Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 s2.0 S0263224122013768 Main
1 s2.0 S0263224122013768 Main
PII: S0263-2241(22)01376-8
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2022.112180
Reference: MEASUR 112180
Please cite this article as: T. Ghanbari, A. Mehraban, E. Farjah, Inter-turn Fault Detection of Induction Motors
Using a Method Based on Spectrogram of Motor Currents, Measurement (2022), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/
j.measurement.2022.112180
This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover
page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version
will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are
providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors
may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
in I p cos( 0 n ) (2)
2.2 Spectrogram and the Proposed Detection
Criterion Implementation
in which, Ip is the current amplitude,ω0=2πf0/fs, where f0
Now, the spectrogram of the residual current is derived
and fs are the fundamental and sampling frequencies,
to have a frequency-time domain representation of the
respectively, and n is the sample index. Based on basic
signal. The spectrogram is an expression of time-
trigonometric principles, in can be recursively calculated
localized frequency contents for a given signal. To
as:
achieve the spectrogram, Short-Time Fourier Transform
(STFT) of the signal u(τ) should be derived. At time t = τ ,
in 1 in 2 cos( 0 n )in n (3)
STFT is obtained by multiplying u(τ) using window
function w(τ) centered at τ = t as:
where χn is a random term with zero mean, added to
denote the model’s possible error. This term has small Fsw (t , f ) u ( ) w(t ) (8)
amplitude, phase, or frequency deviations. The input f
( x j x )
S sw (t , f ) Fsw (t , f )
2 z
j 1
2
u ( ) w(t ) (9) The skewness is a measure of the asymmetry of the
f
distribution and the higher value shows more deviation
2
from the center of the normal distribution.
u ( ) w(t )e 2 j f d
For the healthy case of the typical example, the kurtosis
and skewness are 14.2332 and 3.3431, respectively, and
In Fig. 2-a, b, the spectrograms of the residual signal for the faulty case, they are 27.2744, 4.6745, respectively.
for one cycle of 3s typical healthy modal signal and a These results indicate that both kurtosis and skewness
modal signal for 7% of ITSC fault are shown. In the indices experience a considerable deviation in faulty and
spectrogram analysis, the Hamming window is selected healthy conditions. In order to have the effect of both
with the width and overlap of 15ms and 50%, respectively. features for evaluation of the histogram, a cumulative
Also, the frequency resolution is 2.5Hz. It should be noted index is considered as the criterion for the detection.
that unsuitable selection of these parameters may affect 2.3 The Proposed Otsu-Based Thresholding Method
the performance of the method.
The spectrogram images are converted to gray-level 2.3.1 Otsu’s method
images, and their histograms are extracted. The Otsu’s method [29] is a statistical segmentation analysis,
corresponding histograms of the spectrogram images aimed to separate the pixels of an image into two classes
shown in Fig 2 are presented in Fig 3. As shown in Fig.3- with respect to their intensity values. A threshold is
a, b, the deviation of the histogram distribution from the determined between the separated classes in which intra-
standard normal distribution is different in healthy and class variance of the classes is maximized, using the
fault conditions. This signature is used for the detection histogram of the image [30].
considering kurtosis and skewness of the distributions. Given that the gray-level digital image has a total number
Kurtosis and Skewness are two features that express of N pixels, and L different intensity levels, so that the kth
the shape of data distribution and refer to the deviation intensity level has nk pixels in the image. The normalized
from the standard normal distribution. The kurtosis of a histogram includes components p k n k N in which:
set of data like x = {x1, x2… xz} is stated as:
L 1
1 z
( x j x )4
z j 1
p
k 0
k 1, pk 0 (12)
Kurt 2 (10)
1 z
( x j x ) Now, suppose that with a predefined threshold at k = tr
2
ic2 1 1 L 2 2 L
2 2
(20)
12 1 2
2
L 1
L2 k L pk
2
(21)
k 0
signal.
