West Yangon Technological University

Department Of Civil Engineering

Comparative Study On Analysis Of Ten-Storyed Reinforced Concrete Building

With And Without Shear Wall Under Two Different Seismic Zones

Third Webinar

PRESENTED BY
AYE NA DI
SUPERVISED BY
VI C – 37
Daw Le Yee Mon 1.7.2020
Outlines
• Introduction

• Problem statement

• Objectives

• Scope of the study

• Implementation program

• Literature review

• Case study

• Stability checking

• Comparison of the results

• Discussion and conclusion

• Recommendation

• References

1
Introduction

In developing countries, a lot of high-rise buildings are needed to solve the problem of

increasing population. These building structures must be designed safely and economically to resist

various types of including gravity and lateral loads. Among lateral loads, seismic load is emphasized in

this study.

2
Problem statement

1. Since Myanmar is located in the earthquake zone , earthquake effects should be considered as an

important factor.

2. The sizes of the members such as column and beam are bigger in the high rise buildings, so we can use

shear walls as vertical structural element to resist lateral loads. The provision of shear wall in building

has been found effective and economical.

3. When the buildings are higher, the steel area required is also heavy. And there are lots of congestions

at the joints and it is difficult to place and vibrate concrete at those places. Shear wall can be used to

avoid collapse of the building and form an efficient lateral force resisting system.

3
Objectives of study

1. To study the effect of different seismic zones on the building structure.

2. To be able to use the required building codes and specifications for practical design.

3. To study comparative performance of the reinforced concrete building under different seismic zones

with both shear wall inclusive and exclusive.

4
Scope of the study

• Studying structural elements of the building is aided by ETABS ( 9.7.1 )

• Design specification are based on ACI 318-05.

• Live loads and lateral loads are based on MNBC 2016.

• The proposed building is considered to be located on Yangon and Mandalay.

5
Implementation program

(1) Comparative study on analysis

of 10 - storeyed RCC building (2) Study on background theory
(3) Select the proposed building plan
with and without shear wall under and ETABS software
different seismic zones

6
Implementation program ( continued )

(4) Assume member size and column

arrangement without shear wall (8) Replace loading data for Mandalay with shear
for Mandalay wall and for Yangon without and without shear wall

(5) Modelling and preparation for analysis (9) Modelling and preparation for analysis

(6) Analysis of the proposed building (10) Analysis of the proposed building

OK
Not OK OK

(11) Stability checking

(7) Stability checking

(12) Comparison of the analysis

Not OK OK results of all four strucutres
7
Structural system
• The term structural system or structural frame refers to the load resisting system of a building or a
project. Generally, the structural systems can be classified as ;
1. Bearing wall systems
2. Building frame systems
3. Moment-resisting frame systems
4. Dual system
5. Other systems
• The structural system of the high rise building is designed to withstand the gravity loads as well as
lateral loads caused by wind or seismic activity.
• The structural system consists only of the members designed to carry loads, and all other members are
referred to as non structural.

Moment resisting frame is chosen for this study

8
Moment resisting frame

• Moment resisting frames are the structure having the traditional beam –
column framing , with the beams rigidly connected to the columns.
• It resists to lateral loads by rigid frame action –developing the bending
moment and shear force in the frame members and joints.
• Types of moment resisting frame are
1. Ordinary moment resisting frame
2. Intermediate moment resisting frame
3. Special moment resisting frame

Fig. 1 Moment resisting frame

According to MNBC 2016, special moment resisting frame is used for both
Yangon ( SDC D ) and Mandalay ( SDC E ) in this study.
9
Shear wall
Frame action obtained by the interaction of beams and
columns is not enough to give the required lateral stiffness for
high rise buildings.
Shear walls are vertical structural elements and the advantages
of shear walls are
• resist both gravity and lateral loads
• provide stiffness to the building.
• reduce the lateral sway.
• efficient in terms of construction cost and effectiveness in
minimizing earthquake damage
Fig.2 Types of shear wall
• increase building stability

10
Provision for seismic loading data

Site class
• MNBC 2016 described that the soil properties data are not known in sufficient details to determine
the site class , site class D shall be used.
• So Site Class D is used for this study.

Seismic design category ( SDC )

According to MNBC 2016 ,

• For Mandalay , S1 ( spectral response acceleration parameter ) is 0.8 which is greater than 0.75 so
the structure is assigned to SDC E.
• For Yangon , Ss = 0.77 and S1 = 0.31 so SDC D is assigned according to formula and site class D .

11
Structural Stability checking

After the structure is analyzed, the stability should be checked to determine whether the structure
is stable or not. Generally, most of the structure are considered with six stability checks. They are ;

1. Torsional irregularity
2. Storey drift
3. P-delta effect
4. Overturning moment
5. Sliding
6. Base shear

12
(1) Torsional irregularity

• When a building is subjected to a lateral force, the building tends to rotate at a certain movement.

This movement will create lateral forces at each level and twist the building.

• The ratio of the maximum displacement to average displacement should be less than 1.2.

∆
≤ 1.2
∆

Where, ∆max = maximum displacement between selected four points

∆avg = average displacement between selected four points

13
(2) Story drift
• Story drift of the building can be defined as the horizontal displacement of the building with respect to its
base when subjected to horizontal forces such as wind and earthquake loads.
• For building structure comprised solely of moment resisting frame assigned to SDC D, E or F, the design
storey drift shall not be grater than ∆a / p.
∆s < ∆a / p
where , ∆s = design storey drift
= storey drift x storey height
∆a = allowable storey drift
= 0.02 x storey height
p = redundancy factor ( = 1.3 for SDC D, E and F )
• For other structure, ∆max should be less than equal to 0.02 times of the storey height.
∆max = Cd ∆s / I
14
(3) P delta

• P delta effect refers to the sudden change in ground shear, overturning moment and the axial force

distribution at the base of the structure. P delta effect typically involves large external forces upon

relatively small displacements.

• MNBC states that the stability coefficient Ɵ is equal to or less than 0.1.

∆
Ɵ = Vx
ℎ

where, Px = total weight of the structure

∆s = design storey drift

Vx= seismic base shear

15
(4) Overturning moment

• Overturning moment are those applied moments, shears, and uplift forces that cause the structure to
become unstable and turn over. The distribution of earthquake forces over the height of the structure
causes the structure to experience overturning effects.
• The ratio of resisting moments to overturning moment should be greater than equal to 1.5.

SF = ≥ 1.5

where , Mr = Resisting moment

= 0.9 x weight of the structure x center of mass
Mo = Overturning moment

16
(5) Sliding

• Sliding failure causes the wall to move and separate from the backfill, due to the shearing failure at

the wall base.

• The safety factor for sliding is the ratio of sliding resistance to the sliding causing force. It should be

greater than 1.5.

SF =

Resisting force due to friction = 0.9 x weight of the structure x µ

Where , µ = friction coefficient ( 0.3 for concrete to soil )

17
(6) Base shear

• Base shear is the total design lateral force or shear at the base of the structure.
• Total design shear at the base of the structure can be calculated by the formula;
V = Cs W
where, Cs = seismic response coefficient

= 𝑥𝐼

However, Cs = 𝑥𝐼 ( for T ≤ 𝑇 )

Cs = 𝑥 𝑇 𝑥 𝐼 ( for T > 𝑇 )

where, T = the fundamental period of the structure

𝑇 = the long period transition period
18
Configuration of the proposed building

• Location - Yangon and Mandalay

• Type - 10 storeyed reinforced concrete building

• Types of occupancy - Residential building

• Size and shape - 61 ft x 48 ft ( Rectangular shape )

• Ground floor height - 13ft

• Typical story height - 10ft

• Total height - 125 ft

• Seismic design category - D ( Yangon ) and E ( Mandalay )

Fig. 3 3D view of the proposed building

19
Architectural and structural plan of the proposed building

Fig. 4a Architectural plan Fig. 4b Structural plan

20
Material properties for the structural members

• Cylinder design strength of concrete, fc’ = 4000 psi

• Yield strength for longitudinal reinforcement, Fy = 60000 psi
• Yield strength for shear reinforcement, Fys = 60000 psi
• Unit weight of concrete = 150 pcf
• Modulus of elasticity = 3600 ksi
• Poisson ratio = 0.2

21
Load consideration
Loads include gravity loads ( dead loads, superimposed dead load, live load) and lateral loads
( wind loads and earthquake loads). All loads cases are considered according to specification.

Dead load Live load

• Unit weight of concrete = 150 pcf
• Floor live load = 40 psf
• Finishing load = 20 psf
• Roof live load = 20 psf
• 4.5” thick wall load = 50 psf
• Stair live load = 100 psf
Seismic load • Rain load = 20 psf
• Lift load = 3000 lb
• Zone = Yangon and Mandalay
• Soil type = D Wind load
• Important factor = 1
• Exposure type = B
• Over strength factor, R = 8
• Effective height = 100ft
• Deflection amplification factor, Cd = 5.5
• Windward coefficient = 0.8
• Long period transition period, 𝑇 = 6s
• Leeward coefficient = 0.41
• For Yangon, Ss = 0.77 and S1 = 0.31
• Wind speed for Yangon = 100 mph
• For Mandalay, Ss = 2.01 and S1 = 0.8
for Mandalay = 80 mph 22
Load Combination

According to MNBC, load combinations are as follow,

1) 1.4 DL 12) 1.2 DL - 1.0 EQX + 1.0 LL

2) 1.2 DL + 1.6 LL 13) 1.2 DL + 1.0 EQY + 1.0 LL
3) 1.2 DL + 0.8 WX 14) 1.2 DL - 1.0 EQY + 1.0 LL
4) 1.2 DL - 0.8 WX 15) 0.9 DL + 1.6 WX
5) 1.2 DL + 0.8 WY 16) 0.9 DL - 1.6 WX DL= Dead Load
6) 1.2 DL - 0.8 WY 17) 0.9 DL + 1.6 WY LL= Live Load
7) 1.2 DL + 1.6 WX + 1.0 LL 18) 0.9 DL - 1.6 WY WX=Wind load according to X direction
8) 1.2 DL - 1.6 WX + 1.0 LL 19) 0.9 DL + 1.0 EQX WY=Wind load according to Y direction
9) 1.2 DL + 1.6 WY + 1.0 LL 20) 0.9 DL - 1.0 EQX EQX=Earthquake load according to X direction
10) 1.2 DL - 1.6 WX + 1.0 LL 21) 0.9 DL + 1.0 EQY EQY=Earthquake load according to Y direction
11) DL + 1.0 EQX + 1.0 LL 22) 0.9 DL - 1.0 EQY
23
Column arrangement of the proposed building

