Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Gravitational Waves Vol 2 Astrophysics and Cosmology Michele Maggiore Online Ebook Texxtbook Full Chapter PDF
Gravitational Waves Vol 2 Astrophysics and Cosmology Michele Maggiore Online Ebook Texxtbook Full Chapter PDF
https://ebookmeta.com/product/primary-mathematics-3a-hoerst/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/modern-general-relativity-black-
holes-gravitational-waves-and-cosmology-1st-edition-mike-guidry/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/physics-
galaxy-2020-21-vol-3a-electrostatics-current-
electricity-2e-2021st-edition-ashish-arora/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/understanding-gravitational-waves-
astronomers-universe-1st-edition-kitchin/
A Modern Introduction to Classical Electrodynamics 1st
Edition Michele Maggiore
https://ebookmeta.com/product/a-modern-introduction-to-classical-
electrodynamics-1st-edition-michele-maggiore/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/physics-of-gravitational-waves-
sources-and-detection-methods-1st-edition-arun-kenath/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/physics-
galaxy-2020-21-vol-2-thermodynamics-oscillations-waves-2e-2021st-
edition-ashish-arora/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/horimiya-vol-2-daisuke-hagiwara/
Volume 2
Astrophysics and Cosmology
Michele Maggiore
Département de Physique Théorique
Université de Genève
3
3
Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX2 6DP,
United Kingdom
Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford.
It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship,
and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of
Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries
© Michele Maggiore 2018
The moral rights of the author have been asserted
First Edition published in 2018
Impression: 1
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in
a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the
prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted
by law, by licence or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics
rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the
above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the
address above
You must not circulate this work in any other form
and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer
Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press
198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America
British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
Data available
Library of Congress Control Number: 2017943894
Set ISBN 978–0–19–875528–9
Volume 1 978–0–19–857074–5
Volume 2 978–0–19–857089–9
only available as part of a set
DOI 10.1093/oso/9780198570899.001
Printed and bound by
CPI Litho (UK) Ltd, Croydon, CR0 4YY
Links to third party websites are provided by Oxford in good faith and
for information only. Oxford disclaims any responsibility for the materials
contained in any third party website referenced in this work.
Contents
11 Neutron stars 74
11.1 Observations of neutron stars 74
11.1.1 The discovery of pulsars 74
11.1.2 Pulsar spindown and the P − Ṗ plane 75
11.1.3 Millisecond pulsars 80
11.1.4 Pulsar demography 81
11.1.5 SGRs and magnetars 83
11.2 GW emission from neutron stars 89
11.2.1 NS normal modes 89
11.2.2 The CFS instability 99
11.2.3 GWs from post-merger NS remnants 106
11.2.4 GWs from deformed rotating NS 108
Further reading 111
vi Contents
Bibliography 744
Index 815
Preface to Volume 2
The first volume of this book dealt with the theory of GWs, in Part I,
and with experiments, in Part II. This second volume is devoted to
what we can learn from GWs, in astrophysics (Part III) and in cosmol-
ogy (Part IV). Our main aim has been to systematize a large body of
theoretical and observational developments that have taken place in GW
physics over the last few decades. Even though we expect the field to
evolve rapidly, thanks to new experimental discoveries as well as to the-
oretical advances, we believe that most of these methods will still form
the backbone of our understanding for many years to come, and will be
xiv
the basis for future developments. As with Vol. 1, we have typically tried
to rederive afresh all theoretical results, trying to give a coherent and
consistent picture of the field, and clarifying or streamlining the existing
derivations whenever possible. An Errrata web page will be maintained
at http://theory.physics.unige.ch/˜maggiore/home.html
Various people have read and commented on the drafts of some chap-
ters. I am particularly grateful to Alessandra Buonanno, Emanuele
Berti, Thibault Damour, Ruth Durrer, Valeria Ferrari, Stefano Foffa,
Kostas Kokkotas, Michael Kramer, Martin Kunz, Georges Meynet, An-
drea Passamonti, Eric Poisson, Luciano Rezzolla, Alberto Sesana and
Riccardo Sturani, for their careful reading of selected chapters, and to
Camille Bonvin, Daniela Doneva, Alex Kehagias and Vittorio Tansella
for useful comments.
I also wish to thank Sonke Adlung, Harriet Konishi and the staff of
Oxford University Press for their competent and friendly help, and Mac
Clarke for the careful and competent copyediting.
Astrophysical sources of
gravitational waves
Stellar collapse
10
We begin our study of astrophysical sources of gravitational waves (GWs)
10.1 Historical Supernovae 4
with a chapter devoted to stellar collapse. From the point of view of GW
physics, this is interesting for at least two different reasons. First, stel- 10.2 Properties of Supernovae 10
lar collapse through supernova explosion is itself a potentially interesting 10.3 The dynamics of core
collapse 21
source of GW production. Second, stellar collapse can leave as remnant
10.4 GW production by
a compact object, such as a white dwarf (WD), a neutron star (NS) or self-gravitating fluids 35
a stellar-mass black hole (BH). As we will see in detail in later chapters,
10.5 GWs from stellar collapse 46
these compact objects are among the most interesting sources from the
10.6 Complements 66
point of view of GW astrophysics.
