Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Education As Politics Colonial Schooling and Political Debate in Senegal 1850s 1914 1st Edition Kelly M. Duke Bryant
Education As Politics Colonial Schooling and Political Debate in Senegal 1850s 1914 1st Edition Kelly M. Duke Bryant
https://ebookmeta.com/product/schooling-the-nation-education-and-
everyday-politics-in-egypt-the-global-middle-east-hania-sobhy/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/conflict-war-and-revolution-the-
problem-of-politics-in-international-political-thought-1st-
edition-paul-kelly/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/education-in-the-open-society-karl-
popper-and-schooling-1st-edition-bailey/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/land-politics-how-customary-
institutions-shape-state-building-in-zambia-and-senegal-lauren-
honig/
Pasts at play Childhood encounters with history in
British culture 1750 1914 1st Edition Rachel Bryant
Davies (Editor)
https://ebookmeta.com/product/pasts-at-play-childhood-encounters-
with-history-in-british-culture-1750-1914-1st-edition-rachel-
bryant-davies-editor/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/dying-to-count-post-abortion-care-
and-global-reproductive-health-politics-in-senegal-siri-suh/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/colonial-encounters-in-a-time-of-
global-conflict-1914-1918-1st-edition-santanu-das-editor/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/the-education-debate-3rd-edition-
ball/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/the-anthropocene-debate-and-
political-science-1st-edition-thomas-hickmann-editor/
Educat ion as Po l itics
Afr ica and the D i a sp o ra
Hist ory, Polit ics, Cult ure
Thomas Spear
Neil Kodesh
Tejumola Olaniyan
Michael G. Schatzberg
James H. Sweet
Education as Politics
Copyright © 2015
The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System
All rights reserved. Except in the case of brief quotations embedded in critical articles and reviews, no part of
this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, transmitted in any format or by any means—
digital, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise—or conveyed via the Internet or a
website without written permission of the University of Wisconsin Press. Rights inquiries should be directed to
rights@uwpress.wisc.edu.
Introduction 3
Part I
Part II
Conclusion 163
Notes 171
Bibliog raphy 215
Index 229
vii
I llus t rat io ns
ix
Acknowledgme nt s
This book is the culmination of more than a decade of research, writing, and
intellectual conversation, and it emerged from work—and time—in three
countries. Numerous people and institutions have supported this book in various
ways, and I am humbled by their generous contributions. I can only begin to
thank them here.
My research would not have been possible without financial support from
several different sources. A Scott Kloeck-Jenson predissertation travel grant
from the University of Wisconsin and grants from the Institute for Global
Studies and the Center for Africana Studies at Johns Hopkins University allowed
me to take exploratory trips to archives in Senegal and France when this project
was only an idea. I spent all of 2007 conducting the bulk of the research, and
this work was assisted by a fellowship from the International Dissertation Field
Research Fellowship Program of the Social Science Research Council with
funds provided by the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, by a Fulbright-Hays
Doctoral Dissertation Research Abroad grant, and by a TIAA-CREF Ruth
Simms Hamilton Research Fellowship. Rowan University generously provided
funding for subsequent research trips to Senegal and to France. I am enormously
grateful to all of these granting institutions.
In Senegal I spent many hours in the reading room of the Archives nationales
in Dakar, and archivists and staff members there were gracious with their time
and expertise. I would especially like to thank former directors Saliou Mbaye,
Papa Momar Diop, and Babacar Ndiaye, as well as staff members Mamadou
Ndiaye, Ibrahima Mbengue, and Mossane Diouf, for helping make my research
time both productive and enjoyable. Babacar Ndiaye suggested useful files to
consult and provided a number of contacts for interviews. Mamadou Ndiaye
brought me numerous files and helped me think of less obvious places to look for
documents. And Mossane Diouf offered her assistance and friendship. I would
also like to express my thanks to the current director of the Archives nationales,
Fatoumata Cisse Diarra, for granting permission for the use of several lengthy
direct quotations. They have helped bring this study to life. I wish to thank
xi
xii Acknowledgments
Ngor Sène of the Service régional des archives de Saint-Louis for sharing his
ideas. My interviews were assisted by Sidy Diop in Saint-Louis, by Amadou
Issa Sall and El Hajj Amadou Gallou Diop in Louga, and by Pape Niang in
Mouit. Thanks to all of them.
I owe a special debt of gratitude to Ndiouga Adrien Benga, professor of
history at the Université Cheikh Anta Diop in Dakar. He has supported this
project from the beginning, and, during my stay in Dakar in 2007, he took time
out of his busy schedule to discuss my research with me on several occasions.
His comments and thoughts helped the project take shape, and his continued
interest in my project has helped guide its completion. Professor Ibrahima
Thioub met with me at a critical moment, and his wise counsel helped me fruit-
fully refocus my research. Professor Boubacar Barry opened up his home and
his library to me. I greatly appreciate the staff at the Institut fondamental
d’Afrique noire (IFAN) for their assistance, especially El Hadji Birame Diouf,
who facilitated my use of the William Ponty notebooks. I would also like to
express my thanks to Professor Ousmane Sène and to the West African Research
Center, which he directs.