Name Floor level Section

C1 C2 C2 C2 C1
GF – 4F 20 x 22
C1 5F-7F 18X20
C2 C3 C3 C3 C2
8F-RF 16X18
C3 C3 GF – 4F 20x20
C2 C3 C3 C2 C2 5F – 7F 18x18
8F-RF 16X16

C2 C3 C3 C3 C3 GF – 4F 22 x 22
C2
C3 5F – 7F 20 x 20

8F-RT 18X18

C1 C2 C2 C2 C2 C1
24
Beam plan of the proposed building

Beam name Section Level

B1 10 x 12
B2 12 x 14
B3 12 x 18
B4 12 x 16 For all levels
B5 20 x 22
B6 16 x 18
B7 14 x 18

Ground to Roof Floor Beam Layout plan 25

Slab plan of the proposed building

Name Size Thickness Assignment

Slab 9 Slab 10 Slab 11 Slab 10 Slab 9
Slab 1 16.5’ x 14’ 4.5” TW1
Slab 2 16.5’ x 8’ 4.5” TW1 Slab 8 Slab 12
Slab 4 Slab 8 Slab 4
Slab 3 16.5’ x 9.5’ 4.5” TW1
Slab 4 16.5’ x 8.5’ 4.5” TW1
Slab 3 Slab 7 Slab 7 Slab 3
Slab 5 10’ x 14’ 4.5” TW1
Slab 6 10’ x 8’ 4.5” TW1
Slab 7 14’ x 9.5’ 4.5” TW1 Slab 2 Slab 6 Slab 6 Slab 2
Slab 8 10’ x 8.5’ 4.5” TW1
Slab 9 16.5’ x 4’ 4.5” TW1 Slab 11
Slab 10 10’ x 4’ 4.5” TW1 Slab 1 Slab 5 Slab 5 Slab 1
Slab 11 8’ x 4’ 7” Stair 7
Slab 12 4’ x 8.5’ 7” Stair 7
Slab 9 Slab 10 Slab 11 Slab 10 Slab 9

26
Stability checking

There are many different stability designs for every structural building. In this study, lateral
stability design is specially considered for the whole building structure. These are;
1. Torsional irregularity
2. Story drift
3. P-delta effect
4. Overturning moment
5. Sliding
6. Base shear

27
Torsional irregularity checking

21 32

Point 20,21,31 and 32 are selected for

torsional irregularity checking as these
four points are the corner point of the
building

20 31
28
Torsional irregularity checking for Mandalay
Without shear wall in X direction Without shear wall in Y direction
Point Point Point Point Maximum Average Max Point Point Point Point Maximum Max
Storey Remark Storey Avg: disp; Remark
20 31 21 32 disp; Dis; Avg 20 31 21 32 disp; Avg
RF 2.5016 2.5016 2.6792 2.6792 2.6792 2.5904 1.03 OK RF 2.9991 2.998 2.9991 2.998 2.9991 2.9991 1 OK
9F 2.4045 2.4045 2.5965 2.5965 2.5965 2.5005 1.03 OK 9F 2.8581 2.8575 2.8581 2.8575 2.8581 2.8581 1 OK
8F 2.2603 2.2603 2.4594 2.4594 2.4594 2.3599 1.04 OK 8F 2.67 2.6702 2.67 2.6702 2.6702 2.6700 1 OK
7F 2.0732 2.0732 2.2701 2.2701 2.2701 2.1717 1.04 OK 7F 2.4395 2.4408 2.4395 2.4408 2.4408 2.4395 1 OK
6F 1.872 1.872 2.0622 2.0622 2.0622 1.9671 1.04 OK 6F 2.1933 2.1958 2.1933 2.1958 2.1958 2.1933 1 OK
5F 1.6437 1.6437 1.8215 1.8215 1.8215 1.7326 1.05 OK 5F 1.9221 1.9262 1.9221 1.9262 1.9262 1.9221 1 OK
4F 1.3934 1.3934 1.5534 1.5534 1.5534 1.4734 1.05 OK 4F 1.6327 1.6387 1.6327 1.6387 1.6387 1.6327 1 OK
3F 1.1475 1.1475 1.2879 1.2879 1.2879 1.2177 1.05 OK 3F 1.3496 1.3575 1.3496 1.3575 1.3575 1.3496 1. OK
2F 0.8922 0.8922 1.0071 1.0071 1.0071 0.9497 1.06 OK 2F 1.0616 1.0663 1.0616 1.0663 1.0663 1.0616 1 OK
1F 0.6272 0.6272 0.7066 0.7066 0.7066 0.6669 1.05 OK 1F 0.7617 0.7701 0.7617 0.7701 0.7701 0.7617 1 OK
GF 0.2466 0.2462 0.2517 0.2517 0.2517 0.2492 1.01 OK GF 0.2677 0.271 0.2677 0.271 0.2710 0.2677 1 OK

With shear wall in X direction With shear wall in Y direction

Point Point Point Point Maximum Avg: Max Max
Point Point Point Point Maximum
Storey Remark Storey Avg: disp; Remark
20 31 21 32 disp; disp; Avg 20 31 21 32 disp; Avg
RF 1.8525 1.8525 1.8197 1.8197 1.853 1.836 1.01 OK RF 1.8193 1.8184 1.8193 1.8184 1.819 1.819 1.00 OK
9F 1.7156 1.7156 1.6895 1.6895 1.716 1.703 1.01 OK 9F 1.6668 1.6656 1.6668 1.6656 1.667 1.667 1.00 OK
8F 1.5619 1.5619 1.5431 1.5431 1.562 1.553 1.01 OK 8F 1.5026 1.5023 1.5026 1.5023 1.503 1.503 1.00 OK
7F 1.3909 1.3909 1.3802 1.3802 1.391 1.386 1.00 OK 7F 1.3268 1.3265 1.3268 1.3265 1.327 1.327 1.00 OK
6F 1.209 1.209 1.2067 1.2067 1.209 1.208 1.00 OK 6F 1.1436 1.1439 1.1436 1.1439 1.144 1.144 1.00 OK
5F 1.0152 1.0152 1.0215 1.0215 1.022 1.018 1.00 OK 5F 0.9542 0.9552 0.9542 0.9552 0.955 0.954 1.00 OK
4F 0.8141 0.8141 0.8288 0.8288 0.829 0.821 1.01 OK 4F 0.7629 0.7648 0.7629 0.7648 0.765 0.763 1.00 OK
3F 0.6161 0.6161 0.6391 0.6391 0.639 0.628 1.02 OK 3F 0.5775 0.5802 0.5775 0.5802 0.580 0.578 1.00 OK
2F 0.4238 0.4238 0.4539 0.4539 0.454 0.439 1.03 OK 2F 0.4014 0.4047 0.4014 0.4047 0.405 0.401 1.01 OK
1F 0.2494 0.2494 0.2817 0.2817 0.282 0.266 1.06 OK 1F 0.2431 0.2446 0.2431 0.2446 0.245 0.243 1.01 OK
GF 0.0789 0.0789 0.0933 0.0933 0.093 0.086 1.08 OK GF 0.0762 0.0775 0.0762 0.0775 0.078 0.076 1.02 OK 29
Torsional irregularity checking for Yangon
Without shear wall in X direction Without shear wall in Y direction
Point Point Point Point Maximum Avg: Max Point Point Point Maximum Max
Storey Remark Storey Point 20 Avg: disp; Remark
20 31 21 32 disp; disp; Avg 31 21 32 disp; Avg
RF 1.1503 1.1503 1.232 1.232 1.232 1.191 1.03 OK RF 1.3791 1.3786 1.3791 1.3786 1.379 1.379 1.00 OK
9F 1.1057 1.1057 1.194 1.194 1.194 1.150 1.04 OK 9F 1.3143 1.314 1.3143 1.314 1.314 1.314 1.00 OK
8F 1.0393 1.0393 1.1309 1.1309 1.131 1.085 1.04 OK 8F 1.2278 1.2278 1.2278 1.2278 1.228 1.228 1.00 OK
7F 0.9533 0.9533 1.0439 1.0439 1.044 0.999 1.05 OK 7F 1.1218 1.1224 1.1218 1.1224 1.122 1.122 1.00 OK
6F 0.8608 0.8608 0.9483 0.9483 0.948 0.905 1.05 OK 6F 1.0085 1.0097 1.0085 1.0097 1.010 1.009 1.00 OK
5F 0.7558 0.7558 0.8376 0.8376 0.838 0.797 1.05 OK 5F 0.8839 0.8857 0.8839 0.8857 0.886 0.884 1.00 OK
4F 0.6407 0.6407 0.7143 0.7143 0.714 0.678 1.05 OK 4F 0.7508 0.7535 0.7508 0.7535 0.754 0.751 1.00 OK
3F 0.5277 0.5277 0.5922 0.5922 0.592 0.560 1.06 OK 3F 0.6206 0.6242 0.6206 0.6242 0.624 0.621 1.01 OK
2F 0.4103 0.4103 0.4631 0.4631 0.463 0.437 1.06 OK 2F 0.4882 0.4925 0.4882 0.4925 0.493 0.488 1.01 OK
1F 0.2884 0.2884 0.3249 0.3249 0.325 0.307 1.06 OK 1F 0.3502 0.3541 0.3502 0.3541 0.354 0.350 1.01 OK
GF 0.1134 0.1134 0.1157 0.1157 0.116 0.115 1.01 OK GF 0.1231 0.1246 0.1231 0.125 0.125 0.123 1.02 OK

