Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Social Psychiatry Principles and Clinical Perspectives 1st Edition Rakesh K Chadda Vinay Kumar Siddharth Sarkar
Social Psychiatry Principles and Clinical Perspectives 1st Edition Rakesh K Chadda Vinay Kumar Siddharth Sarkar
Social Psychiatry Principles and Clinical Perspectives 1st Edition Rakesh K Chadda Vinay Kumar Siddharth Sarkar
https://ebookmeta.com/product/heat-stress-tolerance-in-plants-
physiological-molecular-and-genetic-perspectives-1st-edition-
shabir-h-wani-vinay-kumar/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/medicinal-plants-and-antimicrobial-
therapies-1st-edition-vinay-kumar/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/meta-analysis-in-clinical-research-
principles-and-procedures-anoop-kumar-2/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/meta-analysis-in-clinical-research-
principles-and-procedures-anoop-kumar/
Clinical Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 3rd Edition Vinay
Chandrasekhara
https://ebookmeta.com/product/clinical-gastrointestinal-
endoscopy-3rd-edition-vinay-chandrasekhara/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/nanomaterials-for-environmental-
and-agricultural-sectors-1st-edition-rakesh-kumar-bachheti/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/social-formations-in-the-ancient-
world-from-evolution-of-humans-to-the-greek-civilisation-1st-
edition-rakesh-kumar/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/pharmacokinetics-and-toxicokinetic-
considerations-vol-ii-1st-edition-rakesh-kumar-tekade-editor/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/innovative-development-in-
micromanufacturing-processes-1st-edition-pawan-kumar-rakesh/
SOCIAL PSYCHIATRY
PRINCIPLES AND CLINICAL PERSPECTIVES
Editors
Rakesh K Chadda MD FAMS FRCPsych Vinay Kumar MD
Professor and Head Consultant Psychiatrist
Department of Psychiatry Manoved Mind Hospital and
Chief, National Drug Dependence Research Center
Treatment Center Patna, Bihar, India
All India Institute of Medical Sciences
New Delhi, India
Siddharth Sarkar MD DNB
Assistant Professor
Department of Psychiatry and
National Drug Dependence Treatment Center
All India Institute of Medical Sciences
New Delhi, India
Assistant Editors
Rishi Gupta MD DNB Nishtha Chawla MD DNB
Senior Resident Senior Resident
Department of Psychiatry and Department of Psychiatry and
National Drug Dependence Treatment Center National Drug Dependence Treatment Center
All India Institute of Medical Sciences All India Institute of Medical Sciences
New Delhi, India New Delhi, India
Foreword
NN Wig (Late)
Overseas Offices
J.P. Medical Ltd Jaypee-Highlights Medical Publishers Inc
83 Victoria Street, London City of Knowledge, Bld. 235, 2nd Floor, Clayton
SW1H 0HW (UK) Panama City, Panama
Phone: +44 20 3170 8910 Phone: +1 507-301-0496
Fax: +44 (0)20 3008 6180 Fax: +1 507-301-0499
Email: info@jpmedpub.com Email: cservice@jphmedical.com
Website: www.jaypeebrothers.com
Website: www.jaypeedigital.com
© 2019, Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
The views and opinions expressed in this book are solely those of the original contributor(s)/author(s) and do not
necessarily represent those of editor(s) of the book.
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form or by any
means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission in writing of
the publishers.
All brand names and product names used in this book are trade names, service marks, trademarks or registered
trademarks of their respective owners. The publisher is not associated with any product or vendor mentioned in
this book.
Medical knowledge and practice change constantly. This book is designed to provide accurate, authoritative
information about the subject matter in question. However, readers are advised to check the most current
information available on procedures included and check information from the manufacturer of each product to be
administered, to verify the recommended dose, formula, method and duration of administration, adverse effects
and contraindications. It is the responsibility of the practitioner to take all appropriate safety precautions. Neither
the publisher nor the author(s)/editor(s) assume any liability for any injury and/or damage to persons or property
arising from or related to use of material in this book.
This book is sold on the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in providing professional medical
services. If such advice or services are required, the services of a competent medical professional should be
sought.
Every effort has been made where necessary to contact holders of copyright to obtain permission to reproduce
copyright material. If any have been inadvertently overlooked, the publisher will be pleased to make the necessary
arrangements at the first opportunity. The CD/DVD-ROM (if any) provided in the sealed envelope with this book
is complimentary and free of cost. Not meant of sale.
Inquiries for bulk sales may be solicited at: jaypee@jaypeebrothers.com
It gives us immense pleasure to present to you Social Psychiatry: Principles and Clinical
Perspectives, a landmark book on social psychiatry, published under the aegis of the Indian
Psychiatric Society. This book is first of its kind with comprehensiveness of a textbook, and as
the title goes, covers not only theoretical aspects but also clinical issues including psychosocial
management. It has never been possible to understand and practice psychiatry without taking
sociocultural paradigms into consideration. This has become more important and more
significant in current period due to good and bad effects of globalization related factors like
digitization, urbanization, isolation and migration. This book has been conceptualized well
and highlights the various psycho-social issues pertinent to the developing world in general,
and Indian society and culture in particular. We hope that this publication will be of great help
for all the mental health professionals interested in social psychiatry.
The first and foremost objective of the Indian Psychiatric Society is to promote and advance
the subject of Psychiatry, and we are sure that the publication of Social Psychiatry: Principles
and Clinical Perspectives will further this.
Conceptualizing and editing such a wide range book was a huge task. We appreciate the
commitment and hard work put in by the editors. The Indian Psychiatric Society is grateful to
all the authors from India and abroad for their valuable academic contribution. We express our
sincere thanks to Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers, an internationally acclaimed medical
publisher, for partnering with us, and producing this book so beautifully. We believe that this
book would be a source of pertinent information for both students as well as the practicing
mental health professionals.
Social psychiatry is essence of psychiatric practice, but has often not received due recognition
by the psychiatrists in the background of glamorous biological psychiatry. In the modern day
world with advancing technologies, changing societal norms and intermingling of cultures,
social psychiatry holds even more importance than before. In this background, the book Social
Psychiatry: Principles and Clinical Perspectives fulfills an important scientific need in the field of
psychiatry. The book is a comprehensive compendium of chapters related to social psychiatry.