Senegal is an incredibly welcoming place, and I have treasured the friends
who have enriched my experiences there. I will always be grateful to the Kandji
family, whose friendship means so much to me. Mamadou and Fatou Kandji
opened their home to me the first time I went to Senegal, and they, along with
their children—Badou, Cheikh, Bass, Xuba, and Aïssatou—and their children’s
families, have continued to offer kindness and encouragement. The Kandji
family, and our friendship, spans the Atlantic. Thanks to Pape Cissé and Aby
Cissé for providing me with a home in Louga, to Gora Ndiaye for his able driving
and navigation, and to Jean-Jacques Bancal for his support of my research in
Saint-Louis. Aminata Fall provided endless encouragement, and Fatou Kandji’s
Wolof classes and translation assistance were invaluable. Jërëjëf ! Thanks to
Rachel Petrocelli, Tim Krupnik, Hannah Gilbert, and Sarah Hardin, all of
whom shared their living spaces with me. Their company, conversation, and
friendship made life in Senegal a lot more fun.
My project has also benefited from research in France. I would like to thank
the staff of the Archives nationales d’Outre-Mer in Aix-en-Provence for making
my research there possible. Catherine Atlan, Maître de Conférences at the
Université de Provence, Aix-Marseille, helped orient my research in Aix and
shared numerous contacts in Dakar. Amandine Bouvard and Laurent Iglesias
were the best next-door neighbors one could hope for, and they have become
good friends. I spent too few days working in the Archives générales de la
Congrégation du Saint-Esprit in Chevilly-Larue, France, and I am grateful for
Père Gérard Vieira’s assistance in making them productive. My research also
Acknowledgments xiii
O n 10 May 1914, Blaise Diagne made history, becoming the first black man
to serve as Senegal’s deputy to the French National Assembly. Born in Gorée
in 1872 to a domestic servant and a cook, Diagne was exposed to the colonial
education system, which took him down a path that differed markedly from
that of his parents. After attending secondary school, he accepted a job with the
colonial customs service. His first posting, in 1892, sent him to Dahomey, and
over the next twenty or so years he worked across the empire but never in
Senegal. Instead, he held positions in French Equatorial Africa, in the Indian
Ocean colonies of Réunion and Madagascar, and in the Caribbean colony of
Guiana. Thus, when he returned to Senegal in early 1914 to run for the deputy
ship, he was virtually unknown to most voters, though some political activists
had encouraged his candidacy. He began to gather a following by speaking at
political meetings and rallies and by publishing articles in the privately owned
newspaper La Démocratie, whose editor ultimately endorsed him. He also devel-
oped a platform that spoke to the concerns of black voters by emphasizing the
protection of blacks’ citizenship rights, tax reforms, better social services, and
more and higher quality education. Furthermore, he won the support of the
Young Senegalese, a relatively new political party in Saint-Louis with a mem-
bership dominated by employees of the colonial administration and of private
commercial firms. In the first round of voting, Diagne took more votes than
any of the other eight candidates, but he failed to win outright. In the second
round, competing against two others, Diagne received enough votes to win the
3
4 Introduction
election, though he beat the second-place candidate by fewer than two hundred
votes.1
It is well known that the election of 1914 was a turning point in Senegal’s
political history, bringing black candidates and voters into the political arena in
a new and significant way. Others have analyzed the campaign and election as
events that galvanized black voters and political activists, encouraged black
voters to break free from the influences of powerful métis (mixed-race) or French
political patrons, and forever changed the landscape of electoral politics in
Senegal by demonstrating that black candidates could run, win, and serve.
Indeed, as G. Wesley Johnson has famously claimed, the 1910s were an era of
“African political awakening.”2 But the 1914 election, as important as it was for
electoral politics in Senegal, also represents a culmination of decades of colonial
education policies and initiatives, which not only prepared Diagne to run for
office and allowed his supporters to carry out a successful campaign but also
reshaped African understandings of politics. In this book, I examine the broader
history of French educational institutions and policies in Senegal and of African
reactions to them, exploring the relationship between African strategies vis-à-vis
colonial schools and larger-scale political change. This investigation has much
wider resonance, however, since Senegal served as a test case for colonial edu-
cation policies that ultimately applied to all of French West Africa. I argue that
everyday negotiations surrounding colonial schooling transformed African
power relations and gerontocracy, shaped colonial politics, and produced racial
discourses in early colonial Senegal. Furthermore, African engagement with
colonial schooling and the societal changes it brought about made possible the
1914 election of Blaise Diagne.
Unique among French colonies in Africa for its electoral institutions, Senegal
received representation in the French National Assembly in 1871. Yet, signifi-
cantly, voting was limited to residents of the most important coastal towns,
called Communes, which had a long-standing French presence and to which
Paris had granted a status and organization similar to those of French munici-
palities. Although voting rights applied to French nationals, mixed-race (métis)
residents, and Africans (called originaires) who had been born in the Communes,
few Africans stood for election, and even fewer won elected office before the
turn of the twentieth century. Indeed, French nationals monopolized the
deputyship until 1902, when François Carpot, an attorney who belonged to a
prominent métis family in Saint-Louis, used his connections to local people and
his familiarity with the Wolof language to garner enough support for a victory.
