Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PDF International Business Hill 9Th Edition Solutions Manual Online Ebook Full Chapter
PDF International Business Hill 9Th Edition Solutions Manual Online Ebook Full Chapter
Solutions Manual
Visit to download the full and correct content document: https://testbankbell.com/dow
nload/international-business-hill-9th-edition-solutions-manual/
More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant
download maybe you interests ...
http://testbankbell.com/product/international-business-hill-9th-
edition-test-bank/
http://testbankbell.com/product/international-business-competing-
in-the-global-marketplace-hill-10th-edition-solutions-manual/
http://testbankbell.com/product/global-business-today-
canadian-4th-edition-hill-solutions-manual/
http://testbankbell.com/product/global-business-today-9th-
edition-hill-test-bank/
International Business Competing in the Global
Marketplace Hill 10th Edition Test Bank
http://testbankbell.com/product/international-business-competing-
in-the-global-marketplace-hill-10th-edition-test-bank/
http://testbankbell.com/product/test-bank-for-global-business-
today-9th-edition-by-hill/
http://testbankbell.com/product/test-bank-for-international-
business-competing-in-the-global-marketplace-13th-edition-
charles-hill/
http://testbankbell.com/product/international-economics-theory-
and-policy-krugman-obstfeld-9th-edition-solutions-manual/
http://testbankbell.com/product/solution-manual-for-
international-business-competing-in-the-global-marketplace-12th-
edition-charles-w-l-hill-g-tomas-m-hult/
International Business Hill 9th Edition Solutions
Manual
9-1
Introduction
Chapter Summary
9-2
Chapter 09 - Regional Economic Integration
Then, ask students to consider economic integration from the perspective of a firm
outside the bloc.
Next, ask students to consider economic integration from the perspective of a consumer.
Try to organize student responses in a positive/negative chart on the board, and then at
the end of the discussion, ask students whether they would support economic integration
or not.
1. Explore the implications of the recent ruling by European Court of Justice on the
broadcasts of Premier League matches. What doe the ruling mean for consumers? How
does it affect companies? How might advertisers change their strategies?
2. The recent ruling caught both ESPN and Sky by surprise as well as the soccer clubs
themselves. Consider the decision from the perspective of the European companies.
How should they respond to the decision? What are the long term implications of the
ruling?
3. Reflect on your response to the first two questions, then discuss the benefits and
challenges of economic integration. Is it always beneficial for all parties? Explain your
response.
9-3
Chapter 09 - Regional Economic Integration
LECTURE OUTLINE
This lecture outline follows the Power Point Presentation (PPT) provided along with this
instructor’s manual. The PPT slides include additional notes that can be viewed by
clicking on “view”, then on “notes”. The following provides a brief overview of each
Power Point slide along with teaching tips, and additional perspectives.
Despite the rapid spread of regional trade agreements designed to promote free trade,
there are those who fear that the world is moving toward a situation in which a number of
regional trade blocks compete against each other. In this scenario of the future, free trade
will exist within each bloc, but each bloc will protect its market from outside competition
with high tariffs.
The most enduring free trade area in the world is the European Free Trade Association.
EFTA currently joins four countries-Norway, Iceland, Liechtenstein, and Switzerland.
Other free trade areas include the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).
Another Perspective: A site with information and additional links on NAFTA is available
at {http://www.fas.usda.gov/itp/Policy/NAFTA/nafta.asp}. The site includes
downloadable power point presentations on the benefits of NAFTA
Customs unions around the world include the current version of the Andean Pact
(between Bolivia, Columbia, Ecuador and Peru).
Currently, MERCOSUR, the South America grouping that includes Brazil, Argentina,
Paraguay, and Uruguay, is aiming to eventually establish itself as a common market.
The European Union (EU) is an economic union, although an imperfect one since not all
members of the EU have adopted the euro, the currency of the EU, and differences in tax
rates across countries still remain.
9-4
Chapter 09 - Regional Economic Integration
Regional economic integration can be seen as an attempt to achieve additional gains from
the free flow of trade and investment between countries beyond those attainable under
international agreements such as the WTO.
The political case for integration has two main points: 1) by linking countries together,
making them more dependent on each other, and forming a structure where they regularly
have to interact, the likelihood of violent conflict and war will decrease, and 2) by linking
countries together, they have greater clout and are politically much stronger in dealing
with other nations.
Whether regional integration is in the economic interests of the participants depends upon
the extent of trade creation as opposed to trade diversion. Trade creation occurs when
low cost producers within the free trade area replace high cost domestic producers. Trade
diversion occurs when higher cost suppliers within the free trade area replace lower cost
external suppliers. A regional free trade agreement will only make the world better off if
the amount of trade it creates exceeds the amount it diverts.