The range of chapters demonstrates that the book intends to capture the entire breadth of
topics related to social psychiatry. The social psychiatric aspects of various disorders find due
space, and so do the various issues related to social psychiatry. It is enthralling to notice that
several issues which are particularly relevant to the Indian cultural context (like rural mental
health and farmer suicides) find adequate attention in this book.
India has been an active contributor to the social psychiatry movement in the world. I am
pleased to see this book as a yet another important contribution to the cause of social
psychiatry at the global scale. This well-crafted book provides perspectives from the practicing
and academic psychiatrists who cater to a billion plus individuals of the world. With the
contributors being leading experts in the field, including Professors Vijoy K Varma, R Srinivasa
Murthy, Dinesh Bhugra, BN Gangadhar and many others, the volume has the potential of an
important reference source for those in academic centers as well as those in practice. The
readership is intended to be wide and the chapters have been kept at a reasonable level of
technicality. Hence, readers from diverse backgrounds are likely to be benefited from this
book. I expect that this book would find a unique and crucial position in the narrative of social
psychiatry. I would also like to compliment the Indian Psychiatric Society and the Editors of
the book for bringing out this important volume to the readership.
The book Social Psychiatry: Principles and Clinical Perspectives was conceptualized about a
year and half ago by us, Vinay Kumar and Rakesh K Chadda. We had a meeting of a group
of interested colleagues during the XXII World Congress of the World Association of Social
Psychiatry (WASP 2016) at Hotel the Ashok in December 2016 to discuss the initial proposal.
Subsequently the title was finalized. Themes and chapters were finalized over the next 2–3
months. Dr Siddharth Sarkar joined the editorial team in early 2018. We had continued
discussions with colleagues and friends for identifying and finalizing the prospective authors
as well as the publisher. The Indian Psychiatric Society agreed to publish the book under its
banner and Jaypee group was approached and subsequently finalized to publish the book.
Here, we would especially like to acknowledge the inputs from Prof Vijoy K Varma, Prof PK
Singh, Prof Pratap Sharan, and Prof Nitin Gupta in the initial conceptualization of the book.
This book is divided into 5 sections. Section 1 gives a brief introduction to the discipline
of social psychiatry going into its historical development across the world and in India. The
section has also a contribution by Prof Dinesh Bhugra, a Past President of the World Psychiatric
Association and an international authority in social psychiatry.
Section 2 includes conceptual issues on the relationship between mental health and society.
It begins with a chapter on the concept of social psychiatry. It then highlights the family and
social context in relation to the mental health of the individual. A chapter is included describing
biological underpinnings in social psychiatry. Subsequently, social dimensions of behavior
and personality development are discussed, along with the social dimension of spiritual health
and psychiatric epidemiology. Psychology of sub-populations of the society are presented,
and influence of culture, mythology and religion on mental health are delved upon in two
subsequent chapters. The section also presents the social psychiatric aspects of marriage and
similar affiliations. The visible and invisible stressors, which have a bearing on psychiatric
manifestations, are highlighted in a subsequent chapter.
Section 3 covers the social dimensions of psychiatric disorders. The initial chapter in this
section deals with health promotion aspect of evaluating the social well-being and health.
Subsequent chapters discern the social psychiatric aspects of individual disorders, including
schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders, depressive and bipolar disorders, anxiety
disorders, somatoform and dissociative disorders, substance use disorders, psychosexual
disorders, personality disorders, and suicide and similar behaviors. Disorders in special
populations like childhood and adolescent disorders and psychiatric disorders of the elderly
are also covered in this chapter. Physical comorbidity in psychiatry, which is a pertinent
concern in the holistic management of patients, is also discussed in this section.
Section 4 expands upon the social interventions that are relevant to the field of social
psychiatry. Social support and networking is presented first which highlights the dynamic
social networks of the present times. Thereafter, couple therapies, family therapies, and group
therapies are discussed. Subsequently, community models of care are presented followed by
discussion on the rehabilitation of patients with psychiatric illnesses. Preventive psychiatry,
which aims at reducing the incidence and burden of psychiatric disorders is also reviewed
in this section. The section concludes by emphasis on cultural interventions for psychiatric
disorders.
Section 5, the last section, dwells upon the social issues and mental health. The initial
chapter here highlights the stigma of mental illness. Thereafter, migration and mental health
are discussed. This is followed by psychiatry in the armed forces, where the application
of social psychiatry concepts is an interesting reflection. The legislative aspects of mental
health, under which the psychiatry is practiced, is presented next. The social impact of
terrorism and extremism, which is very important in today’s world, is presented thereafter,
followed by discussion on mass media, information technology and mental health. Pertinent
issues of farmer suicides in India, rural mental health and urban mental health are discussed
subsequently. The section concludes with a discussion on globalization, market economy and
mental health.
We hope that the wide range of topics related to the social psychiatry would provide a ready
composite reference for the readers. Clinicians, researchers, academicians and policy makers
are likely to be benefited from this book. The chapters have been contributed by illustrious
experts who are renowned figures in their field. This text is likely to be useful for varied mental
health professionals, including psychiatrists, psychologists, mental health nurses, psychiatric
social workers, and anyone else who is interested in the field of social psychiatry. This
comprehensive compilation would be of interest for both students as well as experts in the
field of mental health. We expect that this book provides information and perspective to the
readers and contributes to the cause of advancement of social psychiatry.
Social psychiatry has a wide range and multiple interfaces. Due to this reason, we needed
experts and academicians not only from the field of psychiatry but also the humanities. We
express our sincere thanks to all the authors for their commitment and hard work. We understand
that thinking differently and writing on unconventional topics is how much difficult. We are
especially grateful to international authors and academic luminaries from humanities for their
contribution. Last but not least, leading medical publisher Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
and its enthusiastic team members deserve all praise for quality production of this book.
