Chandrika 2015

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics 132 (2015) 33–36

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics


journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jastp

Short Communication

Review and testing analysis of Moupfouma rain rate model for


Southern India
Chandrika P.a,n, Vijaya Bhaskara Rao S.a, Kirankumar N.V.P.b, Narayana Rao T.c
a
Department of Physics, Sri Venkateswara University, Tirupati 517502, India
b
Space Physics Laboratory, Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre, Trivandrum 695022, India
c
National Atmospheric Research Laboratory, Gadanki 517112, India

art ic l e i nf o a b s t r a c t

Article history: Suitability of the analytical model by Moupfouma in modeling the one-minute rain rate distributions at
Received 1 April 2015 tropical stations of Thiruvananthapuram and Gadanki is studied. The Climatic dependent parameters of
Received in revised form the model governing the slope of the one-minute rain rate distributions are acclimatized and validated.
17 June 2015
The paper also presents rain rate distributions for Thiruvananthapuram and Gadanki. Performance of the
Accepted 18 June 2015
model with newly refined climatic dependent parameters is assessed. The Moupfouma model is ob-
Available online 24 June 2015
served to model the one minute rain rate distributions with a maximum percentage relative error of 14%
Keywords: at 0.001% of time, and with approximately zero relative error at 0.01% of time in an average year. The
Rain rate distribution modeling climatic dependent parameters governing the slope of one-minute rain rate distributions are proposed
Moupfouma model
for Southern India.
Refined climatic parameters
& 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

1. Introduction rate database mainly from meteorological stations is with longer


integration times thus necessitating suitable models for conver-
Rain attenuation, signal degradation due to absorption and sion to one-minute rain rate distributions. Analytical model to date
scattering of microwave energy by rain drops, is the primary cause proposed by Moupfouma and Martin (1993) is illustrated as an
of concern for satellite links operating at and above 10 GHz. Sa- appropriate and viable model for tropics (Ong and Zhu, 1997;
tellite communications are on the verge of transition to higher Chebil and Rahman, 1999; Alwarfalli, 2005; Ojo et al., 2009;
frequencies above Ku band due to increasing demand for band- Mandeep, 2011; Ojo and Omotosho, 2013).
width requirements owing to developments in the complex mul-
timedia applications. The advent of higher frequencies into a sa-
tellite era ushered the pragmatic necessity for second order sta- 2. Moupfouma model
tistics into system design paradigm (Panagopoulos et al., 2009).
Second order statistics of fade slope, fade duration, and interfade Moupfouma and Martin (1993) (hereafter simply referred to as
duration can be estimated from time series of attenuation only. Moupfouma model) proposed an analytical model that models the
The attenuation time series synthesizers developed by Lacoste rain rate cumulative distribution with a lognormal behavior at low
et al. (2005) employ the first order rain rate and rain attenuation precipitation rates and as a gamma distribution at high rain rates
statistics as the primary inputs. First order statistics of rain rate
using the one-minute rainfall rate at 0.01% of the time. The pre-
and rain attenuation determine the link margins for the services.
eminence of the model lies in the devised functional form of the
The one-minute rain rate statistics provide an insight into the
slope of the distribution including the climatic zone complexities
propagation characteristics and are a significant contribution to
of tropics and temperate regions. They recommended improve-
attenuation modeling (ITU-R P.837-6, 2012). One-minute rain rate
ment in parameters λ and γ governing the slope of the cumulative
database is scarce owing to the purposeful recordings for micro-
distribution for tropical regions using experimental observations.
wave communication studies at few locations only. The large rain
The rain rate cumulative distribution function is given as

n ⎛ R 0.01 + 1 ⎞b u R − r − log ⎡104⎤


Corresponding author. P (R ≥ r ) = 100 ⎜ ⎟ e ( 0.01 ) e⎣ ⎦,
E-mail addresses: chandrika.panigrahi@gmail.com (P. Chandrika), ⎝ r+1 ⎠ (1)
drsvbr.acas@gmail.com (S. Vijaya Bhaskara Rao),
kirannvp@gmail.com (N.V.P. Kirankumar), tnrao@narl.gov.in (T. Narayana Rao). where r (mm/hr) is the observed rain rate, R0.01 (mm/hr) is the

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2015.06.010
1364-6826/& 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
34 P. Chandrika et al. / Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics 132 (2015) 33–36

one-minute integration time rain rate exceeded for P¼ 0.01% of


time, b accounts for the shape, and u governs the slope of the
cumulative distribution. Parameters b, and u (for tropics) are ex-
pressed as
⎛ r ⎞ ⎛ r ⎞
b=⎜ − 1⎟ log e ⎜1 + ⎟,
⎝ RP ⎠ ⎝ RP ⎠ (2)

log e [P (R P )] ⎛ ⎛ r ⎞γ ⎞
u=− exp ⎜⎜−λ ⎜ ⎟ ⎟⎟,
RP ⎝ ⎝ RP ⎠ ⎠ (3)

