Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ebook Facilitation Techniques in Therapeutic Recreation 3Rd Edition John Dattilo Alexis Mckenney Online PDF All Chapter
Ebook Facilitation Techniques in Therapeutic Recreation 3Rd Edition John Dattilo Alexis Mckenney Online PDF All Chapter
Ebook Facilitation Techniques in Therapeutic Recreation 3Rd Edition John Dattilo Alexis Mckenney Online PDF All Chapter
https://ebookmeta.com/product/inclusive-leisure-services-3rd-
edition-john-dattilo/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/glitterland-3rd-edition-alexis-
hall/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/counseling-and-psychotherapy-
theories-in-context-and-practice-skills-strategies-
techniques-3e-3rd-edition-john-sommers-flanagan/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/moon-victoria-vancouver-island-
coastal-recreation-museums-gardens-whale-watching-3rd-edition-
andrew-hempstead/
Moon Denver Boulder Colorado Springs Getaways Outdoor
Recreation Bites Brews 3rd Edition Mindy Sink
https://ebookmeta.com/product/moon-denver-boulder-colorado-
springs-getaways-outdoor-recreation-bites-brews-3rd-edition-
mindy-sink/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/event-management-in-sport-
recreation-and-tourism-cheryl-mallen/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/women-in-business-1st-edition-
alexis-burling/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/moon-victoria-vancouver-island-
coastal-recreation-museums-gardens-whale-watching-travel-
guide-3rd-edition-andrew-hempstead/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/dimitri-hailstorm-mc-5-1st-edition-
alexis-ashlie-ashlie-alexis/
Dattilo
McKenney Facilitation Techniques
in Therapeutic Recreation
3 RD E D I T I O N
in Therapeutic Recreation
FACILITATION TECHNIQUES IN THERAPEUTIC RECREATION, THIRD EDITION
Facilitation Techniques
ISBN-13: 978-1-939476-09-8
ISBN-10: 1-939476-09-7
THIRD EDITION
FACILITATION TECHNIQUES
IN THERAPEUTIC RECREATION
THIRD EDITION
•••
ISBN-10: 1-939476-09-7
ISBN-13: 978-1-939476-09-8
ISBN ebook: 978-1-57167-823-2
DEDICATION
Preface......................................................................................................................................ix
Index.....................................................................................................................................705
PREFACE
Several years ago we were a part of a task force to identify competencies for entry level
therapeutic recreation (TR). The task force was composed of approximately a dozen
professionals with experience in TR. We reviewed documents produced by professional
organizations including the American Therapeutic Recreation (TR) Association, the
Council on TR Certification, the Pew Health Professions Commission, the National
Recreation and Parks Association and the National TR Society. After determining
competencies, we developed the first edition of this book with each chapter containing
specific sections to provide consistency to the reader. Although the chapters included in
this book cover various facilitation techniques used by TR specialists, the book clearly
is not exhaustive. The competencies generated by the task force became the basis for
identification of possible topics while individual expertise and interest guided selection
of techniques presented in the book.
The introductory chapter sets the stage for the book. The remaining chapters cluster
into four sections. The first section is devoted to interventions often used to promote
physical activity and fitness including chapters on adventure and aquatic therapy as
well as the therapeutic use of exercise, sports, and sailing. The second section contains
techniques frequently used to address challenges to emotional expression and control
such as anger management, expressive arts, moral discussions, therapeutic use of humor
and values development. Chapters on mindfulness and stress management as well as the
therapeutic use of reminiscence, magic, massage, and Tai Chi are strategies regularly
used to provide cognitive stimulation and promote well-being which is the third section
of the book. The final section contains educational and adaptation strategies including
assistive technology and leisure education as well as the therapeutic use of animals,
horseback riding, and play.
We hope that this book helps contribute to the education of TR specialists and
ultimately to improving the lives of people experiencing illness, disability, or other
characteristics that create challenges for them to experience leisure.
–J. D. & A. M.
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION:
THE AGE OF ENLIGHTENMENT FOR
THERAPEUTIC RECREATION
•••
John Dattilo
INTRODUCTION
As I look into a dictionary to find the word light, I read that light is that which makes it
possible to see. On first inspection this definition seems simple enough. I begin to think
about my experiences camping and how a flashlight is invaluable when attempting to play
an engaging game of gin rummy with my brother, Larry, after the sun has gone down. I
also remember when that same flashlight is pointed directly at my eyes, that light makes
it impossible for me to see. I conclude then that the value of light is dependent on how it
is used. Light is not inherently helpful; rather, it is the way it is applied that transforms
it into something useful. I am reminded of the story of the man looking for his keys.
A woman is walking down a street when she sees a man on his hands and
knees searching through his front lawn. The woman stops and asks the
man what he is doing. The man stops his search, looks up and while shield-
ing his eyes from the bright sun he explains to the woman that he has lost
his keys. The woman watches the man who continues to intently search
through the grass. She then asks the man where he last saw his keys. The
man stops and, once again, shields his eyes from the light as he further
explains to the woman that he last saw his keys in his kitchen. Puzzled, the
woman asks the man why he is looking for his keys in his front yard when
he last saw his keys in the kitchen. The man replies that the light is much
better out here.
So, light alone does not do us much good unless we know how to use it. Information
has many similarities to light in that information is not inherently useful but when
2 Facilitation Techniques in Therapeutic Recreation, Third Edition
Become
Returning to the dictionary, the word become is defined as to undergo change or
development. If we are to become enlightened we must be willing to change. Henry David
Thoreau’s words are relevant here, “Things do not change, we do.” If TR specialists want
to become enlightened, we must be willing to make changes in the manner in which we
deliver services. Returning to the analogy of “light,” I reflect on my belief that light can
help us find our way if, at times, we are willing to change. A story about my oldest son,
David, perhaps will illustrate this belief.
When David turned one year, he began attending a playgroup that met for
a few hours each week on campus. Each day when he and I departed in the
car we drove out of the driveway of our home and turned onto the road,
and we were headed directly into the sun. As the sun shone brightly into
his eyes he began to cry. We then approached an intersection and turned;
the sun no longer shown into his eyes and David was once more content.
However, each time we turned into the sun he cried until the next turn.
Needless to say, on those stretches when we were driving into the sun, my
foot was a bit heavier on the gas pedal. I tried several approaches to remedy
this situation, from giving David sunglasses to tinting the car windows,
but nothing we did seemed to make a difference. Then, one day, I pulled
out of the driveway and onto the street and . . . and . . . nothing! I was
facing forward in my typical cringed position and I did not hear any cry-
ing. Quickly I turned to see what had happened, and there was little David
smiling broadly while covering his eyes with his hands. Finally, David had
learned to change his behavior; by covering his eyes he solved the problem.
Enlightened
When people are enlightened, they experience freedom from ignorance and misin-
formation. As TR specialists are aware, freedom is a fundamental aspect of the leisure
experience. What appears most important in regards to freedom is the perception by
individuals that they are free. The French novelist, Antoine de Saint-Exupery once wrote
that: “I know but one freedom and that is the freedom of the mind.” Freedom of the
mind equates to freedom from ignorance.
Contained in his influential book The Rights of Man, the American political
philosopher Thomas Payne wrote that “Ignorance is of a peculiar nature; once dispelled,
Chapter 1: Introduction 3
it is impossible to reestablish it. It is not originally a thing of itself, but is only the absence
of knowledge.” I believe this quote helps to focus our attention on the power of knowledge
and the value of becoming enlightened. But a question may arise in your mind as “What
can we do to become enlightened?” I imagine that there are many ways to become
enlightened; however, I have chosen to briefly discuss the following four strategies:
• Listen
• Read
• Evaluate
• Research
Listen
I have realized over the years that by listening to people I can learn much. As a practitioner
I learned to listen to what people with disabilities said they wanted for their leisure.
When teaching others to work with people with disabilities I have tried to instill in them
the importance of listening. As I have taught students to become TR specialists and
watched them interact with participants, I provided them with advice given by William
Shakespeare: “Give every man thine ear, but few thy voice.”
