikalani the birds kani e ae la na manu, ma keia
sounded a note. At this note of kani ana a na manu, olelo aku o
warning from the birds Imaikalani Imaikalani i kona mau kanaka:
said to his men: “Say, there is a “E! he kanaka.” Hoole aku na
man.” The men said: “There is kanaka: “Aohe kanaka.” I aku o
nobody.” Imaikalani remarked: Imaikalani: “Nana ia aku.” Ia laua
“Watch out.” While the two men e nana ana, hiki mai la o
were watching, Omaokamau Omaokamau, alaila, olelo aku la
soon after appeared. The men laua ia Imaikalani: “Ae, he
then said to Imaikalani: “Yes, kanaka, ei ae la, ke hele mai nei
there is a man, he is coming, me ka laau palau i ka lima.” I aku
and he carries a war club in his o Imaikalani: “O Omaokamau
hand.” Imaikalani said: “That is na, he koa no Umi, he kanaka
Omaokamau, one of the warriors akamai i ka pana laau, he ikaika
of Umi; he is well versed in the nae ka pana akau, a ma ka
art of throwing the spear; his hema he nawaliwali, nana ia aku
main strength is in his right arm, nae ke kaa mai i ka laau palau
his left is weak; watch him and ana.” A hiki o Omaokamau, ku
see when he twirls his war club.” iho la ia a o kaa ae la i kana laau
palau, a ike na kanaka, olelo aku
When Omaokamau came up to la laua ia Imaikalani: “E! kaa ua
the men he stood and twirled his kanaka nei i ka laau ana.” Ia
war club. When the two men saw lohe ana o Imaikalani i ka olelo a
this, they said to Imaikalani: na wahi kanaka [381]ku ae la ia i
“Say, the man is twirling his luna, a olokaa i kana laau palau.
club.” [380]When Imaikalani heard Kaa iho la na laau a laua a elua
the report of his two men, he a hiki i ka hahau ana, hahau iho
stood up and began twirling his la o Omaokamau i kana laau
club. The two men kept on palau, ma ka akau ona, e ohiu
twirling their clubs all the time ae ana o Imaikalani i kana laau,
until they struck at each other. hala ka laau a Omaokamau;
Omaokamau struck his club to aole ia i pa. Olokaa hou laua a
his right, but somehow hahau hou o Omaokamau ma ka
Imaikalani warded off the blow hema, i kana laau palau, aole no
by the use of his club and the i pa o Imaikalani. Alaila, hoi aku
first blow aimed by Omaokamau la o Omaokamau, a hiki i mua o
missed. They again twirled their ke ’lii o Umi, ninau mai la o Umi:
clubs and after a time “Pehea kau hele ana aku nei i
Omaokamau struck to his left, kahi o Imaikalani?” I aku o
but again his blow was warded Omaokamau: “Pehea auanei
off and he again missed kau, he makapo na maka o
Imaikalani. After this second Imaikalani, aka, o ka noonoo he
miss Omaokamau turned around pololei, hana mai nei maua, a no
and returned to Umi. When he koiala akamai, makau mai nei au
came up to Umi, Umi asked him: a hoi mai la.”
“How was your trip to the home
of Imaikalani?” Omaokamau
replied: “I don’t know what to
say. The eyes of Imaikalani are
both sightless but his thinking
powers are faultless. I fought him
for a time, but he warded off my
blows so skilfully that I was
afraid of him and so I came
back.”