With shear wall in X direction With shear wall in Y direction

Point Point Point Point Maximum Avg: Max Point Point Point Maximum Avg: Max
Storey Remark Storey Point 32 Remark
20 31 21 32 disp; disp; Avg 20 31 21 disp; disp; Avg
RF 0.8519 0.8519 0.8368 0.8368 0.852 0.844 1.01 OK RF 0.8366 0.8361 0.8366 0.8361 0.837 0.837 1.00 OK
9F 0.7889 0.7889 0.7769 0.7769 0.789 0.783 1.01 OK 9F 0.7665 0.7659 0.7665 0.7659 0.767 0.767 1.00 OK
8F 0.7182 0.7182 0.7096 0.7096 0.718 0.714 1.01 OK 8F 0.691 0.6906 0.691 0.6906 0.691 0.691 1.00 OK
7F 0.6396 0.6396 0.6346 0.6346 0.640 0.637 1.00 OK 7F 0.6101 0.61 0.6101 0.61 0.610 0.610 1.00 OK
6F 0.5559 0.5559 0.5549 0.5549 0.556 0.555 1.00 OK 6F 0.5259 0.526 0.5259 0.526 0.526 0.526 1.00 OK
5F 0.4668 0.4668 0.4697 0.4697 0.470 0.468 1.00 OK 5F 0.4388 0.4392 0.4388 0.4392 0.439 0.439 1.00 OK
4F 0.3743 0.3743 0.3811 0.3811 0.381 0.378 1.01 OK 4F 0.3508 0.3517 0.3508 0.3517 0.352 0.351 1.00 OK
3F 0.2833 0.2833 0.2939 0.2939 0.294 0.289 1.02 OK 3F 0.2656 0.2668 0.2656 0.2668 0.267 0.266 1.00 OK
2F 0.1949 0.1949 0.2087 0.2087 0.209 0.202 1.03 OK 2F 0.1846 0.1861 0.1846 0.1861 0.186 0.185 1.01 OK
1F 0.1147 0.1147 0.1295 0.1295 0.130 0.122 1.06 OK 1F 0.1118 0.1132 0.1118 0.1132 0.113 0.112 1.01 OK
GF 0.0363 0.0363 0.0429 0.0429 0.043 0.040 1.08 OK GF 0.0351 0.0356 0.0351 0.0356 0.036 0.035 1.01 OK 30
Story drift checking for Mandalay
Without shear wall in X direction Without shear wall in Y direction
Allowable Limit Allowable
Story Drift X Story ht ( IN ) ∆s Remark Story Drift Y Story ht ( IN ) ∆s Remark
(0.02h)/p (0.02h)/p
RF 0.001135 120 0.136 1.846 OK RF 0.001551 120 0.18612 1.846 OK
9F 0.001511 120 0.181 1.846 OK 9F 0.001907 120 0.22884 1.846 OK
8F 0.001694 120 0.203 1.846 OK 8F 0.002049 120 0.24588 1.846 OK
7F 0.001934 120 0.232 1.846 OK 7F 0.002252 120 0.27024 1.846 OK
6F 0.002193 120 0.263 1.846 OK 6F 0.002411 120 0.28932 1.846 OK
5F 0.002252 120 0.270 1.846 OK 5F 0.002415 120 0.2898 1.846 OK
4F 0.002327 120 0.279 1.846 OK 4F 0.00242 120 0.2904 1.846 OK
3F 0.002549 120 0.305 1.846 OK 3F 0.002551 120 0.30612 1.846 OK
2F 0.002534 120 0.304 1.846 OK 2F 0.002997 120 0.35964 1.846 OK
1F 0.003125 120 0.375 1.846 OK 1F 0.003901 120 0.46812 1.846 OK
GF 0.001828 156 0.285 1.846 OK GF 0.002408 156 0.375648 2.4 OK

With shear wall in X direction With shear wall in Y direction

Story ht Allowable Story ht Allowable
Story Drift X ∆s Cd ∆max Remark Story Drift Y ∆s Cd ∆max Remark
( IN ) ( 0.02 x h ) ( IN ) ( 0.02 x h )
10F 0.0012 120.0 0.1498 5.5 0.8237 2.4 OK 10F 0.0014 120.0 0.1649 5.5 0.9068 2.4 OK
9F 0.0014 120.0 0.1668 5.5 0.9174 2.4 OK 9F 0.0015 120.0 0.1765 5.5 0.9709 2.4 OK
8F 0.0015 120.0 0.1788 5.5 0.9834 2.4 OK 8F 0.0015 120.0 0.1843 5.5 1.0138 2.4 OK
7F 0.0016 120.0 0.1907 5.5 1.0487 2.4 OK 7F 0.0016 120.0 0.1906 5.5 1.0481 2.4 OK
6F 0.0017 120.0 0.1990 5.5 1.0943 2.4 OK 6F 0.0016 120.0 0.1927 5.5 1.0600 2.4 OK
5F 0.0017 120.0 0.2021 5.5 1.1114 2.4 OK 5F 0.0016 120.0 0.1913 5.5 1.0520 2.4 OK
4F 0.0017 120.0 0.1988 5.5 1.0936 2.4 OK 4F 0.0015 120.0 0.1854 5.5 1.0197 2.4 OK
3F 0.0016 120.0 0.1930 5.5 1.0613 2.4 OK 3F 0.0015 120.0 0.1762 5.5 0.9689 2.4 OK
2F 0.0015 120.0 0.1746 5.5 0.9603 2.4 OK 2F 0.0013 120.0 0.1585 5.5 0.8719 2.4 OK
1F 0.0012 120.0 0.1459 5.5 0.8026 2.4 OK 1F 0.0011 120.0 0.1378 5.5 0.7577 2.4 OK
GF 0.0007 156.0 0.1016 5.5 0.5586 3.1 OK GF 0.0006 156.0 0.0941 5.5 0.5174 3.1 OK 31
Story drift checking for Yangon
Without shear wall in X direction Without shear wall in Y direction
Story height Allowable Story height Allowable
Story DriftX ∆s Remark Story DriftY ∆s Remark
( IN ) (0.02h)/p ( IN ) (0.02h)/p
RF 0.0005 120 0.0600 1.85 OK RF 0.0007 120 0.0852 1.85 OK
9F 0.0007 120 0.0840 1.85 OK 9F 0.0009 120 0.1056 1.85 OK
8F 0.0007 120 0.0840 1.85 OK 8F 0.0009 120 0.1080 1.85 OK
7F 0.0009 120 0.1080 1.85 OK 7F 0.0010 120 0.1200 1.85 OK
6F 0.0010 120 0.1200 1.85 OK 6F 0.0011 120 0.1320 1.85 OK
5F 0.0010 120 0.1200 1.85 OK 5F 0.0011 120 0.1320 1.85 OK
4F 0.0011 120 0.1284 1.85 OK 4F 0.0011 120 0.1320 1.85 OK
3F 0.0012 120 0.1440 1.85 OK 3F 0.0012 120 0.1440 1.85 OK
2F 0.0012 120 0.1392 1.85 OK 2F 0.0013 120 0.1560 1.85 OK
1F 0.0014 120 0.1680 1.85 OK 1F 0.0017 120 0.2040 1.85 OK
GF 0.0008 156 0.1310 2.40 OK GF 0.0011 156 0.1716 2.40 OK

With shear wall in X direction With shear wall in Y direction

Story height Allowable Story height Allowable
Story DriftX ∆s Cd ∆max Remark Story DriftY ∆s Cd ∆max Remark
( IN ) ( 0.02 x h ) ( IN ) (0.02 x h )
10F 0.0006 120.0 0.0689 5.5 0.3788 2.4 OK 10F 0.0006 120.0 0.0758 5.5 0.4171 2.4 OK
9F 0.0006 120.0 0.0767 5.5 0.4217 2.4 OK 9F 0.0007 120.0 0.0811 5.5 0.4462 2.4 OK
8F 0.0007 120.0 0.0822 5.5 0.4521 2.4 OK 8F 0.0007 120.0 0.0847 5.5 0.4660 2.4 OK
7F 0.0007 120.0 0.0877 5.5 0.4825 2.4 OK 7F 0.0007 120.0 0.0876 5.5 0.4818 2.4 OK
6F 0.0008 120.0 0.0916 5.5 0.5036 2.4 OK 6F 0.0007 120.0 0.0886 5.5 0.4871 2.4 OK
5F 0.0008 120.0 0.0929 5.5 0.5108 2.4 OK 5F 0.0007 120.0 0.0880 5.5 0.4838 2.4 OK
4F 0.0008 120.0 0.0914 5.5 0.5029 2.4 OK 4F 0.0007 120.0 0.0852 5.5 0.4686 2.4 OK
3F 0.0007 120.0 0.0888 5.5 0.4884 2.4 OK 3F 0.0007 120.0 0.0810 5.5 0.4455 2.4 OK
2F 0.0007 120.0 0.0803 5.5 0.4415 2.4 OK 2F 0.0006 120.0 0.0728 5.5 0.4006 2.4 OK
1F 0.0006 120.0 0.0671 5.5 0.3689 2.4 OK 1F 0.0005 120.0 0.0634 5.5 0.3485 2.4 OK
GF 0.0003 156.0 0.0432 5.5 0.2377 3.1 OK
GF 0.0003 156.0 0.0466 5.5 0.2565 3.1 OK 32
 P delta checking for Mandalay
Without shear wall in X direction Without shear wall in Y direction
Story Vx (Kips) Story height ( IN ) P (Kips) ∆sx (IN) Ɵ Limit Remark Story Vy Story height ( IN ) P (Kips) ∆sx Ɵ Limit Remark
RF 104.3 120 435.569 0.1362 0.000861 0.1 OK RF 104.3 120 435.569 0.18612 0.001177 0.1 OK
9F 217.65 120 819.557 0.18132 0.001034 0.1 OK 9F 217.65 120 819.557 0.22884 0.001305 0.1 OK
8F 317.66 120 1203.545 0.20328 0.001166 0.1 OK 8F 317.66 120 1203.545 0.24588 0.001411 0.1 OK
7F 405.87 120 1606.636 0.23208 0.00139 0.1 OK 7F 405.87 120 1606.636 0.27024 0.001620 0.1 OK
6F 482.53 120 2009.727 0.26316 0.00166 0.1 OK 6F 482.53 120 2009.727 0.28932 0.001825 0.1 OK
5F 546.63 120 2412.818 0.27024 0.00180 0.1 OK 5F 546.63 120 2412.818 0.2898 0.001938 0.1 OK
4F 599.42 120 2837.346 0.27924 0.002 0.1 OK 4F 599.42 120 2837.346 0.2904 0.002082 0.1 OK
3F 641.22 120 3261.874 0.30588 0.00235 0.1 OK 3F 641.22 120 3261.874 0.30612 0.002359 0.1 OK
2F 671.75 120 3735.403 0.30408 0.00256 0.1 OK 2F 671.75 120 3735.403 0.35964 0.00303 0.1 OK
1F 692.6 120 4159.931 0.375 0.00341 0.1 OK 1F 692.6 120 4159.931 0.46812 0.00426 0.1 OK
GF 698.23 156 4431.126 0.28516 0.0021 0.1 OK GF 698.23 156 4431.126 0.37564 0.00277 0.1 OK

