Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Machine Intelligence and Data Science Applications Proceedings of MIDAS 2022 1st Edition Amar Ramdane-Cherif (Editor)
Machine Intelligence and Data Science Applications Proceedings of MIDAS 2022 1st Edition Amar Ramdane-Cherif (Editor)
https://ebookmeta.com/product/machine-intelligence-and-data-
science-applications-proceedings-of-midas-2021-skala-vaclav/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/computational-intelligence-and-
data-analytics-proceedings-of-iccida-2022-rajkumar-buyya/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/data-science-and-security-
proceedings-of-idscs-2022-1st-edition-samiksha-shukla-editor/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/applications-of-artificial-
intelligence-and-machine-learning-select-proceedings-of-
icaaaiml-2020-1st-edition-ankur-choudhary/
Machine Learning and Data Science: Fundamentals and
Applications 1st Edition Prateek Agrawal (Editor)
https://ebookmeta.com/product/machine-learning-and-data-science-
fundamentals-and-applications-1st-edition-prateek-agrawal-editor/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/data-science%e2%80%95analytics-and-
applications-proceedings-of-the-5th-international-data-science-
conference-idsc2023-1st-edition-peter-haber/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/machine-learning-and-artificial-
intelligence-with-industrial-applications-from-big-data-to-small-
data-1st-edition-diego-carou/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/statistics-with-julia-fundamentals-
for-data-science-machine-learning-and-artificial-
intelligence-1st-edition-yoni-nazarathy-2/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/statistics-with-julia-fundamentals-
for-data-science-machine-learning-and-artificial-
intelligence-1st-edition-yoni-nazarathy/
Algorithms for Intelligent Systems
Series Editors
Jagdish Chand Bansal
Department of Mathematics, South Asian University, New Delhi, Delhi,
India
Kusum Deep
Department of Mathematics, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee,
Roorkee, Uttarakhand, India
Atulya K. Nagar
School of Mathematics, Computer Science and Engineering, Liverpool
Hope University, Liverpool, UK
Indexed by zbMATH.
T. P. Singh
School of Computer Science Engineering and Technology, Bennett
University, Greater Noida, India
Informatics Cluster, School of Computer Sciences, University of
Petroleum and Energy Studies (UPES), Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India
Ravi Tomar
Senior Architect, Persistent Systems, Pune, India
Tanupriya Choudhury
CSE Department, Symbiosis Institute of Technology, Symbiosis
International University, Pune, Maharashtra, India
Informatics Cluster, School of Computer Science, University of
Petroleum and Energy Studies (UPES), Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India
CSE Department, Daffodil International University, Daffodil Smart City,
Bangladesh
Director Research (Honorary), The AI University, Cutbank Montana, US
Jung-Sup Um
Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea (Republic of)
The publisher, the authors, and the editors are safe to assume that the
advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate
at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the
editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the
material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have
been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional
claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rahul Gupta
Email: rgupta10@amity.edu
1 Introduction
Supply chain practices in Industry 4.0 are equipped with various
emerging and novel technologies [41]. These technologies support
organizations with enhanced business processes, financial results, and
higher customer satisfaction. All this is possible to be achieved through
seamless coordination and augmenting the value chain across the
supply chain, which is inclusive of the back end from suppliers,
manufacturers, financiers, and regulators, and at the front end by
logistics support providers and retailers. Due to the complexity of
multi-echelon, multination supply chains, disruptions and uncertainty
have amplified with increased costs and decreased revenues. Further,
these disruptions get exacerbated by the availability of non-trusted and
untimely data. Agility, Resiliency, and Transparency are a result of the
smooth functioning of supply chains.
Rayome (2019) [32] suggested that numerous emerging computing
technologies such as IoT, AI, 5G networks, Robotics, 3D printing,
Biometric recognitions, Drones, and AR/VR are process enablers for
Industry 4.0. Blockchain and wireless communication devices are
emerging recently, are well-positioned, and are accepted for pioneering
successful business models. Integration of Blockchain technology in
supply chain operations offers transparency, trust, and consensus
among stakeholders and offers flexibility in operations. Tomar et al.
(2020) [36] show how Blockchain is effective in building security and
trust in its application. Enterprises across geographies are experiencing
an acceleration in the speed of transactions, which can be managed by
using reusable technologies, software, algorithms, and governance
models.
