Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Future Trading Upon Organized Commodity Markets in The United States G Wright Hoffman Online Ebook Texxtbook Full Chapter PDF
Future Trading Upon Organized Commodity Markets in The United States G Wright Hoffman Online Ebook Texxtbook Full Chapter PDF
Future Trading Upon Organized Commodity Markets in The United States G Wright Hoffman Online Ebook Texxtbook Full Chapter PDF
https://ebookmeta.com/product/industrializing-the-united-states-
heather-price-wright/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/handbook-of-frogs-and-toads-of-the-
united-states-and-canada-third-edition-albert-hazen-wright/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/latin-america-development-
programming-and-united-states-investments-cement-g-motten/
The Future of Work in the United States Discourses on
Automation and the Platform Economy 1st Edition Natalie
Rauscher
https://ebookmeta.com/product/the-future-of-work-in-the-united-
states-discourses-on-automation-and-the-platform-economy-1st-
edition-natalie-rauscher/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/united-states-anna-obiols/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/the-legal-effects-of-recognition-
in-international-law-as-interpreted-by-the-courts-of-the-united-
states-john-g-hervey/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/power-and-willpower-in-the-
american-future-why-the-united-states-is-not-destined-to-
decline-1st-edition-robert-j-lieber/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/reproductive-politics-in-the-
united-states-1st-edition-kimala-price/
FUTURE TRADING
FUTURE TRADING
UPON
ORGANIZED COMMODITY MARKETS
IN THE
UNITED STATES
by
G. WRIGHT HOFFMAN
PHILADELPHIA
U N I V E R S I T Y OF PENNSYLVANIA P R E S S
London: Humphrey Milford: Oxford University Press
1932
Copyright 1932
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA PRESS
Printed in the United States of America
To
Florence Fernstrum Hoffman
PREFACE
The purpose of a preface is usually two-fold: to permit the
author to acknowledge his indebtedness to others, and to allow
him to venture an opinion regarding the place and use of his
treatise. In both of these matters, the statements of authors are
always greatly abridged and, partly because they are abridged
and partly due to the inherent difficulties of the task, are usually
defective. The present preface is not an exception in these re-
gards.
In the matter of indebtedness to others, I am sincerely grate-
ful to my colleagues in the University of Pennsylvania for
counsel and assistance and particularly to Professors S. S.
Huebner and H. J. Loman. I am, also, greatly indebted to my
associates in the work of the Grain Futures Administration in
the United States Department of Agriculture, particularly to
Dr. J. W. T. Duvel, Chief of the Grain Futures Administration,
Mr. J. M. Mehl, Assistant Chief, Mr. H. S. Irwin, Agricultural
Economist, and Mr. Ε. M. Blaylock, Assistant Chief Account-
ant.
Beyond the limits of these two groups, I am indebted to a
number of men actively engaged in the grain and cotton trade.
These include Mr. W. G. Reed of Geo. H. McFadden and
Brother, Mr. Lowell Hoit of Lowell Hoit and Company, Mr.
A. R. Marsh of the New York Cotton Exchange, Mr. Louis
Sayre of the Rosenbaum Grain Corporation, Mr. J. H. Frazier
of the Commercial Exchange of Philadelphia, Mr. Karl H.
Rehnberg and Mr. E. J. Dies both of the Chicago Board of
Trade. Each of these men read portions of the manuscript and
supplied valuable criticism which I am glad here to acknowl-
edge. From Mr. Reed and Mr. Hoit especially, I have had most
generous help. The secretaries of the various exchanges have
kindly supplied me with needed reports and information. To
these and many others whom I have called upon for informa-
tion or counsel my sincere thanks are due.