where RP is the rainfall rate exceeded for the probability P, and P(RP)
is the probability that rain rate exceeded RP, λ and γ are climatic
dependent parameters.
Moupfouma using the data from Ile-Ife (Nigeria), PK-45 in
Congo-Brazzaville, Hong-Kong, Ipoh (Malaysia), Ho chi Minh City
(Vietnam), Miami U.S.A., Brasilia (Brazil) and Darwin derived the
climatic dependent parameters for the tropics (λ ¼1.066 and
γ ¼0.214). Ong and Zhu (1997) refined the climatic parameters for
Singapore region. Chebil and Rahman (1999) presented λ and γ
using experimental cumulative distributions at Malaysia, Singa-
pore, and Indonesia by considering the mean annual rainfall ac-
cumulation as the deciding criteria. Ojo et al. (2009) redefined the
climatic parameters of the Moupfouma model to suit Nigeria. In
the light of these reported results, Moupfouma model climatic Fig. 1. Scatter plot of the u(r) and rain rate (r) of the averaged year distribution and
dependent parameters need refinement to suit Indian region. the corresponding fit of the proposed climatic dependent parameters.

Fig. 1. The climatic dependent parameters λ and γ obtained


3. Database through the fit are λ ¼ 0.7983 and γ ¼0.02129. The Pearson's cor-
relation coefficient r2 of the fit obtained is 0.9834 for 308 degrees
The database for the present work is from impact type disd- of freedom with a root mean square error of 0.0008.
rometers (RD-80 model by Distromet Ltd., Switzer-land) located at The yearly and averaged one-minute distributions are observed
a tropical coastal station, Thiruvananthapuram (8.5°N, 76.9°E) and to be best modeled with climatic dependent coefficients derived
an Inland tropical station, Gadanki (13.5°N, 79.2°E). One-minute from the averaged year distribution. Typical plot of the averaged
rain rates estimated from the disdrometer during the period years one-minute rain rate distribution and Moupfouma modeled-
2007–2011 and 2013 constitute the database for the present study. distribution with newly refined λ and γ are shown in Fig. 2. It can
The rainfall accumulation measured by the disdrometer is in good be observed that Moupfouma model range of predictability is
agreement with that of the co-located tipping bucket rain gauge 0.001% rP% o1%. Percentage relative errors of the modeled dis-
measurements. Intercomparison and performance of the disd- tributions are presented as a performance criterion for the
rometers located at these sites were discussed by Kirankumar and Moupfouma model. Percentage relative error is calculated using
Kunhikrishnan (2013) and Rao et al. (2009). the expression (Chun and Mandeep, 2013)

ε rel % =
(R predicted − Rmeasured ) × 100
R measured (4)
4. Results
Percentage relative errors for each year and average year dis-
The cumulative distribution of the one-minute rain rates is tributions modeled using λ ¼0.7983 and γ ¼ 0.02129 are presented
obtained for each year and average of six years using Thir- in Table 2. The positive percentage relative error can be considered
uvananthapuram disdrometric data. Using the Eqs. (1) and (2), as the overestimation and negative as underestimation by the
parameter u is determined. Nonlinear least squares fitting using model.
Levenberg–Marquardt Algorithm is employed to fit the calculated It can be observed that the modeled distribution is replicating
u values with Eq. (3) to determine λ and γ values. The climatic the observed distribution with relative errors of 710% at P ¼0.1%
dependent parameters λ and γ derived for each year and also the and 715% at P ¼0.001%. The maximum percentage relative error
average are presented in Table 1. It can be observed that γ is at P ¼0.01% is  1.26%. It is clearly demonstrated that Moupfouma
sometimes negative owing to the behavior of the one-minute model with newly refined λ and γ better replicates the observed
distribution being narrower at highest probabilities and broader at distribution. Consequently, λ ¼0.7983 and γ ¼0.02129 are the
lower probabilities. The scatter plot of the u(r) versus r of the newly proposed climatic dependent parameters for the Thir-
averaged year distribution and the corresponding fit is shown in uvananthapuram region.

Table 1
Moupfouma climatic parameters for Thiruvananthapuram.

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2013 Average


R0.01 mm/hr 78.5 76.0 79.5 53.5 71.5 83.5 76.0

λ 0.6961 0.7641 0.6525 0.8981 0.6173 0.8735 0.7983


γ  0.05077  0.05129  0.12010 0.09797  0.09730 0.11380 0.02129
P. Chandrika et al. / Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics 132 (2015) 33–36 35

Table 3
Percentage relative error for one min. Moupfouma modeling for Gadanki with
λ¼ 0.7983 and γ ¼ 0.02129.