Supernovae (SNe) are among the most spectacular events in the Uni-
verse. As we will discuss in detail in this chapter, there are two very
different mechanisms leading to SN explosions: (1) The gravitational
collapse of the core of a star, once the nuclear fuel that feeds the ther-
monuclear reactions inside the core is exhausted. As we will see in Sec-
tion 10.2.1, depending on the properties of the progenitor, this leads to
events classified as type Ib, Ic or type II SNe, and leaves behind a com-
pact remnant, usually a neutron star (which is sometimes observable as a
pulsar) or possibly a black hole (BH).1 (2) The thermonuclear explosion 1
There are also other mechanisms that
of a white dwarf that accretes mass from a companion, going beyond its can trigger the explosion, as in electron-
capture SNe, as well as a more refined
Chandrasekhar limit. This gives rise to type Ia SNe. In this case the classification of SN type, as we will dis-
star that explodes is dispersed in space and its remnant is not a compact cuss in more detail later in the chapter.
object. A typical core-collapse SN can release an energy ∼ 1053 erg. Of It is also in principle possible that the
this energy, 99% is emitted in neutrinos, about 1% goes into kinetic en- collapse produces no visible SN event
and all the matter is swallowed by the
ergy of the ejected material, and less than 0.01%, i.e. about 1049 erg, is final BH.
released in photons. The corresponding peak luminosity in photons can
be of order a few times 109 L or higher. Thus, a typical core-collapse
SN at its peak has an optical luminosity that rivals the cumulative light
emitted by all the stars in its host galaxy. As we will see in detail in this
chapter, type Ia SNe have similar electromagnetic luminosities. Such
events, when they take place in our Galaxy (barring obscuration from
dust in the Galactic plane beyond a few kpc), can lead to truly impres-
sive optical displays that have been observed by mankind since ancient
times. A number of milestones in astronomy are associated with nearby
SN explosions. Tycho’s SN in 1572 and Kepler’s in 1604 marked a new
epoch in astronomy, while recent discoveries such as the pulsar in the
remnant of the 1054 Crab SN and the detection of neutrinos from the
1987A SN in the nearby Large Magellanic Cloud rank among the mile-
stones of modern astronomy. We therefore find it appropriate to begin
this chapter with an introduction to historical SNe.
Table 10.1 Summary of the historical SNe, and the source of their records, adapted
from Green and Stephenson (2003). Remnants updated from Ferrand and Safi-Harb
(2012). (The identifier of the remnants, as for example in G120.1+01.4, refers to its
Galactic coordinates). We have classified SN 1604 as type Ia, following for example
Blair et al. (2007), Reynolds et al. (2007) and references therein. The nature of the
Crab SN (core collapse or electron capture) is debated; see the Further Reading.
the region between α and β Cen suggests that the remnant of SN 185
could be identified with the SN remnant RCW 86 (G315.4−02.3), at an
estimated distance of about 2.8 kpc. Recent observations with Chandra
and XMM-Newton have indeed strengthened the case for this identifica-
tion. The study of its X-ray synchrotron emission has in fact suggested
an estimate for the age of this remnant consistent with the explosion
date, within the uncertainties of the determination. The regular shape
of the remnant shell, together with the absence of a pulsar, would point
toward a type Ia SN, which is also suggested by the Chandra X-ray
observations.
Another possible remnant candidate has been proposed, G320.4−01.2
(RCW 89), which contains the pulsar PSR B1509-58, and therefore
would corresponds to a core-collapse SN. The timing measurement of
this pulsar are also consistent with the age of SN 185.
SN 1006
The next SN visible to the naked eye appeared after about four centuries,
in AD 1572, in the direction of the constellation of Cassiopea, and was
observed in Asia and Europe. The SN was probably first detected in
Europe on November 6 (or possibly a few days earlier) by the abbot of
Messina and by other observers in Europe. Very detailed observations
of it were made by the Danish astronomer Tycho Brahe, who realized
that it was a new star and begun observing it on November 11.
He carefully followed it over the following year, establishing that its
position was fixed, and determining it to within a few arcminutes. He
was also the only astronomer to monitor carefully the decline of its
brightness in the following months. This SN is thus often referred to
as Tycho’s SN.5 It remained visible for 18 months. The fact that its 5
As Tycho reports, “On the 11th day
position remained fixed, without a daily parallax with respect to the of November in the evening after sun-
set, I was contemplating the stars in a
fixed stars, allowed Brahe to infer that the object was far beyond the clear sky. I noticed that a new and un-
Moon; furthermore, the absence of apparent proper motion over a period usual star, surpassing the other stars in
of months showed him that it was much further away than the planets, brilliancy, was shining almost directly
and was indeed a star. This was a highly non-trivial conclusion for above my head; and since I had, from
boyhood, known all the stars of the
the epoch, which contradicted the accepted Aristotelian doctrine that heavens perfectly, it was quite evident
changes in the sky could only take place in the sublunar region, and to me that there had never been any
ultimately led to the notion of the immutability of the heavens being star in that place of the sky, even the
abandoned. It also opened the way to modern astronomy, revealing the smallest, to say nothing of a star so con-
spicuous and bright as this. I was so
importance of performing accurate astrometric measurements. astonished of this sight that I was not
Chinese observers recorded that it was visible in daylight, while Ko- ashamed to doubt the trustworthiness
rean documents compared its brightness with that of Venus. This sug- of my own eyes. But when I observed
gests that at its maximum the SN was brighter than the threshold that others, on having the place pointed
out to them, could see that there was
V −4 for visibility during daylight, but not by much. The remnant is really a star there, I had no further
identified with the radio and X-ray source 3C10 (G120.1+01.4).6 Today doubts. A miracle indeed, one that has
the remnant is a shell of angular diameter 8 arcmin (by comparison, the never been previously seen before our
time, in any age since the beginning of
full Moon has an angular diameter between approximately 29 and 34
the world.” (From Burnham, 1978).
arcmin, depending on its exact distance from Earth along its orbit).
