Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Metabook - 133download Ebook Pharmacology of The WNT Signaling System 1St Edition Gunnar Schulte Online PDF All Chapter
Metabook - 133download Ebook Pharmacology of The WNT Signaling System 1St Edition Gunnar Schulte Online PDF All Chapter
Metabook - 133download Ebook Pharmacology of The WNT Signaling System 1St Edition Gunnar Schulte Online PDF All Chapter
https://ebookmeta.com/product/mapping-the-rockumentary-images-of-
sound-and-fury-1st-edition-gunnar-iversen/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/therapeutic-antibodies-methods-and-
protocols-1st-edition-gunnar-houen/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/lonely-planet-berlin-12th-edition-
andrea-schulte-peevers/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/principles-of-animal-
physiology-3rd-edition-christopher-d-moyes-patricia-m-schulte/
Fundamentals of Pharmacology, 9th Edition Bullock
https://ebookmeta.com/product/fundamentals-of-pharmacology-9th-
edition-bullock/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/unwatchable-nicholas-baer-maggie-
hennefeld-laura-horak-gunnar-iversen/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/tumor-microenvironment-signaling-
pathways-part-b-1st-edition-alexander-birbrair/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/mechanotransduction-cell-signaling-
to-cell-response-1st-edition-paul-sundaram/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/essentials-of-pharmacology-for-
nurses-barber/
Volume 269
Handbook of Experimental
Pharmacology
Editor-in-Chief
James E. Barrett
Center for Substance Abuse Research, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at
Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Editorial Board
Veit Flockerzi
Institute for Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology,
Saarland University, Homburg, Germany
Michael A. Frohman
Center for Developmental Genetics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook,
NY, USA
Pierangelo Geppetti
Headache Center, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
Franz B. Hofmann
Forschergruppe 923 Carvas, Technical University, München, Germany
Rohini Kuner
Institute of Pharmacology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
Martin C. Michel
Department of Pharmacology, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
Clive P. Page
SIPP, Kings College London, London, UK
KeWei Wang
School of Pharmacy, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
Pawel Kozielewicz
Department of Physiology & Pharmacology Section for Receptor
Biology & Signaling, Karolinska Institutet Biomedicum 6D, Stockholm,
Sweden
This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively
licensed by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is
concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of
illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in
any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and
retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or
dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed.
References
Schulte G (2010) International Union of Basic and Clinical
Pharmacology. LXXX. The class Frizzled receptors. Pharmacol Rev
62(4):632–667
van Amerongen R (2012) Alternative Wnt pathways and receptors.
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 4(10)
Willert K, Nusse R (2012) Wnt proteins. Cold Spring Harb Perspect
Biol 4(9):a007864
Gunnar Schulte
Pawel Kozielewicz
Stockholm, Sweden
Contents
Part I Basic Pharmacological Principles of the WNT Signaling
System
Controlling Wnt Signaling Specificity and Implications for
Targeting WNTs Pharmacologically
Pooja R. Sonavane and Karl Willert
Extracellular WNTs:Trafficking, Exosomes, and Ligand–Receptor
Interaction
Julia Christina Gross
LRPs in WNT Signalling
Gary Davidson
Targeting the Receptor Tyrosine Kinase ROR1 by Small Molecules
Mohammad Hojjat-Farsangi, Ali Moshfegh, Johan Schultz,
Martin Norin, Thomas Olin, Anders Ö sterborg and Hå kan Mellstedt
Employing Genetically Encoded, Biophysical Sensors to
Understand WNT/Frizzled Interaction and Receptor Complex
Activation
Pawel Kozielewicz, Hannes Schihada and Gunnar Schulte
Can We Pharmacologically Target Dishevelled:The Key Signal
Transducer in the Wnt Pathways?