Carpot represented Senegal until Diagne defeated him in 1914.3 Diagne’s elec-
tion in turn marked a watershed moment, since it invited blacks into formal
political participation in unprecedented numbers. And, significantly, all of
Introduction 5
compromise. Even so, the issue of school segregation and access to quality
secondary education for blacks reemerged in 1913 and would continue periodi-
cally to do so well into the interwar period. It is thus likely that Diagne’s em-
phasis on schooling truly resonated with voters. A postelection complaint by
François Carpot, the incumbent and one of Diagne’s main opponents, suggested
that this was in fact the case. Carpot accused Diagne and his supporters of pro-
moting “race war” by telling black voters that the French and métis candidates
thought of them as “nearly like slaves” and stood against “their emancipation
and their instruction.”6 Regardless of the accuracy of his claim, Carpot clearly
acknowledged the potency of colonial education as an issue.
The implications of the 1914 election were most significant in the Communes,
but the issues debated during the campaign and Diagne’s victory resonated in
the rest of the colony, despite the fact that most people who lived there could
not vote. As I discuss at greater length in chapter 6, many residents of the pro-
tectorate, considered to be colonial subjects rather than citizens, followed the
election closely and became more involved in colonywide politics. It seems
possible that some joined with the Young Senegalese organization to support
Diagne since, according to Antonetti, the party included about four hundred
originaires and about the same number of nonvoters who had been born outside
the Communes. Chiefs and elders in the protectorate watched with alarm as
their youth became more politically active. And some marabouts, especially
those who belonged to the Murid brotherhood, gave financial and moral support
to Diagne’s campaign. It is likely that many of these marabouts were subjects
and therefore not eligible to vote, yet they still professed an interest in the cam-
paign. These resonances suggest that we need to consider not only the ways
that colonial schooling affected politics in the Communes but also how it re-
shaped power relations in the protectorate areas. As I show in the pages that
follow, in both Communes and protectorate, colonial schooling remade power
relations among Africans and helped define their relationship to the colonial
state. Various trajectories of change came together in the 1914 election, and an
exploration of the politics of colonial schooling in the preceding decades goes a
long way in explaining how this came to pass.
Indeed, the 1914 campaign and election raise important questions about
the effects of colonial education policy on African families and communities.
Diagne and at least some of his supporters came from families that had adopted
colonial schooling fairly early on. Yet, in contrast, most parents, especially
those who lived in the protectorate, simply were not interested in colonial
schooling, a complaint made by many teachers as they tried to work around
parental resistance and to address chronic shortages in supplies, facilities, and
Introduction 7
funds.7 Why, then, did some Africans choose to attend a colonial school, even
as most continued to turn away, and how did these decisions affect local power
relations? Scholars have often observed that most parents were not initially
interested in enrolling their children in colonial schools, but they have left
largely unexplored parents’ decision-making process, an issue I focus on in
chapters 1 and 3. Although some scholars have suggested that chiefs often sent
their slaves to school in place of their own relatives, my research in Senegal
demonstrates that at least some of the time, chiefs were eager to send their rela-
tives to school and that a few attempted to benefit by acquiring influence over
the new institutions. These chiefs, I contend, saw French schooling as a resource
that they could attempt to control and then use in support of their own authority.
Clearly, there was no single response to the expansion of colonial schooling in
French West Africa, and, as Jean-Hervé Jézéquel has recently argued, scholars
need to consider individual trajectories and experiences.8 This is the approach
that I take here in exploring the motivations of parents and chiefs in Senegal’s
interior as they engaged with and made sense of the expansion of colonial
schooling. In this book, I push beyond Jézéquel’s description of the multiple
strategies and priorities of African students and their families to consider the
longer-term political import of their choices.
The significant role played by French-educated activists in the 1914 cam-
paign also prompts questions about how colonial schooling affected African
politics and the extent to which it created new political opportunities for Afri-
cans. Although scholars have demonstrated conclusively that French, British,
and other European officials used education as an instrument of colonialism,
they have mostly overlooked corollary questions about the politics behind Afri-
can decisions about and reactions to colonial schools.9 How, for example, did
local power dynamics shape African responses to the expansion of colonial
schooling? How did resources—including money and labor—and their role in
local power relations affect parents’ and young people’s decisions about school
attendance? How did education figure into African responses to the racism
implicit in the notion that Africans required French tutelage? In this book I
contend that many Africans envisaged French schooling as a significant new
resource that they could deploy in local political debates and competitions and
that they could incorporate into their interactions with the developing colonial
state. Sometimes this resource was financial, while other times it took the form
of patronage, prestige, or specialized skills. Schooling also gave Africans an
arena in which to contest colonial policies that they found disagreeable or
oppressive, and it encouraged them to embrace a new vocabulary of race and
racial equality as racism came increasingly to inflect their interactions with
8 Introduction
people, Islamic teachers, chiefs, and politicians engaged with colonial schooling
and, in doing so, reconfigured African politics in both the Communes and the
protectorate in the decades leading up to the momentous election.
their children and families, but they also weighed in on such issues as the
emerging role of the colonial chief, the authority of Islamic leaders and teachers,
the hierarchy of generation, the meaning of race and racism, and the relation-
ship between citizens and subjects in the colony. In this way, colonial schooling
played a central role in political debate in Senegal at the turn of the twentieth
century.
