Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Financial Accounting 8Th Edition Craig Deegan Online Ebook Texxtbook Full Chapter PDF
Financial Accounting 8Th Edition Craig Deegan Online Ebook Texxtbook Full Chapter PDF
Deegan
Visit to download the full and correct content document:
https://ebookmeta.com/product/financial-accounting-8th-edition-craig-deegan/
More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant
download maybe you interests ...
https://ebookmeta.com/product/financial-accounting-theory-5e-5th-
edition-craig-deegan/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/financial-and-management-
accounting-8th-edition-weetman/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/financial-accounting-robert-libby/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/financial-accounting-10th-edition-
libby/
Financial Accounting Jerry J. Weygandt
https://ebookmeta.com/product/financial-accounting-jerry-j-
weygandt/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/financial-accounting-tenth-edition-
john-medlin/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/financial-accounting-10th-edition-
john-hoggett/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/financial-accounting-11e-ise-
robert-libby/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/principles-of-accounting-
volume-1-financial-accounting-1st-edition-mitchell-franklin/
Craig Deegan’s Financial Accounting 8e continues to be the market-leading and most
Financial Accounting
highly regarded product for the changing needs of today’s instructors and students.
New to this edition:
• Digital resources: for the first time, Financial Accounting offers a complete digital
package, including LearnSmart and SmartBook, which provide an adaptive and
individualised learning experience unique to each student
Connect is proven to deliver better results for you. Proven content integrates seamlessly
with enhanced digital tools to create a personalised learning experience that provides you with
precisely what you need, when you need it.
Ensure maximum learning impact with SmartBook, the first and only adaptive reading
experience designed to change the way you read and learn. It creates a personalised reading
experience by highlighting the most impactful concepts you need to learn at that moment in time.
,6%1
DEEGAN
www.mhhe.com/au/deegan8e
Every effort has been made to trace and acknowledge copyrighted material. The authors and publishers
tender their apologies should any infringement have occurred.
Enquiries should be made to the publisher via www.mheducation.com.au or marked for the attention of
the permissions editor at the address below.
Published in Australia by
McGraw-Hill Education (Australia) Pty Ltd
Level 2, 82 Waterloo Road, North Ryde NSW 2113
Product managers: Lisa Coady and Robert Ashworth
Product developer: Cynthia Morali
Research coordinator: Carolina Bodin
Content producer: Genevieve MacDermott
Permissions editor: Haidi Bernhardt
Copyeditor: Alison Moore
Indexer: Shelley Barons
Cover design: Jane Cameron
Typeset in Proxima Nova Light 10/13.5pt by SPi Global, India
Printed in China on 65gsm matt art by 1010 Printing Int. Ltd
Craig Deegan
vi Contents in brief
ONLINE CHAPTERS
Chapter 31 Further consolidation issues III: accounting for indirect ownership interests
Chapter 32 Accounting for investments in associates and joint ventures
Introduction to accounting for depreciation of property, plant and equipment 181 Learning objectives 180
Depreciable amount (base) of an asset 182 Summary 195
Determination of useful life 183 Key terms 196
Method of cost apportionment 184 End-of-chapter exercises 196
Depreciation of separate components 187 Review questions 196
When to start depreciating an asset 188 Challenging questions 198
Revision of depreciation rate and depreciation method 188
Land and buildings 189
Modifying existing non-current assets 191
Disposition of a depreciable asset 191
Depreciation as a process of allocating the cost of an asset over its useful life:
further considerations 193
Disclosure requirements 194
CONTENTS IN FULL ix
Introduction to revaluations and impairment testing of non-current assets 203 Learning objectives 202
Measuring property, plant and equipment at cost or at fair value—the choice 203 Summary 227
The use of fair values 204 Key terms 228
Revaluation increments 205 End-of-chapter exercises 228
Treatment of balances of accumulated depreciation upon revaluation 206 Review questions 229
Revaluation decrements 209 Challenging questions 231
Reversal of revaluation decrements and increments 210 References 233
Accounting for the gain or loss on the disposal or derecognition of a revalued
non-current asset 212
Recognition of impairment losses 216
Further consideration of present values 221
Offsetting revaluation increments and decrements 223
Investment properties 223
Economic consequences of asset revaluations 224
Disclosure requirements 226
Introduction to accounting for heritage assets and biological assets 301 Learning objectives 300
Accounting for heritage assets 301 Summary 336
Accounting for biological assets 320 Key terms 337
End-of-chapter exercises 337
Review questions 337
Challenging questions 338
References 341
x CONTENTS IN FULL
Introduction to accounting for share capital and reserves 458 Learning objectives 457
Different classes of shares 459 Summary 476
Accounting for the issue of share capital 460 Key terms 476
Accounting for distributions 467 End-of-chapter exercises 477
Redemption of preference shares 468 Review questions 478
Forfeited shares 470 Challenging questions 480
Share splits and bonus issues 472 References 480
Rights issues and share options 473
Required disclosures for share capital 475
Reserves 475
CONTENTS IN FULL xi
Introduction to the statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income 586 Learning objectives 585
Profit or loss disclosure 589 Summary 617
Statement of changes in equity 603 Key terms 618
Prior period errors 604 End-of-chapter exercises 618
Changes in accounting policy 607 Review questions 618
Profit as a guide to an organisation’s success 613 Challenging questions 620
Future changes in the requirements pertaining to how we present References 624
information about comprehensive income 615
Overview of accounting for exploration and evaluation expenditures under AASB 6 743 Learning objectives 742
Extractive industries defined 744 Summary 772
Alternative methods to account for preproduction costs 745 Key terms 773
Abandoning an area of interest 748 End-of-chapter exercises 773
Accumulation of costs pertaining to exploration and evaluation activities 748 Review questions 773
Basis for measurement of exploration and evaluation expenditures 749 Challenging questions 775
Impairment and amortisation of costs carried forward 750 References 776
Restoration costs 752
Sales revenue 754
Inventory 755
Disclosure requirements 755
Does the area-of-interest method provide a realistic value for an entity’s reserves? 764
Research on accounting regulation pertaining to pre-production expenditures 764
Other developments in extractive industry reporting 767
The development of a new accounting standard for extractive activities 769
What is an ‘event after the reporting period’? 781 Learning objectives 780
Types of events after the reporting period 782 Summary 789
Disclosure requirements 787 Key terms 789
End-of-chapter exercises 789
Review questions 789
Challenging questions 790
CONTENTS IN FULL xiii
CHAPTER 27 FURTHER CONSOLIDATION ISSUES II: ACCOUNTING FOR NON-CONTROLLING INTERESTS 966
Introduction to accounting for foreign currency transactions 1009 Learning objectives 1008
Foreign currency transactions 1009 Summary 1020
Determination of functional currency and presentation currency 1013 Key terms 1021
Longer-term receivables and payables 1014 End-of-chapter exercises 1021
Translation of other monetary assets such as cash deposits 1015 Review questions 1022
Qualifying assets 1016 Challenging questions 1025
Hedging transactions 1018
Foreign currency swaps 1019
Introduction to translating the financial statements of foreign operations 1029 Learning objectives 1028
Reporting foreign currency transactions in the functional currency 1029 Summary 1043
Translating the accounts of foreign operations into the presentation currency 1036 Key terms 1043
Consolidation subsequent to translation 1041 End-of-chapter exercises 1043
Review questions 1045
Challenging questions 1045
CONTENTS IN FULL xv
ONLINE CHAPTERS
CHAPTER 31 FURTHER CONSOLIDATION ISSUES III: ACCOUNTING FOR INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTS
CHAPTER 32 ACCOUNTING FOR INVESTMENTS IN ASSOCIATES AND JOINT VENTURES
Appendix A 1122
Appendix B 1124
Appendix C 1126
Glossary1128
Index1137
This is the eighth edition of a book that was originally research studies that consider the merit, implications, and
published in 1995. Since the first edition of this book was costs and benefits of the various accounting requirements.
published we have seen extensive changes in relation to Also, various newspaper articles discussing different
the practice and regulation of general purpose financial aspects of the accounting requirements are reproduced
reporting. These changes continue to occur and this book for consideration and discussion. The permission of
has always attempted to carefully explain the nature of copyright holders to reproduce this material is gratefully
the changes as well as the potential economic and social acknowledged.