Nowinski and Kozma (2017) [29] commented that, in changing
business scenarios, the onus of trust has shifted from individuals to
smart contracts, analytics, and sharing applications bypassing the need
for a central entity. Scholars and business organizations have
acknowledged the contribution of technological advancements.
However, how to address sustainability is an issue that still needs
comprehensive discussion and deliberations.
Technology implementation has detrimental consequences,
depending upon transportation to agribusiness and manufacturing
organizations. Some treatments are imposed on the natural ecosystem.
The understanding of complexities among society, technology, and
business needs to be identified and addressed, to attain sustainability
challenges. The study focuses on technological contribution in meeting
challenges sustainably. The degree of the adverse environmental impact
of these technologies may be mitigated by new sustainable
opportunities. Stock and Seliger (2016) [33] found a lack of research to
understand the impact of technologies in Industry 4.0 on resolving
sustainability issues and industrial symbiosis. The study focuses on the
opportunities offered by blockchain technology and Industry 4.0 in
managing sustainable relationships.
2 Background
The study reviews the literature on the impact of Blockchain
technology on the sustainability of Industry 4.0 and supply chain and
discusses a brief review of Blockchain, Industry 4.0, and sustainable
development. To study the impact of blockchain on the sustainability of
the Industry 4.0, supply chain, a brief of these concepts is studied here.
2.1 Blockchain
A distributed ledger shares data on the peer-to-peer network. The
nodes, being members, validate and communicate through a predefined
protocol. These ledgers can be centralized, offering explicit rights to an
individual user, or decentralized offering identical rights. Every node in
the distributed ledger has a copy of the ledger. A decentralized or
centralized ledger of the blockchain can be designed as per the rights of
the users. In the case of decentralized blockchain, decision-making is
shared by various users, while in the case of centralized blockchain, a
single entity has the responsibility to make decisions.
A cryptocurrency called Bitcoin gets popularized due to peer-to-
peer networks. Cryptography helps in creating a blockchain in each
block data file, transactions have a cryptographic hash that is linked
with the previous block. Casado et al. (2018) [6] said that a block is
verified with the percentage of network nodes, gets added to form a
blockchain, and is called a public ledger transaction.
Blockchain supports digital administrative control, sharing, and
storing of data by converting it into code transparency and mitigating
revision or deletion risk. The potential of blockchain supports all digital
payments, agreements, and transactions. Upon validation, these records
are shared among machines, persons, algorithms, and firms. Lansiti and
Lakhani (2017) [21] said lawyers, bankers, and brokers need this less
often. Intermediaries act as middlemen for verification and accurately
handling data in various industries. Individuals and organizations are
trusting computer codes for transaction verification over humans.
Bitcoins are in full control of individuals, the Bitcoin balance is
invisible unlike a normal bank balance, which cannot be
viewed/manipulated digitally. Athey et al. (2016) [2] said with proper
passcodes one may authorize entry on a ledger and transaction to
another individual's address. Sharma et al. (2017) [24], and Crosby et
al. (2016) [3], said blockchain transaction benefits include low risk,
transparency, instantaneous, security, private, and no exchange cost.
Barton (2018) [4] discussed the following capabilities depending on
the platform to be used for transactions.
b. Behavior to be rewarded.
c. Terms to be included.
d. Amount of incentive.
5 Discussion
Being in its early stage, its full potential is yet to be achieved after
overcoming its limitations. Scalability should be addressed by limiting
the number of users and size. Computational efficiency helps in
achieving higher security and privacy. Blockchain’s human and social
dimensions need better understanding. Research adequately does not
support various principles and concepts in the blockchain.
Sustainability objectives can be studied as follows.
1. Data-driven decision-making.
References
1. Andoni M, Robu V, Flynn D, Abram S, Geach D, Jenkins D, McCallum P, Peacock A
(2019) Blockchain technology in the energy sector: a systematic review of
challenges and opportunities. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 100:143–174
[Crossref]
2.
Athey S, Parashkevov I, Sarukkai V, Xia J (2016) Bitcoin pricing, adoption, and
usages: theory and evidence
3.
Crosby M, Pattanayak P, Verma S, Kalyanaraman V (2016). Blockchain
technology: beyond Bitcoin. Appl Innov 2:6–10
4.