Rakesh K Chadda
Vinay Kumar
Siddharth Sarkar
SECTION 1: OVERVIEW
1. History of Social Psychiatry................................................................................................ 3
Vijoy K Varma, Rakesh K Chadda
Genesis of the Specialty 4; Initial Progress in Social Psychiatry 5; Decline in Interest in Social
Psychiatry since 1980s 6; Re-emergence of Social Psychiatry in the 21st Century 7; Social Class,
Inequalities, and Mental Health 8; Role of the World Association of Social Psychiatry 9; Initiatives
to be Taken by Social Psychiatry 10
2. Social Psychiatry and Contemporary Society ................................................................. 14
Antonio Ventriglio, Gurvinder Kalra, Dinesh Bhugra
Social Perspectives 15; Cultures 15; Understanding of Disease and Illness and Social
Factors 16; Therapeutic Interaction 20
3. Social Psychiatry: World Scenario.................................................................................... 23
Roy Abraham Kallivayalil, Varghese P Punnoose
What is Social Psychiatry? 24; Historical Perspectives 24; World Association of Social
Psychiatry 25; Has Social Psychiatry Lived up to Expectations? 26; What Social Psychiatry
has to Offer in a Changing World? 27
4. History of Social Psychiatry in India................................................................................. 29
Rakesh K Chadda
Beginnings of Social Psychiatry in India 30; Community Psychiatry Movement in
India 30; Alternatives to the Conventional Models of Care 31; Contributions of the
General Hospital Psychiatric Units 32; Contributions from the Ancient India 33; Yoga and
Meditation 34; Indian Adaptation of Psychotherapy 35; Contributions by the Indian Association
for Social Psychiatry 36; Social Psychiatry Initiatives at the Level of the State 37; Initiatives from
the Judiciary toward Improvement of Mental Health Care 38
Index.................................................................................................................................................................... 521
1
Overview
SUMMARY
This chapter is an overview of the history of social psychiatry across the world and is divided
into developments in the field in 18th–19th century, genesis of the discipline in early 20th
century, developments following the Second World War, formal recognition of the discipline
around mid-twentieth century, decline following developments in biological psychiatry, and
then re-emergence of social psychiatry. Authors have attempted to cover the global trends,
both in the high income as well as the low and middle-income countries. Recognition of
mental and substance use disorders as a major contributor to the global burden of disease and
failure of biological research to come out with any breakthroughs in treatment have led to a
focus on social psychiatry, which was being ignored in recent past. Social psychiatry appears
to have a bright future in contemporary psychiatry.
INTRODUCTION
Before going into the history of social psychiatry, it is important to discuss the scope of social
psychiatry. In simple words, it could be conceptualized as the subspecialty of psychiatry which
deals with the social aspects of the discipline, i.e., role of social factors in genesis, clinical
presentation, and treatment of mental disorders (Chadda, 2014). The scope can be further
expanded, ranging from the impact of social structures and experiences on onset, course, and
outcome of mental disorders to development of appropriate social interventions and service
delivery. Julian Leff (2010) describes social psychiatry as a discipline, concerned with the
effects of the social environment on the mental health of the individual, and the effects of the
mentally ill person on his/her social environment. Social psychiatry has close linkages with
the community psychiatry and other social sciences like sociology, social psychology, and
social anthropology.
The discipline of social psychiatry has gone through many ups and downs, since the time it
was first recognized over 100 years ago, and its importance is being further reinvented from the
beginning of the twenty-first century due to the inability of the biological psychiatry to come
out with any substantial discoveries after the initial successes.
This chapter is an attempt to trace the history of social psychiatry from beginning to
the current period. Authors do not claim to include every aspect of the history since social
psychiatry is a vast area.
The World Health Organization (WHO) in its definition of health, way back in 1948,
included mental and social wellbeing as integral components of health along with the physical
one. Later, George Engel (Engel, 1980) proposed the biopsychosocial model of disease, which
emphasizes the contributions of biological, psychological and sociological factors in genesis
and management of mental as well as medical illnesses. These developments were indicative
of the recognition of the discipline of social psychiatry in the scientific mind in that period.
The initial historical phase of mental health reforms brought by a number of visionary
psychiatrists in the mental hospitals before the psychopharmacology revolution, which led to a
number of improvements in the condition of the hospitals as well as the inmates, are important
examples of the role of social interventions in mental illness. Recognition of the deleterious
effects of long-term institutionalization on the wellbeing of the inmates, the positive effects
of therapeutic community, and the deinstitutionalization movement are examples of the
continuing existence of social psychiatry in that period of time.
One important development occurred in psychiatry in India around this period, when
Vidya Sagar started involving families in the care of persons with mental illness in tents
outside the premises of the mental hospital at Amritsar. This was the time when families
were considered rather toxic in the Western world and responsible for mental illnesses in
their wards. Vidya Sagar set an example of family therapy to the Western world (Kapur, 2004;
Chadda, 2012). The topic is discussed in more detail in the chapter on the history of social
psychiatry in India. India and other countries in the non-Western world, fortunately, did not
face the problem of deinstitutionalization, since there were never so many mental hospitals
with patients incarcerated in them, and most patients were being looked after by the families
and the community (Chadda, 2001).
In the UK, the Royal College of Psychiatrists set up Social and Community Psychiatry
Group in 1973, just two years after its establishment, confirming the significance social
psychiatry carried. The annual meeting of the College in 1973 included a session on “prospects
of social and community psychiatry.” The Group took over a number of activities including
the development of community psychiatry services, liaison with general practitioners and
promoting educational and scientific interests in social psychiatry. The Group was given the
status of Section by the College in 1981 (Leff, 2010).
WHO had also important contributions to make in the field of social psychiatry in this
period, by its International Pilot Study of Schizophrenia (IPSS) and the study on Determinants
of Outcome of Severe Mental Disorder (DOSMeD). IPSS reported wide differences in course
and outcome of schizophrenia across different countries in the world, with the developing
countries showing better outcome as compared to the developed countries. Role of expressed
emotions in relapse in schizophrenia, and its varied distribution across different cultures, as
found in the DOSMeD study, were major findings from research in the field of social psychiatry
(Leff et al., 1987; Wig et al., 1987; Kulhara et al., 2015).
human brain and genome, and of the etiogenesis of mental disorders, but no novel biological
treatments for psychiatric disorders have come up.
There was a marked decline in funding social psychiatry research received from the 1980s
onwards, and most funding went to the biological research in psychiatry. But despite the fund
crunch, there have been studies during this period proving the effectiveness of psychosocial
treatments for schizophrenia and depression. In fact, family intervention for schizophrenia,
cognitive behavior therapy for schizophrenia, and similarly for depression and anxiety
disorders stands at a strong ground in the contemporary psychiatry (Priebe et al., 2013).
216·7 million), or 7·4% (6·2–8·6) of total disease burden in 2010. Global burden caused by the
mental and substance use disorders was estimated to be more than that caused by HIV/AIDS
and tuberculosis, and diabetes, urogenital, blood, and endocrine diseases, as separate groups.