The suggestion by Shakespeare can be a lesson for all of us. It seems to me that a
way to become enlightened is to listen to what other people are saying. Not focusing on
what we are going to say but rather taking time to listen to people allows us to be more
effective practitioners. We can listen to what participants are trying to tell us, what advice
our colleagues are trying to give us, and what guidance our supervisors are trying to share
with us. An experience I had after watching some of my eager and enthusiastic students
interact with some youth with developmental disabilities may help illustrate my point.
I have repeated that message several times over the years because listening is critical
to conveying to others that you care about them. Have you ever shared a conversation
with someone who, after the person finished telling a story and it was your turn to speak,
appeared to be thinking about what he or she was going to say next? If you happened
to take a breath this person would verbally jump in with yet another anecdote. If this
interaction continued for any length of time, how did this exchange make you feel? I
think it is helpful to remember that feeling as we interact with our participants when
they are trying to tell us something. An analogy comes to mind.
A young boy sits near a large boulder at the ocean’s edge. In his hand he
has a small squirt gun. After filling the gun he takes aim at the boulder and
fires. Much to his dismay, the water careens off the face of the boulder with-
out moving the large rock. It seems that the boulder is not really interested
in the boy or his feeble attempt at contact; the boulder stays rigid and ap-
parently unchanged. His interest in the boulder wanes and he glances away
4 Facilitation Techniques in Therapeutic Recreation, Third Edition
from the boulder and spies a rock lying on the ground. As he walks toward
the rock a wave comes in and moves the rock about. The boy marvels at
the way the rock responds to the ocean’s advances by tumbling in different
directions. It seems as if the rock is just waiting for the ocean to come to it
and touch it; the rock changes constantly based on the movements of the
ocean. To the boy the boulder was just not listening to him, but the rock
surely listened to the ocean.
When working with people with disabilities, do we hold fast to what we have
learned initially or do we listen, reflect on what others say, and then decide whether or
not to modify the way we deliver our services? It seems to me that simply closing our
mouths and opening our ears are actions that help us become enlightened.
Read
The value of reading is recognized in science as well as in popular culture. For example,
George R. R. Martin, author of the book and television series, A Game of Thrones,
focuses on the importance of reading for one key character, Tyrion Lannister. Tyrion,
who is played by Peter Dinklage, stated: My brother has his sword, King Robert has his
warhammer, and I have my mind . . . and a mind needs books as a sword needs a whetstone
if it is to keep its edge. That’s why I read so much Jon Snow.
Related to science, many studies have examined variables that could contribute to
school achievement. There appears to be one variable shown to consistently predict a
child’s success in school—reading. If adults read to children at a very young age and then
encourage and support children to read, these children are more successful in school.
The words of B. F. Skinner, the American psychologist, come to mind, We shouldn’t teach
great books; we should teach a love of reading.
Although we were required to read during our formal education, some of us
associate our learning with a structured classroom and a teacher telling us what is
important rather than reading assigned literature. Unfortunately, by the time some of us
are in college, much of our effort is devoted to figuring out the least amount of reading
we could get away with doing. To become enlightened it is imperative that we attempt
to keep abreast of new information by reading. After spending time in a library, Robert
Fulghum is his book Uh-Oh wrote the following.
the bad news. The good news was that the knowledge and the books that
contained it were infinite. I would never run out of things to learn. Knowl-
edge was infinite in every direction I turned.
Today, more than ever, research relevant to TR is being conducted and published
in journals. Textbooks are being written that attempt to synthesize and integrate
this research into practice. The importance of professionals staying abreast of recent
innovations became clearer to me through the following experience.
describe the technique and associated procedures. Therefore, in each chapter we provide
definitions of relevant terms that we found to be most useful and we use these terms
consistently throughout the chapter.
Evaluate
Although listening and reading are two important ways to become enlightened, TR
specialists must also continually evaluate what they do and make necessary adjustments
to enhance the services they deliver. Usually, it is easy to spot professionals who are
engaged in continuous evaluation of their actions; likewise, individuals who choose not
to appraise their actions are noticeable. Have you ever examined an agency’s recreation
activity bulletin board and learned that the activities posted have been offered the same
way for the past several years? Or have you watched a teacher lecture that is not that
interesting and continues to use notes that are old and outdated? Often, individuals
associated with these actions are in need of an evaluation of their services.
I am often impressed when I see TR specialists providing effective, innovative
services. Experience can be a wonderful teacher; however, I think it is useful to
consider that twenty years of experience can be one year of experience twenty times. Some
experienced professionals may have been engaged in fairly ineffective service delivery
for many years. Unless we continuously evaluate what we do, years of experience may
not be very useful. One way to avoid this is to continuously listen to those around us,
read relevant literature, and strive to evaluate what we do.
Research
The author of Research in Education, John Best, stated: Evaluation seeks conclusions
leading to recommendations and decisions; research seeks conclusions leading to new truths.
As previously mentioned, TR specialists who continuously evaluate their actions are able
to examine what they do, and based on this examination, make recommendations and
decisions regarding the way they deliver services. Although evaluation is an important
aspect of becoming enlightened, it is not sufficient.
The difficulty with relying only on clinical experience and evaluation to help make
decisions about practice is that, although participants may achieve therapeutic goals
and objectives after they engage in TR programs, it is not clear if these services actually
accounted for the improvement. Many other explanations for participant progress could
be provided, such as they matured, other therapies impacted their behavior, their health
improved, or they made advances in other areas of their lives. In addition, relying on
clinical experience alone does not allow us to become aware of the effects of many new
procedures and techniques that are being tested.
Rigorous research studies that hold other variables constant can provide additional
support when determining if a specific service achieves desired results. Again, I would
like to use a relevant quote from my colleague, Bruce Thyer, who wrote:
True professionals base what they do in practice on what has been done in research.
Cawley and colleagues noted that unfortunately there is a gap between research and
practice and this is troubling since many practitioners do not use the knowledge produced
by research. In her suggestion to mental health professionals, Leslie Tutty explained that
to provide the most effective treatment available, professionals must keep . . . current on
the research on treatment effectiveness for their particular client populations. Also, after
conducting a critical review of empirical research, Betsy Botts and her colleagues made
the following conclusions:
Enlighten
Turning again to the dictionary I find enlighten defined as “to furnish knowledge to
instruct.” An important aspect of the role of TR specialists is to teach participants
ways they might experience leisure and improve their physical, cognitive, emotional,
and social skills. If leisure is such a desired condition and our services are designed to
achieve therapeutic outcomes, why then are some people not motivated to learn, play, or
participate in recreation activities? After talking with many participants and practitioners
over the years and considering my experiences, I have come to the conclusion that this
is an important question to try to answer when providing TR services.
One explanation for why some people are not motivated may be found when
examining how learning is viewed by individuals and our society. I have learned a great
deal by watching young children play. Most all children are born curious and spend
a great deal of their waking hours engaged in exploration. They explore so that they
learn about the world and themselves. This is why when children’s disabilities inhibit
their exploration, it is important that early intervention programs be provided for these
children to create an environment which is conducive to their exploration.
Children who are curious, who engage in inquiry, and who are intrinsically
motivated to explore the world around them are said to be autonomous. In his book,
Why We Do What We Do, Edward Deci stated that:
Children are naturally motivated to explore, play, and learn new things. That is
to say, children engage in learning activities for the pure enjoyment of learning, not for
some external reward. As a result, once children learn a few words, they use these words
to learn more. For example:
One day I was wrestling with my boys, David and Steven, when Steven was
just learning to talk. My primary goal was to keep David, who weighed
twice as much as Steven, from landing on Steven. As a result, I positioned
myself on all fours over Steven and kept David somewhere on my back. In
the midst of the excitement I looked down at Steven and I leaned forward
and kissed his check. He looked up at me with his eyes open wide and
said “Daddy, why kiss?” Searching for an appropriate response I told him
because I loved him. He then asked “Daddy, why love?” Again, I struggled
for a response and explained that I loved him because he was my son. He
then responded by saying “Daddy, why son?” Although this question was
not as easy, I was determined to respond with a comment that would satisfy
him. In fact, in an attempt to not curb his curiosity and his intrinsically
motivated verbal explorations, I often challenge myself to continue to an-
swer each of Steven’s inquiries until he is satisfied and turns his attention
to other matters.