Barton D (2018) The future of finance: how FinTech, AI & blockchain will shape
our future. IBM Watson
5.
Barber S, Boyen X, Shi E, Uzun E (2012) Bitter to better—how to make Bitcoin a
better currency. In: International conference on financial cryptography and data
security. Springer, pp 399–414
6.
Casado-Vara R, Prieto J, De la Prieta F, Corchado JM (2018) How Blockchain
improves the supply chain: case study alimentary supply chain. Procedia Comput
Sci 134:393–398
[Crossref]
7.
Catalini C, Gans JS (2016). Some simple economics of the blockchain. National
bureau of economic research
8.
Catalini C, Gans JS (2018) Initial coin offerings and the value of crypto tokens.
National bureau of economic research
9.
Catalini C, Gans J (2019) Some simple economics of the blockchain. Rotman Sch.
Manag. Working paper No. 2874598 MIT Sloan Res. Pap. No. 5191-16
10.
Conoscenti M, Vetro A, De Martin JC (2016) Blockchain for the internet of things:
a systematic literature review. In: 2016 IEEE/ACS 13th international conference
of computer systems and applications (AICCSA). IEEE, pp 1–6
11.
De Bruyn S, Ahdour S, Bijleveld M, de Graaff L, Schep E, Schroten A, Vergeer R
(2018) Environmental prices handbook 2017: methods and numbers for
valuation of environmental impacts. CE Delft, Delft
12.
Sharma A, Sarishma TR, Chilamkurti N, Kim B-G (2020) Blockchain based smart
contracts for internet of medical things in e-healthcare. Electronics 9:1609.
https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9101609
13.
Gaurav B, Olson R, Pathak S, Santhanam N, Soundararajan H (2019) Blockchain
2.0: what’s in store for the two ends—semiconductors (suppliers) and industrials
(consumers)?
14.
Ghisellini P, Cialani C, Ulgiati S (2016) A review on circular economy: the
expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic
systems. J Clean Rod 114:11–32
[Crossref]
15.
Greening LA, Greene DL, Difiglio C (2000) Energy efficiency and consumption—
the rebound effect—a survey. Energy Policy 28(6–7):389–401
[Crossref]
16.
Hawken P, Lovins AB, Lovins LH (2013) Natural capitalism: the next industrial
revolution. Routledge
[Crossref]
17.
Hackius N, Petersen M (2017) Blockchain in logistics and supply chain: trick or
treat? In: Proceedings of the hamburg international conference of logistics
(HICL). E-publication, pp 3–18
18.
Kagermann H (2015) Change through digitization—value creation in the age of
industry 4.0. management of permanent change. Springer, pp 23–45
19.
Guo J, Cengiz K, Tomar R (2021) An IOT and blockchain approach for food
traceability system in agriculture. Scalable Comput Pract Exp 22:127–137
20.
Krause MJ, Tolaymat T (2018) Quantification of energy and carbon costs for
mining cryptocurrencies. Nat Sustain 1(11):711
[Crossref]
21.
Lansiti M, Lakhani K (2017) The truth about Blockchain. Harv Bus Rev
22.
Lasi H, Fettke P, Kemper H-G, Feld T, Hoffmann M (2014) Industry 4.0. Bus Inf
Syst Eng 6(4):239–242
23.
Li J, Mann W (2018) Initial coin offering and platform building
24.
Sharma PK, Moon SY, Park JH (2017) Block-VN: a distributed Blockchain based
vehicular network architecture in smart city. J Inf Process Syst 13(1):84
25.
Sille R et al (2022) Review study on blockchain frameworks for security issues
in IoT devices. In: 2022 international symposium on multidisciplinary studies
and innovative technologies (ISMSIT), Ankara, Turkey, 2022, pp 876–881.
https://doi.org/10.1109/I SMSIT56059.2022.9932744
26.
Mattila J, Seppala T, Holmströ m J (2016) Product-centric information
management: a case study of a shared platform with blockchain technology
27.
Mora C, Rollins RL, Taladay K, Kantar MB, Chock MK, Shimada M, Franklin EC
(2018) Bitcoin emissions alone could push global warming above 2 C. Nat Clim
Chang 8(11):931
[Crossref]
28.
Narayanan A (2015) ‘Private blockchain’ is just a confusing name for a shared
database. https://freedom-to-tinker.c om/2015/09/18/private-blockchainis-just-
a-confusing-name-for-a-shared-database/
29.