This finding is of great significance.
Dealing with the burden and disability associated with mental disorders is a huge task,
which needs changes in the mental health policies, strengthening manpower resources, and
targeting barriers to mental health care. The task is especially difficult in the low resource
countries. Psychiatric services are though relatively well developed in the Western world,
the non-Western countries in Asia, Africa, and South America suffer a gross deficiency in
the mental health resources (World Health Organization, 2014). Most of the low and middle-
income countries (LAMIC) have a gross deficiency of mental health manpower. According to
the Mental Health Atlas (2005), the total number of mental health care workers in 58 countries
from the LAMIC group was 362,000, representing 22.3 workers per 100,000 in low income
countries and 26.7 per 100,000 in the middle income countries, comprising 6% psychiatrists,
54% nurses and 41% psychosocial care providers, putting the shortage of mental health workers
at 1.18 million in the 144 LAMIC countries (Kakuma et al., 2011). A number of alternatives
have been suggested to tackle the problem of limited mental health resources especially in the
LAMIC. Key Strategies for meeting the challenges could include transforming health systems
and policy responses, building human resource capacity, improving treatment and expanding
access to care, prevention and implementation of the early interventions, and identifying the
root causes, risks, and protective factors (Collins et al., 2011).
It has often been observed that there is a long delay in seeking treatment for mental
disorders with reasons often being psychosocial in nature. Duration of untreated psychosis has
emerged as an important outcome variable affecting the outcome in psychosis, emphasizing
the need for early detection and beginning of treatment (Penttilä et al., 2014). Factors
leading to delay in seeking treatment include ignorance, myths, and misconceptions about
mental disorders and social stigma, and hence need social interventions. Non-adherence to
treatment and not seeking help for mental disorders are other important factors identified
to be associated with disability and burden associated with mental disorders and needs
active interventions at the hands of social psychiatrists. There has also been a trend towards
increasing suicide rates across some countries, which needs to be studied by the social
psychiatrists. All these issues necessitate the need for a social paradigm in psychiatry, with
social interventions being an important alternative strategy in psychiatric practice. The social
paradigm has often been neglected, though the social interventions could be of great help
in reducing barriers to seeking treatment, improving adherence, facilitating community
rehabilitation and reducing disease-related burden and disability (Chadda, 2016).
between the industrialized and developing world. The developing countries, which comprise
80% of the world’s population, contribute to only 21% of the global gross national product.
The differences in economic and health status within countries have also been found to be as
great as or even greater than those between the rich and poor countries (Pickett & Wilkinson,
2010). Poverty is associated with high levels of common mental health disorders such as
anxiety and depression. Similarly, the underprivileged areas are associated with higher rates
of hospital admissions, outpatient visits and suicide. Poor financial status has been identified
as a predictor of depressive symptoms independent of socioeconomic status, ethnic group and
marital status (Heneghan et al., 1998). The New Haven Study of the 1950s and its follow up
was one of the earliest studies to report a direct relationship between poverty and high rates
of emotional and mental problems. The study had also shown that the different social classes
accessed different types of treatment facilities (Hollingshead & Redlich, 1958; Kim et al., 2017).
Unemployment, another social variable, has been reported to be associated with
increased prevalence of a number of mental disorders including depression, anxiety, phobias,
psychosis and alcohol and substance use disorders (Meltzer et al., 1995). Unemployment
has been identified to be one of the strongest predictors of suicide, even after adjusting
for other socioeconomic variables (Lewis & Sloggett, 1998). Population-based studies
from Netherlands (Bijl et al., 1998) and Ethiopia (Kebede & Alem, 1999) have reported the
association of mood disorders with a range of social factors like unemployment, education,
and under-achievement. Differences in educational attainment have also been identified
as important factors contributing to social inequalities in psychiatric disorder in the world
(Patel & Kleinman, 2003). A study from Brazil has shown an independent association of
poor educational attainment and low income with increased prevalence of common mental
disorders (Ludermir & Lewis, 2001). Thus, a range of social factors like education, income and
occupational status which contribute to the socioeconomic status and also social inequalities
independently as well as together can act as risk factors for mental illness.
The WASP (earlier under the umbrella of International Association of Social Psychiatry)
has the distinction of propagating the cause of social psychiatry across the world by holding
regular world congresses every 3 years in different countries across the world. A distinction
lies in having its congresses both in the developed as well as the underdeveloped world. India
has the unique distinction of organizing the WASP congresses thrice in 1992, 2001 and 2016.
WASP has the objectives of studying the nature of man, the culture, prevention and
treatment of man’s vicissitudes and behavioral disorders, promoting national and international
collaborations among professionals and societies in fields related to social psychiatry, making
the knowledge and practice of social psychiatry available to other sciences and to the public,
and advancing the physical, social and philosophic wellbeing of the mankind (Craig, 2016).
WASP has a number of special sections and task forces, some of which focus on the promotion
of personal recovery, family support, and intervention, fighting stigma and migration. Thus,
the WASP has played an important role in propagating the cause of the social psychiatry.
It is important to mention here that the role of social factors can’t be ignored in mental
health despite all the biological advances. Biology can never replace the social factors. Since
the psychiatrist works in a social situation and communication is an important part of the
psychiatric assessment and psychiatric illnesses mostly manifest in interpersonal situations,
social psychiatry will always remain an integral part of psychiatry. The psychiatrist needs to be
familiar with various psychosocial risk and protective factors so as to take appropriate steps at
mental health promotion and prevention.
A number of recommendations of the World Health Report of 2001, which was devoted to
mental health, include social approaches such as providing treatment of mental disorders in
primary care, bringing the services at doorsteps, mental health education to the community,
involving consumers, families and the community in mental health care, developing human
resources, developing linkages with other sectors like education, labor, social welfare, and
monitoring community mental health services (World Health Organization, 2001).
