PDF Test Bank For Modern Labor Economics Theory and Public Policy 12Th Edition Ronald G Ehrenberg Download Online Ebook Full Chapter

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 38

Test Bank for Modern Labor Economics

Theory and Public Policy 12th Edition


Ronald G Ehrenberg Download
Visit to download the full and correct content document: https://testbankbell.com/dow
nload/test-bank-for-modern-labor-economics-theory-and-public-policy-12th-edition-ro
nald-g-ehrenberg-download/
More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant
download maybe you interests ...

Test Bank for Modern Labor Economics: Theory and Public


Policy, 13th Edition, Ronald G. Ehrenberg Robert S.
Smith Ronald G. Ehrenberg Robert S. Smith

http://testbankbell.com/product/test-bank-for-modern-labor-
economics-theory-and-public-policy-13th-edition-ronald-g-
ehrenberg-robert-s-smith-ronald-g-ehrenberg-robert-s-smith/

Test Bank for Modern Labor Economics: Theory and Public


Policy, 13th Edition, Ronald G. Ehrenberg, Robert S.
Smith Ronald G. Ehrenberg, Robert S. Smith

http://testbankbell.com/product/test-bank-for-modern-labor-
economics-theory-and-public-policy-13th-edition-ronald-g-
ehrenberg-robert-s-smith-ronald-g-ehrenberg-robert-s-smith-i/

Solution Manual for Modern Labor Economics: Theory and


Public Policy, 13th Edition, Ronald G. Ehrenberg,
Robert S. Smith Ronald G. Ehrenberg, Robert S. Smith

http://testbankbell.com/product/solution-manual-for-modern-labor-
economics-theory-and-public-policy-13th-edition-ronald-g-
ehrenberg-robert-s-smith-ronald-g-ehrenberg-robert-s-sm/

International Economics Theory and Policy Krugman 10th


Edition Test Bank

http://testbankbell.com/product/international-economics-theory-
and-policy-krugman-10th-edition-test-bank/
International Economics Theory and Policy Krugman 10th
Edition Solutions Manual

http://testbankbell.com/product/international-economics-theory-
and-policy-krugman-10th-edition-solutions-manual/

Test Bank for Health Economics and Policy 5th Edition


James W Henderson Download

http://testbankbell.com/product/test-bank-for-health-economics-
and-policy-5th-edition-james-w-henderson-download/

Test Bank for Environmental Economics and Management


Theory Policy and Applications, 6th Edition : Callan

http://testbankbell.com/product/test-bank-for-environmental-
economics-and-management-theory-policy-and-applications-6th-
edition-callan/

International Economics Theory and Policy Krugman


Obstfeld 9th Edition Solutions Manual

http://testbankbell.com/product/international-economics-theory-
and-policy-krugman-obstfeld-9th-edition-solutions-manual/

Solution Manual for Environmental Economics and


Management Theory, Policy, and Applications, 6th
Edition

http://testbankbell.com/product/solution-manual-for-
environmental-economics-and-management-theory-policy-and-
applications-6th-edition/
Test Bank for Modern Labor Economics Theory and Public Policy 12th Edition Ronald G Ehrenber

Test Bank for Modern Labor Economics Theory and


Public Policy 12th Edition Ronald G Ehrenberg
Download

To download the complete and accurate content document, go to:


https://testbankbell.com/download/test-bank-for-modern-labor-economics-theory-and-
public-policy-12th-edition-ronald-g-ehrenberg-download/

Visit TestBankBell.com to get complete for all chapters


Modern Labor Economics, 12e (Ehrenberg/Smith)
Chapter 6 Supply of Labor to the Economy: The Decision to Work

1) A person who receives time-and-a-half overtime for working more than 8 hours per day will
have a ________ which is ________ beyond 8 hours of labor.
A) budget constraint; flatter
B) indifference curve; flatter
C) budget constraint; steeper
D) indifference curve; steeper
Answer: C
Question Status: Old

2) If leisure is a normal good, then an increase in non-labor income will cause desired hours of
work to
A) increase.
B) decrease.
C) stay the same.
D) either decrease or increase.
Answer: B
Question Status: Old

3) Through the substitution effect, a decrease in the wage rate will cause ________ in the
quantity of leisure desired.
A) an increase
B) a decrease
C) no change
D) an ambiguous change
Answer: A
Question Status: Old

4) If income is held constant and the wage rate increases, the desired hours of work will
A) increase.
B) decrease.
C) stay the same.
D) change ambiguously.
Answer: A
Question Status: Old

5) A wage increase creates a substitution effect which leads the worker to desire ________
leisure, and an income effect which leads the worker to desire ________ leisure.
A) more; less
B) less; more
C) less; less
D) more; more
Answer: B
Question Status: Old

1
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
6) An increase in the marginal tax rate will cause
A) a pure income effect.
B) a pure substitution effect.
C) both an income and a substitution effect.
D) neither an income nor a substitution effect.
Answer: C
Question Status: Old

7) An increase in nonlabor income due to a rise in the value of stocks and bonds will cause
A) a pure income effect.
B) a pure substitution effect.
C) both an income and a substitution effect.
D) neither an income nor a substitution effect.
Answer: A
Question Status: Old

8) If Alice's wage increases from $6.00 per hour to $6.50 per hour, then
A) she will want to work more hours than before her raise.
B) she will want to work fewer hours than before her raise.
C) she will want to work the same number of hours as before her raise.
D) she may want to work more, fewer, or the same number of hours as before her raise.
Answer: D
Question Status: Old

9) If Gene receives a raise in his hourly wage and decides he would like to increase his hours of
work, we know that
A) his income effect is greater than his substitution effect.
B) his substitution effect is greater than his income effect.
C) his income and substitution effects are equal.
D) his income and substitution effects reinforce each other.
Answer: B
Question Status: Old