consequences which might result from such changes. Social-responsibility reporting continues to be an
In the period of time between when the seventh important area of accounting, and one that is rapidly
edition of this book was published, and the writing of this developing. Its importance is further highlighted by the
eighth edition was completed (writing was completed in growing evidence of climate change, species extinction,
March 2016) there have been some rather significant and large scale poverty, hunger and social inequities in
changes in regulation and guidance pertaining to external many countries. While this book predominantly considers
reporting. These changes have been incorporated financial accounting and reporting, Chapter 30 focuses
within this eighth edition and some of the major changes on social-responsibility reporting and provides the most
we cover relate to such areas as financial statement up-to-date and comprehensive material available on this
presentation, The Conceptual Framework for Financial important topic with additional material being added on
Reporting, accounting for leases, revenue recognition, the important topic of Climate Change—both from an
financial instruments, and corporate social-responsibility accounting and scientific perspective—as well as the
reporting. Because many of these changes are significant inclusion of commentaries on various alternative reporting
we will provide critical comparisons of the ‘old’ and ‘new’ frameworks.
requirements. Writing a text like this is an extremely time-consuming
Each chapter of this eighth edition contains learning exercise and it has been very gratifying that the effort
objectives, chapter summaries and a comprehensive end- involved has been rewarded by so many institutions
of-chapter exercise. A glossary of key terms is provided across Australia (and also some outside Australia) electing
towards the back of the book. The book provides material to prescribe previous editions of this book as part of their
that will enable the reader to gain a thorough grasp of the accounting programs. Given the success of all previous
contents and of the practical application of the majority editions, every effort has been made to ensure that this
of financial accounting requirements currently in place eighth edition is equally valuable to students and teachers,
in Australia. In the discussion of these requirements, and that it has been substantially and thoroughly revised.
numerous worked examples, with detailed solutions, are
provided throughout the text.
As well as addressing how to apply the various
accounting requirements, this text also encourages
readers to critically evaluate the various rules and
guidelines. The aim is to develop accountants who are
not only able to apply particular accounting requirements,
but who will also be able to contribute to the ongoing
improvement of accounting requirements. The view taken
is that it is not only important for students to understand
the rules of financial accounting, but also to understand
the limitations inherent in many of the existing accounting
requirements. For this reason, reference is made to various
Preface xvii
There are many people who must be thanked for their Wales; Lee Moermon, University of Wollongong; Gary
contribution to the eighth edition of this book. First, our Monroe, Australian National University; Richard Morris,
thanks to the following reviewers of the current edition: University of New South Wales; Anja Morton, Southern
Cross University, Lismore campus; Karen Ness, James
Bobae Choi, University of Newcastle; Sally Chaplin, Cook University; Cameron Nichol, RMIT University; Gary
Queensland University of Technology; Victoria Clout, Plugarth, University of New South Wales; Lisa Powell,
University of New South Wales; Sajan Cyril, Australian University of South Australia; Jim Psaros, University of
Catholic University; Colin Dolley, Edith Cowan University; Newcastle; Michaela Rankin, Monash University; Andrew
Peter Dryden, Federation University; Hermann Frick, Read, University of Canberra; Kathy Rudkin, University
University of Queensland; Syed Haider, Victoria of Wollongong; Dan Scheiwe, Queensland University
University; Andrew Jackson, University of New South of Technology; Mark Silvester, University of Southern
Wales; Arifur Khan, Deakin University; Eric Lee, Monash Queensland; Stella Sofocleous, Victoria University of
University; Janet Lee, Australian National University; Technology; Jenny Stewart, Griffith University; Seng
Jinghui Liu, Southern Cross University; Tracey McDowall, The, Australian National University; Len Therry, Edith
Deakin University; Balachandran Muniandy, La Trobe Cowan University; Matthew Tilling, University of Western
University; Puspalila Muniandy, Deakin University; Australia; Irene Tutticci, University of Queensland; Mark
Gregory Phillip, University of Newcastle; Pranil Prasad, Vallely, University of Southern Queensland; Trevor
University of the South Pacific; Maria Prokofieva, Victoria Wilmshurst, University of Tasmania; Victoria Wise,
University; Glenn Rechtschaffen, University of Auckland; University of Tasmania; Ann-Marie Wyatt, University of
Natasja Steenkamp, Central Queensland University; Technology Sydney.
Grantley Taylor, Curtin University; Suzanne Mary Taylor,
QUT Business School; Maria Tyler, CQUniversity Mackay Thanks also go to many of my colleagues at RMIT
campus; Effiezal Aswadi Abdul Wahab, Curtin University. University for their friendship and encouragement. The team
at McGraw-Hill Education (Australia) also deserve a great
This book has also been improved during the course of deal of thanks for helping in the preparation of this book.
the first seven editions by the feedback received from many Lastly, but certainly not leastly, thanks again go to my
people and I would like to acknowledge the contribution that 16-year-old daughter Cassandra for all the love and support
they have previously made. These people include: she gives me in whatever I seem to be doing and for
Maria Balatbat, University of New South Wales; Peter continually helping me to put everything into perspective. As
Baxter, University of the Sunshine Coast; Poonam Bir, I have said before, she is indeed my finest work (and my most
Monash University; Phil Cobbin, University of Melbourne; valuable ‘asset’) and represents that aspect of my life of which
Lome Cummings, Macquarie University; Matt Dyki, Charles I am most proud.
Sturt University, Wagga Wagga campus; Natalie Gallery,
Queensland University of Technology; John Goodwin,
RMIT University; Deborah Janke, University of Southern
Queensland; Maurice Jenner, University of Southern
Queensland; Graham Jones, Flinders University; Peter
Keet, RMIT University; Janet Lee, Australian National
University; Steven Lesser, Charles Sturt University,
Wagga Wagga campus; Stephen Lim, University of
Technology Sydney; Janice Loftus, University of Sydney; The publisher would also like to thank the following
Wei Lu, Monash University; Diane Mayorga, University digital contributors: Victoria Clout, Parmod Chand, Maria
of New South Wales; Kellie McCombie, University of Prokofieva, Jackie Liu, Maria Balatbat, Eric Lee and
Wollongong; Malcolm Miller, University of New South Matt Dyki.
xviii Acknowledgments
McGraw-Hill Education is a proud corporate member of AACSB1 International. Understanding the importance and value
of AACSB accreditation, Financial Accounting has sought to recognise the curricula guidelines detailed in the AACSB
standards for business accreditation by connecting content and exercises to the general knowledge and skill guidelines
found in the AACSB standards.
The statements contained in Financial Accounting and in its digital resources are provided only as a guide for the
users of this text. The AACSB leaves content coverage and assessment within the purview of individual institutions,
the mission of the institutions, and the faculty. While Financial Accounting and the teaching package make no claim of
any specific AACSB qualification or evaluation, we have, within Financial Accounting identified chapters as containing
content and labelled activities according to the general knowledge and skills areas.2
1
The Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business [http://www.aacsb.edu/accreditation/standards.asp]
2
AACSB International 2008, ‘Eligibility procedures and accreditation standards for business accreditation’, www.aacsb.edu
AACSB statement xix
objectives. Theserequirements
6.13 Know the disclosure flag what youtoshould
pertaining know
asset revaluation and when
impairmentyoulosses.have
with relatively new leases. According to a report by Morgan Stanley, the impact on retailers will be ‘considerable’,
blowing out gearing levels and reducing return on capital employed, but will vary from retailer to retailer.
worked through the chapter. Make these the foundation for Reactions to the proposed rules include a report by Morgan Stanley predicting a considerable but varied impact
on retailers including reduced capital return and a blow out of gearing levels. The report says Myer, Specialty
your exam revision by using them to test yourself. The end-of- Fashion and The Reject Shop will be more affected than Kathmandu and Fantastic Furniture as the former have
significant and long-term lease liabilities. Also new retailers like Lovisa, who are early into lease terms will probably
chapter assignments also link back to these learning objectives.
202 PART 3: ACCOUNTING FOR ASSETS
be impacted more than established leaseholder retailers.
Morgan Stanley analyst Tom Kierath says investors aren’t as aware of the change to lease accounting rules as
they should be.
We would then debit the machine account by $5 000 and credit the revaluation surplus by $5 000. This would cause
Chapter introduction
the carrying amount of the asset to be $14 000, which is its fair value. That is, the journal entry would be:
Examples of the financial impact on Myer, Woolworths and Wesfarmers of the new rules clarify their expected
effect.
Myer: net debt $340 million but net present value (NPV) of lease liabilities is $2.2 billion. Debt would rise to
Each chapter begins with an excellent5 000 overview of the material
dee64022_ch06_202-233.indd 202 05/10/16 01:26 PM
WORKED EXAMPLE 6.1: Revaluation of a depreciable asset using the net-amount method aSOURCE:
wider grasp
Adapted of accounting
from ‘Retailers
23 April 2015, p. 21
byaccounting
face hit from proposed lease presenting opposing
changes’, by Sue viewpoints
Mitchell, The Australian Financial Review,
Assume that, as at 1 July 2018, Farrelly Ltd has an item of machinery that originally cost $40 000 and has accumulated in relation to hot topics. Some show accounting in a historical
depreciation of $15 000. Its remaining life is assessed to be five years, after which time it will have no residual value.
