Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ce6 Article
Ce6 Article
Compressive Strength and Water Absorption of a Pathway in Central Colleges of the Philippines
I. INTRODUCTION
One of the main environmental problems experienced in this generation is plastic pollution and its improper waste
disposal. Single-use plastic (SUP) sachets, usually made out of PET, contribute massively to this crisis, in the
Philippines at least, amounting to roughly fifty percent of the country’s mismanaged plastic waste, approximately 59.8
billion per year is used [1]. Plastic takes about 20 to 500 years to decompose and due to its continuous growth in
production, plastic isn’t going anywhere and will remain in landfills and oceans for a long time. To promote sustainable
construction practices, it is imperative to conduct extensive research on PET concrete bricks as it holds great potential
for reducing plastic waste.
This research aims to design and develop a brick-style concrete with recycled PET focused on improving its
compressive strength and water absorption. To attain this, the researchers will first determine all the materials and data
needed to make the brick-style concrete with recycled PET from SUP sachet. Along with the collected and cleaned SUP
sachets, the researchers will be preparing the materials required in fabricating prototypes using 0%, 1%, 3%, 5%, 7%
and 9% PET-to-fine aggregates ratio and test its compressive strength and identify its water absorption rate. Based from
the tests conducted, the researchers will identify the PET ratio that has the highest compressive strength and lowest
water absorption. After that, the researchers will be utilizing the optimum ratio along with the designed geometric
dimension, behaton shape, in constructing a pathway in Central Colleges of the Philippines (CCP). Lastly, the
researchers will make a cost benefit analysis to compare the brick-style concrete to conventional concrete bricks.
ADLAWAN-CAROLINO-LARDIZABAL-NADULPIT
Design and Develop of Brick-Style Concrete with Recycled Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) as a Supplementary Component for Improving
Compressive Strength and Water Absorption of a Pathway in Central Colleges of the Philippines
ADLAWAN-CAROLINO-LARDIZABAL-NADULPIT
Design and Develop of Brick-Style Concrete with Recycled Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) as a Supplementary Component for Improving
Compressive Strength and Water Absorption of a Pathway in Central Colleges of the Philippines
III. METHODOLOGY
This study has been achieved through the accomplishment of each step in this conceptual framework.
Gathering of data and materials needed through review of related literature is the initial step for this study. Followed
by the collection of the materials which are Ordinary Portland Cement, Bistay sand as the fine aggregate, SUP sachet that
was treated and shredded into 4 mm by 0.075 mm, and the 200 mm by 165 mm by 60 mm behaton brick mold. The
prototype sample containing 0%, 1%, 3%, 5%, 7% and 9% of PET, which partially replaced the fine aggregate in the
concrete mixture, and shaped as behaton, was cured for 28 days. Afterwards, it underwent compressive strength test and
water absorption test. The results gathered from the laboratory testing was then assessed and evaluated using SPSS in order
to decide on the optimum PET ratio. The researchers then laid out a pathway in CCP utilizing the optimum PET ratio and
the behaton shape. Additionally, the researchers made a cost benefit analysis comparing the brick-style concrete with
recycled PET to the conventional concrete bricks. Lastly, this research study was presented through a public forum in CCP
located at Barangay Doña Imelda, Quezon City.
ADLAWAN-CAROLINO-LARDIZABAL-NADULPIT
Design and Develop of Brick-Style Concrete with Recycled Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) as a Supplementary Component for Improving
Compressive Strength and Water Absorption of a Pathway in Central Colleges of the Philippines
0 1 25.72
2 34.83
3 30.55
1 1 27.78
2 26.33
3 26.75
3 1 24.53
2 25.43
3 25.51
5 1 9.98
2 13.59
3 9.36
7 1 9.05
2 9.45
3 9.30
9 1 8.11
2 6.96
3 6.83
The table shows the result of the compressive strength of each prototype with different PET percentage.
Table 4.2 Mean value for each PET percentage for compressive strength
0% 1% 3% 5% 7% 9%
N Valid 3 3 3 3 3 3
Missing 0 0 0 0 0 0
ADLAWAN-CAROLINO-LARDIZABAL-NADULPIT
Design and Develop of Brick-Style Concrete with Recycled Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) as a Supplementary Component for Improving
Compressive Strength and Water Absorption of a Pathway in Central Colleges of the Philippines
The researchers used SPSS to calculate the mean of each PET percentage for the compressive strength. The table shows
the mean values of every percentage. This research study used the ASTM C902 standard for the minimum compressive
strength which is 20.7 MPa. The control which is the 0%, along with 1% and 3% PET mixture passed the said standard.