Historical records of the light curve suggest a type Ia SN. No compact
remnant has been detected at its center, which also points toward a 6
Beautiful images of this and
type Ia SN. Finally, the classification as type Ia has been beautifully other SN remnants in X-rays
confirmed thanks to the detection of a light echo from the SN, due to have been taken by Chandra, see
scattering and absorption/re-emission of the SN flash by interstellar dust http://chandra.harvard.edu/photo/2011
/tycho/
near the remnant. In this way it has been possible to observe some of
the light emitted by the SN near maximum brightness, which has arrived
more than four centuries after the direct flash, and it has been possible
to perform a spectroscopic analysis. The spectrum has confirmed that
SN 1572 was a typical type Ia SN. Its distance from us has usually
been quoted in the range 2.3 − 2.8 kpc, although the absolute brightness
inferred from the light echo, together with the historical information
that it had V −4, rather gives a distance 3.8+1.5
−1.1 kpc.
A search for the companion star from which the white dwarf accreted
mass, going beyond the Chandrasekhar limit, has revealed a G2 star
in the direction of the center of the nebula, and at a distance between
8 Stellar collapse
2.5 and 4.0 kpc, so compatible with the distance to the nebula. This
star has a peculiar phase-space velocity, more than three times as large
as that of any other star in this region, which could be interpreted as
arising from the kick received by the companion in the explosion. Other
interpretations, in terms of a star unrelated to the SN and belonging to
the thick disk population, are, however, possible.
high above the Galactic plane, at a vertical height z 590 (d/5 kpc) pc,
where d is its distance from us.
The classification of this SN has been controversial for decades. Baade
suggested that the historical light curve was consistent with a type Ia,
but his claim was later questioned. The presence of dense circum-
stellar material implies significant mass loss from the precursor star,
which is more suggestive of a core-collapse SN (although there are a few
examples of circumstellar material around spectroscopically confirmed
type Ia SNe). Since the 1990s, however, evidence accumulated in favor
of a type Ia SN. Analyses of X-ray spectra with Exosat, ASCA, XMM-
Newton and, more recently, Chandra indicate an overabundance of Fe
and Si in the ejecta and relatively little oxygen emission. Such a com-
position is inconsistent with a core-collapse SN, and is instead typical of
a type Ia SN. Furthermore, no neutron star has been detected near its
center, either in radio or in X-rays. In X-rays, the limit on the flux from
a hypothetical central compact object shows that, if it were present,
its intrinsic X-ray luminosity would be more than 100 times smaller
than that of the compact remnant of a typical core-collapse SN such as
Cas A. Infrared studies with Spitzer point again toward the conclusion
that this was a type Ia SN, although with significant circumstellar ma-
terial. Recent hydrodynamical simulations show that the morphology
of the remnant and its expansion characteristics can be reproduced by
a model of a type Ia SN originating from a white dwarf that accreted
mass by wind accretion from an asymptotic giant branch star with mass
(4 − 5)M .
7 SNe in Table 10.1 for which convincing historical records exist, we can
estimate that about 10 − 20% of the galactic SNe exploding in the last
2000 years have been recorded in writing.
Among the known Galactic SN remnants, the record for the youngest
is currently held by G001.9+00.3. This remnant is located in the direc-
tion of the Galactic center, at a distance from the center of about 300 pc
in projection. From its expansion rate, assuming no deceleration, the
explosion date is estimated as the year 1855 ± 11. Since some decelera-
tion must have occurred, this is actually an upper bound on its age, and
8
Needless to say, by this we mean that the explosion date was most likely around 1900.8 The remnant was first
the signal from the SN reached Earth observed by VLA (Very Large Array) radio observations, and in X-rays
around 1900. The actual explosion took
place about 25,000 yrs ago, given the
by Chandra.
time taken by light to reach us from the
Galactic center. The same applies to all
the other SN explosion dates mentioned
above. 10.2 Properties of Supernovae
Modern research on SNe began in 1885 when Hartwig discovered the
first extragalactic SN, in the Andromeda galaxy. It was first interpreted
as a nova. However, when in 1919 Lundmark estimated the distance to
Andromeda, it became clear that Hartwig’s “nova” had actually been
9
Or, the other way around, Shapley O(103 ) times brighter than a classical nova.9 However, it was only with
in 1919 used this SN as an argument the pioneering paper by Baade and Zwicky in 1933 that the notion of SNe
against the island universe hypothesis
(i.e. the existence of other galaxies,
was put forward and a first clear distinction was made between novae
separated from ours by huge distances), and supernovae. In 1933, just one year after Chadwick’s discovery of the
arguing that SN 1885A in Andromeda neutron, Baade and Zwicky put forward the idea of a neutron star10 and
would have M = −16, which was “out further speculated that SNe are an end-state of stellar evolution, with
of the question”. The typical abso-
lute magnitude of most novae is around
the source of energy being provided by the gravitational energy released
−8.8. by the collapse of the progenitor star to a neutron star.11
10
Actually, even before the discovery of In the following years systematic searches, performed particularly by
the neutron, in 1931, neutron stars were Zwicky at Palomar Mountain, led to the discovery of 54 SNe up to 1956,
somewhat anticipated by Lev Landau, and 82 more from 1956 to 1963. In recent years, largely stimulated by
who wrote about stars where “atomic the importance of type Ia SNe for determining the expansion rate of
nuclei come in close contact, forming
one gigantic nucleus”. the Universe, intensive searches have dramatically increased the number
11 of detected SNe. Browsing the Asiago Supernova Catalog12 one finds
“With all reserve we advance the
view that supernovae represent the that in the period 1980–1989 were observed O(200) SNe, in the period
transition from ordinary stars into neu- 1990–1999 were found over 900 SNe, and in the period 2000–2009 were
tron stars, which in their final stages observed O(3500) SNe, obviously all of them extragalactic. As of 2017
consist of closely packed neutrons”, the total number of SNe in the catalog is about 9000, and is increasing at
W. Baade and F. Zwicky, Meeting of
the American Physical Society, Decem- a rate of about two SNe per day. This large sample, combined with the
ber 1933, published in Phys. Rev. 45 improved quality of the observations, has allowed remarkable progress
(1934) 138. in our understanding of the properties of SNe. Future large synoptic
12
See http://graspa.oapd.inaf.it/ surveys are expected to detect possibly O(105 ) SNe per year, at redshifts
asnc.html for an on-line version. z ∼ 0.5 − 1.