With shear wall in X direction With shear wall in Y direction

Story height Story height
Story Vx DriftX P (Kips) ∆sx Ɵ Limit Remark Story Vy DriftY P (Kips) ∆sx Ɵ Limit Remark
( IN ) ( IN )
RF 109.31 0.001248 120 490.299 0.14976 0.001017778 0.1 OK RF 109.31 0.001374 120 490.299 0.16488 0.001120534 0.1 OK
9F 225.22 0.00139 120 901.652 0.1668 0.001011775 0.1 OK 9F 225.22 0.001471 120 901.652 0.17652 0.001070735 0.1 OK
8F 327.49 0.00149 120 1313.005 0.1788 0.001086155 0.1 OK 8F 327.49 0.001536 120 1313.005 0.18432 0.001119688 0.1 OK
7F 417.69 0.001589 120 1743.689 0.19068 0.00120608 0.1 OK 7F 417.69 0.001588 120 1743.689 0.19056 0.001205321 0.1 OK
6F 496.05 0.001658 120 2174.373 0.19896 0.001321388 0.1 OK 6F 496.05 0.001606 120 2174.373 0.19272 0.001279945 0.1 OK
5F 561.58 0.001684 120 2605.057 0.20208 0.001420316 0.1 OK 5F 561.58 0.001594 120 2605.057 0.19128 0.001344408 0.1 OK
4F 615.55 0.001657 120 3057.406 0.19884 0.001496407 0.1 OK 4F 615.55 0.001545 120 3057.406 0.1854 0.001395261 0.1 OK
3F 658.26 0.001608 120 3509.755 0.19296 0.001558844 0.1 OK 3F 658.26 0.001468 120 3509.755 0.17616 0.001423124 0.1 OK
2F 689.46 0.001455 120 3962.104 0.1746 0.001520257 0.1 OK 2F 689.46 0.001321 120 3962.104 0.15852 0.001380247 0.1 OK
1F 710.89 0.001216 120 4475.953 0.14592 0.001392047 0.1 OK 1F 710.89 0.001148 120 4475.953 0.13776 0.001314203 0.1 OK
GF 716.89 0.000651 156 4786.718 0.101556 0.000790321 0.1 OK GF 716.89 0.000603 156 4786.718 0.094068 0.000732049 0.1 OK
33
 P delta checking for Yangon
Without shear wall in X direction Without shear wall in Y direction
Story ht Story ht
Story Vx DriftX P (Kips) ∆sx Ɵ Limit Remark Story Vy DriftY P (Kips) ∆sx Ɵ Limit Remark
( IN ) ( IN )
RF 47.96 0.000522 120 435.569 0.06264 0.00086 0.1 OK RF 47.96 0.000713 120 435.569 0.08556 0.00118 0.1 OK
9F 100.08 0.000695 120 819.557 0.0834 0.00103 0.1 OK 9F 100.08 0.000877 120 819.557 0.10524 0.00131 0.1 OK
8F 146.07 0.000779 120 1203.545 0.09348 0.00117 0.1 OK 8F 146.07 0.000942 120 1203.545 0.11304 0.00141 0.1 OK
7F 186.63 0.000889 120 1606.636 0.10668 0.00139 0.1 OK 7F 186.63 0.001035 120 1606.636 0.1242 0.00162 0.1 OK
6F 221.88 0.001009 120 2009.727 0.12108 0.00166 0.1 OK 6F 221.88 0.001109 120 2009.727 0.13308 0.00183 0.1 OK
5F 251.36 0.001035 120 2412.818 0.1242 0.00181 0.1 OK 5F 251.36 0.00111 120 2412.818 0.1332 0.00194 0.1 OK
4F 275.63 0.00107 120 2837.346 0.1284 0.00200 0.1 OK 4F 275.63 0.001113 120 2837.346 0.13356 0.00208 0.1 OK
3F 294.85 0.001172 120 3261.874 0.14064 0.00236 0.1 OK 3F 294.85 0.001173 120 3261.874 0.14076 0.00236 0.1 OK
2F 308.89 0.001165 120 3735.403 0.1398 0.00256 0.1 OK 2F 308.89 0.001378 120 3735.403 0.16536 0.00303 0.1 OK
1F 318.48 0.001437 120 4159.931 0.17244 0.00341 0.1 OK 1F 318.48 0.001794 120 4159.931 0.21528 0.00426 0.1 OK
GF 321.12 0.000841 156 4431.126 0.131196 0.00211 0.1 OK GF 321.12 0.001107 156 4431.126 0.172692 0.00278 0.1 OK

With shear wall in X direction With shear wall in Y direction

Story ht Story ht
Story Vx DriftX P (Kips) ∆sx Ɵ Limit Remark Story Vy DriftY P (Kips) ∆sx Ɵ Limit Remark
( IN ) ( IN )
RF 50.27 0.000574 120 490.299 0.06888 0.00102 0.1 OK RF 50.27 0.000632 120 490.299 0.07584 0.00112 0.1 OK
9F 103.56 0.000639 120 901.652 0.07668 0.00101 0.1 OK 9F 103.56 0.000676 120 901.652 0.08112 0.00107 0.1 OK
8F 150.59 0.000685 120 1313.005 0.0822 0.00109 0.1 OK 8F 150.59 0.000706 120 1313.005 0.08472 0.00112 0.1 OK
7F 192.07 0.000731 120 1743.689 0.08772 0.00121 0.1 OK 7F 192.07 0.00073 120 1743.689 0.0876 0.00120 0.1 OK
6F 228.1 0.000763 120 2174.373 0.09156 0.00132 0.1 OK 6F 228.1 0.000738 120 2174.373 0.08856 0.00128 0.1 OK
5F 258.23 0.000774 120 2605.057 0.09288 0.00142 0.1 OK 5F 258.23 0.000733 120 2605.057 0.08796 0.00134 0.1 OK
4F 283.05 0.000762 120 3057.406 0.09144 0.00150 0.1 OK 4F 283.05 0.00071 120 3057.406 0.0852 0.00139 0.1 OK
3F 302.69 0.00074 120 3509.755 0.0888 0.00156 0.1 OK 3F 302.69 0.000675 120 3509.755 0.081 0.00142 0.1 OK
2F 317.04 0.000669 120 3962.104 0.08028 0.00152 0.1 OK 2F 317.04 0.000607 120 3962.104 0.07284 0.00138 0.1 OK
1F 326.89 0.000559 120 4475.953 0.06708 0.00139 0.1 OK 1F 326.89 0.000528 120 4475.953 0.06336 0.00131 0.1 OK
GF 329.65 0.000299 156 4786.718 0.046644 0.00079 0.1 OK GF 329.65 0.000277 156 4786.718 0.043212 0.00073 0.1 OK 34
Overturning checking for Mandalay
Without shear wall in X direction Without shear wall in Y direction
Vx Top M P Mo Center of Mr Vy Top M P Mo Center of Mr
Story Mr/Mo Remark Story Mr/Mo Remark
( kips) ( kips - ft ) ( kips ) ( kips- ft ) mass ( ft) ( kips - ft ) ( kips) ( kips - ft ) ( kips ) ( kips- ft ) mass ( ft) ( kips - ft )
10F 104.3 92.99 435.569 1135.99 20 7840.242 6.9016 OK 10F 104.3 92.99 435.569 1135.99 30.5 11956.36 10.525 OK
9F 217.65 1125.19 819.557 3301.699 20 14752.02 4.468 OK 9F 217.65 1125.199 819.557 3301.699 30.5 22496.83 6.813 OK
8F 317.66 3292.01 1203.54 6468.618 20 21663.81 3.349 OK 8F 317.66 3292.018 1203.55 6468.618 30.5 33037.31 5.107 OK
7F 405.87 6460.13 1606.63 10518.833 20 28919.44 2.7493 OK 7F 405.87 6460.133 1606.66 10518.833 30.5 44102.15 4.192 OK
6F 482.53 10511.46 2009.72 15336.767 20 36175.08 2.3587 OK 6F 482.53 10511.467 2009.77 15336.767 30.5 55167 3.597 OK
5F 546.63 15330.41 2412.81 20796.711 20 43430.72 2.0883 OK 5F 546.63 15330.411 2412.88 20796.711 30.5 66231.8 3.184 OK
4F 599.42 20791.37 2837.34 26785.578 20 51072.22 1.9067 OK 4F 599.42 20791.378 2837.36 26785.578 30.5 77885.1 2.907 OK
3F 641.22 26781.28 3261.87 33193.486 20 58713.73 1.7688 OK 3F 641.22 26781.286 3261.84 33193.486 30.5 89538.4 2.697 OK
2F 671.75 33190.11 3735.40 39907.613 20 67237.25 1.6848 OK 2F 671.75 33190.113 3735.43 39907.613 30.5 102536.8 2.569 OK
1F 692.6 39905.13 4159.93 46831.13 20 74878.75 1.5989 OK 1F 692.6 39905.13 4159.91 46831.13 30.5 114190.1 2.438 OK
GF 698.23 43806.37 4431.12 52883.367 20 79760.26 1.5082 OK GF 698.23 43806.377 4431.16 52883.367 30.5 121634.4 2.3 OK

