Nonlinear Systems and Their

Remarkable Mathematical Structures

Volume 1 1st Edition Norbert Euler
Visit to download the full and correct content document:
https://ebookmeta.com/product/nonlinear-systems-and-their-remarkable-mathematica
l-structures-volume-1-1st-edition-norbert-euler/
More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant
download maybe you interests ...

3D Imaging Technologies■Multi-dimensional Signal

Processing and Deep Learning: Mathematical Approaches
and Applications, Volume 1 (Smart Innovation, Systems
and Technologies, 234)
https://ebookmeta.com/product/3d-imaging-
technologies%e2%80%95multi-dimensional-signal-processing-and-
deep-learning-mathematical-approaches-and-applications-
volume-1-smart-innovation-systems-and-technologies-234/

Nonlinear Wave and Plasma Structures in the Auroral and

Subauroral Geospace 1st Edition Evgeny Mishin

https://ebookmeta.com/product/nonlinear-wave-and-plasma-
structures-in-the-auroral-and-subauroral-geospace-1st-edition-
evgeny-mishin/

Ball RedBook Greenhouse Structures Equipment and

Technology Volume 1 19th Edition Chris Beytes

https://ebookmeta.com/product/ball-redbook-greenhouse-structures-
equipment-and-technology-volume-1-19th-edition-chris-beytes/

Statistical and Nonlinear Physics: A Volume in the

Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science 2nd
Edition Robert A. Meyers

https://ebookmeta.com/product/statistical-and-nonlinear-physics-
a-volume-in-the-encyclopedia-of-complexity-and-systems-
science-2nd-edition-robert-a-meyers/
Dynamical Systems and Nonlinear Waves in Plasmas 1st
Edition Santo Banerjee

https://ebookmeta.com/product/dynamical-systems-and-nonlinear-
waves-in-plasmas-1st-edition-santo-banerjee/

American Studies in Europe, Volume 1: Their History and

Present Organization Sigmund Skard

https://ebookmeta.com/product/american-studies-in-europe-
volume-1-their-history-and-present-organization-sigmund-skard/

Nonlinear Mechanics of Complex Structures: From Theory

to Engineering Applications Holm Altenbach

https://ebookmeta.com/product/nonlinear-mechanics-of-complex-
structures-from-theory-to-engineering-applications-holm-
altenbach/

Introduction to the Mathematical Physics of Nonlinear

Waves 2nd Edition Minoru Fujimoto

https://ebookmeta.com/product/introduction-to-the-mathematical-
physics-of-nonlinear-waves-2nd-edition-minoru-fujimoto/

Mathematical Feynman Path Integrals And Their

Applications second Edition Sonia Mazzucchi

https://ebookmeta.com/product/mathematical-feynman-path-
integrals-and-their-applications-second-edition-sonia-mazzucchi/
 i i

i i

Nonlinear Systems and

Their Remarkable
Mathematical Structures

i i

i i
 i i

i i

i i

i i
 i i

i i

Nonlinear Systems and

Their Remarkable
Mathematical Structures

Edited by

Norbert Euler

i i

i i
 i i

i i

Photo of acrylic painting titled “The Apollonius Problem” by Nora Euler (March 2017)

CRC Press
Taylor & Francis Group
6000 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Suite 300
Boca Raton, FL 33487-2742

© 2019 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC

CRC Press is an imprint of Taylor & Francis Group, an Informa business

No claim to original U.S. Government works

Printed on acid-free paper

Version Date: 20181022

International Standard Book Number-13: 978-1-1386-0100-0 (Hardback)

This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources. Reasonable efforts have been
made to publish reliable data and information, but the author and publisher cannot assume responsibility for the validity
of all materials or the consequences of their use. The authors and publishers have attempted to trace the copyright
holders of all material reproduced in this publication and apologize to copyright holders if permission to publish in this
form has not been obtained. If any copyright material has not been acknowledged please write and let us know so we may
rectify in any future reprint.

Except as permitted under U.S. Copyright Law, no part of this book may be reprinted, reproduced, transmitted, or utilized
in any form by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying,
microfilming, and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without written permission from the
publishers.

For permission to photocopy or use material electronically from this work, please access www.copyright.com
(http://www.copyright.com/) or contact the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. (CCC), 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers,
MA 01923, 978-750-8400. CCC is a not-for-profit organization that provides licenses and registration for a variety of
users. For organizations that have been granted a photocopy license by the CCC, a separate system of payment has been
arranged.

Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for
identification and explanation without intent to infringe.
Visit the Taylor & Francis Web site at
http://www.taylorandfrancis.com
and the CRC Press Web site at
http://www.crcpress.com

i i

i i
 i i

i i

Contents

Preface . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xiii

The Authors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xv

Part A: Nonlinear Integrable Systems

A1. Systems of nonlinearly-coupled differential equations solvable
by algebraic operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

F Calogero

1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
2. The main idea and some key identities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
3. Two examples of systems of nonlinearly-coupled ODEs solvable
by algebraic operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
4. A differential algorithm to evaluate all the zeros of a generic
polynomial of arbitrary degree. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9
5. Extensions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11

A2. Integrable nonlinear PDEs on the half-line. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .15

A S Fokas and B Pelloni

1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .15
2. Transforms and Riemann-Hilbert problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
3. The structure of integrable PDEs: Lax pair formulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
4. An integral transform for nonlinear boundary value problems . . . . . . . . 26
5. Further considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37

A3. Detecting discrete integrability: the singularity approach . . . . . . . 44

B Grammaticos, A Ramani, R Willox and T Mase

1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
2. Singularity confinement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
3. The full-deautonomisation approach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
4. Halburd’s exact calculation of the degree growth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
5. Singularities and spaces of initial conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64

i i

i i
 i i

i i

vi Contents

A4. Elementary introduction to discrete soliton equations . . . . . . . . . . . 74

J Hietarinta

1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74
2. Basic set-up for lattice equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74
3. Symmetries and hierarchies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77
4. Lax pairs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80
5. Continuum limits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82
6. Discretizing a continuous equation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85
7. Integrability test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91
8. Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92

A5. New results on integrability of the Kahan-Hirota-Kimura

discretizations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94

Yu B Suris and M Petrera

1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94
2. General properties of the Kahan-Hirota-Kimura discretization . . . . . . . 96
3. Novel observations and results. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .96
4. The general Clebsch flow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99
5. The first Clebsch flow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104
6. The Kirchhoff case . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113
7. Lagrange top . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116
8. Concluding remarks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117

Part B: Solution Methods and Solution Structures

B1. Dynamical systems satisfied by special polynomials and related
isospectral matrices defined in terms of their zeros . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122

O Bihun

1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122
2. Zeros of generalized hypergeometric polynomial with two
parameters and zeros of Jacobi polynomials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127
3. Zeros of generalized hypergeometric polynomials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133
4. Zeros of generalized basic hypergeometric polynomials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136
5. Zeros of Wilson and Racah polynomials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141
6. Zeros of Askey-Wilson and q-Racah polynomials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 147

i i

i i
 i i

i i

Contents vii

7. Discussion and Outlook . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154

B2. Singularity methods for meromorphic solutions of

differential equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159

R Conte, T W Ng and C F Wu

1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159
2. A simple pedagogical example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163
3. Lessons from this pedagogical example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 167
4. Another characterization of elliptic solutions:
the subequation method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 169
5. An alternative to the Hermite decomposition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 172
6. The important case of amplitude equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 173
7. Nondegenerate elliptic solutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 179
8. Degenerate elliptic solutions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .180
9. Current challenges and open problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 182

B3. Pfeiffer-Sato solutions of Buhl’s problem and a

Lagrange-D’Alembert principle for heavenly equations . . . . . . . . . . 187

O E Hentosh, Ya A Prykarpatsky, D Blackmore and A Prykarpatski

1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 187
2. Lax–Sato compatible systems of vector field equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 190
3. Heavenly equations: Lie-algebraic integrability scheme . . . . . . . . . . . . . 195
4. Integrable heavenly dispersionless equations: Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . 199
5. Lie-algebraic structures and heavenly dispersionless systems . . . . . . . . 202
6. Linearization covering method and its applications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 207
7. Contact geometry linearization covering scheme . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 215
8. Integrable heavenly superflows: Their Lie-algebraic structure . . . . . . . 217
9. Integrability and the Lagrange–d’Alembert principle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 222

B4. Superposition formulae for nonlinear integrable equations in

bilinear form . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 233

X B Hu

1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 233
2. Bianchi theorem of permutability and superposition formula
of the KdV equation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 235
3. Superposition formulae for a variety of soliton equations
with examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 237

i i

i i
 i i

i i

viii Contents

4. Superposition formulae for rational solutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 247

5. Superposition formulae for some other particular solutions . . . . . . . . . 252

B5. Matrix solutions for equations of the AKNS system . . . . . . . . . . . . . 257

C Schiebold

1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 257
2. An operator approach to integrable systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 259
3. The nc AKNS system . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 263
4. Solution formulas for the AKNS system . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 265
5. Projection techniques revisited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 268
6. Matrix- and vector-AKNS systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 269
7. Reduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 272
8. The finite-dimensional case. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 273
9. Solitons, strongly bound solitons (breathers), degeneracies . . . . . . . . . . 278
10. Multiple pole solutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 282
11. Solitons of matrix- and vector-equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 287

B6. Algebraic traveling waves for the generalized KdV-Burgers

equation and the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .295

C Valls

1. Introduction and statement of the main results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 295

2. Proof of Theorem 2 and some preliminary results. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .299
3. Proof of Theorem 3 with n = 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 301
4. Proof of Theorem 3 with n = 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 307
5. Final comments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 313

Part C: Symmetry Methods for Nonlinear Systems

C1. Nonlocal invariance of the multipotentialisations of the
Kupershmidt equation and its higher-order hierarchies . . . . . . . . . 317

M Euler and N Euler

1. Introduction: symmetry-integrable equations and

multipotentialisations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 317
2. The multipotentialisation of the Kupershmidt equation . . . . . . . . . . . . . 327
3. Invariance of the Kupershmidt equation and its chain
of potentialisations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 333

i i

i i
 i i

i i

Contents ix

4. The hierarchies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 338

5. Concluding remarks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 342
Appendix A: A list of recursion operators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 343
Appendix B: An equation that does not potentialise . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 348

C2. Geometry of normal forms for dynamical systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 352

G Gaeta

1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 352
2. Normal forms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 354
3. Normal forms and symmetry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 356
4. Michel theory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 358
5. Unfolding of normal forms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 360
6. Normal forms in the presence of symmetry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 364
7. Normal forms and classical Lie groups . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 365
8. Finite normal forms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 368
9. Gradient property. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .369
10. Spontaneous linearization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 370
11. Discussion and conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 371
Appendix A: The normal forms construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 373
Appendix B: Examples of unfolding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 376
Appendix C: Hopf and Hamiltonian Hopf bifurcations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 379
Appendix D: Symmetry and convergence for normal forms . . . . . . . . . 381

C3. Computing symmetries and recursion operators of

evolutionary super-systems using the SsTools environment . . . . 390

A V Kiselev, A O Krutov and T Wolf

1. Notation and definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 391

2. Symmetries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 393
3. Recursions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 396
4. Nonlocalities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 399

C4. Symmetries of Itô stochastic differential equations and their

applications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 408

R Kozlov

1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 408
2. Illustrating example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 409

i i

i i
 i i

i i

x Contents

3. Itô SDEs and Lie point symmetries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 410

4. Properties of symmetries of Itô SDEs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 413
5. Symmetry applications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 420

C5. Statistical symmetries of turbulence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 437

M Oberlack, M Waclawczyk and V Grebenev

1. Foreword . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 437
2. Stochastic behavior and symmetries of differential equations
- an introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 438
3. Statistics of the Navier-Stokes equations and its symmetries . . . . . . . . 444
4. Summary and outlook . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 464

Part D: Nonlinear Systems in Applications

D1. Integral transforms and ordinary differential equations of
infinite order . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 468

A Chavez, H Prado and E G Reyes

1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 468
2. Differential operators of infinite order in mathematics
and physics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 470
3. Mathematical theory for nonlocal equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 473
4. The operator f (∂t ) : Lp (R+ ) −→ H q (C+ ). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .478
5. The initial value problem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 483
6. From the Laplace to the Borel transform . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 488
7. Linear zeta-nonlocal field equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 492
8. Future work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 495

D2. The role of nonlinearity in geostrophic ocean flows

on a sphere . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 500

A Constantin and R S Johnson

1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 500
2. Preliminaries. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .501
3. Governing equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 501
4. Geostrophy and the f - and β-plane approximations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 503
5. Geostrophy in spherical coordinates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 510

i i

i i
 i i

i i

Contents xi

6. Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 516

D3. Review of results on a system of type many predators

- one prey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 520

A V Osipov and G Söderbacka

1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 520
2. Lotka-Volterra equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 521
3. Rosenzweig-McArthur equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 523
4. Mathematical tools . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 524
5. Systems with more predators. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .528
6. Modified standard system . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 537

D4. Ermakov-type systems in nonlinear physics and continuum

mechanics. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .541

C Rogers and W K Schief

1. Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 541
2. A rotating shallow water system. Ermakov-Ray-Reid reduction . . . . . 544
3. Hamiltonian Ermakov-Ray-Reid reduction in
magneto-gasdynamics. The pulsrodon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 548
4. Hamiltonian Ermakov-Ray-Reid systems. Parametrisation
and integration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 553
5. Multi-component Ermakov systems. Genesis in N -layer
hydrodynamics. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .555
6. Multi-component Ermakov and many-body system connections . . . . . 559
7. Multi-component Ermakov-Painlevé systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 562

