Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • ERA Rubrics

    Uploaded by

    永井茂
    1 views31 pages

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    1 views31 pages

    ERA Rubrics

    Uploaded by

    永井茂

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 31

    ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT

    Rubrics

    Beginning Developing Exemplary


    Accomplished (Yes, but)
    Criteria (Weight) (No) (No, but) (Yes)
    61 – 90%
    10 – 30% 31 – 60% 91-100%
    An accurate and complete
    The explanation is An accurate and complete An accurate and complete
    explanation of key concepts and
    sufficiently inaccurate, explanation of key concepts explanation of key concepts
    theories is made, drawing on
    incomplete, or confusing and theories is made, and theories is made,
    relevant literature. Enough detail is
    that the reader gains little drawing on relevant drawing on relevant
    presented to allow the reader to
    Content quality (40%) information from the literature. Insufficient literature. Enough detail is
    understand the content and make
    OR report. It appears that little detail is presented to allow presented to allow the
    judgments about it. In addition,
    1 – 40 Points attempt has been made to the reader to understand reader to understand the
    applications of theory are included
    help the reader understand the content and make content and make
    to illuminate issues.
    the material. judgments about it. judgments about it.
    Readers gain insights.
    4-12 points 13-24 points 25-36 points
    37-40 points
    Resources not cited in Some resources are cited
    All resources are cited, but All resources are cited and appear
    paper or proper format not but not all. Not formatted
    formatting isn’t correct with correct formatting.
    Referencing (30%) used. correctly
    OR
    Turnitin Rating: 10% – 20% Turnitin Rating: <10.00%
    1 – 30 Points Turnitin Rating: >50.00% Turnitin Rating: 20% – 50%
    19-27 points 28-30 points
    3-9 points 10-18 points
    Information is presented in
    Details and examples are Information is scattered Information is logically effective order. Excellent structure
    Organization and Thought
    not organized, are hard to and needs further ordered with paragraphs of paragraphs and transitions
    Process (30%)
    follow and understand development and transitions. enhances readability and
    OR
    comprehension.
    1 – 30 Points
    3-9 points 10-18 points 19-27 points
    28-30 points
    NAMES

    SECTION
    ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT
    Rubrics

    Beginning Developing Exemplary


    Accomplished (Yes, but)
    Criteria (Weight) (No) (No, but) (Yes)
    61 – 90%
    10 – 30% 31 – 60% 91-100%
    An accurate and complete
    The explanation is An accurate and complete An accurate and complete
    explanation of key concepts and
    sufficiently inaccurate, explanation of key concepts explanation of key concepts
    theories is made, drawing on
    incomplete, or confusing and theories is made, and theories is made,
    relevant literature. Enough detail is
    that the reader gains little drawing on relevant drawing on relevant
    presented to allow the reader to
    Content quality (40%) information from the literature. Insufficient literature. Enough detail is
    understand the content and make
    OR report. It appears that little detail is presented to allow presented to allow the
    judgments about it. In addition,
    1 – 40 Points attempt has been made to the reader to understand reader to understand the
    applications of theory are included
    help the reader understand the content and make content and make
    to illuminate issues.
    the material. judgments about it. judgments about it.
    Readers gain insights.
    4-12 points 13-24 points 25-36 points
    37-40 points
    Resources not cited in Some resources are cited
    All resources are cited, but All resources are cited and appear
    paper or proper format not but not all. Not formatted
    formatting isn’t correct with correct formatting.
    Referencing (30%) used. correctly
    OR
    Turnitin Rating: 10% – 20% Turnitin Rating: <10.00%
    1 – 30 Points Turnitin Rating: >50.00% Turnitin Rating: 20% – 50%
    19-27 points 28-30 points
    3-9 points 10-18 points
    Information is presented in
    Details and examples are Information is scattered Information is logically effective order. Excellent structure
    Organization and Thought
    not organized, are hard to and needs further ordered with paragraphs of paragraphs and transitions
    Process (30%)
    follow and understand development and transitions. enhances readability and
    OR
    comprehension.
    1 – 30 Points
    3-9 points 10-18 points 19-27 points
    28-30 points
    NAMES

    SECTION
    ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT
    Rubrics

    Beginning Developing Exemplary


    Accomplished (Yes, but)
    Criteria (Weight) (No) (No, but) (Yes)
    61 – 90%
    10 – 30% 31 – 60% 91-100%
    An accurate and complete
    The explanation is An accurate and complete An accurate and complete
    explanation of key concepts and
    sufficiently inaccurate, explanation of key concepts explanation of key concepts
    theories is made, drawing on
    incomplete, or confusing and theories is made, and theories is made,
    relevant literature. Enough detail is
    that the reader gains little drawing on relevant drawing on relevant
    presented to allow the reader to
    Content quality (40%) information from the literature. Insufficient literature. Enough detail is
    understand the content and make
    OR report. It appears that little detail is presented to allow presented to allow the
    judgments about it. In addition,
    1 – 40 Points attempt has been made to the reader to understand reader to understand the
    applications of theory are included
    help the reader understand the content and make content and make
    to illuminate issues.
    the material. judgments about it. judgments about it.
    Readers gain insights.
    4-12 points 13-24 points 25-36 points
    37-40 points
    Resources not cited in Some resources are cited
    All resources are cited, but All resources are cited and appear
    paper or proper format not but not all. Not formatted
    formatting isn’t correct with correct formatting.
    Referencing (30%) used. correctly
    OR
    Turnitin Rating: 10% – 20% Turnitin Rating: <10.00%
    1 – 30 Points Turnitin Rating: >50.00% Turnitin Rating: 20% – 50%
    19-27 points 28-30 points
    3-9 points 10-18 points
    Information is presented in
    Details and examples are Information is scattered Information is logically effective order. Excellent structure
    Organization and Thought
    not organized, are hard to and needs further ordered with paragraphs of paragraphs and transitions
    Process (30%)
    follow and understand development and transitions. enhances readability and
    OR
    comprehension.
    1 – 30 Points
    3-9 points 10-18 points 19-27 points
    28-30 points
    NAMES

    SECTION
    ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT
    Rubrics

    Beginning Developing Exemplary


    Accomplished (Yes, but)
    Criteria (Weight) (No) (No, but) (Yes)
    61 – 90%
    10 – 30% 31 – 60% 91-100%
    An accurate and complete
    The explanation is An accurate and complete An accurate and complete
    explanation of key concepts and
    sufficiently inaccurate, explanation of key concepts explanation of key concepts
    theories is made, drawing on
    incomplete, or confusing and theories is made, and theories is made,
    relevant literature. Enough detail is
    that the reader gains little drawing on relevant drawing on relevant
    presented to allow the reader to
    Content quality (40%) information from the literature. Insufficient literature. Enough detail is
    understand the content and make
    OR report. It appears that little detail is presented to allow presented to allow the
    judgments about it. In addition,
    1 – 40 Points attempt has been made to the reader to understand reader to understand the
    applications of theory are included
    help the reader understand the content and make content and make
    to illuminate issues.
    the material. judgments about it. judgments about it.
    Readers gain insights.
    4-12 points 13-24 points 25-36 points
    37-40 points
    Resources not cited in Some resources are cited
    All resources are cited, but All resources are cited and appear
    paper or proper format not but not all. Not formatted
    formatting isn’t correct with correct formatting.
    Referencing (30%) used. correctly
    OR
    Turnitin Rating: 10% – 20% Turnitin Rating: <10.00%
    1 – 30 Points Turnitin Rating: >50.00% Turnitin Rating: 20% – 50%
    19-27 points 28-30 points
    3-9 points 10-18 points
    Information is presented in
    Details and examples are Information is scattered Information is logically effective order. Excellent structure
    Organization and Thought
    not organized, are hard to and needs further ordered with paragraphs of paragraphs and transitions
    Process (30%)
    follow and understand development and transitions. enhances readability and
    OR
    comprehension.
    1 – 30 Points
    3-9 points 10-18 points 19-27 points
    28-30 points
    NAMES