10 Facilitation Techniques in Therapeutic Recreation, Third Edition
When people are rewarded for listening to music, playing games, or volun-
teering, their behavior can become overjustified; that is, they may begin to
attribute their participation to extrinsic motives. Research has suggested
that such overjustification can be dangerous. The introduction of extrinsic
rewards tends to undermine people’s experience of self-determination . . .
To enlighten people who receive our services we might consider the issue of
motivation as it relates to leisure participation. Perhaps, rather than asking the ques-
tion: How can we motivate participants? we might want to ask: How can we develop an
environment in which they will motivate themselves? Providing flexible and responsive
environments that encourage exploration and autonomy, rather than ones that are rigid
and controlling and tend to undermine intrinsic motivation associated with learning
and recreation participation may be one way we can enlighten our participants.
Resistance to Enlightenment
Up to this point I have described how TR specialists might become enlightened so that we
can enlighten participants. If you agree that it is important for TR specialists to become
enlightened, then you may have a nagging question similar to mine. A question directly
linked to the development of this book and a question that I would like to address before
concluding this chapter is: Why do some TR specialists resist becoming enlightened?
In an attempt to address why we might be resistant to becoming enlightened, I
would like to present what I call the Yin-Yang of an Emerging Professional. If we are
associated with an emerging profession, we are considered to be emerging professionals.
We must participate in a balancing act to gain the confidence of participants and become
enlightened.
One the one hand, we are thrust into a position as TR specialists where we
experience the pressure to be competent professionals providing effective services. We
are expected to know what is best for participants and it is assumed that our knowledge
and skill development occurred primarily prior to our practice. This aspect of being
Chapter 1: Introduction 11
A bookstore is a “smarter than you” store. And that’s why people are
intimidated—because to walk into a bookstore, you have to admit there’s
something you don’t know. And the worst part is, you don’t even know
where it is. You go in the bookstore and you have to ask people, “Where is
this? Where is that? Not only do I lack knowledge, I don’t even know where
to get it.” So just to walk into a bookstore you’re admitting to the world,
“I’m not too bright.” It’s pretty impressive, really.
of concern since others may doubt our legitimacy; thus, we must continuously educate
others about the value of our services. Conversely, being associated with an emerging
profession can be a source of excitement since we are in a position to have a significant
impact on a profession that is in its early stages of development.
CONCLUSION
Now is the time that we can become enlightened so that we can enlighten people with
disabilities. Collectively, we can make this be the age of enlightenment for TR. To become
enlightened we can listen to others, read professional journals and texts, evaluate our
actions, and consume research. As we become enlightened, we are better able to enlighten
others. Creating an environment that encourages participants to be motivated to learn
and experience leisure is one way we can enlighten participants. Finding a balance
between the demands of competence and the need for research in our professional lives
may help us avoid resisting enlightenment.
CHAPTER 2
ADVENTURE THERAPY
•••
Diane Groff
INTRODUCTION
Adventure therapy is an action-centered approach to treatment that is used within the
field of therapeutic recreation (TR). As opposed to other, more traditional forms of
therapy, adventure therapy encourages individuals to become mentally and physically
engaged in adventure activities. The unfamiliar nature of these activities, combined with
the sense of community developed during participation in activities, creates a climate
in which individuals can challenge their current perceptions and behaviors, and affords
them an opportunity to modify those behaviors.
This chapter is designed to introduce the reader to adventure therapy. To achieve
this purpose, a definition and description of adventure therapy is offered. After a brief
account of its history, the theoretical foundations of adventure therapy are provided as
a means to explore the underlying concepts of adventure therapy. A review of related
literature reveals the effectiveness of adventure therapy, while a case study is presented
as an example of the potential impact of adventure therapy. Finally, in an attempt to
enhance the reader’s understanding of adventure therapy, a list of professional resources
and intervention implementation exercises are provided.
DEFINITIONS
Adventure therapy lacks a clear, consistent definition partly because it is typically
subsumed under the larger category of adventure programming, which also suffers
from the lack of a clear definition (Itin, 2001). To clarify this situation, the following
phrases will be defined:
• Adventure Programming
• Adventure Activities
• Adventure Therapy
14 Facilitation Techniques in Therapeutic Recreation, Third Edition
Adventure Programming
In various settings, adventure programming may be referred to as experiential education,
outdoor recreation, adventure recreation, wilderness therapy, and adventure therapy. For
the purposes of this chapter, adventure programming will refer to adventure activities
designed to promote interpersonal and intrapersonal change within individuals and
groups (Priest, 1990).
Adventure Activities
Adventure activities have uncertain outcomes. Adventure activities typically include
activities such as camping, games, initiatives that involve group problem-solving
activities, backpacking, rock climbing, canoeing, and ropes courses. Recently, new forms
of adventure activities have emerged to include activities such as base jumping, sand
surfing, mountain biking, zip-line tree-canopy tours, jeep rides, and ultra-marathons.
Adventure Therapy
Adventure therapy refers to the subset of adventure programs that focus on the use of
adventure activities to accomplish treatment-related goals (Newes & Bandoroff, 2004).
This form of therapy may occur in either wilderness settings or facility-based settings
(Gass, Gillis & Russell, 2012). Adventure therapy conducted in wilderness settings
generally refers to small-group, multiple-day interventions conducted in remote areas
away from modern conveniences such as electricity, buildings, appliances, and stores.
Wilderness settings create effective contexts for therapy because they place individuals
in unfamiliar environment that offers opportunities for reflection and the development
of supportive relationships (Russell, 2001a). Wilderness settings can be particularly
powerful in promoting healing and personal growth because they foster the develop-
ment of physical and emotional survival skills needed to cope in this new environment
(Werhen & Groff, 2005). Conversely, facility-based adventure therapy occurs at or close
to a facility that provides therapeutic interventions and uses the out-of-doors near or
around the facility.
According to Gass and colleagues (2012), adventure therapy varies according to: (a)
the specific needs of the participant; (b) the complexity of the participant’s therapeutic
issue(s); (c) the background training and therapeutic expertise of the adventure therapist;
(d) the length of time the adventure therapist has to work with the participant; (e) the
context the participant came from and will return to after the adventure experience; (f)
the presence of aftercare or follow-up treatment following the adventure experience;
(g) the availability of adventure experience(s); and (h) the therapist’s ability/limitations
in using adventure experiences in his or her treatment approaches. Regardless of the
setting or degree of the intervention, adventure therapy is defined as:
Given that there are many components to this definition, it may be helpful to
provide an explanation of the various portions of the definition. These components are:
Chapter 2: Adventure Therapy 15
• Active approach
• People seeking change
• Activities involving risk
• Adventure as the primary medium
Active approach
The phrase “an active approach to psychotherapy” describes the psychological treatment
of mental, emotional, physical, or nervous disorders. In addition, it implies some sense of
action or movement, as opposed to more passive and traditional verbally based therapy.
and helping skills needed to effectively process the experience (Werhen & Groff, 2005).
Components of a risk-management plan may include information about the proper
use of equipment, technical training required of leaders, an emergency plan of action,
and rescue procedures.
In addition to the real risks encountered during adventure therapy, participants
are likely to experience feelings of perceived risk. Perceived risk represents the feelings
of uncertainty or apprehension that often occurs as participants climb a rock face, hike
a trail, or walk across a wire suspended 50 feet above the ground. Real and perceived
risks are critical to the success of adventure therapy and will be discussed in more detail
when a description of adventure therapy is presented.