10) Indifference curves drawn with leisure and income on the axes have negative slopes
A) because people are willing to give up income to obtain more leisure and vice versa.
B) if a person likes leisure more than income.
C) because they cannot cross one another.
D) unless one of the goods is inferior.
Answer: A
Question Status: Old

2
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
11) On the portion of a worker's labor supply curve that is backward-bending,
A) the substitution effect outweighs the income effect.
B) the income effect outweighs the substitution effect.
C) the income effect is negative.
D) the substitution effect is negative.
Answer: B
Question Status: Old

12) Studies of the hours of work of older men have found that the substitution effect dominates
the income effect. This suggests that, other things the same,
A) an increase in non-work expenses will cause older men to work shorter hours.
B) an increase in the tax rate on income will cause older men to work longer hours.
C) tax changes have no effect on their labor supply.
D) older men will retire earlier in those careers where wages fall more as they get older.
Answer: D
Question Status: Old

13) If a worker's desired hours of labor do not change after a decrease in his wage rate, then
A) his income effect dominates his substitution effect.
B) his substitution effect dominates his income effect.
C) his income and substitution effects are of equal magnitude.
D) his income and substitution effects are small in absolute value.
Answer: C
Question Status: Old

14) The Earned Income Tax Credit will probably ________ the labor force participation of low-
wage workers and ________ the labor market hours of those with earning in the range that the
tax credit is being phased out.
A) increase; decrease
B) increase; increase
C) decrease; increase
D) decrease; decrease
Answer: A
Question Status: Old

15) A decrease in the implicit tax rate on welfare benefits serves as


A) an incentive to work fewer hours.
B) an incentive to work more hours.
C) a way to decrease the incomes of welfare recipients.
D) a way to decrease spending on benefits.
Answer: B
Question Status: Old

3
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
16) An Earned Income Tax Credit will
A) increase the reservation wage of low-wage workers.
B) increase the wage rate of some low-wage workers to a rate which is above the reservation
wage.
C) create only an income effect.
D) create only a substitution effect.
Answer: B
Question Status: Old

17) Empirical studies suggest that the responsiveness of married working women's hours to wage
changes is ________ than for men and that they are ________ to enter or leave the labor force
due to changes in their wages.
A) no different; more likely
B) no different; less likely
C) greater; more likely
D) greater; less likely
Answer: A
Question Status: Old

18) Empirical estimates show that for men


A) the income effect is greater than the substitution effect.
B) the substitution effect is greater than the income effect.
C) the income and substitution effects are both large so that wage changes have no effect on
hours.
D) the income and substitution effects are both small so that wage changes have no effect on
hours.
Answer: D
Question Status: Old

19) A person with ________ indifference curves is most likely to decide not to participate in the
labor force.
A) flat
B) steep
C) straight
D) upward-sloping
Answer: B
Question Status: Old

20) Fixed costs of working will cause ________ the number of people choosing to work zero
hours.
A) an increase in
B) a decrease in
C) no change in
D) an ambiguous change in
Answer: A
Question Status: Revised

4
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
21) An individual's reservation wage
A) is determined by supply and demand in the labor market.
B) is the value of the marginal hour of leisure time if the individual does no work.
C) is the amount of money the individual earns by working an additional hour.
D) decreases as non-labor income increases.
Answer: B
Question Status: New

22)

Consider the above figure. If the wage rate is initially $8 per hour and subsequently increases to
$12 per hour, then
A) the income effect dominates and optimal hours of work increase by 3 hours.
B) the income effect dominates and optimal hours of work decrease by 3 hours.
C) the substitution effect dominates and optimal hours of work increase by 3 hours.
D) the substitution effect dominates and optimal hours of work decrease by 3 hours.
Answer: C
Question Status: New

23) In 1986 Congress drastically cut the marginal tax rate on upper income levels from 50% to
28%. Empirical evidence analyzing the labor supply effects of the tax cut found that women in
the high income tax bracket
A) did not respond in any significant way to the tax cut, as their high level of income ensured
that they were already content with their labor supply choices.
B) experienced offsetting substitution and income effects.
C) increased both labor force participation and hours of work significantly.
D) reduced their labor force participation and hours worked significantly because of a dominant
income effect.
Answer: C
Question Status: New

5
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
24) The figure above illustrates a "spiked" budget constraint attendant to income replacement
programs such as workers' compensation and unemployment insurance. Assume that, prior to
injury or unemployment, the worker earns $E0 per time period, works H0 = A - L0 hours, and
enjoys utility level U1. In order to minimize the work disincentives associated with income
replacement while maintaining the worker near the original level of utility, the program ought to
pay a benefit
A) a little bit less than Ag.
B) equal to the original earnings level, E0.
C) greater than AC.
D) a little bit less than AC.
Answer: A
Question Status: New

25) A worker is indifferent between job one lasting 4 hours a day, job two lasting 8 hours a day,
and job three lasting 12 hours a day. Job two pays $10 an hour and tangency between the
indifference curve and the budget constraint occurs at 8 hours. One can conclude that
A) job one pays less per day but more per hour.
B) job three pays more per day and more per hour.
C) both A and B are true.
D) neither A nor B is true.
Answer: C
Question Status: Revised

26) Empirical evidence on the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) shows that expansions in that
program from the latter 1980s through the mid-1990s caused
A) significant withdrawal from the labor force by teenagers.
B) significant increase in the labor force participation of single mothers.
C) adult men to significantly increase their total hours of work.
D) married women to significantly increase their hours of work.
Answer: B
Question Status: New

6
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
27) An increase in the wage rate when the substitution effect dominates will ________ labor
force participation and ________ hours of work.
A) increase; increase
B) increase; decrease
C) decrease; decrease
D) decrease; increase
Answer: A
Question Status: Revised

28) An increase in travel time to work will likely ________ labor force participation and
________ hours spent working and traveling (of those working and traveling before and after the
wage increase).
A) increase; increase
B) increase; decrease
C) decrease; decrease
D) decrease; increase
Answer: D
Question Status: Old