The EU is by far the more significant, not just in terms of membership, but also in terms
of economic and political influence in the world economy.
The forerunner of the EU was the European Coal and Steel Community, which had the
goal of removing barriers to trade in coal, iron, steel, and scrap metal formed in 1951.
The EEC was formed in 1957 at the Treaty of Rome. While the original goal was for a
common market, progress was generally very slow.
9-5
Chapter 09 - Regional Economic Integration
The Single European Act called for the removal of border controls, mutual recognition
of standards, open public procurement, a barrier free financial services industry, no
currency exchange controls, free and open freight transport, and freer and more open
competition.
The Treaty of Maastricht, signed in 1991, committed the EU to adopt a single currency,
the euro, by January 1, 1999. The euro is used by 17 of the 27 member states. By
adopting the euro, the EU has created the second largest currency zone in the world after
that of the U.S. dollar.
Since its establishment January 1, 1999, the euro has had a volatile trading history with
the U.S. dollar. Initially, the currency fell in value relative to the dollar, but has since
strengthened.
Another Perspective: The European Union has a web page devoted to the euro
{http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/euro/index_en.htm}. Students can explore the site
and click on the pages to see pictures of the coins and notes, the advantages of
participating in the euro zone, and frequently asked questions about the euro.
Another Perspective: The European Central Bank maintains a web site with current
information on the euro. The site is available at {http://www.euro.ecb.int/}.
Another Perspective: At one point in time, joining the Euro Zone had been the goal of
many Eastern European countries. Now however, given the recent financial crises that is
threatening the future of the euro, many are rethinking their plans. To learn more, go to
{http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/11_27/b4235017725502.htm}.
9-6
Chapter 09 - Regional Economic Integration
Several countries, particularly from Eastern Europe, have applied for membership in the
EU. In December of 2002, the EU formally agreed to accept the applications of 10
countries, and they joined on May 1, 2004. Today, membership is up to 27 countries.
The free trade agreement between the United States, Canada, and Mexico became law
January 1, 1994.
The Andean Pact, originally formed in 1969, was based on the EU model, but was far less
successful in achieving its stated goals. In 1990, the Andean Pact was re-launched, and now
operates as a customs union.
In some industries MERCOSUR is trade diverting rather than trade creating, and local
firms are investing in industries that are not competitive on a worldwide basis.
9-7
Chapter 09 - Regional Economic Integration
There are two other trade pacts in the America, the Central American Trade Market and
CARICOM, although neither has made much progress as yet.
If the FTAA is established, it will have major implications for cross-border trade and
investment flows within the hemisphere. The FTAA would create a free trade area of 850
million people.
Another Perspective: Additional information on the Free Trade of the Americas can be
found at {http://www.ftaa-alca.org/alca_e.asp}.
Formed in 1967, ASEAN currently includes Brunei, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines,
Singapore, Thailand, and, most recently, Vietnam, Myanmar, Laos, and Cambodia. The
basic objectives of ASEAN are to foster freer trade between member countries and to
achieve some cooperation in their industrial policies.
APEC currently has 21 members including such economic powerhouses as the United
States, Japan, and China. The stated aim of APEC is to increase multilateral cooperation
in view of the economic rise of the Pacific nations and the growing interdependence
within the region.
There are nine trade blocs on the African continent however progress toward the
establishment of meaningful trade blocs has been slow.
The EU and NAFTA currently have the most immediate implications for business.
The greatest implication for MNEs is that the free movement of goods across borders, the
harmonization of product standards, and the simplification of tax regimes, makes it
possible for firms to realize potentially enormous cost economies by centralizing
9-8
Chapter 09 - Regional Economic Integration
production in those locations where the mix of factor costs and skills is optimal. Through
specialization and shipping of goods between locations, a much more efficient web of
operations can be created.
Just as the emergence of single markets in the EU and North America creates
opportunities for business, so it also presents a number of threats.
CRITICAL THINKING AND DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
QUESTION 1: NAFTA has produced significant benefits for the Canadian, Mexican and
U.S. economy. Discuss.
QUESTION 2: What are the economic and political arguments for regional economic
integration? Given these arguments, why don't we see more integration in the world
economy?
9-9
Chapter 09 - Regional Economic Integration
QUESTION 3: What effect is the creation of a single market and a single currency within the EU
likely to have on competition within the EU? Why?