P% 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2013 Average

0.1 27.91 51.72 63.33 20.75 12.96 43.33 35.00


0.01 0.74 0.93 0.00 0.00 0.67 0.00 0.00
0.001 11.17 5.88  0.81 11.38 7.92  5.10 2.57

modeled are depicted in Fig. 3. It can be observed that the


Moupfouma distribution is replicating the observations well in the
range of P ¼0.02–0.001%, whereas it is majorly overestimating in
the range of P ¼0.9–0.02%. This overestimation can be attributed to
the fact that Gadanki is an Inland station wherein observed rain
rate distribution is narrower up to PZ 0.04% from P ¼1%, and it
becomes broader in the range 0.001% rP% o 0.04%. The relative
error percentages of modeled in replicating the observed are cal-
culated and presented in Table 3.
The Moupfouma model is observed to overestimate the dis-
tribution by a rate of 1% at P¼ 0.01%. However, at P ¼0.001% the
observed rate of overestimation is 11% and underestimation is 5%.
It can be observed that the error rate is 60% at P¼ 0.1%.
From the measured rain rate distributions, it is observed that
R0.01 of an average year is 75.5 mm/hr at Thiruvananthapuram and
Fig. 2. Rain rate distribution of Thiruvananthapuram.
is 67 mm/hr at Gadanki. The rain rate exceeded at P¼ 0.001% time
in an average year, R0.001 is 110 mm/hr at Thiruvananthapuram and
Table 2 is 98 mm/hr at Gadanki.
Percentage relative error for one min. Moupfouma modeling Thiruvananthapuram.

P% 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2013 Average


5. Conclusions
0.1  1.54 10.71 3.17 5.00  9.37  1.45 3.39
0.01  0.64 0.00  1.26 0.00  0.71 0.00 0.00 Moupfouma model climatic dependent parameters governing
0.001 10.70 3.51 14.71  1.85 9.33  10.60 4.57
the slope of one-minute rain rate distribution are acclimatized and
are observed to be very much different from that proposed for
other tropical countries. Moupfouma model was also observed to
follow the observed yearly rain rate distributions with a good level
of confidence, making it a reliable model for the regions without
long-term measurements. Moupfouma model with the newly
proposed parameters is observed to model well the one-minute
rain rate distribution at Gadanki, an Inland station, with obvious
differences in the highest percentage of time in an averaged year.
Thus, we propose the climatic dependent parameters λ ¼ 0.7983
and γ ¼0.02129 that govern the slope of the distribution within the
range of 0.001%rP% o0.8%. At Gadanki, the Moupfouma model
reliability is more in the range of 0.001% rP% o0.04%. This work
proposes and validates the Moupfouma model climatic dependent
parameters vital for one-minute rain rate distribution estimation.
Potential employment of these results is in estimating the pro-
pagation losses due to rain using the attenuation prediction
models for Ka band and also indirectly in rain fade time series
synthesizers.

References

Ayman, A.A., Alwarfalli, 2005. The effect of Rain Rate modeling for the Prediction of
satellite propagation in Malaysia. Thesis Submitted to Faculty of Electrical En-
gineering, University Teknologi Malaysia.
Chebil, J., Rahman, T.A., 1999. Development of 1 min rain rate contour maps for
microwave applications in Malaysian peninsula. Electron. Lett. 35 (20),
Fig. 3. Rain rate distribution of Gadanki. 1772–1774.
Chun, O.W., Mandeep, J.S., 2013. Empirical methods for converting rainfall rate
distribution from several higher integration times into a 1-minute integration
The refined climatic dependent parameters λ and γ are vali- time in Malaysia. Geofizika 30, 143–154.
ITU-R P.837-6., 2012. Characteristics of Precipitation for Propagation Modelling.
dated using Gadanki disdrometric data. The one-minute rain rate Kirankumar, N.V.P., Kunhikrishnan, P.K., 2013. Evaluation of performance of Micro
distributions for the average year of Gadanki, observed and Rain Radar over the tropical coastal station Thumba (8.5°N, 76.9°E). Atmos. Res.
36 P. Chandrika et al. / Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics 132 (2015) 33–36

134, 56–63. satellite data and raingauge data for microwave applications in Nigeria. J. At-
Lacoste, F., Bousquet, M., Castanet, L., Cornet, F., Lemorton, J., 2005. Improvement of mos. Sol.-Terr. Phys. 102, 17–25.
the ONERA-CNES rain attenuation time series synthesizer and validation of the Ojo, J.S., Ajewole, M.O., Emiliani, L.D., 2009. One-minute rain-rate contour maps for
dynamic characteristics of the generated fade events. Space Commun. 20, microwave-communication-system planning in a tropical country: Nigeria.
45–59. Antennas Propag. Mag. IEEE 51, 82–89.
Mandeep, J.S., 2011. Comparison of rain rate models for equatorial climate in South Ong, J.T., Zhu, C.N., 1997. Rain rate measurements by a rain gauge network in
East Asia. Geofizika 28 (2), 265–274. Singapore. Electron. Lett. 33 (3), 240–242.
Moupfouma, F., Martin, L., 1993. Point rainfall rate cumulative distribution function Panagopoulos, A.D., Arapoglou, P.D.M., Cottis, P.G., 2009. Satellite Communications
valid at various locations. Electron. Lett. Vol. 29 (17), 1503–1505. at Ku, Ka and V bands: propagation impairments and mitigation techniques.
Rao, T.N., Radhakrishna, B., Nakamura, K., Rao, N.P., 2009. Differences in raindrop Commun. Surv. Tutor. IEEE 6, 2–14.
size distribution from southwest monsoon to northeast monsoon at Gadanki. Q.
J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 135, 1630–1637.
Ojo, J.S., Omotosho, T.V., 2013. Comparison of 1-min rain rate derived from TRMM

You might also like