Summary
Adventure therapy is an active approach to therapy. The unfamiliar nature of adventure
activities creates an environment that challenges participants to change or modify
dysfunctional perceptions and behaviors. Although the setting, duration, and adventure
activities utilized within programs may vary, the nature of these experiences provides
TR specialists with a useful technique to facilitate change.
DESCRIPTIONS
Although providing a definition helps to clarify what adventure therapy is, it does
little to explain how adventure therapy produces change. In an effort to delineate the
components of adventure therapy that help facilitate the growth of individuals, a more
detailed description of adventure experiences and adventure therapy are provided. The
following items will be explored:
The conditions of exploration and experimentation result when risks are low and
competence is high. When an individual’s competence is only slightly greater than the risk
involved in an activity, the condition of adventure occurs. If the risk is relatively equally
matched with one’s competence, a peak adventure is believed to happen. When the risk
rises slightly above one’s competence a misadventure is said to occur. Finally, when an
individual’s competence is low and the risks are high, devastation and disaster may result.
The adventure experience paradigm is based on the premise that the interplay
between an individual’s perception of risk and competence creates varying degrees of
challenge. Facilitated adventure experiences, such as those found in adventure therapy,
occur when an individual’s perceived competence in an area matches the risk encountered
in an activity. The trained professional is therefore responsible for creating a learning
environment that facilitates the match of challenge and skill.
Each category within the adventure experience paradigm has the potential to create
a learning situation. Priest (1990) acknowledged that due to the need to manage risks
associated with adventure experiences, the most appropriate opportunities for learning
occur in the categories of exploration and experimentation, adventure, peak adventure,
and misadventure.
The intent of facilitated adventure experiences, such as adventure therapy, is to
assist participants to gradually shift their perceptions of competence toward becoming
“in tune with reality” (Priest, 1990, p. 160). The next portion of this section will provide
the reader with a more in-depth understanding of the components of adventure therapy
that facilitate individual growth and development.
• The participant
• Disequilibrium
• Novel setting
• Cooperative environment
• Unique problem-solving situations
• Feelings of accomplishment
• Processing the experience
• Generalization and transfer
Participants
Consistent with a participant-centered approach to TR, the individual represents the
centerpiece of adventure therapy. Participants’ anticipation of the experience causes a
sense of internal stimulation and sets the stage for learning.
Disequilibrium
Participants’ feelings of stimulation create a state of disequilibrium. Disequilibrium
occurs when individuals’ previously held beliefs regarding a situation do not apply to
the current situation. This internal conflict motivates individuals to either change or
modify their beliefs and perceptions in an effort to reduce the discomfort disequilibrium
produces.
Novel setting
The reason most individuals experience disequilibrium during adventure therapy is
due to the novel setting in which they are placed. Settings in which adventure therapy
occurs are typically novel because they are conducted in an unfamiliar area such as
wilderness areas, a ropes course (see Figure 2.1), and trails, and/or involve unfamiliar
activities, such as rock climbing, camping, and initiatives. The diversity of people who
form a group can also create an unfamiliar social environment.
Cooperative environment
Adventure therapy is conducted in a cooperative environment that emphasizes
interdependence among group members. A cooperative environment is generated
primarily by establishing group and individual goals. Group cohesion is developed over
time as individuals interact and communicate with one another within this cooperative
environment.
Feelings of accomplishment
Increasingly more difficult challenges create opportunities to continually develop and
refine various skills. This mastery-learning situation encourages the group to work
together, and leads to feelings of accomplishment. Successfully completing an unfamiliar
task can lead to increased self-esteem, improved self-perception, more effective problem
solving, and pride.
Figure 2.1
20 Facilitation Techniques in Therapeutic Recreation, Third Edition
in the successful generalization and transference of learning are the metaphors used
during adventure activities.
Metaphoric Learning
Adventure therapy relies heavily on the use of metaphors to help enhance the learning
opportunities available during adventure activities (Hirsch & Gillis, 2004). Gillis (1995)
defined a metaphoric story as “a symbolic way of experiencing reality, where one thing
(an adventure experience) is conceived as representing another situation in a client’s or
group’s actual lives (reality)” (p. 8). Typically, metaphors are presented at the beginning of
activities and are used to provide a framework for the activity. This framework provides a
group structure where individuals derive meaning that extend beyond the activity itself.
Metaphoric learning occurs as the group, or individuals, discover that strategies
required to complete adventure activities are similar to the strategies they could employ
when faced with similar challenges. Kimball and Bacon (1993) identified three types of
transference-enhancing strategies that could be incorporated into adventure therapy:
Analogous transference
Analogous transference that involves verbal and social learning (modeling) techniques
employed to help participants retrospectively understand the importance of the experi-
ence. Analogous transference occurs frequently in adventure therapy.
For example, Estel may have completed the same difficult climb above and,
although elated at her success, thought nothing more about it. While de-
briefing the activity, the facilitator may ask her to recall a situation in which
she felt similar feelings of helplessness to the ones experienced during the
climb. At that time she may recall her experience with not trying out for the
band due to her feelings of inadequacy. The facilitator may then ask Estel
to envision trying out for the band again, only this time picture using the
information she learned about herself during the climb. After considerable
Chapter 2: Adventure Therapy 21
thought, she might proclaim, This time I can see myself trying out for the
band and not feeling so scared. I guess that just like during the climb, I’ll
never know how good it feels to reach the top of anything if I don’t at least
give it a try.
Figure 2.2
22 Facilitation Techniques in Therapeutic Recreation, Third Edition
We all face challenges in our everyday lives that can appear to be insur-
mountable. In fact, we may wake up each day not knowing how to face the
challenges we think the day will bring. We may look at a challenge and see
no way around it. When we face a challenge there are several ways we can
respond. We could simply walk away from the challenge and pretend it
doesn’t exist or pretend that the challenge isn’t really important. This solu-
tion may leave us feeling bad about ourselves and we may use alcohol or
drugs to numb our pain. However, we may look at the challenge and figure
out a way to get over the obstacle. Often we rely on the help of friends
and relatives to find the resources we need to overcome a challenge. The
objective of this activity is to find a way to get your entire group up and
over the wall, without the use of any outside props. It’s up to the group to
determine how you will face this obstacle. Will you turn away from the
challenge before attempting it, or will you pool your resources and find a
way to overcome this challenge?
There are several factors associated with metaphoric learning that are useful to
consider. Three factors include:
• Isomorphism
• Narratives
• Reflective teams
Isomorphism
A key factor in determining whether experiences are metaphoric is the degree of
isomorphism between the metaphor situation and the real-life situation (Bacon, 1983).
Isomorphism refers to the overlapping structure between the two situations. In the
example above, the metaphor may work well with individuals who experience chemical
dependencies, but may not work particularly well with individuals who do not have
problems facing challenging situations.
Narratives
Luckner and Nadler (1995) described metaphoric transference as a way to increase
participants’ understanding of how an adventure-based event relates to their lives.
The authors reported that individuals are continuously in an active state of learning
by interpreting information in an effort to make sense of their lives. To learn new
information, people must be actively involved in a process of invention, rather than in
a passive accumulation of ideas.
Luckner and Nadler explained that a narrative or story is a sequential telling of
events related to a specific theme. The narrative is also a foundation metaphor that helps
people organize, remember, and understand life experiences. The narrative helps the
participant organize and recall the information for transference to other life experiences.
Outdoor adventure experiences help participants become aware of and produce accounts
of the experiences that give meaning to their lives. Subsequently, reflection upon the
major themes that compose one’s life story helps an individual interpret and negotiate
other life experiences.
Chapter 2: Adventure Therapy 23
Reflective teams
In addition to individual processing, Luckner and Nadler discussed the use of reflective
teams to help expand or develop a story. A reflective team includes designated individuals
that watch a participant in an activity. The participant and the team create stories
about the activity experience, which results in the entire group expanding the story. To
encourage long-term benefits of adventure therapy, it is important for a participant to
discover that strategies used to complete adventure activities successfully are similar
to the strategies that they could employ when faced with similar challenges in various
aspects of real life.