ANSWER 3: By creating a single market and currency, member countries can expect
significant gains from the free flow of trade and investment. This will result from the
ability of the countries within the EU to specialize in the production of the product that
they manufacture the most efficiently, and the freedom to trade those products with other
EU countries without being encumbered by tariffs and other trade barriers. In terms of
competition, the competition between European firms will increase. Some of the most
inefficient firms may go out of business because they will no longer be protected from
other European companies by high tariffs, quotas, or administrative trade barriers.
Companies from those countries that have not adopted the euro may find that their costs
are higher as they deal with currency exchanges. In addition, because it will be easier to
compare prices across markets, firms in the euro zone will be pushed to lower prices and
become more efficient.
ANSWER 4: Many students will probably suggest that the European Commission has a
right to regulate the European market, even if the regulation involves American
companies. Students taking this perspective will probably suggest that such restrictions
should be made independently of other considerations, even when the parent
governments of the companies have approved the mergers. Other students however, may
argue that the European Commission does not have the right to restrict a merger that has
been approved by parent governments. In doing so, the European Commission is in
effect protecting domestic companies from foreign competition, and violating the spirit of
the WTO.
QUESTION 5: How should a U.S. firm that currently exports to only ASEAN countries
respond to the creation of a single market in this regional grouping?
ANSWER 5: A U.S. business firm that is currently exporting to only ASEAN countries
should seriously consider opening a facility somewhere in this grouping, as the
economics of a common market suggest that outsiders can be at a disadvantage to
insiders. The opening of borders within the ASEAN bloc also has the potential to
increase the size of the market for the firm. Of course it is possible, after careful
consideration, that exporting may still be the most appropriate means of serving the
market.
9-10
Chapter 09 - Regional Economic Integration
ANSWER 6: The creation of the single market means that it may no longer be efficient
to operate separate duplicative production facilities in each country. Instead, the facilities
could either be linked so that each specializes in the production of only certain items or
several sites should be closed down and production consolidated at the most efficient
locations. Existing differences between countries as well as the need to be located near
important customers may limit a firm’s ability to fully consolidate or relocate production
facilities for production cost reasons. Minimizing production costs is only one of many
objectives. For example, location of production near R&D facilities can be critical for
new product development. The location decision needs to examine long run economic
success, not just cost minimization.
QUESTION 7: After a promising start, MERCOSUR, the major Latin American trade
agreement, has faltered and made little progress since 2000. What problems are hurting
MERCOSUR? What can be done to solve these problems?
ANSWER 7: MERCOSUR originated in 1988 as a free trade pact between Brazil and
Argentina. The pact was expanded in 1990 to include Paraguay and Uruguay with the
goal of becoming a full free trade area by 1994, and a common market sometime after.
While initially considered a success, critics began to question whether the trade diversion
effects of MERCOSUR outweighed it trade creation effects. Then, in 1998 member
states slipped into a recession and in 1999, Brazil’s financial crisis led to a significant
devaluation of its currency creating further turmoil. Finally, in 2001, Argentina beset by
economic stresses asked that the customs union be temporarily suspended, effectively
ending MERCOSUR’s quest to become a fully functioning customs union. However, in
2003, Brazil’s new president announced his support for a revitalized and expanded
MERCOSUR that would be modeled after the EU, but by 2011, little progress had been
made.
Another Perspective: Students can check the current status of the agreement online
{http://www.sice.oas.org/trade/mrcsr/mrcsrtoc.asp}.
To solve the problems of MERCOSUR, the countries should reduce or eliminate high
tariffs on products that can be produced more efficiently in other parts of the world. It
should strive to develop industries in which it has a comparative advantage and direct its
financial resources to those industries. Finally, it should begin to develop an economy
that fosters the free flow of trade and goods throughout the region.
ANSWER 8: In 1994, a Free Trade of the Americas (FTAA) was proposed. If the
agreement comes about, it would effectively create a free trade area of nearly 800 million
people responsible for more than $18 trillion in GDP in 2008. However, the U.S., while
initially a strong advocate of the agreement, has lessened its support for the FTAA
9-11
Chapter 09 - Regional Economic Integration
recently. The question of whether the agreement is good for the U.S. and Canada will
likely produce a lively debate among students.
QUESTION 9: Reread the Management Focus case on the European Commission and
Media Industry Mergers, then answer the following questions:
a) Given that both AOL and Time Warner were U.S. based companies, do you think the
European Commission had a right to review and regulate their planned merger?
b) Were the concessions extracted by the European Commission from AOL and Time
Warner reasonable? Whose interests was the Commission trying to protect?
c) What precedent do the actions of the European Commission in this case set? What are
the implications for managers of foreign enterprises with substantial operations in
Europe?