With shear wall in X direction With shear wall in Y direction

Story Vx Top M P Mo Center of Mr Story Vy Top M P Mo Center of Mr

Story Mr/Mo Remark Story Mr/Mo Remark
height ( kips) ( kips - ft ) ( kips ) ( kips- ft ) mass ( ft) ( kips - ft ) ht ( kips) ( kips - ft ) ( kips ) ( kips- ft ) mass ( ft) ( kips - ft )
10F 10 109.31 114.378 490.299 1207.478 20 8825.382 7.309 OK 10F 10 109.31 114.378 490.299 1207.478 30.5 13458.70755 11.146 OK
9F 10 225.22 1196.706 901.652 3448.906 20 16229.736 4.706 OK 9F 10 225.22 1196.706 901.652 3448.906 30.5 24750.3474 7.176 OK
8F 10 327.49 3439.221 1313.005 6714.121 20 23634.09 3.520 OK 8F 10 327.49 3439.221 1313.005 6714.121 30.5 36041.98725 5.368 OK
7F 10 417.69 6705.601 1743.689 10882.501 20 31386.402 2.884 OK
7F 10 417.69 6705.601 1743.689 10882.501 30.5 47864.26305 4.398 OK
6F 10 496.05 10875.147 2174.373 15835.647 20 39138.714 2.472 OK
6F 10 496.05 10875.147 2174.373 15835.647 30.5 59686.53885 3.769 OK
5F 10 561.58 15829.358 2605.057 21445.158 20 46891.026 2.187 OK
5F 10 561.58 15829.358 2605.057 21445.158 30.5 71508.81465 3.334 OK
4F 10 615.55 21439.855 3057.406 27595.355 20 55033.308 1.994 OK
4F 10 615.55 21439.855 3057.406 27595.355 30.5 83925.7947 3.041 OK
3F 10 658.26 27591.045 3509.755 34173.645 20 63175.59 1.849 OK
3F 10 658.26 27591.045 3509.755 34173.645 30.5 96342.77475 2.819 OK
2F 10 689.46 34170.298 3962.104 41064.898 20 71317.872 1.737 OK
2F 10 689.46 34170.298 3962.104 41064.898 30.5 108759.7548 2.648 OK
1F 10 710.89 41062.419 4475.953 48171.319 20 80567.154 1.673 OK
1F 10 710.89 41062.419 4475.953 48171.319 30.5 122864.9099 2.551 OK
GF 13 716.89 47301.437 4786.718 56621.007 20 86160.924 1.522 OK
GF 13 716.89 47301.437 4786.718 56621.007 30.5 131395.4091 2.321 OK

35
Overturning checking for Yangon
Without shear wall in X direction Without shear wall in Y direction

Story Vx Top M P Mo Center of Mr Story Vy Top M P Mo Center of Mr

Story Mr/Mo Remark Story Mr/Mo Remark
height ( kips) ( kips - ft ) ( kips ) ( kips- ft ) mass ( ft) ( kips - ft ) height ( kips) ( kips - ft ) ( kips ) ( kips- ft ) mass ( ft) ( kips - ft )
10F 10 47.96 42.760 435.569 522.360 20 7840.242 15.009 OK 10F 10 47.96 42.760 435.569 522.360 30.5 11956.36905 22.889 OK
9F 10 100.08 517.404 819.557 1518.204 20 14752.026 9.717 OK 9F 10 100.08 517.404 819.557 1518.204 30.5 22496.83965 14.818 OK
8F 10 146.07 1513.780 1203.545 2974.480 20 21663.81 7.283 OK 8F 10 146.07 1513.780 1203.545 2974.480 30.5 33037.31025 11.107 OK
7F 10 186.63 2970.585 1606.636 4836.885 20 28919.448 5.979 OK 7F 10 186.63 2970.585 1606.636 4836.885 30.5 44102.1582 9.118 OK
6F 10 221.88 4833.523 2009.727 7052.323 30.5 55167.00615 7.823 OK
6F 10 221.88 4833.523 2009.727 7052.323 20 36175.086 5.130 OK
5F 10 251.36 7049.434 2412.818 9563.034 30.5 66231.8541 6.926 OK
5F 10 251.36 7049.434 2412.818 9563.034 20 43430.724 4.542 OK
4F 10 275.63 9560.569 2837.346 12316.869 30.5 77885.1477 6.323 OK
4F 10 275.63 9560.569 2837.346 12316.869 20 51072.228 4.147 OK
3F 10 294.85 12314.928 3261.874 15263.428 30.5 89538.4413 5.866 OK
3F 10 294.85 12314.928 3261.874 15263.428 20 58713.732 3.847 OK 2F 10 308.89 15261.920 3735.403 18350.820 30.5 102536.8124 5.588 OK
2F 10 308.89 15261.920 3735.403 18350.820 20 67237.254 3.664 OK 1F 10 318.48 18349.709 4159.931 21534.509 30.5 114190.106 5.303 OK
1F 10 318.48 18349.709 4159.931 21534.509 20 74878.758 3.477 OK GF 13 321.12 22488.782 4431.126 26663.342 30.5 121634.4087 4.562 OK
GF 13 321.12 22488.782 4431.126 26663.342 20 79760.268 2.991 OK

With shear wall in X direction With shear wall in Y direction

Center Story Vy Top M P Mo Center of Mr
Story Vx Top M P Mo Mr Story Mr/Mo Remark
Story of mass Mr/Mo Remark height ( kips) ( kips - ft ) ( kips ) ( kips- ft ) mass ( ft) ( kips - ft )
height ( kips) ( kips - ft ) ( kips ) ( kips- ft ) ( kips - ft )
( ft) 10F 10 50.27 52.594833 490.299 555.295 30.5 13458.70755 24.237048 OK
10F 10 50.27 52.59483333 490.299 555.295 20 8825.382 15.8931463 OK 9F 10 103.56 550.28533 901.652 1585.885 30.5 24750.3474 15.6066462 OK
9F 10 103.56 550.2850833 901.652 1585.885 20 16229.736 10.2338664 OK
8F 10 150.59 1581.4617 1313.005 3087.368 30.5 36041.98725 11.6740157 OK
8F 10 150.59 1581.468417 1313.005 3087.368 20 23634.09 7.65509224 OK
7F 10 192.07 3083.4567 1743.689 5004.159 30.5 47864.26305 9.56489717 OK
7F 10 192.07 3083.458667 1743.689 5004.159 20 31386.402 6.27206372 OK
6F 10 228.1 5000.7517 2174.373 7281.755 30.5 59686.53885 8.19672449 OK
6F 10 228.1 5000.754917 2174.373 7281.755 20 39138.714 5.3749013 OK
5F 10 258.23 7278.86 2605.057 9861.167 30.5 71508.81465 7.25155737 OK
5F 10 258.23 7278.8665 2605.057 9861.167 20 46891.026 4.75511959 OK
4F 10 283.05 9858.759917 3057.406 12689.260 20 55033.308 4.33699903 OK 4F 10 283.05 9858.7517 3057.406 12689.260 30.5 83925.7947 6.61392353 OK
3F 10 302.69 12687.282 3509.755 15714.182 20 63175.59 4.02029135 OK 3F 10 302.69 12687.22 3509.755 15714.182 30.5 96342.77475 6.13094431 OK
2F 10 317.04 15712.64183 3962.104 18883.042 20 71317.872 3.77682116 OK 2F 10 317.04 15712.641 3962.104 18883.042 30.5 108759.7548 5.75965227 OK
1F 10 326.89 18881.86917 4475.953 22150.769 20 80567.154 3.63721699 OK 1F 10 326.89 18881.86 4475.953 22150.769 30.5 122864.9099 5.54675591 OK
GF 13 329.65 23130.27733 4786.718 27415.727 20 86160.924 3.14275536 OK GF 13 329.65 23130.27 4786.718 27415.727 30.5 131395.4091 4.79270192 OK 36
Sliding checking
MDY without shear wall in both X and Y direction YGN without shear wall in both X and Y direction
Total weight = 4431.126 kips Total weight = 4431.126 kips
Friction coefficient = 0.3 Friction coefficient = 0.3
Base shear due to EQX = 698.23 kips Base shear due to EQX = 321.12 kips
Resisting force = 0.9 x total weight x friction coeff; Resisting force = 0.9 x total weight x friction coeff;
= 1196.404 kips = 1196.404 kips
Safety factor = Resisting force / Base shear Safety factor = Resisting force / Base shear
= 1.713 > 1.5 OK = 3.725 > 1.5 OK

MDY with shear wall in both X and Y direction YGN with shear wall in both X and Y direction
Total weight = 4786.718 kips Total weight = 4786.718 kips
Friction coefficient = 0.3 Friction coefficient = 0.3
Base shear due to EQX = 716.89 kips Base shear due to EQX = 329.65 kips
Resisting force = 0.9 x total weight x friction coeff; Resisting force = 0.9 x total weight x friction coeff;
= 1292.41 kips = 1292.41 kips
Safety factor = Resisting force / Base shear Safety factor = Resisting force / Base shear
= 1.802 > 1.5 OK = 3.9205 > 1.5 OK
37
Base shear checking

MDY without shear wall in both X and Y direction YGN without shear wall in both X and Y direction

Weight used, W = 6984.23 kips Weight used, W = 6984.23 kips

Base Shear , V = 698.23 kips Base Shear , V = 321.12 kips
SDS = 1.34 SDS = 0.6119
SD1 = 0.8 SD1 = 0.3679
T =1 T =1
R =8 R =8
I =1 I =1

Seismic coefficient, Cs = 𝑥 𝐼 = 0.1 Seismic coefficient, Cs = 𝑥 𝐼 = 0.1

Vx , Vy = Cs W Vx , Vy = Cs W
= 698.423 kips > 698.23 kips = 698.423 kips > 321.12 kips
38
Base shear checking (continued)

MDY with shear wall in both X and Y direction YGN with shear wall in both X and Y direction

