Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Plastic Within: Microplastics Invading Human Organs and Bodily Fluids Systems
The Plastic Within: Microplastics Invading Human Organs and Bodily Fluids Systems
Review
Christian Ebere Enyoh, Arti Devi, Hirofumi Kadono, Qingyue Wang and Mominul Haque Rabin
Special Issue
Plastic Contamination: Challenges and Solutions Volume II
Edited by
Dr. Teresa A. P. Rocha-Santos and Dr. Ana Luísa Patrício da Silva
https://doi.org/10.3390/environments10110194
environments
Review
The Plastic Within: Microplastics Invading Human Organs and
Bodily Fluids Systems
Christian Ebere Enyoh 1, * , Arti Devi 1 , Hirofumi Kadono 1 , Qingyue Wang 1 and Mominul Haque Rabin 1,2
1 Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Saitama University, 255 Shimo-Okubo, Sakura-ku,
Saitama City 338-8570, Japan; devi.a.542@ms.saitama-u.ac.jp (A.D.); kadono@mail.saitama-u.ac.jp (H.K.);
seiyo@mail.saitama-u.ac.jp (Q.W.); rabinagch@sau.edu.bd (M.H.R.)
2 Department of Agricultural Chemistry, Faculty of Agriculture, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University,
Dhaka 1207, Bangladesh
* Correspondence: cenyoh@gmail.com
Abstract: Microplastics (MPs), small plastic particles resulting from the degradation of larger plastic
items and from primary sources such as textiles, engineered plastic pellets, etc., have become a
ubiquitous environmental pollutant. As their prevalence in the natural environment grows, concerns
about their potential impacts on human health have escalated. This review discusses current research
findings on the presence of MPs in organs such as the liver, blood, heart, placenta, breast milk, sputum,
semen, testis, and urine, while also exploring plausible mechanisms of translocation. Furthermore,
the review emphasizes the importance of understanding the potential toxicological effects of MPs
on various physiological processes within these organs and their broader implications for human
health. This review also examines the pathways through which MPs can enter and accumulate in
human organs and bodily fluids, shedding light on the intricate routes of exposure and potential
health implications. It is worth noting that the invasive medical procedures may permit direct access
of MPs to the bloodstream and tissues, serving as a potential contamination source. However, it is
evident that a comprehensive understanding of MPs’ invasion into human organs is vital for effective
mitigation strategies and the preservation of both human health and the environment.
39,000–52,000 particles per person per year based on food consumption [22]. Particles
may enter the digestive tract through contaminated food or through mucociliary clearance
following inhalation, which may trigger an inflammatory response, increase permeability,
and alter the composition and metabolism of the gut microbes [23]. According to Prata [24],
each person inhales 26–130 airborne MPs every day. A male person with light exercise is
predicted to inhale 272 MPs each day based on air sampling using a mannequin [25,26]. The
size and density of the particles will affect how they deposit on the respiratory system, with
less dense and smaller particles penetrating the lungs deeper. Particle translocation may
occur after deposition as a result of macrophage clearance, migration to the bloodstream,
or lymphatic system. Dermal contact with MPs is considered a less significant route of
exposure, although it has been speculated that nanoplastics (NPs <100 nm) could transverse
the dermal barrier [27]. Human epithelial cells suffer oxidative stress from exposure to
MPs and NPs as well [28]. Although research on the interactions between MPs and other
human organs is ongoing, human absorption models of nanomaterials created by diverse
industrial production methods can be used to estimate the potential impacts of MPs. They
have been demonstrated to infiltrate the food chain [4], and as a result, they have also
been found in human stools [29] and human blood of healthy donors [30]. Due to the
prevalence of stool contamination after vaginal birth and investigated that human placenta
from caesarean deliveries contains MPs (>50 µm).
From these pathways, MPs have recently been reported in unimaginable parts of the
body and bodily fluid systems such as liver [31], blood [31,32], heart [32], placenta [33],
breast milk [34], sputum [35], semen [36], testis [36], and urine [37]. This review shines a
spotlight on the lesser-known and more unsettling aspect of plastic pollution: the infiltration
of MPs into the human body. Through various mechanisms, such as ingestion, inhalation,
and dermal absorption, these tiny plastic particles have managed to enter our bloodstream,
lymphatic system, and organs. The implications of this phenomenon for human health are
profound and multifaceted, as MPs may carry toxic additives, adsorb harmful chemicals,
and trigger inflammatory responses. The review examines the pathways through which
MPs enter the body, exploring the role of contaminated air, water, and food sources. It
also investigates the extent to which MPs are capable of translocating within the body,
potentially leading to accumulation in critical organs such as the liver, kidneys, and even
the heart. Researchers are actively working to understand the long-term consequences
of such internal plastic exposure, including the possible links to chronic diseases such as
cancer, autoimmune disorders, and neurological conditions [31–37].
The review then takes a critical turn, examining the growing body of research suggest-
ing potential health implications linked to MPs exposure. Although the full scope of these
health effects is not yet fully understood, the review highlights some concerning findings,
such as the ability of MPs to inhibit active enzymes and the potential for inflammation and
oxidative stress caused by their presence in bodily tissues. It also underscores the need for
further studies to elucidate the long-term consequences of this silent invasion.
Table 1. Summary of MPs studies in different human organ and bodily systems.
Organ/ Analytical
Extraction Method Particle Types Shapes Quantity Reference
Fliuds Method Used
PS, PVC, PET,
KOH + NaHOCl (2:1), Fragments and 4.6 MPs/g (median)
Liver µRaman PMMA, POM, [31]
H2 O2 and ethanol microbeads ranging 4~30 µm
and PP
PET (2.4 µg/mL), PS
(4.8 µg/mL), PE
Proteinase K and PET, PS, PE,
Py-GC/MS - (7.1 µg/mL), PMMA [30] +
CaCl2 PMMA and PP
(0.36 µg/mL) and PP
Blood (0.94 µg/mL)
PET, PU, PS, PA,
30 wt % H2 O2 and PA (49%) and PET
LD-IR and SEM PVC, PE, PP, PC, Threads and rods [32] ++
ethanol (22%).
PMMA
30 wt % H2 O2 ,
PET, PU, PS, PA,
68 wt % HNO3 and PET (77%) and PU
Heart LD-IR and SEM PVC, PE, PP, PC, Threads and rods [32] ++
10 wt % NaOH, and (12%)
PMMA
ethanol
PP with some
spherical or 12 MP particles,
10% KOH µRaman other non-identify [33]
irregular shape ranging 5 to10 µm.
fragments
11 polymer types
were identified
Placenta 2.70 ± 2.65 particles/g
including PSF.
spherical or (0.28 to 9.55 particles/g).