CONCLUSION
Social psychiatry is an integral part of psychiatry since mental disorders manifest in
interpersonal and social context, and hence for understanding and managing mental disorders,
it is not possible to ignore it. The discipline may not be as popular as biological psychiatry due
to the glamour attached to the latter but has existed all the time. There have been ups and
downs in the importance social psychiatry has received by the psychiatrist and other mental
health professionals over the period. Mental health reforms in the mental hospitals are one of
the earliest examples of social interventions. Deinstitutionalization, therapeutic community,
the concept of day hospital, psychosocial rehabilitation and other psychosocial methods of
interventions are some important examples of social psychiatry initiatives in the twentieth
century. The relevance of social psychiatry re-emerged in the last 2 decades especially on
recognition of mental disorders as a major contributor to the global burden of disease and
disease-related disability and absence of any major successes in biological psychiatry after
initial hopes.
REFERENCES
Bhugra D, Till A. Public mental health is about social psychiatry. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2013;59(2):105-6.
Bijl RV, Ravelli A, Van Zessen G. Prevalence of psychiatric disorder in the general population: results of
the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study (NEMESIS). Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr
Epidemiol. 1998; 33(12):587-95.
Brown GW, Bifulco A, Harris TO. Life events, vulnerability and onset of depression: some refinements. Br
J Psychiatry. 1987;150(J):30-42.
Chadda RK. Psychiatric patient in the community: challenges and solutions. J Ment Health Behav.
2001;6:7-15.
Chadda RK. Six decades of community psychiatry in India Int Psychiatry. 2012;9:45-7.
Chadda RK. What social psychiatry has to offer in contemporary psychiatric practice? Ind J Soc Psychi-
atry. 2014;30:7-13.
Chadda RK. Global burden of mental disorders: meeting the challenge. Ann Nat Acad Med Sci (India).
2016;52:39-55.
Coip R. History of psychiatry. In: Sadock B, Sadock V, Ruiz P (Eds). Comprehensive Textbook of Psychi-
atry, 9th edition. Philedelphia: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott/Williams & Wilkins; 2009. Pp. 4474-509.
Collins PY, Patel V, Joestl SS, et al. Grand challenges in global mental health. Nature 2011;472:27-30.
Craig TK. World Association of Social Psychiatry: a brief history (1963-2016). In: Souvenir of the XXII
World Congress of Social Psychiatry, New Delhi. 2016.
Engel GL. The clinical application of the biopsychosocial model. Am J Psychiatry. 1980;137(5):535-44.
Haack K, Kumbier E. History of social psychiatry. Curr Opin Psychiatr. 2012;25(6):492-6.
Heneghan AM, Silver EJ, Bauman LJ, et al. Depressive symptoms in inner-city mothers of young children:
who is at risk? Pediatrics. 1998;102(6):1394-400.
Hollingshead AB, Redlich FC. Social class and mental illness: a community study. New York: John Wiley;
1958.
Kakuma R, Minas H, Ginneken N Van, et al. Human resources for mental health care: current situation
and strategies for action. Lancet. 2011;378(9803):1654-63.
Kapur R. The story of community mental health in india. In: Agarwal S, Goel D, Salhan R, Ichhpujani
R, Shrivastava S (Eds). Mental health: An Indian perspective (1946–2003). New Delhi: Directorate
General of Health Services, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India/Elsevier;
2004. Pp. 92-100.
Kebede D, Alem A. Major mental disorders in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. I. Schizophrenia, schizoaffective
and cognitive disorders. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 1999;397:11-7.
Kim HS, Hollingshead S, Wohl MJA. Who spends money to play for free? identifying who makes
micro-transactions on social casino games (and why). J Gambling Studies. 2017;33(2):525-38.
Kulhara P, Grover S, Kate N. Schizophrenia: Indian research I. Epidemiology, clinical features, neurobi-
ology and psychosocial aspects. In: Malhotra S, Chakrabarti S (Eds). Developments in Psychiatry
in India. New Delhi: Springer (India); 2015. Pp. 139-72.
Leff J. The historical development of social psychiatry. In: Morgan C, Bhugra D (Eds). Principles of Social
Psychiatry. London: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. Pp. 3-11.
Leff J, Wig NN, Ghosh A, et al. Expressed emotion and schizophrenia in North India. III. Influence of
relatives’ expressed emotion on the course of schizophrenia in Chandigarh. Br J Psychiatry.
1987;151:166-73.
Leighton DC, Harding JS, Macklin DB, et al. Psychiatric findings of the Srirling County study. Am J Psychi-
atry. 1963;119:1021-6.
Lewis G, Sloggett A. Suicide, deprivation, and unemployment: record linkage study. BMJ (Clinical
Research Ed.). 1998;317(7168):1283-6.
Ludermir AB, Lewis G. Links between social class and common mental disorders in northeast Brazil. Soc
Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2001;36(3):101-7.
Meltzer H, Gill B, Petticrew M, et al. OPCS surveys of psychiatric morbidity in Great Britain London:
HMSO; 1995.
Murali V, Oyebode F. Poverty, social inequality and mental health. Adv Psychiatr Treat. 2004;10(3):216-24.
Murray CJL, Lopez AD. The global burden of disease: a comprehensive assessment of mortality and
disability from diseases, injuries, and risk factors in 1990 and projected to 2020. Cambridge, MA:
Harvard School of Public Health on Behalf of the World Health Organization and the World Bank;
1996.
Murray CJL, Vos T, Lozano R, et al. Disability-adjusted life years DALYs for 291 diseases and injuries in
21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet.
2012;(380):2197-223.
Patel V, Kleinman A. Poverty and common mental disorders in developing countries. Bull World Health
Organ. 2003;81(8):609-15.
Penttilä M, Jääskeläinen E, Hirvonen N, et al. Duration of untreated psychosis as predictor of long-term
outcome in schizophrenia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2014;205(2):
88-94.
Pickett KE, Wilkinson RG. Inequality: an underacknowledged source of mental illness and distress. Br J
Psychiatry. 2010;197(6):426-8.
Priebe S, Tom B, Craig TKJ. The future of academic psychiatry may be social. Br J Psychiatry.
2013;202(5):319-20.
Saraga M, Stiefel F. Psychiatry and the scientific fallacy. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2011;124(1):70-2.
Srole L, Langner T, Michael S, et al. Mental health in the metropolis: the midtown manhatten study. New
York: McGraw-Hill; 1962.
Wig NN, Menon DK, Bedi H, et al. Expressed emotion and schizophrenia in north India I. Cross-cultural
transfer of ratings of relatives’ expressed emotion. Br J Psychiatry. 1987;151:156-73.
World Health Organization. Mental health: new understandings, new hope. Geneva: World Health
Organization; 2001.