Much progress has also been made in recent years in identifying the
progenitor stars of local SN explosions, by comparisons with archival
data from HST or ground-based telescopes. Currently O(20) progenitors
have been identified. To draw statistical conclusions from this sample,
most of the information comes from progenitors at a distance below
10.2 Properties of Supernovae 11
Ia
Ib
II
Fig. 10.2 Left panel: Spectra of basic SN types near maximum luminosity. Type II
are defined by a clear signature of Hα. Type Ia is defined by a lack of H lines and
a strong Si II absorption at about 6150 Å. Type Ib/c lack both H and Si lines, but
type Ib has He lines, which are not present in type Ic. Ten months later (right panel)
SN Ia show strong emissions of [FeII] and [FeIII], SN Ib/c are dominated by [CaII]
and [OI]. These same lines plus strong Hα emission are typical of SN II at late times.
From Cappellaro and Turatto (2001).
type Ib and type Ic SNe. Neither type shows H or Si lines near maximum
H lines ?
luminosity. However, near maximum luminosity, type Ib SNe show He
no yes lines, while type Ic SNe have neither H nor He lines. At late time, the
spectra of type Ib and type Ic become very similar, indicating that the
Si II lines ? plateau ? distinction among Ib and Ic (sometimes collectively denoted as Ibc) is
less fundamental than the distinction between type Ia and type Ibc.
yes no no yes
Type II SNe are defined by the fact that they show prominent H lines
He lines ? in the spectrum taken near maximum luminosity. They are further di-
no yes vided into two classes, depending not on further spectral features, but
II b rather on the decline with time of their light curves. Those that, after
Ia Ic Ib II L II P reaching maximum luminosity, show a plateau of almost constant lumi-
thermonuclear core collapse nosity for about 2–3 months are called II-P, while those that show a
explosion small large
envelope
decline approximately linear in magnitude (and exponential in luminos-
ity, recalling that the magnitude is obtained from the logarithm of the
Fig. 10.3 A decision tree for the luminosity; see the Complement Section 10.6) are called II-L. A compar-
classification of SNe, based on spec- ison between the spectra of type Ia, Ib and II SNe, both at maximum
tral features near maximum light luminosity (left panel) and after 10 months (right panel), is shown in
and, for type II SNe, on the tem-
Fig. 10.2. A decision tree based on these criteria is shown in Fig. 10.3.
poral evolution of the light curve.
The separation into type I and type II, however, does not really reflect
the underlying explosion mechanisms. Rather, type Ia SN are believed
10.2 Properties of Supernovae 13
by the half-life of the dominant process. Thus in this stage log L, and
hence the negative of the apparent magnitude, decreases linearly.
Type II-L supernovae are due to the core collapse of stars with an H
envelope of about 1−2 M . In this case, because of the smaller envelope
mass, the velocity of expansion of the H-rich envelope is larger, and the
SN enters directly into the phase dominated by radioactive decays, with
little or no plateau, and a linear decrease of the magnitude. Intermediate
cases exist between typical type II-P and typical type II-L supernovae,
depending on the size of the H envelope.
In the phase powered by radioactive decays an important role is played
by 56 Ni, which is the main product of burning at nuclear statistical equi-
librium in the conditions of temperature and density typically present
in SNe. In particular, 56 Ni produces 56 Co through electron capture
56
Ni + e− → 56
Co + νe + γ , (10.1)
with a half life of 6.1 days, emitting photons with energies of 750, 812 and
158 keV. The main source of luminosity later becomes the radioactive
decay of 56 Co to 56 Fe, which goes mostly through electron capture (81%)
56
Co + e− → 56
Fe + νe + γ , (10.2)
of the stars, given that the optical depth of the ejecta at that time is
high. After 10 months we are instead receiving light free-streaming from
deeper regions of the ejecta, and we find that type Ib and type II SNe
now look very similar. The natural interpretation of these facts is that
type Ib SNe are the result of the core collapse of stars that have lost their
H envelope, because of stellar winds or interaction with a companion.
This explains the lack of H lines, which instead dominate the spectrum at
maximum luminosity in type II SNe, and the similarity of the spectra at
later times. This interpretation is further supported by the existence of
cases intermediate between type Ib and type II; the missing link was first
provided by SN 1993J, whose spectrum evolved from that of a type II to
type Ib in just a few weeks. This is interpreted as the result of the core
collapse of a star whose H envelope had a rather small mass, of about
0.2 M . There are other examples of this type, so SNe that quickly
evolve from type II to type Ib are sometimes classified as members of a
new class, called type IIb. In Fig. 10.3 we represent this class with an
arrow connecting type II-L with type Ib.