10% KOH LD-IR Mainly PVC [38]
irregular shape Size ranged from
(43.27%), PP
20.34 to 307.29 µm
(14.55%), PBS
(10.90%)
PP, PVC, PE, PS, Sphere/ 48 MPs fragments
Breast Milk 10% KOH µRaman [34]
PES, and PEMA Irregular 2~12 µm.
Sample + 70% ethanol
21 types of MPs
(1:4) then with HNO3
PU, PES, alkyd narrower and 18.75~91.75 parti-
Sputum (68%) and NaOH µFTIR [35]
varnish longer cles/10 mL,
(neutralization) then
Size > 500 µm in siz
with ZnCl2
Fibers, fragments, 24 MPs size ranging
LD-IR and PVC, PE, PA, PS,
Semen KOH films, and 21.76~286.71 µm [36]
Py-GC/MS PP and PET
subspherical 0~2.06 particles/mL
4 MPs size ranging from
LD-IR and PS, PVC, PE, and
Testis KOH Fiber, subspherical 20~100 µm, [36]
Py-GC/MS PP
11.60 ± 15.52 particles/g
PVA, PVC, PP, Fragments/irregular 4 pigmented MPs
Urine KOH µRaman [37]
and PE MPs shape fragments 4~15 µm
Py-GC/MS: pyrolysis-gas chromatography/mass spectrometry; LD-IR: Laser Desorption-Infrared Spectroscopy;
SEM: Scanning electron microscopy; µRaman: Raman Microspectroscopy; µFTIR: Fourier Transform Infrared
micro-spectroscopy; PET: polyethylene terephthalate; PE: polyethylene; PU: polyurethane; PMMA: poly(methyl
methacrylate); PA: polyamide; PP: polypropylene; PVC: polyvinyl chloride; PC: polycarbonate; PS: polystyrene;
PBS: polybutylene succinate; PSF: polysulfone; KOH: potassium hydroxide; NaHOCl: Sodium hypochlorite;
HNO3 : nitric acid; NaOH: Sodium hydroxide; ZnCl2 : Zinc chloride; H2 O2 : hydrogen peroxide. + : Quantity is
based on maximum concentration detected in the study; ++ : samples were pre- and postoperative blood samples.
promote overall health and well-being. However, they have been faced with contamination
by MPs [31]. In Horvatits et al. [31], tissue samples from six patients with liver cirrhosis
and five healthy subjects were compared. 17 samples in all, comprising 11 liver samples,
3 kidney samples, and 3 spleen samples, were examined. The scientists used a well-known
methodology to find MPs particles in human tissue that were between 4 and 30 µm in
size. The tissue samples were chemically digested as part of this technique, then they were
stained with Nile red. The properties and make-up of the MPs were further evaluated
using µRaman and fluorescence microscopy.
According to the findings, liver, kidney, and spleen samples from healthy people did
not contain any MPs when compared to the limit of detection. In contrast, cirrhosis-affected
liver tissues revealed positive MPs quantities that were significantly greater than liver
samples from people without liver disease. The research discovered six different kinds of
MPs polymers [PS, PVC, PET, PMMA, POM, and PP] in the cirrhotic liver tissues, ranging
in size from 4 to 30 µm.
These results highlight the existence of MPs in cirrhotic liver tissues and their much
greater quantities as compared to healthy persons. Additionally, the identification of
distinct MPs offers important new information on the make-up of MPs in relation to liver
cirrhosis. However, in animal studies, research [45] has confirmed the accumulation of PS
NPs in the liver and kidneys of mice, leading to noticeable structural and functional changes
in these organs. In a related study [46], the inflammatory impact of PS NPs of varying sizes
(100 and 50 nm) and PS MPs on transgenic zebrafish larvae was investigated. Smaller NPs
were found to provoke higher levels of neutrophil aggregation and macrophage apoptosis
in the larvae’s abdomen, correlating with increased hepatic inflammation. Furthermore,
NPs were observed to dose- and size-dependently enhance the expression of the liver-
specific inflammatory binding protein fabp10a. The 50 nm PS particles at a concentration
of 0.1 mg/L increased fabp10a expression in larval livers by 21.90%. The authors propose
that these effects are contingent on NP distribution and the generation of reactive oxygen
species within the larvae. These findings deepen our comprehension of the possible effects
of MPs pollution on liver function and emphasize the value of more studies in this area to
fully comprehend the effects of MPs pollution on human health.
accumulation trends, and determining how they could affect various physiological and
cardiovascular systems as well as immunological responses and other aspects of human
health. In a recent investigation conducted by Yang et al. [32], a comprehensive analysis of
venous blood samples taken before and after cardiac surgery revealed a consistent presence
of MPs across all samples, with sizes spanning from 20 to 184 µm. Notably, the most
prevalent types of MPs were identified as PA (49%) and PET (22%), collectively constituting
over 70% of the total microplastic content. The study also unveiled concerning fluctuations
in the composition of MPs before and after surgery. For instance, PET dominated the
pre-surgery blood samples, accounting for 67% of the total MPs, while PA took precedence
in the post-surgery samples, making up 57%. The researchers identified eight distinct
types of MPs in the post-surgery blood samples, in contrast to the six types detected in
the pre-surgery blood samples. Remarkably, the prevailing diameter range of MPs shifted
between the pre- and post-surgery phases. Before the surgery, MPs primarily fell within
the 30 to 50 µm diameter range (67%), while after the surgery, a smaller diameter range
prevailed (20 to 30 µm, 51%). These findings have notable implications for both human
health and environmental awareness. The consistent presence of MPs in the bloodstream,
along with the discernible shifts in MPs’ composition and diameter range following cardiac
surgery, underscores the potential interaction between medical interventions and MPs
exposure. The prevalence of these synthetic particles, particularly those of PA and PET
origins, raises questions about their potential impact on postoperative recovery and cardio-
vascular health. Furthermore, the dynamic alterations in MPs characteristics emphasize
the intricate relationship between medical procedures and the body’s response to plastic
pollution. As research in this domain continues to unfold, it becomes imperative to com-
prehensively address the implications of MPs in the context of medical practices and their
broader consequences on human well-being and the environment.