While completing a regular revaluation of all machinery, Farrelly decided on 1 July 2018 that the item should be
context; others relate to contemporary issues.
revalued to its current fair value, which was assessed as $45 000. 382 PART 4: ACCOUNTING FOR LIABILITIES AND OWNERS’ EQUITY
REQUIRED
Provide the appropriate journal entries to account for the revaluation using the net-amount method.
Figures
SOLUTION Figures provide a graphical representation of how events
dee64022_ch11_376-426.indd 382 05/12/16 06:57 AM
The total revaluation increment will represent the difference between the carrying amount and the fair value of the
asset at the date of the revaluation. In this case it would be:
and actions link.
$45 000 - ($40 000 - $15 000) = $20 000
The appropriate journal entries on 1 July 2018 would be:
According to AASB 116, future depreciation should be based on the revalued amount of the asset. The depreciation
charge for the year to 30 June 2019 would be $9 000 (the new carrying amount of $45 000 divided by the remaining
Worked examples
useful life of five years). Where the depreciation charges for any financial period have changed materially owing to a
revaluation, the financial effect of the change (that is, the increase or decrease in the depreciation charges) should
Abewide range of detailed scenarios and solutions, some
disclosed in the notes to the financial statements for that financial period.
KEY TERMS
Mr Anderson informs you that the directors intend to revalue the property, plant and equipment during the year. The
company has not revalued any assets in the past.
These features contain extracts from actual company reports or 1. What effect will an asset revaluation have on subsequent periods’ $ profits? Explain your answer. LO 6.10
2. Residential
Explain the land,
difference in the accounting treatment for 1 revaluation
000 000 increments and revaluation decrements. Do you
documents, or provide a commonly used format for accounting. considerland,
Factory that at
this
at cost
difference
valuation is ‘conceptually sound’? LO900
2016 6.6000
SUMMARY
They highlight the relevance of the chapter content to the 3. Buildings,
When should a revaluation
at valuation 2016increment be included as part profit or loss? LO 6.6, 6.8
of000
800
4. Accumulated
For the purposes (100 000) amount’ determined? LO 6.5
of AASB 116 or AASB 136, how is ‘recoverable
depreciation
practice
The of accounting,
chapter addressed provide
the topic of accounting another
for inventory. Inventory element
is defined tofor the
as assets held topics
sale in the ordinary
course of business, in the process of production for sale, or to be used in the production of goods; and other property
5. When would you determine the recoverable amount for a cash-generating unit rather than for an individual item of
property, plant2018,
At 30 June the balanceLO
and equipment? of6.11
the revaluation surplus is $400 000, of which $300 000 relates to the factory
covered
or and
services for sale, help
including to reinforce
consumable learning.
stores and supplies. land and $100 000 to the buildings. On this same date, independent valuations of the land and building are
CHAPTER 6: REVALUATIONS AND IMPAIRMENT TESTING OF NON-CURRENT ASSETS 229
obtained. In relation to the above assets, the assessed fair values at 30 June 2018 are:
CHAPTER 7: INVENTORY 251
Key points of the chapter are summarised in this section. Check These questions ask you to reflect on key topics within the
Factory land, previously
dee64022_ch06_202-233.indd
229
revalued in 2016
Buildings, previously revalued in 2016
700 000
900 000
05/10/16 01:26 PM
REQUIRED
Assuming asset revaluations were undertaken for the land in both 2017 and 2019, provide the journal entries for
both years. LO 6.3, 6.8
Challenging questions
These questions require a detailed problem analysis and help
dee64022_ch06_202-233.indd 231 05/10/16 01:26 PM
LearnSmart Advantage is a series of adaptive learning products fuelled by LearnSmart—the most widely used
and adaptive learning resource proven to strengthen memory recall, increase retention and boost grades.
Adaptive learning
No two students are the same, so why should their learning
experience be? Adaptive technology uses continual
assessment and artificial intelligence to personalise the
learning experience for each individual student. As the global
leader in adaptive and personalised learning technologies,
McGraw-Hill Education is pioneering ways to improve results
and retention across all disciplines.
SmartBook
Fuelled by LearnSmart, SmartBook is the first and only
adaptive reading experience available today. Starting with an
initial preview of each chapter and key learning objectives,
students read material and are guided to the topics they most
need to practise at that time, based on their responses to a
continuously adapting diagnostic. To ensure concept mastery
and retention, reading and practice continue until SmartBook
directs students to recharge and review important material
they are most likely to forget.
LearnSmart
LearnSmart maximises learning productivity and efficiency by
identifying the most important learning objectives for each student
to master at a given point in time. It knows when students are
likely to forget specific information and revisits that content to
advance knowledge from their short-term to long-term memory.
LearnSmart is proven to improve academic performance, ensuring
higher retention rates and better grades.
Proven effective
With Connect, you can complete your coursework anytime, anywhere.
Millions of students have used Connect and the results are in: research
shows that studying with McGraw-Hill Connect will increase the
likelihood that you’ll pass your course and get a better grade.
Connect support
Connect includes animated tutorials, videos and additional
embedded hints within specific questions to help you succeed.
The Connect Success Academy for Students is where you’ll find
tutorials on getting started, your study resources and completing
assignments in Connect. Everything you need to know about
Connect is here!
Visual progress
Connect provides you with reports to help you identify what you
should study and when your next assignment is due, and tracks your
performance. Connect’s Overall Performance report allows you to
see all of your assignment attempts, your score on each attempt, the
date you started and submitted the assignment, and the date the
assignment was scored.
Reproduced by McGraw-Hill Education (Australia) Pty Limited All legislation herein is reproduced by permission but
with the permission of IFRS Foundation®. Reproduction and does not purport to be the official or authorised version.
use rights are strictly limited. No permission granted to third It is subject to Commonwealth of Australia copyright. The
parties to reproduce or distribute. Copyright Act 1968 permits certain reproduction and
publication of Commonwealth legislation. In particular,
The International Accounting Standards Board, the IFRS s.182A of the Act enables a complete copy to be made
Foundation, the authors and the publishers do not accept by or on behalf of a particular person. For reproduction or
responsibility for any loss caused by acting or refraining publication beyond that permitted by the Act, permission
from acting in reliance on the material in this publication, should be sought in writing from the Australian Accounting
whether such loss is caused by negligence or otherwise. Standards Board. Requests in the first instance should
be addressed to the Administration Director, Australian
Accounting Standards Board, PO Box 204, Collins Street
West, Melbourne, Victoria, 8007.
xxiv Credits
Accountability is concerned with the relationships between groups, individuals, organisations and the rights
to information that such relationships entail. Simply stated, accountability is the duty to provide an account
of the actions for which one is held responsible. The nature of the relationships—and the attendant rights to
information—are contextually determined by the society in which the relationship occurs.
From this definition, we can see that accountability involves two responsibilities or duties, namely:
1. to undertake certain actions (or to refrain from taking actions) in accordance with the expectations of a group of
stakeholders; and
2. to provide a reckoning or account of those actions to the stakeholders
(Gray, Owen & Adams 1996)
Therefore, the broad role of ‘accounting’, and of a corporate report (and corporate reporting) is to inform relevant
stakeholders about the extent to which the actions for which an organisation is deemed to be responsible (which in itself
is a controversial issue as people can have very different views about the responsibilities of organisations) have actually
been fulfilled. Reporting provides a vehicle for an organisation to fulfil its requirement to be accountable. Such accounts
do not all have to be prepared in financial terms. For example, if an organisation is considered to be accountable for
its water consumption, or its greenhouse gas emissions, then such ‘accounts’ may be presented in physical terms. If a
company is considered to be responsible for the people who are making their products in developing countries then
it might produce ‘accounts’ about how the organisation is ensuring that factory workplaces in developing countries are
safe for the employees.
Of course, different people will have different views about the responsibilities of organisations, and therefore will
hold different views about what ‘accounts’ should be produced by an organisation. That is, they will have different views
about the extent of ‘accounting’ that should be applied.
Organisations will have many different responsibilities. These differing responsibilities will lead to many different
accountabilities. If we are to accept a very restricted view that organisations are accountable only for their financial
performance, then we would believe that organisations need only provide financial accounts. But if we are to accept
that organisations are responsible for their social performance and their environmental performance, then we would
also expect the organisation to produce social accounts and environmental accounts. The social accounts and the
The objective of general purpose financial reporting is to provide financial information about the reporting entity
that is useful to existing and potential investors, lenders and other creditors in making decisions about providing
resources to the entity. Those decisions involve buying, selling or holding equity and debt instruments, and
providing or settling loans and other forms of credit.