Type Ic SNe also fit well in this scheme. Again their spectrum at late
time is the same as that of type Ib and type II, showing that they are
core-collapse SNe. The lack of both H and He lines can be understood on
recalling that a massive star, during its lifetime, goes through different
stages of nuclear burning, which results in a onion-like structure. In
particular, the most external layers of the star consist of a H envelope,
on top of a He envelope. Type Ic events are then naturally interpreted
as the core collapse of stars that have lost both their H and their He
envelopes.16 16
Likely type Ic have some Helium too
Type Ib, Ic and II SN are then collectively denoted as core-collapse in their outer layer, but this helium pro-
duces no line due to the lack of favor-
SNe, and can be thought as a sequence Ic–Ib–IIb–IIL–IIP, from smaller able physical conditions, see Dessart,
to larger H and He envelopes. Type Ic, Ib and IIb SNe are also collec- Hillier, Li and Woosley (2012).
tively called “stripped-envelope SNe”. An interesting subclass of type Ic
SNe, denoted type Ic-BL (for “broad-line”) consists of type Ic SNe with
unusually broad absorption lines, and photospheric velocities in excess
of 20,000 km/s.
The difference between core-collapse and type Ia SNe is further high-
lighted by the fact that core-collapse SNe have only been observed in
spiral galaxies, near sites of recent star formation. This again indicates
that their progenitors are massive short-lived stars. Type Ia SNe, in
contrast, have been observed both in spiral and in elliptical galaxies.
The latter show little or no sign of recent star formation, showing that
type Ia SNe are not related to massive stars, since these have a short
life-time. Rather, their progenitors must be low-mass stars.
10.2.2 Luminosities
Luminosity of Type Ia SNe
The thermonuclear explosion of type Ia SNe takes place when the mass
of the WD goes beyond a fixed threshold, given by the Chandrasekhar
mass. As a result, their intrinsic luminosity, to a first approximation, is
16 Stellar collapse
Fig. 10.4 Comparison of the absolute R-band light curve of various SNe. The
curve labeled SN 1998dh is a typical SN Ia. All other curves represent core-
collapse SNe, except possibly the most luminous SN 2006gy, which could be
a pair-instability SN. From Smith et al. (2007).
10.2.3 Rates
For the purposes of direct observation with GW detectors we are par-
ticularly interested in the rate of SNe in our Galaxy (although ‘third-
generation’ GW interferometers such as the Einstein Telescope could
detect SNe at extragalactic distances, and SNe at cosmological dis-
tances are also potentially interesting sources of stochastic backgrounds
of GWs). However, most information on SN rates comes from observa-
tions of SNe in other galaxies. To translate the information obtained
from other galaxies into predictions for the SN rate in our Galaxy, the
rates must be normalized to some quantity correlated to the stellar mass
of the galaxy. The most commonly used quantity is the B-band lumi-
nosity of the galaxy in question, which is a measure of the stellar mass
of the galaxy, at least for galaxies of the same morphological type. The
classical units is the SNu (SN unit in B-band), defined as the number of
SN events per century, per 1010 LB, , where LB, is the solar luminosity
in the B-band. When one wishes to emphasize that the normalization
has been performed to the B-band luminosity, this unit is also denoted
by SNuB. Another useful normalization is to the far-infrared (FIR) band
luminosity, and the corresponding unit is denoted by SNuIR. Its useful-
ness is that the FIR luminosity of a galaxy is generated by dust heated
by massive stars and is therefore proportional to the star formation rate.
To transform from SNu to rates in our Galaxy we need its B-band lu-
minosity, which is
LB,Gal 2.3 × 1010 LB, , (10.8)
so the rate of supernova explosion in our Galaxy, expressed in terms of
the SNu unit, is about 2.3 SNu. Recent determination of the SN rates
using the existing databases of extragalactic SNe, for the different types
of SNe and for different classes of host galaxies, are shown in Table 10.2.
10.2 Properties of Supernovae 19
Table 10.2 The local SN rates, per galaxy type, in SNu. As usual, h0 =
H0 /(100 km s−1 Mpc−1 ). From Cappellaro and Turatto (2001).
Galaxy SN type
type Ia Ib/c II All
E-S0 0.32 ± .11 h20 < 0.02 h20 < 0.04 h20 0.32 ± .11 h20
S0a-Sb 0.32 ± .12 h20 0.20 ± .11 h20 0.75 ± .34 h20 1.28 ± .37 h20
Sbc-Sd 0.37 ± .14 h20 0.25 ± .12 h20 1.53 ± .62 h20 2.15 ± .66 h20
All 0.36 ± .11 h20 0.14 ± .07 h20 0.71 ± .34 h20 1.21 ± .36 h20
and
RG (type Ia) = (0.5 ± 0.2) events/century . (10.10) Probability of Milky Way SN
100%
Thus, overall we get 80%
1/Century
2/Century
3/Century
60% 5/Century
RG (all) = (2.2 ± 1.2) events/century , (10.11)
40%
i.e. approximately between one and three Galactic SNe per century. 20%
This rate would imply that there should be about 44 ± 24 SN remnants 0%
Next 10 Years Next 20 Years Next 30 Years
in our Galaxy younger than 2000 years, which is consistent with the
O(20 − 30) that are presently known; see the discussion on page 9. Fig. 10.5 Probabilities for one or
Somewhat higher rates are predicted using the five historical SNe ob- more SNe in the Galaxy over dif-
served in the last 1000 yr, and generating with a Monte Carlo simula- ferent time spans, depending on the
tion a number of SN events distributed in the Galaxy, to see how many assumed SN rate. From Kistler,
events are necessary in order to have five events with apparent magni- Yuksel, Ando, Beacom and Suzuki
tude mV < 0. Using a realistic model of the Galaxy, which includes the (2011).
thin and thick disks as well as the stellar halo, plus a realistic distribu-
tion of dust to compute the extinction, one finds that about 39 events
would be needed to produce the five visible historical SNe in the last
1000 yr, corresponding to a rate21 21
See Tammann, Loeffler and Schroder
(1994).
