Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Strategies For Employee Assistance Programs The Crucial Balance Second Edition, Revised Edition William J. Sonnenstuhl
Strategies For Employee Assistance Programs The Crucial Balance Second Edition, Revised Edition William J. Sonnenstuhl
https://ebookmeta.com/product/the-employee-performance-handbook-
smart-strategies-for-coaching-employees-3rd-edition-margie-mader-
clark/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/reading-difficulties-and-dyslexia-
essential-concepts-and-programs-for-improvement-second-edition-
updated-edition-das-j-p/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/reading-difficulties-and-dyslexia-
essential-concepts-and-programs-for-improvement-second-edition-
updated-edition-j-p-das/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/the-work-life-balance-myth-1st-
edition-david-j-mcneff/
The Case Study Handbook, Revised Edition: A Student's
Guide William Ellet
https://ebookmeta.com/product/the-case-study-handbook-revised-
edition-a-students-guide-william-ellet/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/crucial-conversations-tools-for-
talking-when-stakes-are-high-second-edition-kerry-patterson-
joseph-grenny-ron-mcmillan-al-switzler/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/beyond-access-indigenizing-
programs-for-native-american-student-success-1st-edition-
stephanie-j-waterman/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/nutritional-health-strategies-for-
disease-prevention-norman-j-temple/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/applied-biostatistics-for-the-
health-sciences-second-edition-richard-j-rossi/
Key Issues Number 30
ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS:
William J. Sonnenstuhl
Harrison M. Trice
ILR Press
School of Industrial and Labor Relations
Cornell University
Copyright © 1986,1990 by Cornell University
ISSN: 0070-0185
ISBN: 0-87546-167-0
Second printing, 1995
PREFACE v
Program Policy 11
EAP Sensitivity to Alcoholism 13
The Core Technology of EAPs 14
Top-Management Support 15
Program Management and Coordination 16
Supervisory Training 18
Peer Training 19
Employee Education 20
The Counseling Component 21
In-House Services 22
External Services 23
Community Resource Network 23
Union Support and Involvement 24
Summary 26
Program Evaluation 55
Some Neglected Aspects of Program Evaluation 60
Future Studies 62
Integrating Research into Practice 63
The Crucial Balance: A Summary 63
EAP Strategies: Constructive Confrontation and Counseling 64
Program Adoption 64
Labor-Management Cooperation 64
References 69
PREFACE
In the first edition, we attempted to make sense of the conflicting notions of
"employee assistance11 by reviewing the historical origins of employee assistance
programs (EAPs) and by building on the empirical research about program
effectiveness. We concluded that effective programs maintain a crucial balance
between constructive confrontations—the workplace strategy for identifying and
motivating alcoholic and other troubled employees to change their behavior—and
the dynamics of counseling because these strategies act synergetically. Today,
there is an emerging consensus that maintaining this crucial balance is at the core of
EAP work (Blum, Roman, and Tootle, 1988; Roman, 1988).
According to Roman and Blum (1985, 1988b) the core tasks involved in
maintaining this balance are:
1. consulting with and training supervisors, managers, stewards, and coworkers
on the use of: job performance to identify employees' behavioral problems and
constructive confrontation to motivate them to resolve their behavioral problems;
2. linking alcoholic and other troubled employees to community resources for
counseling and treatment;
3. creating and maintaining links between the work organization and community
resources; and
4. maintaining a program emphasis on alcohol and other substance abuse
problems.
Consensus is slowly emerging among employee assistance workers as they
attempt to become more professional and cut out a protected labor market for
themselves (Blum, 1988). Currently, they are organized into two occupational
associations: the Employee Assistance Professional Association (EAPA) and the
Employee Assistance Society of North America (EASNA). Originally founded in
1971, EAPA was known as the Association of Labor-Management Administrators
and Consultants on Alcoholism (ALMACA). The association changed its name in
1989 to highlight members' identity as employee assistance rather than alcoholism
workers and to reflect their belief that they are entitled to professional status.
EASNA was formed by discontented ALMACA members who felt that it was
moving too slowly toward development of professional standards.
