Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Frankenstein Essay
Frankenstein Essay
English 12 Grade
December 4, 2023
Abstract
Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is a classic novel, a profound narrative that explores the
complex themes of creation, responsibility, and the consequences of human actions. The novel
tells the story of Victor Frankenstein, a young scientist who creates a living creature from dead
body parts but abandons it in horror and disgust. The creature, who is never given a name,
suffers from loneliness, rejection, violence and seeks revenge on his creator and his family.
Thesis Statement
The novel underscores the theme and important questions critical about the relationship
between creators and their creations, drawing parallels with the Biblical worldview, and whether
they have the moral obligation to accept them, no matter how they are. Frankenstein’s
relationship with the monster reflects a biblical worldview on creation, and that Frankenstein
fails to fulfill his duty as a creator and a steward of God’s creation. This affirms that God is the
Creator of all life, and that humans are created in His image and have a special relationship with
Him.
Literature Review
Frankenstein's Relationship with the Monster
Victor Frankenstein's creation of the monster was motivated by his ambition to conquer
death and create life. He was shocked and disgusted by the appearance of his creation and fled
from it, leaving it alone and confused. He does not take responsibility for his actions and tries to
forget about his creature, hoping that it will die or disappear. This initial rejection sets the tone
for their relationship, as the monster expresses profound loneliness and seeks understanding and
friendship from its creator. He does not realize that his creature has emotions, intelligence, and a
desire for companionship, and at the same time, it suffers from isolation and hostility towards the
world, which leads to resentment and revenge within it. The relationship between Frankenstein
and the monster is characterized by a lack of empathy and understanding. Frankenstein is always
full of fear, regret, and avoidance; on the other hand, the monster has a complex and sympathetic
character, despite his hideous appearance and violent actions (Shelly, 1986, p. 12). The creature
was initially innocent and benevolent; learning about the world through observation and reading,
he yearned for love and acceptance and tried to make friends but was rejected by them and even
attacked. labour. Filled with sadness and anger, he decided to make Frankenstein suffer as he had
suffered and killed Frankenstein's loved ones. The monster desires companionship, knowledge,
and happiness. It also has a conscience, which makes it feel remorseful and guilty about its
crimes. It is not a monster per se, but due to circumstances, it is not the product of natural
selection but the product of unnatural creation, not the result of God's will but Frankenstein's
madness. Despite being the creator, Frankenstein abandons his creation in horror and disgust,
failing to provide the guidance and acceptance that the creature craves (Shelley, 1818). This
abandonment results in the creature falling into violence and despair, highlighting the
consequences of Frankenstein's irresponsibility. This sets the stage for a deeper exploration of
2
the theme of how the generators treat their creations and counter-moral accusations of similar
treatment.
The treatment of Frankenstein's monster brings up the theme of how creators often
neglect their creations, especially when they fail to meet their expectations. This theme is not
limited to Frankenstein but also reflects society's tendency to shun what is considered 'different'
ethical questions about generators' legal responsibility for their creations. Many chapters
highlight the consequences of neglect, rejection, and abuse, as the monster's suffering and
eventual descent into violence and despair can be attributed to Frankenstein's failure to take
responsibility for his creation. The theme of how creators treat their creations shows the contrast
between Frankenstein and God, the Creator of humanity. Frankenstein treats his creation with
indifference, contempt, and fear and fails to fulfill his duties as creator. He does not give his
creature a name, a family, or a purpose, and he does not care about his happiness or welfare. He
does not respect the rights, feelings, or needs of his creatures and does not repent for his mistakes
or try to make amends. He sees his creature as a mistake, a burden, and an enemy, and he wishes
to destroy him. He does not recognize his creature as a fellow human being who shares his nature
and image. A monster, like a human, is a creature created in the image of its creator, sharing
some traits and abilities with its creator. However, unlike humans, the monster was not created in
the image of God but in the image of a fallen and sinful human being, treated as an object and an
experiment. The monster is not loved; it is shunned and isolated, hated, and filled with fear. It
was not well treated, but cursed and persecuted. It is not guided but creates its own impulse,
3
learning through observation and its own experiences. Frankenstein holds immense power as the
creator of the monster; however, he does not apply this power responsibly, leading to disastrous
consequences for both him and his creation. This theme serves as an exemplary story about the
moral accusations against creation and the importance of empathy, compassion, and
The novel raises the question of whether generators have an obligation to accept their
creations, whatever their nature. Frankenstein's rejection of the monster and refusal to take
responsibility for his behavior emphasize the potential consequences of refusing to accept one's
creation. The monster's plea for understanding and love is attributed by Frankenstein to the dead;
he does not see any value or goodness in his creature and does not try to understand or help him.
