Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ebook Inorganic Chemistry 2018 7Th Tina Overton Fraser A Armstrong DR Martin Weller Jonathan Mickey Rourke Online PDF All Chapter
Ebook Inorganic Chemistry 2018 7Th Tina Overton Fraser A Armstrong DR Martin Weller Jonathan Mickey Rourke Online PDF All Chapter
https://ebookmeta.com/product/inorganic-chemistry-5th-edition-
catherine-housecroft/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/chemistry-3-introducing-inorganic-
organic-and-physical-chemistry-2nd-edition-burrows/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/descriptive-inorganic-
chemistry-6th-edition-geoff-rayner-canham/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/toronto-notes-2018-34th-edition-
tina-binesh-marvasti-sydney-mcqueen-eds/
Organic Chemistry, 12th Edition Francis A. Carey Dr.
https://ebookmeta.com/product/organic-chemistry-12th-edition-
francis-a-carey-dr/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/comprehensive-inorganic-chemistry-
iii-3rd-edition-jan-reedijk-editor/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/inorganic-chemistry-solutions-
manual-5th-edition-gary-l-miessler/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/archaeological-chemistry-a-
symposium-martin-levey-editor/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/practical-approaches-to-biological-
inorganic-chemistry-2nd-edition-robert-r-crichton/
The elements
Name Symbol Atomic Molar mass Name Symbol Atomic Molar mass
number (g mol−1) number (g mol−1)
Actinium Ac 89 227 Mercury Hg 80 200.59
Aluminium (aluminum) Al 13 26.98 Molybdenun Mo 42 95.95
Americium Am 95 243 Moscovium Mc 115 289
Antimony Sb 51 121.76 Neodymium Nd 60 144.24
Argon Ar 18 39.95 Neon Ne 10 20.18
Arsenic As 33 74.92 Neptunium Np 93 237
Astatine At 85 210 Nickel Ni 28 58.69
Barium Ba 56 137.33 Nihonium Nh 113 286
Berkelium Bk 97 247 Niobium Nb 41 92.91
Beryllium Be 4 9.01 Nitrogen N 7 14.01
Bismuth Bi 83 208.98 Nobelium No 102 259
Bohrium Bh 107 270 Oganesson Og 118 294
Boron B 5 10.81 Osmium Os 76 190.23
Bromine Br 35 79.90
Oxygen O 8 16.00
Cadmium Cd 48 112.41
Palladium Pd 46 106.42
Caesium (cesium) Cs 55 132.91
Phosphorus P 15 30.97
Calcium Ca 20 40.08
Platinum Pt 78 195.08
Californium Cf 98 251
Plutonium Pu 94 244
Carbon C 6 12.01
Polonium Po 84 209
Cerium Ce 58 140.12
Chlorine Cl 17 35.45 Potassium K 19 39.10
Chromium Cr 24 52.00 Praseodymium Pr 59 140.91
Cobalt Co 27 58.93 Promethium Pm 61 145
Copernicum Cn 112 285 Protactinium Pa 91 231.04
Copper Cu 29 63.55 Radium Ra 88 226
Curium Cm 96 247 Radon Rn 86 222
Darmstadtium Ds 110 281 Rhenium Re 75 186.21
Dubnium Db 105 270 Rhodium Rh 45 102.91
Dysprosium Dy 66 162.50 Roentgenium Rg 111 281
Einsteinium Es 99 252 Rubidium Rb 37 85.47
Erbium Er 68 167.27 Ruthenium Ru 44 101.07
Europium Eu 63 151.96 Rutherfordium Rf 104 267
Fermium Fm 100 257 Samarium Sm 62 150.36
Flerovium Fl 114 289 Scandium Sc 21 44.96
Fluorine F 9 19.00 Seaborgium Sg 106 269
Francium Fr 87 223 Selenium Se 34 78.97
Gadolinium Gd 64 157.25 Silicon Si 14 28.09
Gallium Ga 31 69.72 Silver Ag 47 107.87
Germanium Ge 32 72.63 Sodium Na 11 22.99
Gold Au 79 196.97 Strontium Sr 38 87.62
Hafnium Hf 72 178.49 Sulfur S 16 32.06
Hassium Hs 108 270 Tantalum Ta 73 180.95
Helium He 2 4.00 Technetium Tc 43 98
Holmium Ho 67 164.93 Tellurium Te 52 127.60
Hydrogen H 1 1.008 Tennessine Ts 117 293
Indium In 49 114.82 Terbium Tb 65 158.93
Iodine I 53 126.90 Thallium TI 81 204.38
Iridium Ir 77 192.22 Thorium Th 90 232.04
Iron Fe 26 55.85
Thulium Tm 69 168.93
Krypton Kr 36 83.80
Tin Sn 50 118.71
Lanthanum La 57 138.91
Titanium Ti 22 47.87
Lawrencium Lr 103 262
Tungsten W 74 183.84
Lead Pb 82 207.2
Uranium U 92 238.03
Lithium Li 3 6.94
Vanadium V 23 50.94
Livermorium Lv 116 293
Lutetium Lu 71 174.97 Xenon Xe 54 131.29
Magnesium Mg 12 24.31 Ytterbium Yb 70 173.05
Manganese Mn 25 54.94 Yttrium Y 39 88.91
Meitnerium Mt 109 278 Zinc Zn 30 65.41
Mendelevium Md 101 258 Zirconium Zr 40 91.22
INORGANIC
CHEMISTRY
7th edition
1
3
Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX2 6DP,
United Kingdom
Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford.
It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship,
and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of
Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries
© T. L. Overton, J. P. Rourke, M. T. Weller, and F. A. Armstrong 2018
The moral rights of the authors have been asserted
Fourth edition 2006
Fifth edition 2010
Sixth edition 2014
Impression: 1
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in
a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the
prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted
by law, by licence or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics
rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the
above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the
address above
You must not circulate this work in any other form
and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer
Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press
198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America
British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
Data available
Library of Congress Control Number: 2017950999
ISBN 978–0–19–252295–5
Printed in Italy by L.E.G.O. S.p.A.
Links to third party websites are provided by Oxford in good faith and
for information only. Oxford disclaims any responsibility for the materials
contained in any third party website referenced in this work.
Preface
Introducing Inorganic Chemistry explore further. These aspects of inorganic chemistry are then
Our aim in the seventh edition of Inorganic Chemistry is to developed more thoroughly later in the text including, in this
provide a comprehensive, fully updated, and contemporary edition, a brand-new chapter devoted to green chemistry.
introduction to the diverse and fascinating discipline of inor-
ganic chemistry. Inorganic chemistry deals with the properties What is new to this edition?
of all of the elements in the periodic table. Those classified as In this new edition we have refined the presentation, or-
metallic range from the highly reactive sodium and barium to ganization, and visual representation. The book has been
the noble metals, such as gold and platinum. The nonmetals extensively revised, much has been rewritten and there is
include solids, liquids, and gases, and their properties encom- some completely new material, including additional content
pass those of the aggressive, highly-oxidizing fluorine and the on characterization techniques in chapter 8. The text now
unreactive gases such as helium. Although this variety and di- includes twelve new boxes that showcase recent develop-
versity are features of any study of inorganic chemistry, there ments and exciting discoveries; these include boxes 11.3 on
are underlying patterns and trends which enrich and enhance sodium ion batteries, 13.7 on touchscreens, 23.2 on d-orbit-
our understanding of the subject. These trends in reactivity, al participation in lanthanoid chemistry, 25.1 on renewable
structure, and properties of the elements and their compounds energy, and 26.1 on cellulose degradation.
provide an insight into the landscape of the periodic table and We have written our book with the student in mind, and
provide the foundation on which to build a deeper understand- have added new pedagogical features and enhanced others.
ing of the chemistry of the elements and their compounds. Additional context boxes on recent innovations link theory
Inorganic compounds vary from ionic solids, which can be to practice, and encourage understanding of the real-world
described by simple extensions of classical electrostatics, to significance of inorganic chemistry. Extended examples,
covalent compounds and metals, which are best described by self-test questions, and new exercises and tutorial problems
models that have their origins in quantum mechanics. We can stimulate thinking, and encourage the development of data
rationalize and interpret the properties of many inorganic com- analysis skills, and a closer engagement with research. We
pounds by using qualitative models that are based on quantum have also improved the clarity of the text with a new two-
mechanics, including the interaction of atomic orbitals to form column format throughout. Many of the 2000 illustrations
molecular orbitals and the band structures of solids. The text and the marginal structures have been redrawn, many have
builds on similar qualitative bonding models that should al- been enlarged for improved clarity, and all are presented in
ready be familiar from introductory chemistry courses. full colour. We have used colour systematically rather than
just for decoration, and have ensured that it serves a peda-
Making inorganic chemistry relevant gogical purpose, encouraging students to recognize patterns
Although qualitative models of bonding and reactivity clarify and trends in bonding and reactivity.
and systematize the subject, inorganic chemistry is essentially
an experimental subject. Inorganic chemistry lies at the heart How is this textbook organized?
of many of the most important recent advances in chemistry. The topics in Part 1, Foundations, have been revised to make
New, often unusual, inorganic compounds and materials are them more accessible to the reader, with additional qualitative
constantly being synthesized and identified. Modern inorganic explanation accompanying the more mathematical treatments.
syntheses continue to enrich the field with compounds that The material has been reorganized to allow a more coherent
give us fresh perspectives on structure, bonding, and reactivity. progression through the topics of symmetry and bonding and
Inorganic chemistry has considerable impact on our every- to present the important topic of catalysis early on in the text.
day lives and on other scientific disciplines. The chemical indus- Part 2, The elements and their compounds, has been thor-
try depends strongly on inorganic chemistry as it is essential to oughly updated, building on the improvements made in earlier
the formulation and improvement of the modern materials and editions, and includes additional contemporary contexts such
compounds used as catalysts, energy storage materials, semi- as solar cells, new battery materials, and touchscreen tech-
conductors, optoelectronics, superconductors, and advanced nology. The opening chapter draws together periodic trends
ceramics. The environmental, biological and medical impacts and cross references ahead of their more detailed treatment in
of inorganic chemistry on our lives are enormous. Current the subsequent descriptive chapters. These chapters start with
topics in industrial, materials, biological, and environmental hydrogen and proceed across the periodic table, taking in the
chemistry are highlighted throughout the early sections of the s-block metals and the diverse elements of the p block, before
book to illustrate their importance and encourage the reader to ending with extensive coverage of the d- and f-block elements.