In identifying the ‘primary users’ of general purpose financial reports, paragraph OB5 of the conceptual
framework states:
Many existing and potential investors, lenders and other creditors cannot require reporting entities to provide
information directly to them and must rely on general purpose financial reports for much of the financial
information they need. Consequently, they are the primary users to whom general purpose financial reports
are directed.
The Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting also acknowledges that there are other potential users of
financial reports (for example, management, regulators and other members of the public), but they are not deemed to
be the ‘primary’ users of general purpose financial reports and hence these ‘secondary’ users are not the focus of the
prescriptions provided within the conceptual framework. As paragraphs OB9 and OB10 state:
The Australian Accounting Standards Board (AASB) is a government body. As we will see in the discussion to
follow, the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) oversees the activities of the AASB. The FRC was responsible for the
decision (made in 2003) that Australian reporting entities would adopt accounting standards issued by the International
Accounting Standards Board (IASB) for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2005.
As with the AASB, the functioning of the Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (AUASB) is also overseen by the
Financial Reporting Council. Since July 2006, auditing standards released by the AUASB have had legislative backing
(as do the accounting standards issued by the AASB).
We will now give further consideration to each of the four main bodies involved in formulating and/or enforcing
accounting regulations within Australia.
continued
WHO WE REGULATE
We regulate Australian companies, financial markets, financial services organisations and professionals
who deal and advise in investments, superannuation, insurance, deposit taking and credit.
As the consumer credit regulator, we license and regulate people and businesses engaging in
consumer credit activities (including banks, credit unions, finance companies, and mortgage and
finance brokers). We ensure that licensees meet the standards—including their responsibilities to
consumers—that are set out in the National Consumer Credit Protection Act 2009.
As the markets regulator, we assess how effectively authorised financial markets are complying
with their legal obligations to operate fair, orderly and transparent markets. We also advise the Minister
about authorising new markets. On 1 August 2010, we assumed responsibility for the supervision of
trading on Australia’s domestic licensed equity, derivatives and futures markets.
As the financial services regulator, we license and monitor financial services businesses to ensure
that they operate efficiently, honestly and fairly. These businesses typically deal in superannuation,
managed funds, shares and company securities, derivatives and insurance.
OUR POWERS
The laws we administer give us the facilitative, regulatory and enforcement powers necessary for us
to perform our role. These include the power to:
• register companies and managed investment schemes
• grant Australian financial services licences and Australian credit licences
• register auditors and liquidators
• grant relief from various provisions of the legislation that we administer
• maintain publicly accessible registers of information about companies, financial services licensees
and credit licensees
• make rules aimed at ensuring the integrity of financial markets
• stop the issue of financial products under defective disclosure documents
• investigate suspected breaches of the law and in so doing require people to produce books or
answer questions at an examination
• issue infringement notices in relation to alleged breaches of some laws
• ban people from engaging in credit activities or providing financial services
• seek civil penalties from the courts
• commence prosecutions—these are generally conducted by the Commonwealth Director of
Public Prosecutions, although there are some categories of matters that we prosecute ourselves.
SOURCE: www.asic.gov.au
As we have noted above, the Corporations Act requires financial statements, as defined above, to be ‘true and fair’.
The requirement to produce true and fair financial statements is set out in s. 297 of the Corporations Act. Specifically, s.
297 requires that:
The financial statements and notes for a financial year must give a true and fair view of:
(a) the financial position and performance of the company, registered scheme or disclosing entity; and
Directors’ declaration
Within the Directors’ Declaration, required pursuant to s. 295(4) of the Corporations Act, directors must state whether,
in their opinion, the financial statements comply with accounting standards, and that the financial statements give a true
and fair view of the financial position and performance of the entity. Importantly, directors must also state whether or not
in their opinion there were, when the declaration was made out, reasonable grounds to believe that the company would
be able to pay its debts as and when they fall due. Specifically, s. 295(4) states:
The directors’ declaration is a declaration by the directors:
(c) whether, in the directors’ opinion, there are reasonable grounds to believe that the company, registered
scheme or disclosing entity will be able to pay its debts as and when they become due and payable; and
(ca) if the company, registered scheme or disclosing entity has included in the notes to the financial statements,
in compliance with the accounting standards, an explicit and unreserved statement of compliance with
international financial reporting standards—that this statement has been included in the notes to the financial
statements; and
(d) whether, in the directors’ opinion, the financial statement and notes are in accordance with this Act, including:
(i) section 296 (compliance with accounting standards); and
(ii) section 297 (true and fair view); and
(e) if the company, disclosing entity or registered scheme is listed—that the directors have been given the
declarations required by section 295A.
Should directors make such a declaration fraudulently, carelessly or recklessly, it is possible that they might become
personally liable for any outstanding debts of the company. Exhibit 1.2 reproduces the Directors’ Declaration in the
2015 Annual Report of BHP Billiton Ltd.
At this stage you, the reader, should try to obtain some recent corporate annual reports. Find the Directors’ Declaration
in each report. You will see that, in most cases, the declaration will be similar in form to the example shown here. As
we discuss other accounting requirements throughout this book, please make a point of referring to your collection of
recent annual reports to see how the companies in your sample are complying with the various requirements that we
are discussing. Referring to corporate annual reports as you progress through this book will serve to give the material
you read a more ‘real-world’ feel. Most large, listed, Australian companies provide copies of their annual reports on their
websites. Indeed, in recent years companies have provided their annual reports on their websites as an alternative to
posting them out to their shareholders. For example, see the websites of:
The annual reports of corporations will typically be available by clicking on an ‘investors’ or ‘shareholders’ option (or
something similar) that is commonly shown on the home page of a company’s website.
Financial Accounting in the Real World 1.1 provides an extract from an article that emphasises that company
directors can be liable for the debts of a company if the directors sign the directors’ declaration stating that there are
reasonable grounds to believe that the organisation will be able to pay its debts as and when they become due and
Directors’ report
In the Directors’ Report, required pursuant to ss. 298–300A of the Corporations Act, directors must provide items of
information, such as the names of the directors, details of directors’ emoluments, the principal activities of the company,
review of operations during the year, significant changes in the state of affairs of the company, likely future developments
and results, significant post-reporting-date events and details about compliance with environmental laws.
The Directors’ Report often includes a great deal of information that is provided by corporations on a voluntary basis.
That is, while the Corporations Act stipulates the minimum level of disclosure that must be made in a Directors’ Report,
many organisations voluntarily produce additional information (which raises a number of interesting issues about why
they elect to disclose additional information when not required to—we will consider this again in Chapter 3). For example,
in recent years it has been common to find companies voluntarily providing information about community-based projects
in which they are participating, as well as employee-training schemes and safety initiatives, and company-promoted
environmental initiatives. Review the Directors’ Reports of a number of companies to see the variety of topics that are
addressed in these reports.
Liquidators have launched legal action against Nathan Tinkler after the coal baron allegedly allowed one of his
companies to trade while insolvent.
The action follows a decision by the NSW Supreme Court on Tuesday to approve a funding agreement between
Blackwood Corporation and the liquidators of Mulsanne Resources after Mulsanne failed to buy $28.4 million of
Blackwood shares last year, despite agreeing to do so.
Blackwood said in a statement that if the court finds Mulsanne’s directors liable for insolvent trading, it may make
compensation orders against them personally.
In a statement, Tinkler Group said: ‘The directors of Mulsanne strongly deny allegations of trading while insolvent
and will strongly defend any legal action instigated by the liquidators.’
In documents tendered in the NSW Supreme Court, Ferrier Hodgson said Mulsanne’s directors had no
reasonable grounds to believe the company could pay the $28.4 million when the time came to do so.
SOURCE: Extract from ‘High-stakes case for coal baron Tinkler’ by Gareth Hutchens, The Australian, 3 May 2013
The Directors’ Report also has to include an operating and financial review. The review should include information
that shareholders of the company would reasonably require to make informed assessments of the operations, financial
position and future strategies of the organisation. Specifically, s. 299A(1) of the Corporations Act states:
The directors’ report for a financial year for a company, registered scheme or disclosing entity that is listed
must also contain information that members of the listed entity would reasonably require to make an informed
assessment of:
(a) the operations of the entity reported on;
(b) the financial position of the entity reported on; and
(c) the ‘business strategies, and prospects for future financial years, of the entity reported on.