vii
viii PREFACE
PARTI
Chapter V I I I . T H E M A R K E T S T R U C T U R E : BROKERS A N D
TRADERS 133
1. Brokers.
2. Traders.
3. Summary.
Chapter IX. ORGANIZATION AND RULES OF EX-
CHANGES 147
1. The nature of an exchange.
2. Organization of exchanges.
3. Rules and regulations of Exchanges.
4. Summary.
Chapter X. T R A D I N G PROCEDURE 161
1. The operations of trading.
2. Kinds of orders.
3. Other trading operations.
4. Summary.
Chapter XI. C L E A R I N G OF F U T U R E CONTRACTS 185
1. The need for a clearing system.
2. Development of clearing methods.
Chapter XII. C L E A R I N G OF F U T U R E CONTRACTS ( C O N -
TINUED) 201
3. Present-day methods of clearing contracts.
4. Legality of the clearing process.
5. Summary.
PART I I
BIBLIOGRAPHY 471
INDEX 475
TABLES
Table Page
1. The Principal Exchanges and Commodities in which Future
Trading is Maintained in the United States Judged by the
Total Value of Trading in the Year 1929 10
2. Early Growth in the Grain Exports of the United States 15
3. Inspections of Grain into Chicago Elevators, June 15-De-
cember 31, 1858 26
4. The Volume of Trading in Cotton Futures on the New York
Market for 1869 and 1870 and upon the New York Cotton Ex-
change for Specified Years, 1871-1929 43
5. The Volume of Future Trading and an Estimate of its Aggre-
gate Value, by Commodities and by Exchanges, for the year
1929 54
6. Monthly Marketings of Wheat by Fanners, in Percentages,
Average of the 10-Year Period, 1920-1929 61
7. The Consumption of Cotton and the Active Cotton Spindles
in the United States, by Sections for the Years 1870 and 1928,
Showing the Growth of the Cotton Industry in the South . . . 81
8. The List of Grades Constituting the Universal Standards for
American Upland Cotton Showing the Estimated Proportions
of each Grade Composing the 1930 Crop 85
9. The Estimated Quantity and Distribution of Staple Lengths
for the 1930 Crop of American Upland and American-Egyp-
tian Cotton 88
10. The Amount of Grain Used to Fulfill Future Contracts on
the Chicago Board of Trade for the Three Futures 1924 Sep-
tember, 1924 December, and 1925 May, Combined 107
11. Cotton Future Contracts Fulfilled by the Delivery of Ware-
house Receipts on Two Leading Cotton Exchanges, for the
Three Crop Years 1919-20, 1920-21, and 1921-22, Combined 108
12. Cash and Future Contracts Contrasted 109
13. Interaffiliations of Commodity Exchanges through Firm
Membership 123
14. Average Changes between Cash Sales Prices of Various
Wheats at Beginning and End of Crop Year, for a Twenty-
one Year Period 249
15. Twenty-two Year Average of Monthly Cash Prices for
Wheat, Corn, Oats and Cotton Based on the Periods, 1900-
1914 and 1921-1929 250
16. Car-lot Purchases of Wheat and Oats made by a Leading
Firm upon the Chicago Board of Trade on August 11, 1930,
xiii
xiv TABLES
Table Page
Showing Premiums and Discounts Based upon the Septem-
ber Future 261
17. A Limit Sheet Sent by a Cotton Firm to its Representative
to be used as the Basis of Purchase of Spot Cotton at Country
Points 264
18. Grades of Grain Deliverable on Future Contracts upon the
Chicago Board of Trade during 1929 Showing the Differen-
tials Over or Under the Contract Price for Each Grade 281
19. Points "on" or "off" the Contract Price Paid by or Allowed to
the Seller of Cotton Futures for Various Grades of American
Upland Cotton Measured by the Mean of the Spot Prices Pre-
vailing on Ten Designated Spot Markets, January 11, 1930 . . 289
20. Car Inspections of Wheat at Chicago Showing the Proportion
of No. 2 Winter to All Grades for Ten Years, 1920-1929 293
21. Classification of the 1928 American Cotton Crop by Type,
Color, Grade and Staple 295
22. The Average Grade of Each American Upland Cotton Crop
as Reported by Shepperson Annually from 1915 to 1928 . . . 296
23. The Volume of Trading and the Open Commitments in Wheat
Futures upon the Chicago Board of Trade Compared with
the Receipts and Visible Supply of Wheat at Principal Mar-
kets, for Six Crop Years, 1924-1929 326
24. Number of Days on which the Net of Individual Purchases
and Sales of 500,000 Bushels or Over and the Future Price
Moved in Same Direction, for Wheat, for Leading Specu-