ANSWER 9: a) This question deals with the delicate issue of just how far a country can
extend the reach of its law, and should set the stage for a good debate. While some
students will argue that the European Commission is overstepping its boundaries by
restricting mergers between American companies doing business in Europe, other
students will recognize that the U.S. might act in a similar fashion if American firms
were being threatened by foreign companies seeking to merge and operate in the U.S.
market.
b) Time Warner and EMI, bowing to pressure from the European Commission, agreed to
drop their joint venture plans after the European Commission raised concerns about the
size of a jointly owned company, which would have been three times that of the next
largest competitor. According to the European Commission, the joint venture would
have too much market power. The European Commission’s goal was to preserve a
competitive market for consumers. A similar situation existed with the Time Warner
AOL deal, which if approved would dominate the emerging market for downloading
music over the Internet. The companies involved had little choice in the matter, if they
wanted to operate in the European market, they had to follow the rules.
c) Some students will argue that the European Commission had no right to become
involved in the business decisions of the companies, especially the ones from the United
States. Others however, will probably note that one of the roles of the European
Commission is to preserve a fair market system that protects consumers. In this
particular case, that meant that the deals had to be blocked.
9-12
Chapter 09 - Regional Economic Integration
exported from the United States. Discussion of the case can revolve around the following
questions:
QUESTION 1: What are the potential economic benefits of the trucking provisions in the
NAFTA treaty? Who benefits?
ANSWER 1: Under the NAFTA agreement trucks from Mexico are no longer required
to unload their goods and reload them onto U.S. trucks. Instead, Mexican trucks can
simply cross the border and continue to their final destination. These changes save time
and also money – efficiencies that can then be passed along to consumers. In addition,
because U.S. truckers must now compete with Mexican truckers, further savings should
be created. Most students will probably suggest that if the NAFTA agreement is
followed, U.S. consumers should benefit as should Mexican truckers. The real losers
appear to be U.S. truckers. Most students will probably recognize that this situation
accounts for the strong stance the Teamsters have taken against the agreement.
QUESTION 2: What do you think motivated the Teamsters to object to the trucking
provisions in NAFTA? Are these objections fair? Why did Congress align itself with the
Teamsters?
QUESTION 3: Does it make economic sense for the United States to bear the costs of
punitive tariffs as allowed for under NAFTA, as opposed to letting Mexican trucks enter
the United States?
ANSWER 3: When the United States initially failed to abide by provisions set forth in
NAFTA regarding trucks, Mexico gave the country a second chance to honor its
commitment. The United States responded with bureaucratic measures designed to block
Mexican trucks from entering the country. Mexico immediately implemented new tariff
policies on various U.S. goods destined for Mexico. Under the new policies, grape
exporters faced 45 percent tariffs and other U.S. exporters faced 20 percent tariffs. Most
students will probably agree that Mexico’s response was justified and suggest that the
effort by the United States to protect the Teamsters simply hurt another group of
Americans. Students may also note that U.S. consumers and companies should benefit
from the efficiencies that the agreement should provide, and that the efforts to protect a
single group are misguided.
9-13
Chapter 09 - Regional Economic Integration
Another Perspective: To learn more about the trucking conflict between the United States
and Mexico go to {http://www.businessweek.com/news/2011-11-08/mexican-trucks-
stay-home-after-17-year-push-to-open-u-s-border.html} and
{http://www.businessweek.com/news/2011-10-14/mexico-to-lift-tariffs-as-u-s-approves-
trucking-permit.html}.
INTEGRATING iGLOBES
There are several iGLOBE video clips that can be integrated with the material presented
in this chapter. In particular, you might consider the following:
Title: ‘No Clear Path Forward” For Eurozone As Economic Woes Continue
Run Time: 9:55
Abstract: This video explores the crisis in the European Union, and specifically within
the Eurozone countries, and what it could mean for the United States if it is not quickly
resolved.
Key Concepts: European Union, euro, Eurozone, global economy, exports, trade,
foreign investment, political economy, globalization, global capital markets, economic
integration, globalization of production, political and economic risk
Notes: The problems in the European Union and specifically in the Eurozone countries
have gone from bad to worse with two previously “strong” countries, France and
Germany, now showing signs of weakness. The bloc’s problems emerged almost two
years ago when the European Union’s poorer countries including Greece, Portugal, Italy,
and Spain began to show signs of trouble. Now, thanks to both general fear and real
problems, it seems that the financial uncertainty has spread to what had been relatively
healthy economies.
Germany, long a dominant force in the Eurozone, relies on other Eurozone countries as
markets for about two-thirds of its exports. As growth in these markets has stalled so too
has demand for German products. In fact, the bloc as a whole grew just two-tenths of
one percent in the second quarter of 2011. Now, in recognition of the fact that a
coordinated policy is necessary if the bloc is to survive, discussions are underway to
create European fiscal union. When the Eurozone was established a decade ago, a
common currency was introduced, but a common fiscal policy was not implemented.