Miroslav Micka and Vítězslav Bryja
Zooming in on the WNT/CTNNB1 Destruction Complex:Functional
Mechanistic Details with Implications for Therapeutic Targeting
Saskia Madelon Ada de Man and Renée van Amerongen
An Overview of Potential Therapeutic Agents Targeting WNT/PCP
Signaling
Jin Wang, Di Feng and Bo Gao
Mining Natural Compounds to Target WNT Signaling:Land and Sea
Tales
Vladimir L. Katanaev, Artem Blagodatski, Jiabin Xu,
Yuri Khotimchenko and Alexey Koval
Part II Disease-Specific Targeting of the WNT Signaling System
Frizzled7 Activates β-Catenin-Dependent and β-Catenin-
Independent Wnt Signalling Pathways During Developmental
Morphogenesis: Implications for Therapeutic Targeting in
Colorectal Cancer
Bang Manh Tran, Dustin James Flanagan, Toby James Phesse and
Elizabeth Vincan
Targeting Oncogenic WNT Signalling with WNT Signalling-Derived
Peptides
Vikas Yadav, Njainday Jobe, Lubna Mehdawi and Tommy Andersson
WNT Signalling in Lung Physiology and Pathology
Yan Hu, Chiara Ciminieri, Qianjiang Hu, Mareike Lehmann,
Melanie Kö nigshoff and Reinoud Gosens
WNT Signalling in Osteoarthritis and Its Pharmacological
Targeting
Anna De Palma and Giovanna Nalesso
WNT Signaling Is a Key Player in Alzheimer’s Disease
Nibaldo C. Inestrosa, Cheril Tapia-Rojas, Waldo Cerpa,
Pedro Cisternas and Juan M. Zolezzi
Pharmacologically Targeting the WNT/β-Catenin Signaling
Cascade:Avoiding the Sword of Damocles
Keane K. Y. Lai and Michael Kahn
Part I
Basic Pharmacological Principles of the
WNT Signaling System
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021
G. Schulte, P. Kozielewicz (eds.), Pharmacology of the WNT Signaling System,
Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology 269
https://doi.org/10.1007/164_2021_529
Karl Willert
Email: kwillert@health.ucsd.edu
1 Introduction
2 Wnt Processing and Secretion
3 Wnt Signaling
4 Wnt Signaling Specificity
5 Engineered Specificity
6 Targeting Wnt in Disease
6.1 Cancer
6.2 Tissue Regeneration and Repair
7 Concluding Remarks
References
Abstract
Wnt signaling is critical for proper development of the embryo and for
tissue homeostasis in the adult. Activation of this signaling cascade is
initiated by binding of the secreted Wnts to their receptors. With the
mammalian genome encoding multiple Wnts and Wnt receptors, a
longstanding question in the field has been how Wnt-receptor
specificities are achieved. Emerging from these studies is a picture of
exquisite control over Wnt protein production, secretion, distribution,
and receptor interactions, culminating in activation of downstream
signaling cascades that control a myriad of biological processes. Here
we discuss mechanisms by which Wnt protein activities are tuned and
illustrate how the multiple layers of regulation can be leveraged for
therapeutic interventions in disease.
1 Introduction
Wnt proteins are a family of secreted growth factors with critical roles
in organizing and assembling the body plan of all metazoan species.
The defining feature of all Wnts is a nearly invariant pattern of 22
cysteines across 350–400 amino acids that form disulfide linkages to
yield a globular 2-domain protein of approximately 40 kDa, the
structure of which has been likened to that of a hand with a thumb and
index finger capable of grasping the extracellular domains of their
cognate receptors (Janda et al. 2012).
The diverse biological activities attributed to Wnts across all animal
species can be unified as that of symmetry breaking signals, specifying
the polarity of individual cells within developing tissues to eventually
yield the complex patterns that define individual tissues and the whole
organism. This symmetry breaking property derives from the fact that
Wnts act locally and are rarely found at distances greater than a few cell
diameters from their site of synthesis, a property afforded by a
covalently attached lipid (Willert et al. 2003).
This article will focus on these Wnt proteins and how interactions
with a variety of proteins and extracellular structures regulate their
signaling activity and specificity. Upon engaging cell surface receptor
complexes, Wnts activate intracellular signaling cascades that have
been the subject of many studies and the focus of other review articles.
We will also discuss how this complex network of protein interactions
in the extracellular environment has been leveraged to manipulate Wnt
signaling and develop novel approaches to target and exploit this
pathway for therapeutic applications.
3 Wnt Signaling
Many review articles, including in this book volume, have been
dedicated to the mechanisms of Wnt signaling downstream of the
receptors. For brevity-sake – and risking oversimplification – we will
pare down Wnt signaling to two pathways, the Wnt/β-catenin pathway
and the alternative Wnt pathway, commonly referred to as the
canonical and non-canonical Wnt pathway, respectively.
Wnt/β-catenin signaling is initiated when a Wnt protein
heterodimerizes Fzd with a co-receptor encoded by Lrp5/6. Compelling
evidence for Wnt-mediated heterodimerization of Fzd and Lrp5/6
derives from the use of engineered recombinant proteins capable of
simultaneously binding each receptor to activate downstream signaling
(further details on these engineered Wnt-like proteins follow below).
The key downstream effector of this pathway is β-catenin, which
becomes stabilized and subsequently enters the nucleus to activate
expression of target genes. The list of known Wnt target genes is
extensive with many being activated in a tissue and context dependent
manner. Axin2 is considered a universal Wnt target gene (Jho et al.
2002; Lustig et al. 2002), a feature that has been leveraged to trace
developmental lineages of cells that have received an early Wnt signal
(van Amerongen et al. 2012a). In contrast, expression of the Wnt target
gene Sp5, a transcription factor that in part acts to rein in expression of
Wnt target genes, including itself, is restricted to cell populations with
broad developmental potential, such as stem cells (Huggins et al. 2017).
In contrast to the Wnt/β-catenin pathway, alternative Wnt signaling
pathways are thought to be initiated by Wnt binding Fzd and multiple
other co-receptors, in particular the receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs)
Ror1, Ror2, Ryk, and Ptk7, all of which contain pseudokinase domains
(Sheetz et al. 2020) (Fig. 2). The extent to which Wnts heterodimerize
Fzd and these alternate co-receptors is not as well established as it is
for Fzd-Lrp5/6. However, Wnts can bind FZDs without engaging co-
receptors, as well as act in concert with FZD and these atypical RTKs to
promote a variety of downstream effects, including the establishment
of cell polarity across an epithelium, convergent extension (CE) as seen,
for example, during gastrulation and neural tube closure, and other
complex biological processes that establish form and shape during
development. Of note, in contrast to Wnt/β-catenin signaling, which
regulates gene expression, very few robust transcriptional targets have
been identified downstream of these alternative Wnt signaling events.