Fig. 5. The proposed ITSC fault detection methodology
3.2 The scenarios:
rewound such that different branches of the three phases
are available in an external terminal box for realizing The experimental setup is employed for data acquisition
different ITSC faults scenarios. Each ITSC fault scenario of different scenarios. These scenarios are performed by
is realized by short circuiting the corresponding terminals combining various ITSC faults and loading conditions as
using a Siemens auxiliary switch block with the shortest listed in Table 2. The under-study IM has 6 coils for each
possible connection wire length. Since, short-circuit phase, each coil has 300 turns, resulting total 1800 turns
resistance of the switch and connections was negligible, per phase. Therefore, 2%, 4%, 7% of turns correspond to
the short circuiting could be considered solidly. The IM is 36, 72, and 126 turns, respectively. For each loading level
directly connected to a three-phase supply and its rotor of the IM, different fault percentages are applied and the
shaft is coupled with the shaft of a DC Machine (DCM), three-phase currents are gathered to achieve the modal
operating as a generator. The output terminals of the current. These cases provide 4×8 = 32 different
DCM are connected to a variable resistive load. Three scenarios, which can fully describe the real operating
clamped current sensors are attached to the IM’s supply conditions of the IM.
cables and their outputs are imported to a LAUNCHXL- 3.3 Assessment of the results of all test scenarios:
F28379D board, produced by TEXAS Instrument. The
Table 3 shows the calculated values of kurtosis and
three-phase currents data for various scenarios are
skewness for the experimental outputs derived for all of
gathered through a computer by a sampling frequency of
the 32 test scenarios. Also, the cumulative normalized
10 kHz in 3 s, generating a total of 30,000 samples per
kurtosis and skewness criterion is introduced as follows:
Table 1.Rated Value of the Under Study Test Bench
Kurt Skew
Specifications Value Cks (23)
max( Kurt ) max( Skew)
IM
Rated power 1.5 hp
Rated voltage 220 V
where max(Kurt) and max(Skew) are the maximum
Nominal frequency 50 Hz values of kurtosis and skewness among all scenarios,
No. of poles 4 respectively. At first glance, these results show an
DCM increasing trend in the values of the kurtosis and
Rated power 0.9 kW
Rated voltage 200
skewness from the healthy case to 7% of ITSC fault, in all
Measuring Units of the loading cases, and the cumulative criterion for
Current sensor TA189 every faulty condition is higher than in healthy ones. As
Microcontroller board LAUNCHXL-F28379D shown in Fig. 7, the values of the cumulative criteria for
Short-circuit switch Siemens, 3RH1921-1HA22
Sampling frequency 10 kHz
the healthy cases in every loading percentage, are slightly
lower than those for ITSC fault cases. For a given load
condition, the criterion shows an increasing trend when
fault severity increases. Also, for a given fault level, the
criterion looks sensitive to load conditions with a non-
monotonic variation. Therefore, effective separation of the
healthy and faulty cases necessitates a quantitative
thresholding technique, carried out by the proposed OBT
method.
Table 3. Kurtosis, Skewness and Normalized Cumulative
Criterion for All of the Test Scenarios
Load
(% of ITSCF Cumulative
Kurtosis Skewness
full Severity Criterion
load)
Healthy 14.6021 3.3907 1.2233
No 2% 16.5400 3.6422 1.3441
load 4% 24.3465 4.4045 1.7781
7% 28.4519 4.7747 2
Healthy 14.4306 3.3713 1.2132
2% 16.1847 3.5946 1.3216
12.5%
4% 21.8583 4.1854 1.6448
7% 27.8526 4.7182 1.9671
Healthy 14.5695 3.3906 1.2221
2% 20.5734 4.0080 1.5625
25%
4% 22.5513 4.2560 1.6839 (a)
7% 27.2811 4.6696 1.9368
Healthy 14.4012 3.3618 1.2102
2% 15.8233 3.5515 1.2999
37.5%
4% 22.1543 4.2179 1.6620
7% 26.7034 4.6256 1.9073
Healthy 14.2332 3.3431 1.2004
2% 15.7258 3.5427 1.2946
50%
4% 22.3859 4.2356 1.6738
7% 27.2744 4.6745 1.9376
Healthy 14.5264 3.3856 1.2196
2% 16.3824 3.6211 1.3341
62.5%
4% 23.5988 4.3423 1.7388
7% 26.6655 4.6208 1.9049
Healthy 14.2720 3.3597 1.2052
2% 17.6032 3.7622 1.4066
75% (b)
4% 22.2557 4.2286 1.6678
7% 27.0942 4.6699 1.9303
Healthy 14.5841 3.3937 1.2233
Full 2% 17.3491 3.7344 1.3918
load 4% 23.2045 4.3161 1.7195
7% 27.4196 4.6999 1.9480
Dear Sir,
Credit Authors statement is as follows:
Sincerely,
T. Ghanbari
Declaration of interests