    SECTION
    ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT
    Rubrics

    Beginning Developing Exemplary


    Accomplished (Yes, but)
    Criteria (Weight) (No) (No, but) (Yes)
    61 – 90%
    10 – 30% 31 – 60% 91-100%
    An accurate and complete
    The explanation is An accurate and complete An accurate and complete
    explanation of key concepts and
    sufficiently inaccurate, explanation of key concepts explanation of key concepts
    theories is made, drawing on
    incomplete, or confusing and theories is made, and theories is made,
    relevant literature. Enough detail is
    that the reader gains little drawing on relevant drawing on relevant
    presented to allow the reader to
    Content quality (40%) information from the literature. Insufficient literature. Enough detail is
    understand the content and make
    OR report. It appears that little detail is presented to allow presented to allow the
    judgments about it. In addition,
    1 – 40 Points attempt has been made to the reader to understand reader to understand the
    applications of theory are included
    help the reader understand the content and make content and make
    to illuminate issues.
    the material. judgments about it. judgments about it.
    Readers gain insights.
    4-12 points 13-24 points 25-36 points
    37-40 points
    Resources not cited in Some resources are cited
    All resources are cited, but All resources are cited and appear
    paper or proper format not but not all. Not formatted
    formatting isn’t correct with correct formatting.
    Referencing (30%) used. correctly
    OR
    Turnitin Rating: 10% – 20% Turnitin Rating: <10.00%
    1 – 30 Points Turnitin Rating: >50.00% Turnitin Rating: 20% – 50%
    19-27 points 28-30 points
    3-9 points 10-18 points
    Information is presented in
    Details and examples are Information is scattered Information is logically effective order. Excellent structure
    Organization and Thought
    not organized, are hard to and needs further ordered with paragraphs of paragraphs and transitions
    Process (30%)
    follow and understand development and transitions. enhances readability and
    OR
    comprehension.
    1 – 30 Points
    3-9 points 10-18 points 19-27 points
    28-30 points
    NAMES

    SECTION
    ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT
    Rubrics

    Beginning Developing Exemplary


    Accomplished (Yes, but)
    Criteria (Weight) (No) (No, but) (Yes)
    61 – 90%
    10 – 30% 31 – 60% 91-100%
    An accurate and complete
    The explanation is An accurate and complete An accurate and complete
    explanation of key concepts and
    sufficiently inaccurate, explanation of key concepts explanation of key concepts
    theories is made, drawing on
    incomplete, or confusing and theories is made, and theories is made,
    relevant literature. Enough detail is
    that the reader gains little drawing on relevant drawing on relevant
    presented to allow the reader to
    Content quality (40%) information from the literature. Insufficient literature. Enough detail is
    understand the content and make
    OR report. It appears that little detail is presented to allow presented to allow the
    judgments about it. In addition,
    1 – 40 Points attempt has been made to the reader to understand reader to understand the
    applications of theory are included
    help the reader understand the content and make content and make
    to illuminate issues.
    the material. judgments about it. judgments about it.
    Readers gain insights.
    4-12 points 13-24 points 25-36 points
    37-40 points
    Resources not cited in Some resources are cited
    All resources are cited, but All resources are cited and appear
    paper or proper format not but not all. Not formatted
    formatting isn’t correct with correct formatting.
    Referencing (30%) used. correctly
    OR
    Turnitin Rating: 10% – 20% Turnitin Rating: <10.00%
    1 – 30 Points Turnitin Rating: >50.00% Turnitin Rating: 20% – 50%
    19-27 points 28-30 points
    3-9 points 10-18 points
    Information is presented in
    Details and examples are Information is scattered Information is logically effective order. Excellent structure
    Organization and Thought
    not organized, are hard to and needs further ordered with paragraphs of paragraphs and transitions
    Process (30%)
    follow and understand development and transitions. enhances readability and
    OR
    comprehension.
    1 – 30 Points
    3-9 points 10-18 points 19-27 points
    28-30 points
    NAMES

    SECTION
    ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT
    Rubrics

    Beginning Developing Exemplary


    Accomplished (Yes, but)
    Criteria (Weight) (No) (No, but) (Yes)
    61 – 90%
    10 – 30% 31 – 60% 91-100%
    An accurate and complete
    The explanation is An accurate and complete An accurate and complete
    explanation of key concepts and
    sufficiently inaccurate, explanation of key concepts explanation of key concepts
    theories is made, drawing on
    incomplete, or confusing and theories is made, and theories is made,
    relevant literature. Enough detail is
    that the reader gains little drawing on relevant drawing on relevant
    presented to allow the reader to
    Content quality (40%) information from the literature. Insufficient literature. Enough detail is
    understand the content and make
    OR report. It appears that little detail is presented to allow presented to allow the
    judgments about it. In addition,
    1 – 40 Points attempt has been made to the reader to understand reader to understand the
    applications of theory are included
    help the reader understand the content and make content and make
    to illuminate issues.
    the material. judgments about it. judgments about it.
    Readers gain insights.
    4-12 points 13-24 points 25-36 points
    37-40 points
    Resources not cited in Some resources are cited
    All resources are cited, but All resources are cited and appear
    paper or proper format not but not all. Not formatted
    formatting isn’t correct with correct formatting.
    Referencing (30%) used. correctly
    OR
    Turnitin Rating: 10% – 20% Turnitin Rating: <10.00%
    1 – 30 Points Turnitin Rating: >50.00% Turnitin Rating: 20% – 50%
    19-27 points 28-30 points
    3-9 points 10-18 points
    Information is presented in
    Details and examples are Information is scattered Information is logically effective order. Excellent structure
    Organization and Thought
    not organized, are hard to and needs further ordered with paragraphs of paragraphs and transitions
    Process (30%)
    follow and understand development and transitions. enhances readability and
    OR
    comprehension.
    1 – 30 Points
    3-9 points 10-18 points 19-27 points
    28-30 points
    NAMES

    SECTION
    ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT
    Rubrics

    Beginning Developing Exemplary


    Accomplished (Yes, but)
    Criteria (Weight) (No) (No, but) (Yes)
    61 – 90%
    10 – 30% 31 – 60% 91-100%
    An accurate and complete
    The explanation is An accurate and complete An accurate and complete
    explanation of key concepts and
    sufficiently inaccurate, explanation of key concepts explanation of key concepts
    theories is made, drawing on
    incomplete, or confusing and theories is made, and theories is made,
    relevant literature. Enough detail is
    that the reader gains little drawing on relevant drawing on relevant
    presented to allow the reader to
    Content quality (40%) information from the literature. Insufficient literature. Enough detail is
    understand the content and make
    OR report. It appears that little detail is presented to allow presented to allow the
    judgments about it. In addition,
    1 – 40 Points attempt has been made to the reader to understand reader to understand the
    applications of theory are included
    help the reader understand the content and make content and make
    to illuminate issues.
    the material. judgments about it. judgments about it.
    Readers gain insights.
    4-12 points 13-24 points 25-36 points
    37-40 points
    Resources not cited in Some resources are cited
    All resources are cited, but All resources are cited and appear
    paper or proper format not but not all. Not formatted
    formatting isn’t correct with correct formatting.
    Referencing (30%) used. correctly
    OR
    Turnitin Rating: 10% – 20% Turnitin Rating: <10.00%
    1 – 30 Points Turnitin Rating: >50.00% Turnitin Rating: 20% – 50%
    19-27 points 28-30 points
    3-9 points 10-18 points
    Information is presented in
    Details and examples are Information is scattered Information is logically effective order. Excellent structure
    Organization and Thought
    not organized, are hard to and needs further ordered with paragraphs of paragraphs and transitions
    Process (30%)
    follow and understand development and transitions. enhances readability and
    OR
    comprehension.
    1 – 30 Points
    3-9 points 10-18 points 19-27 points
    28-30 points
    NAMES