RG (all) = (3.9 ± 1.7) events/century . (10.12)
This is higher than the value given in eq. (10.11), but consistent within
the errors, especially in view of the uncertainties in the modelization
used and of the low statistics of historical SNe.
20 Stellar collapse
A direct estimate of the rate of core-collapse SNe in our Galaxy is ob-
tained from the γ-rays produced by the radioactive decay of 26 Al. It
can be shown that a substantial fraction of 26 Al is of Galactic origin.
The present-day equilibrium mass in 26 Al produced by ongoing nucle-
osynthesis throughout the Galaxy can be estimated from this γ-ray flux,
making some assumptions on its three-dimensional spatial distribution.
Fig. 10.6 The probability distribu-
Since 26 Al is mostly produced by massive stars, from this one can infer
tion for explosion of a Galactic
that the rate of core-collapse SNe in the Galaxy is equal to22
SN as a function of the distance
from Earth, in kpc. From Ahlers,
RG (type Ib + Ic + II) = (1.9 ± 1.1) events/century , (10.14)
Mertsch and Sarkar (2009).
in excellent agreement with eq. (10.9). Given a rate, the corresponding
prediction for the probability of observing at least one galactic event
7
during a given time-span is given by the Poisson distribution for that
M81,M82
NGC 253
M83
NGC 6946
Andromeda, M33
MW
rate. These probabilities are shown in Fig. 10.5 for different choices of
Supernovae per decade (1999-2008)
6
2008iz the rate, ranging from 1 event per century up to a 5 per century, and
5
2008bk 2008ax for different time spans.
4
2005af 2005cs
Beside the rate of Galactic SNe, another relevant issue, particularly for
3
2004dj 2008S 2003gd 2005at 2008?
GW astronomy, is what is the distribution of distances from the Earth
2
2004am 2004et 2002bu 1999gi 2007gr
at which we can expect such events. This question can be addressed
1 NGC
2002hh1999gq 2002ap 1999em1999ev
by performing a Monte Carlo calculation with a large number of sources
300-T 2002kg
core-collapse SN rate. This is due to the fact that different galaxies can Combined
RSND yr1
have different dust obscuration in the B-band, and that B-band light 0.9
that all the 22 SNe observed in this period were core-collapse SNe. This
5Mt 90
5Mt 10
HK 10
HK 90
sets a bound on the ratio of type Ia to core-collapse events in the local 0
0 2 4 6 8 10
Distance Mpc
universe of order 0.2 (at 90% c.l.). The same information is shown, in
terms of the cumulative core-collapse SN rate as a function of distance,
Fig. 10.8 The cumulative rate of
in Fig. 10.8.
core-collapse supernovae in the
The rate of core-collapse SNe at even larger distances is shown in the
nearby universe, based on that ex-
top panel of Fig. 10.9 (denoted there by RCCSN ). On the left side of the pected from 22 supernovae observed
figure the rate is plotted against the distance (in Mpc), while beyond in 1999–2008, compared with the
z = 0.1 the rate is shown against the redshift. Since massive stars are theoretical prediction using B-band
short-lived, the rate of core-collapse SNe should follow the star formation emission from 451 galaxies (dashed),
rate. The central solid line gives the prediction obtained using a fiducial UV emission from 315 galaxies (dot-
cosmic star formation history, with the upper and lower lines giving the ted), and the 589 galaxies of the
uncertainty range of the theoretical model. The bottom panel shows the combined catalog (solid). The ver-
ratio of type Ia to core-collapse events. In the local region we have an tical bands corresponds to the reach
upper bound (shown by the lines at 90% and 99% c.l.), coming from of different possible neutrino detec-
tors. From Kistler, Haxton and
the fact that the 22 SNe observed in the local region in 1999–2008, and
Yüksel (2013).
shown in Fig. 10.7, were all core-collapse SNe. At cosmological distances
this ratio takes values between 0.2 and 0.4, consistent with the values
reported in Table 10.2.
-3
10 Dahlen et al. (2008)
-4
10
The evolution of a massive star is governed by the competition between Cappellaro et al. (1999)
Dahlen et al. (2004)
the gravitational contraction under its own gravity, on the one hand, and Cappellaro et al. (2005)
Botticella et al. (2008)
the pressure exerted by the radiation, by the thermal gas and, in the 1
Ia/CC ratio
10 100
99%
late stages of its evolution, by the partially degenerate electron gas, on 90%
the other. Energy is lost mainly to radiation during the core H- and He- 0.1
10 100 0.5 1
burning phases, and to neutrino emission afterwards, and this energy is distance D [Mpc] redshift z
provided by the thermonuclear reactions taking place in the inner parts
of the star. These reactions are very sensitive to the temperature in Fig. 10.9 Evolution of the core-
the core. High temperatures are necessary to overcome the Coulomb collapse supernova rate (top panel)
repulsion of the positively charged nuclei and bring them close enough. and the ratio of Type Ia to core-
At that point the attractive part of the short-range strong force between collapse SNe (bottom panel). From
nucleons can take over and create a bound nuclear state. The higher Horiuchi, Beacom and Dwek (2009).