lators, All Futures Combined, from January 2, 1925, to De-
cember 31, 1926 :.... 335
25. An Illustration of a Hedged Transaction in Oats 384
26. An Illustration of a Hedged Transaction as a Problem in
Basis 385
27. An Illustration of the Use of a "Give-up" in Hedging, Using
Two Different Future Prices 395
28. Aggregate Long and Short Positions in Wheat Futures of
Members of the Millers' National Federation, for Quarterly
Dates, 1926-1931 416
29. The Average Monthly Fluctuation (in per cent) in the Whole-
sale Price of a Group of Food, Farm and Miscellaneous Prod-
ucts, for the period 1890-1925 (excluding 1914-1921) 433
30. Correlation of September Future Prices of Oats during the
Growing Season with Cash Prices in September 437
CHARTS
Figure Page
1. The Principal Channels of Trade in the Merchandising of the
Wheat Crop 63
2. Relation of Cash to Future Contract 106
3. Trading Floor of the Chicago Board of Trade Facing page 121
4. Pit Broker's Trading Card 162
5. Customer's Confirmation of Purchase 163
6. Price Signals Used in Floor Trading 165
7. Diagram of the Course of a Trade in Futures 167
8. Customer's Account of Purchase and Sale 170
9. Customer's Monthly Statement 171
10. Warehouse Receipt for Grain 174
11. Warehouse Receipt for Cotton 175
12. Market Positions Set Up between Brokers and Customers as
a Result of a Transaction in Futures 186
13. Market Positions Set Up between Brokers as a Result of
Two Completed Transactions by Customers 187
14. Direct Settlement of 10,000 Bushels of May Corn Futures . . 190
15. Ring Settlement of 10,000 Bushels of May Cora Futures 191
16. Settlement by Transfer of 10,000 Bushels of May Corn Fu-
tures 192
17. Settlement by Warehouse Receipt or by Transferable Notice
of 10,000 Bushels of May Corn Futures 193
18. A Delivery or Transferable Notice Used in the Clearing of
Trades 194
19. Gearing Money Balances through the Use of a Settlement
Price 197
20. Confirmation Slip Used to Verify Oral Trades between Clear-
ing Members 204
21. Purchase and Sales Sheet Used in Clearing Trades 206
22. The Recapitulation Statement Used in Gearing Trades 208
23. Form Used to Call for an Additional Variation Margin 211
24. Street Book Used as Record of Inter-broker Transactions in
Futures 217
25. Steps Involved in Executing a Selling order in Futures 220
26. Illustration of a Demand Curve for Wheat 236
27. Dlustration of an Elastic and of an Inelastic Demand 237
28. Supply-Price Relationship for Oats 243
29. Supply-Price Relationship for Cotton 243
30. Supply-Price Relationship for Corn 244
31. Supply-Price Relationship for Wheat 244
32. Seasonal Variation in the Price of Four Commodities: Wheat,
Cotton, Oats, and Corn 248
xv
xvi CHARTS
Figure Page
33. Relation of Cash to Future Prices for Four Commodities for
the 10-year period October, 1920-September, 1930 255
34. The Seasonal Trend in No. 2 Hard Winter Wheat Prices, Chi-
cago, During Crop Year, 1928-1929 270
35. The Seasonal Trend in Cash Prices Relative to the Price of
Futures, for Wheat, Corn, Oats, and Cotton, Averaging 9
Crop Years, 1921-1930 272
36. Comparison of Spot Price of Middling Cotton at New York
and the Average Spot Price of Middling at New Orleans,
Memphis, Galveston and Houston with the Price of Future
Contracts for the Spot Month on the New York Cotton Ex-
change, Fridays, September, 1906-August, 1907 297
37. An Illustration of the Effect of a Relative Change in the Spot
Prices of Cotton 302
38. The Influence of Supplies of Corn in Store, Chicago, upon
the Relative Levels of Future Prices, 1921-1930 313
39. A Comparison of the Fluctuations in the Volume of Future
Trading in Wheat with the Fluctuations in Wheat Future
Prices, Chicago Board of Trade, by Months, for 6 years,
1924-1929 329
40. The Combined Position in Wheat Futures of 5 Leading Spec-
ulators Compared with the Price of Wheat Futures, Chicago
Board of Trade, by Days, for the Period April 30-December
31, 1926 333
41. The Net Position, All Wheat Futures Combined, of Each of
5 Leading Speculators, Chicago Board of Trade, by Days, for
the period April 30-December 31, 1926 337
42. The Combined Position in Wheat Futures of the Customers
of 15 Clearing Firms Compared with the Price of Wheat Fu-