Percentage of
Bricks No. W1 (kg) W2 (kg) Water Absorption %
PET
1 2.58 2.98 15.47
ADLAWAN-CAROLINO-LARDIZABAL-NADULPIT
Design and Develop of Brick-Style Concrete with Recycled Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) as a Supplementary Component for Improving
Compressive Strength and Water Absorption of a Pathway in Central Colleges of the Philippines
Using the details gathered from the result of water absorption, the researchers labeled W1 as the initial weight of
the bricks, after submerging the brick within 24 hours, the researchers labeled W2 as the final weight of the bricks. The
researchers used the formula [(W2-W1)/W1] (100) to get the percentage of water absorbed by the brick.
Table 4.4 Mean value for each PET percentage for water absorption
0% 1% 3% 5% 7% 9%
N Valid 3 3 3 3 3 3
Missing 0 0 0 0 0 0
The researchers used SPSS to calculate the mean of each PET percentage for the water absorption. The table shows the
mean values of every percentage. This research study used the ASTM C642 standard for the maximum water absorption
which is 20% of its original weight. All of the percentages obtained a mean value lower than 20 which means that it passed
the said standard.
MPa in compressive strength, 12.03% water absorption rate and is the most cost-efficient saving up to 24.90% of the
total cost.
REFERENCES
[1] Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives (Philippines) (2020). Regulating Single-Use Plastics in the Philippines
Opportunities to Move Forward. GAIA. https://www.no-burn.org/wp-content/uploads/Philippine-Policy-Brief-on-
SUPs-Ban-1.pdf
[2] Hassan, M. I. H., Kadir, A. A., Arzlan, I. S. I. et al (2022). Recycling of PET Bottles into Different Types of Building
Materials: A Review. Arch. Metall. Mater. 67 (2022), 1, 189-196. https://doi.org/10.24425/amm.2022.137488
[3] Azim, N. B., Khalid, F. S., Irwan, J. M. et al. (2018). Performance of composite sand cement brick containing
recycled concrete aggregate and waste polyethylene terephthalate with different mix design ratio. IOP Conference
Series: Earth and Environmental Science. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/140/1/012129
[4] Department of Public Works and Highways (2016, January 26). DPWH Standard Specification for Item 741 -
Interlocking Precast Concrete Blocks (Volume II, 2012 Edition).
https://www.dpwh.gov.ph/DPWH/sites/default/files/issuances/DO_026_s2016.pdf
[5] Shamsudin, M.M.H et al (2021, March). Compressive and Flexural Strength of Concrete Containing Recycled
Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET). Scientific.Net. Retrieved from
http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.879.13
[6] ASTM International (2009). Standard Specification for Pedestrian and Light Traffic Paving Brick. ASTM
International. Retrieved from https://www.astm.org/c0902-20.html
[7] Team Xometry (2022, June 9). Polyethylene Terephthalate: Uses, Advantages, and Disadvantages. Xometry.
Retrieved from https://www.xometry.com/resources/materials/polyethylene-terephthalate/
[8] Deraman, R., Nawi, M. N. M., Yasin, I. M. N., Ismail, M. H. & Ahmed, R. S. M. O. M. (2021, November).
Polyethylene Terephthalate Waste Utilisation for Production of Low Thermal Conductivity Cement Sand Bricks.
ResearchGate. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.37934/arfmts.88.3.117136
[9] Awoyera P. O. & Adesina A. (2020). Plastic wastes to construction products: Status, limitations and future
perspective. ScienceDirect Case Studies in Construction Materials, Volume 12. Retrieved from
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2020.e00330
[10] Marsiglio, L., Cheng, S., Falk, E., Fugh, A., Mulvaney, K., Slocum, B. et al. (2020, November). Comparing the
Properties of Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Plastic Bricks to Conventional Concrete Masonry Units. 2020 IEEE
Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (GHTC). Retrieved from
https://doi.org/10.1109/GHTC46280.2020.9342915
[11] Mak, S. I., Wu T. M. Y., Tang, F. W. F., Li, J. C. H. & Lai, C. W. (2021, March). A Review on Utilization of Plastic
Wastes in Making Construction Bricks. ResearchGate. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1755-
1315/706/1/012001
[12] Zakaria, Z., Osman, H., Rahim, N.A.A., Munusamy, Y. & Ismail, H. (2023). Recycled Polyethylene Terephthalate
Blends and Composites: Impact of PET Waste, Engineering Design, and Their Applications. Recycled Polymer
Blends and Composites. Springer, Cham. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37046-5_21
ADLAWAN-CAROLINO-LARDIZABAL-NADULPIT