World Health Organization. Mental health atlas 2014. Geneva: Department of Mental Health and
Substance Abuse/World Health Organization; 2014.
SUMMARY
Social factors form the basis of many psychiatric disorders in that they can not only cause
mental illness and distress but can also lead to perpetuation and help seeking. Social psychiatry
is that branch of psychiatry which deals with the effects of social environment on the mental
health of the individual. It is important to understand that human beings are social animals.
Interactions with others lie at the heart of social living and in understanding of psychiatry
and its responsibilities in particular. Families are an inherent part of social functioning and
these familial and social reactions can lead to difficulties in human functioning both directly
and indirectly. It is well recognized that social and environmental factors do influence the
presentation and precipitation of psychiatric disorders. Social factors do affect cognitions,
behaviors and mood which form the basis of psychiatric disorders. Of course, biological and
genetic factors influence psychiatric disorders but in turn these are also affected by social
determinants.
INTRODUCTION
Social factors can influence the causation, perpetuation, and responses to stress and
psychiatry. Social psychiatry deals with the effects that social environment can have on
the mental health of the individual. It must be recognized that basically, human beings are
social animals. Interactions with others lie at the heart of social living. Consequently, these
familial and social relationships can cause difficulties in human functioning both directly and
indirectly. It is inevitable that social and environmental factors will contribute to psychiatric
disorders. There may be major problems in our understanding of psychiatric disorders,
especially when these are related to diagnoses. One standard way of looking at mental illness
is how these abnormalities influence thoughts, actions, and behaviors which constitute types
of psychiatric disorders. These are strongly affected by biological and genetic factors. Genetic
vulnerability to many psychiatric disorders can lead to abnormal or pathological responses to
stress and other social determinants such as unemployment, poverty, overcrowding, lack of
green spaces, urbanization, and industrialization, in addition to others. Social determinants
thus can contribute to psychiatric disorders. There are social class differences in both
understanding and explanations of psychiatric disorders which not surprisingly influence
pathways into care. The Society also affects pathways as it is the policymakers who on behalf
of the society determine what resources are to be provided for healthcare. It is clear that the
field of social medicine includes social and cultural aspects and perspectives of health and
medicine and determinants. In spite of the breaking of the genetic code, social determinants
continue to play a major role in the genesis and perpetuation of medical disorders. Even the
genetic code is under the influence of social and external environmental factors. The roots of
disease are still social. All of the diseases, whether it is infectious, genetic, metabolic, traumatic,
malignant or degenerative, has social components in the larger perspective or a narrower one.
SOCIAL PERSPECTIVES
McHugh and Slavney offer four different perspectives to psychiatry equally applicable to other
branches of medicine (McHugh & Slavney, 1998). These four standard methods for explaining
mental disorders implicit in current psychiatric clinical practice include disease, dimensional,
behavioral and life story perspectives. These authors argue that the disease perspective is
focused on the clinical entity, pathological condition, and etiology whereas a dimensional
perspective is applicable to the logic of quantitative gradation and individual variation. Such a
perspective relies on normal variation which can be based on attributes such as intelligence or
personality trait thus relying on not only a range but also a quantitative spectrum. Therein lies
the abnormality which can be identified. Behavioral perspective focuses on goal-directed and
goal-driven features of human life and identifies abnormalities in some features such as sexual
functioning, eating disorders, etc. Life story perspectives rely on disturbing experiences such
as loss leading to grief as well as the developmental aspects of the individual. Psychiatry thus
carries within the discipline a social perspective; the notion of cultural and social roles which
may be affected and indeed related to social stratification and social class which may be linked
to social structures, socio-economic realities and last but not the least socio-political realities.
CULTURES
Hofstede (2001) defines various aspects of cultures which include socio-centric or ego-centric
aspects (also described as collectivist and individualist factors respectively); masculine and
feminine; how distant individuals in a particular culture feel from the center of power; how
cultures avoid uncertainty; and what the long-term orientation of the culture is (Hofstede,
2001). The latter three aspects may well apply better to the cultures of big organizations as
that’s where Hofstede had carried out his work. The type of society whether it is ego-centric or
socio-centric may work at bigger level but does not mean that every individual in that culture
will either be same as the larger society. Ego-centricity or individualism refers to society where
the ties between individuals are loose, and everyone is expected to look after himself/herself
and their immediate or nuclear family whereas socio-centrism or collectivism means that
people from birth onwards are integrated into strong cohesive in- groups which throughout
their lifetime continue to protect them in exchange for unquestioning loyalty. Whereas
individualism represents I-ness, I-consciousness, autonomy, emotional independence,
individual initiative, right to privacy, pleasure-seeking, financial security, and need for
specific friendship, collectivism represents we-ness, we-consciousness, collective identity,
emotional interdependence, group solidarity, sharing duties and obligations, need for stable
and predetermined friendships and group decisions (Hofstede, 1980, 1984). The individual
identity in ego-centric individuals is about one-self whereas the identity in socio-centric
societies and individuals is based on kinship and “tribal” loyalty. Ego-centric individuals are
often seen as rational individuals with personal choices who are discreet, autonomous, self-
sufficient and respectful of the rights of others. Hofstede (2001) sees them as their role confined
by achievement and they believe in equality, equity, non-interference, and detachability.
Individuals in socio-centric characteristics are bound by the common good, and social
harmony and others are put first before themselves. They see justice and institutions as an
extension of the family and follow paternalism and legal moralism. Socio-centric individuals
share material as well as non-material resources; they appear to be more susceptible to social
influences and self-presentation and face-work; sharing of outcomes, and; feeling involved in
others’ lives. Ego-centric societies have been shown to be having higher rates of crime, suicide,
divorce, child abuse, emotional stress and physical and mental illness and higher levels of
Gross National Product. It is entirely possible that egocentric individuals in individualistic
cultures will disregard the needs of communities, families or workgroups, and socio-centric
individuals will feel concerned about their communities and in- groups. Egocentric individuals
in collectivist societies are also more likely to yield to group norms less than socio-centric
persons in individualistic cultures whereas people from individualistic cultures are good
at entering and leaving new social groups thereby making migration easy and also settling
down after such an event. Ego-centric individuals have great skills in forming new in-groups
and superficially appear more sociable. Thus it makes sense that egocentric individuals from
collectivist societies will settle down better in individualistic societies and on the other hand,
socio-centric individuals from collectivist societies, if socially isolated or alienated, will have
difficulty in setting down in individualistic societies. Similarly, masculine societies (mostly
Latin American societies) allow men to dominate. Feminine societies such as Scandinavian
countries believe in gender equality, and child-rearing is a shared activity. Thus different
societal and cultural attitudes will influence the social and cognitive development of the child.
experiences and culture of the medicine itself which is affected by health care and health
systems and social determinants of disease need to be brought together. All of these are social.