29) Mary earns $20 an hour and works 10 hours a week. She gets a raise to $30 an hour but at
the same time her fixed weekly work expenses go up $100. If she continues to work, she will
most likely
A) continue to work 10 hours.
B) increase her hours of work.
C) decrease her hours of work.
D) decrease her hours of work if the income effect dominates the substitution effect.
Answer: B
Question Status: Old

30) A professor declared "with the recent drop in the value of my stock portfolio, I will have to
put off retirement by another two years." This decision reflects
A) the substitution effect.
B) the income effect.
C) the portfolio effect.
D) the effect of a budget constraint with a spike.
Answer: B
Question Status: Old

7
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
31) Indifference curves drawn with income and leisure on the axes are convex to the origin of the
graph because
A) people are willing to give up income to obtain more leisure and vice versa.
B) the marginal hour of leisure time becomes less valuable as one works fewer hours and more
valuable as one works more hours.
C) the marginal hour of leisure time becomes more valuable as one works fewer hours and less
valuable as one works more hours.
D) utility increases as income and leisure increase.
Answer: B
Question Status: New

32) A welfare program offers $4000 of benefits to those not working. For those working, it
reduces benefits dollar for dollar until there are no benefits to be paid. The program is then
modified so that for every dollar earned, benefits are only reduced by 50 cents. Mr. X earned
$6000 under the old program. What will be the effect of the new program (noting that he is in the
range to receive benefits)?
A) Both his income and substitution effect will decrease his desired hours of work.
B) Both his income and substitution effect will increase his desired hours of work.
C) His income effect will increase his desired hours of work, but his substitution effect will
decrease his desired hours of work.
D) His income effect will decrease his desired hours of work, but his substitution effect will
increase his desired hours of work.
Answer: A
Question Status: Old

33) A country has no welfare program. Then it introduces the following program: everyone gets
$4000 if they work more than 1000 hours a year (on top of what they earn). The effect of this
event will be to ________ the labor force participation and the effect of this event on those who
were working more than 1000 hours will be to ________ hours of work.
A) increase, increase
B) decrease, increase
C) increase, decrease
D) decrease, decrease
Answer: C
Question Status: Revised

34) Many working mothers have to pay for childcare costs. If they don't work, they do not have
to pay for these costs. If childcare costs go up dramatically, the effect will be to ________ the
labor force participation of working mothers and to ________ the hours of work for those
mothers who continue to work.
A) decrease, decrease
B) increase, increase
C) increase, decrease
D) decrease, increase
Answer: D
Question Status: Old

8
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
35) The property tax goes up $4000 a year. This will cause those who are working to work
________ hours and their annual income to go ________ $4000.
A) more, up by more than
B) more, up by less than
C) fewer, down by less than
D) fewer, down by more than
Answer: B
Question Status: Revised

36) "The wage rate (w) is the 'price' that the labor market attaches to an hour of the individual's
time." How is this any different from the individual's marginal rate of substitution between
leisure and income? Explain carefully.
Answer: The marginal rate of substitution between leisure and income represents the dollar
value an individual attaches to the marginal hour of time. The MRS is subjective to the
individual and determined by the individual's tastes and preferences for income and leisure. The
wage rate is objectively determined by market forces and represents the amount that an
individual would be paid for an hour of work time. It is a price in the sense that the wage is the
amount an employer must pay in order to rent an hour of labor service.
Question Status: New

37) Why are indifference curves between money income and leisure convex to the origin of the
graph? In your discussion, introduce the concept of marginal rate of substitution between leisure
and money income and explain its relevance to the convexity property of the indifference curves.
Answer: Convex indifference curves reflect diminishing marginal utility in leisure and in money
income. The marginal rate of substitution between leisure and money income is the amount of
money that an individual would need to be compensated with for sacrifice of an hour of leisure
in order to maintain a given level of utility. The MRS is also the absolute value of the slope of
the tangent line to a given point on an indifference curve. Convexity in the indifference curve
means that the indifference curve becomes progressively steeper as income is substituted for
leisure along the curve. As income is substituted for leisure, the marginal dollar becomes
progressively less valuable and the marginal hour of leisure becomes progressively more
valuable, both due to the diminishing marginal utility property assumed for the goods. Hence, as
income is substituted for leisure, the marginal hour of time becomes progressively more valuable
and this is exactly what is reflected in a convex indifference curve. Its slope increases as income
is substituted for leisure, the slope is the MRS, therefore the MRS increases as one has less
leisure and more money income when the indifference curve is convex.
Question Status: New

9
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
38) How does an increase in non-labor income affect desired hours of work for a labor force
participant? Use indifference curve analysis to illustrate and support your answer. State any
assumptions that you make.
Answer: Assuming leisure is a normal good, an increase in non-labor income moves the
individual to a higher indifference curve that is steeper than the new budget constraint at the
initial level of leisure consumption. The extra non-labor income increases the value of the
marginal hour of leisure. Because the indifference curve is steeper than the budget line at the
initial level of leisure consumption following the increase in non-labor income, the individual is
willing to sacrifice more income to obtain an additional hour of leisure time than is necessitated
given the current wage. Working fewer hours and enjoying more leisure, therefore, will raise the
individual's utility further still. The individual should move to a point of tangency between an
indifference curve and the new budget line, which will be to the right of the point reflecting the
original level of leisure consumption on the new budget line..
Question Status: New

39) Frankie and Johnny can both earn a wage rate of $10 per hour and, coincidentally, both have
$100 per week in non-labor income. Assume that both have T = 100 hours per week to allocate
to leisure and work. Frankie chooses to work 40 hours per week. Johnny, on the other hand,
chooses not to work at all! Use indifference curve analysis to account for why two individuals
confronting the same wage rate and with the same amount of non-labor income make such
different labor supply choices.
Answer: At any given leisure-income combination Johnny attaches much greater value to an
hour of leisure time than does Frankie. In graphical terms Johnny's set of indifference curves are
much steeper than Frankie's. Given Johnny's preferences, he maximizes utility by choosing not
to work because he requires more in compensation even for the sacrifice of the first hour of
leisure than the $10 the labor market is willing to pay him for that hour. Frankie, on the other
hand, finds the $10 wage more than sufficient to compensate her for many hours of her leisure
time. It is only at the point where she's worked 40 hours during the week that she finds sacrifice
of another hour of leisure for $10 in compensation raises her utility level no further.
Question Status: New