Subject Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 577

i i

i i
 i i

i i

i i

i i
 i i

i i

Preface
The aim of this book is to provide a comprehensive account of the state of the art on
the mathematical description of nonlinear systems. The book consists of 20 invited
contributions written by leading experts in different aspects of nonlinear systems
that include ordinary and partial differential equations, difference equations and
q-difference equations, discrete or lattice equations, non-commutative and matrix
equations, stochastic equations, as well as supersymmetric equations. The contents
is divided into four main parts, namely Part A: Integrable Systems, Part B: So-
lution Methods and Solution Structures, Part C: Symmetry Methods of Nonlinear
Systems, and Part D: Nonlinear Systems in Applications. Below we give a short
description of each contribution.
Part A consists of five contributions, numbered A1 to A5. In this part the au-
thors mainly address the fundamental question of how to detect integrable systems.
In A1 the author F Calogero describes a somewhat novel technique to identify non-
linear systems of differential equations solvable by algebraic operations. In A2 the
authors A S Fokas and B Pelloni give a comprehensive review of the so-called Fokas
Method to solve initial-boundary value problems applied to nonlinear partial differ-
ential equations on the half-line. In A3 the authors B Grammaticos, A Ramani, R
Willox and T Mase describe how to detect discrete integrability by the singularity
approach; the singularities of which arise for second order rational mappings. In A4
the author J Hietarinta provides an elementary introduction to discrete or lattice
soliton equations, where a multidimensional setting is discussed in some detail. In
the last contribution of this section, namely A5, the authors Yu B Suris and M Pe-
trera discuss new results of the Hahan-Hirota-Kimura discretizations and provide,
amongst other things, the integrals of motion.
Part B makes up the largest part of the book and consists of six contributions,
numbered B1 to B6. Here the authors describe different methods by which to ob-
tain explicit solutions of nonlinear systems and/or describe the solution structures
of the systems. In B1 the author O Bihun discusses a general method to construct
isospectral matrices that are defined in terms of the zeros of certain polynomials. It
is shown, amongst other things, how this leads to solvable nonlinear first-order ordi-
nary differential systems. In B2 the authors R Conte, T W Ng and C F Wu provide
a tutorial introduction to methods that were recently developed by the authors in
order to find all meromorphic particular solutions of nonintegrable, autonomous,
algebraic ordinary differential equations of any order. Some examples in physics
are given. In B3 the authors O E Hentosh , Ya A Prykarpatsky, D Blackmore and
A Prykarpatski give a review to the Buhl compatible vector field equation problem
by emphasizing its Pfeiffer and Lax–Sato type solutions. They furthermore ana-
lyze the related Lie-algebraic structures and integrability of the so-called heavenly
equations. An interesting related Lagrange–d’Alembert principle is also discussed
in this contribution, as well as other related aspects. In B4 the author X B Hu
is concerned with superposition formulae and Bianchi identities that are related
to bilinear Bäcklund transformations for nonlinear integrable equations in bilinear
xiii

i i

i i
 i i

i i

xiv Preface

form. The author utilizes this to generate soliton solutions, rational solutions as
well as some other special solutions to some nonlinear integrable equations. Many
examples are provided. In B5 the author C Schiebold constructs m × n-matrix
valued solutions for the AKNS system. A complete asymptotic description is given
for multiple pole solutions, including wave packets of weakly bound breathers. The
collision of vector solitons is also studied. In B6 the author C Valls uses a new
method, recently introduced by A Gasull and H Giacomini, to characterize all trav-
eling wave solutions of the Generalized Korteweg-de-Vries-Burgers equation as well
as for the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation.
In Part C the authors concentrate on symmetry methods for nonlinear systems.
It consists of five contributions, numbered C1 to C5. In C1 the authors M Euler
and N Euler describe the multipotentialization process by which it is possible to
construct nonlocal invariance of certain nonlinear symmetry-integrable evolution
equations in 1 + 1 dimensions. A complete account of this process for the fifth-order
Kupershmidt equation and its hierarchies is given. In C2 the author G Gaeta dis-
cusses several aspects of the geometry of vector fields in (Poincaré-Dulac) normal
form. This relies substantially on Michel theory. The case, common in physics, of
systems enjoying an a priori symmetry is also discussed in some detail. In C3 the
authors A V Kiselev, A O Krutov and T Wolf provide an informal discussion of
the step-by-step computation of nonlocal recursions for symmetry algebras of non-
linear coupled boson-fermion N = 1 supersymmetric systems by using the SsTools
environment. In C4 the author R Kozlov discusses Lie point symmetries of Itô
stochastic differential equations, which correspond to Lie group transformations of
the independent variable (time) and dependent variables that preserve the differ-
ential form of the equations and the properties of Brownian motion. In C5 the
authors M Oberlack, M Waclawczyk and V Grebenev describe the so-called statis-
tical symmetries of turbulence and discuss their importance in understanding the
statistics of turbulence such as intermittency and non-gaussianity.
Part D provides some of the applications of nonlinear systems. This part con-
sists of four contributions, numbered D1 to D4. In D1 the authors A Chávez, H
Prado and E G Reyes review their work on integral transforms for ordinary differ-
ential equations of infinite order and apply the theory to equations defined with
the help of the Riemann zeta function which are of interest in modern theoretical
physics. In D2 the authors A Constantin and R S Johnson discuss the rôle of non-
linearity in geostrophic ocean flows on a sphere and point out some of its challenges.
In D3 the authors A V Osipov and G Söderbacka give a review of their results on
a class of systems of the type n predators - one prey. They also discuss, amongst
other things, the extinction and different simple and complicated coexistence of
the predators. In D4 the authors C Rogers and W K Schief discuss Ermakov-type
systems in nonlinear physics and continuum mechanics. They describe applications
in rotating shallow water theory, magnetogasdynamics, multi-layer hydrodynam-
ics and many-body theory. The authors also review their recent work on hybrid
Ermakov-Painlevé systems.
Norbert Euler (Luleå, 3 July 2018)

i i

i i
 i i

i i

The Authors

1. Oksana Bihun, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs, USA [B1]

2. Denis Blackmore, New Jersey Institute of Technology, USA [B3]

3. Francesco Calogero, University of Rome, La Sapienza, Italy [A1]

4. Alan Chávez, Universidad Nacional de Trujillo, Perú [D1]

5. Adrian Constantin, Universität Wien, Austria [D2]

6. Robert Conte, École normale supérieure de Cachan, CNRS, Université

Paris-Saclay, France [B2]

7. Marianna Euler, Luleå University of Technology, Sweden [C1]

8. Norbert Euler, Luleå University of Technology, Sweden [C1]

9. Thanasis Fokas, University of Cambridge, UK [A2]

10. Giuseppe Gaeta, Università degli Studi di Milano, Italy [C2]

11. Basil Grammaticos, Université Paris VII & XI, France [A3]

12. Vladimir Grebenev, Institute of Computational Technologies, Russian

Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia [C5]

13. Oksana E Hentosh, Institute for Applied Problems of Mechanics and

Mathematics at the NAS, Lviv, Ukraine [B3]

14. Jarmo Hietarinta, University of Turku, Turku, Finland [A4]

15. Xing-biao Hu, LSEC, Institute of Computational Mathematics Chinese

Academy of Sciences, China [B4]

16. Robin S Johnson, Newcaste University, UK [D2]

17. Arthemy V Kiselev, University of Groningen, The Netherlands [C3]

18. Roman Kozlov, Norwegian School of Economics, Bergen, Norway [C4]

19. Andrey O Krutov, Independent University of Moscow, Russia [C3]

20. Takafumi Mase, University of Tokyo, Japan [A3]

21. Tuen Wai Ng, The University of Hong Kong, China [B2]

22. Martin Oberlack, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Germany [C5]

23. Alexandr V Osipov, University of Saint Peterburg, Russia [D3]

xv

i i

i i
 i i

i i

xvi The Authors

24. Beatrice Pelloni, Heriot-Watt University, United Kingdom [A2]

25. Matteo Petrera, Technische Universität Berlin, Germany [A5]

26. Humberto Prado, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Chile [D1]

27. Anatolij Prykarpatski, Polytechnical University, Krakow, Poland [B3]

28. Yarema A Prykarpatsky, University of Agriculture Krakow, Poland [B3]

29. Alfred Ramani, Université Paris VII & XI, France [A3]

30. Enrique G Reyes, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Chile [D1]

31. Colin Rogers, University of New South Wales, Australia [D4]

32. Cornelia Schiebold, Mid Sweden University, Sweden [B5]

33. Wolfgang Schief, University of New South Wales, Australia [D4]

34. Gunnar Söderbacka, Åbo Akademi, Finland [D3]

35. Yuri B Suris, Technische Universität Berlin, Germany [A5]

36. Claudia Valls, Técnico Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal [B6]

37. Marta Waclawczyk, University of Warsaw, Poland [C5]

38. Ralph Willox, University of Tokyo, Japan [A3]

39. Thomas Wolf, Brock University, Canada [C3]

40. Chengfa Wu, Shenzhen University, China [B2]

i i

i i
 i i

i i

A1. Systems of nonlinearly-coupled differential

equations solvable by algebraic operations
Francesco Calogero

Physics Department, University of Rome ”La Sapienza”

Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Roma 1, Italy

Abstract
In this paper an overview is provided of an approach to identify systems
of nonlinearly-coupled Ordinary Differential Equations solvable by algebraic
operations— also including models interpretable as many-body problems with
Newtonian equations of motion (”accelerations equal forces”). This technique—
which was introduced several decades ago—has had an important evolution re-
cently. This development entails that the universe of solvable models thereby
generated is quite vast; it also includes dynamical systems which feature non-
trivially rather simple time evolutions, for instance isochronous or asymptot-
ically isochronous. In this paper this development is tersely described and
representative examples of the solvable models thereby obtained are exhibited
and tersely discussed. A differential algorithm to evaluate all the zeros of a
generic polynomial of arbitrary degree is also reported. Extensions of this ap-
proach to systems of nonlinearly-coupled Partial Differential Equations and to
evolutions in ”discrete time” are tersely mentioned.

1 Introduction
Four decades ago the idea was introduced to identify nonlinearly-coupled systems
of Ordinary Differential Equations (ODEs) amenable to exact treatments by in-
vestigating the motion of zeros and poles of special solutions of solvable partial
differential equations [1]. This idea led to many developments; see for instance the
relevant chapters in the two books [2] [3] and references therein. Recently a new
twist of this idea has emerged [4]; this breakthrough, and some of its developments
(see for instance [5] and the last section of the present paper), have vastly expanded
the identification of dynamical systems solvable by algebraic operations: see [6] and
references therein. In this paper we provide a terse overview of these findings.

2 The main idea and some key identities

Let pN (z; t) be a generic t-dependent monic polynomial of arbitrary degree N in
the (complex ) variable z:

N
X N
 Y
pN (z; t) = z N + ym (t) z N −m =

[z − xn (t)] . (2.1)
m=1 n=1
1

i i

i i
 i i

i i

2 F Calogero

Notation 2-1. Above and hereafter N is an arbitrary positive integer (N ≥ 2); t

is a real parameter (generally interpretable as time in the context of more physical
applications such as the identification and investigation of many-body problems
characterized by Newtonian equations of motion, ”accelerations equal forces”; or,
as a dimensionless parameter in purely mathematical contexts); the N (generally
complex ) numbers ym (t) are the coefficients of the polynomial pN (z; t) and the N
(generally complex ) numbers xn (t) are the zeros of this polynomial. Indices such as
n, m, ` always run (unless otherwise indicated) over all positive integers from 1 to
N . The N coefficients ym are in the following, occasionally, collectively identified
as the N components of the N -vector ~y ; and the N zeros xn as the N elements
of the unordered set x̃. Note that here we omitted to indicate the t-dependence of
these quantities; this we shall often do in the following, whenever such omissions are
unlikely to cause misunderstandings. Finally, let us mention that in the following
superimposed dots denote time differentiations, for instance ẋn ≡ dxn (t) /dt. 
The two equalities in (2.1) indicate that the polynomial pN (z; t) can be defined
either by assigning its N coefficients ym (t) or its N zeros xn (t); and they imply
that the N coefficients ym (t) can be expressed in terms of the N zeros xn (t) via the
well-known formulas

ym = (−1)m σm (x̃) (2.2a)

where
X
σm (x̃) = (x`1 x`2 · · · x`m ) (2.2b)
1≤`1 <`2 ···`m ≤N

is the symmetrical sum of degree m of the N components xn of the unordered set

x̃; so that, in particular,
N
X N
Y
σ1 (x̃) = (xn ) , σN (x̃) = (xn ) . (2.2c)
n=1 n=1

·
Likewise the t-derivative ẏm (t) can be explicitly expressed in terms of x̃ (t) and x̃ (t)
by t-differentiating these formulas.
On the other hand the zeros xn —while being uniquely determined, up to permu-
tations, whenever the N coefficients ym are themselves assigned—cannot be gener-
ally expressed in terms of the coefficients by explicit formulas, unless N ≤ 4. Never-
theless, for all values of N the fact that this transition from the N coefficients ym (t)
to the zeros xn (t) is an algebraic operation has important implications: for instance
if the time evolution of the N coefficients ym (t) is isochronous with period T —i. e.
ym (t+T ) = ym (t) for all (or almost all) assignments of initial data—then
 clearly the
evolution of the corresponding zeros is also isochronous, xn t + T̃ = xn (t); albeit
with a period T̃ which is generally an integer multiple of the period T , T̃ = νT ,
with the integer ν in the range 1 ≤ ν ≤ νMax (N ) (for a clear discussion of this
question, including bounds and estimates of the maximal value νMax (N ), see [7]).

i i

i i
 i i

i i

A1. Nonlinearly-coupled differential equations solvable by algebraic operations 3

And analogous results obtain of course in the case of asymptotic isochrony (for this
notion see for instance [8]).
It is as well evident that if the time evolution of the N coefficients ym (t) is Hamil-
tonian, the time evolution of the N coefficients xn (t) is also Hamiltonian—although
it might not be possible to write explicitly the corresponding Hamiltonian nor the
canonical momenta conjugated to the canonical coordinates xn (t); and likewise if
the time evolution of the N coefficients ym (t) is Hamiltonian and integrable, the
corresponding time evolution of the N coefficients xn (t) is also Hamiltonian and
integrable.
The main idea to identify systems of N nonlinearly-coupled ODEs solvable by
algebraic operations is to consider solvable time evolutions of the N coefficients
ym (t) of a t-dependent polynomial and to then focus on the corresponding evolution
of the N zeros xn (t) of that polynomial (see (2.1)); by taking advantage of the fact
that the transition from the N zeros xn to the N coefficients ym of a polynomial
is given by explicit formulas, and the inverse transition from the N coefficients
ym to the N zeros xn of a polynomial by algebraic operations (see above). The
solvable character of the t-evolution of the N coefficients ym (t) might be simple
enough to yield an explicit solution, as would for instance be the case for a system
of N linear autonomous decoupled ODEs; or the solution might itself be achieved
by algebraic operations—such as, say, the evaluation of the N eigenvalues of an
explicitly known N ⊗ N matrix—as it would be the case for a system of N linearly-
coupled autonomous ODEs. Note that, even when the time evolution of the N
coefficients ym (t) is characterized by linear ODEs, the corresponding evolution of
the N zeros is generally quite nonlinear.
Clearly to implement this idea one needs to find an explicit way to transform
the evolution ODEs satisfied by the N coefficients ym (t) into the corresponding
ODEs satisfied by the N zeros xn (t) . Indeed, a simple way to do so provided
the foundation for the results reported in [1] and subsequently largely exploited to
identify and investigate algebraically solvable models characterized by nonlinearly-
coupled systems of ODEs; see for instance [2] [3] and references therein. But it was
restricted to the case in which the system of ODEs satisfied by the N coefficients
ym (t) had an essentially linear character.
Recently a—remarkably simple—way to bypass this important restriction was
noted [4]. It is provided by the following key identities:

h i
PN N −m
− m=1 ẏm (xn )
ẋn = QN (2.3a)
`=1,`6=n (xn − x` )
∂pN (z;t)
− ∂t z=xn
= QN , (2.3b)
`=1,`6=n (xn − x` )

i i

i i
 i i

i i

4 F Calogero

h i
N
PN N −m
X 
2ẋn ẋ`

m=1 ÿ m (xn )
ẍn = − QN (2.4a)
xn − x` `=1,`6=n (xn − x` )
`=1, `6=n
∂ 2 pN (z;t)
N  
X 2ẋn ẋ` ∂t2 z=xn
= − QN . (2.4b)
xn − x` `=1,`6=n (xn − x` )
`=1, `6=n