    SECTION
    ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT
    Rubrics

    Beginning Developing Exemplary


    Accomplished (Yes, but)
    Criteria (Weight) (No) (No, but) (Yes)
    61 – 90%
    10 – 30% 31 – 60% 91-100%
    An accurate and complete
    The explanation is An accurate and complete An accurate and complete
    explanation of key concepts and
    sufficiently inaccurate, explanation of key concepts explanation of key concepts
    theories is made, drawing on
    incomplete, or confusing and theories is made, and theories is made,
    relevant literature. Enough detail is
    that the reader gains little drawing on relevant drawing on relevant
    presented to allow the reader to
    Content quality (40%) information from the literature. Insufficient literature. Enough detail is
    understand the content and make
    OR report. It appears that little detail is presented to allow presented to allow the
    judgments about it. In addition,
    1 – 40 Points attempt has been made to the reader to understand reader to understand the
    applications of theory are included
    help the reader understand the content and make content and make
    to illuminate issues.
    the material. judgments about it. judgments about it.
    Readers gain insights.
    4-12 points 13-24 points 25-36 points
    37-40 points
    Resources not cited in Some resources are cited
    All resources are cited, but All resources are cited and appear
    paper or proper format not but not all. Not formatted
    formatting isn’t correct with correct formatting.
    Referencing (30%) used. correctly
    OR
    Turnitin Rating: 10% – 20% Turnitin Rating: <10.00%
    1 – 30 Points Turnitin Rating: >50.00% Turnitin Rating: 20% – 50%
    19-27 points 28-30 points
    3-9 points 10-18 points
    Information is presented in
    Details and examples are Information is scattered Information is logically effective order. Excellent structure
    Organization and Thought
    not organized, are hard to and needs further ordered with paragraphs of paragraphs and transitions
    Process (30%)
    follow and understand development and transitions. enhances readability and
    OR
    comprehension.
    1 – 30 Points
    3-9 points 10-18 points 19-27 points
    28-30 points
    NAMES

    SECTION
    ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT
    Rubrics

    Beginning Developing Exemplary


    Accomplished (Yes, but)
    Criteria (Weight) (No) (No, but) (Yes)
    61 – 90%
    10 – 30% 31 – 60% 91-100%
    An accurate and complete
    The explanation is An accurate and complete An accurate and complete
    explanation of key concepts and
    sufficiently inaccurate, explanation of key concepts explanation of key concepts
    theories is made, drawing on
    incomplete, or confusing and theories is made, and theories is made,
    relevant literature. Enough detail is
    that the reader gains little drawing on relevant drawing on relevant
    presented to allow the reader to
    Content quality (40%) information from the literature. Insufficient literature. Enough detail is
    understand the content and make
    OR report. It appears that little detail is presented to allow presented to allow the
    judgments about it. In addition,
    1 – 40 Points attempt has been made to the reader to understand reader to understand the
    applications of theory are included
    help the reader understand the content and make content and make
    to illuminate issues.
    the material. judgments about it. judgments about it.
    Readers gain insights.
    4-12 points 13-24 points 25-36 points
    37-40 points
    Resources not cited in Some resources are cited
    All resources are cited, but All resources are cited and appear
    paper or proper format not but not all. Not formatted
    formatting isn’t correct with correct formatting.
    Referencing (30%) used. correctly
    OR
    Turnitin Rating: 10% – 20% Turnitin Rating: <10.00%
    1 – 30 Points Turnitin Rating: >50.00% Turnitin Rating: 20% – 50%
    19-27 points 28-30 points
    3-9 points 10-18 points
    Information is presented in
    Details and examples are Information is scattered Information is logically effective order. Excellent structure
    Organization and Thought
    not organized, are hard to and needs further ordered with paragraphs of paragraphs and transitions
    Process (30%)
    follow and understand development and transitions. enhances readability and
    OR
    comprehension.
    1 – 30 Points
    3-9 points 10-18 points 19-27 points
    28-30 points
    NAMES

    SECTION
    ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT
    Rubrics

    Beginning Developing Exemplary


    Accomplished (Yes, but)
    Criteria (Weight) (No) (No, but) (Yes)
    61 – 90%
    10 – 30% 31 – 60% 91-100%
    An accurate and complete
    The explanation is An accurate and complete An accurate and complete
    explanation of key concepts and
    sufficiently inaccurate, explanation of key concepts explanation of key concepts
    theories is made, drawing on
    incomplete, or confusing and theories is made, and theories is made,
    relevant literature. Enough detail is
    that the reader gains little drawing on relevant drawing on relevant
    presented to allow the reader to
    Content quality (40%) information from the literature. Insufficient literature. Enough detail is
    understand the content and make
    OR report. It appears that little detail is presented to allow presented to allow the
    judgments about it. In addition,
    1 – 40 Points attempt has been made to the reader to understand reader to understand the
    applications of theory are included
    help the reader understand the content and make content and make
    to illuminate issues.
    the material. judgments about it. judgments about it.
    Readers gain insights.
    4-12 points 13-24 points 25-36 points
    37-40 points
    Resources not cited in Some resources are cited
    All resources are cited, but All resources are cited and appear
    paper or proper format not but not all. Not formatted
    formatting isn’t correct with correct formatting.
    Referencing (30%) used. correctly
    OR
    Turnitin Rating: 10% – 20% Turnitin Rating: <10.00%
    1 – 30 Points Turnitin Rating: >50.00% Turnitin Rating: 20% – 50%
    19-27 points 28-30 points
    3-9 points 10-18 points
    Information is presented in
    Details and examples are Information is scattered Information is logically effective order. Excellent structure
    Organization and Thought
    not organized, are hard to and needs further ordered with paragraphs of paragraphs and transitions
    Process (30%)
    follow and understand development and transitions. enhances readability and
    OR
    comprehension.
    1 – 30 Points
    3-9 points 10-18 points 19-27 points
    28-30 points
    NAMES

    SECTION
    ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT
    Rubrics

    Beginning Developing Exemplary


    Accomplished (Yes, but)
    Criteria (Weight) (No) (No, but) (Yes)
    61 – 90%
    10 – 30% 31 – 60% 91-100%
    An accurate and complete
    The explanation is An accurate and complete An accurate and complete
    explanation of key concepts and
    sufficiently inaccurate, explanation of key concepts explanation of key concepts
    theories is made, drawing on
    incomplete, or confusing and theories is made, and theories is made,
    relevant literature. Enough detail is
    that the reader gains little drawing on relevant drawing on relevant
    presented to allow the reader to
    Content quality (40%) information from the literature. Insufficient literature. Enough detail is
    understand the content and make
    OR report. It appears that little detail is presented to allow presented to allow the
    judgments about it. In addition,
    1 – 40 Points attempt has been made to the reader to understand reader to understand the
    applications of theory are included
    help the reader understand the content and make content and make
    to illuminate issues.
    the material. judgments about it. judgments about it.
    Readers gain insights.
    4-12 points 13-24 points 25-36 points
    37-40 points
    Resources not cited in Some resources are cited
    All resources are cited, but All resources are cited and appear
    paper or proper format not but not all. Not formatted
    formatting isn’t correct with correct formatting.
    Referencing (30%) used. correctly
    OR
    Turnitin Rating: 10% – 20% Turnitin Rating: <10.00%
    1 – 30 Points Turnitin Rating: >50.00% Turnitin Rating: 20% – 50%
    19-27 points 28-30 points
    3-9 points 10-18 points
    Information is presented in
    Details and examples are Information is scattered Information is logically effective order. Excellent structure
    Organization and Thought
    not organized, are hard to and needs further ordered with paragraphs of paragraphs and transitions
    Process (30%)
    follow and understand development and transitions. enhances readability and
    OR
    comprehension.
    1 – 30 Points
    3-9 points 10-18 points 19-27 points
    28-30 points
    NAMES