Nowinski W, Kozma M (2017) How can Blockchain technology disrupt the
existing business models? Entrep Bus Econ Rev 5(3):173–188
30.
Pearce DW, Turner RK (1990) Economics of natural resources and the
environment. JHU Press
31.
Prendeville S, Cherim E, Bocken N (2017) Circular cities: mapping six cities in
transition. Environ Innov Soc Transitions
32.
Choudhury T, Khanna A, Toe TT, Khurana M, Nhu NG (2021) Blockchain
applications in IoT ecosystem. Springer, Cham, Switzerland
[Crossref]
33.
Rayome AD (2019) Top 10 emerging technologies of 2019. TechRepublic
34.
Stock T, Seliger G (2016) Opportunities of sustainable manufacturing in Industry
4.0. Procedia Cirp 40:536–541
[Crossref]
35.
Saberi S, Kouhizadeh M, Sarkis J, Shen L (2018) Blockchain technology and its
relationships to sustainable supply chain management. Int J Prod Res 1–19
36.
Sadouskaya K (2017) Adoption of blockchain technology in supply chain and
logistics
37.
Tomar R (2020) Maintaining trust in VANETs using blockchain. ACM SIGAda Ada
Lett 40:91–96
[Crossref]
38.
Stoll C, Klaaßen L, Gallersdö rfer U (2018) The carbon footprint of Bitcoin
39.
Konstantopoulos G (2018) Understanding blockchain fundamentals, part 3:
delegated proof of stake. https://medium.c om/loom-network/understanding-
blockchain-fundamentals-part-3-delegated-proof-of-stakeb385a6b92ef
40.
Sun J, Yan J, Zhang KZK (2016) Blockchain-based sharing services: what
blockchain technology can contribute to smart cities. Financ Innov 2(1):26
41.
Tushar W, Saha TK, Yuen C, Smith D, Poor HV (2020) Peer-to-peer trading in
electricity networks: an overview. IEEE Trans Smart Grid
42.
Vogel-Heuser B, Hess D (2016) Guest editorial industry 4.0–prerequisites and
visions. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng 13(2):411–413
43.
Von Haller Gronbaek M (2016) Blockchain 2.0, smart contracts and challenges.
Comput Law SCL Mag 1–5
44.
Negi D, Sah A, Rawat S, Choudhury T, Khanna A (2021) Block chain platforms and
smart contracts. In: Choudhury T, Khanna A, Toe TT, Khurana M, Gia Nhu N (eds)
Blockchain applications in IoT ecosystem. EAI/Springer innovations in
communication and computing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-
030-65691-1_5
45.
Yadav S, Singh SP (2020) Blockchain critical success factors for sustainable
supply chain. Resour Conserv Recycl 152:104505
[Crossref]
46.
Yli-Huumo J, Ko D, Choi S, Park S, Smolander K (2016) Where is current research
on Blockchain technology? —a systematic review. PLoS ONE 11(10):e0163477
[Crossref]
47.
Kane E (2017) Is blockchain a general-purpose technology?
48.
Zhou K, Liu T, Zhou L (2015) Industry 4.0: towards future industrial
opportunities and challenges. In: 2015 12th international conference on fuzzy
systems and knowledge discovery (FSKD). IEEE, pp 2147–2152
49.
Weidema BP (2015) Comparing three life cycle impact assessment methods from
an endpoint perspective. J Ind Ecol 19(1):20–26
[Crossref]
50.
Smart Log (2017) Smart log - proof of concept project for IoT blockchain
solution in logistics industry. https://www.kinno.fi/en/smartlog
51.