(a) the financial records of the company, disclosing entity or registered scheme for the financial year have
been properly maintained in accordance with section 286;
(b) the financial statements, and the notes referred to in paragraph 295(3)(b), for the financial year comply with
the accounting standards;
(c) the financial statements and notes for the financial year give a true and fair view (see section 297); and
(d) any other matters that are prescribed by the regulations for the purposes of this paragraph in relation to the
financial statements and the notes for the financial year are satisfied.
As we can see from the Directors’ Declaration provided in Exhibit 1.2, towards the end, the Directors’ Declaration
of BHP Billiton specifically notes that the directors received the declaration by the chief executive officer and the chief
financial officer.
Lastly, from time to time ASIC also releases regulatory guides (previously referred to as policy statements) that
relate to various issues, including financial reporting. For example, ASIC has released statements in relation to pension
accounting, related party transactions and valuing share options. To see current ASIC regulatory guides go to ASIC’s
website at www.asic.gov.au.
Figure 1.1
Organisational structure Diagrammatic
representation
The Minister of the structure
of Australian
accounting
standard-setting
Financial Australian Office of the Australian
Reporting Accounting Accounting
Council Standards Board Standards Board
Focus groups
Project
advisory panels
Interpretation
advisory panels
In performing its functions, the AASB must follow the broad strategic direction determined by the FRC under
paragraph 225(2)(c). [emphasis added]
Once the AASB makes an accounting standard, which as we know is generally the equivalent of a standard issued
by the IASB, it is the responsibility of the Commonwealth Parliament to either allow or disallow the standard. Before
being approved by parliament, standards released by the AASB are referred to as ‘pending’ accounting standards.
The accounting standards themselves will generally provide guidance on how a classification of items (for example,
inventory) should be identified, measured, presented and disclosed.
Once a pending accounting standard is approved by parliament, directors are required to ensure that a company’s
financial statements comply with the standard. This is in terms of s. 296 of the Corporations Act, which requires a
company’s directors to ensure that the company’s financial statements for a financial year are made out in accordance
with accounting standards.
As already noted, from 2004 there is also a requirement within the Corporations Act for the chief executive officer
and chief financial officer of listed companies to provide a written declaration to the board of directors to the effect that
the financial statements comply with accounting standards.
Most ‘small’ proprietary companies, however, are exempted from complying with accounting standards released by
the AASB. While the thresholds do change from time to time, at the time of writing, pursuant to the Corporations Act, s.
45A, a proprietary company is considered to be ‘small’ if it satisfies two of the following three tests:
1. Its gross operating revenue is less than $25 million (as determined by applying accounting standards).
2. Its gross assets are less than $12.5 million (as determined by applying accounting standards).
3. It has fewer than 50 equivalent full-time employees.
the financial report of a small proprietary company does not have to comply with particular accounting
standards if:
(a) the report is prepared in response to a shareholder direction under section 293; and
(b) the direction specifies that the report does not have to comply with those standards.
The above requirement therefore needs to be read in conjunction with s. 293. Section 293 states:
(1) Shareholders with at least 5% of the votes in a small proprietary company may give the company a direction
to:
(a) prepare a financial report and directors’ report for a financial year; and
(b) send them to all shareholders.
(2) The direction must be:
(a) signed by the shareholders giving the direction; and
(b) made no later than 12 months after the end of the financial year concerned.
(3) The direction may specify all or any of the following:
(a) that the financial report does not have to comply with some or all of the accounting standards;
(b) that a directors’ report or a part of that report need not be prepared;
(c) that the financial report is to be audited.
In relation to ‘for-profit private sector entities’ (which would include, for example, listed companies) we obviously
need to have some definition of ‘public accountability’ given its centrality to the above requirement. Appendix A of AASB
1053 defines it as follows:
Public accountability means accountability to those existing and potential resource providers and others
external to the entity who make economic decisions but are not in a position to demand reports tailored to
meet their particular information needs.
The above definition links directly to the definition of ‘general purpose financial statements’, which has been used
widely within financial reporting, and which has already been discussed earlier in this chapter. General purpose financial
statements are defined in AASB 1053 (and elsewhere, as we have already seen) as statements:
intended to meet the needs of users who are not in a position to require an entity to prepare reports tailored to
their particular information needs.
Tier 2 reporting requirements shall, as a minimum, apply to the general purpose financial statements of the
following types of entities:
(a) for-profit private sector entities that do not have public accountability;
(b) not-for-profit private sector entities; and
(c) public sector entities, whether for-profit or not-for-profit, other than the Australian Government and State,
Territory and Local Governments.
These types of entities may elect to apply Tier 1 reporting requirements in preparing general purpose
financial statements.
Therefore, for example, if a proprietary company is not deemed to be small (thereby not satisfying the ‘let-out’
provisions included at section 296(1A) of the Corporations Act) then it must, at the least, prepare Tier 2 financial
statements. Such financial statements would be referred to as complying with Australian Accounting Standards—
Reduced Disclosure Requirements. As paragraph 16 of AASB 1053 states:
Disclosures under Tier 2 reporting requirements are the minimum disclosures required to be included in general
purpose financial statements. Entities may include additional disclosures using Tier 1 reporting requirements as
a guide if, in their judgement, such additional disclosures are consistent with the objective of general purpose
financial statements.
The above requirements would also need to consider whether the organisation is a reporting entity and therefore
required to produce general purpose financial statements. Organisations producing financial statements that comply
with Tier 2 requirements are still considered to be producing general purpose financial statements. A reporting entity is
defined in AASB 1053 (and elsewhere) as:
An entity in respect of which it is reasonable to expect the existence of users who rely on the entity’s general
purpose financial statements for information that will be useful to them for making and evaluating decisions
about the allocation of resources. A reporting entity can be a single entity or a group comprising a parent and
all its subsidiaries.
An organisation that is not a ‘reporting entity’ and does not have ‘public accountability’ would not be impacted by
the requirements of AASB 1053 to the extent that the organisation does not elect to produce general purpose financial
statements.
The following do not apply to entities preparing general purpose financial statements under Australian
Accounting Standards—Reduced Disclosure Requirements:
A list of relevant paragraphs would then be provided. Some Australian Accounting Standards are equally applicable
to both Tier 1 and Tier 2 entities. Therefore, such Standards do not provide reduced disclosures for Tier 2 entities. Also,
some Standards apply only to Tier 1 entities, but Tier 2 entities may elect to use them. Examples are AASB 8 Operating
Segments and AASB 133 Earnings per Share, which generally apply only to listed entities.
While Australian Accounting Standards are generally equivalent to standards issued by the IASB (IFRS), AASB 1053
represents a departure from what is occurring at the international level. In 2009 the IASB issued its International Financial
Reporting Standard for Small and Medium-sized Entities. The IASB standard allows small and medium enterprises
(SMEs) to depart from various recognition, measurement and presentation requirements incorporated within IFRS. By
contrast, the view adopted by the AASB (as reported in the Basis for Conclusions that supports AASB 1053) was that
since Australia has adopted full IFRSs, it would be logical to use the public accountability notion used by the IASB in
determining which entities in the for-profit sector should apply Australian Accounting Standards in full (the definition of
‘public accountability’ as used by the AASB is identical to that used by the IASB).The Reduced Disclosure Requirements
(RDR) reflected in AASB 1053 are fundamentally different from the approach adopted in the IFRS for SMEs because
the RDR involve applying the same recognition and measurement requirements as Tier 1, whereas the IFRS for SMEs
modifies the recognition and measurement requirements of full IFRSs. The implications of the IASB approach to SMEs
is that there will be disparities in the choice of accounting policies by different entities because precedence will be
given to the conceptual framework over full IFRSs as the source of guidance for determining accounting policies in the
absence of a specific requirement.
Other reasons identified by the AASB for why it elected not to adopt the IASB’s approach to differential reporting
included:
• the additional initial and ongoing costs of training and education for two sets of standards both for the profession
and at the tertiary level
• that some subsidiaries of publicly accountable entities would find it burdensome to apply the proposed IFRS for SMEs
in preparing their general purpose financial statements. They would need to prepare financial information based on
the recognition and measurement requirements of full IFRSs for the purposes of the parent entity consolidation
• entities seeking to access international capital markets would generally apply full IFRSs
• a loss of comparability across all types of entities’ general purpose financial statements within Australia
• adoption of the IFRS for SMEs may be seen as a retrograde step in a country that has already adopted full IFRS
recognition and measurement accounting policy options
• in the event that an entity moves to, or from, full IFRSs, there would be costs involved in migrating from the recognition
and measurement requirements of one Tier of reporting to another.