vi Preface
Each of these chapters is organized into two sections: Es- biological systems and the various and extraordinarily subtle
sentials describes the fundamental chemistry of the elements ways in which each one is exploited; for instance, at the ac-
and the Detail provides a more extensive account. The chem- tive sites of enzymes where they are responsible for catalytic
ical properties of each group of elements and their com- activities that are essential for living organisms. Chapter 27
pounds are further enriched with descriptions of current ap- describes how medical science is exploiting the ‘stranger’ ele-
plications and recent advances made in inorganic chemistry. ments, such as platinum, gold, lithium, arsenic and synthetic
The patterns and trends that emerge are rationalized by technetium, to treat and diagnose illness.
drawing on the principles introduced in Part 1. Chapter 22 We are confident that this text will serve the undergradu-
has been expanded considerably to include homogeneous ate chemist well. It provides the theoretical building blocks
catalytic processes that rely on the organometallic chemistry with which to build knowledge and understanding of the
described there, with much of this new material setting the distinctions between chemical elements and should help to
scene for the new chapter on green chemistry in Part 3. rationalize the sometimes bewildering diversity of descriptive
Part 3, Expanding our horizons, takes the reader to the fore- inorganic chemistry. It also takes the student to the forefront
front of knowledge in several areas of current research. These of the discipline and should therefore complement many
chapters explore specialized, vibrant topics that are of impor- courses taken in the later stages of a programme of study.
tance to industry and biology, and include the new Chapter Mark Weller
25 on green chemistry. A comprehensive chapter on mate- Tina Overton
rials chemistry, Chapter 24, covers the latest discoveries in Jonathan Rourke
energy materials, heterogeneous catalysis, and nanomaterials. Fraser Armstrong
Chapter 26 discusses the natural roles of different elements in
Mark Weller is Professor of Chemistry at the University of Bath and President of the Materials Chemistry Division of the
Royal Society of Chemistry. His research interests cover a wide range of synthetic and structural inorganic chemistry including
photovoltaic compounds, zeolites, battery materials, and specialist pigments; he is the author of over 300 primary literature
publications in these fields. Mark has taught both inorganic chemistry and physical chemistry methods at undergraduate and
postgraduate levels for over 35 years, with his lectures covering topics across materials chemistry, the inorganic chemistry of the
s- and f- block elements, and analytical methods applied to inorganic compounds. He is a co-author of OUP’s Characterisation
Methods in Inorganic Chemistry and an OUP Primer (23) on Inorganic Materials Chemistry.
Tina Overton is Professor of Chemistry Education at Monash University in Australia and Honorary Professor at the
University of Nottingham, UK. Tina has published on the topics of critical thinking, context and problem-based learning,
the development of problem solving skills, work-based learning and employability, and has co-authored several textbooks
in inorganic chemistry and skills development. She has been awarded the Royal Society of C
hemistry’s HE Teaching Award,
Tertiary Education Award and Nyholm Prize, the Royal Australian Chemical Institute’s Fensham Medal, and is a National
Teaching Fellow and Senior Fellow of the Higher Education Academy.
Jonathan Rourke is Associate Professor of Chemistry at the University of Warwick. He received his PhD at the University of
Sheffield on organometallic polymers and liquid crystals, followed by postdoctoral work in Canada with Professor Richard
Puddephatt and back in Britain with Duncan Bruce. His initial independent research career began at Bristol University and
then at Warwick, where he’s been ever since. Over the years Dr Rourke has taught most aspects of inorganic chemistry, all the
way from basic bonding, through symmetry analysis to advanced transition metal chemistry.
Fraser Armstrong is a Professor of Chemistry at the University of Oxford and a Fellow of St John’s College, Oxford. In 2008,
he was elected as a Fellow of the Royal Society of London. His interests span the fields of electrochemistry, renewable energy,
hydrogen, enzymology, and biological inorganic chemistry, and he heads a research group investigating electrocatalysis by
enzymes. He was an Associate Professor at the University of California, Irvine, before joining the Department of Chemistry
at Oxford in 1993.
Acknowledgements
We would particularly like to acknowledge the inspirational role and major contributions of Peter Atkins, whose early
editions of Inorganic Chemistry formed the foundations of this text.
We have taken care to ensure that the text is free of errors. This is difficult in a rapidly changing field, where today’s knowledge
is soon replaced by tomorrow’s. We thank all those colleagues who so willingly gave their time and expertise to a careful reading
of a variety of draft chapters.
Many of the figures in Chapter 26 were produced using PyMOL software; for more information see W.L. DeLano, The PyMOL
Molecular Graphics System (2002), De Lano Scientific, San Carlos, CA, USA.
Dawood Afzal, Truman State University Richard Henderson, University of Newcastle Michael North, University of York
Helen Aspinall, University of Liverpool Eva Hervia, University of Strathclyde Charles O’Hara, University of Strathclyde
Kent Barefield, Georgia Tech Michael S. Hill, University of Bath Lars Öhrström, Chalmers (Goteborg)
Rolf Berger, University of Uppsala Jan Philipp Hofmann, Eindhoven University of Edwin Otten, University of Groningen
Harry Bitter, Wageningen University Technology Ivan Parkin, University College London
Richard Blair, University of Central Florida Martin Hollamby, Keele University Stephen Potts, University College London
Andrew Bond, University of Cambridge Brendan Howlin, University of Surrey Dan Price, University of Glasgow
Songping Huang, Kent State University Robert Raja, University of Southampton
Darren Bradshaw, University of Southampton
Carl Hultman, Gannon University T. B. Rauchfuss, University of Illinois
Paul Brandt, North Central College
Stephanie Hurst, Northern Arizona University Jan Reedijk, University of Leiden
Karen Brewer, Hamilton College
Jon Iggo, University of Liverpool Denise Rooney, National University of Ireland,
George Britovsek, Imperial College, London
Karl Jackson, Virginia Union University Maynooth
Scott Bunge, Kent State University
S. Jackson, University of Glasgow Peter J. Sadler FRS, Warwick University
David Cardin, University of Reading
Michael Jensen, Ohio University Graham Saunders, Waikato University
Claire Carmalt, University College London
Pavel Karen, University of Oslo Ian Shannon, University of Birmingham
Carl Carrano, San Diego State University
Terry Kee, University of Leeds P. Shiv Halasyamani, University of Houston
Gareth W. V. Cave, Nottingham Trent University
Paul King, Birbeck, University of London Stephen Skinner, Imperial College, London
Neil Champness, University of Nottingham
Rachael Kipp, Suffolk University Bob Slade, University of Surrey
Ferman Chavez, Oakland University
Caroline Kirk, University of Edinburgh Peter Slater, University of Birmingham
Ann Chippindale, University of Reading
Lars Kloo, KTH Royal Institute of Technology LeGrande Slaughter, University of
Karl Coleman, University of Durham
Randolph Kohn, University of Bath Northern Texas
Simon Collinson, Open University
Simon Lancaster, University of East Anglia Martin B. Smith, University of Loughborough
William Connick, University of Cincinnati
Paul Lickiss, Imperial College, London Sheila Smith, University of Michigan
Peter J Cragg, University of Brighton
Sven Lindin, Lund University Jake Soper, Georgia Institute of Technology
Stephen Daff, University of Edinburgh
Paul Loeffler, Sam Houston State University David M. Stanbury, Auburn University
Sandra Dann, University of Loughborough
Jose A. Lopez-Sanchez, University of Liverpool Jonathan Steed, University of Durham
Marcetta Y. Darensbourg, Texas A&M University
Paul Low, University of Western Australia Gunnar Svensson, University of Stockholm
Nancy Dervisi, University of Cardiff
Michael Lufaso, University of North Florida Zachary J. Tonzetich, University of Texas at San
Richard Douthwaite, University of York Antonio
Astrid Lund Ramstad, Norwegian Labour
Simon Duckett, University of York Inspection Authority Ryan J. Trovitch, Arizona State University
Jeremiah Duncan, Plymouth State University Jason Lynam, University of York Hernando A.Trujillo, Wilkes University
A.W. Ehlers, Free University of Amsterdam Joel Mague, Tulane University Fernando J. Uribe-Romo, University of Central
Mari-Ann Einarsrud, Norwegian University of Florida
Mary F. Mahon, University of Bath
Science and Technology Aldrik Velders, Wageningen University
Frank Mair, University of Manchester
Anders Eriksson, University of Uppsala Andrei Verdernikov, University of Maryland
Sarantos Marinakis, Queen Mary, University of
Andrew Fogg, University of Chester London Ramon Vilar, Imperial College, London
Andrew Frazer, University of Central Florida Andrew Marr, Queen’s University Belfast Keith Walters, Northern Kentucky University
René de Gelder, Radboud University David E. Marx, University of Scranton Robert Wang, Salem State College
Margaret Geselbracht, Reed College John McGrady, University of Oxford David Weatherburn, University of Victoria, Wellington
Dean M. Giolando, University of Toledo Roland Meier, Friedrich-Alexander University Eric J. Werner, The University of Tampa
Christian R. Goldsmith, Auburn University Ryan Mewis, Manchester Metropolitan University Michael K. Whittlesey, University of Bath
Gregory Grant, University of Tennessee John R Miecznikowski, Fairfield University Craig Williams, University of Wolverhampton
Yurii Gun’ko, Trinity College Dublin Suzanna C. Milheiro, Western New England University Scott Williams, Rochester Institute of Technology
Simon Hall, University of Bristol Katrina Miranda, University of Arizona Paul Wilson, University of Southampton
Justin Hargreaves, University of Glasgow Liviu M. Mirica, Washington University in St. Louis John T. York, Stetson University
Tony Hascall, Northern Arizona University Grace Morgan, University College Dublin Nigel A. Young, University of Hull
Zachariah Heiden, Washington State University Ebbe Nordlander, University of Lund Jingdong Zhang, Denmark Technical University
About the book
Inorganic Chemistry provides numerous learning features which are built on in the subsequent two sections. Part 2,
to help you master this wide-ranging subject. In addition, The elements and their compounds, divides the descriptive
the text has been designed so that you can either work chemistry into ‘essentials’ and ‘details’, enabling you to eas-
through the chapters chronologically, or dip in at an ap- ily draw out the key principles behind the reactions, before
propriate point in your studies. The book’s online resources exploring them in greater depth. Part 3, Expanding our ho-
provide support to you in your learning. rizons, introduces you to exciting interdisciplinary research
The material in this book has been logically and systemat- at the forefront of inorganic chemistry.
ically laid out in three distinct sections. Part 1, Foundations, The paragraphs below describe the learning features of
outlines the underlying principles of inorganic chemistry, the text and online resources in further detail.
h d f bl l d h
BOX 26.1 How does a copper enzyme degrade cellulose? FURTHER READING
Most of the organic material that is produced by photosynthesis
P.T. Anastas and J.C. Warner, Green chemistry: theory and practice.
is unavailable for use by industry or as fuels. Biomass largely
Oxford University Press (1998). The definitive guide to green
consists of polymeric carbohydrates—polysaccharides such
chemistry.
as cellulose and lignin, that are very difficult to break down
to simpler sugars as they are resistant to hydrolysis. However, M. Lancaster, Green chemistry: an introductory text. Royal Society
a breakthrough has occurred with the discovery that certain of Chemistry (2002). A readable text with industrial examples.