Figure 1. (a) Part of the heart collected and analyzed for MPs; (b) distribution MPs based on sizes on
Figure 1. (a)heart
different Partparts
of the heart collected
analyzed; and analyzed
(c,d) representative samplesfor MPs;found
of MPs (b) distribution MPs based
under SEM (adapted with on size
on different heart parts
permission from [32]). analyzed; (c,d) representative samples of MPs found under SEM (adapted
with permission from [32]).
The implications of these findings remain substantial, as they underscore the per-
The researchers
vasive presence of MPs successfully
within theidentified nine categories
human cardiovascular system.of MPs (Table 1),the
Understanding with PET
(77%) and PU (12%) prevailing as the most common, constituting nearly 90% of the overal
sources, potential health effects, and routes of entry for these microscopic plastic particles
into our bodies holds significant importance for both human health and environmental
MPspreservation
content. Curiously,
endeavors.
PE was present across all tissue samples, despite comprising only
1% of the total microplastic
However, a recent overview count. Interestingly,
of research MPs
on the effects were(MPs)
of MPs absentand in
NPs two
(NPs)pericardium
on
samples, one myocardium
the cardiac sample,
physiology of aquatic two EAT
species samples,[47].
was published and When
five PAT
eaten samples. Furthermore
at 120 mg/mL,
PETPS-NPs
dominated as the impact
had a negative primary microplastic
on heart type in
rate in zebrafish the and
larvae pericardium
embryos from (96%), EAT (83%)
maternal
PAT (49%), and myocardium (43%, equivalent to PA), while PU was prominent in the LAA
and/or co-parental exposure groups due to their interaction with the cardiac sarcom-
eres [48]. In a different research on zebrafish larvae, PS-NP was only localised in the
(43%). Notably, the pericardium, PAT, and LAA exhibited the greatest variety of MP
pericardium at the highest dose of 10 ppm [49]. In this study, after 24 h of egg fertilization,
types (7 types), followed by EAT (6 types). Most MPs detected in heart samples possessed
PS-NPs that had been exposed to water gathered in the yolk sac and moved to the devel-
a diameter below
oping heart, 100 µm (Figure
gastrointestinal system,1b), with a general
gallbladder, diameter
liver, pancreas, andrange
brain spanning
in additionfrom
to 20 to
469 other
µm. Moreover, scanning
organs. Notably, exposed electron microscopy
groups displayed (SEM)bradycardia
significant images disclosed diverse
in comparison to in vivo
MPscontrols
shapes, encompassing
even threads
at the lowest PS-NP dosesand rods,
of 0.1 ppm often
[49]. accompanied
Another researchby varying
[50] degrees o
confirmed
fracture and surface roughness (Figure 1c,d).
that marine medaka pups exposed to 20 g/L PS-MPs from their parents had a considerable
reduction in heart rate. Along with hypothetical particle interactions with cardiac sarcom-
The implications of these findings remain substantial, as they underscore the perva
eres, the oxidative state produced by MPs may also have an impact on heart rate. However,
siveeven
presence of MPs
at low doses within
(10 g/L; 100 andthe1000
human
g/L were cardiovascular system. (medical
also tested), tachycardia Understanding
term the
sources, potential
for a heart health
rate >100 beatseffects, and routes
per minute) of entry
was observed for these
in goldfish microscopic
larvae exposed toplastic
PS-MPsparticles
intoand
our-NPs
bodies holds significant
combination after 7 days importance
of treatment [51].for These
both human
contrastinghealth
effectsand environmenta
on aberrant
preservation endeavors.
heart rate may be caused by this organ’s vulnerability to the oxidative stress brought on
However, a recent overview of research on the effects of MPs (MPs) and NPs (NPs
on the cardiac physiology of aquatic species was published [47]. When eaten at 120
mg/mL, PS-NPs had a negative impact on heart rate in zebrafish larvae and embryos from
maternal and/or co-parental exposure groups due to their interaction with the cardiac sar
Environments 2023, 10, 194 7 of 18
by the body’s entrance of toxic plastics. These studies suggest that MPs can interfere with
normal cardiac function, potentially contributing to cardiovascular diseases in humans.
Studies are required to fill this knowledge gap.
new information on MPs exposure and give crucial information for evaluating the possible
dangers of MPs to human health.
(BTB) deficiency and p38 pathway activation. BTB are a family of transcription factors or
co-regulators involved in gene regulation Betaine has protective effects on BTB through
downregulating the expressions of p38 MAPK phosphorylation [71], and BTB might be
damaged by activating the TGF-3/p38 MAPK pathway in rats [72]. It is yet unknown,
nevertheless, whether MPs exposure through the p38 MAPK pathway might cause BTB
impairment. Male reproduction and spermatogenesis depend on the health of the BTB
ultrastructure. Tight junctions (TJs), gap junctions (GJs), basal ectoplasmic specialization
(ESs), and desmosomes make up the BTB, which is a physical barrier created by Sertoli
cells (SCs) between blood arteries and testicular seminiferous tubules [73]. In addition to
serving as a source of nutrients, BTB also serves as a crucial physical barrier and immune-
privileged location that can block the entry of hazardous and damaging pollutants, creating
a favorable microenvironment for spermatogenesis [73]. For maintaining male reproductive
function, proper spermatogenesis is unquestionably important. Therefore, spermatogenesis
can be disturbed by the disruption of BTB normal structure, which can then result in a
reproductive problem in male mammals. Literature on the impact of MPs on BTB is still
only occasionally documented, though. According to a newly released study, mice’s BTB
could potentially be damaged by 0.5 µm PS-MPs absorbed by Sertoli cells [70]. However,
the chemical process underlying it is still not fully understood. Moreover, the physical
and chemical properties of MPs, such as their small size, large surface area, and ability to
adsorb and release toxic chemicals, raise concerns about their potential to disrupt hormonal
balance and interfere with cellular processes within the testes. As the scientific commu-
nity continues to investigate the impacts of MPs on male reproductive health, it is crucial
to explore the mechanisms through which MPs exert their effects and identify potential
long-term consequences. Further research is needed to determine the extent of human
exposure to MPs, understand their distribution and accumulation patterns within the male
reproductive system, and elucidate the mechanisms by which they may impact sperm
function, fertility, and overall reproductive health.
Environments 2023, 10, 194 sample contained both PVA and PVC MPs, while three male samples contained
11 of 18 PP and
PE MPs (Figure 2).