Rabe M, Jäkel, F-W, Weinaug, H (2006) Supply chair demonstrator based on
federated models and HLA application. SimVi 329–338
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2023
A. Ramdane-Cherif et al. (eds.), Machine Intelligence and Data Science Applications,
Algorithms for Intelligent Systems
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-1620-7_2
Poorvi Prakash
Email: poorvi.prakash@mba.christuniversity.in
1 Introduction
In terms of revenue and employment, India’s healthcare sector has
grown to become one of the country’s most important industries. The
healthcare sector includes hospitals, medical devices, clinical trials,
outsourcing, telemedicine, medical tourism, health insurance, and
medical equipment. Because of expanded coverage, services, and
increasing spending by both public and private entities, the Indian
healthcare system is quickly expanding. India’s competitive advantage
is its large pool of well-trained medical workers. India is cost
competitive when compared to its Asian and Western peers. In India,
surgery costs around a tenth of what it does in the United States or
Western Europe. The healthcare market might triple in size by 2022,
reaching Rs. 8.6 trillion (US$ 133.44 billion). In Budget 2021, India’s
public expenditure on healthcare as a percentage of GDP was 1.2%. In
FY21, gross direct premium income for health insurance companies
increased 13.3% year on year to Rs. 58, 572.46 crore (US$ 7.9 billion).
The health industry accounts for 29.5% of the country’s total gross
written premiums. The Indian healthcare market is tremendously
diverse, with opportunities for providers, payers, and medical
technology in every category. As the rivalry intensifies, businesses are
looking for the latest dynamics and trends that may benefit their firm.
From Rs. 4 trillion (US$ 61.79 billion) in FY17 to Rs. 8.6 trillion (US$
132.84 billion) in FY22, India’s hospital business is predicted to
increase at a CAGR of 16–17%. India’s government plans to increase
public health spending to 2.5% of GDP by 2025.
2 Literature Review
To understand more about the paper and to know what methods and
algorithms can be used, various research papers were downloaded
from various websites and used as a reference. These papers help to
understand the significance of the project and to know about the
various methods that can be used and various algorithms that can be
implemented. The scientific evidence presented in this review article
demonstrates that climatic variables such as temperature and humidity
may influence the spread of the 2019 COVID virus. Warm and humid
conditions, it appears, may signal decreased transmission of COVID-19.
Considering the topic, which appears to impose both positive and
negative data on the likely effect of environmental conditions,
particularly humidity and temperature, on the stability and
transmissibility of the 2019-COVID, nearly all available information
suggested a possible positive effect [1]. By utilizing a semantics-based
probabilistic framework to analyze the causal relationship and effects
of climate variability on the COVID-19 outbreak, the framework
becomes more effective in capturing the unique characteristics of the
pandemic. More importantly, the effect analysis framework includes an
auxiliary module for quantifying semantic relatedness on a regional
basis, allowing for the realistic accounting of multiple climate types
within a single spatial region [2].
In Colombian cities like Barranquilla, Bogota, Cali, Cartagena,
Leticia, and Medellin, mobility variables had the greatest impact on
virus transmission, particularly in the post-quarantine period. In
different biogeographical locations, the weather variables have varying
effects on virus transmission. One of the characteristics linked to the
greatest contamination rate in Leticia was wind speed. In Bogota,
where cold/dry conditions prevailed, the largest number of new daily
cases were observed [3]. In LAC region, humidity, wind speed, and
rainfall indicated a significant association with daily cases, total cases,
and death. The results indicate that the spreading of COVID-19 positive
and negative was associated with wealth disparity and poverty levels in
the cities studied [4].
In the Brazilian state of Rio de Janeiro, the spread of SARS-COVID
was found to have a substantial negative connection with solar
exposure. There was a negative link between temperature and wind
speed. As a result, excessive solar radiation can be identified as the
principal climatic factor suppressing COVID-19 spread in the examined
tropical condition. High temperatures and high wind speeds are also
important factors to consider [5]. In five Brazilian cities (Sao Paulo, Rio
de Janeiro, Brasilia, Manaus, and Fortaleza), based on data from April
13, in contrast to reports from the coldest nations or periods under
freezing temperatures, the results revealed that greater mean
temperatures and average relative humidity enhanced COVID-19
transmission [6].
COVID-19 data and daily average temperature and relative humidity
have a significant positive and negative connection, respectively, in the
regions of Indonesia. The correlation coefficients, on the other hand,
are low. This relationship was repeatedly confirmed by regression
analysis [7]. Several climatic variables as well as ambient air pollution
were linked to the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in 3739 locations
around the world. It is discovered that there is a moderately negative
relationship between estimated reproduction number and
temperatures above 25 °C (a decrease of 37% [95% CI 1–54] per
additional degree), a U-shaped relationship with outdoor ultraviolet
exposure, and weaker positive associations with air pressure, wind
speed, precipitation, diurnal temperature, sulphur dioxide, and ozone
[8]. The impact of physicochemical variables on virus vitality and
spread should be considered in experimental and clinical studies.