Summary
The degree of perceived risk and competence participants bring to adventure activities has
the potential to create a myriad of opportunities for learning. Practitioners responsible for
facilitating adventure experiences attempt to accurately match an individual’s perceived
competence with the perceived risk activities in an attempt to maximize this learning
potential. Once a cooperative and nurturing learning environment is created, the unique
problem-solving situations presented during adventure therapy afford participants
opportunities for mastery, which often lead to enhanced feelings of accomplishment and
self-esteem. The act of processing these experiences helps participants realize that the
lessons they have learned from adventure therapy generalize and transfer to everyday life.
HISTORY
The processes that have contributed to the success of adventure therapy have evolved
over time. In an attempt to more fully understand adventure therapy it may be helpful to
briefly review its history. Berman and Davis-Berman (1995) traced the roots of adventure
therapy to three distinct movements:
• Tent Therapy
• Therapeutic Camping
• Outward Bound
Tent Therapy
As early as 1901 the first tent therapy program was developed for people receiving
psychiatric services at state hospitals. The program involved having participants live in
tents for the summer. Although not empirically tested, staff and participants reported
positive effects of the program. Unfortunately, these reported benefits diminished as
participants returned to the hospital when cold weather arrived.
The second outdoor approach to therapy began 10 years later when Camp Ahmek
was established to provide children with opportunities for recreation and socialization
(Berman & Davis-Berman, 1995). This camping experience used the group process in
a natural environment to facilitate change. The third, and perhaps the largest influence
on adventure therapy, occurred during WWII.
Therapeutic Camping
Kurt Hahn initiated the idea of using adventure programming to improve the survival rate
of sailors whose ships were being torpedoed and sunk by German U-boats. Most of the
sailors were not dying from the explosions, but rather from being thrown overboard and
24 Facilitation Techniques in Therapeutic Recreation, Third Edition
drowning. What concerned the Navy and Kurt Hahn was that regardless of their superior
physical condition, the younger sailors were more likely to drown than the older sailors.
Hahn and others theorized that the large number of young sailors, who were
dying, were doing so because they lacked the experience to cope with stressful
situations (Greene & Thompson, 1990). As a result, Hahn developed a program that
used therapeutic camping as a means to teach sailors how to prepare and deal with the
hardships they could face. The program emphasized the development of leadership
abilities, self-concept, confidence, and risk-taking abilities by enhancing an individual’s
skills related to communication, cooperation, trust, and teamwork. The training that
began in 1941 resulted in the development of Outward Bound.
Outward Bound
The ideas and philosophy of Outward Bound grew in popularity during the 1960s
when adventure-based programs were developed for adjudicated youth. By the 1970s,
the number of programs utilizing adventure therapy was in the thousands. By the
1980s, the number of schools, colleges, youth services, recreation departments, social
services, correctional facilities, hospitals, and vocational programs that adopted the use
of adventure therapy prompted a surge in popularity (Kimball & Bacon, 1993).
Today, Outward Bound is an international organization that has provided over 50
years of leadership in experiential education. The Outward Bound Wilderness program
offers an array of wilderness courses throughout the United States. Courses are offered
to college-age students to help develop life skills. Intercept courses are designed to
help teens and young adults enhance individual responsibility, confidence, teamwork,
confidence, and self-awareness. Veterans returning from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan
can participate in 5–7 day wilderness courses to help reintegrate into civilian life. Lastly, a
series of special programs is designed to help a variety of special populations such as the
Heroic Journey program for grieving teens and young adults, and Group Programs for
cancer survivors, families of 9/11, high school and college groups, and corporate groups.
Summary
Although adventure therapy has existed for over 100 years, it was during the 1960s that
the use of adventure therapy grew in popularity. The popularity of this intervention has
permitted the identification of components of adventure therapy that contribute to its
success; however, the theoretical foundations governing the use of adventure therapy
are still being investigated. What follows is an exploration of the theoretical foundations
of adventure therapy.
THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS
Gillis (1995) stated that “no one theory from the field of psychotherapy appears to be
adequate to explain the cognitive, affective, and behavioral changes that can take place
in adventure experiences” (p. 7). Instead, a variety of social-psychological theories
help account for the effects of adventure-based therapy. The following theories will be
reviewed:
• Self-Perception
• Self-Efficacy
• Explanatory Style
• Social Identity
Chapter 2: Adventure Therapy 25
Self-Perception
Self-concept is a widely researched topic within the field of adventure therapy (Klint,
1990). The term “self-concept” generally refers to an individual’s beliefs about his or
her personal qualities (Smith, Mackie, & Claypool, 2014). The self-perception theory
developed by Darryl Bem (1967) suggests that we obtain much of the information that
we use when developing perceptions of ourselves when we observe our behaviors.
For example, if Anton stops to help someone who has fallen during a road race, he
may believe that he is a nice person. In another example, if Marika is doing well when
learning to water ski for the first time, she may begin to realize that she is coordinated
and athletic. The more accessible information is to an individual, the more likely it will
be used when developing self-concept (Bem, 1967).
Self-perception theory enhances our understanding of adventure therapy for
several reasons. This theory helps explain why the action-oriented nature of adventure
therapy is effective. Easley (1991) described the experiential nature of adventure therapy
as an awareness or consciousness that survives after the education and restructuring
and rethinking about the event occurs. Adventure therapy offers individuals ample
opportunities to observe their own behavior because it is a very active “lived” experience.
These lived experiences result in concrete, immediate, and observable information that
typically has definitive consequences.
For example, lack of group cooperation during an activity is very likely to stop
the group from accomplishing its goal. The therapist and participants can subsequently
use this information to examine behavioral patterns and beliefs and help participants
change their self-concept.
Through adventure experiences, participants receive clear representations of what
actions and behaviors are likely to result in what consequences. This may help individuals
recognize inappropriate behaviors and provide them with mental representations of how
to correct and modify that behavior in the future.
Kimball and Bacon (1993) reported that action-centered therapies, such as
adventure therapy, can be particularly effective with adolescents. Most adolescents find
that they prefer quick, direct, and concrete forms of communication as opposed to a more
reflective, introspective communication. Adolescent culture generally de-emphasizes
and places little value on cognitive, language-oriented styles of communication.
Adventure therapy attempts to “meet youth on their own turf ” by de-emphasizing
the need for language skills and replacing them with “lived experiences.” Therefore,
adventure therapy may be a particularly productive environment for adolescents to reflect
upon and reconsider their self-perceptions since the action orientation of the activity
provides individuals with additional information they can use to define themselves.
Self-Efficacy
Self-efficacy refers to an individual’s beliefs that he or she is capable of successfully
accomplishing tasks that test his or her abilities (Smith, Mackie, & Claypool, 2014). In
general, most people want to view themselves in a positive light, and feel as if they have
skills and abilities that are valued. Feelings of self-efficacy originate from the internal
and external information individuals receive about their abilities and ultimately play a
role in their motivation to engage in certain behaviors.
Bandura’s (1977) self-efficacy theory suggests that information gained through
actual experience regarding one’s skills and abilities tends to be the most influential in
26 Facilitation Techniques in Therapeutic Recreation, Third Edition
For example, it would be difficult for Olivia to deny that she can be respon-
sible for others after she successfully helped a peer on a rock climb and was
accountable for the safety of that person during the climb.
Explanatory Style:
Learned Helplessness—Learned Optimism
Explanatory style captures the way individuals explain why events occur (Seligman,
2006). When used within adventure therapy, explanatory styles can help individuals
negotiate negative experiences and construct new narratives that are positive and aid in
recovery (Martin, Groff, & Battaglini, 2014). One explanatory style is learned helplessness,
or the belief that whatever one does will not matter (Seligman, 1975). Learned optimism
on the other hand, describes individuals who believe that setbacks are temporary
occasions that are the result of circumstances, bad luck, or outside influences (Seligman,
2006). Individuals who possess a high degree of optimism will try harder to persevere
through negative life events and are less depressed by these experiences (Seligman, 2006).