(a)
(b)
Figure 2. Samples
Figure 2. SamplesofofMPs
MPsunder themicroscope
under the microscope andand µRaman
µRaman spectra
spectra found found
in urineinofurine of and
(a) male (a) male and
(b) female (Adapted
(b) female (Adaptedwith
with permission from
permission from [37]).
[37]).
Environments 2023, 10, 194 From the bloodstream, MPs can potentially be distributed to various organs and tissues,
12 of 18
such as breast milk, heart, placenta, sputum, semen, testis and urine (Figure 3).
Figure
Figure 3. An
3. An overviewofofthe
overview theplausible
plausiblepathways
pathways of of MPs
MPs to
to different
differentorgans
organsand
andbodily
bodilyfluids. Intake
fluids. Intake
of MPs
of MPs areare possible
possible via
via inhalation,ingestion
inhalation, ingestion and and skin
skin contact.
contact. Once
Onceininthe
thebody,
body,they
theyare
areabsorbed
absorbed
intointo
thethe gastrointestinal
gastrointestinal tractfrom
tract fromwhich
whichititisistransported
transported to
to the
the bloodstream.
bloodstream.The
Thebloodstream
bloodstream then
then
circulates it to the different internal organs and then potentially excreted via the urine and semen.
circulates it to the different internal organs and then potentially excreted via the urine and semen.
According to one theory, MPs move from the circulation into breast milk via two
According to one theory, MPs move from the circulation into breast milk via two
different paths, each of which depends on immune cells and mammary epithelial cells,
different paths, each of which depends on immune cells and mammary epithelial cells,
with the la er being particularly important for inhaled particles [34]. The major cells in
with the latter being particularly important for inhaled particles [34]. The major cells
charge of generating and secreting breast milk are mammary epithelial cells. These cells
in charge of generating and secreting breast milk are mammary epithelial cells. These
go through particular physiological changes during lactation in order to produce and
cells go through particular physiological changes during lactation in order to produce
transport different substances, such as proteins, lipids, and carbohydrates, into breast
and transport different substances, such as proteins, lipids, and carbohydrates, into breast
milk [79]. According to the theory, during this secretion phase MPs can be picked up by
milk [79]. According to the theory, during this secretion phase MPs can be picked up by
mammary epithelial cells and then released into the breast milk. One potential explana-
mammary
tion is thatepithelial
MPs may cells
be and then released
recognised by certainintoreceptors
the breastonmilk. One potential
the surface explanation
of mammary epi-
is that MPs may be recognised by certain receptors on the surface
thelial cells once they have entered the circulation or interstitial fluid surrounding of mammary epithelial
the
cells once they
mammary have entered
glands. When the the circulation
MPs are takenor upinterstitial
by vesiclesfluid
and surrounding
carried into thethecytoplasm
mammary
glands.
of the When the MPs areknown
cell, a mechanism taken as upreceptor-mediated
by vesicles and carried into may
endocytosis the cytoplasm
be used byofthe the
cell,
cells to internalise the MPs [80]. Once within the cell, the MPs could be contained in milkto
a mechanism known as receptor-mediated endocytosis may be used by the cells
secretorythe
internalise vesicles
MPs [80].and discharged
Once withinduring lactation
the cell, the MPs into the mother’s
could milk.inPassive
be contained diffu-
milk secretory
sion isand
vesicles another possible
discharged process.
during MPs could
lactation into the diffuse
mother’sinto milk.
the cells and then
Passive be delivered
diffusion is another
to milkprocess.
possible secretory MPsvesicles
could if diffuse
their size andthe
into chemical
cells and makeup
then beenable them to pass
delivered milk past the
secretory
cellular
vesicles membranes
if their size and of chemical
mammary epithelial
makeup cells.them
enable The second
to passroute
past involves immune
the cellular cells
membranes
such as macrophages,
of mammary epithelial cells. whichTheare foundroute
second in breast tissueimmune
involves and assist insuch
cells immunological de-
as macrophages,
fence by phagocytosing and eliminating foreign substances and debris from the lungs
which are found in breast tissue and assist in immunological defence by phagocytosing
and[81]. Including foreign
eliminating MPs, these foreign particles
substances and debris allowfromfor the
engulfment andIncluding
lungs [81]. internalisation. Af-
MPs, these
ter being
foreign takenallow
particles up byfor immune
engulfmentcells and
in the lungs, MPs can
internalisation. thenbeing
After movetaken
via the
uplymphatic
by immune
system
cells in theorlungs,
circulation
MPs until theymove
can then reach viathe breast tissue, where
the lymphatic systemthey
ormay be released
circulation untilinto
they
breast
reach themilk
breastduring
tissue, lactation.
where they may be released into breast milk during lactation.
It is
It is importanttotoremember
important rememberthat thatthethe actual
actual processes
processes maymaybe bemore
morecomplicated
complicated than
than
those
those proposed,and
proposed, andthat
thatthe
theconcept
concept of of MPs
MPs translocating
translocating to tobreast
breastmilk
milkthrough
throughthese
these
routes
routes is is still
still ananactive
activearea
areaofofresearch.
research. The The MPs’
MPs’ precise
precise dimensions,
dimensions,make-up,
make-up,and and
interactions with diverse cells and tissues might have an impact on the translocation
process. The quantity and presence of MPs in breast milk may also depend on additional
variables such exposure levels, length of exposure, and individual variances.
In the case of the heart, it may take place as a result of MPs penetrating the blood
channel endothelial cells. Additionally, MPs can cause oxidative stress and inflammation,
which can cause the blood vessel barrier to rupture and let MPs into the heart tissue [32].
Environments 2023, 10, 194 13 of 18
MPs can cross the placental barrier after entering the mother’s circulation and go to the
foetal side [55]. During pregnancy, a unique structure called the placental barrier divides
the maternal blood supply from the foetal blood supply [55]. Its primary job is to defend
against hazardous chemicals while facilitating the flow of gases, nutrients, and other vital
substances. Syncytiotrophoblast, the placenta’s outermost layer, foetal endothelial cells, and
other supporting tissues make up the placental barrier’s many layers [82]. Theoretically,
there are two ways that MPs might traverse the placental barrier: (1) through microscopic
holes or breaches in the barrier, which may also be created by inflammation and barrier
disruption; (2) by endocytosis, in which MPs are taken up by cells and transported over
the barrier; and (3) immunological cells can also transfer MPs through the barrier as
part of immunological reactions. To completely comprehend the methods and degree of
microplastic transfer to the placenta, more studies are necessary.