40) Jack currently works 38 hours per week at a wage rate of $15 per hour. His marginal rate of
substitution is $20 per hour. Is Jack's utility maximized? If yes, explain why. If no, explain
why not and discuss what Jack should do in order to further increase utility.
Answer: Jack's utility isn't maximized. His MRS implies he's willing to sacrifice $20 in order to
enjoy an additional hour of leisure. Given his wage rate, however, he only gives up $15 by
working one less hour. Hence working fewer hours will increase his utility level as he sacrifices
less income than he's willing to in order to enjoy more leisure time. Jack should substitute
leisure for income (i.e., work fewer hours) to the point where his MRS equals $15.
Question Status: New

10
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
41) "People who value leisure more highly have indifference curves that are generally steeper.
People who do not value leisure highly have relatively flat indifference curves." Explain the
quote.
Answer: The absolute value of the slope of the tangent line to a point on the indifference curve
is the marginal rate of substitution between leisure and money income. Intuitively, the MRS
represents the amount of money income an individual would give up in order to enjoy one
additional hour of leisure time with no change in utility. The MRS is, in essence, the dollar
value of the marginal hour of leisure time. Individuals that value leisure highly will have, other
things equal, larger marginal rates of substitution, which in turn implies that they will have
steeper indifference curves at a given combination of income and leisure.
Question Status: New

42) Other things equal, the less convex is an individual's indifference curve, the greater will be
the substitution effect of a wage change. Explain why.
Answer: The substitution effect of a change in the wage is the change in leisure consumption (or
hours worked) induced by a change in leisure's opportunity cost while holding utility constant.
An increase in the wage rate other things equal implies that the MRS < W at the original income-
leisure combination. Hence the individual will be compensated for an hour of work by more
than is necessary to maintain utility at a given level. The individual therefore has incentive to
work more hours (i.e., substitute income for leisure) as long as MRS < W. As an individual
works more hours, however, the MRS increases because leisure becomes progressively more
valuable at the margin as you have less of it. Substitution of income for leisure therefore will
ultimately restore equality between the MRS and the wage. If an indifference curve is very
convex, it won't take much substitution of income for leisure to re-equate the MRS and the wage
and the substitution effect will be relatively small. If the indifference curve is not very convex,
substitution of income for leisure will move the value of the MRS slowly, hence it will take a lot
of substitution of income for leisure to restore equality between the MRS and the wage rate.
Accordingly, the substitution effect (the change in hours worked and leisure consumed) will be
comparatively large when the indifference curve is not very convex.
Question Status: New

43) Consider two workers–Averil and Taylor. They both earn the same wage rate and neither
has any non-labor income. Averil chooses to work 40 hours per week and Taylor chooses to
work 10 hours per week. Due to improving macroeconomic conditions both workers experience
an exogenous 10% increase in their common wage rate. Explain which worker is likely to have a
larger income effect as a result of the wage increase. Illustrate with the appropriate graph.
Answer: The relevant figure in the text is Figure 6.11. A wage change changes both purchasing
power and the opportunity cost of leisure time. The income effect relates to the first
phenomenon. Suppose both Averil and Taylor experience an increase in wage of a dollar per
hour. Then Averil earns an additional $40 per week given her current work schedule. Taylor
who gets the same wage increase only gets an extra $10 per week in income on her current work
schedule. Though the wage has changed by the same degree for both workers, it confers a much
larger change in purchasing power to the worker that works more hours in the first place and
therefore the income effect of the wage change will be larger for Averil and smaller for Taylor.
Question Status: New

44) "When a worker's wage rate changes, there are two opposing effects—an income effect and a

11
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
substitution effect." Explain the meaning of the quote.
Answer: When the wage rate changes, two things occur simultaneously—the worker's
purchasing power changes and the opportunity cost of leisure time changes. The income effect
and the substitution effect reflect the change in leisure (or hours worked) that occur as a result of
these two opposing forces. The income effect is the change in leisure consumption (or hours of
work) due to the change in purchasing power conferred by the wage change, holding the wage at
its initial value. The substitution effect, on the other hand, is the change in leisure consumption
(or hours of work) that occurs due to the change in the opportunity cost of leisure, holding the
worker at a given utility level (thus holding real purchasing power constant).
Question Status: New

45) What is the earned income tax credit (EITC)? The EITC probably increases labor force
participation but probably also reduces hours worked by those already working. Explain why in
both instances using indifference curve analysis.
Answer: The Earned Income Tax Credit is a tax credit that goes to low income workers and is
based on hours worked. The EITC is administered through the federal income tax by by the
Internal revenue Service. The EITC is viewed as an income maintenance program that preserves
work incentives unlike traditional welfare programs. The EITC was expanded significantly
during the 1990s under President Clinton.

Students should draw an EITC budget constraint, as in Figure 6.17 in order to discuss the effects
of the EITC on labor force participation and on hours of work. The EITC increases labor force
participation because it effectively increases the wage rate paid to workers supplying few or no
hours of work. Labor force participation requires that the wage exceed the reservation wage. By
increasing the wage on the order of 40 percent, the labor force participation condition is satisfied
for more individuals under the EITC, other things equal.