Repeated personal experiences in which people feel as if they have no control over
the situation may result in feelings of helplessness (Seligman, 1975). Learned helplessness
occurs when a person generalizes his or her feelings of helplessness in one situation to
other aspects of that person’s life. Learned helplessness eventually decreases motivation to
engage in new activities, as well as undermines attempts made to master situations (Smith,
Mackie, & Claypool, 2014). Smith and colleagues (2014) reported that if an individual
generalizes feelings of helplessness to most areas of life, these feelings may contribute
to clinical depression which can be characterized by negative moods, low self-esteem,
pessimism, as well as a disruption of thinking, sleeping, eating, and activity patterns.
Given that most adventure programs operate under the philosophy of “challenge
by choice,” adventure therapy may help to reduce a person’s feelings of lack of control
Chapter 2: Adventure Therapy 27
and learned helplessness (Gass, Gillis, & Russell, 2012). Challenge by choice allows
individuals to decide for themselves if, and to what degree, they would like to participate
in activities. If people repeatedly refuse to participate in activities, they are encouraged
to reflect upon why they did not want to participate and what consequences would
likely occur given their decision. By conducting programs within a challenge by choice
philosophy, adventure therapy may help individuals regain a sense of control, which
was lost while they experienced learned helplessness.
It is important that individuals who are experiencing negative life events develop
and maintain an optimistic outlook so that they can make sense of their situation and
develop the skills needed to overcome difficult situations (Seligman, 2002, 2006). The
difficulties experienced during adventure activities can help individuals develop the
“psychological resiliency” needed to adopt an optimistic explanatory style (Neill &
Dias, 2001). Due to the difficult challenges and failures experienced during adventure
activities, individuals have an opportunity to learn how to fail.
The supportive environment of the group allows individuals to recover from the
experience of failing and improve their capacity to face future hardships (Gass, Gillis &
Russell, 2012). Thus, challenge and social support work together to create opportunities
to work through personal hardship, recover from experiences, and experience personal
growth. If individuals feel that they have control over situations and can overcome
negative life experiences they may reconstruct a more positive personal narrative, adopt a
more optimistic explanatory style, more easily confront difficult situations in the future,
and become happier individuals.
Social Identity
One of the most fundamental needs of individuals is to feel a sense of belonging (Smith,
Mackie, & Claypool, 2014). Feeling a sense of unconditional regard and social support
is thus critical for personal growth and development (Russell, & Phillips-Miller, 2002).
Being identified as part of a group also helps people to establish a sense of connectedness
with others, and provides them with information that they can use to define themselves.
Ultimately, group memberships can influence “what we think, how we feel, and what
we do,” and therefore provide a “social identity.”
Adventure therapy is primarily a group treatment that necessitates small-group
interactions. The relationships afforded during adventure activities are thus foundational
to how adventure therapy works (Gass, Gillis, & Russell, 2012). In adventure therapy, a
variety of relationships are both “built and explored,” including relationships between
the individual and therapist, staff, peer group, family, and community. In the ABC ~R
model, a participant will begin the process of exploring steps toward change depending
upon what they bring to the program. The starting point for therapy may stem from
the participant’s emotional response (A), behavior (B), or irrational or problematic
thoughts (C) (Gass, Gillis & Russell). The relationship or alliance that the participant
builds with the therapist and peers is the primary tool that uncovers the dysfunctional
patterns and can lead to therapeutic change. Since one’s personality and sense of identity
is largely influenced by involvement and interaction with other people, structured group
experiences help to reshape that person’s perceptions of the self.
In most adventure experiences, conflict will arise within the group due to participa-
tion in planned stressful situations. Since the impending consequences of an individual’s
actions are likely to have an effect on all members of the group, an individual’s response
28 Facilitation Techniques in Therapeutic Recreation, Third Edition
to this situation is likely to be monitored and evaluated by all members of the group.
When situations such as this arise, guided group discussions, or debriefings, help resolve
the problem. Within a safe group environment, observations of individual or group
performance can be utilized to evaluate and encourage the modification of dysfunctional
behaviors. Project Adventure has operationalized this therapeutic approach through the
use of a full value contract (FVC) (Schoel, Prouty, & Radcliffe, 1988). The FVC challenges
a group to develop safe and respectful behavioral norms, have everyone agree to adhere
to those norms, and to accept shared responsibility for maintaining the norms. When
individuals break the contract, the entire group is responsible for applying consequences
for breaking the contract. The FVC empowers a group to develop a shared sense of
identity including concrete values that they will use to guide their actions.
The genuine community built during adventure activities can help to create a
sense of mutual dependence and trust between members. Since adventure activities
require a commitment from each of its members to accomplish a task, individuals have
an opportunity to experience how it feels to know their actions influence others, and
realize their actions can be significant.
Summary
Although each adventure experience carries the potential for participants to learn,
experiences that closely match an individual’s perceived competence with the degree
of perceived risk are more likely to result in an environment conducive to learning
(Csikszentmihalyi, 1993). Based on self-perception theory (Bem, 1967), once a conducive
environment to learning is created, the experiential nature of adventure therapy can
help people enhance their feelings of self-efficacy (Bandura, 1977) and reduce their
feelings of helplessness (Seligman, 1975). In addition, the opportunity for structured
group experiences that adventure therapy provides (Kimball & Bacon, 1993) can help
individuals improve self-perception and develop an optimistic explanatory style that leads
to increased happiness. However, being a relatively new field, research demonstrating the
ability of adventure therapy to generate consistent outcomes is ongoing. The following
section will elaborate on research related to adventure therapy.
EFFECTIVENESS
Although there are numerous studies that demonstrate the efficacy of adventure therapy,
conclusive findings are lacking due to a shortage of well-designed, meaningful, and
applicable studies (Gass, Gillis, & Russell, 2012). In the early 1980s Ewert conducted
a comprehensive review of over 50 studies on self-concept and other psychological
outcomes related to what he called “wilderness and adventure education.” Ewert (1982)
concluded that, although Outward Bound programs can positively enhance an indi-
vidual’s self-concept, self-esteem, physical ability, and social interaction, little is known
about the type of programs that created change such as length of program, activity mix,
and instructional staff.
Subjective impressions of program outcomes and individual research studies sup-
port the efficacy of adventure therapy, but failure to conduct well-organized, definitive,
and controlled research on adventure therapy limits our understanding of its effectiveness
(Neill, 2003). Rather than review the numerous individual research studies focused on
adventure therapy, this review will focus on key meta-analyses and longitudinal studies
that have been conducted since 1994.
Chapter 2: Adventure Therapy 29
One of the most effective ways to statistically synthesize the results of many
individual studies and summarize the magnitude of change that occurs across and within
programs is to conduct a meta-analysis. Meta-analyses allow a researcher to examine
the common effect of a treatment from studies that may or may not have used similar
instruments and methodology. There have been several key meta-analyses of adventure
therapy outcomes and pertinent longitudinal studies and reviews.
Most recently, Bowen and Neil (2013) reviewed 197 studies specifically focused
on adventure therapy. The studies represented 17,728 participants who were largely
male (62%) teenagers (ages 9–65, M=17). The researchers found moderate, positive and
statistically significant outcomes in the following seven categories: academic, behavior,
clinical, family development, physical, self-concept, and social development. The adven-
ture programs did not significantly impact measures of morality/spirituality. These broad
outcome categories were determined through consideration of 2,908 various adventure
therapy program characteristics measured prior to and after treatment. Furthermore,
the program outcomes found in the adventure therapy group were much larger than
studies during which alternative and control groups that did not receive any intervention
were examined. The longer-term follow-up effects for these outcome categories were
very small and positive but not statistically significant. The results represent the most
robust meta-analysis conducted to date and indicate that adventure therapy is positively
and moderately effective at accomplishing desirable clinical outcomes. However, the
long-term effects of this treatment modality must still be explored.
