Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Maia Manesis Naylor - Drafting Document
Maia Manesis Naylor - Drafting Document
Mr. Smith
G Block
factor, wealth. Whether positively or negatively impacted, the focus around wealth shifted the
character's sights majorly. Marxism, based on the influence different statuses have on people, is
greatly applied to The Great Gatsby, and by discovering the presence of this idea in the novel, it
becomes clear that wealth drives the actions and morals in this society. When watching the film,
the distinction of wealth in society strengthens the importance of this factor. The novel, when
analyzed through a Marxist lens, reveals the destructive effects wealth has on the characters as a
result, Luhrmann’s shot composition further emphasizes the impact wealth has on the character's
lives.
Characters focusing solely on their wealth consequently face detrimental effects to their
character, affecting both their relationships and the novel's plot. When understanding the novel
through a Marxist lens, Tom and Gatsby obtaining great wealth becomes extremely significant,
as Gatsby falls into new money, and Tom has centuries of old money, wealth that goes on to
corrupt their well-being. Both characters tended to exclusively focus on their status being built
up by excessive wealth, in turn, compromising their morals. Daisy, a character in both Tom and
Gatsby's lives, is a symbol of status for both of them, especially in Gatbsy’s eyes. As Gatsby
comes from a different background than Daisy, if he is able to win her over, his wealth would be
proven great enough. In order to do so his character becomes compromised, an indirect effect of
Manesis Naylor 2
having a constant longing for wealth. When it came to Daisy, Gatsby “let her believe that he was
a person from much the same strata as herself”(Fitzgerald 149), attempting to rise to her level of
wealth. Although Gatsby truly cared for Daisy, his motives behind his goals were extremely
influenced by the present idea of wealth because Daisy meant a higher status to Gatsby. As their
focus on wealth changed the character’s actions, their demeanors also began to shift.
Specifically, Nick observed Tom, as “Two shining arrogant eyes had established dominance over
his face”(Fitzgerald 8). The superiority Tom feels he has over the rest of society, from a life of
extensive wealth, is constantly portrayed in his personality. Tom’s superiority complex is a form
of dominance he exerts on others, a destructive effect from centering his life around the old
money he possesses, and the opportunities this extends to him. As these two characters only
focus on their wealth, the well-being of those in relationships around them gets damaged, by
both Tom and Gatsby's carelessness to any subject not pertaining to their status in society.
Ultimately as both characters act as though they are above others, wealth is seen to corrupt their
morals, rather it results in Tom’s diminished proper character, or Gatsby, with a lack of any goals
exterior to wealth.
Luhrmann emphasizes the impact wealth has on The Great Gatsby characters, by
showcasing who obtains wealth through the choices made for shot composition. Throughout
different scenes of the movie, the ability to physically view the differences between the wealthy
and the poor allows for the inferences of those who are negatively affected by their excessive
wealth. The details put into each shot, including color, and exaggeration, differentiate those
depicted as superior, from others less fortunate. Scenes of the wealthy show much more
excitement and liveliness in their lives, compared to the dreariness of the poor, much more
boring. By showing the impacts of wealth through these different ways of filming, Luhrmann
Manesis Naylor 3
makes it evident how large of a role wealth is. When Nick first introduces the valley of ashes in
the movie, a gray-toned color scheme is used with a lack of excitement in the shots. The
“grotesque place” that the valley of ashes is said to be, is filled with the workers from the bottom
of society. Therefore, displaying this area in a rather depressing and lifeless manner leads to the
viewers further understanding of the lack of wealth present in the valley of ashes. The scenes
where Nick describes his experiences in the Valley of Ashes are a stark contrast to a party scene
at Gatsby's house. The wild filming of the scene portrays Gatsby's life in a specific way to
showcase its extravagance, a characteristic of the wealthy. With a vibrant color scheme utilized
for the party scene, Gatsby's prosperity and wealth almost seem to seep off the screen. Luhrmann
chose to highlight specific scenes depicting wealth with brighter and busier shots. Evidently,
these shots fall in either Gatsby’s or Tom’s presence, showcasing their wealth compared to the
rest of society. By understanding how the changes in shot composition reveal that status
The shot composition in the Great Gatsby movies leads the viewers to the realization of
different wealth statuses each character obtains, and once visually understood it becomes easier
to examine which characters had acquired wealth and were detrimentally impacted by it. The
details provided in both the book and movie, for a specific scene, complement each other by
allowing the reader to identify the wealthy using imagery in the movie, and then examine the
effects wealth has taken on the character, after reading the book through a Marxist lens. The
negative effects wealth has is a common theme in the novel, developing as soon as Nick finally
meets Gatsby during the party, Gatsby says “You see, I’m Gatsby”(Luhrmann) right as fireworks
go off and the camera pans out to show the incredible scene of Gatsby’s. By emphasizing
Gatsby's wealth with dramatic composition from the beginning of his introduction, the
Manesis Naylor 4
reader/viewer can begin to understand the direct correlation Gatsby has with wealth and how
much it influences him. The collaboration between how Gatsby's introduction is seen in the
movie and how Gatsby is affected by wealth in the book is a specific example of the emphasis
the movie has on the book, especially when analyzing both through a Marxist lens. Similarly,
Tom's wealth-impacted character shows its true colors in his discriminatory remarks against
Gatsby. As Tom is leaving Gatsby's party, and the shots in the movie show less commotion and
prosperity, it can be inferred that Tom is being corrupted by his high status. Tom’s questioning of
Gatbsy’s legitness, claiming “A lot of these newly rich people are just big
bootleggers”(Fitzgerald 106), shows how as his focus is only on wealth, he begins to ruin
relationships with people through developing an awful character. The movie highlights this shift
with a paralleling shift in shot composition, a common occurrence throughout the movie. The
wealth corrupts people as seen in Marxist interpretation of the book and in the movie we can
furthermore see who obtains wealth to emphasize that it affects these people
After analyzing the great gatsby through Marxist lens, and noticing the specific elements
to certain shots in the movie, the negative effects of the excessive focus on wealth in society
become clear. Throughout the novel, these negative effects are shown by alterations of their
moral characteristics, a direct effect of a life revolving around wealth. To highlight the
extravagance these wealthy people possess (a factor leading to their superiority complexes), the
shots of the wealthy are very vibrant and exuberant. Furthermore, watching and reading the same
scene further develops the marxist views of the novel, especially as the interactions in the book
are easily imagined with the help of the movie. When analyzing a novel through a specific lens,
it is very helpful to dissect a quality of the book's film, as the filming qualities tend to collaborate
Works cited