The EITC budget constraint has three distinct zones. The first zone, in the lowest income range,
has a wage greater than the market wage, implying a pro-work substitution effect and an adverse-
to-work income effect. The second zone, in the middle income range, is parallel to the original
budget constraint, implying a pure, adverse-to-work income effect. As the EITC is phased out at
higher incomes, the third zone implies both an income effect and a substitution effect that are
adverse to work. Though empirical evidence confirms that hours of work fall under the EITC,
the effect is relatively small.
Question Status: New

46) The female labor force participation rate


A) doubled because of World War II and has remained roughly constant at near 50% since that
time.
B) dropped sharply from approximately 60% in 2000 to under 45% in 2011 because of the Great
Recession.
C) increased steadily from about 30% in 1950 to approximately 60% in 2000.
D) is now about the same as the overall male labor force participation rate thanks to the
eradication of gender inequality.
Answer: C
Question Status: New

12
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
Test Bank for Modern Labor Economics Theory and Public Policy 12th Edition Ronald G Ehrenber

47) The average workweek in U.S. manufacturing plants


A) has dropped steadily since 1960 from about 60 hours per week to 35 hours per week
currently.
B) has increased from about 35 hours per week in 1970 to about 45 hours per week by 2010.
C) fluctuates significantly over the business cycle, averaging about 50 hours per week at
business cycle peaks and 32 hours per week at business cycle troughs.
D) dropped from about 55 hours per week in the early part of the 20th century to approximately
40 hours per week by 1950 and since 1950, aside from small variation over the business cycle,
has remained at about 40 hours per week with no trend in either direction.
Answer: D
Question Status: New

48) The opportunity cost of leisure


A) is the wage that one could earn by working an additional hour.
B) is the amount of income that would be necessary to hold an individual's utility level constant
were they to work an additional hour (that is, give up an hour of leisure time).
C) is equivalent to the individual's non-labor income.
D) is directly related to the individual's level of leisure consumption per time period.
Answer: A
Question Status: New

49) If an individual's income effect is stronger than the individual's substitution effect, a wage
increase will cause that individual to
A) increase hours worked, and this increase will be larger than if the same change in wealth were
caused by a change in non-labor income.
B) decrease hours worked, but this decrease will be smaller than if the same change in wealth
were caused by a change in non-labor income.
C) decrease hours worked, and this decrease will be larger than if the same change in wealth
were caused by a change in non-labor income.
D) increase hours worked, but this increase will be smaller than if the same change in wealth
were caused by a change in non-labor income.
Answer: B
Question Status: New

13
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.

Visit TestBankBell.com to get complete for all chapters


Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
"H'm," the other answered.

"Such a lot o' facts, I've had to note 'em down for fear
of forgetting. Let's see—"

"'Working-men are like sheep.' Some truth in that. I've


heard say as how if one sheep jumps over a broomstick, all
the rest 'll follow to save walking round it."

"The aristocracy is 'bloated.' Don't see much meanin' in


the term; but, howsoever, it looks grand, so we'll let it
pass."

"'Men are not men, but has to work like dogs.' Shouldn't
wonder. Little enough o' work Rover gets through in the
twenty-four hours—and little enough many o' them get
through. But he does a deal o' barking."

"'Peter Pope yonder is a friend o' the working-man.'


Werry disinterested friend!"

Stuckey paused, and gave a side-glance at his


companion.

"Well, I won't go for to say whether Peter Pope or Peter


Stuckey is the wiser man o' the two; but I won't go for to
say I haven't a notion. Any way he's uncommon like to his
namesake of Rome, layin' down the law for everybody."

"There's nothing on earth that can't be made out in the


way of talk," the other said briefly.

"You're a sensible fellow, Holdfast, and no mistake. Now


what's your opinion about this here notion of a strike?"
asked Stuckey, putting one hand up to his mouth with a
confidential air.
"I'll not move in the matter. But it'll come about without
me," Holdfast replied, wearing the look of one who sees
impending evil.

"Trust Pope for that; he'd be a loser if it didn't. They'd


every man Jack of 'em put his head into a noose if Pope told
'em it was right. Well—an' I've got to be off," said Stuckey,
as a fresh burst of shouts arose.

He lingered till it ceased, then singled out a man


standing near—

"I say, Stevens; you and the rest is hearing a lot o'
rayther startling assertions. If you'll take a bit o' friendly
'adwice,' you'll just ask Mr. Pope a question from me. Which
is—how much that there Society pays him for the making of
his grand speeches?"

Stuckey's voice was very distinct. Peter Pope had to


defer the winding-up of his oration a full quarter of an hour,
that he might do away with the effect of Stuckey's parting
suggestion.
CHAPTER III.
THE STRIKE BEGUN.

"THERE!" said Roger Stevens, setting down his bag of


tools, with the air of a man who has done a noble deed, and
is aware of the same.

Martha's lips parted, then closed fast. She stood looking


without a word.

"Nobody'll dare say now that we're to be trodden on like


reptiles," continued Stevens loftily.

"Who ever did say it?" asked Martha.

"Well, Pope said they might; and they won't be able


now."

"Then the strike's begun, and it's all up!" faltered the
wife.

"All up! It's all just begun! There's thousands out to-
day, and there 'll be a thousand more to-morrow. The
masters won't stand that long. We'll make our own terms.
We'll be the masters now!!"

"Mr. Pope says so, I s'pose," murmured Martha.

"And good reason he has to say it too. I tell you, he


knows what he's about. 'Tain't often you come across a
cleverer chap than Pope."

"I wish he'd kept himself and his cleverness away! I've
a notion he wouldn't be so ready for the strike, if it was he
that had to lose his living by it."

"Well, I never did in all my life see a woman like you—


not a bit of spirit!" declared Stevens. "One 'ud think you
cared for nothing in the world but food and drink."

"Why, it's food and drink you're striking for now, isn't it?
Drink 'specially, and tobacco," said Martha; with tart truth.
"Leastways, it's more money to get your drink and tobacco
with."

"No, it isn't," returned Roger loudly. "It's because a rise


is our due! It's for public spirit, and to show we won't be
trampled on. That's what it's for. There's a lot of men gone
out to-day who haven't got no particular grievances, and
they're just striking for the principle of the thing—just for to
help us."