Now, France’s President Nicholas Sarkozy and German Chancellor Angela Merkel are
leading the charge to coordinate the group’s corporate and tax base policy. Even with
this new effort however, there is still concern that it may not be enough. Analysts warn
that bold actions are necessary.
The United States is watching the situation in Europe carefully. The European Union
buys some 25 percent of U.S. exports so it is critical to the health of the U.S. economy
9-14
Chapter 09 - Regional Economic Integration
that Europe’s economy is stable and growing. Already the U.S. Treasury Department,
the Federal Reserve, the European Central Bank, and the European financial authorities
are meeting regularly to assess the situation and consider alternative actions. Perhaps
most alarming however, is that conditions in both the United States and Europe seem to
be getting worse, not better. Furthermore, there is no clear strategy going forward of how
best to address the situation and in doing so, ward off a potential crisis.
Discussion Questions:
1. Explain the various levels of economic integration. What level of integration has the
European Union achieved? How will plans to create fiscal union change the relationship
between member countries?
2. Why is Germany now leading the charge for fiscal coordination? How has Germany’s
reliance on the Eurozone countries contributed to its own economic slowdown?
3. Reflect on the notion of fiscal union within the European Union. Why is it becoming
necessary? Can it be achieved quickly enough to avert financial disaster within the
trading bloc?
4. Consider the crisis in Europe from the perspective of the United States. How would
financial collapse in Europe affect the United States?
INTEGRATING VIDEOS
There are also several longer video clips that can be integrated with the material
presented in this chapter. In particular, you might consider the following from
International Business DVD Volume 6:
Learning Objectives
The purpose of this video is to help you:
❖ Understand how social media platforms are increasing the pace of globalization.
❖ Examine how new methods of communication are replacing more traditional ones.
❖ Recognize the marketing implications of how people communicate via social media.
❖ Explore how social media platforms may be changing social activism.
Key Words
❖ Globalization
❖ Global economy
❖ Technological change
❖ Cultural change
❖ Levels of economic development
9-15
Chapter 09 - Regional Economic Integration
Synopsis
When the earthquake hit Haiti last year, many people, both within the country and
outside, immediately got on Twitter and Facebook to get information about what was
happening, and to communicate with each other. This crisis was one of the first of its
kind in that rather than using more traditional forms of communication like the telephone
or television, large numbers of people turned to new forms of technology like Twitter and
Facebook. Even news reporters were scanning postings to learn more about the crisis.
This may reflect a global trend in which social media platforms are replacing long
established means of communication.
After the earthquake, many people posted messages to family members indicating that
they had survived and providing information about other friends and families. Some
people also provided details about what had occurred and what they had seen. Some
postings included information about problems that would probably occur as a result of
the earthquake such as shortages of medical supplies and water. People outside Haiti
were able to learn from these accounts of the extent of the devastation, and get a feel for
what was ahead for the Haitian people and the country as a whole.
Twitter and Facebook were also the first choice for many social activists and global
health organizations involved with the crisis. Social activists were able to leverage the
power of the social media platforms to reach out to people for help. Wyclef Jean, a
popular Haitian musician, asked his 1.3 million Twitter followers to donate money to
help for example. Interestingly, the efforts of activists like Jean were made easier
because of the availability of social media platforms and cell phones. People could
respond to their requests simply by sending a text message indicating their willingness to
donate money. Global organizations like the Red Cross were also able to use social
media platforms to raise awareness of the needs of the Haitian people and to organize
contributions.
Discussion Questions
1. Discuss how new technologies emerged as a preferred form of communication after the
earthquake in Haiti. What conclusions might a company targeting consumers in a
developing country like Haiti draw from this phenomenon?
2. What challenges do social network platforms like Twitter and Facebook face in
developing countries? Why might first mover advantages be important in these markets?
3. Reflect on the differences in how people use social networking platforms based on
their geographic location. How can companies capitalize on the growing use of social
media networks in developing countries and emerging markets?
4. Discuss how social media platforms are changing the way social activists raise
awareness and gain support for their causes. How can companies that support social
causes leverage these same opportunities?
9-16
Chapter 09 - Regional Economic Integration
Exercise 1
Your company is seeking to expand by opening new customer representative and sales
offices in the European Union (EU). The size of the investment is significant and top
management wishes to have a clearer picture of the current and probable future status of
the EU. A colleague who spent some time living in the EU indicated that Eurostat might
be a comprehensive source to assist in your project. After evaluating the state of the EU
based on the statistics and publications available, prepare an executive summary
describing the features you consider as crucial in completing your report.