    SECTION
    ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT
    Rubrics

    Beginning Developing Exemplary


    Accomplished (Yes, but)
    Criteria (Weight) (No) (No, but) (Yes)
    61 – 90%
    10 – 30% 31 – 60% 91-100%
    An accurate and complete
    The explanation is An accurate and complete An accurate and complete
    explanation of key concepts and
    sufficiently inaccurate, explanation of key concepts explanation of key concepts
    theories is made, drawing on
    incomplete, or confusing and theories is made, and theories is made,
    relevant literature. Enough detail is
    that the reader gains little drawing on relevant drawing on relevant
    presented to allow the reader to
    Content quality (40%) information from the literature. Insufficient literature. Enough detail is
    understand the content and make
    OR report. It appears that little detail is presented to allow presented to allow the
    judgments about it. In addition,
    1 – 40 Points attempt has been made to the reader to understand reader to understand the
    applications of theory are included
    help the reader understand the content and make content and make
    to illuminate issues.
    the material. judgments about it. judgments about it.
    Readers gain insights.
    4-12 points 13-24 points 25-36 points
    37-40 points
    Resources not cited in Some resources are cited
    All resources are cited, but All resources are cited and appear
    paper or proper format not but not all. Not formatted
    formatting isn’t correct with correct formatting.
    Referencing (30%) used. correctly
    OR
    Turnitin Rating: 10% – 20% Turnitin Rating: <10.00%
    1 – 30 Points Turnitin Rating: >50.00% Turnitin Rating: 20% – 50%
    19-27 points 28-30 points
    3-9 points 10-18 points
    Information is presented in
    Details and examples are Information is scattered Information is logically effective order. Excellent structure
    Organization and Thought
    not organized, are hard to and needs further ordered with paragraphs of paragraphs and transitions
    Process (30%)
    follow and understand development and transitions. enhances readability and
    OR
    comprehension.
    1 – 30 Points
    3-9 points 10-18 points 19-27 points
    28-30 points
    NAMES

    SECTION
    ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT
    Rubrics

    Beginning Developing Exemplary


    Accomplished (Yes, but)
    Criteria (Weight) (No) (No, but) (Yes)
    61 – 90%
    10 – 30% 31 – 60% 91-100%
    An accurate and complete
    The explanation is An accurate and complete An accurate and complete
    explanation of key concepts and
    sufficiently inaccurate, explanation of key concepts explanation of key concepts
    theories is made, drawing on
    incomplete, or confusing and theories is made, and theories is made,
    relevant literature. Enough detail is
    that the reader gains little drawing on relevant drawing on relevant
    presented to allow the reader to
    Content quality (40%) information from the literature. Insufficient literature. Enough detail is
    understand the content and make
    OR report. It appears that little detail is presented to allow presented to allow the
    judgments about it. In addition,
    1 – 40 Points attempt has been made to the reader to understand reader to understand the
    applications of theory are included
    help the reader understand the content and make content and make
    to illuminate issues.
    the material. judgments about it. judgments about it.
    Readers gain insights.
    4-12 points 13-24 points 25-36 points
    37-40 points
    Resources not cited in Some resources are cited
    All resources are cited, but All resources are cited and appear
    paper or proper format not but not all. Not formatted
    formatting isn’t correct with correct formatting.
    Referencing (30%) used. correctly
    OR
    Turnitin Rating: 10% – 20% Turnitin Rating: <10.00%
    1 – 30 Points Turnitin Rating: >50.00% Turnitin Rating: 20% – 50%
    19-27 points 28-30 points
    3-9 points 10-18 points
    Information is presented in
    Details and examples are Information is scattered Information is logically effective order. Excellent structure
    Organization and Thought
    not organized, are hard to and needs further ordered with paragraphs of paragraphs and transitions
    Process (30%)
    follow and understand development and transitions. enhances readability and
    OR
    comprehension.
    1 – 30 Points
    3-9 points 10-18 points 19-27 points
    28-30 points
    NAMES

    SECTION
    ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT
    Rubrics

    Beginning Developing Exemplary


    Accomplished (Yes, but)
    Criteria (Weight) (No) (No, but) (Yes)
    61 – 90%
    10 – 30% 31 – 60% 91-100%
    An accurate and complete
    The explanation is An accurate and complete An accurate and complete
    explanation of key concepts and
    sufficiently inaccurate, explanation of key concepts explanation of key concepts
    theories is made, drawing on
    incomplete, or confusing and theories is made, and theories is made,
    relevant literature. Enough detail is
    that the reader gains little drawing on relevant drawing on relevant
    presented to allow the reader to
    Content quality (40%) information from the literature. Insufficient literature. Enough detail is
    understand the content and make
    OR report. It appears that little detail is presented to allow presented to allow the
    judgments about it. In addition,
    1 – 40 Points attempt has been made to the reader to understand reader to understand the
    applications of theory are included
    help the reader understand the content and make content and make
    to illuminate issues.
    the material. judgments about it. judgments about it.
    Readers gain insights.
    4-12 points 13-24 points 25-36 points
    37-40 points
    Resources not cited in Some resources are cited
    All resources are cited, but All resources are cited and appear
    paper or proper format not but not all. Not formatted
    formatting isn’t correct with correct formatting.
    Referencing (30%) used. correctly
    OR
    Turnitin Rating: 10% – 20% Turnitin Rating: <10.00%
    1 – 30 Points Turnitin Rating: >50.00% Turnitin Rating: 20% – 50%
    19-27 points 28-30 points
    3-9 points 10-18 points
    Information is presented in
    Details and examples are Information is scattered Information is logically effective order. Excellent structure
    Organization and Thought
    not organized, are hard to and needs further ordered with paragraphs of paragraphs and transitions
    Process (30%)
    follow and understand development and transitions. enhances readability and
    OR
    comprehension.
    1 – 30 Points
    3-9 points 10-18 points 19-27 points
    28-30 points
    NAMES