"They'd be a deal wiser if they stayed in for the principle


of the thing," said Martha.

"You've not got a spark of spirit in you," grumbled


Roger. "Look at Mrs. Hicks! She don't hold her husband
back. She's been pushing him on, and encouraging him
from the first to act like a man."

"Mrs. Hicks may, but Mrs. Holdfast don't; and I'd a deal
sooner be like Mrs. Holdfast."

Roger flung away impatiently out of the house; and


Martha walked to the open door.

A busy street met her gaze,—busy, that is to say, as


regarded the amount of moving life, not as regarded actual
employment. The road was filled with scattered groups of
working-men in their working-dress; some of whom wore
looks of depression and anxiety, though the prevailing
sensation seemed to be of triumph.

For the Strike was begun!

The masters could not long hold out. Success, speedy


success, in the shape of higher wages and shorter hours,
might be confidently expected. So Peter Pope declared.
Capital could not but fail in a tussle with labour; for what
was capital without labour? Peter Pope forgot to ask the
equally forcible question—What was labour without capital?
It is so easy to say, What is a man's head without his body?
—But then one naturally inquires next, What is a man's
body without his head? Unless the two work in harmony,
both come to grief; and a wrong done by the one to the
other always recoils upon itself. This is not more true of the
joint existence, a man's head and body, than of that other
joint existence, Labour and Capital.

Still, Peter Pope said things were all right; and who
should know better than Peter Pope?

Those among the strikers who were members of a


Trades Union felt comfortably sure of a certain amount of
help, to carry them through the fight.

The larger proportion, who were not members of any


such Union, indulged in vague hopes of being somehow or
other tided through.

For the strikers belonged to more trades than one in the


town; some having gone out, as Stevens implied, "on
principle," or in sympathy with the rest.

Peter Pope was not far off. Martha could see him at a
little distance, haranguing a group of listeners. She turned
away with a sigh, and found Sarah Holdfast by her side.
"Stevens is one of them, I suppose," Mrs. Holdfast said
kindly.

Martha tried to speak, and her voice was choked.

"Come, I'll go indoors for a minute. Baby is asleep, and


Bessie's such a steady little lass, I may leave them just for
a bit."

Martha was glad to get out of sight of that exultant


crowd, looking to her foreboding sight so like a flock of
thoughtless sheep, frisking to the slaughter. Peter Pope's
illustration had not been inapt.

"How well the children do look, all of them!" said Mrs.


Holdfast. "Just see Bobbie's cheeks! And I'm sure Baby
Harry is a beauty. Hasn't he fat arms?"

"And how long are they going to keep fat, I wonder?"


asked Martha.

Mrs. Holdfast hardly knew what to say. She stroked the


head of little three years-old Harry, as he nestled up to his
mother. Martha took such a pride in her children. They had
hitherto rivalled Mrs. Holdfast's in healthy freshness.

"I'd work my fingers to the bone, if I could, to keep 'em


as they are now," said Martha. "But whatever am I to do? I
can't leave 'em alone all day, and go out to charing. I'm
sure it's little enough work my husband does at the best of
times; and now he's ready to risk starving us all, just that
he may stick up for his 'rights' as he calls it. Rights indeed!
It makes me sick to hear 'em all a-talking of their rights,"
cried Martha, with sudden energy, as she hugged little
Harry in her arms. "A man's wife and children has a right to
expect he'll give them food to eat, and clothes to wear; and
if he won't do that, he'd no business to marry."
"Men are easy led to believe whatever they're told—
provided it's one of themselves that tells them," said Mrs.
Holdfast shrewdly.

"I don't see as that's any excuse. They'd ought to have


sense to think for themselves."

"So they would, if they was all like my John," said Mrs.
Holdfast, with pardonable pride. "But there's where it is. He
reads and learns, while other folks talk."

Martha found no comfort in the thought of John


Holdfast's superiority.

"See here—" she said, looking round—"all the little


comforts we've been getting together, when we could spare
a sixpence or a shilling. And they'll all go now. I won't say
but what Roger's been a good husband in the main, letting
alone that he's so easy led. He does care for the children,
and he brings home his wages more regular than most—if
he wasn't so fond of a day's holiday, when he ought to be at
work. Talk of short hours! He's never in no danger of
overdoing hisself. But that's the way with the men. I wonder
whatever 'd happen if we women was to strike for short
hours, and knock off work, and leave things to take care of
themselves."

Mrs. Holdfast shook her head dubiously. She saw that it


was a relief to Martha to pour out.

"I'm sure I've toiled day and night for him and children,
and never wanted to complain. Roger has had a clean
home, and his clothes mended, and his Sunday dinners as
good as the best of them. And I'd just begun to think of
laying by something against a rainy day. And here's the end
of it all."
"Maybe the strike won't last long."

"Don't tell me that! You don't think so. Get a wrong


notion into a man's head, and he'll stick to it like beeswax.
They're made up of selfishness, down to their shoes; and
that's what it is! And Roger like the rest! As if four days of
work in the week wasn't little enough for a great strong
man like him—and I'm sure it's seldom he does more. As if
he couldn't put up patiently with less wages and more work
for a while, sooner than see his wife and children starve
before his eyes."

"You're talking a lot of nonsense! Like a woman," said


Stevens, standing in the doorway. "You don't know nothing
about the matter, and that's a fact! It's our rights that's got
to be considered, Pope says. We're striking for our rights!"

"I don't care for nobody's rights nor for Mr. Pope neither,
so as I've bread to put in the children's mouths," sobbed
Martha. "Do you think I don't know what you're bringing us
to? I hope I am talking like a woman! I wouldn't wish to do
anything else. I wouldn't wish to talk like the men—a set of
lazy creatures, with never a thought except for their own
comfort."

Stevens walked off, and Martha looked up pitifully.