Remark 2-1. The proofs of these 2 identities are so simple that we do not
feel the need to detail them here: they obtain by (partially) t-differentiating, once
respectively twice, the 2 expressions in the right-hand side of (2.1), and then setting
z = xn (t). Readers who like to see these proofs are referred to the literature [4] [5]
[6], where they will also find the generalization of these identities to t-differentiations
of higher order than 2.
And let us report here, for future reference, the following additional relations
obviously implied by (2.1):
N h i
ym (xn )N −m = − (xn )N . 
X
(2.5)
m=1

Clearly these identities open the way to the explicit transformation of systems
of ODEs satisfied by the N coefficients ym (t) to systems of ODEs satisfied by the
N zeros xn (t). For instance, let the N coefficients ym (t) satisfy the system of
first-order ODEs
·
~y = f~ (~y ; t) , ẏm (t) = fm (~y (t) ; t) , (2.6a)

with N assigned functions fm (~y ; t) (the N components of the N -vector f~ (~y ; t)).
Then clearly the identity (2.3) implies that the N zeros xn (t) satisfy the following
system of ODEs:
 −1
N N h i
fm (~y ; t) (xn )N −m .
Y X
ẋn = −  (xn − x` ) (2.6b)
`=1, `6=n m=1

In this system (2.6b) of ODEs for the N dependent variables xn (t) the N compo-
nents ym (t) of the N -vector ~y (t) are of course supposed to be replaced by their
explicit expressions (2.2) in terms of the N zeros x` (t).
It is plain how the same procedure allows to transform a system of second-order
ODEs satisfied by the ym (t)’s into a system of second-order ODEs satisfied by the
xn (t)’s—via the identities (2.3) and (2.4), as well as (2.2) and (if need be) their
time-derivatives.
Let us conclude this section by spelling out—obvious as this might be—the solv-
able character via algebraic operations of a system of nonlinearly coupled ODEs
such as (2.6b). We assume of course that the input—in addition to this explicit sys-
tem of ODEs—is the assignment of the N initial data xn (0). The first step is then

i i

i i
 i i

i i

A1. Nonlinearly-coupled differential equations solvable by algebraic operations 5

to compute—via the explicit formulas (2.2) (at t = 0)—the explicit values of the N
initial values ym (0). The second step is to evaluate the quantities ym (t) by solving
the system of ODEs (2.6a), starting from the N values ym (0) evaluated in the first
step; note that we are assuming that this second step can be performed by algebraic
operations (or possibly even explicitly). The third step is to evaluate the N quan-
tities xn (t) by finding the N zeros of the polynomial, see (2.1), the N coefficients
ym (t) of which have been computed in the second step; note that this is indeed an
algebraic operation (which may be explicitly performed for N ≤ 4; although the
relevant formulas are complicated enough to be hardly useful for N > 2).
Remark 2-2. An important aspect of the procedure we just described needs
to be emphasized. Because in the last step the quantities xn (t) are identified as
the N zeros of a (known) t-dependent polynomial, see (2.1), they get defined as
an unordered set x̃ (t) of N (generally complex ) numbers. Hence the information
is lost of which one of these N numbers xn (t) is, say, the solution x1 (t) which has
evolved—generally continuously over time—from the specific initial datum x1 (0).
In certain cases, this might be irrelevant: for instance, if the quantities xn (t) are the
coordinates of N indistinguishable point particles moving in the complex plane (or,
equivalently, in the real Cartesian plane); then only the evolution of the unordered
set x̃ (t) is relevant. Otherwise the identification of each of the xn (t)’s as they evolve
over time can only be obtained by following their (generally continuous) evolution
over time; or, in a more practical context, by breaking up that evolution—from the
initial (t = 0) time to the actual time t—into subintervals: say, from τ` to τ`+1
with τ` < τ`+1 , τ1 = 0, τL = t, with appropriate assignments, of the integer L
and of the L positive numbers τ` , adequate to guarantee that the identification of
the quantities xn (t) obtain by an argument of contiguity (of xn (τ` ) to xn (τ`+1 )),
unambiguously approximating continuity. 
Let us however emphasize that—in spite of the limitation described in this Re-
mark 2-2—certain general properties (say, isochrony or integrability; as discussed
above) of the dynamical systems identified via the technique described above—see
for instance (2.6b)—might be sufficient to single them out as interesting models,
worthy of study in theoretical or applicative contexts.

3 Two examples of systems of nonlinearly-coupled

ODEs solvable by algebraic operations
Since in this paper we are mainly interested in illustrating the main idea of our
approach to identify systems of nonlinearly-coupled ODEs solvable by algebraic
operations, we restrict our presentation in this section to the exhibition of just
two, very simple, examples of such systems, characterized by equations of motion
of first, respectively of second, order. The interested reader may find many more
examples—less elementary than those displayed below—in the book [6] and in the
papers referred to there.
Notation 3-1. In the following examples—trying to economize words—we re-
port first the ODEs satisfied by the N coefficients ym (t) and their solutions, then

i i

i i
 i i

i i

6 F Calogero

the corresponding systems of nonlinearly-coupled ODEs satisfied by the N zeros

xn (t)—which are the models of interest—and finally we tersely provide some com-
ments. Hereafter the parameters ωm and αm (possibly decorated with additional
symbols, see below) are a priori arbitrary real numbers; occasionally we will as-
sume that the parameters ωm are rational numbers (up to an arbitrary common
real nonvanishing parameter ω),
 
pm
ωm = ω, (3.7)
qm
with the qm ’s positive integers and the pm ’s nonvanishing integers. i is throughout
the imaginary unit, i2 = −1. 

3.1 A solvable system of first-order nonlinearly-coupled ODEs

ẏm = (iωm − αm ) ym , (3.8a)
ym (t) = ym (0) exp [(iωm − αm ) t] . (3.8b)
 −1
N N h i
(−1)m+1 (iωm − αm ) σm (x̃) (xn )N −m . (3.9)
Y X
ẋn =  (xn − x` ) 
`=1,`6=n m=1

The solution of the equations of motions (3.9) is of course provided by the N

zeros xn (t) of the polynomial pN (z; t) the N coefficients ym (t) of which are given by
the explicit formulas (3.8b). Hence their time evolution is isochronous, respectively
asymptotically isochronous, if all the parameters ωm are rational numbers, and all
the parameters αm vanish, respectively none of the parameters αm is negative,
at least one of them is positive and at least one of them vanishes: so that the
polynomial pN (z; t) with coefficients (3.8b) is itself isochronous, pN (z; t + T ) =
pN (z; t) with
 
2π
T = Q , Q = max [qm ] , (3.10)
ω m=1,2,...,N

respectively it features this property only asymptotically, i. e. up to corrections

which vanish (exponentially) as t → ∞.
In the special case with N = 2 the system of ODEs (3.9) reads as follows:
ẋ1 = − (x1 − x2 )−1 [(α1 − iω1 ) x1 + (α − iω) x2 ] x1 ,
ẋ2 = (x1 − x2 )−1 [(α1 − iω1 ) x2 + (α − iω) x1 ] x2 ,
α ≡ α1 − α2 , ω ≡ ω1 − ω2 . (3.11)
In the special case with N = 3 the system of ODEs (3.9) reads as follows:
h
−1
ẋn = [(xn − xn+1 ) (xn − xn+2 )] (iω1 − α1 ) (x1 + x2 + x3 ) (xn )2
− (iω2 − α2 ) (x1 x2 + x2 x3 + x3 x1 ) xn + (iω3 − α3 ) x1 x2 x3 ] ,
n = 1, 2, 3 mod(3) . (3.12)

i i

i i
 i i

i i

A1. Nonlinearly-coupled differential equations solvable by algebraic operations 7

3.2 A solvable system of second-order nonlinearly-coupled ODEs:

the goldfish
h    i
(+) (−) (+) (−)
ÿm = i ωm + ωm − αm + αm ẏm
h  i
(+) (−) (+) (−) (+) (−) (−) (+)
+ αm αm − ωm ωm − i αm ωm + α m ωm ym , (3.13a)

   
ym (t) = a(+)
m exp iλ (+)
m t + a (−)
m exp iλ (−)
m t ,
ẏm (0) − λ(∓) ym (0)
a(±)
m = (+) (−)
, λ(±) (±) (±)
m = iωm − αm . (3.13b)
λm − λm
 −1
N   N
X 2ẋn ẋ` Y
ẍn = − (xn − x` ) ·
xn − x`
`=1, `6=n `=1,`6=n
N
X hnh    i
(+) (−) (+) (−)
· i ωm + ωm − αm + αm ẏm
m=1
h  i o i
(+) (−)
+ ωm (+) (−)
ωm − αm (+) (−)
αm + i ωm (−) (+)
αm + ωm αm ym (xn )N −m (3.14)
.

(±) (±)
In these formulas ωm and αm are real parameters (analogous to those introduced
above without the additional upper decoration); and of course in the equations
of motion (3.14) the quantities ym (t) (respectively ẏm (t)) are supposed to be re-
placed by their expressions (2.2) (respectively their time-derivatives) in terms of the
dependent variables xn (t) (and their time derivatives).
Note that these equations can be interpreted as the Newtonian equations of
motions (”accelerations equal forces”) of N unit mass point-particles moving in the
complex x-plane (or equivalently in the real Cartesian plane with coordinates Re (x)
and Im (x)).
We leave to the interested reader the analysis—analogous to that reported in Sec-
tion 3.1—of the cases in which these dynamical systems are isochronous or asymp-
totically isochronous.
(±) (±)
Note that, in the special case in which the parameters ωm and αm are restricted
to satisfy the conditions
(+) (−) (+) (−)
ωm + ωm = Ω, αm + αm =α, (3.15a)
(+) (−) (+) (−) (+) (−) (−) (+)
αm αm − ωm ωm = A , αm ωm + α m ωm = B , (3.15b)
with Ω, α, A, B real parameters—independent of the parameter m—the equations
of motion (3.14) get, via the identities (2.4) and (2.5), drastically simplified, reading
 −1
N   N
X 2ẋn ẋ` Y
ẍn = + (iΩ − α) ẋn + (A − iB)  (xn − x` ) (xn )N .
xn − x`
`=1, `6=n `=1,`6=n

i i

i i
 i i

i i

8 F Calogero

(3.15c)
(+) (−) (+) (−)
In the even more special case with ωm = Ω, ωm = αm = αm = 0 implying
α = A = B = 0 these equations of motion simplify even more, reading
N  
X 2ẋn ẋ`
ẍn = iΩẋn + ; (3.16)
xn − x`
`=1, `6=n

while the corresponding equations for the ym (t)’s read

ÿm = iΩẏm , (3.17a)

so that the solution of their initial-values problem reads simply

 
exp (iΩt) − 1
ym (t) = ym (0) + ẏm (0) . (3.17b)
iΩ
It is then easily seen that the solution of the initial-values problem for the system
of nonlinearly-coupled Newtonian ODEs (3.16) is given by the following neat pre-
scription: the values of the N coordinates xn (t) are the N solutions of the following
neat equation in the independent variable z:
N  
X ẋn (0) iΩ
= . (3.18)
z − xn (0) exp (iΩt) − 1
n=1

Note that this is equivalent to the statement that the N coordinates xn (t) are the
N zeros of the polynomial equation Q of degree N in z that obtains by multiplying
this formula by the polynomial N `=1 [z − x` (0)].
Remark 3.2-1. The system of Newtonian equations of motion (3.16) features
several remarkable properties: it is invariant under an arbitrary rescaling of the time
variable (t ⇒ at with a an arbitrary real constant), under an arbitrary translation
of the coordinates (xn (t) ⇒ xn (t) + b with b an arbitrary complex constant), and
under an arbitrary rescaling of the coordinates (xn (t) ⇒ c xn (t) with c an arbitrary
complex constant). Moreover—as indicated by the invariance just mentioned, with
the assignment c = exp (iθ)—these equations of motion (3.16) are invariant under
rotations in the complex x-plane, so that they can be reformulated in covariant 2-
vector form via the transition from the complex x-plane to the real Cartesian plane
that obtains by introducing the real 2-vectors ~rn (t) ≡ (Re [xn (t)] , Im [xn (t)]) ; it
is indeed easily seen that they then read as follows,
 · ·  · ·  · ·

·· · N
X  ~rn ~r` · ~rn` + ~r` ~rn · ~rn` − ~rn` ~rn · ~r` 
~rn = Ω ẑ ∧ ~rn + 2 
2
 , (3.19)
`=1,`6=n
 (rn` ) 

where ẑ denotes the unit-vector orthogonal to the Cartesian plane, the symbol ∧
denotes the standard (3-dimensional) vector-product (so that, if ~r is a 2-vector in

i i

i i
 i i

i i

A1. Nonlinearly-coupled differential equations solvable by algebraic operations 9

the Cartesian plane, ẑ ∧ ~r is that same 2-vector rotated counterclockwise by π/2),

the dot sandwiched between two 2-vectors denotes the standard scalar product,
~rn` ≡ ~rn − ~r` and (rn` )2 ≡ ~rn` · ~rn` .
Because of this neatness—and the simplicity of its isochronous behavior, as also
demonstrated by its solution, see (3.18)—the name ”goldfish” was suggested when
this model was originally identified [9]; a name that seems to have caught on, see
for instance [7] (and several other references reported in [3] and [6]). 
Remark 3.2-2. The very simplest case of the goldfish model obtains when
Ω = 0, so that its equations of motion read
N  
X 2ẋn ẋ`
ẍn = , (3.20a)
xn − x`
`=1, `6=n

or, equivalently,
 · ·  · ·  · ·

·· N
X  ~rn ~r` · ~rn` + ~r` ~rn · ~rn` − ~rn` ~rn · ~r` 
~rn = 2   . (3.20b)

`=1,`6=n
(r )2 n`


In this case, of course, its behavior is not isochronous; but it is also rather remark-
able. The interested reader will find a detailed treatment in the book [2], see in
particular its Subsection 4.2.4, the title of which provides a glimpse of its contents:
”The simplest model: explicit solution (the game of musical chairs), Hamiltonian
structure”. 