    SECTION
    ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT
    Rubrics

    Beginning Developing Exemplary


    Accomplished (Yes, but)
    Criteria (Weight) (No) (No, but) (Yes)
    61 – 90%
    10 – 30% 31 – 60% 91-100%
    An accurate and complete
    The explanation is An accurate and complete An accurate and complete
    explanation of key concepts and
    sufficiently inaccurate, explanation of key concepts explanation of key concepts
    theories is made, drawing on
    incomplete, or confusing and theories is made, and theories is made,
    relevant literature. Enough detail is
    that the reader gains little drawing on relevant drawing on relevant
    presented to allow the reader to
    Content quality (40%) information from the literature. Insufficient literature. Enough detail is
    understand the content and make
    OR report. It appears that little detail is presented to allow presented to allow the
    judgments about it. In addition,
    1 – 40 Points attempt has been made to the reader to understand reader to understand the
    applications of theory are included
    help the reader understand the content and make content and make
    to illuminate issues.
    the material. judgments about it. judgments about it.
    Readers gain insights.
    4-12 points 13-24 points 25-36 points
    37-40 points
    Resources not cited in Some resources are cited
    All resources are cited, but All resources are cited and appear
    paper or proper format not but not all. Not formatted
    formatting isn’t correct with correct formatting.
    Referencing (30%) used. correctly
    OR
    Turnitin Rating: 10% – 20% Turnitin Rating: <10.00%
    1 – 30 Points Turnitin Rating: >50.00% Turnitin Rating: 20% – 50%
    19-27 points 28-30 points
    3-9 points 10-18 points
    Information is presented in
    Details and examples are Information is scattered Information is logically effective order. Excellent structure
    Organization and Thought
    not organized, are hard to and needs further ordered with paragraphs of paragraphs and transitions
    Process (30%)
    follow and understand development and transitions. enhances readability and
    OR
    comprehension.
    1 – 30 Points
    3-9 points 10-18 points 19-27 points
    28-30 points
    NAMES

    SECTION
    ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT
    Rubrics

    Beginning Developing Exemplary


    Accomplished (Yes, but)
    Criteria (Weight) (No) (No, but) (Yes)
    61 – 90%
    10 – 30% 31 – 60% 91-100%
    An accurate and complete
    The explanation is An accurate and complete An accurate and complete
    explanation of key concepts and
    sufficiently inaccurate, explanation of key concepts explanation of key concepts
    theories is made, drawing on
    incomplete, or confusing and theories is made, and theories is made,
    relevant literature. Enough detail is
    that the reader gains little drawing on relevant drawing on relevant
    presented to allow the reader to
    Content quality (40%) information from the literature. Insufficient literature. Enough detail is
    understand the content and make
    OR report. It appears that little detail is presented to allow presented to allow the
    judgments about it. In addition,
    1 – 40 Points attempt has been made to the reader to understand reader to understand the
    applications of theory are included
    help the reader understand the content and make content and make
    to illuminate issues.
    the material. judgments about it. judgments about it.
    Readers gain insights.
    4-12 points 13-24 points 25-36 points
    37-40 points
    Resources not cited in Some resources are cited
    All resources are cited, but All resources are cited and appear
    paper or proper format not but not all. Not formatted
    formatting isn’t correct with correct formatting.
    Referencing (30%) used. correctly
    OR
    Turnitin Rating: 10% – 20% Turnitin Rating: <10.00%
    1 – 30 Points Turnitin Rating: >50.00% Turnitin Rating: 20% – 50%
    19-27 points 28-30 points
    3-9 points 10-18 points
    Information is presented in
    Details and examples are Information is scattered Information is logically effective order. Excellent structure
    Organization and Thought
    not organized, are hard to and needs further ordered with paragraphs of paragraphs and transitions
    Process (30%)
    follow and understand development and transitions. enhances readability and
    OR
    comprehension.
    1 – 30 Points
    3-9 points 10-18 points 19-27 points
    28-30 points
    NAMES

    SECTION
    ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT
    Rubrics

    Beginning Developing Exemplary


    Accomplished (Yes, but)
    Criteria (Weight) (No) (No, but) (Yes)
    61 – 90%
    10 – 30% 31 – 60% 91-100%
    An accurate and complete
    The explanation is An accurate and complete An accurate and complete
    explanation of key concepts and
    sufficiently inaccurate, explanation of key concepts explanation of key concepts
    theories is made, drawing on
    incomplete, or confusing and theories is made, and theories is made,
    relevant literature. Enough detail is
    that the reader gains little drawing on relevant drawing on relevant
    presented to allow the reader to
    Content quality (40%) information from the literature. Insufficient literature. Enough detail is
    understand the content and make
    OR report. It appears that little detail is presented to allow presented to allow the
    judgments about it. In addition,
    1 – 40 Points attempt has been made to the reader to understand reader to understand the
    applications of theory are included
    help the reader understand the content and make content and make
    to illuminate issues.
    the material. judgments about it. judgments about it.
    Readers gain insights.
    4-12 points 13-24 points 25-36 points
    37-40 points
    Resources not cited in Some resources are cited
    All resources are cited, but All resources are cited and appear
    paper or proper format not but not all. Not formatted
    formatting isn’t correct with correct formatting.
    Referencing (30%) used. correctly
    OR
    Turnitin Rating: 10% – 20% Turnitin Rating: <10.00%
    1 – 30 Points Turnitin Rating: >50.00% Turnitin Rating: 20% – 50%
    19-27 points 28-30 points
    3-9 points 10-18 points
    Information is presented in
    Details and examples are Information is scattered Information is logically effective order. Excellent structure
    Organization and Thought
    not organized, are hard to and needs further ordered with paragraphs of paragraphs and transitions
    Process (30%)
    follow and understand development and transitions. enhances readability and
    OR
    comprehension.
    1 – 30 Points
    3-9 points 10-18 points 19-27 points
    28-30 points
    NAMES

    SECTION
    ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT
    Rubrics

    Beginning Developing Exemplary


    Accomplished (Yes, but)
    Criteria (Weight) (No) (No, but) (Yes)
    61 – 90%
    10 – 30% 31 – 60% 91-100%
    An accurate and complete
    The explanation is An accurate and complete An accurate and complete
    explanation of key concepts and
    sufficiently inaccurate, explanation of key concepts explanation of key concepts
    theories is made, drawing on
    incomplete, or confusing and theories is made, and theories is made,
    relevant literature. Enough detail is
    that the reader gains little drawing on relevant drawing on relevant
    presented to allow the reader to
    Content quality (40%) information from the literature. Insufficient literature. Enough detail is
    understand the content and make
    OR report. It appears that little detail is presented to allow presented to allow the
    judgments about it. In addition,
    1 – 40 Points attempt has been made to the reader to understand reader to understand the
    applications of theory are included
    help the reader understand the content and make content and make
    to illuminate issues.
    the material. judgments about it. judgments about it.
    Readers gain insights.
    4-12 points 13-24 points 25-36 points
    37-40 points
    Resources not cited in Some resources are cited
    All resources are cited, but All resources are cited and appear
    paper or proper format not but not all. Not formatted
    formatting isn’t correct with correct formatting.
    Referencing (30%) used. correctly
    OR
    Turnitin Rating: 10% – 20% Turnitin Rating: <10.00%
    1 – 30 Points Turnitin Rating: >50.00% Turnitin Rating: 20% – 50%
    19-27 points 28-30 points
    3-9 points 10-18 points
    Information is presented in
    Details and examples are Information is scattered Information is logically effective order. Excellent structure
    Organization and Thought
    not organized, are hard to and needs further ordered with paragraphs of paragraphs and transitions
    Process (30%)
    follow and understand development and transitions. enhances readability and
    OR
    comprehension.
    1 – 30 Points
    3-9 points 10-18 points 19-27 points
    28-30 points
    NAMES