The political potential of colonial schooling derived in large part from its
ability to enter into the intimate domains of family life, socialization, and child
rearing. As such, an analysis of schools as points of intersection between African
families and the colonial state reveals much about how African families shaped
and were shaped by colonialism.16 In their efforts to increase school attendance
and develop the education system, officials and teachers brought ever larger
numbers of people into some sort of contact with the colonial state, allowing
the government not only to interact with subjects on a more personal level but
also to obtain more information about them by maintaining registers and
detailed records of enrollment, attendance, school performance, and the like.
These are important issues since, as Michel Foucault so perceptively argued,
schools, along with hospitals and prisons, allowed for the development of a new
and much more intimate kind of state power. Surveillance and regular exami-
nations became central to the institution of the school, and these functions
contributed to a new technology of power that states used to their benefit. This
study considers such connections between schooling and the power of the state
as well as the limitations to state power that schooling revealed. Yet it mostly
attempts to move us past this insight to understand why, especially when school-
ing was not compulsory, Africans chose to attend or to send their children to
school. Significantly, I find that their motivations extended far beyond schooling
and stemmed also from concerns about politics, power, and the impact of colo-
nial rule in their own communities.17
If colonial schooling is a relatively straightforward concept, “politics” is
much less so, and I would like to clarify how I use that term here. In the Senegal
colony at the turn of the twentieth century, a period when most people were
unable to vote and elected officials operated as power brokers alongside chiefs,
interpreters, and other colonial employees, it would make little sense to limit
“politics” to such events as elections, legislation, campaigns, and the like. Instead,
one might take cues from Michael Hanchard, who proposes the notion of
“quotidian politics” in an attempt to capture a wider range of activities within
political theory and to move political scientists and other scholars beyond the
notion that politics must always have something to do with the activities of the
state. Hanchard’s concept is appealing because it expands our understanding
of political activity to encompass the experiences of subordinate groups, yet it is
12 Introduction
Colonial Schooling:
French Politics, French Policies
This book focuses on African interaction with colonial schooling in Senegal
from the 1850s to 1914, beginning with a decade that set the tone for the expan-
sion of French schooling beyond the Communes and ending with Blaise Diagne’s
election. This period bridges an era of commercial empire that came before and
one of cultural nationalism and, ultimately, anticolonial struggle that came after.
But it is also significant in its own right. Encompassing conquest, the imposition
of French rule, the multiplication of colonial bureaucracies and personnel, and
new efforts to curtail citizenship, this period presented Africans with numerous
opportunities to respond creatively and strategically as they encountered colo-
nial institutions and expectations, often for the first time. Also in this period, the
French articulated the goals of colonial education, established many schools,
and developed a framework of policies governing schooling that would remain
in place for decades. Significantly, education policies reflected the priorities of
the French presence and the nature of their relations with Africans.
From the early eighteenth century to about 1848, Atlantic commerce
structured the interactions between Africans and Europeans and drew coastal
people in particular more fully into the Atlantic world. The demands of long-
distance trade and the desire to turn a quick profit motivated French men to
sojourn in Gorée or Saint-Louis for relatively brief periods. Opportunities to
trade with Europeans fueled African settlement of these territories and also
guided the economic decisions of the rulers of traditional states in the interior.
Africans, métis, and Europeans negotiated, certainly, but these negotiations
centered on economic issues—terms of trade, advances of merchandise for sale
upriver, the cost of slaves or gum arabic—and on intimate or domestic ones.
Introduction 13
inland, setting the stage for colonial conquest. Yet, even so, prior to the 1850s,
France possessed neither extensive territory nor significant political authority
in Senegal.20
Because Senegal served commercial functions and because the resident
French community was quite small, French-style schools were not available
for most of this early period. Only after the Napoleonic Wars, in an effort to re-
establish and strengthen French control over territory lost to the British during
that conflict, did French officials begin to focus on schooling. Jean Dard, a
Frenchman, opened a mutual school for boys in Saint-Louis and received his
first students in 1817, and a Mr. Pécarrère established a boys’ school in Gorée
at around the same time. The Sisters of Saint-Joseph of Cluny took charge of
girls’ schools in the colony, welcoming their first students in 1819. At this early
date, French officials had not developed a set of policies or goals to guide the
development of schooling, and schools were limited to these two coastal towns.
In line with the role of Saint-Louis and Gorée as trading enclaves, boys’ schools
generally served to train trade intermediaries and to encourage local support
for the French presence, while girls’ schools aimed to teach white, mixed-race,
and eventually black girls to be good mothers, homemakers, and domestic
workers.21
In 1841, the Brothers of Christian Instruction (also called the Ploërmel
Brothers), a Catholic teaching order, took charge of the public schools for
boys at the request of the governor of Senegal and of the French minister of
the marine and colonies, who had become frustrated by frequent turnovers in
personnel, intermittent closures, and other problems. Reflecting the recent
shifts toward a more permanent French presence, these schools more overtly
pursued a civilizing mission. The Brothers designed them to promote French
civilization; to spread the French language; to teach academic subjects includ-
ing mathematics, history, and geography; and to provide vocational training.