Weight used, W = 7169.98 kips Weight used, W = 7169.98 kips

Base Shear , V = 716.89 kips Base Shear , V = 329.65 kips
SDS = 1.34 SDS = 0.6119
SD1 = 0.8 SD1 = 0.3679
T used =1 T used =1
R =8 R =8
I =1 I =1

Seismic coefficient, Cs = 𝑥 𝐼 = 0.1 Seismic coefficient, Cs = 𝑥 𝐼 = 0.1

Vx , Vy = Cs W Vx , Vy = Cs W
= 716.998 kips > 716.89 kips = 716.998 kips > 329.65 kips
39
Comparison of ∆max/∆avg values of Torsional Irregularity checking

X direction
1.1000
1.0800
1.0600
∆max/∆avg

1.0400
1.0200
1.0000
0.9800 Limit : ∆max/∆avg < 1.2
0.9600
0.9400
RF 9F 8F 7F 6F 5F 4F 3F 2F 1F GF
MDY without shear wall 1.0343 1.0384 1.0422 1.0453 1.0483 1.0513 1.0543 1.0576 1.0605 1.0595 1.0102
YGN without shear wall 1.0343 1.0384 1.0422 1.0454 1.0484 1.0513 1.0543 1.0576 1.0605 1.0595 1.0100  The values of ∆max/∆avg are almost equal for all four structures.
MDY with shear wall 1.0089 1.0077 1.0061 1.0039 1.0010 1.0031 1.0089 1.0183 1.0343 1.0608 1.0836
YGN with shear wall 1.0089 1.0077 1.0060 1.0039 1.0009 1.0031 1.0090 1.0184 1.0342 1.0606 1.0833

Story

Y direction
1.0200
1.0150
∆max/∆avg

1.0100
1.0050
1.0000
0.9950
0.9900
RF 9F 8F 7F 6F 5F 4F 3F 2F 1F GF
MDY without shear wall 1.0000 1.0000 1.0001 1.0005 1.0011 1.0021 1.0037 1.0059 1.0044 1.0110 1.0123
YGN without shear wall 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0005 1.0012 1.0020 1.0036 1.0058 1.0088 1.0111 1.0154
MDY with shear wall 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0003 1.0010 1.0025 1.0047 1.0082 1.0062 1.0171
YGN with shear wall 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0002 1.0009 1.0026 1.0045 1.0081 1.0125 1.0142
40
Story
Comparison of ∆s values of Story Drift checking

X direction
0.4000 Limit : ∆s < ∆a / p
0.3500
0.3000
0.2500
0.2000
∆s

0.1500
0.1000
0.0500
0.0000
• ∆s of Mandalay without shear wall is average 2.162 times
RF 9F 8F 7F 6F 5F 4F 3F 2F 1F GF
MDY without shear wall 0.1320 0.1800 0.1920 0.2280 0.2520 0.2640 0.2760 0.3000 0.3000 0.3720 0.2808 grater than that of Yangon without shear wall in X direction.
YGN without shear wall 0.0600 0.0840 0.0840 0.1080 0.1200 0.1200 0.1284 0.1440 0.1392 0.1680 0.1310
• ∆s of Mandalay with shear wall is average 2.206 times grater
Storey
than that of Yangon with shear wall l in Y direction.
• Maximum difference value is at 1F .
• Maximum values of ∆s are at 1F.
Y direction
• ∆s is less than the limit of 1.85 for 1F – RF and 2.4 for GF
0.5000
0.4000 meaning that the proposed building is stable.
0.3000
∆s

0.2000
0.1000
0.0000
RF 9F 8F 7F 6F 5F 4F 3F 2F 1F GF
MDY without shear wall 0.1800 0.2280 0.2400 0.2760 0.2880 0.2880 0.2880 0.3000 0.3600 0.4800 0.3756
YGN without shear wall 0.0852 0.1056 0.1080 0.1200 0.1320 0.1320 0.1320 0.1440 0.1560 0.2040 0.1716

Storey

41
Comparison of ∆max values of Story Drift checking

X direction

1.2000 Limit : ∆max < ∆a / p

1.0000
0.8000
∆max

0.6000 • ∆s of Mandalay without shear wall is average 2.1747 times

0.4000
0.2000
grater than that of Yangon without shear wall in X direction.
0.0000 • ∆s of Mandalay with shear wall is average 2.1754 times grater
10F 9F 8F 7F 6F 5F 4F 3F 2F 1F GF
MDY with shear wall 0.8237 0.9174 0.9834 1.0487 1.0943 1.1114 1.0936 1.0613 0.9603 0.8026 0.5586
than that of Yangon with shear wall in Y direction.
YGN with shear wall 0.3788 0.4217 0.4521 0.4825 0.5036 0.5108 0.5029 0.4884 0.4415 0.3689 0.2565
Storey • Maximum difference value is at 5F for X direction and 6F for Y
direction.
X direction
• Maximum values of ∆s are at 5F for X direction and 6F for Y
1.2000
direction.
1.0000
0.8000
• ∆max is less than the limit of 2.4 for 1F – RF and 3.1 for GF
∆max

0.6000 meaning that the proposed building is stable.

0.4000
0.2000
0.0000
10F 9F 8F 7F 6F 5F 4F 3F 2F 1F GF
MDY with shear wall 0.9068 0.9709 1.0138 1.0481 1.0600 1.0520 1.0197 0.9689 0.8719 0.7577 0.5174
YGN with shear wall 0.4171 0.4462 0.4660 0.4818 0.4871 0.4838 0.4686 0.4455 0.4006 0.3485 0.2377
Storey 42
Comparison of stability coefficient Ɵ of P-Delta checking

X direction
0.003500
0.003000
0.002500
0.002000 Limit : Ɵ < 0.1
0.001500
Ɵ

0.001000
0.000500
0.000000
RF 9F 8F 7F 6F 5F 4F 3F 2F 1F GF • The values of Ɵ for all four structures are almost equal.
MDY without shear wall 0.000862 0.001034 0.001167 0.001392 0.001661 0.001807 0.002003 0.002358 0.002562 0.003413 0.002109 • Ɵ is less than the limit of 0.1 meaning that the proposed
YGN without shear wall 0.000862 0.001035 0.001167 0.001391 0.001662 0.001806 0.002003 0.002357 0.002562 0.003413 0.002110 building is stable.
MDY with shear wall 0.001018 0.001012 0.001086 0.001206 0.001321 0.001420 0.001496 0.001559 0.001520 0.001392 0.000790
YGN with shear wall 0.001018 0.001012 0.001086 0.001207 0.001322 0.001420 0.001497 0.001560 0.001520 0.001392 0.000789

Storey

Y direction

0.005000
0.004000
0.003000
0.002000
Ɵ

0.001000
0.000000
RF 9F 8F 7F 6F 5F 4F 3F 2F 1F GF
MDY without shear wall 0.00117 0.00130 0.00141 0.00162 0.00182 0.00193 0.00208 0.00235 0.00303 0.00426 0.00277
YGN without shear wall 0.00117 0.00130 0.00141 0.00162 0.00182 0.00193 0.00208 0.00235 0.00303 0.00426 0.00277
MDY with shear wall 0.00112 0.00107 0.00112 0.00120 0.00128 0.00134 0.00139 0.00142 0.00138 0.00131 0.00073
YGN with shear wall 0.00112 0.00107 0.00111 0.00120 0.00127 0.00134 0.00139 0.00142 0.00137 0.00131 0.00073

Storey 43
Comparison of Over Turning Safety Factor
X direction
18.000
16.000
14.000
Mr/Mo

12.000
10.000
8.000 Limit : Mr/Mo >1.5
6.000
4.000
2.000
0.000
RF 9F 8F 7F 6F 5F 4F 3F 2F 1F GF • The values of Mr/Mo of Yangon without shear wall is 2.1573
MDY without shear wall 6.902 4.468 3.349 2.749 2.359 2.088 1.907 1.769 1.685 1.599 1.508 times greater than that of Mandalay without shear wall in
YGN without shear wall 15.009 9.717 7.283 5.979 5.130 4.542 4.147 3.847 3.664 3.477 2.991
both X and Y direction.
MDY with shear wall 7.309 4.706 3.520 2.884 2.472 2.187 1.994 1.849 1.737 1.673 1.522
YGN with shear wall 15.893 10.234 7.655 6.272 5.375 4.755 4.337 4.020 3.777 3.637 3.143
• The values of Mr/Mo of Yangon with shear wall is 2.1647
times greater than that of Mandalay with shear wall in both X
Storey and Y direction.
• The values of Mr/Mo of Mandalay with shear wall is 1.044
times greater than that of Mandalay without shear wall in
Y direction both X and Y direction.
30.000
• The values of Mr/Mo of Yangon with shear wall is 1.0477
25.000 times greater than that of Yangon without shear wall in both
X and Y direction.
Mr/Mo

20.000
15.000
10.000
• The maximum safety factor values are at RF meaning that GF
5.000 is more possible to fail with over turning.
0.000
RF 9F 8F 7F 6F 5F 4F 3F 2F 1F GF • Mr/Mo is greater than the limit of 1.5 meaning that the
MDY without shear wall 10.525 6.814 5.107 4.193 3.597 3.185 2.908 2.697 2.569 2.438 2.300 proposed building is stable.
YGN without shear wall 22.889 14.818 11.107 9.118 7.823 6.926 6.323 5.866 5.588 5.303 4.562
MDY with shear wall 11.146 7.176 5.368 4.398 3.769 3.334 3.041 2.819 2.648 2.551 2.321
YGN with shear wall 24.237 15.607 11.674 9.565 8.197 7.252 6.614 6.131 5.760 5.547 4.793

Storey 44
Comparison of Sliding Safety Factor

• The value of safety factor of Yangon without shear wall is 2.1744 times

Both X and Y direction greater than that of Mandalay without shear wall.