Rather, these alternate Wnt pathways may act directly on the proteome,
as illustrated by Wnt5a/Ror regulating the stability of Kif26b (Susman
et al. 2017).
Fig. 2 Wnt receptors, co-receptors, and accessory factors. Wnt proteins bind to a
wide range of cell surface receptors, with Fzd1-10 being the primary receptors and
Lrp5/6, Ror1/2, Ryk, and Ptk being critical co-receptors. Accessory receptors such
as Egfr, Grp124, and Reck facilitate signal transduction in a Wnt-specific manner
Wnt5a is a well-established ligand for Ror1 and 2, and loss of
function mutations in Wnt5a phenocopy Ror1/2 double mutants (Ho et
al. 2012; Nomi et al. 2001). Wnt5a has also been shown to draw Fzd
and Ror2 into a complex to promote downstream signal transduction
involving Dvl polymerization and Rac1 activation (Nishita et al. 2010).
Since the extracellular domains of Fzd and Ror are related, it is
conceivable that Fzd-Ror heterodimer formation is structurally similar
to Fzd-Fzd homodimer formation, however, this has not been confirmed
experimentally. Furthermore, receptor oligomerization can occur
independently of the CRDs through interactions of the transmembrane
domains, as shown for Fzd1 (Kaykas et al. 2004) and FZD6 (Petersen et
al. 2017). Wnt5a can also promote Ror1-Ror2 heterodimerization to
recruit guanine nucleotide exchange factors and activate RhoA and
Rac1 (Yu et al. 2016). Although Wnt5a is a frequent participant in these
alternate Wnt pathways, several other Wnts have been found to signal
through Ror1/2, Ryk, and Ptk7, for example, Wnt11 acting through
Fzd7 and Ryk to affect CE in Xenopus (Kim et al. 2008a), Wnt4
interacting with Ptk7 (also known as Otk) to inhibit Wnt/β-catenin
signaling during embryonic patterning of Drosophila (Peradziryi et al.
2011), Wnt9a genetically interacting with Ror1/2 to regulate skeletal
development in mice (Weissenbock et al. 2019), to name a few.
A pervasive misconception is that individual Wnts can be classified
into distinct classes, those that activate the Wnt/β-catenin pathway and
those that activate the alternative Wnt pathway. However, depending on
cellular context, a specific Wnt can couple to either pathway. For
example, Wnt5a has been associated with alternative Wnt signaling,
interacting with Ror1/2 to promote midgut elongation (Ho et al. 2012;
Yamada et al. 2010). However, in certain contexts, such as ectopic
expression of Fzd4 in mouse cells (Mikels and Nusse 2006) or Fzd5 in
Xenopus embryos (He et al. 1997), Wnt5a activates the Wnt/β-catenin
pathway, illustrating that individual Wnt proteins can stimulate
multiple signaling pathways (van Amerongen et al. 2012b).
In the extracellular space, multiple factors directly or indirectly
restrain Wnt signaling activity. For example, several secreted molecules,
such as secreted frizzled related proteins (Sfrp), Wnt inhibitory factor
(Wif), and Cerberus (Cer), act as receptor decoys and bind Wnts to
prevent their interaction with receptors. Other proteins enzymatically
modify and inactivate Wnts, such as Notum, which cleaves the lipid
moiety (Kakugawa et al. 2015), and Tiki (TRABD2A/B), which cleaves
amino terminal amino acids (Zhang et al. 2012). Inhibitory factors, such
as Dkk and Sost, bind Lrp5/6 (Li et al. 2005; Mao et al. 2001) to prevent
Wnt-mediated receptor heterodimerization (Fig. 1). Several of these
negative regulators of Wnt proteins are direct target genes of the Wnt/
β-catenin pathway, thereby establishing negative feedback loops that
are critical to permit progression of developmental processes.
An especially fascinating class of secreted factors influencing Wnt
signaling activity are the R-spondins (Rspo1,2,3,4) (Kim et al. 2008b).
These proteins serve to stabilize Fzd proteins on the cell surface,
thereby sensitizing cells to the incoming Wnt protein. Initially identified
to be ligands for the widely studied intestinal stem cell marker Lgr5 (as
well as the related Lgr4 and 6 receptors) (Carmon et al. 2011; de Lau et
al. 2011), Rspos also bind the membrane-spanning E3 ubiquitin ligases
Znrf3 and Rnf43, thereby sequestering them and consequently blocking
Fzd ubiquitination and downregulation. Although it is clear from
structural studies that Rspo forms a ternary complex with Lgr5 and
these E3 ligases (Zebisch and Jones 2015), Rspo can act independently
of the Lgrs to inhibit Rnf43 and Znrf3 activity (Szenker-Ravi et al.
2018).