However, factors such as their elimination by renal filtration or biliary excretion,
or their deposit in organs such as the liver, spleen, or other fenestrated capillaries and
sinusoids, dictate the fate of plastic particles inside the body [30]. Sputum can also be
used for elimination in the respiratory system. Nitrogenous waste must first be changed
by the liver into a less dangerous molecule before being released from liver cells into the
circulation and finally to the kidney [78]. Although the renal excretion may be a viable
pathway for the removal of MPs, it is known that the glomerular filtration barrier only
permits the transit of particles with sizes of 10 nm. The mechanism for this may involve
exocytosis and endocytosis close to the tubular epithelial cells after leaving the glomerulus
via the efferent artery and entering the peritubular capillaries, before the MPs are excreted
into the urine [37]. MPs can also pass through the renal tubule system, though this is less
common [37].
As the testes have a rich blood supply, it is possible that some MPs circulating in
the blood could reach the testicular tissue which include a barrier (blood-testis barrier)
(Figure 4). The testes are protected by this specialized barrier, which also helps to maintain
a stable internal environment for spermatogenesis and protects developing sperm from
harmful substances in the blood. However, some studies have suggested14that
Environments 2023, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW of 18certain
toxicants may be able to disturb this barrier [83] and thus form a pathway of MPs reaching
the testes.
Blood
Direct contact
Figure 4. Plausible
Figure pathways
4. Plausible of MPsofinto
pathways MPstheinto
testes.
the(A) is showing
testes. (A) isthe specific location
showing of thelocation
the specific blood- of the
testes barriers while
blood-testes (B) iswhile
barriers unraveling the cellular the
(B) is unraveling composition and intricate structure
cellular composition of the
and intricate blood- of the
structure
testis barrier, while exploring the supportive role of neighboring cells in maintaining barrier func-
blood-testis barrier, while exploring the supportive role of neighboring cells in maintaining barrier
tion and balance (Adapted with permission and modification from ref. [83]).
function and balance (Adapted with permission and modification from ref. [83]).
The lymphatic system is another potential pathway through which MPs could reach
the testes. The lymphatic system is a network of vessels and organs that helps to transport
lymph, a fluid containing white blood cells, throughout the body [84]. MPs may be taken
up by immune cells in the lymphatic system and transported to different tissues, including
the testes. However, in some cases, MPs may come into direct contact with the male re-
Environments 2023, 10, 194 14 of 18
The lymphatic system is another potential pathway through which MPs could reach
the testes. The lymphatic system is a network of vessels and organs that helps to transport
lymph, a fluid containing white blood cells, throughout the body [84]. MPs may be
taken up by immune cells in the lymphatic system and transported to different tissues,
including the testes. However, in some cases, MPs may come into direct contact with the
male reproductive system. For example, certain lifestyle or occupational exposures may
lead to direct contact with MPs. Once MPs are in the testes, they might then find their
way into the semen during the process of sperm maturation and secretion and through
unknown mechanisms.
It is important to emphasize that the pathways described above are hypothetical and
require further investigation and scientific evidence to be fully confirmed. As research
progresses, it will be essential to explore the mechanisms by which MPs reach the semen
and evaluate their potential impacts on male reproductive health. It is important to keep in
mind that intrusive medical procedures might provide MPs direct access to the bloodstream
and tissues. This is a potential source of contamination. There are MPs in the air in the
operating theatre, according to recent research [85,86], which suggests that MPs may
immediately descend to the surface of patients’ viscera through air [31]. It is necessary to
look at these prospective sources’ roles more thoroughly.
References
1. Verla, A.W.; Enyoh, C.E.; Verla, E.N.; Nwarnorh, K.O. Microplastic–Toxic Chemical Interaction: A Review Study on Quantified
Levels, Mechanism and Implication. SN Appl. Sci. 2019, 1, 1400. [CrossRef]
2. Andrady, A.L. MPs in the Marine Environment. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2011, 62, 1596–1605. [CrossRef]
3. Browne, M.A.; Crump, P.; Niven, S.J.; Teuten, E.; Tonkin, A.; Galloway, T.; Thompson, R. Accumulation of Microplastic on
Shorelines Woldwide: Sources and Sinks. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 9175–9179. [CrossRef]
4. Barboza, L.G.A.; Dick Vethaak, A.; Lavorante, B.R.B.O.; Lundebye, A.K.; Guilhermino, L. Marine Microplastic Debris: An
Emerging Issue for Food Security, Food Safety and Human Health. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2018, 133, 336–348. [CrossRef]
5. United Nations Environment Programme. UNEP Year Book 2011: Emerging Issues in Our Global Environment; UNEP Publications:
Nairobi, Kenya, 2011.
6. Eriksen, M.; Mason, S.; Wilson, S.; Box, C.; Zellers, A.; Edwards, W.; Farley, H.; Amato, S. Microplastic Pollution in the Surface
Waters of the Laurentian Great Lakes. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2013, 77, 177–182. [CrossRef]
7. Estahbanati, S.; Fahrenfeld, N.L. Influence of Wastewater Treatment Plant Discharges on Microplastic Concentrations in Surface
Water. Chemosphere 2016, 162, 277–284. [CrossRef]
8. Rodrigues, M.O.; Abrantes, N.; Gonçalves, F.J.M.; Nogueira, H.; Marques, J.C.; Gonçalves, A.M.M. Spatial and Temporal
Distribution of MPs in Water and Sediments of a Freshwater System (Antuã River, Portugal). Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 633,
1549–1559. [CrossRef]
9. Norén Fredrik Small Plastic Particles in Coastal Swedish Waters. N-Research 2007, 11, 1–11.
10. Mancuso, M.; Conti-Nibali, V.; Porcino, N. Monitoring of anthropogenic microplastic pollution in Antarctic fish (emerald rockcod)
from the Terranova Bay after a quarter of century. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 25, 167244. [CrossRef]
11. Abidli, S.; Antunes, J.C.; Ferreira, J.L.; Lahbib, Y.; Sobral, P.; Trigui El Menif, N. MPs in Sediments from the Littoral Zone of the
North Tunisian Coast (Mediterranean Sea). Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2018, 205, 1–9. [CrossRef]
12. Reed, S.; Clark, M.; Thompson, R.; Hughes, K.A. MPs in Marine Sediments near Rothera Research Station, Antarctica.
Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2018, 133, 460–463. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
13. Watteau, F.; Dignac, M.F.; Bouchard, A.; Revallier, A.; Houot, S. Microplastic Detection in Soil Amended With Municipal Solid
Waste Composts as Revealed by Transmission Electronic Microscopy and Pyrolysis/GC/MS. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2018, 2, 81.