School leavers tended to pursue work in commerce—as bookkeepers, clerks, or
traders—perhaps the most lucrative professions held by Africans and métis at
the time. Schooling also prepared them to take up positions with the develop-
ing colonial government. Girls’ schools were even more practically oriented,
focusing on French, history, sewing, and other domestic tasks. Though they
taught academic subjects and practical skills, perhaps the most important mo-
tivation of Catholic personnel and their superiors in France was to use the
schools to gain converts to Christianity. Not only was conversion their mission,
but also they viewed it as critical to the process of civilization. Accordingly,
these schools catered especially to métis and to Christian blacks, though Muslims
always attended and they predominated in the evening classes that the Ploërmel
Brothers began to offer in 1857.22
Introduction 15
schools enrolled some 1,841 male and 668 female students, up from more than
700 male and far fewer female students in the early 1860s.29
Although the French approach to schooling in the Communes varied
somewhat over time and according to individual opinion, officials consistently
considered it to be an important part of the civilizing mission, the idea that
France had an obligation to spread its civilization and values among purportedly
“backward” peoples. This impetus had animated colonial projects since the
eighteenth century at least, as Alice Conklin suggests, and it drew on ideals of
the Enlightenment, the French Revolution, and republicanism.30 Prior to the
late nineteenth century, especially in the Communes, many colonialists linked
the civilizing mission to the goal of “assimilation,” a concept that in its ideal
form implied cultural, political, and administrative incorporation of a colony
into the metropole. Yet the French were never willing to fully assimilate the
political and administrative structures of the Communes, despite the provision
of citizenship rights and elected institutions there. The concept of assimilation
therefore tended to manifest itself culturally, and as such it profoundly shaped
schooling. Curricula in the Communes generally approximated what metro-
politan schools offered and strongly emphasized French language and culture.31
By the 1850s, for example, the Ploërmel Brothers had begun providing a “Latin
Class” for the most advanced boys in their Saint-Louis school. In 1857, the
school’s director noted that fifteen students studied Latin and Greek in addi-
tion to their other academic subjects.32
By the end of the nineteenth century, however, many French officials had
moved away from assimilation. New, supposedly scientific theories about race
suggested that racial “character” was inherent and immutable, positioned
peoples in static racial hierarchies, and challenged the validity of using education
in an attempt to improve colonized peoples. Some sociologists and colonial
theorists proposed that colonialism should not alienate “natives” from their
own cultures, and this prompted shifts in rhetoric about the civilizing mission.
No longer focused on assimilation, the civilizing process would now help Africans
“evolve” in ways appropriate to their own cultures and customs. At the same
time, the French not only completed their conquest in Senegal but also con-
tinued to expand east, in 1895 forming the French West Africa federation to ad-
minister all of France’s West African holdings under one Government General.
Officials certainly never intended to offer citizenship rights, elected institutions,
or even full-fledged French culture to the millions of Africans in these new terri-
tories. They instead incorporated these Africans as colonial subjects, and, though
residents of the Communes retained their rights and political status, these
changes encouraged officials to call these privileges into question.33
18 Introduction
educated men across the territory and preparing the way for Diagne’s election
in 1914.
The interwar period ushered in more changes and offered new opportu-
nities to renegotiate relations between Africans and Europeans. Thousands of
Africans participated in World War I and II, and their status as veterans became
a basis for new claims on the colonial state. Furthermore, intellectuals from
French West Africa and the French Antilles engaged in the radical cultural
project of Negritude. Negritude thinkers worked to invert racist assumptions
about Africans and people of African descent and, in doing so, to reveal the
positive attributes and contributions of African cultures. Politically, these thinkers
tended not to call for political independence but instead to seek equality with
the French and additional opportunities for political participation within the
French empire. Even so, they put pressure on the French, pressure that was
compounded by the more openly anticolonial politics of a few Africans, like
Lamine Senghor. Following World War II and having realized that the in-
creasing politicization of colonial subjects and a declining world tolerance for
colonial rule posed serious threats to the French empire, French colonial officials
and planners began to undertake significant political and economic reform.
From 1946 to 1958, several laws did away with the distinction between citizen
and subject, gradually extended suffrage, greatly increased the autonomy avail-
able to each West African colony at the local level, and ultimately allowed each
territory to vote on whether or not to join a new French Community, which
would take the place of the empire. While Guinea became independent in 1958,
after its citizens voted against membership in the French Community, the
other colonies accepted France’s invitation. These colonies became independent
in 1960 as the French Community fell apart.38
Education policy reflected these larger political shifts. Although adapted
education came into its own during Georges Hardy’s tenure as the head of edu-
cation in French West Africa (1912–1919), officials redoubled their efforts after
World War I. Suspicious of the political ideologies of African intellectuals and
some veterans, officials placed greater emphasis on adapted education in order
to limit future numbers of educated elites. Even so, a metropolitan-style cur-
riculum remained available in at least some of the schools in the Communes.