the electric charge of the nuclei, the higher is the Coulomb barrier to
be overcome. When a protostellar cloud collapses under its own self-
22 Stellar collapse
gravity, the first thermonuclear reaction that can ignite is the fusion of
deuteron and proton to give 3 He, D + p → 3 He + γ, and afterwards the
fusion of protons into 2 He nuclei. If the mass of the protostellar cloud
is smaller than about 0.08M , the central temperature is never large
enough to allow for the ignition of stable thermonuclear reactions, and
radiation is only emitted as the cloud contracts and cools down. The
outcome is then a planet or a brown dwarf. If instead M > ∼ 0.08M
the star starts burning steadily H to He in its core. For a star of mass
M M this phase lasts about 1010 yr, and in this stage the star is
on the main sequence of the Hertzsprung–Russell (HR) diagram. More
generally, in a large range of masses, the evolutionary time-scale on the
main sequence can be approximately reproduced by
When the H fuel in the core is nearly exhausted the star enters a
complicated evolutionary phase, which depends strongly on its mass.
We focus here on massive stars, M > ∼(6 − 9)M , since a value in this
range is believed to be the minimum progenitor mass necessary for a SN
23
A more detailed discussion of the explosion.23 When the H fuel is almost exhausted the He core can no
value of this minimal mass, as well as longer support itself, and begins to contract. As a result, the temper-
its dependence on metallicity, is given
on page 30. The notion of star metallic-
ature at the edge of the core increases sufficiently that the H in a shell
ity is reviewed in the Complement Sec- around the core can again undergo fusion into He. At this stage the
tion 10.6. star consists of an inert He core surrounded by a burning H shell. The
core no longer produces energy, so it has a vanishing luminosity. Since
the luminosity produced at radius r is proportional to the temperature
gradient dT (t)/dr, the vanishing of the luminosity implies that the He
core is isothermal. However, the luminosity produced by the H shell is
larger than the one that was produced during core-H burning. Part of
this energy goes into a slow expansion of the envelope, and as a result
the star becomes larger and redder.
The burning H shell continues to produce He, and these “nuclear
ashes” increase the size of the He core. This phase of the evolution ends
when the He core is no longer able to support the weight of the matter
over it. Indeed, for a star of mass M with an isothermal core of mass
qM and an envelope of mass (1 − q)M , there is a maximum value of
q beyond which the isothermal core can longer sustain the weight of
the layers above it. This critical value, known as the Chandrasekhar–
Schönberg limit, is given by qmax 0.37(μenv /μic )2 , where μenv and
μic are the mean molecular weights in the envelope and in the core,
24
See e.g. Padmanabhan (2001), Sec- respectively.24 For a star with solar-mass composition, qmax 0.08. For
tion 3.4.3, or Carroll and Ostlie (2007), low-mass stars at this stage the electron gas starts to be degenerate, and
Section 13.1, for derivations and de-
tailed discussions.
electron degeneracy pressure increases the value of qmax . For instance,
for a 1 M star the resulting value is qmax 0.13. In contrast, for
a massive star, say M > ∼ 5M , the effect of electron degeneracy in the
core at this stage is still negligible, so when the mass in the He core
becomes about 8% of the total mass of the star the He core begins to
contract, on a time-scale much shorter than the typical time-scale of the
main-sequence evolution. For a star with M = 5M , this phase lasts
10.3 The dynamics of core collapse 23
about 3 × 106 yr. The contraction raises the temperature in the core,
and when the inner core temperature reaches a value T ∼ 108 K, He
burning ignites and stops the contraction of the core. At this stage the
star has two sources of nuclear energy. An inner core, where He is burnt
to carbon and oxygen, and a shell where H is burnt to He. The two
are separated by a He-rich region, where the temperature is not large
enough to burn He.
Carbon is produced through the triple-alpha process in which two α
particles, i.e. nuclei of 42 He, collide to produce beryllium,
4
He + 4 He ↔ 8 Be . (10.16)
The 8 Be nucleus is unstable and will decay very quickly back to two α
particles, unless it reacts immediately with a third α particle to produce
C,
4
He + 8 Be → 12 C + γ . (10.17)
In this sense, the triple-alpha process is really a three-body collision.
After sufficient C has been produced, in the He-burning core there are
the conditions for producing oxygen, through
12
C + 4 He → 16
O+γ. (10.18)
When most of the He fuel has been burnt, thermonuclear reactions can
no longer support the C–O core, which contracts. Then a He shell around
it ignites.
For masses in the range (6 − 9)M the subsequent evolutionary sce-
nario is not so well known, with a final output that can be (from the lower
to the upper mass range), a CO white dwarf, a NeMgO white dwarf, an
electron-capture SN before the neon photo-disintegration phase, and fi-
nally nuclear burning all the way up to the production of an iron core.25 25
See Woosley and Heger (2015), and
For a star with a mass higher than a critical value Mup in the range the discussion on page 31.
(7 − 9)M , after further contraction the burning of C in the core begins.
The theoretical prediction for the critical mass depends on issues such
as the treatment of convection. For M > Mup the star now has a core
where C is burnt, a burning He shell and an outer H-burning shell,
separated by inert regions. C burns through the direct fusion of two 12 C
nuclei into a highly excited state of 24 Mg, which then decays into various
channels, including decay to 20 Ne. After C burning, the composition of
the core is mostly dominated by the 16 O produced during He burning
and by 20 Ne and 24 Mg produced by C burning. Even though O has a
lower Coulomb barrier, neon burning ignites first through the process
20
Ne + γ → 16 O + 4 He, induced by high-energy photons from the tail of
the Planckian distribution, and later O burning ignites.