As society changes as a result of globalization and urbanization, social factors change, and
their emergence can lead to the development of new forms of stress and distress. For example,
increasing use of social media such as Twitter, Instagram, etc. has led to increased stress, but
we are nowhere near full understanding of the issues related to this and individual users’
mental state.
Background: Psychiatry has always been a specialty of medicine, and to the end of the 19th
century the term alienism was used to explain the specialty. There is little doubt that society
through its political, religious and community leaders (who may all be self-selected) defines
and identifies deviance which may be based on statistical variation only. As types of treatments
were very limited, patients with psychiatric illness (defined and identified as aliens) were
often confined to asylums-institutions which were meant to keep people with mental illness
generally hidden away from public eye. This also meant that paradoxically this contributed to
stigma and affected further resourcing of services. Although there were some very high profiled
psychiatrists and clinicians who were politically and socially well-tuned and tried to change the
delivery of services, the purpose of treatment was often punitive in order to make them behave
in a way which was seen as being acceptable to the society they were serving. Although there
has quite rightly been an emphasis on treatment, inevitably control and seclusion became the
norm. Attempts to understand the causation of mental illness had been largely social initially,
and as the knowledge of biology and anatomy and human physiology increased, genetic and
biological aspects came into their own. Furthermore, a better understanding of psyche perhaps
influenced by psychoanalysis contributed to the development of a biopsychosocial model of
etiology as well as management. However, often clinician struggle to ascertain which of the
three components is of larger importance. Spirituality in many countries and cultures as in
India can play a further role in contributing to both stress and alleviation of symptoms. Often
the emphasis has been on biological and psychological etiological management only, but not
on social consequences of the illness (Ventriglio & Bhugra, 2015). All psychiatry is social as it is
based on a number of reasons as discussed below.
First and foremost, human beings are born into cultures and not with cultures. Culture
and social milieu play a major role in shaping individual’s world-view and cognitive and social
development. That is where we all learn to communicate and manage social interactions
which go on to define human living. The brain, with its structures and functions, is affected
by social factors and causes certain ways of functioning or dysfunction. There is increasing
evidence that social determinants of health play a major role in the genesis of both physical
and mental illness (Marmot, 2005, 2014). These social determinants include urban factors like
poverty, unemployment, overcrowding and a lack of green spaces, among others. The clinical
practice of psychiatry (as well as of medicine) is in the social context where society determines
the funding, structures, policies, and environment within which clinical and therapeutic
encounters take place.
Health should not be seen as a simple absence of disease (Constitution of the World Health
Organization, 2006) as has been defined by the WHO (Huber et al., 2011). With increased
longevity and people living with complex co-morbidities and also having episodes of health
and wellbeing after managing periods of illness such as bipolar illness, it becomes difficult
to marry concepts of disease and illness. Therefore, the social domain of illness is about
one’s ability to manage one’s life and social functioning which allows the individuals to lead
fulfilling lives and meet their potential and obligations with a degree of independence. Health,
therefore, becomes a dynamic balance between opportunities and limitations both of which
are strongly influenced by social and environmental conditions. Thus social domain takes on
a major role in our understanding of mental health and the practice of clinical psychiatry. We
believe that social domain is much more pertinent and can be seen as a crucial aetiological
factor too as demonstrated by Brown and Harris’s seminal work (Brown & Harris, 1978) on
life events and depression. It may be that more organic conditions such as dementia have
more clearly identifiable biological substrate, but even their onset can be influenced by social
factors, loneliness and lack of support.
Bhugra et al. (2012) describe the psychiatry’s contract with society as an implicit agreement
as to what is expected of psychiatrists by the society and in return what psychiatrists expect
from society (Bhugra et al., 2012). Thus, psychiatrists suggest that they need appropriate
resources; an absence of stigma; managing both public mental health and clinical services.
There is no doubt that psychiatry must be allowed to get their views across to a wide range
of audiences and fight for the good mental health of both the population and service users;
as well as educating all stakeholders. As part of their contract, psychiatrists need to explain
better what it does, and the judgments psychiatrists make in applying its practices, such as the
use of compulsion and psychiatric medication. On the other side, the society needs to ensure
adequate resources for services, change policies related to social inequalities and social
disparities. Both sides need to be open and honest in their interactions with each other and
focus on developing good relationships and communication. Interestingly often this contract
is within the medical framework. It is acknowledged that any relationship between psychiatry,
society, and management of mental illness has always been complex and mutually ambivalent.
As mentioned, the contract often ignores what exactly the role of the psychiatrist is, and how
public mental health is often side-lined with a simple acknowledgment or ignored completely.
As discussed above, there is a disparity between the patient and the psychiatrist as the former
are more interested in illness whereas the latter are interested in disease (Eisenberg, 1977).
Under these circumstances, the focus on managing psychiatrically ill patients is narrowed
further to medication only to make them comply. In addition in countries such as India where
human resources are not adequate, poly-pharmacy in the context of time-limited consultations
contribute further complexity to therapeutic interactions. Inevitably this leads to the role of
social conditions causing psychiatric disorders being ignored, and advocacy for patients is not
as strong and vocal as it could/should be. Virchow (1986) maintained that illness (of any kind)
was an indictment of the political system and that politics was nothing other than medicine on
a large scale (Virchow, 1986). The idea that medicine is social is not new or even recent , but it
keeps being ignored when it is argued by influential people that changes in brain structure are
needed to demonstrate the existence of a psychiatric diagnosis (Insel & Lieberman, 2013). At
the other extreme is the serious danger of medicalizing normal human emotions such as grief
into pathological grief, shyness into social phobia, etc.
