Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

Overview

Historical Simulation VaR Method utilizes historical time series of market prices to obtain a distribution of historical
returns. It evaluates current portfolio(s) across a set of historical price changes, to yield a distribution of changes. In
portfolio MtM value, it can obtain the value at a percentile (for example: VaR), under the assumption that the
historical price changes is a good forecast (for the range of changes the portfolio could have in the future). This
approach computes a VaR at the chosen confidence level. As a consequence, the correlations between the
individual risk factors are already taken into account.

Two main steps should be taken for calculating historical VaR:

1. The first step valuates all instruments using MtM methodologies to represent the current known value of the
portfolio.
2. The second step estimates the future potential range of the MtM value at the future VaR horizon. This
represents the distribution of unknown future value of the portfolio (as illustrated in Figure 1).

The basic steps in Entrade Historical Simulation VaR calculation are as below:

1. Set VaR calculation parameters including: number of historical days, time horizon, confidence level, and
analysis date. A sample decaying factor can also be defined to use sample decaying feature.

2. Select Portfolio(s) to be analyzed.


3. Obtain all underlying trade position and risk factors in the portfolio(s).
4. Compute current MtM value of all trades on the analysis date.
5. Compute day-by-day price changes for each historical day starting from the analysis date as:
6. Calculate simulated prices for each iteration as:

where S0 is the price at the analysis day and Si is ith simulated price at time horizon.

7. Revaluate the portfolio at time horizon for each iteration using the simulated prices.

8. Calculate the portfolio profit and loss (P/L) for the iteration (i.e. the difference between the current market
value of the portfolio and the simulated portfolio value at time horizon).

9. If the sample decaying factor is not set to 0> <1, i.e. not using sample decaying, a percentile number N
of confidence is calculated as below:

N= +1

Next, sort the PnLs calculated in step 8 in ascending order to give simulated P/L distribution for the portfolio as
Figure 3:

Then VaR is the PnL at the percentile N.

10. If the sample decaying lamba is selected, the BRW (Boudoukh, Richardson, Whitelaw) sample decaying
method will be used to exponentially decaying samples. This approach assigns exponential weight to each
historical sample. It combines the strength of EWMA (Exponentially Weighted Moving Average) and historical
simulation.

The sample weight for each historical day is calculated as below:

Where wi is ith sample weight from the analysis date and is the decaying factor. Figure 4 below illustrated

weighting factors of 81 days with = 0.96.


Next, sort the PnLs calculated in step 8 in ascending order to give simulated P/L distribution for the portfolio as
Figure 3. Then the normalized cumulative weights of the sorted PnLs will be calculated.

Then, VaR is calculated using linear interpolation from the 2 PnLs which Normalized Cumulative Weights are right
above and under the confidence level.

11. Draw PnL Histogram to illustrate PnL distribution as Figure 5.


® 2021 Enuit LLC. All rights reserved.
Send feedback on this topic to Enuit LLC.

You might also like