Governor General Carde’s 1924 policy underscored the importance of adapted
education, increased the number of rural schools offering the most basic levels
of education, and reserved the better schools for select children, mostly sons of
important people. These reforms corresponded to concerns about educated
elites and to a renewed focus on the administrative potential of the “traditional”
chieftaincy. In 1930, Governor General Brévié undertook another school reform,
further promoting adapted education by requiring students in rural schools to
perform agricultural work for half of each school day. Despite their unpopularity,
Introduction 21
these rural schools that Brévié created functioned into the World War II era.
After World War II, however, faced with the risk of losing the empire altogether
and understanding that they would need to work with educated Africans to
undertake necessary political reforms, the French significantly improved edu-
cation in French West Africa. Postwar plans for promoting economic develop-
ment in the colonies included expansion of education and designated addi-
tional monies for this purpose. By the late 1940s, the education system in French
West Africa was organized like a French académie, and a 1950 reform created a
postsecondary school in Dakar that was linked to universities in Bordeaux and
in Paris. In 1957, this institution became the University of Dakar, preceding
Senegal’s independence by three years.39
The changes brought by two world wars, colonial policies that supported
investment in economic and human development, increased pressure from
Africans for full political inclusion, and the cultural nationalism of the Negritude
movement led Africans and Europeans to a new set of negotiations. These
negotiations involved not only the nature of the relationship between colonizer
and colonized but also the terms and future of colonial rule itself. The wars had
laid bare French dependence on the colonies and had provided Africans with
substantial leverage in seeking concessions from their rulers. Furthermore,
colonial schools had been around for several generations by this point, and
educated elites took up the mantle of cultural nationalism, underscoring the
importance of African identities and cultural contributions and at the same
time suggesting that Africans deserved full inclusion within French political
and national space.
Thus, a distinguishing feature of the 1850–1914 period is the newness of
colonialism. Indeed, it was precisely this newness and the dependence on Afri-
can intermediaries that it entailed that gave such punch—and even power—to
African reactions to institutions such as colonial schools. As such, during the
period before 1914, colonial schools presented innovative Africans with many
opportunities to respond creatively and productively to colonial rule. African
responses to these institutions reshaped politics in their own communities and
in the colony as a whole, they contributed to the emergence of a language of
race, they unsettled generational hierarchies and long-standing voting blocs,
and they ultimately made possible the campaign and election of Blaise Diagne
in 1914. It is to these African actors, their goals, and their strategies for attaining
them that the rest of this book now turns.
and debates that are the focus of this book. Not surprisingly, the archive is rela-
tively sparse with regard to female participation in or reactions to schooling
and politics. Though I discuss girls and women as the sources allow and as their
experiences seem relevant, the book focuses on boys and men. Thus, terms like
“Africans,” “elders,” and “young people,” among others, should be taken to
refer to boys and/or men, unless otherwise specified.
Part I of the book focuses on how specific adults—all of them possessing
some sort of local authority—initially reacted to the expansion of colonial
schooling into their communities. Their reactions made clear that more was at
stake in this expansion than the socialization and training of children. The first
chapter takes a rather different approach from the rest of the book, attempting
to describe African methods of education that existed before colonialism began
and that continued to function during the colonial period, albeit in increasingly
altered form. It explores how African educational practices intersected and
often competed with French schools, and it seeks to understand why a majority
of Africans rejected these colonial institutions. African education, which was
situated within the community and in the Qur’anic school, played a central
role as a force of social reproduction and as a basis for adult authority both
before and during colonialism. Convinced that their own methods of education
best served the communities’ priorities and needs, I argue, many parents decided
against sending their children to the French school. Children sometimes dis-
agreed, however, and attended school against their parents’ wishes, and the
chapter explores how colonial schools facilitated this youthful disobedience.
Chapter 2 explores the limitations of French educational capacity in the
late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, making the case that a lack of
adequate financial and human resources contributed to the failure of colonial
schools to compete successfully with Qur’anic schools. It argues further that
French attempts to address these problems by regulating Qur’anic schools
had the unintended consequence of politicizing Muslims, who rallied around
their religious schools and teachers. In chapter 3 I focus on chiefs, arguing that
although they lost many of their old privileges under colonial rule, they used
their influence over colonial schools in a bid to retain some authority. Relying
in particular on the experiences and correspondence of the formerly inde-
pendent kings of Siin and of Bawol and of members of aristocratic families in
Kayoor, I find that schooling invited chiefs to engage with and contribute to
emerging concepts of colonial chieftaincy. Taken together, these case studies
demonstrate that French schooling figured into various negotiations over
power and authority in colonial Senegal—some of them within African commu-
nities, others between Africans and French officials.
Part II addresses some of the political effects of school attendance, focusing
in particular on how schooling provided people—many of them children or
24 Introduction
A Word on Sources
This book is based on a wide variety of documentary sources, most of which
are held in archives in Senegal and France. In addition to the typical adminis-
trative correspondence and reports, my source base includes more than 250
letters written between 1885 and 1915 by Africans—chiefs, marabouts, parents,
teachers, and young people—on the subject of schooling. Though they form
part of a colonial archive, these letters allow me some insight into African re-
actions to French schools and their efforts to use such institutions for their own
ends. Such sources do not negate the problems of bias and perspective inherent
in colonial archives, but they, especially when combined with oral evidence,
allow some access to African voices.41
Indeed, the documentary evidence is complemented by material from
nearly forty interviews conducted in Gorée, Saint-Louis, Louga, and Mouit in
2007 and 2010. I spoke with several descendants of people who passed through
the School for Sons of Chiefs around the turn of the twentieth century about
their relatives’ experiences in this school. I also interviewed numerous retired
teachers about their own experiences in education and their knowledge of edu-
cation in the past. I came to teachers unintentionally; when I explained my
project to community members, they almost always directed me to retired
teachers as the most knowledgeable interlocutors on the subject of the history
of education in Senegal.42 Since the period predates the lived experiences of
the oldest elders in contemporary Senegal, I cannot use this material as the
main set of sources for a history of education in Senegal from the 1850s to 1914.