Generally, EAPA and EASNA agree that the core tasks listed above are the
basis of employee assistance work; however, they disagree about what
qualifications someone should possess to do such work and what qualities a
program should possess to be accredited as an employee assistance program.
EAPA has developed its certification process for workers around a single standard
that assesses knowledge of the core tasks (ALMACAN, 1989). EASNA sees this
standard as too narrow and argues for developing separate standards for each of
the roles played by workers: marketing, administration, and counseling.
Currently, EASNA is proposing standards for program accreditation that do not
mention EAPA certification but do describe different standards for workers who
perform different EAP roles and require all staff to have "EASNA-approved
training" (EASNA, 1989a, 1989b). EAPA, on the other hand, rejects program
accreditation by an outside agency and is developing a set of guidelines with which
it expects EAPs to comply voluntarily.
v
Workers cannot simply appropriate professional status for themselves by
enacting the ritual symbols of professionalism; rather, society must also recognize
their exclusive right to perform the tasks they claim as their own. By this standard,
employee assistance workers have fared poorly. As yet, no college offers an EAP
curriculum based exclusively on the core tasks which leads to a professional degree;
rather, a small number of schools offer either a limited undergraduate curriculum
(e.g., Trice, 1990; Quick, Sonnenstuhl, and Trice, 1987) or incorporate an
EAP-specific course or two into such human service-oriented graduate programs as
social work, alcohol counseling, and psychology (NIDA, 1988). Without a
graduate curriculum to call its own, society will not recognize EAP work as a
profession.
Likewise, no state is considering licensing employee assistance workers—the
ultimate symbol of professionalism. Some states have written voluntary guidelines
reflective of the core tasks but they have not generally restricted the use of the term
employee assistance to either personnel or programs that comply with those
standards (e.g., NYSDAAA, 1990). For instance, California's Knox-Keene
legislation, which was inspired by insurance industry complaints that EAPs are a
form of prepaid health insurance and ought to be regulated like psychological
health maintenance organizations, does not restrict the use of the term employee
assistance to those programs that simply perform the core tasks: identification and
referral (Cagney, 1989). Rather, it merely exempts the small EAP that does not
provide psychological treatment from being licensed by the Department of
Corporations like psychological health maintenance organizations, while allowing
any organization to call itself an EAP. As one small independent employee
assistance worker aptly explains, "My motivation was to protect my. . . business
rather than protect any 'proprietary* claim on the 'concept of EAP'" (Collins,
1988:20).
Conflict between professsionals and organizational managers occurs because
professionals, claiming autonomy, reject administrative demands that they perform
tasks outside of their claimed area of expertise. In contrast, employee assistance
workers appear unable to confine their work to the core tasks and appear
particularly willing to take on new assignments. For instance, managers have been
able to make employee assistance workers comply with their requests to bypass
constructive confrontation in favor of rushing employees into treatment (Trice and
Beyer, 1984a). Likewise, in recent years, as pressures have increased for
companies to cut health care costs and implement drug testing, EAPs seemingly
have taken on these new chores with little resistance. Indeed, many EAP workers
have seen these challenges as opportunities for increasing their domains.
Finally, if employee assistance work is ever to achieve professional status,
EAPA must do more than adopt the ceremonial trappings of a code of ethics
(ALMACAN, 1988a, 1988b); it must also enforce them. Paul M. Roman
(1990:10) puts the matter succinctly:
Rumors abound regarding ethical issues. . . .Despite the
juiciness of these stories, no one seems to want to take the next
steps of determining facts which can be weighed by a respected
tribunal, followed by disciplinary sanctions if appropriate If
the field allows unethical behavior to fester and grow, these
vi
diffuse to those whose respect is essential. . . .Active
recognition that ethics are taken seriously is the means by
which constituencies have "faith" in the behavior of those in the
established professions.
Despite any emerging consensus about the core tasks, then, it is impossible to
assert that employee assistance work is a profession or will ever become one.