While Omaokamau was Ia Omaokamau e olelo ana ia


reporting to Umi, Koi spoke up: Umi, pane mai la o Koi: “Aole no
“Of course you could not kill paha e make o Imaikalani ia oe,
Imaikalani; you were not counted no ka mea, aole oe i helu ia mai
of any consequence while we Hawaii mai nei a kakou i holo
were in Hawaii any way. I am the mai nei. Owau no ka i helu ia.”
one that is of consequence.” Koi Alaila, hele aku la o Koi a kahi a
then started off and went as far na manu e kau ana, kani ae la
as the place where the birds na manu, lohe no o Imaikalani,
were stationed. When he heard kena aku la i na kanaka e nana
the birds give the note of aku, a ike laua. Olelo aku la laua
warning, which was also heard ia Imaikalani: “He kanaka nui, ili
by Imaikalani, he was puzzled to kou, he piipii ka lauoho o ke
know what this meant. When poo.” I aku o Imaikalani: “O Koi
Imaikalani heard the notes of the na, he kanaka akamai no i ka
birds he sent his two men to go pana laau, he ikaika hema kona,
and see who it was. When the a he nawaliwali ka akau. Ua like
men came out they saw a man, no laua me Omaokamau.”
so they reported to Imaikalani: “It
is a large man with dark skin and
the hair on his head is curly.”
Imaikalani replied: “That is Koi;
he is also very skillful in the use
of the war club, but he is strong
in the left arm and weak in the
right; he is just like
Omaokamau.”
When Koi came up to his A hiki o Koi, kaa ae la ia i kana
opponents he began twirling his laau palau. Ku ae la no hoi o
war club and as he came within Imaikalani, a kaa i kana laau.
striking distance he raised his Hahau iho la o Koi i kana laau
club and let it come down with all palau me ka ikaika loa, he mea
his might on Imaikalani, but it ole ia ia Imaikalani, a pela no hoi
was warded off by Imaikalani as ma ka akau. Mahope o laila, hoi
though it was nothing. Again Koi aku la o Koi a hiki i mua o Umi,
raised his club and let it come ninau mai o Umi: “Pehea kau
down on his left, but again he hele ana aku nei i o Imaikalani
was foiled. When Koi saw that la?” I aku o Koi: “Aohe koa e
he could not get the best of hele aku i mua o Imaikalani, ua
Imaikalani, he turned around and ike pono aku nei au, ua like no
returned to Umi. When he came me ka Omaokamau olelo a
in the presence of Umi, Umi kakou i lohe ai, pela no ka’u ike
asked him: “How did you get ana aku nei. Hookahi a’u kaa
along with your trip to laau ana, i ka lua, hahau au ia
Imaikalani?” Koi replied: “No Imaikalani, he mea ole ia i ka’u
warrior can stand before ike aku. A pau ia, hoi hou no
Imaikalani, for I have seen him wau, he mea ole no ia
with my own eyes. What Imaikalani. Nolaila, makau au a
Omaokamau has said and all the hoi mai la.” Ia Koi e olelo ana,
things which we have heard are pane mai la o Piimaiwaa ia Koi:
perfectly true, and I must “Aole no paha i oo ka iwi o
therefore give the same report. kamalii, eia mai na iwi i oo.”
After I had twirled my club once Alaila, ku ae la o Piimaiwaa, a
on the second time I struck at hele me kana laau palau, a hiki.
Imaikalani, but from what I could O ka Imaikalani hana no ka olelo
see it was as nothing to him. e like me mamua. Ku o
After the first blow I gave him Piimaiwaa me kana laau palau,
another one but that, too, was as ku o Imaikalani, i ko laua hana
nothing to Imaikalani. I therefore ana, aohe make o Imaikalani, ia
became afraid and returned.” Piimaiwaa, alaila, hoi aku la ia a
While Koi was giving his account hiki i ke ’lii la, hai aku la i kana
of the encounter, Piimaiwaa mau olelo a pau loa. Ua like no
spoke up to Koi: “The bones of a ka Piimaiwaa olelo me ka
youngster like you could not be Omaokamau ma.
old enough; here are the bones
that are well matured.”
Piimaiwaa then stood up, took
up his club and started off. When
he came up with Imaikalani, he
heard the birds. His appearance
was then reported by the men to
Imaikalani, that another warrior
was coming. As Piimaiwaa stood
in the presence of Imaikalani,
Imaikalani stood up ready to
defend himself. After trying his
skill against Imaikalani
Piimaiwaa saw that he was
unable to best his opponent, so
he too returned to the king and
told him of what he had done,
which was the same thing
reported by Omaokamau and
Koi.