About the book ix
Resource section
At the back of the book is a comprehensive collection of Resource section 1
resources, including an extensive data section and informa- Selected ionic radii
tion relating to group theory and spectroscopy.
Ionic radii are given (in picometres, pm) for the most com- values for high-spin are quoted. Most data are taken
mon oxidation states and coordination geometries. The R.D. Shannon, Acta Crystallogr., 1976, A32, 751,
coordination number is given in parentheses, (4) refers to values for other coordination geometries can be
tetrahedral and (4SP) refers to square planar. All d-block Where Shannon values are not available, Pauling ioni
species are low-spin unless labelled with †, in which case are quoted and are indicated by *.
Problem solving
EXAMPLE 17.3 Analysing the recovery of Br2 from 3.2 How many isomers are there for ‘octahedral’ molecules with
the formula MA3B3, where A and B are monoatomic ligands?
brine
Show that from a thermodynamic standpoint bromide ions can
be oxidized to Br2 by Cl2 and by O2, and suggest a reason why O2
Solutions Manual
is not used for this purpose. A Solutions Manual (ISBN: 9780198814689) by Alen
Hadzovic is available to accompany the text and provides
Answer We need to consider the relevant standard potentials
complete solutions to the self-tests and end-of-chapter
exercises.
Online resources
For students:
3D rotatable molecular structures
Numbered structures can be found online as interactive
3D structures. Type the following URL into your browser,
adding the relevant structure number:
www.chemtube3d.com/weller7/[chapter numberS[structure
number].
For example, for structure 10 in Chapter 1, type
www.chemtube3d.com/weller7/1S10.
Index929
Detailed contents
Glossary of chemical abbreviations xxi 3.1 Symmetry operations, elements,
and point groups 63
4.17 Nonstoichiometric compounds and solid solutions 135 Redox stability 193
The electronic structures of solids 137 6.6 The influence of pH 193
4.18 The conductivities of inorganic solids 137 6.7 Reactions with water 194
4.19 Bands formed from overlapping atomic orbitals 138 6.8 Oxidation by atmospheric oxygen 196
4.20 Semiconduction 142 6.9 Disproportionation and comproportionation 196
Further information: the Born–Mayer equation 144 6.10 The influence of complexation 197
FURTHER READING 145 6.11 The relation between solubility and
EXERCISES 145 standard potentials 198
TUTORIAL PROBLEMS 148 Diagrammatic presentation of potential data 199
6.12 Latimer diagrams 199
5 Acids and bases 149 6.13 Frost diagrams 200
Brønsted acidity 150 6.14 Proton-coupled electron transfer:
5.1 Proton transfer equilibria in water 151 Pourbaix diagrams 204
5.14 The solvent system definition of acids 7.6 Polymetallic complexes 227
and bases 176 Isomerism and chirality 227
5.15 Solvents as acids and bases 176 7.7 Square-planar complexes 228
Applications of acid–base chemistry 180 7.8 Tetrahedral complexes 230
5.16 Superacids and superbases 180 7.9 Trigonal-bipyramidal and square-pyramidal
5.17 Heterogeneous acid–base reactions 180 complexes 230
24.12 Structures based on linked octahedral and 25.6 Design for energy efficiency 815
tetrahedral metal centres 758 25.7 Use of renewable feedstocks 816
24.13 Zeolites and microporous structures in 25.8 Reduce derivatives 817
heterogeneous catalysis 763
25.9 Catalysis 818
Hydrides and hydrogen-storage materials 765
25.10 Design for degradation 820
24.14 Metal hydrides 766
25.11 Real-time analysis for pollution prevention 821
24.15 Other inorganic hydrogen-storage materials 768
25.12 Inherently safer chemistry for accident prevention 821
Optical properties of inorganic materials 769
FURTHER READING 822
24.16 Coloured solids 770
EXERCISES 822
24.17 White and black pigments 771
TUTORIAL PROBLEMS 823
24.18 Photocatalysts 772
Semiconductor chemistry 773 26 Biological inorganic chemistry 824
24.19 Group 14 semiconductors 774 The organization of cells 825
24.20 Semiconductor systems isoelectronic with silicon 775 26.1 The physical structure of cells 825
xx Detailed contents
1
Foundations
The eight chapters in this part of the book lay the foundations of inorganic chemistry.
The first four chapters develop an understanding of the structures of atoms, the bonding in molecules
and solids, and the role symmetry plays in chemistry. Chapter 1 introduces the structure of atoms in
terms of quantum theory and describes important periodic trends in their properties. Chapter 2 devel-
ops molecular structure in terms of increasingly sophisticated models of covalent bonding and explores
how the energetics of reactions form the basis of understanding catalysis.
Chapter 3 shows how a systematic consideration of the symmetry of molecules can be used to discuss
the bonding and structure of molecules and help interpret data from some of the techniques described
in Chapter 8. Chapter 4 describes ionic bonding, the structures and properties of a range of typical sol-
ids, the role of defects in materials, and the electronic properties of solids.
The next two chapters focus on two major types of reactions. Chapter 5 explains how acid–base
properties are defined, measured, and applied across a wide area of chemistry. Chapter 6 describes oxi-
dation and reduction, and demonstrates how electrochemical data can be used to predict and explain
the outcomes of reactions in which electrons are transferred between molecules. Chapter 7 describes
the coordination compounds of the elements where we discuss bonding, structure, and reactions of
complexes, and see how symmetry considerations can provide insight into this important class of com-
pounds. Chapter 8 provides a toolbox for inorganic chemistry: it describes a wide range of the instru-
mental techniques that are used to identify and determine the structures and compositions of inorganic
compounds.
Atomic structure 1
The structures of hydrogenic atoms This chapter lays the foundations for the explanation of the trends
1.1 Spectroscopic information in the physical and chemical properties of all inorganic com-
1.2 Some principles of quantum mechanics pounds. To understand the behaviour of molecules and solids
1.3 Atomic orbitals we need to understand atoms: our study of inorganic chemistry
must therefore begin with a review of their structures and proper-
Many-electron atoms
ties. We start with a discussion of the origin of matter in the solar
1.4 Penetration and shielding
system and then consider the development of our understand-
1.5 The building-up principle
ing of atomic structure and the behaviour of electrons in atoms.
1.6 The classification of the elements
We introduce quantum theory qualitatively and use the results
1.7 Atomic properties
to rationalize properties such as atomic radii, ionization energy,
Further reading electron affinity, and electronegativity. A knowledge of these
properties allows us to begin to understand the diverse chemical
Exercises
properties of nearly 120 elements known today.
Tutorial problems
The observation that the universe is expanding has led to the in the form of H atoms (89%) and He atoms (11%). In one
current view that about 14 billion years ago the currently sense, not much has happened since then for, as Fig. 1.1
visible universe was concentrated into a point-like region shows, hydrogen and helium remain overwhelmingly the
that exploded in an event called the Big Bang. With initial most abundant elements in the universe. However, nuclear
temperatures immediately after the Big Bang of about 109 K, reactions have formed dozens of other elements and have
the fundamental particles produced in the explosion had too immeasurably enriched the variety of matter in the universe,
much kinetic energy to bind together in the forms we know and thus given rise to the whole area of chemistry (Boxes
today. However, the universe cooled as it expanded, the par- 1.2 and 1.3).
ticles moved more slowly, and they soon began to adhere Table 1.1 summarizes the properties of the subatomic
together under the influence of a variety of forces. In par- particles that we need to consider in chemistry. All the
ticular, the strong force, a short-range but powerful attrac- known elements—by 2018 all up to 118 had been con-
tive force between nucleons (protons and neutrons), bound firmed—that are formed from these subatomic particles are
these particles together into nuclei. As the temperature fell distinguished by their atomic number, Z, the number of
still further, the electromagnetic force, a relatively weak but protons in the nucleus of an atom of the element. Many
long-range force between electric charges, bound electrons elements have a number of isotopes, which are atoms with
to nuclei to form atoms, and the universe acquired the poten- the same atomic number but different atomic masses. These
tial for complex chemistry and the existence of life (Box 1.1). isotopes are distinguished by the mass number, A, which is
About two hours after the start of the universe, the the total number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus.
temperature had fallen so much that most of the matter was The mass number is also sometimes termed the nucleon
Those figures with an in the caption can be found online as interactive 3D Many of the numbered structures can also be found online as interactive 3D
structures. Type the following URL into your browser, adding the relevant figure structures: visit www.chemtube3d.com/weller7/[chapter number] for all 3D resources
number: www.chemtube3d.com/weller7/[chapter number]F[figure number]. For organized by chapter.
example, for Figure 3 in Chapter 7, type www.chemtube3d.com/weller7/7F03.