6.1 Cancer
Since the discovery of the first mammalian Wnt gene, Wnt1, originally
called int-1, in the context of mouse mammary tumors (Nusse and
Varmus 1982) and demonstration of its oncogenic potential
(Tsukamoto et al. 1988), the Wnt field has been inextricably tied to
cancer biology. The majority of cancer-associated mutations in the Wnt
pathway are in intracellular signaling components, such as APC, Axin
and β-catenin, that control the stability of the downstream effector β-
catenin. For example, a comprehensive molecular characterization of
colorectal cancers (CRC) found Wnt pathway alterations in 93% of
cases, with the majority being biallelic inactivation of APC and
activating mutations of β-catenin (Cancer Genome Atlas Network
2012), leading to stabilization of β-catenin and ensuing activation of
downstream target genes, such as c-Myc (He et al. 1998), a regulator of
proliferation and cell cycle progression.
Mutations in Wnt genes are largely loss-of-function and produce
developmental defects rather than promote cancer. Instead, cancer-
associated Wnt pathway alterations upstream of receptors include
overexpression of Wnt genes and silencing of Wnt antagonists,
underscoring opportunities for therapeutic intervention in cancer
through Wnt pathway inhibition. As mentioned above, Wnt processing
and secretion requires the activities of Porcn and Wls, and interfering
with either gene produces all-Wnt mutant phenotypes. Porcn inhibitors
have proven to be powerful allies in the treatment of the so-called Wnt-
addicted cancers. In particular, tumors harboring mutations in the
membrane-bound E3 ubiquitin ligases Rnf43 and Znrf3, which
downregulate Fzd cell surface expression, are highly susceptible to
Porcn inhibitors (Jiang et al. 2013; Koo et al. 2015; van de Wetering et
al. 2015; Yu et al. 2020). Likewise, Porcn inhibitors potently disrupt
growth of Rspo3-translocated cancers (Madan et al. 2016), which have
been observed in 10% of CRCs (Seshagiri et al. 2012). Porcn inhibitors
are also effective in cancers that are driven by Wnt overexpression in
the tumor microenvironment, as observed in the MMTV-Wnt1 mouse
model of mammary tumorigenesis (Proffitt et al. 2013) and in lung
adenocarcinomas where Porcn-positive niche cells promote Wnt
signaling (Tammela et al. 2017).
Aside from bone toxicity (Funck-Brentano et al. 2018), which can be
reduced with alendronate therapy (Madan et al. 2018), Porcn inhibitors
are surprisingly well tolerated, including in the intestine, which
requires continuous Wnt secretion from subepithelial myofibroblasts
(Greicius et al. 2018). The lack of gut toxicity is explained by high
expression levels of drug transporters, such as Mrp1 and Abcc1 that
lower intracellular Porcn inhibitor levels, in the Wnt secreting intestinal
myofibroblasts, a mechanism that presumably evolved to protect the
intestinal stem cell niche from environmental insults (Chee et al. 2018).
Small molecule Wls inhibitors have not yet been developed,
however, one study demonstrated that a monoclonal Wls antibody
could reduce Wnt secretion, perhaps through blocking retrograde
transport of Wls to the ER via the retromer complex, and inhibit
proliferation of gastric cancer cells and suppress tumorigenesis vivo
(Seo et al. 2018). The recent description of a Wls-Wnt co-crystal
structure (Nygaard et al. 2021) will likely aid in the development of
drugs to block Wls function.
Additional approaches to interfere with Wnt proteins is through the
use peptides and proteins, native or engineered, that bind, sequester, or
modify Wnts. For example, several Wnt-specific antibodies have been
developed and shown to block various aspects of cancer cell growth,
mostly in cell culture (Hanaki et al. 2012; He et al. 2004; Rhee et al.
2002; You et al. 2004). However, to date, no Wnt-specific antibodies
have advanced to clinical studies or been approved for clinical use. A
decoy receptor comprised of the FZD8 CRD fused to the Fc portion of a
human immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1), called Ipafricept (OMP-54F28),
binds and effectively sequesters Wnt proteins (Fischer et al. 2017), and
Phase 1 studies in hepatocellular, ovarian, and pancreatic cancers have
been completed, however, significant bone toxicity was observed at
efficacious doses, thus limiting further development (Moore et al.
2019).
Another viable approach is to interfere with Rspo, secreted proteins
that potently augment Wnt activity through upregulation of Fzds. An
anti-RSPO3 antibody (Rosmantuzumab/OMP-131R10) did not progress
beyond Phase 1 studies for treatment of advanced solid tumors,
however, this antibody may be efficacious for other indications, such as
attenuation of liver fibrosis (Zhang et al. 2020a).
Targeting Wnt receptors in cancer has also been explored. A pan-
specific FZD antibody that binds FZD1, 2, 5, 7, 8, called Vantictumab/OMP-
18R5 potently inhibited Wnt signaling and growth of xenografted
FZD7-positive tumors (Gurney et al. 2012). Phase 1 clinical studies
were terminated due to adverse side effects, in particular in bone,
which were likely due to lack of targeting the pathway in an FZD
subtype selective manner, a problem that may be overcome by
developing antibodies with greater selectivity for individual FZDs.