Indeed, employee assistance may remain what it has been all along—a loosely
connected group of people who believe in helping their fellow workers and have
discovered in the crucial balance a simple, inexpensive, and effective means of
doing so. Consequently, throughout this edition, we once again focus on the
crucial balance between the workplace and treatment place, emphasizing the
important roles that managers, supervisors, stewards, and coworkers play in
identifying and motivating alcoholic and other troubled employees to change their
behavior. Today, this seems particularly important because, despite verbal
agreement with the core tasks, too many employee assistance workers appear to
have lost sight of the critical and beneficial functions their actions play in
rehabilitation, emphasizing instead the role of counselors in treatment. This
discussion is designed not only for executives and labor leaders but also for EAP
coordinators and directors as well as for managers, supervisors, counselors, and
others involved with EAPs.
Chapter 1 discusses the historical development of employee assistance
programs within the larger context of management and labor efforts to assist
alcoholic and other troubled employees. Chapter 2 describes the key components
of EAPs—the most important of which are (a) a written policy and (b) a program
coordinator whose primary function is to see that procedures and policies are
implemented throughout the workplace and that employees in need of counseling
services receive them. Chapter 3 focuses on the primary issues in program
development: program strategies and their effectiveness and corporate and union
responsibilities in relation to the provision of services and confidentiality. Chapter
4 examines what happens when alcoholic and other troubled employees involve
their employers in workers' compensation and arbitration cases, and the role of
EAPs in such cases. Chapter 5 emphasizes the need for program evaluation, basic
research, and education and training to integrate research into practice.
In this Key Issues report we hope to clarify some of the confusion
surrounding EAPs by addressing the basic issues often raised by executives and
union leaders setting out to implement new programs or involved in maintaining
and improving existing programs. The report is based on the applied and evaluation
research that has been accumulating very slowly since the publication in 1972 of
Spirits and Demons at Work: Alcohol and Drugs on the Job (Trice and
Roman, revised in 1978). As in these earlier publications, we highlight the
workplace dynamics and the importance of impaired job performance as the basis
for constructive intervention, usually by the employee's immediate supervisor.
The importance of this approach has been underscored in recent cases of drug
screening and Fourth Amendment rights. As evidenced by the courts and by
arbitrators, the importance of the impairment standard is that it shifts the issue from
the privacy rights of the employee to the legitimate right of the employer to
intervene "because impaired performance violates the fundamental contract between
vii
employer and employees" (Trice and Roman, 1978:xiv). The following response
to the question of when drug screening might be justified suggests that EAPs
provide a viable alternative to drug screening-an alternative that is more consistent
with American traditions of fairness and justice than is drug testing.
Acknowledgments
We wish to thank a number of people who have helped us in preparing this Key
Issues report. The "EAP Lunch Bunch,11 who read and commented on our early
draft, were particularly helpful. We would also like to thank our anonymous
reviewers for their feedback and Shirley Foster and Pat Noteboom for their patience
and diligence in typing the many drafts of this manuscript. Most of all we want to
thank Jozetta Srb, a research associate here at the school and our editor, for the
sincere interest she has taken in this manuscript. An original member of the Lunch
Bunch, she has patiently waded through an enormous amount of research to learn
about EAPs, knowledge she put to good work in prodding us to articulate clearly
the crucial balance. She was particularly helpful in revising chapter 4, for which
she sought out recent workers' compensation and arbitration cases. Finally, we
should like to thank R. Brinkley Smithers and the Christopher D. Smithers
Foundation for their financial support and encouragement.
viii
STRATEGIES FOR EMPLOYEE
ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS:
No one knows how many employee assistance programs (EAPs) currently exist
in the United States, but everyone agrees that since 1970 their number has increased
rapidly. William Dunkin, the former director of the National Council on
Alcoholism's Labor-Management Services, estimates that in 1970 there were
between three hundred and fifty and four hundred programs. The Executive
Caravan Surveys conducted in 1972, 1974, 1976, and 1979 found that the
percentage of Fortune 500 companies and leading utilities, transportation, and
financial corporations claiming to have programs increased from 25 percent in 1972
to 56 percent in 1979 (Roman, 1982). Some current estimates put the number of
U.S. companies with EAPs at more than five thousand and perhaps as many as ten
thousand (Bureau of National Affairs, 1986:40; Blum and Roman, 1985). The
Washington Business Group on Health predicts that EAPs will become the major
form for the delivery of mental health services to employees in the future
(Goldbeck, 1979).