tures, Chicago Board of Trade, by Days, for the period April
30-December 31, 1926 339
43. Illustration of the Shifting of Price Risk by Hedging 383
44. Reproduction of a "Call" Contract for Cotton 401
45. Changes in Spot Cotton Prices Relative to Future Prices, New
Orleans Cotton Exchange, by Weeks, for 9 Crop Years, 1921-
1930 408
46. The United States Visible Supply of Corn Compared with the
Combined Net Position of 67 Large Hedging Accounts, by
Weeks, for the period October, 1924-September, 1928 415
47. The Intra-annual Variability of Wheat Prices and of Cotton
Prices, 1867-1930 430
48. Diagram of Price Forecasting as of October 1, in which the
General Level of Prices is Shown as an Expression of Prob-
able Market Conditions a Few Weeks Hence, with Specific
Future and Spot Prices Adjusted to this General Level . . . . 440
PART ONE
certain ethical and social aspects to this subject. These will not
be considered beyond an occasional reference necessary to an
adequate understanding of some economic feature. By thus
limiting the field, a larger measure of consideration can be
given to the economic phases of the subject although it is clear
that in excluding the ethical-social problems the broadest pos-
sible appraisal of future trading cannot be made.
To know the nature of future trading in any thoroughgoing
fashion requires something more than a general consideration
of its operations and functions. At certain points it is essential
to study closely the detailed methods employed in order to ob-
tain an accurate estimate of what is accomplished. For this
reason our analysis and illustrations will be taken from only
two types of commodities: grain and cotton. In doing this, it
will be possible to build up for these two commodities a back-
ground of essential trade information which will greatly aid in
analyzing particular phases of the subject. It is in these two
commodities, also, that the practice of trading in futures has
been developed to the most advanced stage and in which by far
the major portion of the entire volume of futures is transacted.
In selecting these commodities, emphasis is being placed, and
properly so, upon the leaders in the field.
The Extent of Future Trading.—In the United States, fu-
ture trading had its origin just prior to the Civil War in grain
and pork products. Cotton followed in the latter part of the
sixties, coffee in 1882, cottonseed oil in 1904 and raw sugar in
1914. Since the World War, a long list of products has been
added including rubber, cocoa, eggs, butter, hides, silk, cotton-
seed and cottonseed meal, mill feeds, tin and copper. Classified
by commodities, the list includes at the present time (1931)
over twenty-five individual products; and the future markets
for these commodities also number more than twenty-five.
Their total volume of trading during the year 1929 amounted
to approximately 42 billion dollars.8
It is of interest to note in connection with the growth and
* See Table S at the end of Chap. Ill, pp. 54-55.
ECONOMIC POSITION OF FUTURE TRADING 9
1. D E V E L O P M E N T OF T H E A M E R I C A N G R A I N T R A D E
similar to these were also given for wheat and oats and other
grains though they were less frequent than those for corn.
In the issue of January 30, 1855, during the period of the
year when lake traffic was closed, we read: "In wheat there
is nothing doing; . . . in corn, there is something doing for
Spring delivery; a sale made today of 10,000 bu. is reported
at 50fS afloat, cash in hand, deliverable in April on 3 days' no-
tice." A few days later, February 7, 1855 the market reviewer
observes: "Closing contracts for Spring delivery of corn and
oats has served to lend something of animation to the grain
market but even in this department of business, so little has
been done in comparison with previous years at this part of
the season that we are compelled to call it very dull."
The quotations just given illustrate the practice of buying
and selling grain "to arrive," a type of trading well established
in the early fifties. Furthermore "to arrive" contracts were
used not only at Chicago but also to a limited extent at other
markets and notably those of Milwaukee, New York and St.