    SECTION
    ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT
    Rubrics

    Beginning Developing Exemplary


    Accomplished (Yes, but)
    Criteria (Weight) (No) (No, but) (Yes)
    61 – 90%
    10 – 30% 31 – 60% 91-100%
    An accurate and complete
    The explanation is An accurate and complete An accurate and complete
    explanation of key concepts and
    sufficiently inaccurate, explanation of key concepts explanation of key concepts
    theories is made, drawing on
    incomplete, or confusing and theories is made, and theories is made,
    relevant literature. Enough detail is
    that the reader gains little drawing on relevant drawing on relevant
    presented to allow the reader to
    Content quality (40%) information from the literature. Insufficient literature. Enough detail is
    understand the content and make
    OR report. It appears that little detail is presented to allow presented to allow the
    judgments about it. In addition,
    1 – 40 Points attempt has been made to the reader to understand reader to understand the
    applications of theory are included
    help the reader understand the content and make content and make
    to illuminate issues.
    the material. judgments about it. judgments about it.
    Readers gain insights.
    4-12 points 13-24 points 25-36 points
    37-40 points
    Resources not cited in Some resources are cited
    All resources are cited, but All resources are cited and appear
    paper or proper format not but not all. Not formatted
    formatting isn’t correct with correct formatting.
    Referencing (30%) used. correctly
    OR
    Turnitin Rating: 10% – 20% Turnitin Rating: <10.00%
    1 – 30 Points Turnitin Rating: >50.00% Turnitin Rating: 20% – 50%
    19-27 points 28-30 points
    3-9 points 10-18 points
    Information is presented in
    Details and examples are Information is scattered Information is logically effective order. Excellent structure
    Organization and Thought
    not organized, are hard to and needs further ordered with paragraphs of paragraphs and transitions
    Process (30%)
    follow and understand development and transitions. enhances readability and
    OR
    comprehension.
    1 – 30 Points
    3-9 points 10-18 points 19-27 points
    28-30 points
    NAMES

    SECTION
    ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT
    Rubrics

    Beginning Developing Exemplary


    Accomplished (Yes, but)
    Criteria (Weight) (No) (No, but) (Yes)
    61 – 90%
    10 – 30% 31 – 60% 91-100%
    An accurate and complete
    The explanation is An accurate and complete An accurate and complete
    explanation of key concepts and
    sufficiently inaccurate, explanation of key concepts explanation of key concepts
    theories is made, drawing on
    incomplete, or confusing and theories is made, and theories is made,
    relevant literature. Enough detail is
    that the reader gains little drawing on relevant drawing on relevant
    presented to allow the reader to
    Content quality (40%) information from the literature. Insufficient literature. Enough detail is
    understand the content and make
    OR report. It appears that little detail is presented to allow presented to allow the
    judgments about it. In addition,
    1 – 40 Points attempt has been made to the reader to understand reader to understand the
    applications of theory are included
    help the reader understand the content and make content and make
    to illuminate issues.
    the material. judgments about it. judgments about it.
    Readers gain insights.
    4-12 points 13-24 points 25-36 points
    37-40 points
    Resources not cited in Some resources are cited
    All resources are cited, but All resources are cited and appear
    paper or proper format not but not all. Not formatted
    formatting isn’t correct with correct formatting.
    Referencing (30%) used. correctly
    OR
    Turnitin Rating: 10% – 20% Turnitin Rating: <10.00%
    1 – 30 Points Turnitin Rating: >50.00% Turnitin Rating: 20% – 50%
    19-27 points 28-30 points
    3-9 points 10-18 points
    Information is presented in
    Details and examples are Information is scattered Information is logically effective order. Excellent structure
    Organization and Thought
    not organized, are hard to and needs further ordered with paragraphs of paragraphs and transitions
    Process (30%)
    follow and understand development and transitions. enhances readability and
    OR
    comprehension.
    1 – 30 Points
    3-9 points 10-18 points 19-27 points
    28-30 points
    NAMES

    SECTION
    ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT
    Rubrics

    Beginning Developing Exemplary


    Accomplished (Yes, but)
    Criteria (Weight) (No) (No, but) (Yes)
    61 – 90%
    10 – 30% 31 – 60% 91-100%
    An accurate and complete
    The explanation is An accurate and complete An accurate and complete
    explanation of key concepts and
    sufficiently inaccurate, explanation of key concepts explanation of key concepts
    theories is made, drawing on
    incomplete, or confusing and theories is made, and theories is made,
    relevant literature. Enough detail is
    that the reader gains little drawing on relevant drawing on relevant
    presented to allow the reader to
    Content quality (40%) information from the literature. Insufficient literature. Enough detail is
    understand the content and make
    OR report. It appears that little detail is presented to allow presented to allow the
    judgments about it. In addition,
    1 – 40 Points attempt has been made to the reader to understand reader to understand the
    applications of theory are included
    help the reader understand the content and make content and make
    to illuminate issues.
    the material. judgments about it. judgments about it.
    Readers gain insights.
    4-12 points 13-24 points 25-36 points
    37-40 points
    Resources not cited in Some resources are cited
    All resources are cited, but All resources are cited and appear
    paper or proper format not but not all. Not formatted
    formatting isn’t correct with correct formatting.
    Referencing (30%) used. correctly
    OR
    Turnitin Rating: 10% – 20% Turnitin Rating: <10.00%
    1 – 30 Points Turnitin Rating: >50.00% Turnitin Rating: 20% – 50%
    19-27 points 28-30 points
    3-9 points 10-18 points
    Information is presented in
    Details and examples are Information is scattered Information is logically effective order. Excellent structure
    Organization and Thought
    not organized, are hard to and needs further ordered with paragraphs of paragraphs and transitions
    Process (30%)
    follow and understand development and transitions. enhances readability and
    OR
    comprehension.
    1 – 30 Points
    3-9 points 10-18 points 19-27 points
    28-30 points
    NAMES

    SECTION
    ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT
    Rubrics

    Beginning Developing Exemplary


    Accomplished (Yes, but)
    Criteria (Weight) (No) (No, but) (Yes)
    61 – 90%
    10 – 30% 31 – 60% 91-100%
    An accurate and complete
    The explanation is An accurate and complete An accurate and complete
    explanation of key concepts and
    sufficiently inaccurate, explanation of key concepts explanation of key concepts
    theories is made, drawing on
    incomplete, or confusing and theories is made, and theories is made,
    relevant literature. Enough detail is
    that the reader gains little drawing on relevant drawing on relevant
    presented to allow the reader to
    Content quality (40%) information from the literature. Insufficient literature. Enough detail is
    understand the content and make
    OR report. It appears that little detail is presented to allow presented to allow the
    judgments about it. In addition,
    1 – 40 Points attempt has been made to the reader to understand reader to understand the
    applications of theory are included
    help the reader understand the content and make content and make
    to illuminate issues.
    the material. judgments about it. judgments about it.
    Readers gain insights.
    4-12 points 13-24 points 25-36 points
    37-40 points
    Resources not cited in Some resources are cited
    All resources are cited, but All resources are cited and appear
    paper or proper format not but not all. Not formatted
    formatting isn’t correct with correct formatting.
    Referencing (30%) used. correctly
    OR
    Turnitin Rating: 10% – 20% Turnitin Rating: <10.00%
    1 – 30 Points Turnitin Rating: >50.00% Turnitin Rating: 20% – 50%
    19-27 points 28-30 points
    3-9 points 10-18 points
    Information is presented in
    Details and examples are Information is scattered Information is logically effective order. Excellent structure
    Organization and Thought
    not organized, are hard to and needs further ordered with paragraphs of paragraphs and transitions
    Process (30%)
    follow and understand development and transitions. enhances readability and
    OR
    comprehension.
    1 – 30 Points
    3-9 points 10-18 points 19-27 points
    28-30 points
    NAMES