4 A differential algorithm to evaluate all the zeros of a

generic polynomial of arbitrary degree
In this section we report a recent development [10] [11] [6] concerning a very old and
classical problem, that of computing the N zeros of a generic (monic) polynomial
PN (z) of arbitrary degree N in its argument z. This result is reported here because
of its close connection with the findings discussed in this paper, see in particular
Section 2.1
There are different variants of this result; in particular one based on a system
of first-order ODEs [10] [6] and one based on a system of second-order ODEs [11]
[6]. Here we report only the second version, which we consider more elegant. It is
detailed by the following
1
I like to thank Prof. Peter Olver for pointing out to me (at the SPT2018 Workshop, June
2018) that the differential algorithm to evaluate all the zeros of a generic polynomial described
in this Section 4 may be considered a special case of the more general and more sophisticated
“homotopy continuation technique” introduced over a decade ago to investigate the zeros of systems
of polynomials: see for instance A. J. Sommese and C. W. Wampler, Numerical Solution of Systems
of Polynomials Arising in Engineering and Science, World Scientific, Singapore, 2005, and the
literature referred to there.

i i

i i
 i i

i i

10 F Calogero

Proposition 4-1. Consider the following monic polynomial PN (z) defined in

terms of its N coefficients cm and featuring the N zeros zn :
N
X N
Y
N N −m


PN (z) = z + cm z = (z − zn ) . (4.21)
m=1 n=1

Introduce the system of N nonlinear differential equations

N  
X 2 ẋn ẋ`
ẍn = , (4.22)
xn − x`
`=1, `6=n

with the independent variable t playing the mathematical role of ”dimensionless

time”. And complement this system of ODEs with the following assignment of
initial data: (i) the N initial values xn (0) of the N coordinates xn (t) are arbitrary
(except for the restriction—motivated by eq. (4.23), see below—that they be all
different among themselves, xn (0) 6= x` (0) if n 6= `); (ii) the N initial values ẋn (0)
of the time-derivatives ẋn (t) of the coordinates xn (t) are given, in terms of the N
initial values xn (0) and of the polynomial PN (z) evaluated at the N initial values
xn (0), by the following formula:

−PN [xn (0)]

ẋn (0) = QN . (4.23)
`=1, `6=n [xn (0) − x` (0)]

Then integrate the system of second-order ODEs from t = 0 to t = 1; there thus

obtain the N zeros of the polynomial PN (z):

PN [xn (1)] = 0 , z̃ = x̃ (1) .  (4.24)

The proof of this result is an elementary application of the two identities (2.3)
and (2.4) to the specific t-dependent polynomial

N
Y
pN (z; t) = (1 − t) [z − xn (0)] + t PN (z) , (4.25)
n=1

which clearly interpolates linearly from the polynomial featuring the N arbitrary
zeros xn (0) (at t = 0) to the polynomial PN (z) at t = 1. It is indeed an elementary
task to verify that the N zeros xn (t) of this polynomial pN (z; t) feature the following
properties: (i) they are evidently consistent with the (arbitrary) assignment xn (0)
at t = 0, and with the formula (4.24) at t = 1; (ii) the t-derivative of this polynomial
pN (z; t) , evaluated at t = 0, is consistent (via (2.3)) with the assignment (4.23);
(iii) the linear dependence on t of this polynomial pN (z; t) implies that its second
t-derivative vanishes identically, hence, via the identity (2.4b), that its zeros xn (t)
evolve in time according to the simple system of ODEs (4.22). Q. E. D.
Remark 4-1. The alert reader will have noted that the system of ODEs (4.22)
coincides with the simplest version of the goldfish model, see Remark 3.2-2. 

i i

i i
 i i

i i

A1. Nonlinearly-coupled differential equations solvable by algebraic operations 11

Remark 4-2. Let us emphasize the remarkable flexibility of this algorithm

implied by the possibility to assign arbitrarily the N initial values xn (0). An ad-
ditional flexibility is provided by the possibility to rescale the independent variable
t, namely to replace t with a convenient monotonic function τ (t). The exploration
of these possibilities in the context of numerical analysis is an open task, as well as
the possibility to use this approach to investigate certain polynomial properties; for
an instance of applicative relevance see [12]. 
Remark 4-3. The generalization of this approach to the investigation of the
infinite set of zeros of entire functions is another interesting development [13]. 

5 Extensions
Various extensions of the approach described in this paper have been investigated:
(i) to the vistas opened by the possibility to iterate the procedure described above
(to identify algebraically solvable systems of nonlinearly-coupled ODEs via the tran-
sition from the time evolution of the N coefficients of a time-dependent polynomial
to that of its N zeros), and to thereby generate infinite hierarchies of such alge-
braically solvable systems [14]; (ii) to treat systems of PDEs rather than systems of
ODEs [15]; (iii) to evolutions in discrete time rather than continuous time [16]. All
these developments are reviewed in the book [6], where the interested reader will
also find additional references.
Finally, let us report—without detailing their (quite easy) proofs, see [17] and
[18]—some amusing twists (featuring a potential Diophantine connotation, see be-
low) of the findings reported in Section 4 and in [16].
Proposition 5-1. Consider the system of N nonlinearly coupled first-order
ODEs
N
Q N
Q
[xn (t) − xm (0)] − [xn (t) − fm ]
m=1 m=1
ẋn (t) = N
, (5.1a)
Q
[xn (t) − xm (t)]
m=1, m6=n

where the N initial (possibly complex ) values xn (0) of the dependent variables
xn (t) are assigned arbitrarily (but all different among themselves—xn (0) 6= xm (0)
if n 6= m—to avoid that the denominator in the right-hand side of (5.1a) vanish at
t = 0); and the N numbers fm are assigned arbitrarily.
Then the values xn (1) of the dependent variables xn (t) at t = 1 coincide—up
to permutations—with the N numbers fm ,
x̃ (1) = f˜ .  (5.1b)
Proposition 5-2. Consider the system of N second-order discrete-time evolu-
tion equations (with the integers ` now playing the role of discrete time)
N
Y N
Y
2 [zn (` + 2) − zm (` + 1)] − [zn (` + 2) − zm (`)] = 0 ; (5.2a)
m=1 m=1

i i

i i
 i i

i i

12 F Calogero

note that this formula provides the unordered set z̃ (` + 2), the elements of which
are the N values zn (` + 2), as the N zeros of the polynomial of degree N in z
defined in terms of the two unordered sets z̃ (`) and z̃ (` + 1) as follows:

N
Y N
Y
PN (z; z̃ (`) , z̃ (` + 1)) = 2 [z − zm (` + 1)] − [z − zm (`)] . (5.2b)
m=1 m=1

Let this system of second-order discrete-time evolution equations, (5.2a), be com-

plemented by the following assignments of the two unordered sets z̃ (0) respectively
z̃ (1) of 2N initial data zn (0) respectively zn (1): (i) the N data zn (0) are assigned
arbitrarily; (ii) the N data zn (1)—rather than being as well arbitrarily assigned—
are defined as follows in terms of the arbitrary positive integer parameter L, the
unordered set z̃ (0) , and the unordered set f˜ the N elements of which are N arbi-
trarily assigned numbers fm —by the N algebraic equations

N N
Y (−1)N Y
[zn (1) − zm (0)] + [zn (1) − fm ] = 0 ; (5.3a)
L−1
m=1 m=1


(1)
hence these N data zn (1) are the N roots of the polynomial pN z; z̃ (0) , f˜; L , of
degree N in z, defined as follows in terms of the two unordered sets z̃ (0) and f˜:

N N
(1)
  Y (−1)N Y
pN z; z̃ (0) , f˜; L = [z − zm (0)] + [z − fm ] . (5.3b)
L−1
m=1 m=1

Then, at ` = L, the solution z̃ (L) of the system of second-order discrete-time

evolution equations (5.2a) coincides with the unordered set f˜:

z̃ (L) = f˜ .  (5.4)

The Diophantine connotation of these findings obtains thanks to the possibility

to assign the N , a priori arbitrary, numbers fm to take integer values, for instance
to coincide with the N integers from 1 to N . Note that—especially with such
assignments—these findings might then be useful to test the accuracy of numerical
routines to integrate systems of ODEs (see (5.1a)), respectively to find the zeros of
polynomials of degree N (a task required in order to solve numerically, step by step,
the system of discrete-time evolution equations (5.2)); by comparing the outcome
of the numerical routines with the exact results predicted by Proposition 5-1
respectively Proposition 5-2.
Let us end by mentioning the generalization of the approach discussed in this
paper that emerges if the formula (2.1) is replaced by

N
X N
Y
pN (z; t) = z N + [ym (t) PN −m (z)] = [z − xn (t)] , (5.5)
m=1 n=1

i i

i i
 i i

i i

A1. Nonlinearly-coupled differential equations solvable by algebraic operations 13

where the N monic polynomials PN −m (z), of degree N −m, are arbitrarily assigned.
It is then easily seen that identities analogous to (2.3) and (2.4) still hold, reading

− N
P
[ẏm PN −m (xn )]
ẋn = Qm=1
N
(5.6a)
`=1,`6=n (xn − x` )
∂pN (z;t)
− ∂t z=xn
= QN , (5.6b)
`=1,`6=n (xn − x` )

N   PN
X 2ẋn ẋ` m=1 [ÿm PN −m (xn )]
ẍn = − N
(5.6c)
xn − x`
Q
`=1, `6=n `=1,`6=n (xn − x` )
∂ 2 pN (z;t)
N  
X 2ẋn ẋ` ∂t2 z=xn
= − QN . (5.6d)
xn − x` `=1,`6=n (x n − x` )
`=1, `6=n

However the ansatz (5.5) does not generally entail simple explicit expressions—
such as (2.2)—of the N quantities ym in terms of the N quantities xn . Relatively
explicit expressions of the N quantities ym in terms of the N quantities xn can
of course be obtained if the polynomials PN −m (z) were part of an orthogonal set,
but the resulting treatment would still be somewhat more complicated; it would on
the other hand allow the identification and investigation of new models solvable by
algebraic operations, including examples featuring additional free parameters and
yielding interesting properties—such as isochrony—which might hardly be guessed
by just looking at their equations of motion.

References
[1] F. Calogero, Motion of Poles and Zeros of Special Solutions of Nonlinear
and Linear Partial Differential Equations, and Related ”Solvable” Many Body
Problems, Nuovo Cimento 43B, 177-241 (1978).

[2] F. Calogero, Classical many-body problems amenable to exact treatments, Lec-

ture Notes in Physics Monograph m66, Springer, 2001 (749 pages).

[3] F. Calogero, Isochronous systems, Oxford University Press, 2008 (264 pages); a
marginally updated paperback edition has been published by OUP in Septem-
ber 2012.

[4] F. Calogero, New solvable variants of the goldfish many-body problem, Studies
Appl. Math. 137 (1), 123-139 (2016); DOI: 10.1111/sapm.12096.

[5] M. Bruschi and F. Calogero, A convenient expression of the time-derivative

(k)
zn (t) of arbitrary order k of the zero zn (t) of a time-dependent polynomial
pN (z; t) of arbitrary degree N in z, and solvable dynamical systems, J. Non-
linear Math. Phys. 23, 474-485 (2016).

i i

i i
 i i

i i

14 F Calogero

[6] F. Calogero, Zeros of Polynomials and Solvable Nonlinear Evolution Equations,

Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U. K., 2018.

[7] D. Gómez-Ullate and M. Sommacal, Periods of the goldfish many-body prob-

lem, J. Nonlinear Math. Phys.12 Suppl. 1, 351-362 (2005).

[8] F. Calogero and D. Gómez-Ullate, Asymptotically isochronous systems, J.

Nonlinear Math. Phys. 15, 410-426 (2008).

[9] F. Calogero, The ”neatest” many-body problem amenable to exact treatments

(a ”goldfish”?), Physica D 152-153, 78-84 (2001).

[10] F. Calogero, Nonlinear differential algorithm to compute all the zeros

of a generic polynomial, J. Math. Phys. 57, 083508 (4 pages) (2016),
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4960821; Comment on Nonlinear differential al-
gorithm to compute all the zeros of a generic polynomial [J. Math. Phys. 57,
083508 (2016)], J. Math. Phys. 57, 104101 (4 pages) (2016).

[11] F. Calogero, Novel differential algorithm to evaluate all the zeros of any
generic polynomial, J. Nonlinear Math. Phys. 24, 469-472 (2017). DOI:
10.1080/14029251.2017.1375685.

[12] M. K. Salehani, Identification of generic stable dynamical systems taking a

nonlinear differential approach, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B 23 (10),
4541-4555, (2018). doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018175.

[13] F. Calogero, Zeros of entire functions and related systems of infinitely many
nonlinearly-coupled evolution equations, Theor. Math. Phys. 196 (2), 1111-
1128 (2018).

[14] O. Bihun and F. Calogero, Generations of monic polynomials such that the
coefficients of each polynomial of the next generation coincide with the zeros of
a polynomial of the current generation, and new solvable many-body problems,
Lett. Math. Phys. 106 (7), 1011-1031 (2016); DOI: 10.1007/s11005-016-0836-8.
arXiv: 1510.05017 [math-ph].

[15] F. Calogero, New C-integrable and S-integrable systems of nonlinear partial

differential equation, J. Nonlinear Math. Phys. 24 (1), 142-148 (2017).

[16] O. Bihun and F. Calogero, Generations of solvable discrete-time dynamical

systems, J. Math. Phys. 58, 052701 (21 pages) (2017); doi: 10.1063/1.4982959.

[17] F. Calogero, Finite and infinite systems of nonlinearly coupled ordinary differ-
ential equations the solutions of which feature remarkable Diophantine findings,
J. Nonlinear Math. Phys. 25, 434-442 (2018).

[18] F. Calogero, Solvable nonlinear discrete-time evolutions and Diophantine find-

ings, J. Nonlinear Math. Phys. 25, 1-3 (2018).

i i

i i
 i i

i i

A2. Integrable nonlinear PDEs on the half-line

A S Fokas a and B Pelloni b

aDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics,

University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0WA, United Kingdom
bDepartment of Mathematics, Heriot-Watt University,
Edinburgh EH14 4AS, United Kingdom

1 Introduction
The Inverse Scattering Transform, pioneered at the end of the 1960’s by Kruskal
et al. [50] and consolidated throughout the 1970’s by the work of many others
[5, 6, 55, 59], is considered one of the most important advances in the study of
nonlinear evolution PDEs. This transform can be used for analysing integrable
nonlinear evolution PDEs in one space dimension, and is essentially a nonlinear
version of the Fourier transform in one variable. It can be applied to systems with
the property that the nonlinearity is exactly balanced by other effects, such as
dispersive effects. This implies that, in many important respects, the behaviour
of the solutions of the system is highly regular. For example, when posed on the
infinite line, these systems admit localised solutions, referred to as solitons, that
interact elastically - the interaction does not affect the amplitude and speed of the
solutions. More importantly still, localised initial conditions with sufficient energy
will eventually evolve into a train of solitons, followed by a dispersive tail.
In addition to nonlinear evolution PDEs in one space variable, there exists a
variety of other types of integrable systems, including PDEs in two space variables
[39, 9], ODEs such as the classical Painlevé equations [49] and singular integral
nonlinear equations such as the Benjamin-Ono equation [41]. The defining property
of integrable systems is the existence of a Lax pair, namely the fact that the given
equation can be written as the compatibility of two linear eigenvalue equations
involving the eigenvalue λ ∈ C and the eigenfunction Ψ, which may be scalar or
matrix-valued. The eigenvalue λ is sometimes referred to as the spectral parameter;
in analogy with the Fourier transform, λ plays the role of the independent variable
in Fourier space.

The Unified Transform or Fokas Method

The study of boundary value problems for integrable PDEs in the last fifteen years
has motivated the development of a new powerful method in mathematical physics,
usually referred to as Unified Transform or Fokas Method. This approach combines
the main insights of the Inverse Scattering Transform with elements of the theory
of Riemann-Hilbert problems, and uses essentially complex analytic properties to
eliminate unknown boundary values from the solution representation. This method,
15

i i

i i
 i i

i i

16 A S Fokas and B Pelloni

proposed by Fokas and extensively developed by the authors and others, has pro-
duced a substantial body of results and, unexpectedly, has led to a new perspective
and results on the theory of boundary value problems also for linear PDEs in two
independent variables. For an introduction to this theory and a summary of the
main results, see [30] (see also [19] for a review of linear boundary value problems
and [38] for recent applications and advances).