"There now! I'm wrong! I know I'm wrong—speaking


like that to him before the children. But it's hard to be
patient. Your husband's at work still, ain't he?"

"He's at work, and he'll be at work as long as ever he


can. If many more go out in the town, the works may have
to stop for want of men to keep them going. But John 'll
only stop if he's obliged. He won't go out with the rest."

"They won't like that," said Martha.


"Maybe not," Mrs. Holdfast said quietly. "He's had a
warning already."

"A warning from the strikers!" Martha's eyes grew


round. She wondered at Mrs. Holdfast's composure.

"Yes; but he says he don't see that one sort of tyranny


is better than another. If he's a freeborn Englishman, he's
got a right to work as long as he will, and the others
haven't power to forbid him. That's what John says."

Martha sighed. "They haven't no right," she said. "But


as for power—if I was you, I should be all in a fright for
him."

"It's no manner of use expecting troubles till they


come," said Mrs. Holdfast.

CHAPTER IV.
WHAT STUCKEY THOUGHT.
"SO there's a lot more of you to-day, a-setting to work
to run your heads agin a stone wall," said Stuckey.

He had a basket of ferns in his hand, which he was


carrying home, taking Pleasant Lane on his way.

"Nothing of the sort," responded Stevens. "There's no


stone wall at all. You just wait, and you'll see."

"Sure to do that! For why? 'Cause I can't help it," said


Stuckey. "Nor wouldn't if I could. It's a werry interesting
contemplation."

"What's interesting?"

"Why, this here strike," said Stuckey. "I've come along


here for the werry purpose of examining into your state of
mind, and learnin' how you're all a-looking on the state of
affairs. Once on a time I'd ha' gone along with you all, afore
I got to be more enlightened."

"Oh, you're enlightened, are you?" said Stevens, with


contempt.

"Hope so," Stuckey answered. "Not as I means for to


say that enlightenment o' the understanding goes alongside
of a garden spade more than of a pick. But since I've laid by
the pick and took up the spade, I've learnt to look upon
things in a more reasonable sort of a light, there ain't no
denying."

"Glad to hear it," said Stevens incredulously. "You don't


go the best way to show your sense by talking of a stone
wall."

"Maybe I do, more'n you're aware. Maybe it's an


inwisible stone wall, as none o' you'll see, till heads go bang
agin it. But ye all seem mighty cheerful this evening. Mr.
Hughes 'll ask me by an' by,—"

"'Well, Peter,' he'll say, 'and how's the men getting along
to-night?'" he'll say.

"And I'll tell him, 'Not a bit depressed nor down in the
mouth, sir,' I'll say, 'but all as merry as crickets, thinking o'
the nice long holiday they're a-going to get."

"And he'll say, 'Poor fellows!'"

"Mr. Hughes has been down the road himself, and heard
Pope, so it isn't like he'll go to you for information," retorted
Stevens.

"I've heard him!" said Stuckey, with a nod. "I've heard


Pope! Heard him yesterday a-talking against that 'ere cruel
bloodhound of a master, Mr. Bertie, who's just been setting
up a soup-kitchen for them iron-workers that's got cut off
from work by the action of the strikers. Werry bloodthirsty
deed!"

"I've nothing to say against Mr. Bertie himself," said


Stevens. "We're striking for our rights. 'Tain't because Pope
tells us. It's because we want our rights."

"Never you mind, man," Stuckey responded, in


consoling tones. "When Peter Pope's golden age is come,
and capital is abolished, and masters is all wiped out of
existence, and men don't need to work, and wages comes
pouring in from nobody knows where, ye'll all share and
share alike, I don't doubt. That's something to look forward
to, ain't it? Never you mind a bit o' trouble beforehand.
Some o' ye's pretty sure to struggle through the starwation-
time previous; leastways I hopes so. And if so be ye don't—
why it's only dying for your rights!"
Before he could enter, a hand came on his arm.

With a friendly nod, Stuckey trudged away, leaving


Stevens not greatly cheered by his remarks. Coming so
soon after his wife's complaints, Roger found them
depressing. Almost without thought, he turned his step
towards the nearest public-house; but before he could
enter, a hand came on his arm.
"Now, Stevens—Stevens, man, it's no time for that!"

"No time for what?" demanded Stevens, shaking himself


free.

"You know! Think of the wife and children," urged John.

"And if I do?" asked Stevens surlily.

"Winter's at hand, and not much money like to come to


you yet awhile, I wouldn't now—if I was you. Just think of
the little ones! You haven't even Union funds to depend on."

"I know that well enough—more's the pity!" Stevens


hesitated a moment, then turned short round and walked
away—both from the public-house and from John Holdfast.
So Holdfast's effort had not been quite a failure.

Sarah Holdfast had returned from her kind little visit to


Martha, next door. When her husband reached home, she
had prepared his tea, washed the children, and made
everything spick and span. Holdfast's first move was, as
always, to disappear up-stairs, that he might do away with
the marks of toil before he enjoyed his evening meal. His
next move, on reappearance, was to take the baby in his
strong arms, and to let little Bessie climb upon his knee.
But he seemed a degree absent to-day; not so playful with
the young ones as Mrs. Holdfast was accustomed to see
him.

"Anything wrong, John?" she asked, when tea was


nearly over.

"Well, yes. It can't be helped," said John, trying to


speak cheerfully.

"Work going to stop?"


"Not for a few days—three or four, I suppose. But if
more men go out to-morrow and next day,—if the strike
don't end by then—"

"It won't yet," she said.

"I'm afraid not."

"It won't—yet awhile. The masters and the men's both


equal set on their own way; and neither's ready to give in
one inch to the other. There 'll be a fight first."

John nodded.

"And the works 'll have to stop?"

"Yes. It ain't known certainly yet; but I've had a private


word. Not the only one," muttered John.

A look of fear came into Mrs. Holdfast's eyes. "The


men?" she breathed.

"If I don't go out like the rest, but just stick to work as
long as I can get it, I'm to look to myself, and take the
consequences."