On account of the failure on the Ma keia mau mea a pau loa a


part of Umi to kill Imaikalani, lakou i hana ai, ua makau loa ia
Imaikalani was greatly feared o Imaikalani, a ua manao lakou
and they all but decided to e haalele i ke kaua ana ia ia. [383]
abandon the fight and leave
Imaikalani alone. [382]
After the lapse of some tens of He mau anahulu i hala ma keia
days, after the incidents noho ana, launa aku la o
recorded above, Omaokamau Omaokamau me kekahi kanaka
met a man who was born and kamaaina. I mai la ke kamaaina:
raised on the place, who asked “Heaha ka mea e make ole nei o
him: “Why is it that Imaikalani Imaikalani ia oukou?” I aku o
has not been slain by your Omaokamau: “Heaha hoi.” I mai
people?” Omaokamau kela: “Ua make, he wahi iki wale
answered: “I don’t know why.” no, aole i mahuahua.” Alaila,
The man said: “He can be slain, nonoi aku la o Omaokamau ia ia:
it can be done easily. It will not “E hai mai i kahi e make ai, o
take much of an exertion.” Imaikalani,” a ae mai la kela.
Omaokamau then asked him: Olelo mai ke kamaaina ia
“Will you tell me how it can be Omaokamau: “E! auhea oe, ina
done?” The man then said to oe e hoolohe i ka’u olelo, alaila,
Omaokamau: “Say, if you obey hoolohe au i kau.” I aku o
what I will tell you, then I will do Omaokamau: “Pehea kau
what you want.” Omaokamau olelo?” “Penei ka’u olelo ia oe.
then again asked him: “What do Mai olelo iki oe ia’u, na’u oe i hai
you want me to do?” The man aku i kahi e make ai o
said: “Don’t speak a word about Imaikalani, no ka mea, owau nei
me and never repeat to any one la, he iwikuamoo ponoi au nona,
that I told you how to get the he paa kahili.” Alaila, ae aku la o
best of Imaikalani, because I am Omaokamau, a hoohiki aku la,
his own immediate servant, a aole ia e olelo ia hai, aole hoi i
backbone; I am one of his kahili ke ’lii, aole hoi i kona mau
bearers.” Omaokamau then gave hoahanau ponoi, aole i kekahi
his promise, that he would not mea e ae. Wahi a Omaokamau:
tell any one, not to the king, not “Ina e lohe ia, a e ike ia keia
to his own brothers nor to any mea, alaila o kona ola ke pani.”
other person. “If you should hear Ma keia mau olelo a
or know that I have broken my Omaokamau, hai aku la ke
promise, then my life shall be kamaaina. “O na manu e kau la
forfeited,” continued mawaho, oia kona mau maka,
Omaokamau. Because of this oia hoi ka mea e maopopo ai ia
promise made by Omaokamau, he kanaka ke hiki aku ana, a oia
the man said: “The birds which kona mea e makaukau mua ai
sit on the outside are his eyes, no ke kaua, a pela e noonoo ai o
and it is by them that he is Imaikalani; aka, ina e make na
warned of the approach of any manu, alaila, make o Imaikalani,
person. On hearing this warning aole e ola.”
he prepared himself for the
conflict. The men with him are
also his eyes; they are the ones
who tell him when the enemy is
near and this gives him a chance
to use his wits and to defend
himself. But if the birds and the
men are first killed then
Imaikalani can be slain, he will
not escape.”