While AASB 1053 does represent a relatively major change to the Australian financial reporting environment, the
requirements embodied within AASB 1053 are likely to be amended in the not-too-distant future. As paragraph BC20
from the Basis for Conclusions to AASB 1053 states:
The Board regards AASB 1053 as a pragmatic and substantive response to the need to reduce the burden of
disclosure requirements on Australian reporting entities. However, the Board does not regard it as a complete
or final answer to that need. The Board intends continuing its deliberations on revising the differential reporting
framework with a view to ongoing improvements (including having regard to decisions made by the IASB in
relation to its IFRS for SMEs). The Board concluded that the reforms in AASB 1053 should not be delayed while
consideration of other possible areas of reform continues.
Apart from the issue of differential reporting as addressed in AASB 1053, some AASB accounting standards are
applicable only to specific classes of companies (for example, companies listed on the Australian Securities Exchange).
Further, ASIC may, from time to time and pursuant to the Corporations Act, release a Class Order that grants relief from
where a company’s financial statements for a financial year would not, if made out in accordance with a
particular applicable accounting standard, give a true and fair view of the matters with which this division
requires the financial statements to deal, the directors need not ensure that the financial statements are made
out in accordance with that accounting standard.
The above requirement, which allowed directors to elect not to comply with an accounting standard if non-compliance
was deemed necessary to create true and fair accounts, was referred to as the ‘true and fair override’. The perspective
taken was that in some isolated cases, certain accounting standards might not be appropriate for a particular entity, and
application of the standards might actually make the financial statements misleading. However, this view was abandoned
some years later, and the corporations law was amended and the override withdrawn such that s. 296 of the Corporations
The tendency of an increasing number of companies to seemingly avoid complying with approved Accounting
Standards at will has, in the past, been accompanied by an extreme reluctance on the part of the body
responsible for enforcing the law—in the main the National Companies and Securities Commission (NCSC)—
to pursue transgressors through the courts because of a perceived difficulty of successfully prosecuting the
companies against the ‘true and fair defence’. Henry Bosch, the former chairman of the NCSC, has said: ‘No,
there were no prosecutions, for the reason I gave Mr Scholes earlier on—that the true and fair overrides. I told
you of a particular case where there was a flagrant breach of an Accounting Standard—the goodwill standard.
I was advised that I would not win. It was also put that if we took the case and lost, the dam would burst and
everybody would see that what we were saying could not be sustained in court. It seemed too risky to go down
that road.’
At present, it appears unlikely that the true and fair override will be reintroduced. Further, if companies were permitted
to depart from accounting standards because they believed the departure was necessary to present a true and fair view,
then these same companies could not thereafter claim to be presenting financial statements in conformity with IFRS—
something that is claimed to be valuable to ‘the marketplace’.
So directors must comply with the applicable accounting standards. Nevertheless, if directors believe that particular
accounting standards are not appropriate, they have the option of highlighting this fact and explaining why. Specifically,
paragraph 23 of AASB 101 Presentation of Financial Statements (the reference to ‘the Framework’ below relates to the
Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting) states:
In the extremely rare circumstances in which management concludes that compliance with a requirement in
an Australian Accounting Standard would be so misleading that it would conflict with the objective of financial
statements set out in the Framework, but the relevant regulatory framework prohibits departure from the
requirement, the entity shall, to the maximum extent possible, reduce the perceived misleading aspects of
compliance by disclosing:
(a) the title of the Australian Accounting Standard in question, the nature of the requirement, and the reason
why management has concluded that complying with that requirement is so misleading in the circumstances
that it conflicts with the objective of financial statements set out in the Framework; and
(b) for each period presented, the adjustments to each item in the financial statements that management has
concluded would be necessary to achieve a fair presentation.
As we can see from the above, AASB 101 includes a rebuttable presumption that if other entities in similar
circumstances comply with the requirement, the entity’s compliance with the requirement would not be so misleading
that it would conflict with the objective of financial statements set out in the Conceptual Framework.
A current problem is that our qualitative requirement (defined below) of true and fair is very unclear. There is no legal
definition of ‘true and fair’. Even though the Corporations Act requires directors to make sufficient disclosures to ensure
that financial statements present a ‘true and fair’ view, it provides no definition of the concept. Nor has the Australian
accounting profession provided definitive guidelines relating to truth and fairness. The Directors’ Declaration of BHP
Billiton, reproduced in Exhibit 1.2 above, shows how directors are required to state that the financial statements are
true and fair. The auditors of a company are also required to give an opinion on whether, in their opinion, the financial
statements are true and fair.
Exhibit 1.3 shows the opinion section of the auditor’s report from Commonwealth Bank of Australia 2015 Annual
Report. Apart from the audit opinion section, an audit report of a corporation also typically includes sections on the
respective responsibilities of directors and auditors.
FOOTNOTES:
[16] Told by White-Bear.
16. NO-TONGUE AND THE SUN AND
THE MOON.[17]
There was a young man in a village who wanted to be great. In
olden times the chief thing among the people was to be a great
warrior. The young men in those times used to go out among the
hills, and then find a place to stand and mourn. They used to stay
away from home four or five days without drinking or eating.
Now this particular young man went out alone, upon a high hill, to
mourn. In the afternoon a little bird came to him, and said: “This is
not the place where you should stand. I will show you where you
must stand.” So the little bird flew and the boy followed. The bird
stopped at a certain place, and the boy stood there. Late in the
evening a man came to the boy. The man was all painted red, and
he said to him: “I am glad to see you. You are going to be my son,
and I am going to take you with me now. All I want from you is your
tongue.” So the young man pulled his tongue out, cut it off and
handed it to the man. As he handed his tongue to the man he fell
down and died. It was now dark, and as the young man fell the Moon
rose and saw this young man fall down, and the Moon said to
himself: “That man who has killed this young man is always trying to
do something that is not right. I know who that man is; it is the Sun. I
know that he has taken this young man’s tongue.” So the Moon went
to the young man and touched his feet, and the young man waked
and sat up.
When No-Tongue saw the strange man he did not know what to
do. He was not the same man who had taken his tongue. This man
looked white, because he was the Moon. The Moon asked No-
Tongue why he had given away his tongue and to whom he had
given it. No-Tongue answered, “How can I talk without a tongue?”
The Moon said, “Speak, and tell me.” So the boy spoke, and he
found that he was able to talk. So he began to tell what the man
looked like. The Moon said he was sure that the man was the Sun.
Then the Moon spoke to No-Tongue, and said: “The Sun was trying
to kill you. No-Tongue, hereafter you shall be my son; but let your
other father, the Sun, come after you first. I must tell you what to say.
You will not be killed by the Sun. The Sun is coming for you to-
morrow morning, and when you go up to our dwelling place (the
heavens) he is going to show you some things that he has. You must
now be careful not to take the new things that he has, but you shall
take the old things. Take the old weapons. The Sun thinks a great
deal of these old weapons.” This is all that the Moon said. The Moon
then disappeared.
In the morning, the Sun came to No-Tongue and took him up into
the sky to his home, and said, “Now, my son, I want you to choose of
these things that I have here.” No-Tongue took the oldest things.
When the Sun saw that No-Tongue took the best things—the oldest
ones—he came out from his lodge crying, because this would give
No-Tongue a long life, and would also make him become great, and
this was what the Sun did not want of No-Tongue. He had thought
that No-Tongue would surely take the new things. But if No-Tongue
had taken the new things, that would have shortened his life and
made it impossible for No-Tongue to become great. Then the Sun
began to think of some way to kill No-Tongue, but he never could
take back the things No-Tongue had taken, having promised them to
him. As they came out from the Sun’s lodge the Sun said: “My son,
look. There is your home. Look all around you. You can see
everything plainly. When you go home, after two days have passed,
you must go on the war-path, and you will conquer old enemies. You
will have all you want. You are to be great. But when you, my son, go
home, give to me a white buffalo robe.” So the Sun went away.
When night came, the Moon came out and spoke to No-Tongue,
and asked what the Sun had said to him. No-Tongue told the Moon
all that the Sun had told him, and the Moon said, “Do not give him
the white buffalo robe, but give that to me, and get a dark-brown
robe for the Sun.” The Moon then began to tell No-Tongue what to
do. He told him to get some white clay and make powder out of it,
and then pour the white powder all over the robe, so that it would
look white. So No-Tongue did as he was told to do.
When the Sun received the white buffalo robe, which really was
not white, he was proud of it; furthermore, he was proud that his son
had obtained it for him. One day he hung the robe out, and the wind
was blowing hard. The wind shook all the white clay out of the robe,
so that the robe turned to a dark-brownish color. Then the Sun saw
that it was not a real white buffalo robe, and did not like it.