But it is useful in that it provides insight into the cultural context and into
Senegalese memories and interpretations of their past.
French colonial schools entered an already complex social and political
milieu in Senegal. Parents and Islamic teachers had claims on children’s time,
and these adults had much at stake in the process of turning children into pro-
ductive adults and good Muslims. At the same time, children had to acquire an
appropriate education in order to gain respect as adults in their communities.
The French administration introduced an outside element into this mix in the
form of colonial schools, and, while many people shunned them, others sought
to capitalize on the new institution. If some Africans used the French school to
help them react productively to the new colonial context, others attempted to
use it as a new resource in old contests of power and authority. These reactions
had important implications for African families and communities, they encour-
aged African engagement in colonial politics, and they were the precondition
for the development of the Young Senegalese and the success of Blaise Diagne
in 1914.
Part I
1
Education and Authority
29
30 Education and Authority
how at least some children decided to attend school against the wishes of their
parents or guardians.
In recent years, historians have offered nuanced studies of African efforts to
shape the experience of colonial schooling to suit their needs, of the importance
of schooling to elite identities, and of the uses to which political actors put the
literacy and status they gained from attending school. Implicit in these studies
and explicit in older ones, which tended to focus on the development of colo-
nial schooling as an institution, is the notion that only a minority of Africans
attended these schools, especially in the first decades of their operation. While
historians sometimes mention this fact, they do not typically provide evidence-
based explorations of why so many Africans initially turned away from colonial
schools.3 Furthermore, as Jean-Hervé Jézéquel notes, very few scholars con-
sider the decision-making processes and trajectories of particular families. For
that reason, we perhaps gain the best insights into these issues by reading novels
like Ambiguous Adventure or Weep Not, Child, which invite the reader to consider
the strategies and calculations that figured into an individual or family decision
to send a child to school.4 Although much of the rest of the present book focuses
on Africans who engaged with colonial schooling in one way or another—
though not necessarily by sending a child there—I thought it would be instruc-
tive to consider why others made a very different choice. Furthermore, serious
consideration of the rejection of the colonial school by so many and the only
partial acceptance of these schools by many more allows us to better under-
stand the political impact of colonial schooling on African communities, families,
and individuals, issues that I address in subsequent chapters. This chapter
attempts to explain why Africans initially stayed away from the French school
by focusing on what they had to lose: control over children and education and
the authority derived from that control.
Relying primarily on letters and reports from teachers who worked in
colonial schools from the 1890s to the 1910s, on other administrative corre-
spondence, and on a series of short ethnographic essays written by young men
from across Senegal who studied at the colony’s William Ponty Normal School
during the 1930s and 1940s, this chapter makes the case that Africans did not
simply reject French schools out of hand. Instead, they reacted in logical ways
that reflected an ongoing commitment to existing methods of education. These
methods focused on instilling appropriate values and manners; on teaching
children agriculture, fishing, or a skilled trade; and—often—on learning the
Qur’an and Muslim prayers and rituals. They had helped reproduce social
hierarchy, culture, economy, and religion for generations by socializing chil-
dren and by giving adults control over children’s conduct and labor during the
education process. Adults thus tended to keep children away from colonial
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
The Project Gutenberg eBook of Spirit of
Chambers's Journal
This ebook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United
States and most other parts of the world at no cost and with
almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away
or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License
included with this ebook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you
are not located in the United States, you will have to check the
laws of the country where you are located before using this
eBook.
Language: English
OF
CHAMBERS’S JOURNAL:
BY
EDINBURGH:
W. & R. CHAMBERS, WATERLOO PLACE; AND
ORR & SMITH, LONDON.
1834.
PRINTED BY W. & R. CHAMBERS, 19, WATERLOO PLACE, EDINBURGH.
NOTICE.
Page
Lady Jean, a Tale, 1
Fallacies of the Young.—“Fathers have Flinty Hearts,” 27
Bruntfield, a Tale of the Sixteenth Century, 32
The Passing Crowd, 41
A Tale of the Forty-Five, 44
Removals, 61
Victims, 71
Fallacies of the Young.—“Acquaintances,” 83
Subjects of Conversation, 86
Secure Ones, 89
To Scotland, 98
Story of Mrs Macfarlane, 100
The Downdraught, 118
Tale of the Silver Heart, 134
Cultivations, 152
Fits of Thrift, 157
Susan Hamilton, a Tale of Village Life, 163
Flitting Day, 182
Fallacies of the Young.—“Debtors and Creditors,” 193
General Invitations, 197
Confessors, 205
A Chapter of Political Economy, 209
The Drama, 214
Recognitions, 218
The Ladye that I Love, 226
Pay your Debt! 227
Children, 238
Tea-Drinking, 246
Husbands and Wives, 249
They, 255
Relations, 258
The Strangers’ Nook, 261
Nobody to be Despised, 265
Trust to Yourself, 270
Leisure, 275
My Native Bay, 278
Advancement in Life, 279
Controllers-General, 286
A Turn for Business, 291
Setting up, 296
Consuls, 303
Country and Town Acquaintances, 309
Where is my Trunk? 314
SPIRIT
OF
CHAMBERS’S JOURNAL.