Limited expression in adult tissues or onco-fetal expression profiles,
as is the case for ROR1 (Fukuda et al. 2008), can be exploited with
genetically engineered autologous T-lymphocytes carrying chimeric
antigen receptors (Berger et al. 2015). Wnt receptors with tumor cell-
restricted expression can also be targeted with antibody drug
conjugates, as is the case for ROR1 (Vaisitti et al. 2021) and Ptk7
(Damelin et al. 2017).
Although Wnt pathway activation is generally associated with
tumorigenesis, there are exceptions, as illustrated by Wnt5a and Dkk1.
Loss of Wnt5a, which is linked to alternative Wnt signaling pathways
and capable of antagonizing Wnt/β-catenin signaling, either by
mutation or downregulation, is associated with haematopoietic
malignancies, indicating a tumor suppressive function for Wnt5a (Liang
et al. 2003). Paradoxically, Wnt5a overexpression has also been
observed in multiple cancers, including breast, prostate, skin, and
stomach, where it promotes cell migration and invasion in cancer cell
lines, effects that can be blocked with anti-Wnt5a antibodies (Hanaki et
al. 2012) or with Box 5, a butyloxycarbonyl-modified Wnt5a-derived
hexapeptide (Jenei et al. 2009). Conversely, a related hexapeptide,
called Foxy-5, can mimic Wnt5a signaling and block migration and
invasion of breast cancer cells (Sä fholm et al. 2006). The disparate
effects of Wnt5a in cancer can be attributed in part to differences in the
tumor microenvironment, as well as to distinct Wnt5a isoforms
expressed from alternative promoters to produce Wnt5a proteins with
differing amino-termini (Bauer et al. 2013; Huang et al. 2017).
Dkk1, a well-established Wnt antagonist that binds the co-receptors
Lrp5 and 6, offers another paradoxical example: on the one hand, Dkk1
acts as a tumor suppressor by inhibiting Wnt/β-catenin signaling and,
on the other hand, it can promote tumor growth. One mechanism to
explain Dkk1’s tumor promoting activity is through its interaction with
cytoskeleton-associated protein 4 (Ckap4), leading to AKT activation
and promoting cancer cell proliferation (Shinno et al. 2018).
Furthermore, Dkk1 has well-documented immunomodulatory
properties (D'Amico et al. 2016; Malladi et al. 2016). These
observations have spurred the development of neutralizing DKK1
antibodies, including DKN-01 and BHQ880, both of which entered
clinical studies for the treatment of a variety of malignancies.
7 Concluding Remarks
The nearly four decades of extensive research in the Wnt field have
yielded important insights into a broad spectrum of biology and across
the entire animal kingdom. With their role as symmetry breaking
signals, Wnts and their downstream signaling cascades participate in
the establishment and organization of cell and spatial identity. The
complex layers of inhibitory and stimulatory regulation that fine-tune
Wnt activities offer fertile ground for continued scientific investigation
and discovery, as well as countless opportunities for clinical
development of therapies that target cancer and degenerative
disorders. To avoid adverse side effects in the clinic, such as bone and
gut toxicity, it will be critical to devise approaches that activate or
inhibit Wnt pathways with great precision, selectivity and specificity.
Recent technological advances in biomedical research in general and in
the Wnt field specifically are paving the way towards new therapies for
currently incurable diseases.
References
Balemans W, Ebeling M, Patel N, Van Hul E, Olson P, Dioszegi M, Lacza C, Wuyts W,
Van Den Ende J, Willems P, Paes-Alves AF, Hill S, Bueno M, Ramos FJ, Tacconi P,
Dikkers FG, Stratakis C, Lindpaintner K, Vickery B, Foernzler D, Van Hul W (2001)
Increased bone density in sclerosteosis is due to the deficiency of a novel secreted
protein (SOST). Hum Mol Genet 10:537–543. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/10.5.537
[Crossref][PubMed]
Bhanot P, Fish M, Jemison JA, Nusse R, Nathans J, Cadigan KM (1999) Frizzled and
Dfrizzled-2 function as redundant receptors for wingless during Drosophila
embryonic development. Development 126:4175–4186
[Crossref]
Biechele S, Cox BJ, Rossant J (2011) Porcupine homolog is required for canonical Wnt
signaling and gastrulation in mouse embryos. Dev Biol 355:275–285. https://doi.org/
10.1016/j .ydbio.2011.04.029
[Crossref][PubMed]
Carmon KS, Gong X, Lin Q, Thomas A, Liu Q (2011) R-spondins function as ligands of
the orphan receptors LGR4 and LGR5 to regulate Wnt/beta-catenin signaling. Proc
Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:11452–11457. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1106083108
[Crossref][PubMed][PubMedCentral]
Chee YC, Pahnke J, Bunte R, Adsool VA, Madan B, Virshup DM (2018) Intrinsic
xenobiotic resistance of the intestinal stem cell niche. Dev Cell 46:681–695.e5.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j .devcel.2018.07.023
[Crossref][PubMed]
Chen B, Dodge ME, Tang W, Lu J, Ma Z, Fan CW, Wei S, Hao W, Kilgore J, Williams NS,
Roth MG, Amatruda JF, Chen C, Lum L (2009) Small molecule-mediated disruption of
Wnt-dependent signaling in tissue regeneration and cancer. Nat Chem Biol 5:100–
107. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.137
[Crossref][PubMed][PubMedCentral]
Chen H, Lu C, Ouyang B, Zhang H, Huang Z, Bhatia D, Lee SJ, Shah D, Sura A, Yeh WC, Li
Y (2020) Development of potent, selective surrogate WNT molecules and their
application in defining frizzled requirements. Cell Chem Biol 27:598–609.e4. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j .c hembiol.2020.02.009
[Crossref][PubMed]
Chidiac R, Abedin M, Macleod G, Yang A, Thibeault PE, Blazer LL, Adams JJ, Zhang L,
Roehrich H, Jo HN, Seshagiri S, Sidhu SS, Junge HJ, Angers S (2021) A Norrin/Wnt
surrogate antibody stimulates endothelial cell barrier function and rescues
retinopathy. EMBO Mol Med:e13977. https://doi.org/10.15252/emmm.202113977
Cho C, Smallwood PM, Nathans J (2017) Reck and Gpr124 are essential receptor
cofactors for Wnt7a/Wnt7b-specific signaling in mammalian CNS angiogenesis and
blood-brain barrier regulation. Neuron 95:1056–1073.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j .
