Professional Documents
Culture Documents
How To Validate and Score A Level
How To Validate and Score A Level
How To Validate and Score A Level
• The demand being greater than the supply causes buyers to outbid each
other. At some point, the buyers have exhausted themselves and everyone
who wanted to buy has already done so, or is prevented from buying due to
the high cost
• Prices start to fall as mass fear takes control. Most traders will start to panic
when the price starts moving against them or their stops will be triggered. If
there was a lot of buying pressure and large bullish candles going into the
supply level, there will be few buyers to stop the collapse and catch the
supply being dumped onto the markets from stop orders being triggered
• Compare this with a gradual climb with smaller bullish candles and some
small pullbacks to shake out weak traders. As prices drops from a supply
level in this scenario, they will be met with less stop orders and more buying
pressure since the demand was not exhausted on the way
• up
A strong move in price away from a level indicates that not all orders were
filled. For example, at the origin of a demand level, there are not enough sell
orders to fulfill the total amount of buy orders. This is why price moves away in
such a strong fashion. When price returns to these levels, the novice traders (those
who don't know about supply and demand) are selling into an area where
institutions (professionals) have their buy orders. Institutions and professionals buy
to the novices, and then there are no more sell orders so price must rise again. The
opposite holds true for supply levels. In both cases, the novice traders provide the
liquidity the institutions need to get their orders out in the market.
The best opportunities are where we can buy at the cheapest price
possible (wholesale prices) and sell and the most expensive price
possible (retail prices). This is the same in any market. Supply and demand
levels on a price chart show all these levels, you just have to learn how to draw
them.
There is a collection of short 4-15 minutes videos that explain each odd
enhancer at the Core Strategy Video channel. Most are linked lower on each
sub-post, but all of them are at the Core Strategy Video channel.Make sure
you watch all of them once you've read this lesson
These are some common factors to consider when choosing levels to trade from are
listed below:
A zone needs to take out its opposing zone (same TF) in order to be validated
as a zone. For instance, a zone will become supply if it takes out an opposing
demand zone, but also that opposing demand zone should have taken out its
opposing supply zone in the first place.
The variables above are some of the main factors that should be taken into account
when deciding which levels to trade. I personally use these variables to fine tune
the level picking process. Remember that trading is a game's number, it's all about
statistics.
Don't get me wrong. The strength of departure is what defines an area of supply or
demand. The stronger and more explosive the departure, the stronger the imbalance
and the higher the odds for a successful retest.
We must differentiate between imbalances that are tradable versus imbalances that
are non-tradable? How does it work?
The score of a level will tell us if we can trade it or not BUT that will NOT
change the fact that it's supply.
This analogy will help to explain this difference:A woman has different
attributes different to men, men like women, but you may not like certain women
because you don't like blondies or thin women. The fact that you don't like thin
women does not negate the nature of a woman, a woman is a woman. Same applies
to imbalances, an imbalances that takes out opposing one IS confirmed an
imbalance, but is it tradable? Score it and you will find out
Let's use the macro and infinitesimal world (bigger TF versus smaller TF) to make
a comparison, let's also use physics and mathematics as a reference/guidance.
There will be a moment when you will reach the beginning of time (Big Bang in
that currency or instrument), and there will be no level to be taken out since there
is no level that could be originated out of the blue (instantaneous energy at the
origin of all things, read Stephen Hawkins here). Which was then first? Was there
a beginning of the beginning or imbalances just existed by themselves? Did the egg
came first or the was it the chicken?
The answer is, imbalances exist by themselves created by the forces that
govern the markets, that is, the institutions and professionals. At the beginning
of an instrument's history there is a mixture of professionals plus retailers, then
professionals take control. From then on, we will start using the TL to assess the
dynamics of the markets at any given timeframe. If the TL is broken then a new
level is created out of the blue (energy out of nowhere = professionals) that might
be trying to move the markets (market makers). That new imbalance that breaks
the TL which is created out of the blue is considered a new SD zone that does not
need to take out any previous zone, thus the "loop is broken" once a TL is broken.
#2
21st October 2013, 02:03 PM
STRENGTH OF DEPARTURE
• An unfilled gap is the strongest look of departure, price will tend to fill that
gap in the short term or in the future.
• At least 2-3 several ERC candles closing at or near the 80% range of a
candle range makes a level strong, it’s the most common look for a strong
level
• Candles departing slowly from a zone (tsumo departure) is not a good sign,
we need exciting or ERC candles away from a level, that will stand for a
strong imbalance.
• We won’t lean on weak levels, this is why we have a big red X on the weak
zone, we don't want that look
We want MINIMUM a strong or strongest look with unfilled gap for a level.
• The first pullback is always the highest odds. We will ONLY and
ALWAYS trade the first pullback, that is, only fresh levels
• The second pullback does not have the same odds, we want the highest odds
for our trades, thus we will skip second pullbacks and wait for confirmation
• Taking a 3rd pullback into a level is forbidden, that would mean we’d be
trading a used-up level. Low odds of success, no trade
There are circumstances where we might decide to tweak the 2:1 imbalance
rule. Do not tweak this rule as a norm, or you will have a lot of unnecessary losses.
These circumstances will depend on two variables:
1. Location of the level. It's right at the breakout spot of a bigger timeframe
zone
2. What the level has accomplished. It's not always only about the imbalance,
we must assess and understand what the level has accomplished. The level
might not be 2:1 but it was the one that broke a bigger timeframe Trendline
or an important supply/demand zone on a bigger timeframe
#5
23rd March 2014, 09:31 AM
MINIMUM RISK REWARD RATIO TO VALIDATE SD LEVEL
• Arrival into a level is key to setting & forgetting our trades. Proper and
well-formed basing before a level is not a good sign. Opposing levels near
your entry level subtract profit margin from your area. Look for a smooth
and strong rally or drop into your entry level
• The steeper and stronger the arrival (ERC candles without pause) is the
stronger the bounce will possibly be. If you arrive to a demand zone with
large red candles signaling panic and fear, you are likely to have a bigger
and better bounce. The large red candles signal that everyone who wanted to
sell has now exited. When buyers step in they must raise their bids quickly
to attract a seller who may still be around
• Strong well-formed Supply zone formed before demand. If the arrival
to the demand zone is quiet with well structured levels, there are still
many worried holders who are looking to sell at a smaller loss when the
bounce occurs. This added supply will normally mute the bounce of price
from the demand level. This will normally mean new supply zones right
before the demand zone
NE
W WELL FORMED ZONE BEFORE AN OPPOSING ZONE
chart