Another avenue to explore is the effect of diet and its interaction with
the immune system on SARS-CoV-2 infection and mortality rate. Over
the last year, numerous studies have been conducted on both the virus
and pathophysiology of COVID-19, as well as the cellular mechanisms
underlying the spread of the virus. The result of the study shows that
airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 is especially crucial under dry
conditions and high temperature, and it needs to be considered more.
Cold weather and high humidity can increase the likelihood of surface
transmission as an important factor in spreading the COVID-19
outbreak. Hydrophobic surfaces can enable the virus to remain in
droplet form for more extended periods, potentially facilitating its
spread. In these circumstances, social distancing measures may be
beneficial [9]. To assess the potential link between weather patterns
and COVID-19 fatality rates in the United States. The primary factors
include minimum and maximum daily temperature, ozone
concentration, PM2.5 concentrations, precipitation, and UV radiation
index. The result observed in the research is that the fatality rate
increased when the temperature is minimum and the ozone level is
negatively correlated with the deaths when the level is below 38 ppb
[10]. According to previous research, high temperatures and humidity
limit the transmission of the severe acute respiratory syndrome
coronavirus 2 (SARSCoV-2).
As a result, the purpose of this study work is to examine the effects
of temperature, precipitation, and ultraviolet (UV) light on community
transmission of SARS-CoV-2 using case data from the United States.
Negative binomial regression modeling was employed to determine
whether daily maximum temperature, precipitation, and UV index
correlate with COVID-19 fatality rates. The number of infected cases
decreases as the temperature rises to 52°F, and it is lower at warmer
temperatures than at cooler temperatures. Temperature and
transmission, on the other hand, have a minor relationship, and
transmission is likely to remain high at warmer temperatures [11]. This
study aimed to build a model to forecast the number of COVID-19 cases
in the upcoming 14 days in three different provinces in Indonesia and
to analyze the relationship between COVID-19 cases and
meteorological variables. The method used to build a model to forecast
is Autoregressive Moving Average (ARIMA) model. The Spearman
correlation analysis analyzes the relationship between B.1.1.7 cases
and meteorological variables such as sunshine, humidity, rainfall,
maximum and minimum temperature, and wind speed. The study’s
findings revealed that the fitted ARIMA models predicted an increase in
daily instances in three provinces. In comparison to actual cases, total
cases in the three provinces will increase by 36% (West Java), 13.5%
(South Sumatra), and 30% (East Kalimantan) until the end of 14 days.
The significant contributors to B.1.1.7 cases were temperature, rainfall,
and sunshine [12].
3 Methodology
Research methodology refers to the design of a study technique as well
as the procedures for gathering data for a research study. It outlines the
procedures for acquiring, measuring, and analyzing data in order to
achieve the objectives of a research project. The research approach is
critical in a research endeavor since it outlines the study strategy. The
operational definitions of the concepts used in the research, as well as
the parameters that have been included in the study, are defined
explicitly in this chapter. The goal of this paper is to provide an
overview of the study in terms of the research area, study components,
and population. The organization and design of the questionnaire, as
well as data collection and analysis procedures, are also discussed in
the paper.
3.2 Methodology
The methodology used for this paper is the CRISP-DM methodology.
The Cross Industry Standard Process for Data Mining (CRISP-DM)
methodology consists of six phases, which explain the life cycle of data
analytics.
The six phases of CRISP-DM are:
Business understanding
Data understanding
Data preparation
Data modeling/ analysis Data evaluation
Data visualization
– Business understanding: The first phase of the cycle is business
understanding, which entails comprehending the project’s problem
statement and goal. The goal of this experiment is to see if
environmental factors like weather and air pollution play a role in
the rise of COVID-19 cases in India. This study aims to determine
whether weather parameters including temperature, rainfall, dew,
humidity, wind, and precipitation play a role in the spread or rise of
COVID-19 cases.
– Data understanding: Understanding the data is the second phase of
the cycle. Knowing which dataset to collect and comprehending the
data are both part of this phase. For this study, two datasets were
compiled and combined. Weather is the first dataset, and COVID-19
cases are the second. The information was gathered between April
27, 2020 and September 9, 2021.