The Unified Transform has its origin in two fundamental observations. These
observations, seemingly pertaining to separate fields, yield the formulation in terms
of a Riemann-Hilbert problem, namely to the problem of reconstructing a function
of a complex variable λ, analytic everywhere off a given contour, from its known
jump condition across the contour (a clear, non-technical review of Riemann-Hilbert
problems in this context can be found in [52]. Riemann-Hilbert problems appear in
a disparate variety of problems in mathematics and mathematical physics [21].
The two observations are the following:

1. The Lax pair formulation provides a highly nontrivial generalisation of the

concept of separation of variables, valid for both linear and integrable nonlin-
ear PDEs [40].

2. Integral transforms such as the Fourier transform can be derived via the spec-
tral analysis of an ODE in the complex plane [32].

The origin of the Fokas Method is the realisation that the existence of a Lax
pair makes it possible to solve both ODEs of this pair simultaneously. Just as the
analysis of a single ODE yields a transform associated with one given independent
variable, this simultaneous analysis yields a transform associated with both inde-
pendent variables. Moreover, since this transform is associated with the particular
Lax pair, it is also custom-made for the given PDE. Combining this idea with the
two observations above, it is possible to construct algorithmically a formal integral
representation of the solution of a given boundary value problem for an integrable
PDE - this construction is the basis of the Unified Transform approach. It is im-
portant to note that this representation generally involves contours in the complex
plane. Actually, for the solution of a linear PDE, the solution representation takes
the form of an integral along such a complex contour.
The representation derived in this way has explicit dependence on the indepen-
dent variables of the PDE, hence it is straightforward to show that it indeed provides
a solution of the PDE. For evolution problems, one verifies easily that at t = 0 the
solution representation satisfies the given initial condition.
However, this representation involves all the boundary values of the solution,
while in general some of the boundary values cannot be prescribed independently
as boundary conditions, and are therefore unknown. Indeed, the main difficulty
in the Fokas Method is the elimination of the unknown boundary values from the
representation.
However, already at this point, a significant advantage of the unified transform
becomes clear: since it involves explicit dependence on the independent variables of

i i

i i
 i i

i i

A2. Integrable nonlinear PDEs on the half-line 17

the problem, asymptotic and qualitative information on the solution can be derived
directly, even before the contribution of the unknown boundary values is eliminated.

Elimination of the Unknown Boundary Values

To give a concrete example and illustrate the difficulty of dealing with unknown
boundary values, consider the simplest third order linear PDE, namely

∂t q(x, t) + ∂xxx q(x, t) = 0, x ∈ I, 0 < t < T, q(x, 0) = q0 (x) (1.1)

where I denotes a finite or infinite interval in R, the given initial condition q0 (x) is
assumed sufficiently smooth and decaying if I is infinite, and T is a given positive
constant.
When I = R, hence the PDE is posed on the full line, assuming sufficiently rapid
decay of the solution as x → ±∞, one obtains a Cauchy initial value problem for
(1.1). The standard approach for solving this problem involves taking the Fourier
transform of this equation to obtain a first order ODE that can be solved explicitly:

FT ∂ q̂(λ, t)
qt + ∂x3 q = 0 PDE → ODE + (iλ)3 q̂(λ, t) = 0, (1.2)
∂t
where
Z∞
q̂(λ, t) = e−iλx q(x, t)dx.
−∞

Solving the ODE and inverting, one finds

Z∞
−(iλ)3 t 1 3
q̂(λ, t) = e q̂(λ, 0) → q(x, t) = eiλx+iλ t q̂(λ, 0)dλ.
2π
−∞

Consider now the case that I = [0, ∞), assuming that the solution decays as
x → ∞, and that the boundary condition q(0, t) = f0 (t) is prescribed. Following
the same steps as for I = R, namely taking the Fourier transform of q(x, t) on the
half line, solving the resulting ODE, which now contains three boundary values at
x = 0, and evaluating the inverse transform of the result, one finds the following
integral representation of the solution of (1.1) on the half-line:
Z∞
∞ 
Z
1 3
q(x, t) = eiλx+iλ t  e−iλy q0 (y)dy  dλ + (1.3)
2π
−∞ 0
Z∞
 t 
Z
1 3 3
eiλx+iλ t  e−iλ s qxx (0, s) + iλqx (0, s) − λ2 f0 (s) ds dλ.


+
2π
−∞ 0

The first term in this representation is the contribution of the initial condition. This
would have been the only term present when solving the Cauchy value problem for

i i

i i
 i i

i i

18 A S Fokas and B Pelloni

decaying data, with the integration in y extending over R. In this term, the x and
t dependence is explicit through the exponential term.
The second term involves the boundary values of the solution at x = 0, but two
of the boundary values involved in the integrand are not directly available. This is
the generic case: to guarantee that the boundary value problem admits a unique
solution, only one condition can be prescribed at this boundary, and therefore in
general two boundary values are unknown [36, 37].
This difficulty can be overcome for certain PDEs of second order in x by using
the sine or cosine transform. However, this is not possible for PDEs involving
third order derivatives. In addition, even using the sine or cosine transform, the t-
dependence of the resulting expression is not explicit, as t appears in the integration
interval as well as in the exponential part of the integrand. Last but not least, the
integral expressions derived by using the sine or cosine transform are not uniformly
convergent when x → 0. For example, in the case of the heat equation with q(0, t) =
f0 (t), the sine transform yields
Z∞
∞
ZT

Z
2 2 2
q(x, t) = sin(λx)e−λ t  sin(λy)q0 (y)dy − eλ s f0 (s)ds dλ. (1.4)
π
0 0 0

Letting x = 0 in the above expression and assuming that we can take the limit x → 0
inside the integral, we find that q(0, t) = 0, not q(0, t) = f0 (t). Thus we cannot
take the limit x → 0 inside the integral, i.e. the above integral is not uniformly
convergent.
For the case of equation (1.1), where there does not exist a classical transform,
the Unified Transform yields the following representation for the solution of the
problem with q(0, t) = f0 (t) as the prescribed boundary condition:
Z∞
∞ 
Z
1 3
q(x, t) = eiλx+iλ t  e−iλy q0 (y)dy  dλ + (1.5)
2π
−∞ 0
 T 
Z Z
1 3 3
eiλx+iλ t  e−iλ s qxx (0, s) + iλqx (0, s) − λ2 f0 (s) ds dλ,


+
2π
∂D+ 0

where ∂D+ is the contour in C+ defined by Re(iλ3 ) = 0, see Figure 1.

The formulation (1.5) has fully explicit x and t dependence, and it is uniformly
convergent at the boundary x = 0, a fact that plays an important role also in de-
vising efficient numerical schemes [24, 25]. Moreover, by considering the transforms
of the boundary values (with respect to t) as functions of the complex variable λ,
it is possible to eliminate all unknown contributions. This elimination procedure
is most naturally understood once the representation derived is of the form (1.5).
Indeed, this elimination cannot be obtained by confining the spectral parameter λ
to be real, hence restricting attention to real transforms.
As an example, the solution of the particular boundary value problem for the
PDE (1.1) obtained when q(0, t) = f0 (t) is the prescribed boundary condition for

i i

i i
 i i

i i

A2. Integrable nonlinear PDEs on the half-line 19

λ-plane
A
A Re(iλ3 τ ) > 0


A

Re(iλ3 τ ) <0 A
A


Re(iλ3 τ ) < 0
A D+

A

A

A

A π


A 3

A
R
(τ > 0)

Figure 1. The domain D+

0 < t < T , is given by

Z
1 3
q(x, t) = eiλx+iλ t q̂0 (λ)dλ (1.6)
2π
R
Z
1 3
h i
+ eiλx+iλ t (θ − 1)q̂0 (θ2 λ) + (1 − θ2 )q̂0 (θλ) + 3λ2 f˜0 (λ) dλ,
2π
∂D+

with

Z∞ ZT
−iλy − 3
qˆ0 (λ) = e q0 (y)dy, λ∈C , f˜0 (λ) = e−iλ s f (s)ds, θ = e2πi/3 . (1.7)
0 0

In this linear example, the expression (1.5) can also be derived without using a Lax
pair formulation: it can be obtained from (1.3) by simply considering analyticity
properties with respect to the variable λ, extended from R to C, and deforming the
contour of integration. However, this deformation is not possible in the nonlinear
case. The general methodology to obtain the representation (1.5) is based instead
on using the Lax pair formulation and on deriving a Riemann-Hilbert problem. This
general approach can indeed be extended to the case of nonlinear integrable evolu-
tion equations in one space variable, e.g. to the famous KdV or mKdV equation,
posed on the domain 0 < x < ∞, 0 < t < T :

(KdV ) qt + qxxx + qx + 6qqx = 0, (1.8)

2
(mKdV ) qt + qxxx + ν6q qx = 0, ν = ±1. (1.9)

However, in this case, the elimination of the unknown boundary values can be
carried out as effectively as in the linear case only for special boundary conditions,
called linearisable [27, 29]. For general boundary conditions, the characterisation of
the unknown boundary values is more complicated [42, 43].

i i

i i
 i i

i i

20 A S Fokas and B Pelloni

In this article, we present a summary of the main results obtained by this ap-
proach for boundary value problems on the half-line, unifying the treatment of linear
and integrable nonlinear PDEs in two independent variables. Our aim is to review
the main ideas and tools needed to carry out this programme successfully, and dis-
cuss its limitations, avoiding detailed proofs. For the details, the reader can refer
to the papers cited throughout.
We will not include in the treatment of the nonlinear case any consideration
of isolated singularities in the spectral variable λ, although soliton solutions arise
precisely from these singularities. This mechanism is well understood and it is not
specific to the treatment of boundary value problems, which is the focus of this
paper [1, 4].
We note that problems periodic in x have been analysed with algebro-geometric
techniques [12, 23, 54]. However, these techniques can be used only to construct
particular solutions, namely x-periodic versions of soliton solutions. Although it
has been established a long time ago that such problems are linearisable [48], the
implementation of the unified transform to this class of problems remains open.

2 Transforms and Riemann-Hilbert problems

2.1 Fourier inversion via a Riemann-Hilbert problem
Let q(x) ∈ S(R) be a given, arbitrary function, and consider the following auxiliary
ODE:

µx − iλµ = q(x), µ = µ(x, λ), x ∈ R, λ ∈ C. (2.1)

Following the approach of [32], we seek a solution µ(x, λ) bounded as λ →

∞, ∀λ ∈ C. It is straightforward to find two solutions bounded in C+ and C−
respectively:
Zx
µ+ (x, λ) = eiλ(x−y) q(y)dy, bounded for Im(λ) ≥ 0,
−∞

Z∞
µ− (x, λ) = − eiλ(x−y) q(y)dy bounded for Im(λ) ≤ 0.
x

In addition, the functions µ± have the following properties (see Figure 2):

• µ± is analytic in C±

• µ± = O λ1 as λ → ∞ in C± ,

• For λ ∈ R, where both functions µ± are defined, the difference is

(µ+ − µ− )(x, λ) = eiλx q̂(λ) λ∈R (2.2)

i i

i i
 i i

i i

A2. Integrable nonlinear PDEs on the half-line 21

where
Z∞
q̂(λ) = e−iλy q(y)dy, λ ∈ R. (2.3)
−∞

C+
(λ plane) µ+

eiλx q̂(λ) = µ+ − µ− - Im λ=0

µ−
C−
Figure 2. A Riemann-Hilbert problem on the real line

Hence, given q(x), the transform q̂(λ) is obtained as the jump of the sectionally
analytic solution µ such that µ = µ+ for λ ∈ C+ and µ = µ− for λ ∈ C− .
Conversely, suppose q̂(λ) is given. Then the data above determine uniquely a
scalar Riemann-Hilbert problem for µ, with jump on the real line given by the right
hand side of (2.2). This Riemann-Hilbert problem can be solved explicitly by the
so-called Plemelj formula [2]. This yields
Z∞ Z∞
1 [µ+ − µ− ] (x, ζ) 1 eiζx q̂(ζ)
µ(x, λ) = dζ = dζ. (2.4)
2πi ζ −λ 2πi ζ −λ
−∞ −∞

Hence using
q(x) = µx − iλµ,
one finds
Z∞
1
q(x) = eiζx q̂(ζ)dζ, x ∈ R. (2.5)
2π
−∞

In summary: the first order ODE (2.1) gives rise to the pair of equations (2.3)-
(2.5), i.e. it encodes the Fourier transform.

Note that the transform q̂(λ) can also be defined as

h i
q̂(λ) = lim −e−iλx µ− (x, λ) , (2.6)
x→−∞

and that the expression (2.5) for q(x) in terms of q̂(λ) can also be derived starting
from the asymptotic information
iq(x)
µ± ∼ , |λ| → ∞ =⇒ q(x) = −i lim λµ(x, λ). (2.7)
λ λ→∞

i i

i i
 i i

i i

22 A S Fokas and B Pelloni

These latter formulae have a direct analogue in the nonlinear case presented in
the next section. Indeed, the steps outlined here for the derivation of the Fourier
transform can be used to give a derivation of other linear and nonlinear integral
transforms, compute the associated inversion formula and prove rigorously its va-
lidity. This approach provides a new proof of the inversion formula for many classical
transforms such as Mellin, Abel and Radon transforms, as well as the first proof of
the inversion formula for the attenuated Radon transform, widely used in medical
imaging [31, 57].