When the Moon and the Sun got together, the Sun said, “I am
sorry for what my son has done to me, and now my dear son is
going to kill him.” The Sun had a son who belonged to another tribe,
and this was the son who was to kill No-Tongue. So the Moon heard
all that the Sun had to say.
One night the Moon saw No-Tongue, and told the young man all
that the Sun had said. The Moon said that the Sun could not do
anything to kill him. The Moon said: “The man that you are to fight
with is going to try to shake hands with you, because he is your
cousin,—not a real cousin, but because you are the son of the Sun
and so is he,—so he is your cousin. He is the one who has been
selected to kill you. But do not be afraid; I shall be with you and will
help you all I can. Do not shake hands with the young man, your
cousin, and if you must shake hands, do not shake with your right
hand. Be very careful not to let him strike you first. If you should
shake hands with him, strike him. You must not let him strike you
first; and when you have killed him, cut his head off and put it under
a big stone that shall be near you, so that the Sun will not make him
live again. By placing the head under the stone the Sun will be
prevented from bringing him to life.” The Moon also said, “Be careful
to do what I have told you to do.” No-Tongue was glad. The Moon
also told No-Tongue that the young man he was to fight with was
named Little-Sun.
Two days after this some warriors went out on the war-path.
Before they had gone far the Sun went to No-Tongue, and said: “My
son, I am glad you are going on the war-path; I want you to kill a
man for me. He is coming. He thinks he is great, but he is not. So kill
him for me.” The Sun said all of this, not meaning it, for he was
planning that Little-Sun might kill No-Tongue. So the warriors started
on the war-path, and in a few days they came to the place which
they thought would be a good place to remain for a while. The
leaders selected scouts to go out and look over the country. The
scouts went up a high hill, and there they met the spies of the enemy
coming up from the other side. These did not stop, but turned
straight back again, and went and told the enemy, and of course the
other scouts turned back and told their leaders that the enemy was
coming. So in the morning, the two sets of people came together,
and they fought a battle; but before starting the battle there was a
man who stood in front of the enemy’s line, and said, “No-Tongue, I
want you to come and shake hands with me, for you are amongst
those people.” No-Tongue went to him, and when they were nearly
together, everybody saw that the two were dressed so as to look
very much alike, but they did not know that they were to fight each
other; but the two knew that they were to fight, and that they were
both sons of the Sun. No-Tongue did what the Moon had told him to
do. He killed Little-Sun. Then No-Tongue’s people defeated the
enemy. They took many scalps, and returned home.
The Sun became mad at No-Tongue, because he had killed Little-
Sun, for the Sun had expected No-Tongue to be killed. The Sun had
tried three times to kill No-Tongue; so the fourth time, the Sun
himself was going to scalp No-Tongue, so that the people would
make fun of him. Then the Sun told his other son, Big-Sun, to try and
kill No-Tongue. No-Tongue was the only one living. He was the one
who had not treated his father, the Sun, right, for the Sun had not
treated No-Tongue right in the first place. But No-Tongue had been
assisted by the Moon.
The third time the Sun tried to kill No-Tongue, he changed himself
into a Buffalo, so that the Buffalo ran after No-Tongue, but the young
man, No-Tongue, ran into a mud-hole, and the Buffalo fell in too. No-
Tongue got out of the muddy place, but the Buffalo could not come
out, because he was so heavy. No-Tongue told a lot of men to get
some dried willows and to place them upon the back of the Buffalo.
This they did. They set the wood on fire, so that the Buffalo burned
up.
In the evening, when the Sun and Moon were together in the
heavens, the Sun said: “I shall do something to No-Tongue, some
way.” The Moon heard the Sun say this. Then the Sun said to the
Moon: “Just see what my son No-Tongue has done; he burned my
back. To-morrow morning I am going to scalp him, so the people in
the village will be afraid to see him, and so they will make fun of
him.”
Then the Moon went to No-Tongue in the night, and said: “My son,
you always like to be up early in the morning, singing. I want you to
get a good scalp to-night—one that has hair, just like this. Then kill a
dog and get some of its blood, put the blood inside the scalp, and put
the false scalp over your head so your hair will not show.”
The boy got the scalp with the hair on it, killed a dog, put some of
the blood in the scalp and hung it over his bed. Early in the morning,
before the Sun rose, the boy arose, put the scalp over his head,
went out, and sang some songs through the village. As the Sun
came up in the east the boy heard a noise, and the Sun took the
scalp off from the boy, so that the blood ran down. When the Sun
saw that he was satisfied. The boy went into the lodge, washed,
came out again, and the Sun saw that the boy had hair on, and that
he was not really scalped. When the Sun reached the Moon he told
him that he was going to let No-Tongue alone until he was old and
great, and that he was then going to take him up to his home.
The Moon came to No-Tongue and told him what the Sun, his
father, had said. Years went by, and No-Tongue lived peacefully.
Finally he became old and blind. At this time the people were about
to move away from this place to another place. The Moon came and
told old man No-Tongue that it was time his father, the Sun, was
coming after him to take him up to his home; and that he himself
would come with the Sun to take him up; that he should not be
afraid.
While they were breaking camp the old man took his clothes that
he used to wear in his early days, and put them on. He also painted
himself. He told the people to go on; that he himself would come
later. The people went on. The old man went up on the top of a hill,
made a circle of red sticks to represent the Sun, and another of white
sticks, to represent the Moon, for the west side. While he was doing
this the Sun and Moon came. The Sun wanted to know what the
Moon was doing there. No-Tongue said, “My father, the Moon is also
my father; he has helped me all along.” So the Sun was satisfied,
and the Sun took the old man up to his home.
Several days afterwards, four young men went to the place where
the old man had sat, and he was gone. The sticks were there as he
had left them, but No-Tongue was gone. He was never heard from or
seen again after that. He was called “No-Tongue,” for the Sun had
taken his tongue, but after he had failed to kill him, he gave him back
his tongue.
FOOTNOTES:
[17] Told by Standing-Bull.
17. HOW BURNT-HANDS BECAME A
CHIEF.[18]
There was a large village in a beautiful valley near a large tract of
timber. It was in the winter time. Around the outside of the village and
over a knoll lived Stanapaat, or Burnt-Hands, a boy of about eleven
or twelve years, and his grandmother. The boys in the village came
over the knoll to urinate on the tipi of these poor people. In this
village lived one of the chiefs who had four daughters, the youngest
of which was very charitable toward these poor people. Her name
was Last-Child. She brought food to these folks whenever she could.
Red-Bear and Black-Bear were the first chiefs of this village. They
ruled their people as though they were slaves.
One day Red-Bear gave notice that the whole village was to turn
out on an elk hunt. The next day, the people complied with the
chief’s orders. The people, as they went through the timber in the
deep snow, slaughtered the elk in great numbers. Burnt-Hands with
other little fellows followed the chase. He watched the hunters
butchering their game. He wished he could kill and take home to his
grandmother the nice elk meat. He strode off in another direction,
looking around as he went. As he went on he struck a fresh track
with drops of fresh blood on clean snow, and there were no footprints
of a hunter following. He took up the trail and followed it for a long
distance. He found, to his great delight, a dead elk with two arrows
through its chest. “Ah ho! Ah ho! The great chief knows I am poor.
He has had mercy on me.” While he was looking all over the animal
he heard a voice. He looked up, and who was there but the two
chiefs—Red-Bear and Black-Bear.
Red-Bear gave an angry grunt and struck the boy in the face.
“Who are you and how did you find this elk? I never expected to find
such a worthless burnt-belly looking fellow as you.” Pulling his
arrows out of his quiver, he said, “My father will be glad to have you
for his meal,” and he shot two arrows through the boy. He dragged
him out on the ice to a large air-hole and said, as he dropped him,
“Father, I have done as you bid me.”
In this stream there lived a big White-Bear in a lodge. The young
cub heard something drop outside the lodge. He told his father. The
old one said, “Go out and see what it is.” The cub saw poor Burnt-
Hands in his ragged clothing and with wounds. The cub felt pretty
bad for the boy and told his father about him. The father told the cub
to bring the boy in. “What a poor boy you are!” said White-Bear. “I
know who you are, and how you were treated. I never expected to
eat a man from Red-Bear’s tribe. I commanded him to feed me on an
enemy. I will have great mercy on you. From now on you shall be my
son. You shall treat Red-Bear just as he has treated you. I will enjoy
his flesh. I will endow you with all the power I have. I will teach you
all, and you shall go back and do as I say.” White-Bear and Burnt-
Hands then sat down and began the bear ceremony, Burnt-Hands
learning everything and receiving his bundle of medicine and other
things. He was then shown the way out by the cub.