neuron.2017.07.031
[Crossref][PubMed][PubMedCentral]
Choi MY, Widhopf GF 2nd, Ghia EM, Kidwell RL, Hasan MK, Yu J, Rassenti LZ, Chen L,
Chen Y, Pittman E, Pu M, Messer K, Prussak CE, Castro JE, Jamieson C, Kipps TJ (2018)
Phase I trial: cirmtuzumab inhibits ROR1 signaling and stemness signatures in
patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Cell Stem Cell 22:951–959.e3. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j .stem.2018.05.018
[Crossref][PubMed][PubMedCentral]
Chu ML, Ahn VE, Choi HJ, Daniels DL, Nusse R, Weis WI (2013) Structural studies of
Wnts and identification of an LRP6 binding site. Structure 21:1235–1242. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j .str.2013.05.006
[Crossref][PubMed][PubMedCentral]
Coyac BR, Leahy B, Li Z, Salvi G, Yin X, Brunski JB, Helms JA (2020) Bone formation
around unstable implants is enhanced by a WNT protein therapeutic in a preclinical
in vivo model. Clin Oral Implants Res 31:1125–1137. https://doi.org/10.1111/c lr.
13659
[Crossref][PubMed]
D’Amico L, Mahajan S, Capietto AH, Yang Z, Zamani A, Ricci B, Bumpass DB, Meyer M,
Su X, Wang-Gillam A, Weilbaecher K, Stewart SA, DeNardo DG, Faccio R (2016)
Dickkopf-related protein 1 (Dkk1) regulates the accumulation and function of
myeloid derived suppressor cells in cancer. J Exp Med 213:827–840. https://doi.org/
10.1084/j em.20150950
[Crossref][PubMed][PubMedCentral]
Dang LT, Miao Y, Ha A, Yuki K, Park K, Janda CY, Jude KM, Mohan K, Ha N, Vallon M,
Yuan J, Vilches-Moure JG, Kuo CJ, Garcia KC, Baker D (2019) Receptor subtype
discrimination using extensive shape complementary designed interfaces. Nat Struct
Mol Biol 26:407–414. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-019-0224-z
[Crossref][PubMed][PubMedCentral]
de Lau W, Barker N, Low TY, Koo BK, Li VS, Teunissen H, Kujala P, Haegebarth A,
Peters PJ, van de Wetering M, Stange DE, van Es JE, Guardavaccaro D, Schasfoort RB,
Mohri Y, Nishimori K, Mohammed S, Heck AJ, Clevers H (2011) Lgr5 homologues
associate with Wnt receptors and mediate R-spondin signalling. Nature 476:293–297.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10337
[Crossref]
DeBruine ZJ, Xu HE, Melcher K (2017b) Assembly and architecture of the Wnt/beta-
catenin signalosome at the membrane. Br J Pharmacol 174:4564–4574. https://doi.
org/10.1111/bph.14048
[Crossref][PubMed][PubMedCentral]
Fukuda T, Chen L, Endo T, Tang L, Lu D, Castro JE, Widhopf GF 2nd, Rassenti LZ,
Cantwell MJ, Prussak CE, Carson DA, Kipps TJ (2008) Antisera induced by infusions
of autologous Ad-CD154-leukemia B cells identify ROR1 as an oncofetal antigen and
receptor for Wnt5a. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:3047–3052. https://doi.org/10.
1073/pnas.0712148105
[Crossref][PubMed][PubMedCentral]
Grainger S, Richter J, Palazon RE, Pouget C, Lonquich B, Wirth S, Grassme KS, Herzog
W, Swift MR, Weinstein BM, Traver D, Willert K (2016) Wnt9a is required for the
aortic amplification of nascent hematopoietic stem cells. Cell Rep 17:1595–1606.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j .c elrep.2016.10.027
[Crossref][PubMed][PubMedCentral]
Gross JC, Chaudhary V, Bartscherer K, Boutros M (2012) Active Wnt proteins are
secreted on exosomes. Nat Cell Biol 14:1036–1045. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb2574
[Crossref][PubMed]
Grzeschik KH, Bornholdt D, Oeffner F, Konig A, del Carmen BM, Enders H, Fritz B,
Hertl M, Grasshoff U, Hofling K, Oji V, Paradisi M, Schuchardt C, Szalai Z, Tadini G,
Traupe H, Happle R (2007) Deficiency of PORCN, a regulator of Wnt signaling, is
associated with focal dermal hypoplasia. Nat Genet 39:833–835. https://doi.org/10.