In many parts of the world at the undergraduate level, preventive and social medicine forms
a major part of training. However, within such curriculum, there is quite rightly a major focus
on infectious diseases and occupational health, and often no emphasis is placed whatsoever on
mental health aspects of infections or employment. The social medicine model is much more
applicable to psychiatry, as such an approach leads to a clearer understanding of what is seen
as behaviorally normal and what is construed as deviant. Psychiatrists as managers of society’s
concerns and expectations can lead to more re-training options (Ventriglio & Bhugra, 2015).
As mentioned above, the life story perspective described by McHugh and Slavney (1998)
provides an unusual way of looking at mental disorders. Life story perspective aims to provide
a framework for developmental aspects of the individual as well as getting a perspective
based on narrative. The development of individuals does not stop in adolescence or youth,
and this is a view which needs further exploration and understanding. It is apparent that such
a perspective will carry with it social and cultural values and domains. As Eisenberg (1977)
states it is the patients who determine not only the importance of the distress and when and
where to seek help from, they also determine what the status of their social functioning is,
wherein the broader framework of this functioning is set by society at large. This is one way of
social control of what is perceived as social deviance which is clearly defined by the society.
Many previously commonly diagnosed disorders such as catatonia, hebephrenia, hysteria or
conversion disorders have disappeared in the West, at least over the past few decades whereas
conditions such as internet addiction and hikikomori have emerged. It may reflect changes in
psychiatric conditions in response to changes in societies. For example, conversion disorders
are rarely seen among white British people in comparison with Indian patients. Whether this
means that these disorders are genuinely more common or whether these have transmogrified
into something else is important to ascertain. Another example will be introjection of distress
by men and using alcohol to deal with it whereas women may use self-harm as a strategy to
deal with stress. Similarly, the rise of post-traumatic stress disorder in many countries begs
the question whether symptoms have altered in response to social expectations and the role
individuals are expected to play in the social system.
Porter pointed out that the 19th-century social reformers in the West were keen to increase
the political role of medicine which may have led to introducing this to the undergraduate
training of medical students (Porter, 2002, 2006). An additional factor has been a gradual shift
from social behavior to lifestyle medicine in the last century as countries have progressed and
in many cultures-in-transition such as India. Stonington and Holmes (2006) point out that the
way healthcare systems and healthcare models are funded and designed is affected by the social
systems (Stonington & Holmes, 2006). Social medicine includes social and cultural studies of
health and medicine and social determinants of health and illness (Holtz et al., 2006). These
frameworks play a major role in mental healthcare systems. Variations in rates of psychiatric
disorders across countries and societies and even within the same society according to gender,
race, and ethnicity, social and economic status are recognized. Psychiatry at this stage of its
history stands at a similar turning point as medicine did 150 years ago in that our understanding
of mental illness is getting better with more understanding about structures and functions of
brain and psychopharmacogenomics. It has been shown that attachment patterns in childhood
influence brain structures which will, in turn, affect brain functioning and this confirms the
notion that social factors are important. Malekpour pointed out that infants upon birth are far
more competent, social, responsive and more able to make sense of their environments than
previously imagined (Malekpour, 2007). The social interaction starts to build individual identity
(Fraiberg, 1959) and attachment patterns modify underlying brain structures. Schore goes on
to observe that right brain maturation in its regulatory capacities is experience-dependent and
points out that secure attachments in childhood lead to the development of efficient right brain
regulatory functions and good infant mental health (Schore, 1994). Perhaps cross-cultural
studies looking at child-rearing patterns and linking these with structural brain changes may
help understand further the link between the society, social factors, and human functioning.
There have been recent suggestions that genetic mutations themselves may be influenced by
stressors to push individuals into psychiatric disorders. This has been described as the two hit
theory (Maric & Svrakic, 2012). These authors postulate that genetic defects by themselves and
per se may not lead to illness but under the influence of other factors may create the second hit
leading to expression of pathological mutation. Epigenetics is a relatively new field which deals
with our understanding of how environmental influences modulate gene activity.
Stress vulnerability response psychosis models have existed for quite some time, but
epigenetics focuses on vulnerability at micro-levels. Kirkbride et al, (2012) postulated that
maternal pre-natal nutrition could influence the risk of schizophrenia in the offspring
following epigenetic effects (Kirkbride et al., 2012). These factors related perhaps to infections,
malnutrition and other dietary factors may well play a role in explaining some of the variations
in rates of schizophrenia.
We welcome that DSM-5 (American Psychiatric Association, 2013) has included cultural
factors and cultural formulation, but we recommend that socio-cultural dimensions of
individual experiences and distress are incorporated in the diagnostic and management
frameworks in a clearer way than they have been so far. Patient narratives, life history, and
developmental perspective allow us to explore social factors in the context of etiology and
biological vulnerabilities on the one hand and their influence on therapeutic engagement
and outcomes on the other.
THERAPEUTIC INTERACTION
The practice of psychiatry is much more strongly related to social milieu perhaps more so than
many medical specialties. Social environment and social determinants, therefore, need to be
applied more rigorously to psychiatric diagnostic framework and management capabilities.
The key components of therapeutic encounter in psychiatry belong to the patient and doctor
interaction which is strongly influenced by patient perspectives and expectations. Patients’ and
carers’ beliefs, explanatory models, past experiences, the culture of the healthcare system and
the profession itself within which psychiatry is practiced are some of the key aspects of patient
engagement. Patients’ understanding of their own distress and explanatory models which
make sense to them (Kleinman, 1980) are part of the social model, and clinicians’ emphasis
on biological models needs to shift somewhat towards social causation, precipitation, and
perpetuation of psychiatric distress. Bhugra (2014) reflects that social causation of psychiatric
illness and their role in management must take higher priority than before (Bhugra, 2014). As
Ventriglio and Bhugra (2015) highlight that in psychiatric practice, although lip service is paid
to social factors, often these are excluded on the basis that biological factors make psychiatry
1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also
govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most
countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside the
United States, check the laws of your country in addition to the terms
of this agreement before downloading, copying, displaying,
performing, distributing or creating derivative works based on this
work or any other Project Gutenberg™ work. The Foundation makes
no representations concerning the copyright status of any work in
any country other than the United States.
• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the
method you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The
fee is owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark,
but he has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to
the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty
payments must be paid within 60 days following each date on
which you prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your
periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked
as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information
about donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation.”
• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.
1.F.
1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth in
paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’, WITH NO
OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation
methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of
other ways including checks, online payments and credit card
donations. To donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate.
Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
facility: www.gutenberg.org.