Exercise 2
Trade agreements can impact the cultural interactions between countries. In fact, the
establishment of the Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA) can be considered a threat
as well as an opportunity for your company. Identify the main negotiating groups a
country must consider when a member. Choose two negotiating groups and justify their
importance to member countries.
Answers to Exercises
Exercise 1
A variety of reports and statistics can be accessed by searching the term “Eurostat” at
http://globaledge.msu.edu/ResourceDesk/. At the bottom of the linked Eurostat webpage
are a series of publications, tables, and data that are useful for completing this exercise. In
addition, the Publications tab found at the top of the webpage can provide considerable
material for an analysis. Be sure to click on the Resource Desk link to search this area of
the globalEDGE website.
Exercise 2
A variety of reports and statistics can be accessed by searching the term “Eurostat” at
http://globaledge.msu.edu/ResourceDesk/. At the bottom of the linked Eurostat webpage
are a series of publications, tables, and data that are useful for completing this exercise. In
addition, the Publications tab found at the top of the webpage can provide considerable
material for an analysis. Be sure to click on the Resource Desk link to search this area of
the globalEDGE website.
9-17
Chapter 09 - Regional Economic Integration
Logitech
1. In a world without trade, what would happen to the costs that American consumers
would have to pay for Logitech’s products?
Answer: Logitech moved its manufacturing to Taiwan and China in an effort to save
money and maintain a competitive advantage. While labor costs were a factor in the
decision to shift its manufacturing, other costs were also considered. The case notes that
Taiwan offered a well-developed supply base for parts, qualified people, and a rapidly
developing local computer industry. In addition, the company was able to secure space
for only $200,000. In China, Logitech is able to employ workers for just $75 per day. If
Logitech were not able to take advantage of opportunities such as these, and export its
product back to the United States, American consumers would pay significantly higher
prices for the company’s products.
2. Explain how trade lowers the costs of making computer peripherals such as mice and
keyboards?
Answer: The theories of Smith, Ricardo, and Hecksher-Ohlin show why it is beneficial
for a country to engage in international trade even for products it is able to produce for
itself. International trade allows a country to specialize in the manufacture and export of
products that can be produced most efficiently in that country, while importing products
that can be produced more efficiently in other countries.
3. Use the theory of comparative advantage to explain the way in which Logitech has
configured its global operations. Why does the company manufacture in China and
Taiwan, undertake basic R&D in Freemont and Switzerland, design products in Ireland,
and coordinate marketing and operations from California?
9-18
Chapter 09 - Regional Economic Integration
Answer: The theory of comparative advantage suggests that it makes sense for a country
to specialize in producing those goods that it can produce most efficiently, while buying
goods that it can produce relatively less efficiently from other countries—even if that
means buying goods from other countries that it could produce more efficiently itself.
Logitech has successfully located the various parts of its value added chain around the
world to take advantage of those attributes that are available in each of the locations in
which it operates.
4. Who creates more value for Logitech, the 650 people it employs in Fremont and
Switzerland, or the 4,000 employees at its Chinese factory? What are the implications of
this observation for the argument that free trade is beneficial?
Answer: Logitech has taken great care in configuring its global value chain to lower
production costs while maintaining the value of those assets that lead to differentiation.
Logitech undertakes basic R&D work in Switzerland, and also in Fremont. Fremont is
also the location for the company’s global marketing, finance, and logistics operations.
Clearly, Logitech is successfully exploiting the benefits of the American and Swiss labor
force, while at the same time taking advantage of the lower costs of production available
in China. Logitech’s operations support the argument that free trade is beneficial.
5. Why do you think the company decided to shift its corporate headquarters from
Switzerland to Fremont?
Answer: Switzerland is still important to Logitech. Indeed the company undertakes basic
R&D work there. However, in an effort to be closer to many of America’s high-
technology enterprises, Logitech moved its headquarters to Freemont, California.
Freemont is now home to the company’s global marketing, finance, and logistics
functions, and is also the location for some additional R&D work.
6. To what extent can Porter’s diamond help explain the choice of Taiwan as a major
manufacturing site for Logitech?
Answer: According to Porter, four broad attributes of a nation shape the environment in
which local firms compete, and these attributes promote or impede the creation of
competitive advantage. The four attributes are factor endowments, demand conditions,
related and supporting industries, and firm strategy, structure, and rivalry. The first
attribute, factor endowments, clearly helps explain the choice of Taiwan as a major
manufacturing site for Logitech. Taiwan has a well-developed supply base for parts, as
well as qualified people. In addition, Taiwan’s rapidly expanding local computer
industry (related and supporting industries) also puts the country in a strong position to be
a major manufacturing site for Logitech.
