[CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION TEMPORARILY DECLASSIFIED - CIA - INTERPOL]

Date of Publication: 05/21/2024

Sole Author: Shawn Dexter John

—-------------------------------------------------------------

Legal and Political Tenets of the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States

—-------------------------------------------------------------

The Legal and Political Tenets of relation are as follows:

(1) All individuals, both residents and citizens, shall be thoroughly competent in keeping
their residential, personal, private, and intellectual properties without a threat to their
privacy imposed due to this reality or due to any illicit discrimination conceived,
(2) There shall be no threat posed against any individual within the United States, American
born or otherwise, who shall be subjected to the breach of his or her person (his
anatomy and honest extent) (to be preserved in a manner which does not violate
criminal law), the privacy protecting his or her comfort via his or her person, and the
freedom of all individuals to refrain from interacting with others of close or distant
proximity,
(3) There shall be no cause of any individual or entity, private or public, which shall serve to
disqualify any individual from enjoying his or her privacy and his or her access to all
accounts, instruments, assets, capital, resources, and spaces reserved for comforting or
ameliorating his or her privacy,
(4) There shall be no conduct of Government or Civil Society which shall communicate or
help effect that residential, intellectual, private, or personal property may be seized or
surveilled arbitrarily (or damaged beyond or made depreciative of its standard of comfort
[or competently gained expectation]),
(5) There shall be no condition of communication or messaging (or their articulation)
between or amongst individuals, households, and private entities which shall be
perceived as inherently that of Government or any nominal industry; there shall be no
public entity which shall be perceived as deceptive to any point of human or
constitutional rights abuse or the violation of federal statutes, though the personal
communications of individuals within government are not to be perceived as inherently
that of Government, if not of formal government assignment, and
 (6) There shall be no decree or order, or any internal or public policy, which shall deprive
any person of any of the legal, political, and social protections articulated here.

—-------------------------------------------------------------

Re: The fourth amendment of the Constitution of the United States provides profound
security to the American people. This particular safeguard is employed in enjoying real
property, enables the security of person, and secures personal property including
privately-held correspondences, records, and such. Essentially, this amendment
provides that every individual should be secure in his or her privacy and that every
person should be safe from physical harm and in keeping unbreached property. Every
individual is free to preserve, reasonably, the effected comfort gained in enjoying any of
these.

No individual should be subjected to arbitrary or unreasonable searches, to arbitrary or

unreasonable seizure of one’s property with regard to the practices of government
entities. To evade arbitrary action, it is required that government find probable cause in
issuing any warrant for search or seizure – warrants are necessary with some
exceptions. The warrants are to be well-detailed, providing the location of any
requested search and the specific item(s) and/or individual(s) targeted in requesting
seizure permission. Government actors are to be honest in their requests, are to assert
their honesty by sworn oath or conveyed affirmation. The related protocol of
government should reflect prudence, transparency, and rigid fairness. (Governments
are to be responsible in possessing arrested property, in returning or releasing it.
Governments are to be sharply reasonable in arresting and detaining individuals.
Interfering with the freedom enjoyed by an individual cannot be arbitrarily or
unreasonably performed by any form of authority.)

Note:

1. Emergency circumstances, specifically the observation of live criminal activity

or credible & heightened suspicion by law enforcement, loosen the warrant
requirement. Reasonability requires credibility and notable arousal in
discriminating searched subjects and arrestees. Concerning arrestees,
credible evidence is a stern pre-requisite regarding the process of lawful
detainment. The U.S. Supreme Court’s usage of the “reasonable suspicion
standard” does inherently present general elements for certifying satisfaction
per the level of scrutiny demanded by the Fourth Amendment. Here, in this
note, I am using language which meets the necessary level of satisfaction in
both American and international jurisprudence.
References:

1. Legal Information Institute (Cornell law school website). Fourth Amendment,

http://www.law.cornell.edu.
2. Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968).

CIA-INTERPOL Partnership File Number: 1743BNWITY3527