[CrossRef]
14. Zhang, S.; Yang, X.; Gertsen, H.; Peters, P.; Salánki, T.; Geissen, V. A Simple Method for the Extraction and Identification of Light
Density MPs from Soil. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 616–617, 1056–1065. [CrossRef]
15. Rabin, M.H.; Wang, Q.; Enyoh, C.E.; Kai, X.; Sheuty, T.F. Distribution, Potential Sources, and Health Risk of MPs (MPs) in Street
Dust during and after COVID-19 Lockdown in Bangladesh. Environments 2023, 10, 130. [CrossRef]
16. Abbasi, S.; Keshavarzi, B.; Moore, F.; Turner, A.; Kelly, F.J.; Dominguez, A.O.; Jaafarzadeh, N. Distribution and Potential Health
Impacts of MPs and Microrubbers in Air and Street Dusts from Asaluyeh County, Iran. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 244, 153–164.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
17. Dris, R.; Gasperi, J.; Saad, M.; Mirande, C.; Tassin, B. Synthetic Fibers in Atmospheric Fallout: A Source of MPs in the Environment?
Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2016, 104, 290–293. [CrossRef]
18. Kosuth, M.; Mason, S.A.; Wattenberg, E.V. Anthropogenic Contamination of Tap Water, Beer, and Sea Salt. PLoS ONE 2018,
13, e0194970. [CrossRef]
19. Reed, C. Dawn of the Plasticene Age. New Sci. 2015, 225, 28–32. [CrossRef]
20. Enyoh, C.E.; Shafea, L.; Verla, A.W.; Verla, E.N.; Qingyue, W.; Chowdhury, T.; Paredes, M. MPs Exposure Routes and Toxicity
Studies to Ecosystems: An Overview. Environ. Health Toxicol. 2020, 35, e2020004. [CrossRef]
21. Galloway, T.S. Micro-and Nano-Plastics and Human Health. Mar. Anthropog. Litter 2015, 12, 343–366.
22. Cox, K.D.; Covernton, G.A.; Davies, H.L.; Dower, J.F.; Juanes, F.; Dudas, S.E. Human Consumption of MPs. Environ. Sci. Technol.
2019, 53, 7068–7074. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
23. Salim, S.; Kaplan, G.; Madsen, K.L. Air Pollution Effects on the Gut Microbiota: A Link between Exposure and Inflammatory
Disease. Gut Microbes 2013, 5, 215–219. [CrossRef]
24. Prata, J.C. Airborne MPs: Consequences to Human Health? Environ. Pollut. 2018, 234, 115–126. [CrossRef]
25. Vianello, A.; Jensen, R.L.; Liu, L.; Vollertsen, J. Simulating Human Exposure to Indoor Airborne MPs Using a Breathing Thermal
Manikin. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 8670. [CrossRef]
26. Enyoh, C.E.; Verla, A.W.; Verla, E.N.; Ibe, F.C.; Amaobi, C.E. Airborne MPs: A Review Study on Method for Analysis, Occurrence,
Movement and Risks. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2019, 191, 1–17. [CrossRef]
Environments 2023, 10, 194 16 of 18
27. Revel, M.; Châtel, A.; Mouneyrac, C. Micro (Nano) Plastics: A Threat to Human Health? Curr. Opin. Environ. Sci. Health 2018, 1,
17–23. [CrossRef]
28. Schirinzi, G.F.; Pérez-Pomeda, I.; Sanchís, J.; Rossini, C.; Farré, M.; Barceló, D. Cytotoxic Effects of Commonly Used Nanomaterials
and MPs on Cerebral and Epithelial Human Cells. Environ. Res. 2017, 159, 579–587. [CrossRef]
29. Schwabl, P.; Koppel, S.; Konigshofer, P.; Bucsics, T.; Trauner, M.; Reiberger, T.; Liebmann, B. Detection of Various MPs in Human
Stool: A Prospective Case Series. Ann. Intern. Med. 2019, 171, 453–457. [CrossRef]
30. Leslie, H.A.; van Velzen, M.J.M.; Brandsma, S.H.; Vethaak, A.D.; Garcia-Vallejo, J.J.; Lamoree, M.H. Discovery and Quantification
of Plastic Particle Pollution in Human Blood. Environ. Int. 2022, 163, 107199. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
31. Horvatits, T.; Tamminga, M.; Liu, B.; Sebode, M.; Carambia, A.; Fischer, L.; Püschel, K.; Huber, S.; Fischer, E.K. MPs Detected in
Cirrhotic Liver Tissue. eBioMedicine 2022, 82, 104147. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
32. Yang, Y.; Xie, E.; Du, Z.; Peng, Z.; Han, Z.; Li, L.; Zhao, R.; Qin, Y.; Xue, M.; Li, F.; et al. Detection of Various MPs in Patients
Undergoing Cardiac Surgery. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 57, 10911–10918. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
33. Ragusa, A.; Svelato, A.; Santacroce, C.; Catalano, P.; Notarstefano, V.; Carnevali, O.; Papa, F.; Rongioletti, M.C.A.; Baiocco, F.;
Draghi, S.; et al. Plasticenta: First Evidence of MPs in Human Placenta. Environ. Int. 2021, 146, 106274. [CrossRef]
34. Ragusa, A.; Notarstefano, V.; Svelato, A.; Belloni, A.; Gioacchini, G.; Blondeel, C.; Zucchelli, E.; De Luca, C.; D’avino, S.; Gulotta,
A.; et al. Raman Microspectroscopy Detection and Characterisation of MPs in Human Breastmilk. Polymers 2022, 14, 2700.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
35. Huang, S.; Huang, X.; Bi, R.; Guo, Q.; Yu, X.; Zeng, Q.; Huang, Z.; Liu, T.; Wu, H.; Chen, Y.; et al. Detection and Analysis of MPs
in Human Sputum. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 56, 2476–2486. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
36. Zhao, Q.; Zhu, L.; Weng, J.; Jin, Z.; Cao, Y.; Jiang, H.; Zhang, Z. Detection and Characterization of MPs in the Human Testis and
Semen. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 877, 162713. [CrossRef]
37. Pironti, C.; Notarstefano, V.; Ricciardi, M.; Motta, O.; Giorgini, E.; Montano, L. First Evidence of MPs in Human Urine, a
Preliminary Study of Intake in the Human Body. Toxics 2023, 11, 40. [CrossRef]
38. Zhu, L.; Zhu, J.; Zuo, R.; Xu, Q.; Qian, Y.; AN, L. Identification of MPs in Human Placenta Using Laser Direct Infrared Spectroscopy.
Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 856, 159060. [CrossRef]
39. Trefts, E.; Gannon, M.; Wasserman, D.H. The Liver. Curr. Biol. 2017, 27, R1147–R1151. [CrossRef]
40. Kalra, A.; Yetiskul, E.; Wehrle, C.J.; Tuma, F. Physiology, Liver; St. StatPearls Publishing: Petersburg, FL, USA, 2023.
41. Ogobuiro, I.; Tuma, F. Physiology, Renal. StatPearls 2022. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK538339/
(accessed on 1 November 2023).
42. Soriano, R.M.; Penfold, D.; Leslie, S.W. Anatomy, Abdomen and Pelvis: Kidneys. StatPearls 2022. Available online: https://www.ncbi.
nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK482385/ (accessed on 1 November 2023).
43. Mebius, R.; Kraal, G. Structure and Function of the Spleen. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2005, 5, 606–616. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
44. Cesta, M.F. Normal Structure, Function, and Histology of the Spleen. Toxicol. Pathol. 2006, 34, 455–465. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
45. Haldar, S.; Yhome, N.; Muralidaran, Y.; Rajagopal, S.; Mishra, P. Nanoplastics Toxicity Specific to Liver in Inducing Metabolic
Dysfunction—A Comprehensive Review. Genes 2023, 14, 590. [CrossRef]
46. Cheng, H.; Zhenghua, D.; Yinghong, W.; Yudi, W.; Haihong, Z.; Yansong, S.; Huajing, Z.; Yanjie, W.; Hongwen, S. Immunotoxicity
responses to polystyrene nanoplastics and their related mechanisms in the liver of zebrafish (Danio rerio) larvae. Environ. Int.
2022, 161, 107128. [CrossRef]
47. Persiani, E.; Cecchettini, A.; Ceccherini, E.; Gisone, I.; Morales, M.A.; Vozzi, F. MPs: A Matter of the Heart (and Vascular System).
Biomedicines 2023, 11, 264. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
48. Pitt, J.A.; Trevisan, R.; Massarsky, A.; Kozal, J.S.; Levin, E.D.; Di Giulio, R.T. Maternal Transfer of NPs to Offspring in Zebrafish
(Danio Rerio): A Case Study with Nanopolystyrene. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 643, 324–334. [CrossRef]
49. Pitt, J.A.; Kozal, J.S.; Jayasundara, N.; Massarsky, A.; Trevisan, R.; Geitner, N.; Wiesner, M.; Levin, E.D.; Di Giulio, R.T. Uptake,
Tissue Distribution, and Toxicity of Polystyrene Nanoparticles in Developing Zebrafish (Danio Rerio). Aquat. Toxicol. 2018, 194,
185–194. [CrossRef]
50. Wang, J.; Li, Y.; Lu, L.; Zheng, M.; Zhang, X.; Tian, H.; Wang, W.; Ru, S. Polystyrene MPs Cause Tissue Damages, Sex-Specific
Reproductive Disruption and Transgenerational Effects in Marine Medaka (Oryzias Melastigma). Environ. Pollut. 2019, 254, 113024.
[CrossRef]
51. Acharya, S.; Rumi, S.S.; Hu, Y.; Abidi, N. Microfibers from Synthetic Textiles as a Major Source of MPs in the Environment: A
Review. Text. Res. J. 2021, 91, 2136–2156. [CrossRef]
52. Turco, M.Y.; Moffett, A. Development of the Human Placenta. Development 2019, 146, dev163428. [CrossRef]
53. Burton, G.J.; Jauniaux, E. What Is the Placenta? Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2015, 213, S6.e1–S6.e4. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
54. Wright, S.L.; Kelly, F.J. Plastic and Human Health: A Micro Issue? Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 6634–6647. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
55. Enyoh, C.E.; Duru, C.E.; Ovuoraye, P.E.; Wang, Q. Evaluation of NPs Toxicity to the Human Placenta in Systems. J. Hazard. Mater.
2023, 446, 130600. [CrossRef]
56. Enyoh, C.E.; Ovuoraye, P.E.; Qingyue, W.; Wang, W. Examining the Impact of NPs and PFAS Exposure on Immune Functions
through Inhibition of Secretory Immunoglobin A in Human Breast Milk. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 459, 132103. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Environments 2023, 10, 194 17 of 18
57. Dunne-Castagna, V.P.; Mills, D.A.; Lönnerdal, B. Effects of Milk Secretory Immunoglobulin A on the Commensal Microbiota.
Nestle Nutr. Inst. Workshop Ser. 2020, 94, 158–168. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
58. Shen, F.; Sergi, C. Sputum Analysis. In The Pocketbook of Chest Physiotherapy; Jaypee: New Delhi, India, 2023; Volume 43. [CrossRef]
59. Ostrer, H.; Huang, H.Y.; Masch, R.J.; Shapiro, E. A Cellular Study of Human Testis Development. Sex. Dev. 2007, 1, 286–292.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
60. Jin, H.; Yan, M.; Pan, C.; Liu, Z.; Sha, X.; Jiang, C.; Li, L.; Pan, M.; Li, D.; Han, X.; et al. Chronic Exposure to Polystyrene Microplas-
tics Induced Male Reproductive Toxicity and Decreased Testosterone Levels via the LH-Mediated LHR/CAMP/PKA/StAR
Pathway. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 2022, 19, 13. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
61. Hou, B.; Wang, F.; Liu, T.; Wang, Z. Reproductive Toxicity of Polystyrene Microplastics: In Vivo Experimental Study on Testicular
Toxicity in Mice. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 405, 124028. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
62. An, R.; Wang, X.; Yang, L.; Zhang, J.; Wang, N.; Xu, F.; Hou, Y.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, L. Polystyrene Microplastics Cause Granulosa
Cells Apoptosis and Fibrosis in Ovary through Oxidative Stress in Rats. Toxicology 2021, 449, 152665. [CrossRef]
63. Rochman, C.M.; Kurobe, T.; Flores, I.; Teh, S.J. Early Warning Signs of Endocrine Disruption in Adult Fish from the Ingestion of
Polyethylene with and without Sorbed Chemical Pollutants from the Marine Environment. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 493, 656–661.
