Instructions for using Quality of Services Data Analysis Sheet

Indicator Sheet:
- This sheet will automatically calculate the Quality of Services score for each service provider. This sheet is p

Data Sheet:
- Data should only be entered in white/active cells. All cells which have formulas have been made inactive/grey
- Column A: enter date assessment completed in dd/mm/yy format
- Column B: enter name of service provider
- Column C: enter location. For ease of analysis it is suggested that you use labels, i.e. that data is entered in
corresponds to the particular location. i.e. 201 = district 1, 202 = district 2. You will need define the specific loca
context.
- Columns D-F: select response from the drop-down list.
- Columns G-N: see suggested labels under 'multiple choice selection'. It is recommended that if the responde
a '1' is put in the relevant column(s).
- Columns O-AV: see 'indicator rating' options under suggested labels sheet. For each indicator (i.e. 1.1, 2.1, 2
number for the rating (i.e. 3=achieved). For formulas used in this sheet to be correct the suggested labels must
are protected and will calculate the average score for the standard.
- Column AW: this column is protected. It will automatically calculate the average indicator rating score of the s
calculation.

Suggested Labels Sheet:

- this includes the suggested numbering system to be used under 'name' for the corresponding response optio
questionnaire. Examples are included above. It is important that for Columns O-AV that the numbering convent
used so that the formulas used in the sheet are correct.

Pivot Table:
- these tabs are a Pivot table builder and can be used for additional analysis as needed. For example, if you w
columns by the results of other columns (i.e. service provider rating score by years of support from SC).
Analysis Sheet

ce provider. This sheet is protected/inactive to protect formulas.

ve been made inactive/greyed out.

i.e. that data is entered in a number format and that

eed define the specific location labels (i.e. districts) for your

ended that if the respondent has selected the response option

ch indicator (i.e. 1.1, 2.1, 2.2, etc) insert the corresponding

the suggested labels must be used. All STD_Rating columns

dicator rating score of the service provider for the indicator

responding response option under 'label' from the

hat the numbering convention in the suggested labels sheet is

ded. For example, if you want to cut the results of certain

of support from SC).
 Name of Service Type of Service
Date (dd/mm/yy) Location
Provider Provider
6/05/24 Bahay Rehab Pag-asa 101 National (local) N
6/05/24 Bernardo Valderaz 102 National (local) N
6/05/24 Marjorie Chavez (BHW) 103 Government
6/05/24 CARLOS A._VAWC 104 Government
 Type of Service Length of SC Support Support Support
Assessed Support type_training type_technical type_financial
Response Less than 1 year 0 1 0
Both Less than 1 year 1 1 1
Response 1-2 years 0 0 1
Both 1-2 years 0 0 0
 Support Support Support Support Support
type_institutional type_planning type_advocacy type_M&E type_other
0 0 0 0 0
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
Standard 1 Standard 2 Standard 3 Standard 4
STD1_ STD2_ STD3_
1.1 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 3.1 4.1
Rating Rating Rating
1 1.00 1 1 3 2 1.75 4 4.00 4
4 4.00 4 3 3 4 3.50 4 4.00 4
2 2.00 1 2 1 1 1.25 0 0.00 2
1 1.00 1 2 3 4 2.50 0 0.00 1
Standard 4 Standard 5 Standard 6 Standard 7
STD4_ STD5_ STD6_ STD7_
5.1 5.2 5.3 6.1 6.2 7.1
Rating Rating Rating Rating
4.00 3 3 3 3.00 3 2 2.50 2 2.00
4.00 4 4 4 4.00 4 4 4.00 4 4.00
2.00 1 2 2 1.67 3 2 2.50 2 2.00
1.00 1 2 3 2.00 1 2 1.50 3 3.00
 Standard 8 Standard 9
STD8_ STD9_
8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 8.5 8.6 9.1 9.2
Rating Rating
3 2 3 3 3 2 2.67 2 2 2.00
4 4 3 4 4 4 3.83 4 4 4.00
0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 2.00
0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 1 3 2.00
 Standard 10
STD10_ Overall Service
10.1 10.2 10.3
Rating Provider Rating
3 2 2 2.33 2.53
4 3 4 3.67 3.90
2 2 4 2.67 1.61
2 2 1 1.67 1.47
 Name of Service Type of Service Type of Service
Date (dd/mm/yy) Location
Provider Provider Assessed
6/05/24 FRED CALOS(RSW 105 Child protection co Both
6/05/24 JHE GANDA 101 Child protection co Both
6/05/24 FREDATORA 103 Child protection focPrevention
6/05/24 GERALD 104 Community voluntee Prevention
 Length of SC Support Support Support Support
Support type_training type_technical type_financial type_institutional
Less than 1 year 0 0 0 0
5+ years 1 1 1 1
1-2 years 0 1 0 0
Less than 1 year 1 1 0 1
 Standard 1
Support type_gov Support Support Support STD1_
1.1
linkages type_advocacy type_M&E type_other Rating
0 0 0 0 4 4.00
1 1 1 1 4 4.00
0 0 0 0 3 3.00
1 1 1 0 3 3.00
 Standard 2 Standard 3 Standard 4
STD2_ STD3_
2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 3.1 3.2 4.1 4.2
Rating Rating
3 4 4 3 3.50 4 3 3.50 3 3
4 4 4 4 4.00 4 4 4.00 4 4
2 3 2 1 2.00 1 2 1.50 2 4
1 2 2 3 2.00 1 2 1.50 1 3
Standard 4 Standard 5 Standard 6 Standard 7 Standard 8
STD4_ STD5_ STD6_ STD7_
5.1 6.1 6.2 7.1 7.2 8.1
Rating Rating Rating Rating
3.00 4 4.00 4 4 4.00 4 4 4.00 2
4.00 4 4.00 4 4 4.00 4 4 4.00 4
3.00 2 2.00 3 4 3.50 2 1 1.50 2
2.00 3 3.00 3 3 3.00 2 1 1.50 1
Standard 8 Standard 9 Standard 10
STD8_ STD9_ STD10_
8.2 8.3 9.1 10.1 10.2 10.3
Rating Rating Rating
3 3 2.67 4 4.00 3 3 4 3.33
4 4 4.00 4 4.00 4 4 4 4.00
4 2 2.67 2 2.00 3 2 4 3.00
3 3 2.33 2 2.00 1 3 3 2.33
Overall Service
Provider Rating
3.60
4.00
2.42
2.27
 List name Name Label

Location 101 Brgy. 176

Location 102 Brgy. 139
Location 103 Brgy. Longos
Location 104 Brgy. Tonsuya
Location 105 Tanza 1
Location 106 Tanza 2

Etc… Etc… Etc…

Multiple Choice 0/blank Not selected

Selection 1 Response selected

1 Indicator not achieved

2 Indicator partially achieved
Indicator Rating
3 Indicator is achieved
4 Indicator is exceeded
STD1_ Rating 1.1 Count of Name of Service Provider
1.00 2
1 2
2.00 1
2 1
4.00 1
4 1
(empty)
(empty)
Total Result 4
(empty) Name of Service Provider
STD1_ Rating STD2_ Rating Bahay Rehab Pag-asBernardo Valderaz CARLOS A._VAWC
1.00
1.75
2.50
2.00
1.25
4.00
3.50
Total Result
Marjorie ChaTotal Result
(empty)