Russell (2001b, 2002) completed a longitudinal assessment of outcomes associated
with outdoor behavioral healthcare (OBH). Based on the responses of youth and parents
he reported that clients enrolled in an OBH program improved their well-being, as
evidenced by reduced scores on the Youth Outcome Questionnaire (Y-OQ). Parental
assessment mirrored these positive outcomes. The longitudinal analysis of outcomes
determined that the positive behaviors were maintained at months 3 and 6; however,
parents reported a slight deterioration in their child’s behaviors indicating that they
believed outcomes were not fully maintained over time. A random sample of the data
set revealed that clients did, however, maintain outcomes from treatment and had
continued to improve emotionally and behaviorally 1 year post participation in the
OBH program. The authors concluded that OBH treatment can effectively address the
behavioral problems of youth; however, these outcomes may be challenged over time.
Practitioners were encouraged to continue to find ways to maintain improvements
experienced during treatment.
Russell and Hendee (2000) completed a national survey of outdoor behavioral
healthcare (OBH) programs. OBH programs encompass clinically supervised adventure
and wilderness based outdoor therapy designed to help adolescents change destructive,
dysfunctional, or problematic behaviors. One key accomplishment of the OBHIC was
to establish standards that met insurance and state agency requirements for reimburse-
ment of services. Standards required for co-payments and reimbursement include
the development of individual treatment plans, supervision of clinical staff, regular
medical check-ups of clients, appropriate backup procedures governing wilderness
operations, and regulated daily caloric intake of participants. The authors concluded
from a comprehensive review of the literature that wilderness programs governed under
these guidelines provided consistent evidence that OBH helps clients gain a heightened
30 Facilitation Techniques in Therapeutic Recreation, Third Edition
self-concept that was related to several clinical outcomes such as self-esteem, locus of
control and social skills.
The authors suggested that social skills were an important area of study since
deficiencies in this realm can promote delinquent behavior because individuals lack
the skills needed to develop close interpersonal relationships; thus, leading to isolation,
apathy, defensiveness, aggressiveness, and lack of respect for others. Outdoor behavioral
healthcare can positively affect social skills by teaching individuals how to function in
an interdependent community, to develop interpersonal communication skills, and to
develop cooperative behaviors. Lastly, the authors suggest that OBH can positively influ-
ence substance abuse and recidivism, although additional research must be conducted
before definitive outcomes can be assured.
Because self-concept is the most frequently studied construct in adventure
therapy research, Hans (2000), attempted to replicate the effect sizes found in previous
meta-analyses. The meta-analysis of 24 studies included 1,632 subjects and yielded 30
effect sizes. Hans demonstrated a slightly higher effect on self-concept compared to
the two previous meta-analyses. This indicates that subjects across all studies shifted
toward more internal self-regulation because of participation in adventure programs.
Hans reported that two moderator variables (program goal and daily duration) affected
these effects. Larger effect sizes were observed in therapeutically oriented programs and
in residential treatment programs of longer duration.
Hattie and colleagues (1997) reviewed 96 studies via a meta-analysis of research
pertaining to adventure programs. The researchers grouped 40 major outcomes observed
into six categories: leadership, self-concept, academic, personality, interpersonal
and “adventuresomeness.” Results indicated a mild effect comparable to traditional
classroom-based programs, but not nearly as effective as overall psychotherapy. Follow-
up effects of adventure programs appeared to be more positive. Long-term effects were
greater than traditional classroom-based programs indicating greater transfer and
maintenance of learning over time.
The authors noted that the effect sizes were largely determined from studies
conducted with adult businessmen and women or students. The studies conducted
with delinquent youth or clinical populations were generally even higher than noted
above indicating that the aforementioned results are increasingly relevant for the latter
populations. Effects were also greater for wilderness versus adventure programs and
programs of longer duration (those lasting more than 20 days). The individual effects
noted are primarily associated with self-regulation such as independence, decision
making, assertiveness, self-understanding, confidence, self-efficacy, and internal
locus of control. Finally, there were substantial effects on leadership, personality, and
adventuresome but the authors report that these were less sustainable over time.
Cason and Gillis (1994) conducted a meta-analysis of 43 adventure-based research
studies in which adolescents served as subjects. The findings revealed over 235 effect
sizes describing 19 outcome measures. Effect sizes represent the amount of change
participants experienced at the conclusion of each study and the outcome measure
represents the areas where change occurred. The 19 outcome measures were grouped
into seven categories: self-concept, behavioral assessment by others, attitude surveys,
locus of control, clinical scales, grades, and school attendance. The highest effect sizes
occurred in clinical scales, grades, school attendance, and attitude surveys. The authors
speculated that the large clinical scale effect sizes may be due to the fact that the clinical
Chapter 2: Adventure Therapy 31
scales were used primarily with people receiving residential services, and because the
adventure experiences with these individuals may be more intense than with participants
residing in the community.
Programs of moderate to extended duration (1–10 months) accounted for the
greatest difference in effect sizes, suggesting that adventure programs that are longer
in duration may be more effective. Younger adolescents tended to benefit more from
participation than older adolescents regardless of the population served such as adjudi-
cated youth, individuals with emotional or physical disabilities, at-risk adolescents, and
youth without disabilities. Research studies rated by the authors as being less rigorous
(such as those having no control group or random assignment of participants) accounted
for a large portion of the effect sizes. This finding suggests that adventure therapy may
have a positive effect on adolescent’s self-concept, behaviors, attitudes, locus of control,
clinical scales, grades, and school attendance; however, more rigorous research is needed
to address issues regarding consistent outcomes and mechanisms that create change.
Summary
A considerable amount of research has been conducted to investigate effects of adventure
therapy. The application of meta-analyses and longitudinal surveys in recent years has
provided considerable evidence to support adventure therapy as a empirically based
facilitation technique. The two consistently substantiated treatment outcomes are
improved self-concept and internal locus of control.
The literature also suggests that these outcomes are gained from involvement in
long-term residential programs and therapeutically oriented programs (as opposed to
education, development or prevention programs). Although some preliminary evidence
supports the use of adventure therapy as a means to improve an individual’s body image,
leadership, academic performance, rate of recidivism, substance abuse, and depression,
additional experimental research conducted with larger samples of individuals with
varying diagnoses is needed to support these initial contentions, and to determine how
and under what conditions these effects will be delivered consistently.
CASE STUDY
Steve
Steve was a 15-year-old in the eighth grade living at home with both parents. Steve had
a history of alcohol and drug abuse including the use of marijuana and cocaine. Steve’s
father had a reported history of alcohol abuse. In conjunction with his drinking, Steve’s
father admitted to physically abusing his wife and son when he felt angry. Steve’s mother
confirmed that her husband had physically abused her and Steve; however, she had never
filed any reports with local authorities regarding this behavior. Steve’s mother did not
report a history of alcohol or drug abuse, although she admitted that she occasionally
reprimanded Steve physically when she got frustrated with the family situation.
Although Steve had never been arrested or received any treatment for his alcohol
and drug abuse, he was referred to a residential adolescent treatment program by the
school system due his negative attitude and frequent school absences. His parents agreed
to his participation in the program. Upon admission to the treatment facility Steve
displayed lethargic behavior and had a flat affect as evidenced by his monotone voice and
unwillingness to smile or maintain eye contact with the staff or other residents. When
32 Facilitation Techniques in Therapeutic Recreation, Third Edition
Steve did interact with others it was often in an angry and combative way. After several
days of observation by the staff, Steve was referred to the adventure therapy program.
Steve’s treatment goals were related to his diagnosis of mild depression, which resulted
from his lack of trust in others and himself, and his inability to communicate with others
openly and honestly regarding his family and his addictions.
Steve’s behavior improved slightly during the remainder of the first week; however,
the greatest change in his attitude came during the extended wilderness camping trip.