4 1 Atomic structure
The earliest stars resulted from the gravitational condensation mass and energy are related by E = mc 2 , where c is the speed
of clouds of H and He atoms. This gave rise to high temperatures of light. Therefore, if the mass of a nucleus differs from the
and densities within the clouds, and fusion reactions began as total mass of its components by ∆m = mnucleons − mnucleus , then its
nuclei merged together. binding energy is Ebind = ( ∆m)c 2 . The binding energy of 56Fe, for
Energy is released when light nuclei fuse together to give example, is the difference in energy between the 56Fe nucleus
elements of higher atomic number. Nuclear reactions are very and 26 protons and 30 neutrons. A positive binding energy
much more energetic than normal chemical reactions because corresponds to a nucleus that has a lower, more favourable,
the strong force which binds protons and neutrons together energy (and lower mass) than its constituent nucleons.
is much stronger than the electromagnetic force that binds Figure B1.1 shows the binding energy per nucleon, Ebind/A
electrons to nuclei. Whereas a typical chemical reaction might (obtained by dividing the total binding energy by the number
release about 103 kJ mol−1, a nuclear reaction typically releases a of nucleons), for all the isotopes. Iron and nickel occur at the
million times more energy, about 109 kJ mol−1. maximum of the curve, showing that their nucleons are bound
Elements up to Z = 26 (iron) were formed inside stars. These together more strongly than in any other nuclide. Harder to see
elements are the products of the nuclear fusion reactions from the graph is an alternation of binding energies as the atomic
referred to as ‘nuclear burning’. The burning reactions, which number varies from even to odd, with even-Z nuclides slightly
should not be confused with chemical combustion, involved more stable than their odd-Z neighbours. There is a corresponding
H and He nuclei and a complicated fusion cycle catalysed alternation in cosmic abundances, with nuclides of even atomic
by C nuclei. The stars that formed in the earliest stages of the number being marginally more abundant than those of odd
evolution of the cosmos lacked C nuclei and used noncatalysed atomic number. This stability of even-Z nuclides is attributed to
H-burning. Nucleosynthesis reactions are rapid at temperatures the lowering of energy by pairing nucleons in the nucleus.
of 5–10 × 106 K. Here we have another contrast between
chemical and nuclear reactions, because chemical reactions 16
O
12
C
take place at temperatures a hundred thousand times lower. 8
Fe
Moderately energetic collisions between atoms or molecules 4
He
can result in chemical change, but only highly vigorous Binding energy per nucleon / MeV 56
58
60
collisions can provide the energy required to bring about most 6 55
57
59
nuclear transformations.
The elements beyond iron ( Z > 26) are produced in significant Li
7
number. Hydrogen, for instance, has three isotopes. In radioactive isotope of hydrogen is tritium, 3H or T. Its
each case Z = 1, indicating that the nucleus contains one nucleus consists of one proton and two neutrons. In cer-
proton. The most abundant isotope has A = 1, denoted 1H, tain cases it is helpful to display the atomic number of the
its nucleus consisting of a single proton. Far less abundant element as a left suffix; so the three isotopes of hydrogen
(only 1 atom in 6000) is deuterium, with A = 2. This mass would then be denoted 11 H, 12H, and 13H. Hydrogen is the
number indicates that, in addition to a proton, the nucleus only element for which there are such significant chemical
contains one neutron. The formal designation of deuterium distinctions between the isotopes that the isotopes warrant
is 2H, but it is commonly denoted D. The third, short-lived, individual names.
Atomic structure 5
10
O Si
Ca Fe
H Earth's crust
6 Sr Ba
Pb
log (mass fraction, ppb)
Ar
He Ne
–2 Kr
Xe
Rn
–6
10 30 50 70 90
Atomic number, Z
11
Sun
O
H)
Fe
12
7
log (atoms per 10
F
3
Sc
Li
As FIGURE 1.1 The abundances of the elements in the
–1
10 30 50 70 90 Earth’s crust and the Sun. Elements with odd Z are less
Atomic number, Z stable than their neighbours with even Z.
If two nuclei with mass numbers lower than 56 merge to produce undergo fission into (among many other modes) xenon-140
a new nucleus with a larger nuclear binding energy, the excess and strontium-93 nuclei:
energy is released. This process is called fusion. For example,
two neon-20 nuclei may fuse to give a calcium-40 nucleus:
236
92
U → 140
54
Xe + 38
93
Sr + 3 01n
The values of Ebind/A for 236U, 140Xe, and 93Sr nuclei are 7.6, 8.4,
2 20 Ne → 40 Ca
10 20 and 8.7 MeV, respectively. Therefore, the energy released in this
The value of the binding energy per nucleon, Ebind/A, for 20Ne reaction is (140 × 8.4) + (93 × 8.7) − (236 × 7.6) MeV = 191.5 MeV
is approximately 8.0 MeV. Therefore, the total binding energy for the fission of each 236U nucleus.
of the species on the left-hand side of the equation is 2 × 20 × Fission can also be induced by bombarding heavy elements
8.0 MeV = 320 MeV. The value of Ebind/A for 40Ca is close to 8.6 MeV with neutrons:
and so the total energy of the species on the right-hand side is
40 × 8.6 MeV = 344 MeV. The difference in the binding energies
235
92
U + 01n → fission products + neutrons
of the products and reactants is therefore 24 MeV. The kinetic energy of fission products from 235U is about 165 MeV,
For nuclei with A > 56 , binding energy can be released when that of the neutrons is about 5 MeV, and the γ-rays produced have
they split into lighter products with higher values of Ebind/A. an energy of about 7 MeV. The fission products are themselves
This process is called fission. For example, uranium-236 can radioactive and decay by β-, γ-, and X-radiation, releasing about
6 1 Atomic structure
23 MeV. In a nuclear fission reactor the neutrons that are not long-lived spent fuel. The declining stocks of fossil fuels,
consumed by fission are captured with the release of about 10 MeV. however, make nuclear power very attractive as it is estimated
The energy produced is reduced by about 10 MeV, which escapes that stocks of uranium could last for hundreds of years. The cost
from the reactor as radiation, and about 1 MeV which remains of uranium ores is currently very low and 100 g of uranium oxide
as undecayed fission products in the spent fuel. Therefore, the generates as much energy as sixty barrels of oil or 20 tonnes of
total energy produced for one fission event is about 200 MeV, or coal. The increased use of nuclear power would also drastically
32 pJ. It follows that about 1 W of reactor heat (where 1 W = 1 J s −1) reduce the rate of emission of greenhouse gases into the
corresponds to about 3.1× 1010 fission events per second. A nuclear atmosphere. The environmental drawback with nuclear power
reactor producing 3 GW has an electrical output of approximately is the storage and disposal of radioactive waste and the public
1 GW and corresponds to the fission of 3 kg of 235U per day. are nervous about possible nuclear accidents, such as that in
The use of nuclear power is controversial in large part on Fukushima in 2011, and the misuse of nuclear capabilities in
account of the risks associated with the highly radioactive, pursuit of political ambitions.
A synthetic element is one that does not occur naturally on used in nuclear medicine, for example in radiopharmaceuticals
Earth but that can be artificially generated by nuclear reactions. for imaging and in functional studies of the brain, bones, blood,
The first synthetic element was technetium ( Tc, Z = 43), named lungs, liver, heart, thyroid gland, and kidneys (Section 27.9).
from the Greek word for ‘artificial’. Its discovery—or more Technetium-99m is generated through nuclear fission in nuclear
precisely, its preparation—filled a gap in the periodic table power plants but a more useful laboratory source of the isotope
and its properties matched those predicted by Mendeleev. The is a technetium generator, which uses the decay of 99Mo to 99mTc.
longest-lived isotope of technetium (98Tc) has a half-life of 4.2 The half-life of 99Mo is 66 hours, which makes it more
million years so any produced when the Earth was formed has convenient for transport and storage than 99mTc itself. Most
long since decayed. Technetium is produced in red-giant stars. commercial generators are based on 99Mo in the form of the
The most widely used isotope of technetium is 99mTc, where molybdate ion, MoO 24−, adsorbed on Al2O3. The 99 MoO 24− ion
the ‘m’ indicates a metastable isotope. Technetium-99m emits decays by beta emission to the pertechnetate ion, 99mTcO42−,
high-energy γ-rays but has a relatively short half-life of 6.01 which is less tightly bound to the alumina (Section 27.8).
hours. These properties make the isotope particularly attractive
for use in vivo as the γ-ray energy is sufficient for it to be
99
Mo → 99m Tc + −01 β
detected outside the body and its half-life means that most of it Sterile saline solution is washed through a column of the
will have decayed within 24 hours. Consequently, 99mTc is widely immobilized 99Mo and the 99mTc solution is collected.
Visible
λ /nm
2000
1000
800
600
500
400
300
200
150
120
100
Total
Balmer Lyman
Paschen
Brackett
FIGURE 1.2 The spectrum of atomic
hydrogen and its analysis into series.
8 1 Atomic structure
The emission of light when atoms are excited is put to good use on the neon and argon emit a red glow which heats the sodium
in lighting streets in many parts of the world. The widely used metal. Within a few minutes, the sodium starts to vaporize, the
yellow street lamps are based on the emission of light from electrical discharge excites electrons in the atoms to a high
excited sodium atoms. energy level, and they re-emit the energy as yellow light.
Low pressure sodium (LPS) lamps consist of a glass tube One advantage of these lamps over other types of street
coated with indium tin oxide (ITO). The indium tin oxide reflects lighting is that they do not lose light output as they age. They
infrared light and transmits visible light. Two inner glass tubes do, however, use more energy towards the end of their life
hold solid sodium and a small amount of neon and argon, the which may make them less attractive from environmental and
same mixture as found in neon lights. When the lamp is turned economic perspectives.
The question these observations raise is why the energy called photons yet at the same time exhibit wave-like prop-
of the electron in the atom is limited to the values −hcR/n2 erties, such as interference and diffraction, then the same
and why R has the value observed. An initial attempt to might be true of electrons. This dual nature is called wave–
explain these features was made by Niels Bohr in 1913 particle duality. An immediate consequence of duality is
using an early form of quantum theory in which he sup- that it is impossible to know the linear momentum (the
posed that the electron could exist in only certain circu- product of mass and velocity) and the location of an elec-
lar orbits. Although he obtained the correct value of R, tron (and any particle) simultaneously. This restriction is
his model was later shown to be untenable as it conflicted called the Heisenberg uncertainty principle that states that
with the version of quantum theory developed by Erwin the product of the uncertainty in momentum and the uncer-
Schrödinger and Werner Heisenberg in 1926. tainty in position cannot be less than a quantity of the order
of Planck’s constant (specifically, ½, where = /2π).1
Schrödinger formulated an equation that took account of
EXAMPLE 1.1 Predicting the wavelength of lines in wave–particle duality and accounted for the motion of elec-
the atomic spectrum of hydrogen trons in atoms. To do so, he introduced the wavefunction,
Predict the wavelengths of the first three lines in the Balmer ψ (psi), a mathematical function of the position coordinates
series. x, y, and z, which describes the behaviour of an electron.