9-19
Chapter 09 - Regional Economic Integration
7. Why do you think China is now a favored location for so much high technology
manufacturing activity? How will China’s increasing involvement in global trade help
that country? How will it help the world’s developed economies? What potential
problems are associated with moving work to China?
Answer: Foreign companies now account for three-quarters of China’s high tech exports.
Porter’s diamond would suggest that like Taiwan, China has strong factor endowments
and strong related and supporting industries. Together, these attributes make China an
attractive location of high-tech manufacturing. China’s increasing involvement in global
trade should help the country by spurring its economic growth. This in turn, should
create more demand for imports which should be beneficial to the world’s developed
economies.
2. Most Ecuadorean roses are sold in the United States or Europe. Who in these countries
benefits from the importation of Ecuadorean roses, and how do they benefit? Who loses?
Do you think the benefits outweigh the costs?
Answer: Roses imported from Ecuador have transformed the floral industry in both
Europe and the United States. Prior to the growth of Ecuador’s rose industry, roses were
available only in limited quantities and varieties, and were generally very expensive in
the United States and Europe. Today, however, consumers in both markets have been
able to benefit from the ready supply of high quality flowers available at relatively low
prices. Most students will probably recognize that while consumers have benefited from
the growth of Ecuador’s rose industry, growers in the United States and Europe have not.
However, many students will probably conclude that in this situation, because Ecuador’s
industry benefits not only its own citizens, but also consumers in other markets like the
United States and Europe, the benefits do indeed outweigh the costs. Other students
however, may wonder whether the damage to the environment that may be occurring
because of the growth in the industry is indeed worth it.
3. How does the rose export industry benefit Ecuador? Do these benefits have any
implications for the United States and Europe?
9-20
Chapter 09 - Regional Economic Integration
Answer: Ecuador is now the world’s fourth largest producer of roses. Rose farms in the
country support tens of thousands of jobs. Revenues and taxes from the industry have
been used to help pave roads, build schools, and construct irrigation systems. Many
workers earn more in the industry than they could elsewhere. Some students however,
may note that in rose-growing cities like Cayambe, populations have swelled
significantly putting pressure on the resources within the region. In addition,
environmentalists worry that the industry is not following proper safety precautions with
the chemicals it uses. In then end though, many students will probably argue that indeed
the industry has been beneficial to the country, and that the growth of the industry may in
fact also benefit both the United States and Europe as those markets see their export
opportunities increase as a result of greater prosperity in Ecuador.
4. How should developed nations respond to reports of poor working conditions in this
industry? Should importers in some way certify Ecuadorean producers, only importing
from those who adhere to strict labor and environmental standards?
Answer: The question of whether the working conditions are appropriate in developing
nations strikes an ethical chord with many people. Most students probably agree that it is
vital for developed countries to challenge developing nations to ensure that workers in
their countries are provided safe working conditions. Already, pressure from European
consumer groups have prompted some Ecuadorian growers to voluntarily join programs
designed to ensure worker safety. Many students will probably suggest that programs
like these will put pressure on other growers to implement similar measures. However,
students may also note that some growers may be reluctant to adopt safety measures
because such programs are likely to increase costs. Students may also recognize that
many consumers will continue to buy the cheapest roses available, regardless of how they
were grown, and may be unwilling to support efforts to import only from those growers
who are certified.
Another Perspective: For more information on the rose industry in Ecuador, visit
{http://www.globalpolicy.org/globaliz/cultural/2003/02flowers.htm}.
9-21
Chapter 09 - Regional Economic Integration
Answer: The European Union is hoping to liberalize its energy market. By doing so,
increased competition among energy producers should result in greater efficiencies,
economies of scale, and lower prices for consumers. Indeed, consumers could ultimately
be the biggest winners if the move is successful.
2. What are the implications of liberalization for energy producers in the EU? How will
the environment they face change post liberalization? What actions will they have to
take?
Answer: Efforts to liberalize the energy markets in the European Union have met with
considerable resistance from producers and in some cases from local governments. At
the heart of the issue is the fact that the energy market in the European Union is currently
highly inefficient and nationalistic. Each nation essentially has its own producers, often
formerly owned by the state, that serve the majority of the market. Most producers have
vertically integrated into other areas of the business, and are unwilling to allow foreign
producers to utilize parts of their business to serve local customers. Governments too are
reluctant to allow acquisitions by foreign companies because of the local job losses such
moves could imply. If the efforts at liberalization continue, it is likely that the business
will be split into several areas including generation, transmission, and marketing.