Burnt-Hands went on to his grandmother’s little home. When he
arrived there he called his grandmother to kindle the fire, as he had
come. Before this, when the boys found out that Burnt-Hands’
grandmother was worrying, they would come in, saying,
“Grandmother, I have come home,” just to tease her. The old woman
thought the boys were teasing her now when Burnt-Hands called.
She gave a pitiful cry, saying, “You boys ought to feel satisfied with
your teasing now.” “Oh, no, Grandmother! I am here! I was lost on
the chase. Following up an elk I strayed off to a place I knew nothing
about. I could not find my way home, so I stayed all night.” His
grandmother arose. When she had kindled the fire there sat her boy.
She rejoiced, for she was glad her boy was alive.
Nobody in the whole village knew what had happened to Burnt-
Hands except Black-Bear, who had witnessed what Red-Bear did.
He did not like what Red-Bear had done, but he did not say anything.
One day the scouts, on picket duty, saw a large herd of buffalo.
The chiefs were notified. They gave notice that everybody should
turn out to the chase, and that Red-Bear wanted the hide of the
white buffalo that was in the herd. Burnt-Hands heard the call. He
told his grandmother to help him make arrows. He also promised her
the white buffalo robe. This was a secret surprise to his
grandmother, who did not know that he was anything more than a
“burnt-belly.”
The next day every one turned out to go on the chase. Burnt-
Hands started out on foot with his quiver. A kind young man on
horseback caught up with him, and asked him to get on behind him.
He did so. While they were riding, the young man told the boy about
the white buffalo. The boy asked his friend if he would put the meat
and his white hide on his horse for him. They made plans to be
together and help each other on the chase. The hunters had all
collected on a hill, talking and smoking their pipes. The two arrived
and sat around for a long while. Burnt-Hands began to inquire what
they were waiting for. They answered they were waiting for the
chiefs. “This will not do; if we wait here there may come up a bad
storm and we will go home empty handed. Come now, and let us
have our chase. Those chiefs will come later, and they will get their
share of the meat anyway. I want that white buffalo robe, and when
you have taken it off give it to this young man and he will take it
home for my grandmother.”
The men were all agreed to what Burnt-Hands said. They thought
Red-Bear would kill him and not themselves. They got on their
ponies and the chase began. The white buffalo was killed and the
chase ended. Burnt-Hands was walking along when his friend came
and gave him a ride to where they were butchering. He took him
where the white buffalo was and the men were standing around
looking at the animal. “What are you waiting for now?” said Burnt-
Hands. “Get to butchering and give me the hide!” When they had
begun, the chiefs came. They gave them a welcome and told Red-
Bear that Burnt-Hands had advised them to start the chase and had
already spoken for the hide. Red-Bear and Black-Bear said
everything would be all right, and that the boy could have the hide
and some meat.
The hunters were all on their way home. Red-Bear ordered them
to camp at a certain place. This they did. Burnt-Hands and his friend
came to the camp and found the meat cooking, and a comfortable
place made for the chiefs. “What is this place for? and are you afraid
to sit here?” said Burnt-Hands. “That place is for the chiefs,” said
they, “and that meat.” “Come,” said Burnt-Hands to his friend, “sit
here with me and enjoy the meat with me.” The young man, with the
rest, thought that Red-Bear would surely kill the boy this time. Burnt-
Hands and his friend sat down on the robes and ate the meat
prepared for Red-Bear. The chiefs came, and Red-Bear ordered
another place and food prepared for him. He did not dare to say or
do anything to the boy, suspecting his power as he did. Burnt-Hands’
friend and the others thought that Red-Bear had mercy on the poor
boy, since he did not hurt him.
Burnt-Hands went home with his friend and pulled off the meat
and the white buffalo hide. “Here, grandmother, is what I promised
you, and a lot of meat. You now know that I can hunt and bring home
game.” His grandmother was at once overjoyed. She thought about
the pretty girl who always showed them charity. She sent out for
Last-Child, who came in. “You have always been kind to us, and I
have always been thankful. I want you to have this hide, and to have
a robe made for yourself. You are young yet, and it will become you
more than me.” Burnt-Hands was talked about all over the village,
but they did not know that he had been blessed by a Bear.
A long time after this chase the chief gave out an order for
everybody to go on an elk chase. Red-Bear had been accustomed to
collect all the elk teeth. This was his object for the hunt. Burnt-Hands
heard the order and began to make preparations for the hunt. He
promised his grandmother an elk-tooth dress. Burnt-Hands told his
grandmother that if any trouble arose on his account she must flee
into the timber, and on through other timber, and there wait for him.
The next day the chase was to come off. The hunters had great luck
and were talking happily in the woods. There was a cry here and
there for Red-Bear to come and get his teeth. Burnt-Hands and his
friend were together. He told his friend to take the teeth out for him,
for he did not know how. His friend was a little afraid to do it, but
Burnt-Hands said it would be all right. The men, too, rather hesitated
to let him have the teeth. They told him that Red-Bear had spoken
for all the teeth; but he paid no heed to it, and told his friend to take
them. Burnt-Hands had collected a lot of teeth, and so had Red-
Bear. The hunters had chased the elk on to a smooth piece of ice
and had killed several there. Here, Burnt-Hands and Red-Bear saw
each other doing the same work. They met on the last elk, and
Burnt-Hands spoke and said: “You have enough teeth. You will keep
off and let me have these.” Red-Bear gave an angry grunt, and said,
“A child like you cannot have much to say.” As Red-Bear leaned over
to take the teeth Burnt-Hands took his war-club and struck him on
the head. He took him by the feet and dragged him to the air-hole.
“Father, this is what you asked of me.” A great yell was raised, and
war was made on the boy.
The boy fled to the village and peeped in, to see if his
grandmother had done what he had told her to do. She was gone,
and he followed her and found her beyond the second timber as he
had directed. “Now,” said he, “take one of these bear claws off my
wrist and open the little bag of paint.” This she did, and he began to
sing and perform the ceremony. He adorned his grandmother and
himself according to the instruction of his Bear father. The people
had all turned out to kill him for what he had done. Still others were
calling it wrong to harm the boy, and reminded the people of what
bad ruling Red-Bear had done.
Burnt-Hands and his grandmother had turned into Bears, and
were making a big noise, growling and grunting. Nearer and nearer
the warriors circled around the timber, shouting and yelling. The boy
told his grandmother to be first to attack. So she did so. She caught
Red-Bear’s brother and four or five others of his near relatives. “Now,
I will attack,” said Burnt-Hands, “for you must be tired.” He picked out
the leaders and the influential men of the village and scalped them
and tore them up. The warriors began to retreat. A cry was raised to
end the fight, as many had been killed, but how to stop the boy and
the old woman they did not know. They assembled and filled the
peace-pipe. They gave it to Last-Child to take to the boy and the old
woman. She took the pipe and came toward them, they growling
wildly. The boy knew it was the girl. He told his grandmother not to
charge at her. The boy accepted the peace-pipe and both smoked it.
This ended the fight.
Burnt-Hands asked his grandmother how old she would like to be.
She said, “About thirty-eight,” and so she was. The boy made
himself about twenty-two, and when all was quiet he married Last-
Child. Burnt-Hands came to be chief, and had Black-Bear as his
slave. The people lived happily under his rule.
FOOTNOTES:
[18] Told by White-Bear.
18. HOW BURNT-HANDS BECAME A
CHIEF.[19]
Once there was an old woman and her grandson. They were very
poor; they had nothing. The boy’s name was Burnt-Hands. Some
warriors got together in the village and planned to go on the war-
path. Burnt-Hands heard of it. He told his grandmother that he
wanted to join the warriors on the war-path. She told the boy that
when he went he must never tell Coyote stories on the war-path.
She gave him a round burnt clay ball that had a handle to it. She told
Burnt-Hands to go; that the clay ball with the handle was his war-
club; that when on the way, when he should become hungry he
should place it upon the fire, put kernels of corn upon it, and roast
them.
These warriors went out to a camp in the woods. The young man
came up with them and lay down by them. The next day they went
and in the afternoon they sat down to rest. They made fun of the boy,
and said, “Now tell us some Coyote stories.” But the boy refused,
and said, “My grandmother told me not to tell Coyote stories while on
the war-path.” They coaxed the boy to sing, but he would not sing.
The boy was hungry. As he saw that the men were not moving on
he placed his clay ball upon the fire and put some kernels of corn
upon it and began to roast them. While he was doing this he said, “I
will tell some Coyote stories.” The boy began to tell how the enemy
came and attacked a certain war-party. At the same time he kept on
roasting his corn.