Louis. But it is on the Chicago market that this form of con-
tract first developed into the highly standardized future con-
tract and it is for this reason that this market merits special
consideration."
Speculation in "To Arrive" Contracts.—The "to arrive"
contract permitted of a wider and freer type of specula-
tion than dealing in the spot product and this fact was appar-
ently recognized by traders on the Chicago market at an early
date. We find frequent references to speculators and "opera-
tors" and usually they were buyers or sellers of some form
of contract permitting postponed fulfillment.
There were two underlying reasons for this preference. First,
the use of time contracts permitted a trader to operate profit-
ably for a fall in price as well as a rise. This was accomplished
by selling short a contract calling for delivery say three weeks
hence. If, in the interim between the date of contracting and
* See Second Annual Statement, Milwaukee Chamber of Commerce, p.
13. Also, especially, Taylor, Op. Cit., pp. 206-207.
22 FUTURE TRADING
the day when the supply of grain was actually acquired, the
price declined, the short-seller would profit by that amount. In
contrast, trades requiring the immediate delivery of grain of-
fered no opportunity to sell short. A speculator could buy grain
and hold for higher prices if the outlook appeared good; but
if he were "bearish" regarding the future, he could dispose of
his holdings to prevent loss but beyond that he was unable to
profitably act on his opinion.
It should be stated, in passing, that, for a time, short sell-
ing was also accomplished by borrowing warehouse receipts
for delivery on spot contracts, later returning to the lender
another receipt of the same grade which called for the same
amount of grain. By this means, the borrower of the receipt
realized a profit or sustained a loss amounting to the difference
between the price at the time of borrowing and at the time of
acquiring another receipt to be returned to the lender. This
is the method of selling short in general use on American stock
exchanges.
But it did not meet with favor in grain trading, for as early
as 1859 the Directors of the Chicago Board of Trade, accord-
ing to Taylor, resolved "that the custom which prevails among
certain warehousemen of lending grain which has been stored
with them by other parties, or in speculating in the same them-
selves, is prejudicial to the interests of the members of the as-
sociation, and exercises a false influence on the market, and
ought to be discountenanced by the Board." Three years later
there appears in the Fifth Annual Statement of the Board as
a part of the general regulations governing the grading of
grain, a provision condemning the practice; this was appar-
ently sufficient to discourage its use altogether. It remained
for short selling to be accomplished by the only other method
possible; that of trading in time contracts or those calling for
delivery at a date subsequent to the contract of sale.
"To arrive" contracts were preferred to spot contracts as a
speculative medium, secondly, because of their convenience. To
buy a cargo of grain to hold for higher prices involved the
EVOLUTION OF FUTURE TRADING: GRAIN 23
Inspector, with grades of "club," "No. 1," "No. 2 " and "re-
jected" for each class of wheat. Provision was also made for
tiie grading of corn, oats, rye, and barley under a three-fold
classification: "No. 1," "No. 2," and "Rejected." Later in the
year, minimum test weight per measured bushel was added as
a grading factor.
The following table has been prepared from data given in
the First Annual Report of the Chicago Board of Trade.
TABLE 3.—INSPECTIONS OF GRAIN INTO CHICAGO ELEVATORS,
JUNE 15-DECEMBER 31, 1858.
(In thousands of bushels, i.e., 000 omitted.)
GRADE
GRAIN Total
Club No. 1 No. 2 Rejected
Language: English
[SIXTH SERIES.]
JULY 1913.
I. ON THE CONSTITUTION OF
ATOMS AND MOLECULES.
By N. BOHR, Dr. phil. Copenhagen[1].
CONTENTS
Part I.—BINDING OF ELECTRONS BY POSITIVE NUCLEI.
Part II.—SYSTEMS CONTAINING ONLY A SINGLE NUCLEUS
Part III.—SYSTEMS CONTAINING SEVERAL NUCLEI
Introduction.
Further, it can easily be shown that the mean value of the kinetic
energy of the electron taken for a whole revolution is equal to . We
see that if the value of is not given, there will be no values of
and characteristic for the system in question.