2.2 The Inverse Scattering Trasform: a nonlinear Fourier trans-

form
The approach just described for formulating and inverting integral transforms has a
nonlinear analogue. This nonlinear transform can be used to solve the initial value
problem for integrable nonlinear evolution PDEs, in a way analogous to the use of
Fourier transform in the linear case.
The starting point is a matrix -valued ODE, rather than the scalar ODE (2.1):
define the matrix Q in terms of the given arbitrary function q(x) ∈ S(R) (although
much less regularity is required, see [7, 9]) by
 
0 q(x)
Q(x) = , (2.8)
±q(x) 0
where the bar denotes complex conjugation, and consider the ODE
Mx + iλ[σ3 , M ] = QM x ∈ R, λ ∈ C; M (x, λ) a 2 × 2 matrix, (2.9)
where
[σ3 , M ] = σ3 M − M σ3 , σ3 = diag(1, −1). (2.10)
One seeks a solution M (x, λ) of this ODE well-defined for all λ ∈ C. As in the
linear case, one considers two particular solutions: a solution µ1 (x, λ) which has
(1) (2)
the first column µ1 bounded for λ ∈ C− and the second column µ1 bounded for
λ ∈ C+ (we denote this concisely as λ ∈ (C− , C+ )); and a a solution µ2 (x, λ) whose
columns have the opposite boundedness. Explicitly, µ1 , and µ2 are defined as the
solutions of the linear integral equations
Z∞
µ1 (x, λ) = I − e−iλ(x−y)c
σ3
Q(y)µ1 (y, λ)dy, λ ∈ (C− , C+ ),
x
Zx
µ2 (x, λ) = I + e−iλ(x−y)c
σ3
Q(y)µ2 (y, λ)dy, λ ∈ (C+ , C− ).
−∞
σ3 ) on a 2 × 2 matrix A is
The notation used above means that the action of exp(xc
given by
e−2x a12
 
−xc
σ3 a11
e A= . (2.11)
e2x a21 a22

i i

i i
 i i

i i

A2. Integrable nonlinear PDEs on the half-line 23

For λ ∈ R, where both µ1 and µ2 are defined, these solutions are related by

µ1 (x, λ) = µ2 (xλ)e−ixλc
σ3
s(λ), λ ∈ R, (2.12)

where, in analogy with (2.6), one has

 
ixλc
σ3 a(λ) b(λ)
s(λ) = lim [e µ1 (x, λ)] = , λ ∈ R.
x→−∞ b(λ) a(λ)

By re-arranging the jump matrix s(λ) in (2.12), one finds that the two matrix-valued
(1) (2) (1) (2)
function M ± , defined as M − = (µ1 , µ2 ) and M + = (µ2 , µ1 ) and analytic in
±
C respectively, satisfy a jump condition across R of the form

M − (x, λ) = M + (x, λ)eiλxc

σ3
J(λ), λ ∈ R, (2.13)

as well as asymptotic conditions

 
± 1
M =I +O , as |λ| → ∞.
λ
The jump J(λ), defined for λ ∈ R by
 
1 −γ(λ) b(λ)
J(λ) = , λ ∈ R; γ(λ) = , (2.14)
±γ(λ) 1 + |γ(λ)|2 a(λ)
is now matrix-valued. The entries of the 2×2 matrix J(λ) are defined (for a(λ) 6= 0)
b(λ)
in terms of γ(λ) = a(λ) , where the spectral functions a(λ) and b(λ) are the entries
of s(λ) as defined in (2.12).
Hence, given the matrix Q(x), the relation (2.12) defines the spectral functions
a(λ), b(λ), and then (2.14) yields the transform J(λ).
Conversely, given J(λ), the jump equation (2.13) defines a Riemann-Hilbert prob-
lem, with a jump on the real line, for M (x, λ). Note that the jump matrix J(λ)
and the function M (x, λ) are well-defined only modulo possible isolated singular-
ities arising at the zeros of a(λ) in the complex plane. While it is generally an
open problem to characterise rigorously the properties of these singularities from
the given initial datum, it is often assumed in the context of the inverse scattering
transform that there are only finitely many, and then by giving residue conditions
at the associated poles one can uniquely specify the associated Riemann-Hilbert
problem. For the purpose of this review, we assume that there are no such zeros
(see also remark 4.2).
The difference with the linear case is that in this case the jump condition is
multiplicative. The multiplicative, non-commutative structure of the Riemann-
Hilbert problem is a manifestation of the nonlinearity of the equation, and it implies
that the solution does not have an explicit expression analogous to the one in (2.4).
However, it is a classical result that the solution M (x, λ) of the Riemann-Hilbert
problem can be characterised through the solution of a linear integral equation, and
its unique solvability can be rigorously proved, appealing to the symmetries of s(λ)
which are a consequence of the form of the matrix Q(x) [9, 10, 11, 22].

i i

i i
 i i

i i

24 A S Fokas and B Pelloni

From the expression for M (x, λ) one must derive an expression for q(x) and
thus formulate the associated inverse transform. Recall that, in the linear case,
µ ∼ iq/λ as λ → ∞. Similarly, from the expression for M (x, λ), one can determine
the arbitrary function q by computing the λ asymptotic of the (1, 2) element of the
matrix M (x, λ), as done in (2.7), and obtain
q(x) = 2i lim (λM12 (x, λ)).
|λ|→∞

The above procedure gives rise to a nonlinear version of the Fourier transform,
known as the Inverse Scattering Transform (IST). The jump matrix J(λ) is the
analogue of the direct Fourier transform. Indeed, the direct and inverse transform
diagram can be summarised as follows:
Direct transform - obtain J(λ) from q(x) via solving an ODE for M (x, t, λ):
 
0 q(x)
q −→ Q = −→
±q̄(x) 0
−→ M : Mx + iλ[σ3 , M ] = QM −→ eiλxc
σ3
J = (M + )−1 M − .
Inverse transform - obtain q(x) from J(λ) via solving a Riemann-Hilbert prob-
lem for M (x, t, λ):
 
+ iλxc
σ3 − 1
J −→ M : M =e JM , x ∈ R, M = I + O −→ q = 2i lim (λM12 ).
λ λ→∞

3 The structure of integrable PDEs: Lax pair formula-

tion
A useful Lax pair for several important evolution PDEs takes the general form

Mx + if1 (λ)[σ3 , M ] = Q(x, t, λ)M,
(3.1)
Mt + if2 (λ)[σ3 , M ] = Q̃(x, t, λ)M,
where σ3 and the commutator [·, ·] are defined in (2.8), (2.10).
The particular form of the functions fi (λ), Q(x, t, λ), Q̃(x, t, λ) depends on the
specific PDE. Throughout this review, we will consider two of the most important
integrable evolution PDEs, arising as models in mathematical physics, namely the
nonlinear Schrödinger (NLS) and modified Korteweg-deVries (mKdV) equations.
The case of this second- and third-order evolution equation illustrate the general
approach for integrable evolution PDEs in one space variable. For these equations,
the Lax pair is given by the following choices:
NLS

iqt + qxx − 2νqx |q|2 = 0, ν = ±1; (3.2)

Lax pair : f1 (λ) = λ, f2 (λ) = 2λ2 ,

 
0 q(x)
Q= , Q̃ = 2λQ − iQx σ3 ± |q|2 σ3 ;
ν q̄(x) 0

i i

i i
 i i

i i

A2. Integrable nonlinear PDEs on the half-line 25

mKdV

qt + qxxx − 6νq 2 qx = 0, ν = ±1; (3.3)

Lax pair : f1 (λ) = λ, f2 (λ) = 4λ3 ,

 
0 q(x, t)
Q= ,
νq(x, t) 0
Q̃ = 2Q3 − Qxx − 2iλ[Q2 + Qx ]σ3 + 4λ2 Q.

There is no general methodology for finding a Lax pair associated with a given
nonlinear PDE, although the dressing method of Shabat and Zakharov can be used
to derive an integrable PDE by starting from a Lax pair for a given linear PDE
[30, 59].

3.1 The solution of the Cauchy problem on the line using the In-
verse Scattering Transform
The Lax pair formulation of the NLS equation is given explicitly by

Mx + iλ[σ3 , M ] = QM
λ ∈ C, (3.4)
Mt + 2iλ2 [σ3 , M ] = (2λQ − iQx σ3 − iν|q|2 σ3 )M

where M = M (x, t, λ), implies that q(x, t) solves the PDE (3.2) if and only if for
all λ ∈ C there exists an invertible matrix-valued function M (x, t, λ) solving (3.4).
The NLS is obtained by imposing the compatibility condition Mxt = Mtx .
The first ODE in this pair is precisely the ODE associated with the nonlinear
Fourier transform derived earlier, where now q(x, t) replaces q(x). The second
part of the Lax pair is used to determine the time evolution of J(λ, t), which now
depends on t. Given q(x, 0) = q0 (x) ∈ S(R), one constructs M (x, 0, λ) and then
2
J0 (λ) = J(λ, 0). The t-part of the Lax pair implies J(λ, t) = e−iλ tσ̂3 .
Conversely, given J(λ, t) the function q(x, t) can be represented in terms of the
elements of the matrix M (x, t, λ) as

q(x, t) = 2i lim (λM12 (x, t, λ)),

|λ|→∞

where the function M (x, t, λ), sectionally analytic for λ ∈ C, is the solution of the
Riemann-Hilbert problem determined by
 
2 σ 1
M − = M + e(iλx−iλ t)c 3
J0 (λ), λ ∈ R, M =I +O as |λ| → ∞,
λ

with the jump matrix J0 (λ) given by

 
1 −γ(λ) b(λ)
J0 (λ) = , λ ∈ R; γ(λ) = , (3.5)
±γ(λ) 1 + |γ(λ)|2 a(λ)

i i

i i
 i i

i i

26 A S Fokas and B Pelloni

and the spectral functions a(λ), b(λ) are defined by in terms of the given initial
condition q0 (x) as
 
M21 (x, 0, λ)
(b(λ), a(λ)) = lim (m(x, λ)1 , m(x, λ)2 ), m(x, λ) =
x→−∞ M22 (x, 0, λ)

(to simplify the exposition, here and in the sequel it is assumed that a(λ) has no
zeros).
The vector m(x, λ), as the second column vector of the solution of the first ODE
in the Lax pair at t = 0, satisfies
   
1 0 0 q0 (x)
mx (x, λ) + 2iλ m(x, λ) = m(x, λ),
0 0 ±q¯0 0
 
0
lim m(x, λ) = .
x→∞ 1

The expressions above make it apparent that the spectral functions a(λ), b(λ) de-
pend only on the initial condition q0 (x), and that the time dependence only enters
(explicitly) through the exponential term.

4 An integral transform for nonlinear boundary value

problems
Consider the defocusing NLS equation (3.2) with ν = 1 in the variables x ∈ R and
t ∈ R, posed in the domain

Ω = {(x, t) : 0 < x < ∞, 0 < t < T } ⊂ R2 . (4.1)

Examples of such equations are the NLS, KdV and mKdV equations given by
(3.2), (1.8), (1.9) respectively, as well as many other important equations of math-
ematical physics. In analogy with the case of the full line in section 3.1, the role of
the Fourier transform of the initial condition q0 (x) is played by the spectral data
defined in terms of the initial information. These spectral data are the pair of
functions a(λ), b(λ) such that
   
b(λ) M21 (x, 0, λ)
= ,
a(λ) M22 (x, 0, λ)

where M (x, 0, λ) is the solution of the x part of the Lax pair, i.e. the first ODE
in (3.4), evaluated at t = 0. It is useful to express more transparently the relation
between q0 (x) and a(λ), b(λ): let

Ψ(x, λ) = M (x, 0, λ).

The function Ψ(x, λ) has symmetries inherited from the matrices Q, Q̃, so it is
enough to consider one of its columns. For example, the second column of Ψ(x, λ)

i i

i i
 i i

i i

A2. Integrable nonlinear PDEs on the half-line 27

satisfies, for 0 < x < ∞, the following ODE:

      
Ψ21 (x, λ) 1 0 0 q0 (x) Ψ21 (x, λ)
∂x + 2iλ ψ(x, λ) = ,
Ψ22 (x, λ) 0 0 q0 (x) 0 Ψ22 (x, λ)
   
Ψ21 (x, λ) 0
lim = , λ ∈ C+ . (4.2)
x→∞ Ψ22 (x, λ) 1
The solution of these ODEs is equivalent to a linear Volterra integral equation,
hence well defined.
Similarly, the boundary conditions q(0, t), qx (0, t) determine a pair of functions
A(λ), B(λ) such that
   2iλ2 T 
B(λ) e M21 (0, T, λ)
= ,
A(λ) M22 (0, T, λ)

where M (0, t, λ) is the solution of the t part of the Lax pair, i.e. the second ODE in
(3.4), evaluated at x = 0. It is desirable to express the relation between boundary
values and these spectral functions, and to conform with the usual notation, set

Φ(t, λ) = M (0, t, λ).

Again, symmetry considerations imply that it is enough to consider one column of

this function. For example, the second column of Φ(t, λ) satisfies, for 0 < t < T
and λ ∈ C, the following ODE:
    
Φ21 (t, λ) 2 1 0 Φ21 (t, λ)
∂t + 4iλ =
Φ22 (t, λ) 0 0 Φ22 (t, λ)
−i|q(0, t)|2
  
−iqx (0, t) + 2λq(0, t) Φ21 (t, λ)
,
−iqx (0, t) + 2λq(0, t) i|q(0, t)|2 Φ22 (t, λ)
   
Φ21 (0, λ) 0
= , λ ∈ C, (4.3)
Φ22 (0, λ) 1
which again is equivalent to a linear Volterra integral equation, hence well defined.
Note that since in general only one boundary condition involving the two bound-
ary values q(0, t) and qx (0, t) can be prescribed, the boundary spectral functions
A(λ), B(λ) are not fully characterised by the above ODE.
Nevertheless the solution q(x, t) has a formal representation in terms of the so-
lution M (x, t, λ) of a Riemann-Hilbert problem defined on the real and imaginary
axes, whose jump is defined in terms of the spectral functions a(λ), b(λ), A(λ) and
B(λ). The function q(x, t) exists uniquely, has explicit x and t dependence, and it
represents a solution of the PDE satisfying the initial condition. In general, it will
not satisfy prescribed boundary conditions. However, if the full set of boundary
values is assumed a priori to satisfy the additional constraint given by the global
relation, then the function q(x, t) satisfies these boundary values.
For a general nonlinear integrable PDE the main question is how to deter-
mine the unknown boundary values in terms of the given initial and boundary

i i

i i
 i i

i i

28 A S Fokas and B Pelloni

conditions. Given q0 (x) ∈ S(R+ ) and a subset of set of the boundary values
{fk (t) = ∂kx q(0, t)}n−1
k=0 , the main problem becomes to show that the global relation
characterises the remaining unknown boundary values. This involves the analysis of
the global relation in the complex λ plane to determine a representation depending
only on the prescribed initial and boundary conditions.
As discussed below, this step is fully successful in the nonlinear case only for
certain special types of boundary conditions, called linearisable boundary condition.
For generic boundary conditions, the characterisation of the unknown boundary
values via the global relation is itself a nonlinear problem, and it reduces to solving
a nonlinear system of equations [29].