3.92056381
• The value of safety factor of Yangon with shear wall is 2.1746 times
3.725722534
4
greater than that of Mandalay with shear wall.
3.5
3 • The value of safety factor of Mandalay without shear wall is 1.05213 times
safety factor

2.5
2
1.71348126 1.802806372 greater than that of Mandalay with shear wall.
1.5
• The value of safety factor of Yangon without shear wall is 1.05229 times
1
0.5 greater than that of Yangon with shear wall.
0
MDY no YGN no MDY with YGN with • The buildings with shear wall have the maximum values of safety factor as
shearwall shearwall shearwall shearwall
the shear wall can provide large stiffness than sole moment resisting
frame.
• Sliding is more possible in Mandalay than Yangon as the seismic effects are
more severe in Mandalay.

45
List of analysis results comparison

To investigate the structural performance of the proposed building, the following analysis results
are compared:

1. Comparison of maximum displacement

2. Comparison of story drift
3. Comparison of overturning moment
4. Comparison of story shear
5. Comparison of axial forces and rebar percentage in columns
6. Comparison of shear forces, bending moments and rebar percentage in beams

46
Comparison of Maximum displacement

Maximum Displacement due to EQX Maximum displacement due to EQY

Maximum Displacement (in)

Maximim displacement (in)

3.0000 3.0000
2.5000 2.5000
2.0000 2.0000
1.5000 1.5000
1.0000 1.0000

0.5000 0.5000

0.0000 0.0000
RF 9F 8F 7F 6F 5F 4F 3F 2F 1F GF RF 9F 8F 7F 6F 5F 4F 3F 2F 1F GF
MDY without shearwall 2.6792 2.5965 2.4594 2.2701 2.0622 1.8215 1.5534 1.2879 1.0071 0.7066 0.2517 MDY without shear wall 2.9991 2.8581 2.6702 2.4408 2.1958 1.9262 1.6387 1.3575 1.0663 0.7701 0.2710
YGN without shearwall 1.2320 1.1940 1.1309 1.0439 0.9483 0.8376 0.7143 0.5922 0.4631 0.3249 0.1157 YGN without shear wall 1.3791 1.3143 1.2278 1.1224 1.0097 0.8857 0.7535 0.6242 0.4925 0.3541 0.1250
MDY with shear wall 1.8525 1.7156 1.5619 1.3909 1.2090 1.0215 0.8288 0.6391 0.4539 0.2817 0.0933 MDY with shear wall 1.8193 1.6668 1.5026 1.3268 1.1439 0.9552 0.7648 0.5802 0.4047 0.2446 0.0775
YGN with shear wall 0.8519 0.7889 0.7182 0.6396 0.5559 0.4697 0.3811 0.2939 0.2087 0.1295 0.0429 YGN with shear wall 0.8366 0.7665 0.6910 0.6101 0.5260 0.4392 0.3517 0.2668 0.1861 0.1132 0.0356
Storey Storey

• The displacement values of models in Yangon are average 54.013% smaller than that of models in Mandalay due to the different seismic data as
seismic effect of Mandalay are more severe than Yangon.
• The displacement values of models without shear wall are average 54.728% larger than that of models with shear wall as the shear wall provide
large strength and stiffness and can reduce lateral sway.
• Maximum displacements for all four models are at RF floor level.

47
Comparison of Story drift

Drift due to EQX Drift due to EQY

0.0035 0.0040
0.0030 0.0035
Drift (in)

Drift (in)
0.0025 0.0030
0.0025
0.0020
0.0020
0.0015
0.0015
0.0010 0.0010
0.0005 0.0005
0.0000 0.0000
RF 9F 8F 7F 6F 5F 4F 3F 2F 1F GF RF 9F 8F 7F 6F 5F 4F 3F 2F 1F GF
MDY without shear wall 0.0011 0.0015 0.0016 0.0019 0.0021 0.0022 0.0023 0.0025 0.0025 0.0031 0.0018 MDY without shear wall 0.0015 0.0019 0.0020 0.0023 0.0024 0.0024 0.0024 0.0025 0.0030 0.0040 0.0024
YGN without shear wall 0.0005 0.0007 0.0007 0.0009 0.0010 0.0010 0.0011 0.0012 0.0012 0.0014 0.0008 YGN without shear wall 0.0007 0.0009 0.0009 0.0010 0.0011 0.0011 0.0011 0.0012 0.0013 0.0017 0.0011
MDY with shear wall 0.0012 0.0014 0.0015 0.0016 0.0017 0.0017 0.0017 0.0016 0.0015 0.0012 0.0007 MDY with shear wall 0.0014 0.0015 0.0015 0.0016 0.0016 0.0016 0.0015 0.0015 0.0013 0.0011 0.0006
YGN with shear wall 0.0006 0.0006 0.0007 0.0007 0.0008 0.0008 0.0008 0.0007 0.0007 0.0006 0.0003 YGN with shear wall 0.0006 0.0007 0.0007 0.0007 0.0007 0.0007 0.0007 0.0007 0.0006 0.0005 0.0003
Storey Storey

• The story drift of with shear wall model are average 6.667% smaller than without shear wall model and smaller from 1F to RF dramatically.
• The story drift value in Yangon are average 55.23% smaller than in Mandalay due to the different seismic data as seismic effect of Mandalay are
more severe than Yangon.
• Maximum drift for without shear wall models are at 1F floor level.
• Maximum drift for with shear wall models are at 6F, 5F and 4F floor levels.

48
Comparison of Story Shear for both EQX and EQY

800
700
600
story shear (kips)

500
400
300
200
100
0
RF 9F 8F 7F 6F 5F 4F 3F 2F 1F GF
MDY without shear wall 104.3 217.65 317.66 405.87 482.53 546.63 599.42 641.22 671.75 692.6 698.23
YGN without shear wall 47.96 100.08 146.07 186.63 221.88 251.36 275.63 294.85 308.89 318.48 321.12
MDY with shear wall 109.31 225.22 327.49 417.69 496.05 561.58 615.55 658.26 689.46 710.89 716.89
YGN with shear wall 50.27 103.56 150.59 192.07 228.1 258.23 283.05 302.69 317.04 326.89 329.65
Storey

• The story shear value of with shear wall model are average 2.672 % larger than without shear wall model due to the effect of shear wall and then
they are smaller from GF to RF dramatically.
• The story shear value in Yangon are average 54.01 % smaller than in Mandalay due to the different seismic data as seismic effect of Mandalay are
more severe than Yangon.
• Maximum values of story shear for all four models are at GF level.

49
Comparison of Overturning moment for both EQX and EQY
overturning moment (kips-ft)

60000.000
50000.000
40000.000
30000.000
20000.000
10000.000
0.000
RF 9F 8F 7F 6F 5F 4F 3F 2F 1F GF
MDY without shear wall 1135.990 3301.699 6468.618 10518.833 15336.767 20796.711 26785.578 33193.486 39907.613 46831.130 52883.367
YGN without shear wall 522.360 1518.204 2974.480 4836.885 7052.323 9563.034 12316.869 15263.428 18350.820 21534.509 26663.342
MDY with shear wall 1207.478 3448.906 6714.121 10882.501 15835.647 21445.158 27595.355 34173.645 41064.898 48171.319 56621.007
YGN with shear wall 555.295 1585.885 3087.368 5004.159 7281.755 9861.167 12689.260 15714.182 18883.042 22150.769 27415.727
Storey

• The overturning moment of with shear wall model are 7.0677 % greater than without shear wall model due to the effect of larger value of story
shear and then they are smaller from GF to RF dramatically.
• The overturning moment value in Yangon are 49.58 % smaller than in Mandalay due to the different seismic data as seismic effect of Mandalay
are more severe than Yangon.
• Maximum values of over turning moment for all four models are at GF level.

50
Comparison between columns

Selected columns for comparison

• To compare axial forces and rebar percentage

in columns, combination 12 (1.2DL+1.0LL-
1EQX) is selected as it is the critical value
among other combinations.
C21
• C21 is selected as it has the maximum axial
force among corner columns.
• C25 is selected as it has the maximum axial
force among exterior columns.
• C24 is selected as it has the maximum axial
force among interior and to show the
C2 C24
difference of axial force value between with
and without shear wall.
• C2 is selected as it has the largest tributary
among other columns.
C25

51
Comparison of axial force in selected columns

Comparison of axial force

700
600
axial force (kip)

500
400
300
mdy no shear wall
200
100 ygn no shear wall
0 mdy with shear wall
C21 C25 C24 C2
mdy no shear wall 427.78 622.92 646.03 512.56 ygn with shear wall
ygn no shear wall 373.67 491.09 504.72 441.15
mdy with shear wall 395.13 477.44 653.34 477.4
ygn with shear wall 352.8 392.66 398.94 400.88
column

 The axial force values of Mandalay are average 21.375 % larger than that of Yangon due to the different
seismic zones.
 In C24 which is the supporting column of shear wall, the axial force values are larger in with shear wall
model due to the effect of shear wall. (Both Yangon and Mandalay)

52
Comparison of Rebar percentage in selected columns

Comparison of rebar percentage for C21 Comparison of rebar percentage for C25 Comparison of rebar percentage for C2

Rebar percentage
Rebar percentage

Rebar percentage
1 1 1
0.8 0.8 0.8
0.6 0.6 0.6
0.4 0.4 0.4
0.2 0.2 0.2
0 0 0
RF 9F 8F 7F 6F 5F 4F 3F 2F 1F GF RF 9F 8F 7F 6F 5F 4F 3F 2F 1F GF RF 9F 8F 7F 6F 5F 4F 3F 2F 1F GF
mdy no shear wall 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 mdy no shear wall 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 mdy no shear wall 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
ygn no shear wall 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ygn no shear wall 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ygn no shear wall 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
mdy with shear wall 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 mdy with shear wall 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 mdy with shear wall 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
ygn with shear wall 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ygn with shear wall 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ygn with shear wall 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

storey storey storey

Comparison of rebar percentage for C24

Rebar percentage

1
0.8
0.6 • The value of rebar percentage for all selected columns are within allowable
0.4
0.2 limit of 1-6% for special moment resisting.
0
RF 9F 8F 7F 6F 5F 4F 3F 2F 1F GF
mdy no shear wall 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • Meaning the structural members are capable of resisting loads with the
ygn no shear wall 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 applied section sizes with minimum rebar percentage.
mdy with shear wall 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
ygn with shear wall 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

storey

53
Comparison between beams

Selected beams for comparison

• To compare bending moment, shear force and rebar

percentage in beams, combination 12 (1.2DL+1.0LL-
1EQX) is selected as it is the critical value among other
combinations.
• B1,B21 and B32 are selected as they have the same
section of (12 x 14) with different span lengths.
B32