Let us now, however, take the effect of the energy radiation into
account, calculated in the ordinary way from the acceleration of the
electron. In this case the electron will no longer describe stationary
orbits. will continuously increase, and the electron will approach
the nucleus describing orbits of smaller and smaller dimensions, and
with greater and greater frequency; the electron on the average
gaining in kinetic energy at the same time as the whole system loses
energy. This process will go on until the dimensions of the orbit are of
the same order of magnitude as the dimensions of the electron or
those of the nucleus. A simple calculation shows that the energy
radiated out during the process considered will be enormously great
compared with that radiated out by ordinary molecular processes.
It is obvious that the behaviour of such a system will be very
different from that of an atomic system occurring in nature. In the first
place, the actual atoms in their permanent state seem to have
absolutely fixed dimensions and frequencies. Further, if we consider
any molecular process, the result seems always to be that after a
certain amount of energy characteristic for the systems in question is
radiated out, the systems will again settle down in a stable state of
equilibrium, in which the distances apart of the particles are of the
same order of magnitude as before the process.
Now the essential point in Planck’s theory of radiation is that the
energy radiation from an atomic system does not take place in the
continuous way assumed in the ordinary electrodynamics, but that it,
on the contrary, takes place in distinctly separated emissions, the
amount of energy radiated out from an atomic vibrator of frequency
in a single emission being equal to , where is an entire number,
and is a universal constant[6].
Returning to the simple case of an electron and a positive nucleus
considered above, let us assume that the electron at the beginning of
the interaction with the nucleus was at a great distance apart from the
nucleus, and had no sensible velocity relative to the latter. Let us
further assume that the electron after the interaction has taken place
has settled down in a stationary orbit around the nucleus. We shall,
for reasons referred to later, assume that the orbit in question is
circular; this assumption will, however, make no alteration in the
calculations for systems containing only a single electron.
Let us now assume that, during the binding of the electron, a
homogeneous radiation is emitted of a frequency , equal to half the
frequency of revolution of the electron in its final orbit; then, from
Planck's theory, we might expect that the amount of energy emitted
by the process considered is equal to , where is Planck’s
constant and an entire number. If we assume that the radiation
emitted is homogeneous, the second assumption concerning the
frequency of the radiation suggests itself, since the frequency of
revolution of the electron at the beginning of the emission is . The
question, however, of the rigorous validity of both assumptions, and
also of the application made of Planck’s theory, will be more closely
discussed in §3.
Putting
We see that this expression accounts for the law connecting the
lines in the spectrum of hydrogen. If we put and let vary,
we get the ordinary Balmer series. If we put , we get the series
in the ultra-red observed by Paschen[11] and previously suspected by
Ritz. If we put and , we get series respectively
in the extreme ultra-violet and the extreme ultra-red, which are not
observed, but the existence of which may be expected.
The agreement in question is quantitative as well as qualitative.
Putting
we get
The observed value for the factor outside the bracket in the formula
(4) is
the bracket in the formula (4) for the spectrum of hydrogen. The
different series appear if we put , or , equal to a fixed number
and let the other vary.
The circumstance that the frequency can be written as a
difference between two functions of entire numbers suggests an
origin of the lines in the spectra in question similar to the one we have
assumed for hydrogen; i. e. that the lines correspond to a radiation
emitted during the passing of the system between two different
stationary states. For systems containing more than one electron the
detailed discussion may be very complicated, as there will be many
different configurations of the electrons which can be taken into
consideration as stationary states. This may account for the different
sets of series in the line spectra emitted from the substances in
question. Here I shall only try to show how, by help of the theory, it
can be simply explained that the constant entering in Rydberg’s
formula is the same for all substances.
Let us assume that the spectrum in question corresponds to the
radiation emitted during the binding of an electron; and let us further
assume that the system including the electron considered is neutral.
The force on the electron, when at a great distance apart from the
nucleus and the electrons previously bound, will be very nearly the
same as in the above case of the binding of an electron by a
hydrogen nucleus. The energy corresponding to one of the stationary
states will therefore for great be very nearly equal to that given by
the expression (3) on p. 5, if we put . For great we
consequently get