Companies will operate in only one of these areas, for example producing power, rather
than in all of them as is the case with the current business model.
3. Why is the de-integration of large energy companies seen as an important part of any
attempt to liberalize the EU energy market?
Answer: The European Union believes that it is necessary to de-integrate large energy
companies in order to liberalize the energy markets in the bloc. At the moment, most
nations have a single large company that dominates the market, making it very difficult
for new companies to break in. Furthermore, since most companies have vertically
integrated into producing, transmitting, and marketing energy, they have resisted efforts
to allow other companies into even parts of the business. The European Union wants to
de-integrate the business so that independent companies can buy from the cheapest
source, resell to consumers and so on, and create the competition necessary to force
producers to become more efficient.
4. Why do you think progress towards the liberalization of the EU energy market has
been slow so far?
Answer: In 2007, national energy ministers rejected a request from the European
Commission to de-integrate the energy companies. France and Germany have been
9-22
Chapter 09 - Regional Economic Integration
particularly vocal about the request – both countries stand to lose from such a request
because they both have large vertically integrated energy companies. Most students will
probably agree that progress towards the liberalization of the market is likely to continue
to be slow since the major beneficiaries of the market liberalization are consumers, rather
than producers. Many students will probably agree that since producers stand to lose
from liberalization, and nations could individually be hurt, efforts to slow the process will
probably continue.
Answer: Government policies to promote the production of ethanol, like many other
types of market intervention, are designed to help the producer with little regard for the
consumer. In this particular situation, U.S. and EU farmers are receiving subsidies for
growing soy and corn to be used for ethanol production. This has pushed the prices of
both products up, and because some farmers are switching from other types of crops like
wheat to soy in order to take advantage of the subsidies, the policies have also resulted in
an increase in other food prices as well. Most students will probably realize that
consumers are certainly on the losing end of the deal, as they face higher prices in the
grocery store. Moreover, because the United States and the European Union have also
implemented tariffs against an alternative raw material for ethanol production, sugar
cane, producers in sugar producing countries like Brazil have also suffered.
2. One estimate suggests that if food prices rise by one third, they will reduce living
standards in rich countries by about three percent, but in very poor ones by about twenty
percent. According to the International Food Policy Research Institute, unless there is a
change in policies, cereal prices will rise by 10-20 percent by 2015, and the expansion of
bio-fuel production could reduce calorie intake by 2-8 percent by 2020 in many of the
world’s poorest nations. Should rich countries do anything about this? If so, what?
Answer: This is a difficult question that will probably stir some debate. For decades,
consumers have enjoyed the benefits of increased productivity and output in the global
food industry. In 2007, however, everything changed. The price of wheat reached its
highest point ever, and the price of corn rose 60 percent over its 2006 price. Two factors
contributed to this situation. The first was the increased demand for food from China and
India. The second factor involved tariffs and subsidies for bio-fuels. Farmers in the
European Union and in the United States are currently the recipients of subsidies for the
production of crops used in bio-fuels. As a result, land that might be used for growing
food is being converted to bio-fuel crops, pushing up prices on food. While some experts
believe that sugar cane may be a better product for bio-fuel production than corn, tariffs
on imported sugar cane effectively are keeping the crop out of the market. While all
consumers are feeling the pain of higher food prices, the situation is especially dire for
9-23
International Business Hill 9th Edition Solutions Manual
3. The argument for giving subsidies to ethanol producers rests upon the assumption that
ethanol results in lower CO2 emissions than gasoline, and therefore benefits the
environment. If we accept that global warming is itself a serious problem, should we not
be encouraging government to increase such subsidies? What are the arguments for and
against doing so? On balance, what do you think is the best policy?
Answer: While most students will probably agree that global warming is a serious
problem that must be addressed, they will probably also conclude that simply providing
subsidies to farmers who produce soy or corn is not a solution. Indeed, most scientists
agree that ethanol produced from sugar cane is superior to that produced from corn or soy
simply because it is produced using the waste portion of the sugar cane. Consequently,
the notion that soy farmers and corn farmer should continue to receive subsidies while
tariffs are maintained against sugar cane imports from Brazil suggests a protectionist
agenda in both the United States and in the European Union. Some students may also
note that ethanol is only part of the solution to the problem of global warming. Other
programs with fewer negative effects should also be considered. Some students for
example, may suggest that the money spent subsidizing farmers might be better spent
installing solar powered panels, or wind turbines.
Another Perspective: There are two iGLOBES that deal directly with the issues in this
case. The first is Supply, Price of Food Increase Hardship for World’s Poor, and the
second is Agricultural Problems Lead to Farmer Suicides in India.
9-24