From the outset of the trip, Steve was challenged to take on leadership roles such as being
the sweeper. The sweeper is responsible for watching over everyone from the back of the
group. Steve eagerly approached this responsibility and received a great deal of verbal
support for his efforts from the staff and his peers. Steve was given the role of the sweeper
on one particularly long hike up to the rock site. One member began to fall far behind
the rest of the group because he was developing blisters on his feet. Steve stayed with
this person for a long time, but eventually grew angry and left his role as the sweeper
to catch up with the rest of the group. When Steve arrived at camp without the other
member, the group confronted him to ask why he arrived alone. Steve admitted that he
had left his responsibility as sweeper because he was anxious over being so far behind.
Steve had not anticipated the extent to which the rest of the group would condemn him
for his decision. That evening as the group processed the day the other members of the
group told Steve that they no longer trusted him.
The next day during the rock-climbing activity Steve could not find anyone who was
willing to belay him or to be belayed by him. As Steve sat and watched the activities, he
grew increasingly frustrated and angry. Steve made several attempts to rejoin the group,
but they would not respond to his efforts. During lunch, the facilitators confronted Steve
about the mornings’ activities. Steve admitted that he was used to not trusting himself
and others, but he was not accustomed to not being trusted by others. The facilitators
encouraged Steve to confront the group about his feelings. Steve agreed to do so. After
a lengthy discussion, one member of the group agreed to partner up with Steve for
the afternoon. Steve’s attitude and behaviors changed drastically after that day. For the
remainder of the week, Steve was more willing to assist others as well as accept help
from others
Once he returned to the facility, Steve talked about how the adventure activities
related to the situations he would encounter upon his return home. Steve realized that
to be successful in school and at home he would have to rely more on others and allow
himself to receive help from others. Steve developed a list of potential resources he could
turn to when he felt as if he needed help with a situation. Steve included his mother on
the list because he recognized that she would be there to support him; however, he was
not willing to rely on his father for help. In addition, Steve made plans to become more
involved in the community youth programs operated in his neighborhood.
At the time of his 2-month follow-up, Steve had improved his attendance at school
and was maintaining his grades. He reported that he was continuing to be involved in the
community youth program and had helped to organize and lead one camping trip for
the organization. The group was currently raising money for a skiing trip in the winter.
Steve did admit to drinking alcohol over the past two months, although he stated that
he had not used any drugs. Steve’s relationship with his father remained strained. Steve
reported that he was growing comfortable talking to his mother, and he trusted that
she would be there for him.
Summary
Steve’s diagnosis of depression stemmed from his inability to trust himself and others,
and communicate his feelings to others. The adventure therapy program continually
challenged Steve to confront those issues. Through his experiences on the wild woozy
34 Facilitation Techniques in Therapeutic Recreation, Third Edition
and rock climbing Steve was able to begin to understand the extent to which his inability
to trust himself and others was affecting his life. By transferring this learning to other
aspects of his life he made adjustments in his perceptions and behaviors and successfully
resolved his problems at home.
• Acquaintance Activities
• Communication Activities
• Initiatives
Acquaintance Activities
Toss a Name
This activity is a circle game played in groups of 8 to 10 people. A leader begins the
game by saying his or her first name before tossing a ball to the person on his or her
right or left. The participants are then asked to continue passing the ball in the same
direction after stating their name. When the leader again receives the ball, he or she
calls out someone’s name in the circle and tosses the ball to him or her. That person
calls another individual’s name and tosses the ball to them and so on. The leader allows
the participants to continue tossing the ball until the participants are familiar with each
other’s names. The leader then adds an additional ball. The additional ball increases the
frequency of names being called and the activity level of the game.
Communication Activities
All Aboard
The intent of this activity is to have the entire group simultaneously stand on a platform,
which is raised approximately two feet off the ground (Note: 12 to 15 adults can usually
fit on a 2 ft. x 2 ft. platform). If a raised platform is not available, the leader may place a
piece of plywood on the ground. However, close observation is necessary to ensure that
all participants have their feet off the ground. A participant must have both feet off the
ground to be counted as on the platform. In addition, the entire group must hold their
balanced pose for at least five seconds.
Blindfold Shapes
This activity is played in a group of any size. Participants are asked to form a circle,
put on blindfolds (or close their eyes), and are given a 75 to 150” rope. While keeping
at least one hand on the rope at all times, participants are asked to make a distinct
square, triangle, pentagon, and other shapes. When participants agree that the shape is
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
— Sitä kenraali Löfbergkin sanoo. Mutta kaikki eivät ole yhtä
voimakkaat luonteeltaan ja rohkeat kuin neiti Fährling.
— Uskon sen kyllä. Mutta sen sijaan voi lohdutus olla kahta
kalliimpi, kun sen vihdoin on saanut. Onhan esimerkiksi teilläkin Elli,
joka pienellä kädellään poistaa kaikki teidän huolenne.
Elsa naurahti.
Elli tanssi luutnantti Tauben kanssa. Hän tanssi hyvin, se oli Antin
myönnettävä ja jonkunlaisella mielihyvällä hän seurasi Ellin sulavia
liikkeitä. Taube ei vaan ollut hänelle mieleen. Hänen katseensa oli
liian lämmin ja lähentelevä ja Ellikin silmäsi häneen niin kirkkaasti.
Mutta Antti poisti nuo ajatukset heti paikalla, olihan Elli niin
ystävällinen ja herttainen kaikille.
Niin, hän rakasti Elliä, tuota hentoa, suloista lasta, joka oli
päivänpaistetta varten syntynyt. Hän tasoittaisi hänen tiensä, niin
ettei hänen koskaan tarvitsisi mitään kärsiä, eikä tulla katkeraksi,
niinkuin Hertta. Hertta parka! Hänen silmänsä olivat syvät ja
surulliset, niiden katsetta ei helposti unohtanut. Mutta miksi hän oli
katkera ja tyly ja miksi hän puhui niin ivallisesti Antin suhteesta
Elliin? Olisiko hän huomannut sen, mitä Antti ei itsekkään käsittänyt,
ei ajatellut, ainoastaan joskus hämärästi tunsi… Ei, hän oli vain niin
hermostunut ja väsynyt tänä iltana. — — —
Puoliyö oli jo kulunut, kun Hertta astui kotiinsa. Kotiportilla hän näki
tulta isänsä ikkunasta. Isä oli siis vielä ylhäällä, ja jos hän ei
erehtynyt, niin istui Väisänen hänen toverinansa pöydän toisessa
päässä.
— En tanssinut yhtään.
— No, hyvä lapsi, mitä kummaa siinä on. Hän on minun läheinen
ystäväni, ja hän lähtee sinne joka tapauksessa.
Väisänen oli koko ajan ollut ääneti, mutta terävillä silmillään hän
seurasi pienintäkin ilmeen vivahdusta Hertan kasvoissa. Hän näytti
niin itsetietoiselta ja varmalta omasta asiastansa.
Hän oli tarjoutunut ostamaan taloa, kun kapteeni oli kireitä aikoja
valitellut. Mutta kauppahinnasta he eivät voineet sopia. Silloin oli
Väisäsen mieleen juolahtanut toinen tuuma. Hän päätti naida Hertan,
olihan hän sievä tyttö, joskin hiukan kopea, ja talon hän saisi aivan
kaupantekijäisiksi. Samalla Hertta aukaisisi hänelle tien korkeampiin
piireihin, ainoa mikä häneltä nykyisessä asemassaan vielä puuttui.
Ja saadakseen aikeensa onnistumaan, hän oli mielestään keksinyt
erinomaisen keinon. Hän pyysi kapteenilta Herttaa vaimoksensa.
Hän sanoi rakastavansa häntä ja katselleensa häntä jo kauan.
Huone oli melkein tyhjä. Ikkunan luona pieni pöytä ja sen edessä
horjuva tuoli. Nurkassa vuode, jossa joku lepäsi rääsyjen alla.
— En minä, hyvä rouva, juo, mistä sitä viinaan rahaa saisi, kun ei
ole leipäänkään. Jos minä edes olisin yksin kärsimässä, mutta vaimo
ja lapset, joilla ei ole mitään. Se on isännän, tuo pullo tuossa.
— Entäs äiti?