4.1 The integral representation of the solution

In this section we summarise the steps needed to derive the main formal statement
regarding integrable evolution PDE in the two independent variables (x, t) ∈ Ω,
where Ω is given by (4.1). Rather than specifying a set of boundary conditions,
one assumes a-priori that the initial condition and the full set of boundary values
satisfy the global relation. See [42] for details.
For several of the most physically relevant PDEs in this class, the Lax pair takes
the form (3.1). In this form, M (x, t, λ) is a 2 × 2 matrix-valued function, while
f1 (λ), f2 (λ) are given analytic (usually polynomial) functions of λ, encoding the
dispersion relation of the PDE.
The Lax pair (3.1) can be written in terms of a differential form W (x, t, λ) as
d[e(if1 (λ)x+if2 (λ)t)c
σ3
M (x, t, λ)] = e(if1 (λ)x+f2 (λ)t)c
σ3
W (x, t, λ), (4.4)
where the meaning of the notation eσc3 is given in (2.11) and
h i
W (x, t, λ) = Q(x, t, λ)dx + Q̃(x, t, λ)dt M (x, t, λ). (4.5)

4.1.1 The direct problem

The first step is constructing simultaneous solutions of the two ODEs in the Lax
pair, bounded and analytic as functions of λ in simply connected regions of the
complex plane whose union is the whole plane. These basic eigenfunctions are
given by
(x,t)
Z
Mj (x, t, λ) = I + e(−if1 (λ)(x−ξ)−if2 (λ)(t−τ ))c
σ3
Wj (ξ, τ, λ), (x, t), (xj , tj ) ∈ Ω.
(xj ,tj )
(4.6)
In order to define a solution M (x, t, λ) defined and analytic everywhere except on a
contour, it is sufficient to consider the points (xj , tj ) as the vertices of the unbounded
polygon Ω, namely
(x1 , t1 ) = (0, T ), (x2 , t2 ) = (0, 0), (x3 , t3 ) = (∞, t),

i i

i i
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
 “‘God bless you, Mr. President!’ said the father, the only words
he had uttered; and the mother, making a low courtesy, fairly
sobbed: ‘O sir, we are so much obliged to you.’ ‘Yes, yes; all right;
and you will find that that will bring him,’ was spoken in tones so
kindly and tender, that they have often since thrilled my memory.”
 XXXVII.
In the year 1855 or ’56, George B. Lincoln, Esq., of Brooklyn,
was travelling through the West in connection with a large New York
dry-goods establishment. He found himself one night in an
insignificant town on the Illinois River, by the name of Naples. The
only tavern of the place had evidently been constructed with
reference to business on the smallest possible scale. Poor as the
prospect seemed, Mr. Lincoln had no alternative but to put up at the
place. The supper-room was also used as a lodging-room. After a
tolerable supper and a comfortable hour before the fire, Mr. L. told
his host that he thought he would “go to bed.” “Bed!” echoed the
landlord; “there is no bed for you in this house, unless you sleep with
that man yonder. He has the only one we have to spare.” “Well,”
returned Mr. Lincoln, “the gentleman has possession, and perhaps
would not like a bedfellow.” Upon this, a grizzly head appeared out of
the pillows, and said, “What is your name?” “They call me Lincoln at
home,” was the reply. “Lincoln!” repeated the stranger; “any
connection of our Illinois Abraham?” “No,” replied Mr. L., “I fear not.”
“Well,” said the old man, “I will let any man by the name of ‘Lincoln’
sleep with me, just for the sake of the name. You have heard of
Abe?” he inquired. “Oh yes, very often,” replied Mr. Lincoln. “No man
could travel far in this State without hearing of him, and I would be
very glad to claim connection, if I could do so honestly.” “Well,” said
the old gentleman, “my name is Simmons. ‘Abe’ and I used to live
and work together when we were young men. Many a job of wood-
cutting and rail-splitting have I done up with him. Abe Lincoln,” said
he with emphasis, “was the likeliest boy in God’s world. He would
work all day as hard as any of us—and study by firelight in the log-
house half the night; and in this way he made himself a thorough
practical surveyor. Once, during those days, I was in the upper part
of the State, and I met General Ewing, whom President Jackson had
sent to the Northwest to make surveys. I told him about Abe Lincoln,
what a student he was, and that I wanted he should give him a job;
He looked over his memoranda, and, pulling out a paper, said:
‘There is —— county must be surveyed; if your friend can do the
work properly, I shall be glad to have him undertake it—the
compensation will be six hundred dollars!’ Pleased as I could be, I
hastened to Abe, after I got home, with an account of what I had
secured for him. He was sitting before the fire in the log-cabin when I
told him; and what do you think was his answer? When I finished, he
looked up very quietly, and said, ‘Mr. Simmons, I thank you very
sincerely for your kindness, but I don’t think I will undertake the job.’
‘In the name of wonder,’ said I, ‘why? Six hundred dollars does not
grow upon every bush out here in Illinois.’ ‘I know that,’ said Abe,
‘and I need the money bad enough, Simmons, as you know; but I
never have been under obligation to a Democratic administration,
and I never intend to be so long as I can get my living another way.
General Ewing must find another man to do his work.’”
I related this story to the President one day, and asked him if it
was true. “Pollard Simmons!” said he: “well do I remember him. It is
correct about our working together; but the old man must have
stretched the facts somewhat about the survey of the county. I think I
should have been very glad of the job at that time, no matter what
administration was in power.” Notwithstanding this, however, I am
inclined to believe Mr. Simmons was not far out of the way. His
statement seems very characteristic of what Abraham Lincoln may
be supposed to have been at twenty-three or twenty-five years of
age.
Mr. G. B. Lincoln also told me of an amusing circumstance which
took place at Springfield soon after Mr. Lincoln’s nomination in 1860.
A hatter in Brooklyn secretly obtained the size of the future
President’s head, and made for him a very elegant hat, which he
sent by his townsman, Lincoln, to Springfield. About the time it was
presented, various other testimonials of a similar character had
come in from different sections. Mr. Lincoln took the hat, and after
admiring its texture and workmanship, put it on his head and walked
up to a looking-glass. Glancing from the reflection to Mrs. Lincoln, he
said, with his peculiar twinkle of the eye, “Well, wife, there is one
thing likely to come out of this scrape, any how. We are going to
have some new clothes!”
One afternoon during the summer of 1862, the President
accompanied several gentlemen to the Washington Navy-yard, to
witness some experiments with a newly-invented gun. Subsequently
the party went aboard of one of the steamers lying at the wharf. A
discussion was going on as to the merits of the invention, in the
midst of which Mr. Lincoln caught sight of some axes hanging up
outside of the cabin. Leaving the group, he quietly went forward, and
taking one down, returned with it, and said: “Gentlemen, you may
talk about your ‘Raphael repeaters’ and ‘eleven-inch Dahlgrens;’ but
here is an institution which I guess I understand better than either of
you.” With that he held the axe out at arm’s length by the end of the
handle, or “helve,” as the wood-cutters call it—a feat not another
person of the party could perform, though all made the attempt. In
such acts as this, showing that he neither forgot nor was ashamed of
his humble origin, the late President exhibited his true nobility of
character. He was a perfect illustration of his favorite poet’s words:—

“The rank is but the guinea’s stamp,

The man’s the gold, for a’ that!”
 XXXVIII.
In March, 1864, Edwin Forrest came to Washington to fulfil an
engagement at Ford’s Theatre. It was announced one day that he
was to appear that evening in “Richelieu.” I was with the President,
when Senator Harris of New York came in. After he had finished his
business, which was to secure the remittance of the sentence of one
of his constituents, who had been imprisoned on what seemed
insufficient grounds, I told the President that Forrest was to play
Richelieu that evening, and, knowing his tastes, I said it was a play
which I thought he would enjoy, for Forrest’s representation of it was
the most life-like of anything I had ever seen upon the stage. “Who
wrote the play?” said he. “Bulwer,” I replied. “Ah!” he rejoined; “well, I
knew Bulwer wrote novels, but I did not know he was a play-writer
also. It may seem somewhat strange to say,” he continued, “but I
never read an entire novel in my life!” Said Judge Harris, “Is it
possible?” “Yes,” returned the President, “it is a fact. I once
commenced ‘Ivanhoe,’ but never finished it.” This statement, in this
age of the world, seems almost incredible—but I give the
circumstance as it occurred.
However it may have been with regard to novels, it is very
certain—as I have already illustrated—that he found time to read
Shakspeare; and that he was also fond of certain kinds of poetry.
N. P. Willis once told me, that he was taken quite by surprise, on a
certain occasion when he was riding with the President and Mrs.
Lincoln, by Mr. Lincoln, of his own accord, referring to, and quoting
several lines from his poem entitled “Parrhasius.”
In the spring of 1862, the President spent several days at
Fortress Monroe, awaiting military operations upon the Peninsula. As
a portion of the Cabinet were with him, that was temporarily the seat
of government, and he bore with him constantly the burden of public
affairs. His favorite diversion was reading Shakspeare. One day (it
chanced to be the day before the capture of Norfolk) as he sat
4
reading alone, he called to his aide in the adjoining room,—“You
have been writing long enough, Colonel; come in here; I want to read
you a passage in ‘Hamlet.’” He read the discussion on ambition
between Hamlet and his courtiers, and the soliloquy, in which
conscience debates of a future state. This was followed by passages
from “Macbeth.” Then opening to “King John,” he read from the third
act the passage in which Constance bewails her imprisoned, lost
boy.
Closing the book, and recalling the words,—

“And, father cardinal, I have heard you say

That we shall see and know our friends in heaven:
If that be true, I shall see my boy again,”—

Mr. Lincoln said: “Colonel, did you ever dream of a lost friend, and
feel that you were holding sweet communion with that friend, and yet
have a sad consciousness that it was not a reality?—just so I dream
of my boy Willie.” Overcome with emotion, he dropped his head on
the table, and sobbed aloud.
 XXXIX.
William Wallace Lincoln, I never knew. He died Thursday,
February 20th, 1862, nearly two years before my intercourse with the
President commenced. He had just entered upon his twelfth year,
and has been described to me as of an unusually serious and
thoughtful disposition. His death was the most crushing affliction Mr.
Lincoln had ever been called upon to pass through.
After the funeral, the President resumed his official duties, but
mechanically, and with a terrible weight at his heart. The following
Thursday he gave way to his feelings, and shut himself from all
society. The second Thursday it was the same; he would see no
one, and seemed a prey to the deepest melancholy. About this time
the Rev. Francis Vinton, of Trinity Church, New York, had occasion to
spend a few days in Washington. An acquaintance of Mrs. Lincoln
and of her sister, Mrs. Edwards, of Springfield, he was requested by
them to come up and see the President. The setting apart of
Thursday for the indulgence of his grief had gone on for several
weeks, and Mrs. Lincoln began to be seriously alarmed for the health
of her husband, of which fact Dr. Vinton was apprised. Mr. Lincoln
received him in the parlor, and an opportunity was soon embraced
by the clergyman to chide him for showing so rebellious a disposition
to the decrees of Providence. He told him plainly that the indulgence
of such feelings, though natural, was sinful. It was unworthy one who
believed in the Christian religion. He had duties to the living, greater
than those of any other man, as the chosen father, and leader of the
people, and he was unfitting himself for his responsibilities by thus
giving way to his grief. To mourn the departed as lost belonged to
heathenism—not to Christianity. “Your son,” said Dr. Vinton, “is alive,
in Paradise. Do you remember that passage in the Gospels: ‘God is
not the God of the dead but of the living, for all live unto him’?” The
President had listened as one in a stupor, until his ear caught the
words, “Your son is alive.” Starting from the sofa, he exclaimed,
“Alive! alive! Surely you mock me.” “No, sir, believe me,” replied Dr.
Vinton; “it is a most comforting doctrine of the church, founded upon
the words of Christ himself.” Mr. Lincoln looked at him a moment,
and then, stepping forward, he threw his arm around the clergyman’s
neck, and, laying his head upon his breast, sobbed aloud. “Alive?
alive?” he repeated. “My dear sir,” said Dr. Vinton, greatly moved, as
he twined his own arm around the weeping father, “believe this, for it
is God’s most precious truth. Seek not your son among the dead; he
is not there; he lives to-day in Paradise! Think of the full import of the
words I have quoted. The Sadducees, when they questioned Jesus,
had no other conception than that Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob were
dead and buried. Mark the reply: ‘Now that the dead are raised, even
Moses showed at the bush when he called the Lord the God of
Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob. For he is not the
God of the dead, but of the living, for all live unto him!’ Did not the
aged patriarch mourn his sons as dead?—‘Joseph is not, and
Simeon is not, and ye will take Benjamin also.’ But Joseph and
Simeon were both living, though he believed it not. Indeed, Joseph
being taken from him, was the eventual means of the preservation of
the whole family. And so God has called your son into his upper
kingdom—a kingdom and an existence as real, more real, than your
own. It may be that he too, like Joseph, has gone, in God’s good
providence, to be the salvation of his father’s household. It is a part
of the Lord’s plan for the ultimate happiness of you and yours. Doubt
it not. I have a sermon,” continued Dr. Vinton, “upon this subject,
which I think might interest you.” Mr. Lincoln begged him to send it at
an early day—thanking him repeatedly for his cheering and hopeful
words. The sermon was sent, and read over and over by the
President, who caused a copy to be made for his own private use
before it was returned. Through a member of the family, I have been
informed that Mr. Lincoln’s views in relation to spiritual things
seemed changed from that hour. Certain it is, that thenceforth he
ceased the observance of the day of the week upon which his son
died, and gradually resumed his accustomed cheerfulness.
 XL.
Among my visitors in the early part of May was the Hon. Mr.
Alley, of Massachusetts, who gave me a deeply interesting inside
glimpse of the Chicago Republican Convention in 1860. The popular
current had, at first, set very strongly in favor of Mr. Seward, who,
many supposed, would be nominated almost by acclamation. The
evening before the balloting the excitement was at the highest pitch.
Mr. Lincoln was telegraphed at Springfield, that his chances with the
Convention depended upon obtaining the votes of two delegations
which were named in the despatch; and that, to secure this support,
he must pledge himself, if elected, to give places in his Cabinet to
the respective heads of those delegations. A reply was immediately
returned over the wires, characteristic of the man. It was to this
effect:—

“I authorize no bargains, and will be bound by none.

A. Lincoln.”

It is unquestionable that the country was not prepared for the

final action of this Convention. In various sections of the Eastern and
Middle States, the antecedents and even the name of Mr. Lincoln
were entirely unknown. The newspapers announced the nominee as
the “Illinois Rail-splitter;” and however popular this title may have
been with the masses, it is not to be denied that it seemed to many
people a very extraordinary qualification for the Presidency. An
acquaintance of mine, who happened to be in Boston on the evening
of the day the Convention adjourned, formed one of a large group at
his hotel, eagerly discussing the result. Only one or two of the party
knew anything whatever of the first name on the “ticket,” and what
they knew was soon told. Considerable disappointment could be
seen in the faces of those composing the circle. One rough-looking
sovereign, from Cape Cod, or Nantucket, had listened attentively, but
taken no part in the conversation. Turning away at length, with an
expression of deep disgust, he muttered: “A set of consummate
fools! Nominate a man for the Presidency who has never smelt salt
water!”
Some of Mr. Lincoln’s immediate neighbors were taken as
completely by surprise as those in distant States. An old resident of
Springfield told me that there lived within a block or two of his house,
in that city, an Englishman, who of course still cherished to some
extent the ideas and prejudices of his native land. Upon hearing of
the choice at Chicago he could not contain his astonishment.
“What!” said he, “Abe Lincoln nominated for President of the
United States? Can it be possible! A man that buys a ten-cent
beefsteak for his breakfast, and carries it home himself.”
A correspondent of the “Portland Press” has given to the public
the following account of Mr. Lincoln’s reception of the nomination:—
“In June, 1860, a Massachusetts gentleman was induced to take
the opportunity, in company with several delegates and others
interested in the objects of the Convention, to go to Chicago and
spend a few days in visiting that section of our country. In a very few
minutes after the final balloting, when Mr. Lincoln was nominated, it
happened that a train of cars started upon the Central Railroad,
passing through Springfield, and Mr. R. took passage in the same.
Arriving at Springfield, he put up at a public house, and, loitering
upon the front door-steps, had the curiosity to inquire of the landlord
where Mr. Lincoln lived. While giving the necessary directions, the
landlord suddenly remarked, ‘There is Mr. Lincoln now, coming down
the sidewalk; that tall, crooked man, loosely walking this way. If you
wish to see him, you will have an opportunity by putting yourself in
his track.’
“In a few moments the object of his curiosity reached the point
the gentleman occupied, who, advancing, ventured to accost him
thus: ‘Is this Mr. Lincoln?’ ‘That, sir, is my name,’ was the courteous
reply. ‘My name is R., from Plymouth County, Massachusetts,’
returned the gentleman, and learning that you have to-day been
made the public property of the United States, I have ventured to
introduce myself, with a view to a brief acquaintance, hoping you will
pardon such a patriotic curiosity in a stranger.’ Mr. Lincoln received
his salutations with cordiality, told him no apology was necessary for
his introduction, and asked him to accompany him to his residence.
He had just come from the telegraph office, where he had learned
the fact of his nomination; and was on his return home, when Mr. R.
met and accompanied him thither.
“Arriving at Mr. Lincoln’s residence, he was introduced to Mrs.
Lincoln and the two boys, and entered into conversation in relation to
the Lincoln family of the Old Colony,—the Hingham General Lincoln
of the Revolutionary army, and the two Worcester Lincolns, brothers,
who were governors of Massachusetts and Maine at one and the
same time. In reply to Mr. R.’s inquiry, whether he could trace his
ancestry to either of those early families of his own name, Mr.
Lincoln, with characteristic facetiousness, replied that he could not
say that he ever had an ancestor older than his father; and therefore
had it not in his power to trace his genealogy to so patriotic a source
as old General Lincoln of the Revolution; though he wished he could.
After some further pleasant conversation, chiefly relating to the early
history of the Pilgrim Fathers, with which he seemed familiar, Mr. R.
desired the privilege of writing a letter to be despatched by the next
mail. He was very promptly and kindly provided with the necessary
means. As he began to write, Mr. Lincoln approached, and tapping
him on the shoulder, expressed the hope that he was not a spy who
had come thus early to report his faults to the public. ‘By no means,
sir,’ protested Mr. R.; ‘I am writing home to my wife, who, I dare say,
will hardly credit the fact that I am writing in your house.’ ‘O, sir,’
rejoined Mr. Lincoln, ‘if your wife doubts your word, I will cheerfully
indorse it, if you will give me permission;’ and taking the pen from Mr.
R., he wrote the following words in a clear hand upon the blank page
of the letter:—

“‘I am happy to say that your husband is at the present time

a guest in my house, and in due time I trust you will greet his
 safe return to the bosom of his family.
A. Lincoln.’

