Logical truths are statements that do not depend on observation or require evidence to confirm

their true value. It does not need to be verified using all the sensory organs. Also, the truth value
can easily be determined from the language of the context. The truth value can solely be
determined from its logical form and definitions. For instance, the statement "innocent until proven
guilty" under legal law principles is a logical statement based on logical constructs.

On the other hand,empirical truths are statements whose truth value can only be determined from
observation, experience, and analysis. It also requires evidence from either one or more of the
sensory organs, and it usually occurs on a probabilistic basis. A case in point is the statement
“gravity causes objects to fall towards the center of the earth." This is empirical due to the number
of times humans have observed and tested it, and this happens due to the force of gravity acting on
any object thrown upwards.

Using practical instances, some typical examples of logical truths are: “All triangles have three
sides." This is logical because it does not require any empirical observation or evidence to prove
whether the statement is true, since it is already true by its definition of what a triangle is.
Again, the statement “2 + 2 = 4” is a logical statement based on the rules of arithmetic and logical
deduction. Also, it does not require any empirical observation, and it is universally accepted. And for
empirical truths, some practical examples are: The statement “Water boils at 100 degrees Celsius is
an empirical truth because it is based on several repeated experiments and observations to prove
that this statement is true. Also, the statement "the sun rises from the east and sets in the west" is
an empirical truth due to the movement of the sky and the sensory experience of observing the
repeated motion of the sky to verify this statement.

Additionally, logical and empirical truths play an important role at work and in everyday contexts.
This enables good decision-making where professionals are able to make sound choices. Logical
observations show strategies, and empirical data guides practical decisions. In problem solving,
logical truths enhance problem-solving techniques, while empirical truths inform practical solutions.
Also, this distinction helps in ethics and policy by understanding logical and empirical truths to
consider ethical acts, formulating policies and procedures, and considering evidence-based
practices. Again, acknowledging the distinction between empirical and logical truths ensures
effective communication. This helps us to analyze and breakdown the actual meaning of statements
easily, reveal evidence, and engage in discourse with others.

In conclusion, understanding the distinction between empirical truth and logical truth helps in
critical thinking, shapes our cognitive skills, enables us to have meaningful dialogue with people,
and enables us to make good decisions in both work and everyday life.