had exercised their tender and delightful influence over her; like a
flower thrown upon one of the streams of her own native land, whose
course was through the beauties, the splendours, and the terrors of
nature, she was borne away in a dream, the magic scenery of which
was alternately pleasing, fearful, and glorious, and from which she
could no more wake than could the flower restrain its course on the
gliding waters. The habit of contemplating her lover every day, and
that in the dignified character of an instructor, gradually blinded her
in a great measure to his humbler quality, and to the probable
sentiments of her father and the world upon the subject of her
passion. If by any chance such a consideration was forced upon her
notice, and she found occasion to tremble lest the sentiments in
which she was so luxuriously indulging should end in disgrace and
disaster, she soon quieted her fears, by reverting to an idea which
had lately occurred to her—namely, that Richard was not what he
seemed. She had heard and read of love assuming strange
disguises. A Lord Belhaven, in the immediately preceding period of
the civil war, had taken refuge from the fury of Cromwell in the
service of an English nobleman, whose daughter’s heart he won
under the humble disguise of a gardener, and whom, on the
recurrence of better times, he carried home to Scotland as his lady.
This story was then quite popular, and at least one of the parties still
survived to attest its truth. But even in nursery tales Lady Jean could
find examples which justified her own passion. The vilest animals,
she knew, on finding some beautiful dame, who was so disinterested
as to fall in love with them, usually turned out to be the most
beautiful princes that ever were seen, and invariably married and
made happy the ladies whose affection had restored them to their
natural form and just inheritance. Who knows, she thought, but
Richard may some day, in a transport of passion, throw open his
coat, exhibit the star of nobility glittering on his breast, and ask me to
become a countess?
Such are the excuses which love suggests to reason, and which
the reason of lovers easily accepts; while those who are neither
youthful nor in love wonder at the hallucination of their impassioned
juniors. Experience soon teaches us that this world is not one of
romance, and that few incidents in life ever occur out of the ordinary
way. But before we acquire this experience by actual observation,
we all of us regard things in a very different light. The truth seems to
be, that, in the eyes of youth, “the days of chivalry” do not appear to
be “gone;” our ideas are then contemporary, or upon a par with the
early romantic ages of the world; and it is only by mingling with
mature men, and looking at things as they are, that we at length
advance towards, and ultimately settle down in, the real era of our
existence. Was there ever yet youth who did not feel some
chivalrous impulses—some thirst for more glorious scenes than
those around him—some aspirations after lofty passion and supreme
excellence—or who did not cherish some pure first-love, that could
not prudentially be gratified?
The greater part of the rest of the summer passed away before the
lovers came to an eclaircissement; and such, indeed, was their
mutual reserve upon the subject, that, had it not been for the
occurrence of a singular and deciding circumstance, there appeared
little probability of this ever otherwise taking place. The Earl of
Home, a gay and somewhat foolish young nobleman, one morning
after attending a convivial party where the charms of Lady Jean
Fleming formed the principal topic of discourse, left Edinburgh and
took the way to Cumbernauld, on the very pilgrimage, and with the
very purpose which Lord Wigton had before anticipated. Resolved
first to see, then to love, and lastly to run away with the young lady,
his lordship skulked about for a few days, and at last had the
pleasure of seeing the hidden beauty over the garden wall, as she
was walking with Master Richard. He thought he had never seen any
lady who could be at all compared to Lady Jean, and, as a matter of
course, resolved to make her his own, and surprise all his
companions at Edinburgh with his success and her beauty. He
watched again next day, and happening to meet Master Richard out
of the bounds of Cumbernauld policy, accosted him, with the
intention of securing his services in making his way towards Lady
Jean. After a few words of course, he proposed the subject to
Richard, and offered a considerable bribe, to induce him to work for
his interest. Richard at first rejected the offer, but immediately after,
on bethinking himself, saw fit to accept it. He was to mention his
lordship’s purpose to Lady Jean, and to prepare the way for a private
interview with her. On the afternoon of the succeeding day, he was to
meet Lord Home at the same place, and tell him how Lady Jean had
received his proposals. With this they parted—Richard to muse on
this unexpected circumstance, which he saw might blast all his
hopes unless he should resolve upon prompt and active measures,
and the Earl of Home to enjoy himself at the humble inn of the village
of Cumbernauld, where he had for the last few days enacted the
character of “the daft lad frae Edinburch, that seemed to ha’e mair
siller than sense.”
On the morning of the tenth day after Master Richard’s first
interview with Lord Home, that faithful serving-man found himself
jogging swiftly along the road to Edinburgh, mounted on a stout nag,