    SECTION
    ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT
    Rubrics

    Beginning Developing Exemplary


    Accomplished (Yes, but)
    Criteria (Weight) (No) (No, but) (Yes)
    61 – 90%
    10 – 30% 31 – 60% 91-100%
    An accurate and complete
    The explanation is An accurate and complete An accurate and complete
    explanation of key concepts and
    sufficiently inaccurate, explanation of key concepts explanation of key concepts
    theories is made, drawing on
    incomplete, or confusing and theories is made, and theories is made,
    relevant literature. Enough detail is
    that the reader gains little drawing on relevant drawing on relevant
    presented to allow the reader to
    Content quality (40%) information from the literature. Insufficient literature. Enough detail is
    understand the content and make
    OR report. It appears that little detail is presented to allow presented to allow the
    judgments about it. In addition,
    1 – 40 Points attempt has been made to the reader to understand reader to understand the
    applications of theory are included
    help the reader understand the content and make content and make
    to illuminate issues.
    the material. judgments about it. judgments about it.
    Readers gain insights.
    4-12 points 13-24 points 25-36 points
    37-40 points
    Resources not cited in Some resources are cited
    All resources are cited, but All resources are cited and appear
    paper or proper format not but not all. Not formatted
    formatting isn’t correct with correct formatting.
    Referencing (30%) used. correctly
    OR
    Turnitin Rating: 10% – 20% Turnitin Rating: <10.00%
    1 – 30 Points Turnitin Rating: >50.00% Turnitin Rating: 20% – 50%
    19-27 points 28-30 points
    3-9 points 10-18 points
    Information is presented in
    Details and examples are Information is scattered Information is logically effective order. Excellent structure
    Organization and Thought
    not organized, are hard to and needs further ordered with paragraphs of paragraphs and transitions
    Process (30%)
    follow and understand development and transitions. enhances readability and
    OR
    comprehension.
    1 – 30 Points
    3-9 points 10-18 points 19-27 points
    28-30 points
    NAMES

    SECTION
    ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT
    Rubrics

    Beginning Developing Exemplary


    Accomplished (Yes, but)
    Criteria (Weight) (No) (No, but) (Yes)
    61 – 90%
    10 – 30% 31 – 60% 91-100%
    An accurate and complete
    The explanation is An accurate and complete An accurate and complete
    explanation of key concepts and
    sufficiently inaccurate, explanation of key concepts explanation of key concepts
    theories is made, drawing on
    incomplete, or confusing and theories is made, and theories is made,
    relevant literature. Enough detail is
    that the reader gains little drawing on relevant drawing on relevant
    presented to allow the reader to
    Content quality (40%) information from the literature. Insufficient literature. Enough detail is
    understand the content and make
    OR report. It appears that little detail is presented to allow presented to allow the
    judgments about it. In addition,
    1 – 40 Points attempt has been made to the reader to understand reader to understand the
    applications of theory are included
    help the reader understand the content and make content and make
    to illuminate issues.
    the material. judgments about it. judgments about it.
    Readers gain insights.
    4-12 points 13-24 points 25-36 points
    37-40 points
    Resources not cited in Some resources are cited
    All resources are cited, but All resources are cited and appear
    paper or proper format not but not all. Not formatted
    formatting isn’t correct with correct formatting.
    Referencing (30%) used. correctly
    OR
    Turnitin Rating: 10% – 20% Turnitin Rating: <10.00%
    1 – 30 Points Turnitin Rating: >50.00% Turnitin Rating: 20% – 50%
    19-27 points 28-30 points
    3-9 points 10-18 points
    Information is presented in
    Details and examples are Information is scattered Information is logically effective order. Excellent structure
    Organization and Thought
    not organized, are hard to and needs further ordered with paragraphs of paragraphs and transitions
    Process (30%)
    follow and understand development and transitions. enhances readability and
    OR
    comprehension.
    1 – 30 Points
    3-9 points 10-18 points 19-27 points
    28-30 points
    NAMES

    SECTION
    ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT
    Rubrics

    Beginning Developing Exemplary


    Accomplished (Yes, but)
    Criteria (Weight) (No) (No, but) (Yes)
    61 – 90%
    10 – 30% 31 – 60% 91-100%
    An accurate and complete
    The explanation is An accurate and complete An accurate and complete
    explanation of key concepts and
    sufficiently inaccurate, explanation of key concepts explanation of key concepts
    theories is made, drawing on
    incomplete, or confusing and theories is made, and theories is made,
    relevant literature. Enough detail is
    that the reader gains little drawing on relevant drawing on relevant
    presented to allow the reader to
    Content quality (40%) information from the literature. Insufficient literature. Enough detail is
    understand the content and make
    OR report. It appears that little detail is presented to allow presented to allow the
    judgments about it. In addition,
    1 – 40 Points attempt has been made to the reader to understand reader to understand the
    applications of theory are included
    help the reader understand the content and make content and make
    to illuminate issues.
    the material. judgments about it. judgments about it.
    Readers gain insights.
    4-12 points 13-24 points 25-36 points
    37-40 points
    Resources not cited in Some resources are cited
    All resources are cited, but All resources are cited and appear
    paper or proper format not but not all. Not formatted
    formatting isn’t correct with correct formatting.
    Referencing (30%) used. correctly
    OR
    Turnitin Rating: 10% – 20% Turnitin Rating: <10.00%
    1 – 30 Points Turnitin Rating: >50.00% Turnitin Rating: 20% – 50%
    19-27 points 28-30 points
    3-9 points 10-18 points
    Information is presented in
    Details and examples are Information is scattered Information is logically effective order. Excellent structure
    Organization and Thought
    not organized, are hard to and needs further ordered with paragraphs of paragraphs and transitions
    Process (30%)
    follow and understand development and transitions. enhances readability and
    OR
    comprehension.
    1 – 30 Points
    3-9 points 10-18 points 19-27 points
    28-30 points
    NAMES

    SECTION
    ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT
    Rubrics

    Beginning Developing Exemplary


    Accomplished (Yes, but)
    Criteria (Weight) (No) (No, but) (Yes)
    61 – 90%
    10 – 30% 31 – 60% 91-100%
    An accurate and complete
    The explanation is An accurate and complete An accurate and complete
    explanation of key concepts and
    sufficiently inaccurate, explanation of key concepts explanation of key concepts
    theories is made, drawing on
    incomplete, or confusing and theories is made, and theories is made,
    relevant literature. Enough detail is
    that the reader gains little drawing on relevant drawing on relevant
    presented to allow the reader to
    Content quality (40%) information from the literature. Insufficient literature. Enough detail is
    understand the content and make
    OR report. It appears that little detail is presented to allow presented to allow the
    judgments about it. In addition,
    1 – 40 Points attempt has been made to the reader to understand reader to understand the
    applications of theory are included
    help the reader understand the content and make content and make
    to illuminate issues.
    the material. judgments about it. judgments about it.
    Readers gain insights.
    4-12 points 13-24 points 25-36 points
    37-40 points
    Resources not cited in Some resources are cited
    All resources are cited, but All resources are cited and appear
    paper or proper format not but not all. Not formatted
    formatting isn’t correct with correct formatting.
    Referencing (30%) used. correctly
    OR
    Turnitin Rating: 10% – 20% Turnitin Rating: <10.00%
    1 – 30 Points Turnitin Rating: >50.00% Turnitin Rating: 20% – 50%
    19-27 points 28-30 points
    3-9 points 10-18 points
    Information is presented in
    Details and examples are Information is scattered Information is logically effective order. Excellent structure
    Organization and Thought
    not organized, are hard to and needs further ordered with paragraphs of paragraphs and transitions
    Process (30%)
    follow and understand development and transitions. enhances readability and
    OR
    comprehension.
    1 – 30 Points
    3-9 points 10-18 points 19-27 points
    28-30 points
    NAMES