Mrs. Holdfast breathed quickly.

"Don't seem I'm to have much choice soon," said John.


"I'll have to go out then. Only it'll be because I must, not
because I choose. That's all the difference."

"John, wouldn't it be best to go out now? If you'll have


to be paid off in a day or two—"

John gave her a steady look.


"You wouldn't have me act as a craven?" he asked.
"Give in, for fear of consequences!"

"But if they was to hurt you? There's some among 'em


who might do that."

"Then I'd have to bear it."

"Only, wouldn't it be better, just this once—"

"Say the true word, Sarah. Wouldn't it be safer?"

"Well, wouldn't it be safer?" she faltered.

"Safer for my bones, I shouldn't wonder. There's a


cowardly few among 'em, I know, who wouldn't scruple to
knock me down, if they got a chance of doing it,
unbeknown. But I don't mean 'em to have a chance if I can
help it. Come, cheer up," said John. "Things 'll come right in
the end."

Things seemed very wrong to Sarah at this moment.

"Pope says the men strike for their rights," continued


John. "Well, and I'm standing out for my rights. I've my
rights as well as they! Don't you see? If Pope's free to take
his view of the question, I'm free to take my view of it. And
my view don't coincide with Pope's. I've no notion of giving
in to tyranny, whether it's tyranny of men or of masters. If
the lot of them are free to strike, I'm free to not strike."

"That wouldn't be much help to me if you got hurt."

"Hope I shan't be, but any way I've got to do right,"


said John. "I've got to do what seems to me right; and a
strike just now don't seem to me right. It don't seem to me
called for. It don't seem to me likely to bring good. Pope
and others says I'm wrong; and they says I'm bound to do
what they think right. Now I don't nor can't see that. If
Pope's a free and independent Englishman, I'm the same. If
I've got to give in my judgment to Pope, and do what I
count to be wrong, because he says it's right, I wonder
where my freedom is. That's tyranny, and tyranny of the
worst sort, because it tries to hold a man's conscience in
bondage. I'll not give in to it, Sarah. I wasn't named
'Holdfast' for nothing. So long as I live, I'll 'hold fast' to
what is right, so far as I can see what's right."

John spoke quietly, not with a noisy voice or manner;


and his words were all the more impressive from their
quietness. Sarah fully agreed with all he said, as a matter of
principle,—only as his wife she was afraid for him. She
would not argue against his convictions, but her eyes grew
tearful.

"I think we needn't fear," John said more softly. "We


haven't brought ourselves into the difficulty, Sarah, woman.
If we had, it 'ud be different. I think we've got just to go
straight ahead, and do what's right, and put our trust in
God. If it's His will to let me suffer, why, there's some good
reason for it. I'm sure of that."
CHAPTER V.
DUCKED.

SARAH could not shake off the thought of something


happening to John. All the next day, and the next, she lived
in fear, often hard to control. Those evenings he came home
safely untouched. He did not tell Sarah how the men on
strike glowered at him; how he was pursued on his way by
the contemptuous groan of "Blackleg!!"

Many a man would sooner face a knock-down blow than


that sound of scorn; but John was not made of yielding
stuff. He did not tell Sarah all this, for there was no need to
add to her anxiety.

On the third day it became known that the works must


close; so John Holdfast, and those others who had refused
to join the strike, would be reduced to idleness. Some said
this might not be for long, as there was talk of workmen
coming from a distance. Mrs. Holdfast hoped that the
closing of the works would appease the strikers' anger
against her husband; but she did not happen to hear the
report about men arriving from elsewhere, or she would
hardly have been so hopeful.

Her dread had lessened on the third day; and that very
evening John was long coming home. He was far later than
usual. Mrs. Holdfast waited and waited, uneasiness
deepening into terror. She put on her bonnet and shawl at
length, and went out into the dusk to look for John; but she
could see nothing of him, and it was impossible to leave the
children for more than a few minutes.

She went in next door, and found Martha alone.

Stevens had gone somewhere, Martha said—to a


meeting, she thought. "They're always at it with their
speechifying," she said. "Maybe your husband's with them."

"He'd have told me if he meant to go," Mrs. Hold fast


answered.

"Roger don't trouble to tell me," said Martha.

No comfort was to be had there, and Mrs. Holdfast


hastened home; the dread of foul play growing upon her
with sickening force.

Another hour she waited. It had grown quite dark. John


never stayed away like this without previous warning.

Mrs. Holdfast went again next door, in her misery, and


found Stevens just come in. He knew nothing, he said—had
seen nothing, heard nothing. He had not set eyes on
Holdfast that day.

At first he seemed very much disinclined to take any


steps. "Holdfast's got himself into bad odour," he said;
"staying in when the rest went out. He'd better have taken
good advice."

Mrs. Holdfast would not then argue against the view


that to go with the multitude must be the wiser course. She
used all her energies to get him to act, and presently her
entreaties overcame his reluctance. He left the house to
make inquiries, and Sarah went back to her home.
Another long period of wearying suspense, and at
length somebody was coming. Sarah knew what it meant,
directly her ears caught the sound of shuffling footsteps.
She went to the open door, and heard Stevens' voice—

"Come along! Here you are! Just home."

"John!" cried Sarah.

"I've found him. He's had a fall or something," said


Stevens. "Been and tumbled into a pond."

Did Stevens really think so? There was a shamefaced


sound in his voice.

Sarah was by her husband's side, helping to bear him


up, to pull him along. John said nothing. It was as much as
he could do to move at all, with the assistance of them
both.
"Tumbled into the pond! Not he! He's been in;
but it wasn't a tumble."

Once in the kitchen, they could see the state he was in


—dripping wet, half-covered with green slime from the
pond, his face ghastly pale, his right arm hanging
helplessly, blood flowing still from a cut in his forehead.
Stevens got him into a chair, and shut the door, John sat
drooping forward, like one stupefied.

You might also like