1038/ng2052
[Crossref][PubMed]
Gumber D, Do M, Suresh Kumar N, Sonavane PR, Wu CCN, Cruz LS, Grainger S, Carson
D, Gaasterland T, Willert K (2020) Selective activation of FZD7 promotes
mesendodermal differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells. eLife 9. https://doi.
org/10.7554/eLife.63060
Hansen S, Nile AH, Mehta SC, Fuhrmann J, Hannoush RN (2019) Lead optimization
yields high affinity frizzled 7-targeting peptides that modulate Clostridium difficile
toxin B pathogenicity in epithelial cells. J Med Chem 62:7739–7750. https://doi.org/
10.1021/acs.j medchem.9b00500
[Crossref][PubMed]
He TC, Sparks AB, Rago C, Hermeking H, Zawel L, da Costa LT, Morin PJ, Vogelstein B,
Kinzler KW (1998) Identification of c-MYC as a target of the APC pathway. Science
281:1509–1512. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.281.5382.1509
[Crossref]
Ho HY, Susman MW, Bikoff JB, Ryu YK, Jonas AM, Hu L, Kuruvilla R, Greenberg ME
(2012) Wnt5a-Ror-Dishevelled signaling constitutes a core developmental pathway
that controls tissue morphogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:4044–4051.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1200421109
[Crossref][PubMed][PubMedCentral]
Huang TC, Lee PT, Wu MH, Huang CC, Ko CY, Lee YC, Lin DY, Cheng YW, Lee KH (2017)
Distinct roles and differential expression levels of Wnt5a mRNA isoforms in
colorectal cancer cells. PLoS One 12:e0181034. https://doi.org/10.1371/j ournal.
pone.0181034
[Crossref][PubMed][PubMedCentral]
Iyer SP, Beck JT, Stewart AK, Shah J, Kelly KR, Isaacs R, Bilic S, Sen S, Munshi NC
(2014) A phase IB multicentre dose-determination study of BHQ880 in combination
with anti-myeloma therapy and zoledronic acid in patients with relapsed or
refractory multiple myeloma and prior skeletal-related events. Br J Haematol
167:366–375. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.13056
[Crossref][PubMed]
Janda CY, Waghray D, Levin AM, Thomas C, Garcia KC (2012) Structural basis of Wnt
recognition by frizzled. Science 337:59–64. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1222879
[Crossref][PubMed][PubMedCentral]
Janda CY, Dang LT, You C, Chang J, de Lau W, Zhong ZA, Yan KS, Marecic O, Siepe D, Li
X, Moody JD, Williams BO, Clevers H, Piehler J, Baker D, Kuo CJ, Garcia KC (2017)
Surrogate Wnt agonists that phenocopy canonical Wnt and beta-catenin signalling.
Nature 545:234–237. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature22306
[Crossref][PubMed][PubMedCentral]
Jho EH, Zhang T, Domon C, Joo CK, Freund JN, Costantini F (2002) Wnt/beta-
catenin/Tcf signaling induces the transcription of Axin2, a negative regulator of the
signaling pathway. Mol Cell Biol 22:1172–1183. https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.22.4.
1172-1183.2002
[Crossref][PubMed][PubMedCentral]
Jiang J, Lan C, Li L, Yang D, Xia X, Liao Q, Fu W, Chen X, An S, Wang WE, Zeng C (2018)
A novel porcupine inhibitor blocks WNT pathways and attenuates cardiac
hypertrophy. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol basis Dis 1864:3459–3467. https://doi.org/
10.1016/j .bbadis.2018.07.035
[Crossref][PubMed]
Kakugawa S, Langton PF, Zebisch M, Howell S, Chang TH, Liu Y, Feizi T, Bineva G,
O'Reilly N, Snijders AP, Jones EY, Vincent JP (2015) Notum deacylates Wnt proteins
to suppress signalling activity. Nature 519:187–192. https://doi.org/10.1038/
nature14259
[Crossref][PubMed][PubMedCentral]
Kim KA, Wagle M, Tran K, Zhan X, Dixon MA, Liu S, Gros D, Korver W, Yonkovich S,
Tomasevic N, Binnerts M, Abo A (2008b) R-Spondin family members regulate the
Wnt pathway by a common mechanism. Mol Biol Cell 19:2588–2596. https://doi.
org/10.1091/mbc.E08-02-0187
[Crossref][PubMed][PubMedCentral]
Koo BK, van Es JH, van den Born M, Clevers H (2015) Porcupine inhibitor suppresses
paracrine Wnt-driven growth of Rnf43;Znrf3-mutant neoplasia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U
S A 112:7548–7550. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1508113112
[Crossref][PubMed][PubMedCentral]
Li X, Zhang Y, Kang H, Liu W, Liu P, Zhang J, Harris SE, Wu D (2005) Sclerostin binds to
LRP5/6 and antagonizes canonical Wnt signaling. J Biol Chem 280:19883–19887.