The Schrödinger equation, of which the wavefunction is a
Answer For the Balmer series, n1 = 2 and n2 = 3, 4, 5, 6. So if
solution, for an electron free to move in one dimension is
1 1 1
we substitute into eqn 1.1 we obtain = R 2 − 2 for the first
λ 2 3
Kinetic energy
line which gives 1 513 888 m−1 or 661 nm. Using values of n2 = 4 contribution
Potential energy
contribution Total energy
and 5 for the next two lines give values of λ of 486 and 434 nm, dψ
2 2 (1.2)
respectively. − + V ( x )ψ (x ) = Eψ (x)
2me dx 2
(a)
Wavefunction, ψ
Wave 1 Resultant
Wave 2
Phase + −
(b)
Probability density, ψ 2
FIGURE 1.4 Wavefunctions interfere where they spread into the
FIGURE 1.3 The Born interpretation of the wavefunction is that
same region of space. (a) If they have the same sign in a region,
its square is a probability density. There is zero probability density
they interfere constructively and the total wavefunction has an
at a node. The shaded bar represents the probability density.
enhanced amplitude in the region. (b) If the wavefunctions have
opposite signs, then they interfere destructively, and the resulting
solutions exist only for certain values of E. Therefore, the superposition has a reduced amplitude.
quantization of energy, the fact that an electron can possess
only certain discrete energies in an atom, follows naturally close together, there may be a significantly enhanced prob-
from the Schrödinger equation. ability of finding the electrons in that region. Conversely, a
A wavefunction contains all the dynamical information positive region of one wavefunction may be cancelled by a
possible about the electron, including where it is and how negative region of the second wavefunction (Fig. 1.4b). This
fast it is travelling. As Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle destructive interference between wavefunctions reduces the
means it is impossible to know all this information simul- probability that an electron will be found in that region. As
taneously, this leads naturally to the concept of the prob- we shall see, the interference of wavefunctions is of great
ability of finding an electron at a given location. Specifically, importance in the explanation of chemical bonding.
the probability of finding an electron at a given location
is proportional to the square of the wavefunction at that
point, ψ 2. According to this interpretation, there is a high
1.3 Atomic orbitals
probability of finding the electron where ψ 2 is large, and the
electron will not be found where ψ 2 is zero (Fig. 1.3). The Chemists use hydrogenic atomic orbitals to develop models
quantity ψ 2 is called the probability density of the electron. that are central to the interpretation of inorganic chemistry,
It is a ‘density’ in the sense that the product of ψ 2 and the and we shall spend some time describing their shapes and
infinitesimal volume element dτ = dxdydz (where τ is tau) significance.
is proportional to the probability of finding the electron in
that volume. The probability is equal to ψ 2dτ if the wave- (a) Hydrogenic energy levels
function is ‘normalized’. A normalized wavefunction is one
KEY POINTS The energy of the bound electron is determined by n,
that is scaled so that the total probability of finding the elec- the principal quantum number; in addition, l specifies the magnitude
tron somewhere is 1. The wavefunction of an electron in an of the orbital angular momentum and ml specifies the orientation of
atom is called an atomic orbital. that angular momentum.
Like other waves, wavefunctions in general have regions
of positive and negative amplitude, or sign. To help keep Each of the wavefunctions obtained by solving the
track of the relative signs of different regions of a wavefunc- Schrödinger equation for a hydrogenic atom is uniquely
tion, or atomic orbital, in illustrations we label regions of labelled by a set of three integers called quantum numbers.
opposite sign with dark and light shading corresponding to These quantum numbers are designated n, l, and ml: n is
+ and − signs, respectively. The sign of the wavefunction is of called the principal quantum number, l is the orbital angu-
crucial importance when two wavefunctions spread into the lar momentum quantum number (formerly the ‘azimuthal
same region of space and interact. Then a positive region of quantum number’), and ml is called the magnetic quantum
one wavefunction may add to a positive region of the other number. Each quantum number specifies a physical property
wavefunction to give a region of enhanced amplitude. This of the electron: n specifies the energy, l labels the magnitude
enhancement is called constructive interference (Fig. 1.4a). of the orbital angular momentum, and ml labels the orienta-
It means that, where the two wavefunctions spread into the tion of that angular momentum. The value of n also indicates
same region of space, such as occurs when two atoms are the size of the orbital, with larger n, high-energy orbitals,
10 1 Atomic structure
Energy
mee4
R= (1.4)
8h3cε02
The energies given by eqn 1.3 are all negative, signifying In a hydrogenic atom, all orbitals with the same value of
that the energy of the electron in a bound state is lower than n have the same energy and are said to be degenerate. The
a widely separated stationary electron and nucleus. The zero principal quantum number therefore defines a series of
of energy (at n = ∞) corresponds to the electron and nucleus shells of the atom, or sets of orbitals with the same value
being widely separated and stationary. Positive values of of n and hence with the same energy and approximately
the energy correspond to unbound states of the electron in the same radial extent. Shells with n = 1, 2, 3, . . . are some-
which it may travel with any velocity and hence possess any times referred to as K, L, M, . . . shells, for example when
energy. Finally, because the energy is proportional to 1/n2, electronic transitions between these shells are referred to in
the energy levels in the bound state converge as the energy X-ray spectroscopy.
increases (becomes less negative, Fig. 1.5). The orbitals belonging to each shell are classified into
The value of l specifies the magnitude of the orbital angu- subshells distinguished by a quantum number l. For a
lar momentum through {l (l + 1)}1/2 , with l = 0, 1, 2, . . .. We given value of n, the quantum number l can have the val-
can think of l as indicating the momentum with which the ues l = 0, 1, . . ., n − 1, giving n different values in all. For
electron circulates around the nucleus via the lobes of the example, the shell with n = 1 consists of just one subshell
orbital. As we shall see shortly, the third quantum number with l = 0 , the shell with n = 2 consists of two subshells,
ml specifies the orientation of this momentum, for instance one with l = 0 and the other with l = 1, the shell with n = 3
whether the circulation is clockwise or anticlockwise. consists of three subshells, with values of l of 0, 1, and
2. It is common practice to refer to each subshell by a
(b) Shells, subshells, and orbitals letter:
KEY POINTS All orbitals with a given value of n belong to the same
Value of l 0 1 2 3 4 ...
shell, all orbitals of a given shell with the same value of l belong to the
same subshell, and individual orbitals are distinguished by the value of ml. Subshell designation s p d f g ...
The structures of hydrogenic atoms 11
For most purposes in chemistry we need consider only s, p, Subshells
d, and f subshells.2 s p d f
A subshell with quantum number l consists of 2l + 1 indi- 4
vidual orbitals. These orbitals are distinguished by the mag-
3
netic quantum number, ml, which can have the 2l + 1 integer
Shell
values from +l down to −l. This quantum number speci- 2
fies the component of orbital angular momentum around
1
an arbitrary axis (commonly designated z) passing through
the nucleus. So, for example, a d subshell of an atom (l = 2) FIGURE 1.6 The classification of orbitals into subshells (same
consists of five individual atomic orbitals that are distin- value of l) and shells (same value of n).
guished by the values ml = +2, + 1, 0, − 1, − 2. An f subshell
(l = 3) consists of seven individual atomic orbitals with the In addition to the three quantum numbers required to spec-
values ml = +3, + 2, + 1, 0, − 1, − 2, − 3. ify the spatial distribution of an electron in a hydrogenic
atom, two more quantum numbers are needed to define the
state of an electron. These additional quantum numbers
A NOTE ON GOOD PRACTICE
relate to the intrinsic angular momentum of an electron, its
Write the sign of ml even when it is positive. Thus, we write
spin. This evocative name suggests that an electron can be
ml = +2 , not ml = 2 .
regarded as having an angular momentum arising from a
spinning motion, rather like the daily rotation of the earth
The practical conclusion for chemistry from these rules as it travels in its annual orbit around the sun. However,
is that there is only one orbital in an s subshell (l = 0), the spin is a quantum mechanical property and this analogy
one with ml = 0: this orbital is called an s orbital. There are must be viewed with great caution.
three orbitals in a p subshell (l = 1), with quantum numbers Spin is described by two quantum numbers, s and ms.
ml = +1, 0, − 1; they are called p orbitals. The five orbitals of The former is the analogue of l for orbital motion but it
a d subshell (l = 2) are called d orbitals, with quantum num- is restricted to the single, unchangeable value s = ½. The
bers ml = + 2, + 1, 0, − 1, − 2 and so on (Fig. 1.6). magnitude of the spin angular momentum is given by the
expression {s(s + 1)}1/2, so when we substitute for s = ½ we
find that this magnitude is fixed at 12 3 for any electron.
EXAMPLE 1.2 Identifying orbitals from quantum The second quantum number, the spin magnetic quantum
numbers
number, ms, may take only two values, +½ (anticlockwise
Which set of orbitals is defined by n = 4 and l = 1? How many spin, imagined from above) and −½ (clockwise spin). The
orbitals are there in this set? two states are often represented by the two arrows ↑ (‘spin-
Answer We need to remember that the principal quantum up’, ms = + 12 ) and ↓ (‘spin-down’, ms = − 12 ) or by the Greek
number n identifies the shell and that the orbital quantum letters α and β, respectively.
number l identifies the subshell. The subshell with l = 1 consists Because the spin state of an electron must be specified if
of p orbitals. The allowed values of ml = +l, . . ., −l give the number the state of the atom is to be specified fully, it is common
of orbitals of that type. In this case, ml = +1, 0, and −1. There are to say that the state of an electron in a hydrogenic atom is
therefore three 4p orbitals. characterized by four quantum numbers, namely n, l, ml,
Self-test 1.2 (a) Which set of orbitals is defined by the quantum and ms.
numbers n = 3 and l = 2? How many orbitals are there in this
set? (b) What are the quantum numbers n and l that define a 5f (d) Nodes
orbital? How many orbitals are there in this set?