His failure to meet this need leads Frankenstein to avoid this responsibility and perpetuate the
cycle of suffering and despair that ultimately engulfs both himself and his creation. From an
ethical standpoint, it is assumed that creators have a moral obligation to accept their creations
since they are responsible for making them a reality. This acceptance requires recognizing the
humanity and essential value of creation, regardless of its form or nature. As between humans
and God, the story emphasizes the importance of responsibility in the act of creation, implying
that creators have an inherent obligation to accept and nurture their creations, regardless of their
nature. What are their qualities? Frankenstein does not love his creature and does not seek his
forgiveness or reconciliation. He does not acknowledge his creature as his child, relative, or
friend. Yet the monster accepts his creator, no matter what he is, and seeks his acceptance in
return. He does not hate his creator, but he loves and respects him. He does not blame his creator
4
for his appearance, but for his indifference and cruelty. He does not want to harm his creator, but
he wants to please him and be with him. He does not seek the destruction of his creator, but
compassion and justice. He seeks the forgiveness and reconciliation of his creator and
acknowledges him as his father, his creator, and his judge (Shelly, 1818, Ch. 15–16, 24).
Likewise, humans do not accept their Creator, whatever He is, and reject Him because of their
sin and pride. They do not see any value or goodness in God and do not try to understand or obey
Him. They do not love God and do not seek His forgiveness or reconciliation. They do not
acknowledge God as their Father, Lord, and Savior. However, God accepts His creations,
whatever they are, and seeks their acceptance in return. He does not hate his creations but loves
and cares for them. He does not blame His creations for their sins, but for their unbelief and
rebellion. God wants to bless people and be with them; He does not want to harm anyone; He
does not want to destroy His creatures but seeks their salvation and restoration. God seeks
forgiveness and reconciliation for his creation and acknowledges them as his children, his
Frankenstein's relationship with the monster can be seen as a distorted reflection of the
biblical worldview of creation. Frankenstein, like God, is a creator who brings life from nothing
using his knowledge and scientific skills. However, unlike God, Frankenstein does not create out
of love but out of pride and curiosity. He did not acknowledge God as the ultimate source of life
but sought to usurp His role and become a god himself. He has no regard for his creation but
dismisses it as a hideous mistake. He does not establish a relationship with his creation but
abandons it to fend for himself in a hostile world. He does not take responsibility for his actions
5
but blames the creature for the crime he committed. He does not seek to redeem his creation but
to destroy it. On the other hand, God treats His creation with love, wisdom, and grace and fulfills
His role as Creator. He gives His creatures names, families, and purposes and is concerned for
their well-being and happiness. He respects their rights, feelings, and needs and provides for
them. He sees His creatures as good, valuable, and beloved and desires to save them. He
recognizes His creatures as His children, bearers of His nature and image. He also takes
responsibility for His actions and does not abandon His creatures, even when they sin and rebel
against Him. He sent His Son, Jesus Christ, to die for their sins and restore their relationship with
Him. He also promised to create new heavens and a new earth, where there would be no more
pain, sorrow, or death. (Holy Bible, Revelation 21:4) According to the biblical worldview, God
created humans in His image, gave them unique dignity and worth, and charged them with the
responsibility of caring for and ruling over the rest of the world. creation (Holy Bible, Genesis
1:26-28) God also established a covenant relationship with humans, promising to bless them and
become their God (Holy Bible, Genesis 2:15–17). However, humans rebelled against God and
disobeyed His commands, bringing sin and death into the world (Holy Bible, Genesis 3). As a
result, creation became useless and corrupt, and humans became alienated from God, each other,
and the rest of creation (Holy Bible, Romans 8:20–21; Genesis 3:16-24). However, God did not
abandon His creation but initiated a plan of redemption through His Son, Jesus Christ, who came
to restore the broken relationship between God and humanity and to renew the whole creation
(Holy Bible, John 3:16; Col 1:15–20). God also calls His people to participate in His work of
redemption by living as image-bearers of Him, loving Him and their neighbors, and stewarding
His creation (Holy Bible, Matthew 22:37–40, Genesis 2:15). This literary work connects to a
biblical worldview that affirms that God is the Creator of all life and that humans are created in
6
His image and have a special relationship with Him. The novel also shows the consequences of
violating this worldview and the need for redemption and rehabilitation. The novel warns of the
dangers of playing God and the responsibilities of being human. The novel also invites readers to
reflect on their own relationship with God and with His creation and to choose between love and
hate, life and death, grace, and judgment. The novel thus shows the tragic consequences of
Frankenstein usurps God's power and challenges His design. In abandoning the monster,
Frankenstein neglects his duty. In short, Frankenstein cannot become the creator and steward of
God's creation and must suffer the consequences of his sin, giving rise to the contrast between
Frankenstein's relationship with the monster and God's relationship with humans. In the book of
Genesis, the story of God's creation of humanity establishes a foundational framework for
understanding the responsibility of creators for their creation. God's objections to the virtue of
His creation and His commitment to care for and nurture humanity illustrate the ideal
relationship between creator and creation. The themes of the connection between the creator and
creation and the creator's obligation to accept their creations reflect biblical principles and
stories.
creatures, indeed in the face of error or rebellion. By drawing on these biblical parallels,
Shelley's examination of the connections between the creator and creation invites summaries to
consider the moral and spiritual limits of how they treat others, as well as counteraccusations of
7
Works Cited
Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein, or the Modern Prometheus. Lit2Go Edition. 1818. Web.
https://etc.usf.edu/lit2go/128/frankenstein-or-the-modern-prometheus/2305/chapter-15/.