https://doi.org/10.1074/j bc.M413274200
[Crossref][PubMed]
Liang H, Chen Q, Coles AH, Anderson SJ, Pihan G, Bradley A, Gerstein R, Jurecic R,
Jones SN (2003) Wnt5a inhibits B cell proliferation and functions as a tumor
suppressor in hematopoietic tissue. Cancer Cell 4:349–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/
s1535-6108(03)00268-x
[Crossref][PubMed]
Liu J, Pan S, Hsieh MH, Ng N, Sun F, Wang T, Kasibhatla S, Schuller AG, Li AG, Cheng D,
Li J, Tompkins C, Pferdekamper A, Steffy A, Cheng J, Kowal C, Phung V, Guo G, Wang Y,
Graham MP, Flynn S, Brenner JC, Li C, Villarroel MC, Schultz PG, Wu X, McNamara P,
Sellers WR, Petruzzelli L, Boral AL, Seidel HM, McLaughlin ME, Che J, Carey TE,
Vanasse G, Harris JL (2013) Targeting Wnt-driven cancer through the inhibition of
porcupine by LGK974. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:20224–20229. https://doi.org/
10.1073/pnas.1314239110
[Crossref][PubMed][PubMedCentral]
Luga V, Zhang L, Viloria-Petit AM, Ogunjimi AA, Inanlou MR, Chiu E, Buchanan M,
Hosein AN, Basik M, Wrana JL (2012) Exosomes mediate stromal mobilization of
autocrine Wnt-PCP signaling in breast cancer cell migration. Cell 151:1542–1556.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j .c ell.2012.11.024
[Crossref][PubMed]
Madan B, Ke Z, Harmston N, Ho SY, Frois AO, Alam J, Jeyaraj DA, Pendharkar V, Ghosh
K, Virshup IH, Manoharan V, Ong EH, Sangthongpitag K, Hill J, Petretto E, Keller TH,
Lee MA, Matter A, Virshup DM (2016) Wnt addiction of genetically defined cancers
reversed by PORCN inhibition. Oncogene 35:2197–2207. https://doi.org/10.1038/
onc.2015.280
[Crossref][PubMed]
Madan B, McDonald MJ, Foxa GE, Diegel CR, Williams BO, Virshup DM (2018) Bone
loss from Wnt inhibition mitigated by concurrent alendronate therapy. Bone Res
6:17. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41413-018-0017-8
[Crossref][PubMed][PubMedCentral]
The antelopes, which are also driven out by winter, do not always
follow the same paths, but usually travel in the same direction. None
is more numerous or more frequently seen than the springbok, one
of the most graceful and beautiful gazelles with which we are
acquainted. Its unusual beauty and agility strike everyone who sees
it in its wild state, now walking with elastic step, now standing still to
feed, now springing about in playful leaps, and thus disclosing its
greatest ornament, a mane-like snow-white tuft of hair, which at a
quieter pace is hidden in a longitudinal groove of the back. None of
the other antelopes, when forced to migrate, assemble in such
numerous herds as this one. Even the most vivid description cannot
convey to one who has not seen a herd of springboks on their
journey any adequate idea of the wonderful spectacle. After having
congregated for weeks, perhaps waiting for the first shower of rain,
the springboks at last resolve to migrate. Hundreds of the species
join other hundreds, thousands other thousands, and the more
threatening the scarcity, the more torturing the thirst, the longer the
distances which they cover; the flocks become herds, the herds
armies, and these resemble the swarms of locusts which darken the
sun. In the plains they cover square miles; in the passes between
the mountains they throng together in a compact mass which no
other creature can resist; over the low grounds they pour, like a
stream which has overflowed its banks and carries all before it.
Bewildering, intoxicating, and stupefying even the calmest of men,
the throng surges past for hours, perhaps days together.[61] Like the
greedy locusts, the famishing animals fall upon grass and leaves,
grain, and other fruits of the field; where they have passed, not a
blade is left. The man who comes in contact with them is at once
thrown to the ground, and so sorely wounded by the tread of their
hoofs, light indeed, but a thousand times repeated, that he may be
glad if he escapes with his life; a herd of sheep feeding in the way is
surrounded and carried off, never to be seen again; a lion, who
thought to gain an easy prey, finds himself forced to relinquish his
victim, and to travel with the stream. Unceasingly those behind press
forward, and those in front yield slowly to the pressure; those cooped
up in the middle strive continually to reach the wings, and their
efforts are strenuously resisted. Above the clouds of dust raised by
the rushing army the vultures circle; flanks and rear are attended by
a funeral procession of various beasts of prey; in the passes lurk
sportsmen, who send shot after shot into the throng. So the tortured
animals travel for many miles, till at length spring sets in and their
armies are broken up.
Shall I go on to consider other compulsory migrations, such as those
of the arctic foxes and polar bears when an ice-floe on which they
were hunting is loosened and floated off by the waves till, under
favourable circumstances, it touches some island? I think not, for
journeys such as these are not migrations, they are simply passive
driftings.