KEY POINT Regions where wavefunctions pass through zero are
called nodes. Inorganic chemists generally find it adequate to use visu-
al representations of atomic orbitals rather than mathematical expres-
(c) Electron spin sions. However, we need to be aware of the mathematical expressions
KEY POINTS The intrinsic spin angular momentum of an electron is that underlie these representations.
defined by the two quantum numbers s and ms. Four quantum numbers
are needed to define the state of an electron in a hydrogenic atom. Because the potential energy of an electron in the field of a
nucleus is spherically symmetric (it is proportional to Z/r
2
The orbital labels s, p, d, and f come from terms used to describe and independent of orientation relative to the nucleus), the
groups of lines in the atomic spectra. They stand for sharp, principal, orbitals are best expressed in terms of the spherical polar
diffuse, and fundamental, respectively. coordinates defined in Fig. 1.7, rather than the Cartesian
12 1 Atomic structure
z
1.8
θ
ϕ
2
3/
Radial wavefunction, R/(Z/a0)
r
y 1.2
x 0.6
1s
Figures 1.8 and 1.9 show the radial variations of some 0.8
R2
3s
r2
2s
1s 0 1 2 3 4 5
Radius, Zr/a0 Radius, Zr/a0
FIGURE 1.10 The 1s, 2s, and 3s orbitals showing the radial nodes. FIGURE 1.11 The radial distribution function, r2R2, of a hydrogenic
1s orbital. r2R2 is the product of r2 (which increases as r increases)
and the square of the radial component of the wavefunction Ψ
EXAMPLE 1.3 Predicting numbers of radial nodes (labelled R2 in the figure and which decreases exponentially). The
radial distribution function passes through a maximum at r = a0/Z.
How many radial nodes do 3p, 3d, and 4f orbitals each have?
Answer We need to make use of the fact that the number of (For s orbitals, this expression is the same as P = 4πr2ψ 2.)
radial nodes is given by the expression n − l − 1 and use it to If we know the value of P at some radius r, then we can
find the number of radial nodes using values of n and l. The 3p state the probability of finding the electron somewhere in
orbitals have n = 3 and l = 1 and so the number of radial nodes
a shell of thickness dr at that radius simply by multiplying
is n − l − 1 = 1. The 3d orbitals have n = 3 and l = 2. Therefore, the
P by dr.
number of radial nodes is n − l − 1 = 0. The 4f orbitals have n =
Because the wavefunction of a 1s orbital decreases expo-
4 and l = 3 and the number of radial nodes is n − l − 1 = 0. The
3d and 4f orbitals are the first occurrence of the d and f orbitals nentially with distance from the nucleus and the factor r2
so this also indicates that they will have no radial node. The 3p in eqn 1.6 increases, the radial distribution function of a
orbitals are the second occurrence of the p orbitals and so we 1s orbital goes through a maximum (Fig. 1.11). Therefore,
would expect them to have one radial node. there is a distance at which the electron is most likely to
be found. In general, this most probable distance decreases
Self-test 1.3 (a) How many radial nodes does a 5s orbital have?
as the nuclear charge increases (because the electron is
(b) Which p orbital has two radial nodes?
attracted more strongly to the nucleus), and specifically
a0
rmax = (1.7)
(f) The radial distribution function Z
KEY POINT A radial distribution function gives the probability that an where a0 is the Bohr radius, a0 = ε02/πmee2, a quantity that
electron will be found at a given distance from the nucleus, regardless appeared in Bohr’s formulation of his model of the atom;
of the direction.
its numerical value is 52.9 pm. The most probable distance
increases as n increases because the higher the energy, the
The Coulombic (electrostatic) force that binds the electron more likely it is that the electron will be found far from the
is centred on the nucleus, so it is often of interest to know nucleus.
the probability of finding an electron at a given distance
from the nucleus, regardless of its direction. This informa-
EXAMPLE 1.4 Interpreting radial distribution
tion enables us to judge how tightly the electron is bound. functions
The total probability of finding the electron in a spherical
shell of radius r and thickness dr is the integral of ψ 2dτ over Figure 1.12 shows the radial distribution functions for 2s and 2p
hydrogenic orbitals. Which orbital gives the electron a greater
all angles. This result is written P(r)dr, where P(r) is called
probability of close approach to the nucleus?
the radial distribution function. In general,
Answer By examining Fig. 1.12 we can see that the radial
P(r) = r2R(r)2(1.6) distribution function of a 2p orbital approaches zero near
14 1 Atomic structure
nucleus (note where its maximum lies), an electron in a 2s orbital looks different from the remaining d orbitals. There
orbital has a high probability of being close to the nucleus on are in fact six possible combinations of double dumb-bell
account of the inner maximum.
shaped orbitals around three axes: three with lobes between
the axes, as in dxy, dyz, and dzx, and three with lobes along the
(g) The angular variation of atomic orbitals axis. However, only five d orbitals are allowed. One of these
orbitals is assigned d x − y and lies along the x and y axes. The
2 2
KEY POINTS The boundary surface of an orbital indicates the region
remaining orbital is the d2 z − x − y from the algebra which is
of space within which the electron is most likely to be found; orbitals 2 2 2
with the quantum number l have l nodal planes. simplified to d z and can be thought of as the superposition
2
The angular wavefunction expresses the variation of angle the d z − x . Note that a d orbital (with l = 2) has two nodal
2 2
around the nucleus and this describes the orbital’s angu- planes that intersect at the nucleus; a typical f orbital (l = 3)
lar shape. An s orbital has the same amplitude at a given has three nodal planes.
distance from the nucleus whatever the angular coordi-
nates of the point of interest: that is, an s orbital is spheri-
z z z
cally symmetrical. The orbital is normally represented
by a spherical surface with the nucleus at its centre. The
+
surface is called the boundary surface of the orbital, and − − y
+
defines the region of space within which there is a high + y
y
(typically 90%) probability of finding the electron. This x x −
x
boundary surface is what chemists draw to represent the
shape of an orbital. The planes on which the angular wave- px py pz
function passes through zero are called angular nodes or FIGURE 1.14 The representation of the boundary surfaces of the
nodal planes. An electron will not be found anywhere on p orbitals. Each orbital has one nodal plane running through the
a nodal plane. A nodal plane cuts through the nucleus and nucleus. For example, the nodal plane of the pz orbital is the xy-
separates the regions of positive and negative sign of the plane. The darkly shaded lobe has a positive amplitude, the more
wavefunction. lightly shaded one is negative.
Many-electron atoms 15
z
y
x
dx2–y2
dz2
x y fy3–3yx2
f5z3–3zr2 f5xz2–3xr2
f5yz2–yr2
Many-electron atoms
As we have remarked, a ‘many-electron atom’ is an atom 1.4 Penetration and shielding
with more than one electron, so even He, with two elec-
KEY POINTS The ground-state electron configuration is a specifica-
trons, is technically a many-electron atom. The exact tion of the orbital occupation of an atom in its lowest energy state. The
solution of the Schrödinger equation for an atom with exclusion principle forbids more than two electrons to occupy a single
N electrons would be a function of the 3N coordinates orbital. The nuclear charge experienced by an electron is reduced by
of all the electrons. It would be extremely challenging shielding by other electrons, including those in the same shell. Trends
to find exact formulas for such complicated functions; in effective nuclear charge can be used to rationalize the trends in
however, it is straightforward to perform numerical many properties. As a result of the combined effects of penetration and
computations by using widely available software to shielding, the order of energy levels in a shell of a many-electron atom
obtain precise energies and probability densities. This is s < p < d < f.
software can also generate graphical representations of
the resulting orbitals that can assist in the interpreta- It is quite easy to account for the electronic structure of the
tion of the properties of the atom. For most of inorganic helium atom in its ground state, its state of lowest energy.
chemistry we rely on the orbital approximation, in which According to the orbital approximation, we suppose that
each electron occupies an atomic orbital that resembles both electrons occupy an atomic orbital that has the same
those found in hydrogenic atoms. When we say that an spherical shape as a hydrogenic 1s orbital. However, the
electron ‘occupies’ an atomic orbital, we mean that it is orbital will be more compact because, as the nuclear charge
described by the corresponding wavefunction and set of of helium is greater than that of hydrogen, the electrons are
quantum numbers. drawn in towards the nucleus more closely than is the one
16 1 Atomic structure
electron of an H atom. The ground-state configuration of negative charge reduces the actual charge of the nucleus, Z,
an atom is a statement of the orbitals its electrons occupy to Zeff, where Zeff is called the effective nuclear charge.
in the ground state. For helium, with two electrons in the 1s This effective nuclear charge depends on the values of n
orbital, the ground-state configuration is denoted 1s2 (read and l of the electron of interest because electrons in differ-
as ‘one s two’). ent shells and subshells approach the nucleus to different
As soon as we come to the next atom in the periodic table, extents. The reduction of the true nuclear charge to the effec-
lithium (Z = 3), we encounter several major new features. tive nuclear charge by the other electrons is called shield-
The configuration 1s3 is forbidden by a fundamental feature ing. The effective nuclear charge is sometimes expressed in
of nature known as the Pauli exclusion principle: terms of the true nuclear charge and an empirical shielding
constant, σ, by writing Zeff = Z − σ. The shielding constant
No more than two electrons may occupy a single orbital
can be determined by fitting hydrogenic orbitals to those
and, if two do occupy a single orbital, then their spins
computed numerically. It can also be approximated by using
must be paired.
the empirical set of rules, Slater’s rules.
By ‘paired’ we mean that one electron spin must be ↑ Slater’s rules attribute a numerical contribution to elec-
(ms = +½) and the other ↓ (ms = −½); the pair is denoted trons in an atom in the following way:
↑↓. Another way of expressing the principle is to note that, Write out the electron configuration of the atom and
because an electron in an atom is described by four variable group orbitals together in the form
quantum numbers, n, l, ml, and ms, no two electrons can
(1s)(2s2p)(3s3p)(3d)(4s4p)(4d)(4f)(5s5p) etc.
have the same four quantum numbers. The Pauli principle
was introduced originally to account for the absence of cer- If the outermost electron is in an s or p orbital,
tain transitions in the spectrum of atomic helium.