“This gave Mr. R. an excellent autograph of Mr. Lincoln, besides

bearing witness to his hospitable and cheerful spirit.
“Whilst thus engaged in pleasant conversation, the cars arrived
that brought from Chicago the committee of the Convention
appointed to notify Mr. Lincoln of his nomination. He received them
at the door, and conducted them to seats in his parlor. On the
reception of this committee, Mr. Lincoln appeared somewhat
embarrassed, but soon resumed his wonted tranquillity and
cheerfulness. At the proper time, Governor Morgan, of New York,
chairman of the committee, arose, and, with becoming dignity,
informed Mr. Lincoln that he and his fellows appeared in behalf of the
Convention in session at Chicago, to inform him that he had that day
been unanimously nominated to the office of President of the United
States; and asked his permission to report to that body his
acceptance of the nomination. Mr. Lincoln, with becoming modesty,
but very handsomely, replied that he felt his insufficiency for the vast
responsibilities which must devolve upon that office under the
impending circumstances of the times; but if God and his country
called for his services in that direction, he should shrink from no duty
that might be imposed upon him, and therefore he should not decline
the nomination.
“After this ceremony had passed, Mr. Lincoln remarked to the
company, that as an appropriate conclusion to an interview so
important and interesting as that which had just transpired, he
supposed good manners would require that he should treat the
committee with something to drink; and opening a door that led into
a room in the rear, he called out ‘Mary! Mary!’ A girl responded to the
call, to whom Mr. Lincoln spoke a few words in an under-tone, and,
closing the door, returned again to converse with his guests. In a few
minutes the maiden entered, bearing a large waiter, containing
several glass tumblers, and a large pitcher in the midst, and placed it
upon the centre-table. Mr. Lincoln arose, and gravely addressing the
company, said: ‘Gentlemen, we must pledge our mutual healths in
the most healthy beverage which God has given to man—it is the
only beverage I have ever used or allowed in my family, and I cannot
conscientiously depart from it on the present occasion—it is pure
Adam’s ale from the spring;’ and, taking a tumbler, he touched it to
his lips, and pledged them his highest respects in a cup of cold
water. Of course, all his guests were constrained to admire his
consistency, and to join in his example.
“Mr. R., when he went to Chicago, had but little political
sympathy with the Republican Convention which nominated Mr.
Lincoln; but when he saw, as he did see for himself, his sturdy
adherence to a high moral principle, he returned an admirer of the
man, and a zealous advocate of his election.”
 XLI.
In the July following Mr. Lincoln’s inauguration, an extra session
of Congress was called. In the message then sent in, speaking of
secession, and the measures taken by the Southern leaders to bring
it about, there occurs the following sentence: “With rebellion thus
sugar-coated, they have been drugging the public mind of their
section for more than thirty years; until, at length, they have brought
many good men to a willingness to take up arms against the
government,” etc. Mr. Defrees, the government printer, told me that,
when the message was being printed, he was a good deal disturbed
by the use of the term “sugar-coated,” and finally went to the
President about it. Their relations to each other being of the most
intimate character, he told Mr. Lincoln frankly, that he ought to
remember that a message to Congress was a different affair from a
speech at a mass-meeting in Illinois; that the messages became a
part of history, and should be written accordingly.
“What is the matter now?” inquired the President.
“Why,” said Mr. Defrees, “you have used an undignified
expression in the message;” and then, reading the paragraph aloud,
he added, “I would alter the structure of that, if I were you.”
“Defrees,” replied Mr. Lincoln, “that word expresses precisely my
idea, and I am not going to change it. The time will never come in
this country when the people won’t know exactly what sugar-coated
means!”
On a subsequent occasion, Mr. Defrees told me, a certain
sentence of another message was very awkwardly constructed.
Calling the President’s attention to it in the proof-copy, the latter
acknowledged the force of the objection raised, and said, “Go home,
Defrees, and see if you can better it.” The next day Mr. Defrees took
in to him his amendment. Mr. Lincoln met him by saying: “Seward
found the same fault that you did, and he has been rewriting the
paragraph also.” Then, reading Mr. Defrees’s version, he said, “I
believe you have beaten Seward; but, ‘I jings,’ I think I can beat you
both.” Then, taking up his pen, he wrote the sentence as it was
finally printed.
Mr. George E. Baker, Mr. Seward’s private secretary, informed
me that he was much amused and interested in a phase of Mr.
Lincoln’s character which came under his own observation. It was
Mr. Baker’s province to take to the President all public documents
from the State Department requiring his signature. During the first
few months, Mr. Lincoln would read each paper carefully through,
always remarking, “I never sign a document I have not first read.” As
his cares increased, he at length departed from his habit so far as to
say to the messenger, “Won’t you read these papers to me?” This
went on for a few months, and he then modified this practice by
requesting “a synopsis of the contents.” His time became more and
more curtailed, and for the last year his only expression was, “Show
me where you want my name?”
It is not generally known that the speech always made by the
President, upon the presentation of a foreign minister, is carefully
written for him by the Secretary of State. A clerk in the department,
ignorant of this custom, was one day sent to the White House by Mr.
Seward, with the speech to be delivered upon such an occasion. Mr.
Lincoln was writing at his desk, as the clerk entered—a half-dozen
senators and representatives occupying the sofa and chairs. Unable
to disguise a feeling of delicacy, in the discharge of such an errand,
the young man approached, and in a low voice said to the President:
“The Secretary has sent the speech you are to make to-day to the
Swiss minister.” Mr. Lincoln laid down his pen, and, taking the
manuscript, said in a loud tone: “Oh, this is a speech Mr. Seward has
written for me, is it? I guess I will try it before these gentlemen, and
see how it goes.” Thereupon he proceeded to read it, in a waggish
manner, remarking, as he concluded, with sly humor: “There, I like
that. It has the merit of originality.”
“Within a month after Mr. Lincoln’s first accession to office,” says
the Hon. Mr. Raymond, “when the South was threatening civil war,
and armies of office-seekers were besieging him in the Executive
Mansion, he said to a friend that he wished he could get time to
attend to the Southern question; he thought he knew what was
wanted, and believed he could do something towards quieting the
rising discontent; but the office-seekers demanded all his time. ‘I
am,’ said he, ‘like a man so busy in letting rooms in one end of his
house, that he can’t stop to put out the fire that is burning the other.’
Two or three years later, when the people had made him a candidate
for reëlection, the same friend spoke to him of a member of his
Cabinet who was a candidate also. Mr. Lincoln said he did not
concern himself much about that. It was important to the country that
the department over which his rival presided should be administered
with vigor and energy, and whatever would stimulate the Secretary to
such action would do good. ‘R——,’ said he, ‘you were brought up
on a farm, were you not? Then you know what a chin fly is. My
brother and I,’ he added, ‘were once ploughing corn on a Kentucky
farm, I driving the horse, and he holding the plough. The horse was
lazy; but on one occasion rushed across the field so that I, with my
long legs, could scarcely keep pace with him. On reaching the end of
the furrow, I found an enormous chin fly fastened upon him, and
knocked him off. My brother asked me what I did that for. I told him I
didn’t want the old horse bitten in that way. “Why,” said my brother,
“that’s all that made him go!” Now,’ said Mr. Lincoln, ‘if Mr. —— has a
presidential chin fly biting him, I’m not going to knock him off, if it will
only make his department go.’
“On another occasion the President said he was in great
distress; he had been to General McClellan’s house, and the
General did not ask to see him; and as he must talk to somebody, he
had sent for General Franklin and myself, to obtain our opinion as to
the possibility of soon commencing active operations with the Army
of the Potomac. To use his own expression, if something was not
soon done, the bottom would fall out of the whole affair; and if
General McClellan did not want to use the army, he would like to
borrow it, provided he could see how it could be made to do
5
something.”
 XLII.
One bright morning in May, the Sunday-school children of the
city of Washington, marching in procession on anniversary day,
passed in review through the portico on the north side of the White
House. The President stood at the open window above the door,
responding with a smile and a bow to the lusty cheers of the little
folks as they passed. Hon. Mr. Odell, of Brooklyn, with one or two
other gentlemen, stood by his side as I joined the group. It was a
beautiful sight; the rosy-cheeked boys and girls, in their “Sunday’s
best,” with banners and flowers, all intent upon seeing the President,
and, as they caught sight of his tall figure, cheering as if their very
lives depended upon it. After enjoying the scene for some time,
making pleasant remarks about a face that now and then struck him,
Mr. Lincoln said: “Mrs. Ann S. Stephens told me a story last night
about Daniel Webster, when a lad, which was new to me, and it has
been running in my head all the morning. When quite young, at
school, Daniel was one day guilty of a gross violation of the rules. He
was detected in the act, and called up by the teacher for punishment.
This was to be the old-fashioned ‘feruling’ of the hand. His hands
happened to be very dirty. Knowing this, on his way to the teacher’s
desk, he spit upon the palm of his right hand, wiping it off upon the
side of his pantaloons. ‘Give me your hand, sir,’ said the teacher,
very sternly. Out went the right hand, partly cleansed. The teacher
looked at it a moment, and said, ‘Daniel, if you will find another hand
in this school-room as filthy as that, I will let you off this time!’
Instantly from behind his back came the left hand. ‘Here it is, sir,’
was the ready reply. ‘That will do,’ said the teacher, ‘for this time; you
can take your seat, sir.’”
Mr. Lincoln’s heart was always open to children. I shall never
forget his coming into the “studio” one day, and finding my own little
boy of two summers playing on the floor. A member of the Cabinet
was with him, but laying aside all restraint, he took the little fellow at
once in his arms, and they were soon on the best of terms.
Old Daniel—alluded to on a previous page—gave me a touching
illustration of this element in his character. A poor woman from
Philadelphia had been waiting with a baby in her arms for several
days to see the President. It appeared by her story, that her husband
had furnished a substitute for the army, but sometime afterward, in a
state of intoxication, was induced to enlist. Upon reaching the post
assigned his regiment, he deserted, thinking the government was not
entitled to his services. Returning home, he was arrested, tried,
convicted, and sentenced to be shot. The sentence was to be
executed on a Saturday. On Monday his wife left her home with her
baby, to endeavor to see the President. Said Daniel, “She had been
waiting here three days, and there was no chance for her to get in.
Late in the afternoon of the third day, the President was going
through the passage to his private room to get a cup of tea. On the
way he heard the baby cry. He instantly went back to his office and
rang the bell. ‘Daniel,’ said he, ‘is there a woman with a baby in the
anteroom?’ I said there was, and if he would allow me to say it, it
was a case he ought to see; for it was a matter of life and death.
Said he, ‘Send her to me at once.’ She went in, told her story, and
the President pardoned her husband. As the woman came out from
his presence, her eyes were lifted and her lips moving in prayer, the
tears streaming down her cheeks.” Said Daniel, “I went up to her,
and pulling her shawl, said, ‘Madam, it was the baby that did it.’”
When Mr. Lincoln visited New York in 1860, he felt a great
interest in many of the institutions for reforming criminals and saving
the young from a life of crime. Among others, he visited, unattended,
the Five Points’ House of Industry, and the Superintendent of the
Sabbath-school there gave the following account of the event:—
“One Sunday morning, I saw a tall, remarkable-looking man
enter the room and take a seat among us. He listened with fixed
attention to our exercises, and his countenance expressed such
genuine interest that I approached him and suggested that he might
be willing to say something to the children. He accepted the
invitation with evident pleasure; and, coming forward, began a
simple address, which at once fascinated every little hearer and
hushed the room into silence. His language was strikingly beautiful,
and his tones musical with intense feeling. The little faces would
droop into sad conviction as he uttered sentences of warning, and
would brighten into sunshine as he spoke cheerful words of promise.
Once or twice he attempted to close his remarks, but the imperative
shout of ‘Go on! Oh, do go on!’ would compel him to resume. As I
looked upon the gaunt and sinewy frame of the stranger, and marked
his powerful head and determined features, now touched into
softness by the impressions of the moment, I felt an irrepressible
curiosity to learn something more about him, and while he was
quietly leaving the room I begged to know his name. He courteously
replied, ‘It is Abraham Lincoln, from Illinois.’”
Mr. Nelson Sizer, one of the gallery ushers of Henry Ward
Beecher’s church in Brooklyn, told me that about the time of the
Cooper Institute speech, Mr. Lincoln was twice present at the
morning services of that church. On the first occasion, he was
accompanied by his friend, George B. Lincoln, Esq., and occupied a
prominent seat in the centre of the house. On a subsequent Sunday
morning, not long afterwards, the church was packed, as usual, and
the services had proceeded to the announcement of the text, when
the gallery door at the right of the organ-loft opened, and the tall
figure of Mr. Lincoln entered, alone. Again in the city over Sunday, he
started out by himself to find the church, which he reached
considerably behind time. Every seat was occupied; but the
gentlemanly usher at once surrendered his own, and, stepping back,
became much interested in watching the effect of the sermon upon
the western orator. As Mr. Beecher developed his line of argument,
Mr. Lincoln’s body swayed forward, his lips parted, and he seemed
at length entirely unconscious of his surroundings,—frequently giving
vent to his satisfaction, at a well-put point or illustration, with a kind
of involuntary Indian exclamation,—“ugh!”—not audible beyond his
immediate presence, but very expressive! Mr. Lincoln henceforward
had a profound admiration for the talents of the famous pastor of
Plymouth Church. He once remarked to the Rev. Henry M. Field, of
New York, in my presence, that “he thought there was not upon
record, in ancient or modern biography, so productive a mind, as had
been exhibited in the career of Henry Ward Beecher!”