How applicable is the use of artificial intelligence in protective intelligence

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative force across various

domains and its application in protective intelligence is no exception. The integration
of artificial intelligence technologies in protective intelligence holds immense
potential for enhancing threat detention, risk assessment and response strategies.
However, the applicability of AI in protective intelligence is contingent upon several
factors, including data quality, ethical considerations and the need for human
oversight. Protective intelligence refers to the proactive identification and mitigation
of threats to individuals, organisations or assets.

One of the primary advantages of employing AI in protective intelligence is its ability

to analyse vast amounts of data rapidly (Smith and Jones, 2020). AI models must
adhere to data protection principles to ensure fairness and prevent discriminatory
outcomes. AI algorithms can shift through diverse sources of information including
social media, open source intelligence and internal databases to identify patterns,
anomalies and potential threats (Klabjan and Wassenhove, 2019). This capability
enables security professionals to stay ahead of emerging risks and take proactive
measures to mitigate them. For example, AI-powered surveillance systems can
analyse video feeds in real time to detect suspicious behaviour or unauthorised
access to secure areas, thereby enhancing perimeter security. Organisations need to
strike a balance between leveraging AI for intelligence purposes and respecting
individuals’ privacy rights.

AI-driven predictive analytics can forecast potential threats based on historical data
and evolving trends. By analysing past security incidents, AI algorithms can identify
common vulnerabilities and predict future risks, enabling organisations to allocate
resources more effectively and implement pre-emptive security measures. For
example, predictive models can assess the likelihood of specific events like protests,
cyberattacks, or physical threats based on historical patterns. Protective intelligence
teams can use AI-driven risk assessment to allocate resources effectively and
prioritize security measures (Johnson and Lee, 2018).
AI systems can automatically detect cyber threats, generate alerts and identify new
strains of malware (Bates, 2020). This capability is vital for safeguarding online
systems against unauthorised access and cybercriminal activities. In protective
intelligence, AI can analyse patterns, monitor network traffic and identify potential
security breaches. It assists in early threat detection and proactive risk mitigation
(Brown and White, 2019). For instance, AI-powered risk assessment tools can
analyse travel itineraries, social media activity and other relevant factors to identify
individuals with a high likelihood of posing a security threat, thus enabling proactive
intervention by security personnel.

Moreover, AI technologies can augment traditional investigative techniques by

automating tedious tasks and enhancing data analysis capabilities. Natural Language
Processing (NLP) algorithms for instance, can process and analyse large volumes of
textual data, such as incident reports, witness statements and threats assessments
to extract actionable insights and identify potential connections between disparate
pieces of information. This enables investigators to prioritize leads, uncover hidden
patterns and accelerate the investigative process. This NLP techniques enable AI
systems to process and understand human language. In protective intelligence, NLP
can analyse social media posts, news articles and other textual data to identify
emerging threats or sentiments (Rath, Connell and Bolle, 2019). Sentiments analysis
helps gauge public opinion, track potential threats and assess the impact of events.

Furthermore, AI can be used for surveillance and image recognition. AI-powered

surveillance systems can monitor public spaces, identify suspicious behaviour and
track individuals of interest. Image recognition algorithms can analyse visual data
from security cameras, drones or social media to detect anomalies or recognise
known threats. AI can automate vulnerability scans, identify weaknesses in systems
and simulate attacks (Garcia and Patel, 2017). This proactive approach helps
organisations strengthen their defences. In protective intelligence understanding
vulnerabilities which are both physical and digital is crucial for risk mitigation.

AI can also analyse behavioural and insider treat detention in protective intelligence.
Insider threat detention involves monitoring employees’ behaviour, access logs and
communication channels using AI algorithms (Nath and Jain, 2020). AI model can
learn normal behaviour patterns within an organisation or community. Any
deviations from these patterns may signal potential threats. AI can assist security
analysts by providing decision support systems that aggregate and analyse
information from multiple sources. These systems can integrate data from various
sensors, databases and intelligence feeds, enabling security professionals to have a
comprehensive understanding of the threat landscape and make informed decisions.

Despite these benefits, the applicability of AI in protective intelligence is not without

challenges and limitations. One of the primary concerns is the quality and reliability
of the data used to train AI algorithms. Biases inherent in the training data or
limitations in data coverage can lead to inaccuracies and false positives, undermining
the effectiveness of AI-powered threat detection systems (Garcia-Cuesta et al.,
2021). However, access to trustworthy and comprehensive datasets in protective
intelligence may be limited leading to potential biases and erroneous outputs.

Moreover, the reliance on AI-driven algorithms raises ethical considerations

regarding privacy, transparency and accountability (Danks, 2017). For example, AI-
powered surveillance systems may infringe upon individuals’ privacy rights if not
implemented and monitored responsibly. The use of AI in protective intelligence
raises concerns regarding the privacy and civil rights of individuals. Collecting and
analysing personal data may infringe upon individual freedoms, necessitating careful
implementation and adherence to regulations.

Another challenge is the need for human oversight and intervention in AI-driven
protective intelligence systems. While AI algorithms can automate certain aspects of
threats detection and risk assessment, human judgement and expertise remain
essential for interpreting results, making informed decisions and taking appropriate
actions. Additionally, AI systems are susceptible to adversarial attacks and
manipulation, highlighting the importance of robust cybersecurity measures and
ongoing monitoring to safeguard against potential threats. Human oversight is
crucial to ensure that AI- generated insights are accurate, relevant and appropriately
applied within protective intelligence operations (Paresuraman, 2017).
In conclusion, the use of artificial intelligence in protective intelligence has the
protective to revolutionise threat detection, risk assessment and response strategies.
By leveraging AI-driven technologies, security professionals can analyse vast
amounts of data, predict emerging threats and augment traditional investigative
techniques. However, the applicability of AI in protective intelligence is contingent
upon addressing challenges related to data quality, ethical considerations and the
need for human oversight. Ultimately, a balanced approach that integrates AI
technologies with human expertise and judgement is essential for maximizing the
effectiveness of protective intelligence efforts while upholding ethical and legal
standards.
REFERENCES

Bates, J. (2020). Artificial intelligence and the future of cybersecurity. International

Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 11 (5), 35-42.

Brown, C. and White, L. (2019). Enhancing Threat Detention and Analysis with AI in
Protective Intelligence. International Journal of Intelligence and Security, 8 (4), 321-
335.

Garcia, S. and Patel, R. (2017). AI-Powered Surveillance Systems for Enhanced

Security Monitoring in Protective Intelligence. Journal of Information Security, 12
(1), 25-70.

Johnson, K. and Lee, M. (2018). Leveraging Predictive Analytics for Threat

Assessment in Protective Intelligence, Security Management Review, 25 (3), 78-92.

Johnson, T. (2020). Artificial intelligence in protective intelligence: From theory to

practice. Journal of Strategic Security, 13 (1), 1-26.

Manly, B. F. J. (2011). Applications of Multivariate Data Analysis. Cengage Learning

EMEA.

Nath, A. and Jain, A. K. (2020). A survey on deep learning in video surveillance. ACM
Computing Surveys, 53 (6), 1-36.

Ratha, N. K., Connell, J. H. and Bolle, R. M. (2019). Facial recognition technology: A

survey of policy and implementation issues. IEEE Security and Privacy, 17 (2), 9-24.

Smith, J. (2020). Artificial Intelligence in Security and Protective Intelligence.

Security Management, 64 (3), 45-48.

Smith, J. and Jones, A. (2020). The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Protective

Intelligence. Journal of Security Studies, 15 (2), 45-62.