    SECTION
    ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT
    Rubrics

    Beginning Developing Exemplary


    Accomplished (Yes, but)
    Criteria (Weight) (No) (No, but) (Yes)
    61 – 90%
    10 – 30% 31 – 60% 91-100%
    An accurate and complete
    The explanation is An accurate and complete An accurate and complete
    explanation of key concepts and
    sufficiently inaccurate, explanation of key concepts explanation of key concepts
    theories is made, drawing on
    incomplete, or confusing and theories is made, and theories is made,
    relevant literature. Enough detail is
    that the reader gains little drawing on relevant drawing on relevant
    presented to allow the reader to
    Content quality (40%) information from the literature. Insufficient literature. Enough detail is
    understand the content and make
    OR report. It appears that little detail is presented to allow presented to allow the
    judgments about it. In addition,
    1 – 40 Points attempt has been made to the reader to understand reader to understand the
    applications of theory are included
    help the reader understand the content and make content and make
    to illuminate issues.
    the material. judgments about it. judgments about it.
    Readers gain insights.
    4-12 points 13-24 points 25-36 points
    37-40 points
    Resources not cited in Some resources are cited
    All resources are cited, but All resources are cited and appear
    paper or proper format not but not all. Not formatted
    formatting isn’t correct with correct formatting.
    Referencing (30%) used. correctly
    OR
    Turnitin Rating: 10% – 20% Turnitin Rating: <10.00%
    1 – 30 Points Turnitin Rating: >50.00% Turnitin Rating: 20% – 50%
    19-27 points 28-30 points
    3-9 points 10-18 points
    Information is presented in
    Details and examples are Information is scattered Information is logically effective order. Excellent structure
    Organization and Thought
    not organized, are hard to and needs further ordered with paragraphs of paragraphs and transitions
    Process (30%)
    follow and understand development and transitions. enhances readability and
    OR
    comprehension.
    1 – 30 Points
    3-9 points 10-18 points 19-27 points
    28-30 points
    NAMES

    SECTION
    ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT
    Rubrics

    Beginning Developing Exemplary


    Accomplished (Yes, but)
    Criteria (Weight) (No) (No, but) (Yes)
    61 – 90%
    10 – 30% 31 – 60% 91-100%
    An accurate and complete
    The explanation is An accurate and complete An accurate and complete
    explanation of key concepts and
    sufficiently inaccurate, explanation of key concepts explanation of key concepts
    theories is made, drawing on
    incomplete, or confusing and theories is made, and theories is made,
    relevant literature. Enough detail is
    that the reader gains little drawing on relevant drawing on relevant
    presented to allow the reader to
    Content quality (40%) information from the literature. Insufficient literature. Enough detail is
    understand the content and make
    OR report. It appears that little detail is presented to allow presented to allow the
    judgments about it. In addition,
    1 – 40 Points attempt has been made to the reader to understand reader to understand the
    applications of theory are included
    help the reader understand the content and make content and make
    to illuminate issues.
    the material. judgments about it. judgments about it.
    Readers gain insights.
    4-12 points 13-24 points 25-36 points
    37-40 points
    Resources not cited in Some resources are cited
    All resources are cited, but All resources are cited and appear
    paper or proper format not but not all. Not formatted
    formatting isn’t correct with correct formatting.
    Referencing (30%) used. correctly
    OR
    Turnitin Rating: 10% – 20% Turnitin Rating: <10.00%
    1 – 30 Points Turnitin Rating: >50.00% Turnitin Rating: 20% – 50%
    19-27 points 28-30 points
    3-9 points 10-18 points
    Information is presented in
    Details and examples are Information is scattered Information is logically effective order. Excellent structure
    Organization and Thought
    not organized, are hard to and needs further ordered with paragraphs of paragraphs and transitions
    Process (30%)
    follow and understand development and transitions. enhances readability and
    OR
    comprehension.
    1 – 30 Points
    3-9 points 10-18 points 19-27 points
    28-30 points
    NAMES

    SECTION
    ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT
    Rubrics

    Beginning Developing Exemplary


    Accomplished (Yes, but)
    Criteria (Weight) (No) (No, but) (Yes)
    61 – 90%
    10 – 30% 31 – 60% 91-100%
    An accurate and complete
    The explanation is An accurate and complete An accurate and complete
    explanation of key concepts and
    sufficiently inaccurate, explanation of key concepts explanation of key concepts
    theories is made, drawing on
    incomplete, or confusing and theories is made, and theories is made,
    relevant literature. Enough detail is
    that the reader gains little drawing on relevant drawing on relevant
    presented to allow the reader to
    Content quality (40%) information from the literature. Insufficient literature. Enough detail is
    understand the content and make
    OR report. It appears that little detail is presented to allow presented to allow the
    judgments about it. In addition,
    1 – 40 Points attempt has been made to the reader to understand reader to understand the
    applications of theory are included
    help the reader understand the content and make content and make
    to illuminate issues.
    the material. judgments about it. judgments about it.
    Readers gain insights.
    4-12 points 13-24 points 25-36 points
    37-40 points
    Resources not cited in Some resources are cited
    All resources are cited, but All resources are cited and appear
    paper or proper format not but not all. Not formatted
    formatting isn’t correct with correct formatting.
    Referencing (30%) used. correctly
    OR
    Turnitin Rating: 10% – 20% Turnitin Rating: <10.00%
    1 – 30 Points Turnitin Rating: >50.00% Turnitin Rating: 20% – 50%
    19-27 points 28-30 points
    3-9 points 10-18 points
    Information is presented in
    Details and examples are Information is scattered Information is logically effective order. Excellent structure
    Organization and Thought
    not organized, are hard to and needs further ordered with paragraphs of paragraphs and transitions
    Process (30%)
    follow and understand development and transitions. enhances readability and
    OR
    comprehension.
    1 – 30 Points
    3-9 points 10-18 points 19-27 points
    28-30 points
    NAMES

    SECTION
    ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT
    Rubrics

    Beginning Developing Exemplary


    Accomplished (Yes, but)
    Criteria (Weight) (No) (No, but) (Yes)
    61 – 90%
    10 – 30% 31 – 60% 91-100%
    An accurate and complete
    The explanation is An accurate and complete An accurate and complete
    explanation of key concepts and
    sufficiently inaccurate, explanation of key concepts explanation of key concepts
    theories is made, drawing on
    incomplete, or confusing and theories is made, and theories is made,
    relevant literature. Enough detail is
    that the reader gains little drawing on relevant drawing on relevant
    presented to allow the reader to
    Content quality (40%) information from the literature. Insufficient literature. Enough detail is
    understand the content and make
    OR report. It appears that little detail is presented to allow presented to allow the
    judgments about it. In addition,
    1 – 40 Points attempt has been made to the reader to understand reader to understand the
    applications of theory are included
    help the reader understand the content and make content and make
    to illuminate issues.
    the material. judgments about it. judgments about it.
    Readers gain insights.
    4-12 points 13-24 points 25-36 points
    37-40 points
    Resources not cited in Some resources are cited
    All resources are cited, but All resources are cited and appear
    paper or proper format not but not all. Not formatted
    formatting isn’t correct with correct formatting.
    Referencing (30%) used. correctly
    OR
    Turnitin Rating: 10% – 20% Turnitin Rating: <10.00%
    1 – 30 Points Turnitin Rating: >50.00% Turnitin Rating: 20% – 50%
    19-27 points 28-30 points
    3-9 points 10-18 points
    Information is presented in
    Details and examples are Information is scattered Information is logically effective order. Excellent structure
    Organization and Thought
    not organized, are hard to and needs further ordered with paragraphs of paragraphs and transitions
    Process (30%)
    follow and understand development and transitions. enhances readability and
    OR
    comprehension.
    1 – 30 Points
    3-9 points 10-18 points 19-27 points
    28-30 points
    NAMES

    SECTION

    You might also like