Because the configuration 1s3 is forbidden by the Pauli Each of the other electrons in the (ns np) grouping con-
exclusion principle, the third electron must occupy an orbital tributes 0.35 to σ;
of the next higher shell, the shell with n = 2. The question Each electron in the n − 1 shell contributes 0.85 to σ;
that now arises is whether the third electron occupies a 2s Each electron in lower shells contributes 1.0 to σ.
orbital or one of the three 2p orbitals. To answer this ques-
tion, we need to examine the energies of the two subshells If the outermost electron is in a d or f orbital,
and the effect of the other electrons in the atom. Although
2s and 2p orbitals have the same energy in a hydrogenic Each of the other electrons in the (nd) or (nf) grouping
atom, spectroscopic data and calculations show that this is contributes 0.35 to σ;
not the case in a many-electron atom. Each electron in lower shells or earlier groupings contrib-
In the orbital approximation, we treat the repulsion utes 1.0 to σ.
between electrons in an approximate manner by supposing
that the electronic charge is distributed spherically around For example, to calculate the shielding constant for the out-
the nucleus. Then each electron moves in the attractive field ermost electron, and hence the effective nuclear charge of
of the nucleus and also experiences an average repulsive fluorine, F, we first write down the electron configuration
charge from the other electrons. According to classical elec- with appropriate groupings:
trostatics, the field that arises from a spherical distribution
(1s2)(2s22p5)
of charge is equivalent to the field generated by a single
point charge at the centre of the distribution (Fig. 1.17). This Then σ = (6 × 0.35) + (2 × 0.85) = 3.80 and, therefore, Zeff = Z − σ
= 9 − 3.80 = 5.20. The values of Zeff calculated this way are not
Charge does the same as those given in Table 1.2 although they do follow the
not contribute
same pattern. The Slater model is an approximation and does
not, of course, take into account the difference between s and
p orbitals or the effects of spin correlation (Section 1.5a).
r
H He
4f
4d
Z 1 2 4p
4s Z < 21
1s 1.00 1.69 3p Z ≥ 21
3s 3d
Li Be B C N O F Ne 2p
Energy
Z 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
2s
1s 2.69 3.68 4.68 5.67 6.66 7.66 8.65 9.64
2s 1.28 1.91 2.58 3.22 3.85 4.49 5.13 5.76
2p 2.42 3.14 3.83 4.45 5.10 5.76
Na Mg Al Si P S Cl Ar
Z 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
1s
1s 10.63 11.61 12.59 13.57 14.56 15.54 16.52 17.51
2s 6.57 7.39 8.21 9.02 9.82 10.63 11.43 12.23 FIGURE 1.19 A schematic diagram of the energy levels of a
2p 6.80 7.83 8.96 9.94 10.96 11.98 12.99 14.01 many-electron atom with Z < 21 (as far as calcium). There is a
change in order for Z ≥ 21 (from scandium onwards). This is the
3s 2.51 3.31 4.12 4.90 5.64 6.37 7.07 7.76
diagram that justifies the building-up principle, with up to two
3p 4.07 4.29 4.89 5.48 6.12 6.76 electrons being allowed to occupy each orbital.
18 1 Atomic structure
K
3d Ca 4p
n
5
Sc
4s
Ti
4
V
Energy
2
Figure 1.20 summarizes the energies of the orbitals Self-test 1.6 (a) Account for the larger increase in effective
through the periodic table. The effects are quite subtle, nuclear charge for a 2p electron on going from B to C compared
with a 2s electron on going from Li to Be. (b) Account for the
and the order of the orbitals depends strongly on the
increase in effective nuclear charge on going from B to Al.
numbers of electrons present in the atom and may change
on ionization. For example, the effects of penetration are
very pronounced for 4s electrons in K and Ca, and in
1.5 The building-up principle
these atoms the 4s orbitals lie lower in energy than the
3d orbitals. However, from Sc through Zn, the 3d orbit- The ground-state electron configurations of many-electron
als in the neutral atoms lie close to but lower than the atoms are determined experimentally by spectroscopy and
4s orbitals. In atoms from Ga (Z ≥ 31) onwards, the 3d are summarized in Resource section 2. To account for them,
orbitals lie well below the 4s orbital in energy, and the we need to consider both the effects of penetration and
outermost electrons are unambiguously those of the 4s shielding on the energies of the orbitals and the role of the
and 4p subshells. Pauli exclusion principle. The building-up principle (which
is also known as the Aufbau principle and is described
below) is a procedure that leads to plausible ground-state
EXAMPLE 1.6 Accounting for trends in effective configurations. It is not infallible, but it is an excellent start-
nuclear charge
ing point for the discussion. Moreover, as we shall see, it
From Table 1.2 the increase in Zeff (2p) between C and N is provides a theoretical framework for understanding the
0.69 whereas the increase between N and O (2p) is only 0.62. structure and implications of the periodic table.
Suggest a reason why the increase in Zeff for a 2p electron
is smaller between N and O than between C and N given the (a) Ground-state electron configurations
configurations of the atoms listed above.
KEY POINTS The order of occupation of atomic orbitals follows the
Answer We need to identify the general trend and then think order 1s, 2s, 2p, 3s, 3p, 4s, 3d, 4p, . . .. Degenerate orbitals are occupied
about an additional effect that might modify it. In this case, we singly before being doubly occupied; certain modifications of the order
expect to see an increase in effective nuclear charge across a of occupation occur for d and f orbitals.
period and indeed we do. However, on going from C to N, the
additional electron occupies an empty 2p orbital whereas on According to the building-up principle, orbitals of neutral
going from N to O, the additional electron must occupy a 2p atoms are treated as being occupied in the order determined
orbital that is already occupied by one electron. It therefore
in part by the principal quantum number and in part by
experiences stronger electron–electron repulsion. Electron–
penetration and shielding:
electron repulsion contributes to the overall shielding effect
and so the increase in Zeff is not as great. Order of occupation: 1s 2s 2p 3s 3p 4s 3d 4p . . .
Many-electron atoms 19
Each orbital can accommodate up to two electrons. Thus, It is arbitrary which of the p orbitals of a subshell is occu-
the three orbitals in a p subshell can accommodate a total of pied first because they are degenerate, but it is common to
six electrons and the five orbitals in a d subshell can accom- adopt the alphabetical order px, py, pz. It then follows from
modate up to ten electrons. The ground-state configurations the building-up principle that the ground-state configura-
of the first five elements are therefore expected to be tion of C is 1s22s22px12p1y or, more simply, 1s22s22p2. If we
recognize the helium-like core (1s2), an even briefer notation
H He Li Be B
is [He]2s22p2, and we can think of the electronic valence
1s 1
1s2
1s 2s2 1
1s 2s
2 2
1s22s22p1 structure of the atom as consisting of two paired 2s elec-
This order agrees with experiment. When more than one trons and two parallel 2p electrons surrounding a closed
orbital of the same energy is available for occupation, such helium-like core. The electron configurations of the remain-
as when the 2p orbitals begin to be filled in boron and car- ing elements in the period are similarly
bon, we adopt Hund’s rule:
C N O F Ne
When more than one orbital has the same energy, elec- [He]2s 2p [He]2s 2p [He]2s 2p [He]2s 2p
2 2 2 3 2 4 2 5
[He]2s22p6
trons occupy separate orbitals and do so with parallel
spins (↑↑).
The 2s22p6 configuration of neon is another example of a
The occupation of separate orbitals of the same value closed shell, a shell with its full complement of electrons.
of l (such as a px orbital and a py orbital) can be under- The configuration 1s22s22p6 is denoted [Ne] when it occurs
stood in terms of the weaker repulsive interactions that as a core.
exist between electrons occupying different regions of The ground-state configuration of Na is obtained by adding
space (electrons in different orbitals) than between those one more electron to a neon-like core, and is [Ne]3s1, showing
occupying the same region of space (electrons in the same that it consists of a single electron outside a completely filled
orbital). The requirement of parallel spins for electrons 1s22s22p6 core. Now a similar sequence of filling subshells
that do occupy different orbitals is a consequence of a begins again, with the 3s and 3p orbitals complete at argon,
quantum mechanical effect called spin correlation, the ten- with configuration [Ne]3s23p6, which can be denoted [Ar].
dency for two electrons with parallel spins to stay apart Because the 3d orbitals are so much higher in energy, this
from one another and hence to repel each other less. The configuration is effectively closed. Moreover, the 4s orbital is
energy associated with this effect is called the correlation next in line for occupation, so the configuration of K is analo-
energy. An additional factor that stabilizes arrangements gous to that of Na, with a single electron outside a noble-gas
of electrons with parallel spins is an exchange energy. The core: specifically, it is [Ar]4s1. The next electron, for Ca, also
exchange energy is the extra stability that a parallel spin enters the 4s orbital, giving [Ar]4s2, which is the analogue
configuration (↑↑) gains because the electrons are indistin- of Mg. However, in the next element, Sc, the added electron
guishable and interchangeable. When two electrons with occupies a 3d orbital, and filling of the d orbitals begins.
parallel spins exchange positions in degenerate orbitals,
energy is released. If one of the electrons of a pair with (b) Exceptions
parallel spins is removed then this exchange energy is lost. The energy levels in Figs 1.19 and 1.20 are for individual
Consequently, arrangements of electrons in degenerate atomic orbitals and do not fully take into account repulsion
orbitals with large numbers of parallel spins are stabilized between electrons. For elements with an incompletely filled
relative to those without. The highest exchange energy d subshell, the determination of actual ground states by
occurs with a half-filled shell when the largest number of spectroscopy and calculation shows that it is advantageous
electrons with parallel spins exists. The consequence of to occupy orbitals predicted to be higher in energy (the 4s
this is that half-filled shells, such as p3, d5, and f7, are par- orbitals). The explanation for this order is that the occupa-
ticularly stable arrangements as removing an electron from tion of the 4s orbitals can result in a reduction in the repul-
these configurations requires the input of energy to over- sions between electrons that would occur if the 3d orbitals
come the greatest amount of exchange energy. Removing were occupied. It is essential when assessing the total energy
one electron from the d5 configuration (↑↑↑↑↑) to give of the electrons to consider all contributions to the energy
(↑↑↑↑) reduces the number of pairs of electrons with of a configuration, not merely the one-electron orbital ener-
parallel spins, and hence the possible number of electron gies. Spectroscopic data show that the ground-state configu-
exchanges, from 10 to 6 if each possible pair of electrons rations of these atoms, the first row transition metals, are
is considered. One result of this preference for arrange- mostly of the form 3dn4s2, with the 4s orbitals fully occupied
ments with half-filled shells is that the ground state of the despite individual 3d orbitals being lower in energy.