When Omaokamau heard this A lohe o Omaokamau i keia mau


from the man, he stood up and olelo a ke kamaaina, ku ae ia a
started off to carry out the advice hele, a hiki i kahi e kau ana na
given him. When he came up to manu, hili ae la ia i na manu i
the place where the birds kana laau palau, a haule iho la i
generally sat he crept up lalo, a make iho la na manu. Eia
cautiously and struck them with nae, ia Omaokamau i hili ai i na
his club, killing them. But before manu, mamua o kona hili ana,
Omaokamau had the chance to kani ae la na manu, a lohe aku
kill the birds, they gave their la no o Imaikalani. Nolaila,
warning note and Imaikalani hoolale aku la ia i na kanaka
heard it; so he asked his men to kiai, i nana aku ka hana, o
look and see if a man was Omaokamau ke hele mai ana.
coming. The men then looked Ma keia hele ana a
and saw that it was Omaokamau, e manao ana na
Omaokamau. When wahi kanaka kiai, e hele la o
Omaokamau came up to the Omaokamau a ke kahua kaua,
guards, they thought he had alaila, la ku. Makaukau o
come to do battle with Imaikalani, aka, aole nae o
Imaikalani, and that he would Omaokamau i hana pela. I ka wa
come to the battle ground and a na kanaka kiai e nana pono
there make his stand, when mai ana ia Omaokamau, ia wa
Imaikalani would get ready to no o Omaokamau i hele aku ai
fight him; but in this they were me ka wiwo ole, a me ke ano
mistaken, for Omaokamau did koa loa, me ka laau palau i kona
not go to the battle ground but lima. A launa aku la ia me na
came right along fearlessly with wahi kanaka, hahau aku la ia i
his war club in his hand. As soon kana laau palau i luna o laua, a
as he came up to the two men make iho la. Pela no hoi o
he struck them with his war club, Imaikalani, hou aku la ia i ka
killing them. He then turned to welau o kana laau palau i ka opu
Imaikalani and poked him in the o Imaikalani, a make iho la ia.
stomach with the point of his
club, killing him.

Omaokamau then returned to Hoi aku la o Omaokamau a hiki i


Umi, the king, and told him of the mau o ke ’lii o Umi, olelo aku la i
death of Imaikalani, slain by his ka make ana o Imaikalani ia ia, a
hands. When Umi and the rest of lohe o Umi a me na mea a pau
the people heard this, they loa, ninau mai la lakou i ke kumu
asked him how he was able to o ka make ana. Hai aku o
kill the great and famous Omaokamau ia lakou: “Penei ke
Imaikalani. Omaokamau then kumu o ka make ana o
said to them: “This is how I was Imaikalani ia’u. I nehinei, hele
able to slay Imaikalani: aku la au i ka auau ma ka wai o
Yesterday on going down to the Mauoni, i laila, loaa ia’u he
stream of Mauoni for a bath, I kamaaina no Maui nei. Ninau
met a Maui man who asked me: mai la ia ia’u, ‘Ua make iho nei o
‘Have you people killed Imaikalani ia oukou?’ Hoole aku
Imaikalani?’ I said, ‘No.’ Then he wau ‘aole.’ Alaila, olelo mai kela:
said to me: ‘Yes, it is only a small ‘Ae, he uuku wale no kahi e
thing to kill him.’ When I heard make ai.’ A lohe au i keia olelo
this, I asked him to tell me how it ana, nonoi aku la au ia ia e hai,
could be done, while I promised me kuu hoohiki pu, ae mai la
him at the same time that I would kela. Eia ka mea e make ai o
keep his name and identity a Imaikalani: ‘E pepehi i na manu
secret. He then told me how I a make loa, no ka mea, oia ko
was to do it; said he, ‘Here is the Imaikalani leo;’ a oia ke kumu i
way to kill Imaikalani: You must make ai ia’u.” [384]
first kill the birds and the two
watchmen, who are Imaikalani’s
guards and who give him
warning of the approach of any
person. Kill the birds and the
men, then you will be able to kill
Imaikalani.’ That is how I was
able to kill him.” [377]

1 This is wide of tradition. Umi is the


chief intended, not his son, both as
to his connection with Piikea and battle
in behalf of Kihapiilani. ↑
2 Sharks’ teeth were for war weapons,
of which there were several kinds or
shapes and lengths. ↑
3 This and the two following stories
are versions of brief extracts from
Umi, given in Vol. i, p. 178, et seq. ↑
4 This was the famed giant image
watchman of Kauiki fortress; name

You might also like