[CrossRef]
64. Sussarellu, R.; Suquet, M.; Thomas, Y.; Lambert, C.; Fabioux, C.; Pernet, M.E.J.; Le Goïc, N.; Quillien, V.; Mingant, C.; Epelboin,
Y.; et al. Oyster Reproduction Is Affected by Exposure to Polystyrene MPs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 2430–2435.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
65. Xie, X.; Deng, T.; Duan, J.; Xie, J.; Yuan, J.; Chen, M. Exposure to Polystyrene MPs Causes Reproductive Toxicity through Oxidative
Stress and Activation of the P38 MAPK Signaling Pathway. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 190, 110133. [CrossRef]
66. Zhu, K.; Jia, H.; Sun, Y.; Dai, Y.; Zhang, C.; Guo, X.; Wang, T.; Zhu, L. Long-Term Phototransformation of MPs under Simulated
Sunlight Irradiation in Aquatic Environments: Roles of Reactive Oxygen Species. Water Res. 2020, 173, 115564. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
67. Hamed, M.; Soliman, H.A.M.; Osman, A.G.M.; Sayed, A.E.D.H. Antioxidants and Molecular Damage in Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis
Niloticus) after Exposure to MPs. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 14581–14588. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
68. Jin, H.; Ma, T.; Sha, X.; Liu, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Meng, X.; Chen, Y.; Han, X.; Ding, J. Polystyrene MPs Induced Male Reproductive
Toxicity in Mice. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 401, 123430. [CrossRef]
69. Jiang, D.; Im, H.-J.; Boleyn, M.E.; England, C.G.; Ni, D.; Kang, L.; Engle, J.W.; Huang, P.; Lan, X.; Cai, W. Efficient Renal Clearance
of DNA Tetrahedron Nanoparticles Enables Quantitative Evaluation of Kidney Function. Nano Res. 2019, 12, 637–642. [CrossRef]
70. Liu, J.; Ren, L.; Wei, J.; Zhang, J.; Zhu, Y.; Li, X.; Jing, L.; Duan, J.; Zhou, X.; Sun, Z. Fine Particle Matter Disrupts the Blood–Testis
Barrier by Activating TGF-B3/P38 MAPK Pathway and Decreasing Testosterone Secretion in Rat. Environ. Toxicol. 2018, 33,
711–719. [CrossRef]
71. Mruk, D.D.; Cheng, C.Y. Sertoli-Sertoli and Sertoli-Germ Cell Interactions and Their Significance in Germ Cell Movement in the
Seminiferous Epithelium during Spermatogenesis. Endocr. Rev. 2004, 25, 747–806. [CrossRef]
72. Brouard, V.; Guénon, I.; Bouraima-Lelong, H.; Delalande, C. Differential Effects of Bisphenol A and Estradiol on Rat Spermatoge-
nesis’ Establishment. Reprod. Toxicol. 2016, 63, 49–61. [CrossRef]
73. Queremel Milani DA, J.I. Urinalysis. In A Medication Guide to Internal Medicine Tests and Procedures; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The
Netherlands, 2023; pp. 261–264. [CrossRef]
74. Maciel, A.T.; Vitorio, D.; Osawa, E.A. Urine biochemistry assessment in the sequential evaluation of renal function: Time to think
outside the box. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022, 26, 912877. [CrossRef]
75. Shuaib Ibrahim, Y.; Tuan Anuar, S.; Azmi, A.A.; Mohd Afiq Wan Mohd Khalik, W.; Lehata, S.; Rabaah Hamzah, S.; Ismail, D.;
Feei Ma, Z.; Dzulkarnaen, A.; Zakaria, Z.; et al. Detection of MPs in Human Colectomy Specimens. JGH Open 2020, 5, 116–121.
[CrossRef]
76. Prata, J.C.; da Costa, J.P.; Lopes, I.; Duarte, A.C.; Rocha-Santos, T. Environmental Exposure to MPs: An Overview on Possible
Human Health Effects. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 702, 134455. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
77. Watanabe, T. Physiological and Pathological Interactions between Liver and Kidney. Liver Syst. Dis. 2016, 221–249. [CrossRef]
78. McManaman, J.L. Lipid Transport in the Lactating Mammary Gland. J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia 2014, 19, 35–42. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
79. Severin, E.S.; Posypanova, G.A. [Molecular Physiology of Receptor Mediated Endocytosis and Its Role in Overcoming Multidrug
Resistance]. Ross. Fiziol. Zh. Im. IM Sechenova 2011, 97, 553–565.
80. Hallett, M.B. An Introduction to Phagocytosis. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2020, 1246, 1–7. [CrossRef]
81. Zhu, D.; Gong, X.; Miao, L.; Fang, J.; Reports, J.Z.-S.C. Efficient Induction of Syncytiotrophoblast Layer II Cells from Trophoblast
Stem Cells by Canonical Wnt Signaling Activation. Stem Cell Rep. 2017, 9, 2034–2049. [CrossRef]
82. Yan Cheng, C.; Mruk, D.D. The Blood-Testis Barrier and Its Implications for Male Contraception. Pharmacol. Rev. 2012, 64, 16–64.
[CrossRef]
83. Schindell, B.; Webb, A.; Kindrachuk, J. Persistence and Sexual Transmission of Filoviruses. Viruses 2018, 10, 683. [CrossRef]
84. Braun, T.; Ehrlich, L.; Henrich, W.; Koeppel, S.; Lomako, I.; Schwabl, P.; Liebmann, B.; Fricker, G.; Deli, M.A. Detection of
Microplastic in Human Placenta and Meconium in a Clinical Setting. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 921. [CrossRef]
Environments 2023, 10, 194 18 of 18
85. Field, D.T.; Green, J.L.; Bennett, R.; Jenner, L.C.; Sadofsky, L.R.; Chapman, E.; Loubani, M.; Rotchell, J.M. MPs in the Surgical
Environment. Environ. Int. 2022, 170, 107630. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
86. Petersen, E.J.; Ana, C.B.; Theodore, B.H.; Monique, E.J.; Albert, A.K.; Antonio, R.; Montoro, B.; Joanna, M.; Matthias, R.; Jian, Z.;
et al. Potential Artifacts and Control Experiments in Toxicity Tests of Nanoplastic and Microplastic Particles. Environ. Sci. Technol.
2022, 56, 15192–15206. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual
author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to
people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.