chromium atom is 4s13d5 rather than 4s23d4 as the former An additional feature, another consequence of spin cor-
maximizes the exchange energy. relation and exchange energies, is that in some cases a lower
20 1 Atomic structure
total energy may be obtained by forming a half-filled or 1.6 The classification of the elements
filled d subshell, even though that may mean moving an
KEY POINTS The elements are broadly divided into metals, nonmet-
s electron into the d subshell. Therefore, as a half-filled d
als, and metalloids according to their physical and chemical properties;
shell is approached the ground-state configuration is likely the organization of elements into the form resembling the modern pe-
to be d5s1 and not d4s2 (as for Cr). As a full d subshell is riodic table is accredited to Mendeleev.
approached the configuration is likely to be d10s1 rather
than d9s2 (as for Cu) or d10s0 rather than d8s2 (as for Pd). A useful broad division of elements is into metals and non-
A similar effect occurs where f orbitals are being occupied, metals. Metallic elements (such as iron and copper) are
and a d electron may be moved into the f subshell so as to typically lustrous, malleable, ductile, electrically conduct-
achieve an f7 or an f14 configuration, with a net lowering ing solids at about room temperature. Nonmetals are often
of energy. gases (oxygen), liquids (bromine), or solids that do not
For cations and complexes of the d-block elements the conduct electricity appreciably (sulfur). The chemical impli-
removal of electrons reduces the effect of electron–elec- cations of this classification should already be clear from
tron repulsions and the 3d orbital energies fall well below introductory chemistry:
that of the 4s orbitals. Consequently, all d-block cations
1. Metallic elements combine with nonmetallic elements to
and complexes have dn configurations and no electron in
give compounds that are typically hard, nonvolatile sol-
the outermost s orbital. For example, the configuration of
ids (for example sodium chloride).
Fe is [Ar]3d64s2 whereas in [Fe(CO)5] the configuration
is [Ar]3d8 and Fe2+ has the configuration [Ar]3d6. For the 2. When combined with each other, the nonmetals often
purposes of chemistry, the electron configurations of the form volatile molecular compounds (for example carbon
d-block ions are more important than those of the neu- dioxide).
tral atoms. In later chapters (starting in Chapter 19), we 3. When metals combine (or simply mix together) they
shall see the great significance of the configurations of the produce alloys that have most of the physical charac-
d-metal ions, for the subtle modulations of their energies teristics of metals (for example brass from copper and
provide the basis for the explanations of important proper- zinc).
ties of their compounds.
Some elements have properties that make it difficult to clas-
sify them as metals or nonmetals. These elements are called
metalloids. Examples of metalloids are silicon, germanium,
EXAMPLE 1.7 Deriving an electron configuration
arsenic, and tellurium.
Predict the ground-state electron configurations of (a) P, (b) Ti,
and (c) Ti3+.
A NOTE ON GOOD PRACTICE
Answer We need to use the building-up principle and Hund’s You will sometimes see metalloids referred to as ‘semimetals’.
rule to populate atomic orbitals with electrons. (a) For the P This name is best avoided because a semimetal has a well-
atom, for which Z = 15, we must add 15 electrons in the order defined and quite distinct meaning in solid state physics (see
specified above, with no more than two electrons in any one Section 4.19).
orbital. This procedure results in the configuration [Ne]3s23p3
with the three 3p electrons each in a different p orbital with
parallel spins. (b) For the neutral Ti atom, for which Z = 22, (a) The periodic table
we must add 22 electrons in the order specified above, with A more detailed classification of the elements is the one
no more than two electrons in any one orbital. This results
devised by Dmitri Mendeleev in 1869; this scheme is famil-
in the configuration [Ar]4s23d2, with the two 3d electrons in
iar to every chemist, and many non-chemists, as the periodic
different orbitals with parallel spins. However, because the
table. Mendeleev arranged the known elements in order of
3d orbitals lie below the 4s orbitals for elements beyond Ca,
it is usual to reverse the order in which they are written. The increasing atomic weight (molar mass). This arrangement
configuration is therefore reported as [Ar]3d24s2. (c) The Ti resulted in families of elements with similar chemical prop-
cation has 19 electrons. We should fill the orbitals in the order erties, which he arranged into the groups of the periodic
specified above remembering, however, that the cation will table. For example, the fact that C, Si, Ge, and Sn all form
have a dn configuration and no electrons in the s orbital. The hydrides of the general formula EH4 suggests that they
configuration of Ti3+ is therefore [Ar]3d1. belong to the same group. That N, P, As, and Sb all form
Self-test 1.7 (a) Predict the ground-state electron configurations hydrides with the general formula EH3 suggests that they
of Ni and Ni2+. (b) Predict the ground-state electron configurations belong to a different group. Other compounds of these ele-
of Cu, Cu+, and Cu2+. ments show family similarities, as in the formulas CF4 and
SiF4 in the first group, and NF3 and PF3 in the second.
Many-electron atoms 21
Cs
70
60
Rb
)
–1
50 K
Molar atomic volume / (cm mol
Xe
3
40
He Kr
Eu
30
Yb
Na Ar Po
20 Cm
U
10
B
0
10 30 50 70 90 FIGURE 1.21 The periodic variation of molar
Atomic number, Z volume with atomic number.
Mendeleev concentrated on the chemical properties of the know do exist, but that is overshadowed by his positive
elements. At about the same time Lothar Meyer in Germany achievement.) The same process of inference from periodic
was investigating their physical properties, and found that trends is still used by inorganic chemists to rationalize trends
similar values repeated periodically with increasing molar in the physical and chemical properties of compounds and
mass. Figure 1.21 shows a classic example, where the molar to suggest the synthesis of previously unknown compounds.
volume of the element (its volume per mole of atoms) at 1 For instance, by recognizing that carbon and silicon are in
bar and 298 K is plotted against atomic number. the same family, the existence of alkenes R2C=CR2 suggests
Mendeleev provided a spectacular demonstration of the that R2Si=SiR2 ought to exist too. Compounds with silicon–
usefulness of the periodic table by predicting the general silicon double bonds (disilaethenes) do indeed exist, but
chemical properties, such as the numbers of bonds they it was not until 1981 that chemists succeeded in isolating
form, of unknown elements such as gallium, germanium one. The periodic trends in the properties of the elements
and scandium corresponding to gaps in his original periodic are explored further in Chapter 9. The periodic table is an
table. (He also predicted elements that we now know can- iconic and evolving representation of the known elements
not exist, and denied the presence of elements that we now and is still being added to today (Box 1.5).
In January 2016 the International Union of Pure and Applied can be based on a mythological concept, a mineral, a person, a
Chemistry (IUPAC) announced the discovery of four new place or a property and should have an ending that fits in with
elements, so completing the seventh row of the periodic table. other elements in the appropriate part of the periodic table. For
These were elements with atomic numbers 113, 115, 117, and example, elements in groups 1 to 16 must end in ‘ium’, those
118 and were given the temporary, and rather uninspiring, in group 17 would end in ‘ine’ and those in group 18 must end
names ununtrium, Uut, ununpentium, UUp, ununseptimum, in ‘on’.
Uus, and ununoctium, Uuo. They have since been named as Element 113 was synthesized in Japan and its discoverers
nihonium, Nh, muscovium, Mc, tennessine, Ts, and organesson, suggested the name nihonium to reflect that. Nihon is one
Og. The procedures for naming new elements are clearly laid of two ways to say ‘Japan’ and means ‘land of the rising
out by IUPAC. The claim for the discovery of a new element sun’. Nihonium is the first element to be discovered in Asia.
is verified by IUPAC and the International Union of Pure and Similarly, elements 114 and 117 were named in honour of the
Applied Physics (IUPAP) and then formally assigned to a group geographical regions in which their discoverers carried out their
of scientists or a laboratory. The IUPAC Inorganic Chemistry science, those being Moscow and Tennessee, USA, respectively.
Committee then invites the discoverers to propose a name and The discoverers of element 118 were based in Moscow and the
a symbol. These must fall within strict guidelines. The name USA and, in proposing organesson, chose to honour scientist
22 1 Atomic structure
Yuri Organessian for his contribution to the chemistry and unstable and decay almost immediately by radioactive decay,
physics of the superheavy elements. producing new isotopes of known lighter elements. The four
Although the announcement of these new elements new elements were produced by firing 48Ca at californium or
was made by the IUPAC, the discovery of new so-called berkelium targets but the 48Ca does not carry enough protons
superheavy elements is largely the domain of physicists rather to produce new superheavies. The race has already started
than chemists. These massive and very unstable elements are to identify new targets in order to create elements 119 and
synthesized in extremely small amounts (in some cases, less even heavier superheavy elements. The periodic table seems
than 5 atoms) by nuclear fusion in a heavy ion accelerator. destined to expand even further as we proceed through the
This fuses together two nuclei containing many protons, twenty-first century. Indeed, elements beyond 118 may be
generating an immense repulsive force which immediately known, and named, by the time this text is due for its next
leads to nuclear fission in all but a tiny proportion of cases. revision, though the instability of any new element means
Even these few atoms of the new superheavy element are very practical applications are unlikely.
Main groups
VIII
18
I II III IV V VI VII
1 H
1 2 13 14 15 16 17
2 Representative elements
Transition metals
3
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Alkaline earth metals
4
Noble gases
Chalcogens
Alkali metals
Halogens
Lanthanoids
Ludwig Uhland
Der Abendfriede
Hans Benzmann
Abend
Gustav Falke
Am Abend
Heinrich Seidel
Abendlandschaft
Carl Busse
Abendlieder
I.
Hans Böhm
II.
Albert Sergel
III.
Gottfried Keller
Abendlied
Gottfried Kinkel
Wanderers Nachtlied
Richard Dehmel
Die tröstende Nacht
Bruno Wille
Nachtgefühl
Martin Greif