 B1 (exterior beam,14ft)
B1
 B32 (interior beam, 8ft)
 B21 (exterior beam, 10ft)
B21

54
Comparison of Shear Force between selected beams
Comparison of Shear Force values for B1
7 7
6 6.8
5 6.6
shear force (kip)

6.4
4
6.2
3 6

shear force (kip)

2 5.8
1 5.6
0 5.4
GF 1F 2F 3F 4F 5F 6F 7F 8F 9F RF 5.2
mdy no shear wall 5.98 6.62 6.52 6.42 6.41 6.43 6.36 6.34 6.3 6.14 5.28 5
ygn no shear wall 5.49 6.2 6.17 6.13 6.15 6.19 6.16 6.18 6.2 6.11 5.27 GF 1F 2F 3F 4F 5F 6F 7F 8F 9F RF
mdy with shear wall 5.77 6.24 6.02 6.11 6.23 6.38 6.49 6.61 6.75 6.83 5.87
ygn with shear wall 5.53 6.2 6.14 6.23 6.33 6.46 6.55 6.65 6.76 6.81 5.84
storey
storey mdy no shear wall ygn no shear wall
mdy with shear wall ygn with shear wall

 Shear force values of Mandalay without shear wall are average 1.039 times greater than that of Yangon without shear wall.
 Shear force values of Yangon without shear wall are average 0.9977 times greater than that of Yangon with shear wall.
 Shear force values of Mandalay with shear wall are average 0.9944 times greater than that of Mandalay without shear wall.
 Shear force values of Yangon with shear wall are average 0.9544 times greater than that of Yangon without shear wall.

55
Comparison of Shear Force values for B21

25
25
20
20

15 15
shear force (kip)

shear force (kip)

10
10
5
5
0
GF 1F 2F 3F 4F 5F 6F 7F 8F 9F RF
mdy no shear wall 15.99 23.78 23.24 22.65 21.87 20.59 18.88 16.98 14.62 12.12 7.78 0
ygn no shear wall 7.88 13.98 13.61 13.3 12.94 12.37 11.54 10.71 9.71 8.54 5.58 GF 1F 2F 3F 4F 5F 6F 7F 8F 9F RF
mdy with shear wall 6.51 15.52 17.32 17.82 17.46 16.57 15.77 14.45 12.92 12.03 8.14 storey
ygn with shear wall 3.38 9.87 10.46 10.54 10.29 9.84 9.33 8.73 8.1 7.6 4.98
mdy no shear wall ygn no shear wall
storey mdy with shear wall ygn with shear wall

 Shear force values of Mandalay without shear wall are average 1.637 times greater than that of Yangon without shear wall.
 Shear force values of Mandalay with shear wall are average 1.671 times greater than that of Yangon with shear wall.
 Shear force values of Mandalay with shear wall are average 1.324 times less than that of Mandalay without shear wall.
 Shear force values of Yangon with shear wall are average 1.339 times less than that of Yangon without shear wall.

56
Comparison of Shear Force values for B32

4
3.5
3.5
3
Shear force (kips)

3
2.5
2.5

Axis Title
2
2
1.5
1 1.5
0.5 1
0 0.5
GF 1F 2F 3F 4F 5F 6F 7F 8F 9F RF
0
mdy no shear wall 1.15 3.3 3.15 2.89 2.74 2.6 2.56 2.65 2.73 3.06 2.3 GF 1F 2F 3F 4F 5F 6F 7F 8F 9F RF
ygn no shear wall 1.11 2.39 2.35 2.43 2.47 2.48 2.58 2.63 2.66 2.85 2.17
Axis Title
mdy with sw 1.34 3.19 3.11 3.24 3.34 3.42 3.44 3.42 3.39 3.37 2.87
ygn with shear wall 1 2.67 2.69 2.81 2.9 2.98 3.02 3.02 3.02 3.05 2.5 mdy no shear wall ygn no shear wall
storey mdy with sw ygn with shear wall

 Shear force values of Mandalay without shear wall are average 1.12 times greater than that of Yangon without shear wall.
 Shear force values of Mandalay with shear wall are average 1.16 times greater than that of Yangon with shear wall.
 Shear force values of Mandalay with shear wall are average 0.86 times greater than that of Mandalay without shear wall.
 Shear force values of Yangon with shear wall are average 0.89 times greater than that of Yangon without shear wall.

57
Comparison of Bending Moment between selected beams
Comparison of Bending Moment values for B1
25 25
Bending moment (kips-ft)

20
20

bending moment (kips-ft)

15

10 15

5
10
0
GF 1F 2F 3F 4F 5F 6F 7F 8F 9F RF
mdy no shear wall 16.91 22.026 21.362 20.594 20.45 20.398 19.862 19.43 18.791 17.47 14.93 5
ygn no shear wall 13.43 18.343 18.132 17.899 17.919 18.034 17.844 17.756 17.622 16.934 14.691
mdy with shear wall 15.451 18.735 17.584 18.259 18.987 19.881 20.631 21.234 21.906 22.45 19.4
0
ygn with shear wall 13.672 18.03 17.754 18.436 19.07 19.83 20.44 20.937 21.482 21.874 18.89
GF 1F 2F 3F 4F 5F 6F 7F 8F 9F RF
storey storey

 Bending moment values of Mandalay without shear wall are average 12.57 % greater than that of Yangon without shear wall.
 Bending moment values of Mandalay with shear wall are average 2.226 % greater than that of Yangon with shear wall.
 Bending moment values of Mandalay without shear wall are average 2.3542 % greater than that of Mandalay with shear wall.
 Bending moment values of Yangon without shear wall are average 11.77 % greater than that of Yangon with shear wall.

58
Comparison of Bending Moment values for B21

100 120
90
Bending moment (kips-ft)

80
70 100
60

bending moment (kips-ft)

50 80
40
30
20 60
10
0 40
GF 1F 2F 3F 4F 5F 6F 7F 8F 9F RF
mdy no shear wall 78.515 95.909 93.251 90.376 86.479 80.128 72.25 63.199 52.022 40.8 25.487
20
ygn no shear wall 36.84 50.7 48.79 47.26 45.466 42.667 38.751 34.83 30.159 24.823 16.6
mdy with shear wall 29.521 57.464 65.656 67.831 65.887 61.451 57.7 51.385 44.03 40.18 26.86
0
ygn with shear wall 13.59 31.54 34.08 34.36 33.1 30.85 28.41 25.6 22.64 20.357 13.829 GF 1F 2F 3F 4F 5F 6F 7F 8F 9F RF
storey
storey

 Bending moment values of Mandalay without shear wall are average 83.72 % greater than that of Yangon without shear wall.
 Bending moment values of Mandalay with shear wall are average 97.96 % greater than that of Yangon with shear wall.
 Bending moment values of Mandalay without shear wall are average 39.32 % greater than that of Mandalay with shear wall.
 Bending moment values of Yangon without shear wall are average 48.71 % greater than that of Yangon with shear wall.

59
Comparison of Bending Moment values for B32

10 12
Bending moment (kips-ft)

9
8
7 10
6

bending moment (kips-ft)

5 8
4
3
2 6
1
0 4
GF 1F 2F 3F 4F 5F 6F 7F 8F 9F RF
mdy no shear wall 2.426 7.998 7.278 6.335 5.906 5.655 5.54 6.17 6.866 8.187 6.339
2
ygn no shear wall 2.28 4.885 4.646 5.065 5.386 5.684 6.088 6.5117 6.982 7.677 6.276
mdy with shear wall 3.226 7.685 7.233 7.854 8.437 9.058 9.25 9.497 9.796 9.771 9.012
0
MDY WITH SW 1.902 6.264 6.29 6.9 7.449 8.066 8.327 8.65 9.04 9.094 8.378 GF 1F 2F 3F 4F 5F 6F 7F 8F 9F RF
storey storey

 Bending moment values of Mandalay without shear wall are average 13.885 % greater than that of Yangon without shear wall.
 Bending moment values of Mandalay with shear wall are average 17.35 % greater than that of Yangon with shear wall.
 Bending moment values of Mandalay with shear wall are average 34.59 % greater than that of Mandalay without shear wall.
 Bending moment values of Yangon with shear wall are average 28.59 % greater than that of Yangon without shear wall.

60
Discussion and conclusion

In this study, ten storeyed residential reinforced concrete building is analyzed for two different seismic zone
(Mandalay and Yangon) with and without shear wall by using ETABS version 9.7. And six stability checks is done for all
four models. All stability checks are found within the allowable limits.
• Both structural and non- structural members are of the same size for all four structures.
• The rebar percentage of column is within 1% and 6% according to ACI 318-05.
• The structures with shear wall have smaller displacement values as they have better stiffness than solely moment
resisting frames structures. But they have larger story shear due to the deformation of shear wall when the lateral
forces occur.
• As for different seismic zones, the displacement , story drift , overturning moment and base shear are more severe
in Mandalay zone.

61
Recommendation

1. The proposed building for this study is ten – storyed building. The further study should increase span

dimension and high rise building greater than ten storeyed.

2. The further study using the structural analysis and design were also made by the comparison of wind

velocity, loading condition, and soil type by using different codes.

3. Instead of reinforced concrete members, the structural steel should be used in further study.

4. The proposed building should be compared with different location of shear walls.

5. The design detailing should be carried out after the comparison of analysis results.

62
References

• American Concrete Institute, Building Code Requirement for Structural Concrete and Commentary ( ACI
318-05) (2005)
• Myanmar National Building Code (MNBC-2016) (2016)
• American Society of Civil Engineers: Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures (ASCE 7-
05) (2005)
• M.NADIM HASSOUN, AKTHEM AL-MANASEER : Structural Concrete Theory and Design (six edition)
• 2006 IBC : Structural Seismic Design Manual
• Ma Ingyin May : Comparative study on seismic performance of two different zones

60
Thanks for Your attention
&
Be Healthy

61