Ne ignites for stars with a mass above a critical value that is some-
what uncertain, but is estimated to be in the range (10 − 12)M . After
the ignition of Ne the star goes through the subsequent stages of O and
silicon burning. Si burning eventually produces a core of elements of the
iron group, mostly 54 Fe, 56 Fe and 56 Ni. These nuclei have the highest
binding energy per nucleon, so no further energy can be extracted by
24 Stellar collapse
explained by the fact that its progenitor was a blue supergiant. In fact,
in this case we know the progenitor, which was catalogued as Sk 202-69,
and it is indeed known that at the time of the explosion it was a 12-th
magnitude blue supergiant, with M 20M . Actually, observations of
the circumstellar material show that the star was a red supergiant until
about 30,000 years before the explosion. The transition from red to blue
supergiant shortly before the explosion could take place in a single star
by a combination of low metallicity and fast rotation, resulting in an
envelope richer in He. Such a heavier envelope favors a blue solution.
Another possibility is that the progenitor was originally in a binary
system, with a red supergiant of about (16 − 18)M and a companion
with a mass of order 3M , probably a main-sequence star. In this
scenario the red supergiant expands and engulfs the companion star. In
the following phase of common envelope evolution part of the common
envelope is ejected while the main sequence star is tidally disrupted.
The resulting larger mass of the envelope drives the transition from red
to blue supergiant.
inner core region, because of the high density, neutrinos cannot stream
freely. Therefore, just as a star has a photosphere that delimits the re-
gion where the photons can begin to stream freely to the exterior, in
this case a “neutrinosphere” develops below the shock front. Neutrinos
deposit energy in the matter between the nascent neutron star in the
inner core and the photosphere, through scattering processes such as
νe + n → e− + p and ν̄e + p → e+ + n. Since most of the gravitational
energy liberated in the collapse goes into neutrinos, these processes are
quite significant, and heat up the matter below the shock front, gen-
erating a further pressure that can revive the shock, on a time-scale of
0.1 s. In fact, to revive the shock, it is sufficient that a few percent of the
total neutrino energy is converted into thermal energies of the nucleons,
leptons and photons. If this happens, the shock wave resumes and lifts
the external layers of the star in a SN explosion.
Hydrodynamical instabilities
While the scenario just described is theoretically appealing and convinc-
ing, a proof that this is what actually happens must rely on numerical
studies. Simulations of SN explosions are, however, of the outmost com-
plexity. Present simulations unavoidably make important approxima-
tions of some sort, such as Newtonian rather than general-relativistic
gravity and spherical symmetry instead of full three-dimensional simu-
lations, but the outcome turns out to depend strongly on details. Spher-
ically symmetric simulations, even including accurate hydrodynamic
codes, neutrino transport and an extended set of neutrino reactions,
fail to obtain SN explosions unless the progenitor is in the mass range
26
This is basically related to the fact ∼ (7 − 9)M .26 For larger masses, this points toward the importance of
that, as we will discuss on page 31, instabilities in a full three-dimensional setting. Rayleigh–Taylor finger-
stars in this mass range explode when
they have a Ne–O core, and at the edge
ing instabilities have been considered as a possible boost for neutrino
of such a core the density gradient is luminosity. More generally, since the heating from neutrinos is strongly
very steep. In contrast, heavier stars dependent on the distance from the center, convective instabilities are
explode after burning their fuels all the expected to play an important role. This is also confirmed by the de-
way to iron, and therefore have an iron
core. The profile of iron cores is much
tailed observations that have been made possible by the explosion of
flatter, leading to larger infall and ram SN 1987A in the Large Magellanic Cloud, which have shown that ra-
pressure from the external layers. Iron dioactive nuclei produced deep in the core of the star have been mixed
cores are therefore much harder to ex- with the hydrogen envelope of the star. Three-dimensional numerical
plode than Ne–O cores.
simulations have indeed shown that violent convective overturns appear.
To assess whether this really leads to SN explosion, it is necessary to
implement accurate energy-dependent neutrino transport codes, which
in the full three-dimensional setting is beyond present computer power.
However, three-dimensional simulations have revealed the existence of
non-radial instabilities that might be very important for the explosion
mechanism. In particular it has been found that, under the effect of
accretion from the infalling material, the shock front displays a non-
radial instability termed SASI (standing accretion shock instability),
which in a decomposition in spherical harmonics is especially evident in
the l = 1, 2 mode, i.e. it produces a dipole and a quadrupole deformation
10.3 The dynamics of core collapse 29
the gravitational force exerted by ejecta that leave faster in one direc-
tion does not compensate that of the slower and typically denser ejecta
leaving in the opposite direction. This mechanism can build velocities
larger than 1000 km/s. As we will study in Section 14.3.5, even-higher
recoil velocities can be imparted to the remnant in the coalescence of
spinning compact binaries.
Fig. 2 Fig. 4
Owners of sail or power boats will find the take-down oars shown
in the sketch easily made and of value in an emergency far out of
proportion to the space occupied in a boat. A pair of ordinary oars
was cut as shown, and pipe fittings were attached to the ends to
form a detachable joint. When knocked down the oars may be stored
in a seat cupboard, or other convenient place.—Contributed by H. E.
Ward, Kent, Wash.
How to Make Propeller Blades Quickly
Requiring a number of propeller blades for use in making models
of windmills, and other constructions, I found that I could save much
time and obtain a satisfactory set of propeller blades by using
ordinary shoehorns of the same size. The small ends of the horns
were flattened out so that they could be fastened to pieces of wood
for bearings, and then hammered to the proper shape for cutting the
air, or receiving the force of the wind.
Bench Stop