Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lab 4 - Speech Intelligibility (AIDS) - STUDENT HANDOUT
Lab 4 - Speech Intelligibility (AIDS) - STUDENT HANDOUT
As you have learned, an assessment task which can provide objective data about a client's
articulation and overall intelligibility, is the Assessment of Intelligibility of Dysarthric Speech
(AIDS) (Yorkston & Beukelman 1984)
Go to a computer.
F. Open the file Ax.May23.NN (words & sentences) under the Week 4 tab on eClass.
G. You will be listening to a recording of a client with Dysarthria, secondary to
Parkinson’s Disease, and transcribing/writing down what you hear.
ACTIVITY 1: Intelligibility at word level
Write the word beside the number stated. Any words you don’t understand, mark an X.
1. 18. 35.
2. 19. 36.
3. 20. 37.
4. 21. 38.
5. 22. 39.
6. 23. 40.
7. 24. 41.
8. 25. 42.
9. 26. 43.
17. 34.
L. Compare what you heard to the actual words the client read aloud (see Appendix B
on eClass).
■ Then calculate the % intelligibility score.
■ The words that you correctly identified divided by the total number of words
(50)
Word level 50 =
Write the sentence beside the number stated by the clinician. Any words you don’t
understand, mark an XXX.
5A __________________________________________________________________________
5B __________________________________________________________________________
6A __________________________________________________________________________
6B __________________________________________________________________________
7A __________________________________________________________________________
7B __________________________________________________________________________
8A __________________________________________________________________________
8B __________________________________________________________________________
9A __________________________________________________________________________
9B __________________________________________________________________________
10A __________________________________________________________________________
10B _________________________________________________________________________
11A __________________________________________________________________________
11B __________________________________________________________________________
12A _________________________________________________________________________
12B __________________________________________________________________________
13A __________________________________________________________________________
13B __________________________________________________________________________
14A __________________________________________________________________________
14B __________________________________________________________________________
15A __________________________________________________________________________
15B __________________________________________________________________________
D. Compare what you heard to the actual sentences (see Appendix D on eClass).
■ Then calculate the % intelligibility score.
■ Count up the words that were correctly identified divided by the total number
of words (220)
■ Note: The word you hear must exactly match the word that what written/that
the client said. For example, if you heard “dies” and he said “died”, it is
wrong. Even though this is close, you will be splitting hairs if you do this for all
the words that were close.
Questions:
1. The unfamiliar listener who initially analyzed these recordings, received the following
intelligibility scores: Word level intelligibility: 48% (see Appendix C on eClass) and
Sentence level intelligibility: 82% (see Appendix E on eClass)
a) How does this compare to your own ratings?
b) What could lead to differences in the % intelligibility?
2. Why do you think that the client was more intelligible at sentence level than at word
level?
3. What speech system(s) do you think are impaired with this client?
a) Respiration
b) Phonation
c) Nasality
d) Articulation
e) Prosody