– Data preparation: Data preparation, which includes data
transformation, aggregation, and other data pre-processing, is the
most important and time-consuming stage in this process. Cleaning
data and filling in missing numbers, as well as data processing, are
all part of this process.
– Data modeling/Analysis: The fourth step is data modeling and
analysis, which entails analyzing the paper’s domain in order to
select the best and most relevant modeling method for the data. The
correlation of each variable is discovered using the Spearman rank
correlation method after the EDA for the dataset is completed. This
aids in the discovery of major factors influencing daily COVID-19
cases in India. After that, using the ARIMA model, the significant
variables are used to develop a predictive model to forecast the daily
cases.
– Data Evaluation: This procedure entails assessing all of the models
that have been prepared and selecting the best model to deploy. The
ARIMA model was the sole one employed in this study to create a
predictive model for daily COVID-19 cases forecasting.
– Data visualization: Data visualization is the final step in this cycle.
The data is represented in this phase to represent each data in a
dashboard, and the results are then analyzed to see if the model is
performing properly or not.
ETAM, The Judg. xv. 8 Beit ʾAtâb (?)* 14 The rocky top on
Rock which Beit ʾAtâb
stands, west of
Bethlehem.
(Mem. III. 83;
Sh. XVII.)—
Conder.
ETHAM Exod. xiii. Not identified — One of the
20; Num. stations of the
xxxiii. 6 Israelites ‘on the
edge of the
wilderness.’
ETHER Josh. xv. Kh. el ʾAtr (?)* 10 Probably the ruin
42; xix. 7; el ʾAtr, near Beit
1 Chr. iv. Jibrin, allotted to
32 Simeon. (Mem.
III. 261; Sh. XX.)
—Conder.
ETHIOPIA Gen. ii. 13; — Named ‘Cush’ by
2 Kings the Hebrews,
xix. 9; and ‘Aithiopia’ by
Esth. i. 1; the Greeks.
viii. 9; Job Æthiopia
xxviii. 19; embraced
Ps. lxviii. Nubia, Sennaar,
31; lxxxvii. Kordofan, and
4; Isa. Northern
xviii. 1; xx. Abyssinia. The
3, 5; name Cush,
xxxvii. 9; however, in
xliii. 3; xlv. some cases, if
14; Ezek. not in all, applies
xxix. 10; to part of
xxx. 4, 5; Western Asia
xxxviii. 5; south of the
Nah. iii. 9; Caspian—the
Zeph. iii. country of the
10; 1 Esd. Kassi or
iii. 2; Cosseans.
Judith i.
10; Esth.
xiii. 1; xvi.
1; Acts viii.
27
EUPHRATES, Gen. ii. 14; —
River xv. 18;
Deut. i. 7;
xi. 24;
Josh. i. 4;
2 Sam.
viii. 3; 2
Kings xxiii.
29; xxiv. 7;
1 Chr. v. 9;
xviii. 3; 2
Chr. xxxv.
20; Jer.
xiii. 4–7;
xlvi. 2, 6,
10; li. 63;
1 Esd. i.
25, 27; 2
Esd. xiii.
43; Judith
i. 6; ii. 24;
Eccles.
xxiv. 26; 1
Macc. iii.
32, 37
EZEL, Stone 1 Sam. xx. Not identified — A ‘stone’ or
of, 19 ‘mound,’ the
or (R.V., margin, scene of David
Mound of) and Jonathan’s
parting.
EZEM 1 Chr. iv. 29 — See Azem.
EZION-GABER Num. xxxiii. Not identified — The last camping
or GEBER 35, 36; station of the
Deut. ii. 8; Israelites before
1 Kings ix. entering the
26; xxii. wilderness of
48; 2 Chr. Zin, which is
viii. 17; xx. Kadesh. ‘King
36 Solomon made a
navy of ships in
Ezion-geber,
which is beside
Eloth, on the
shore of the Red
Sea, in the land
of Edom’ (1
Kings ix. 25). In
the
neighbourhood
of ʾAkabah.
GAASH, Mount Josh. xxiv. Not identified — In ‘Mount
of 30; Judg. Ephraim,’ near
(R.V. Mountain ii. 9; 2 ‘Timnath-serah.’
of) Sam. xxiii. In Samuel and
30; 1 Chr. Chronicles
xi. 32 rendered
‘Brooks of
Gaash.’