Despite management and labor interest in EAPs, there is no consensus on what
constitutes a program. Companies call their programs by a bewildering number of
names: counseling, special health services, troubled employee, mental wellness,
occupational alcoholism, and, of course, employee assistance. Programs also
possess a wide variety of organizational structures. Some are located within
company medical departments and others within personnel departments; some are
administered by alcoholism specialists and others by mental health specialists-for
example, psychiatrists, psychologists, social workers; some offer employees
extensive in-house treatment services, and others refer employees to community
service agencies. Regardless of their tides and organizational structures, however,
all are concerned with preventing, identifying, and treating personal problems that
adversely affect job performance.
Employee Assistance Terms Defined
For the purpose of this report, we define EAPs as job-based programs operating
within a work organization for the purposes of identifying "troubled employees,"
motivating them to resolve their troubles, and providing access to counseling or
treatment for those employees who need these services. The term troubled
employee refers to those individuals whose personal problems (such as alcoholism,
drug addiction, marital difficulties, and emotional distress) preoccupy them to the
extent that in either their own or their supervisors1 judgment, their work is
disrupted. We use the term troubled for several reasons. First, despite the
expansive nature of psychiatric diagnosis, the majority of employees who use EAPs
do not appear to be seriously disturbed in a psychotic sense (Sonnenstuhl, 1986;
Trice and Beyer, 1984b). These employees are more appropriately described as
being chronically troubled by their problems. Second, the term troubled employee
is historically consistent with the origin and use of the term employee assistance.
When the National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)
1
introduced the term employee assistance to distinguish their programs from those
being marketed by the National Council on Alcoholism, they described the program
as helping troubled employees to cope with personal problems. This usage was
picked up and popularized by James T. Wrich in his book The Employee
Assistance Program (1980). Finally, troubled employee reflects Robert M.
Emerson and Sheldon L. Messinger's usage in "The Micro-Politics of Trouble"
(1977). Employees' personal troubles are not static entities; rather they have a
natural history (Sonnenstuhl, 1986). Employees, either through self-reflection or
conversations with their coworkers and managers, are first vaguely aware that
something is wrong. In subsequent interaction, they either resolve their uneasiness
or discover that their problems are more troublesome than they had imagined. In
the process of searching for solutions, they come to see themselves as troubled.
Eventually, some of them seek help from the services provided by the EAP.
Within this context, supervisors identify troubled employees on the basis of
deteriorating job performance and use a strategy known as constructive
confrontation to motivate employees to resolve their troubles and improve their
performance. Constructive confrontation means that supervisors confront
employees with evidence of their unsatisfactory job performance, coach them on
ways to improve their work, urge them to use the services of the EAP if they have
personal problems, and, at the same time, emphasize to them the consequences of
continued poor performance.
Constructive confrontation proceeds in progressive stages. Initially, supervisors
informally discuss performance problems with employees, encouraging them to
seek help from the EAP if personal problems are adversely affecting their work. At
this stage, some employees will correct their performance and resolve their
problems without the help of the services provided by the EAP. For them,
feedback from their supervisors is sufficient motivation to change their behavior. If
employees do not improve their performance after several informal discussions,
supervisors then implement standard formal disciplinary procedures-verbal
warnings, written notices, suspension, and discharge. At each disciplinary step,
employees are urged to seek help from the EAP if personal problems are affecting
their performance.
Research from the industrial alcoholism studies shows that when this strategy is
properly implemented, most employees either will change their behavior or will
seek help from the EAP services before disciplinary action is initiated. In unionized
facilities, stewards also informally urge employees to improve performance and
resolve their troubles. In many instances, employees are encouraged by their
coworkers to seek help.
Throughout this monograph, we use the term counseling in a generic sense-that
is, to cover the assessment of employees' troubles, diagnosis, referral, and
treatment. Counseling services are provided either within the corporation, within
the community, or within some combination of the two. In-house EAP counseling
services generally are staffed by mental health or alcoholism specialists. Currently,
a wide variety of community organizations-such as alcoholism councils, family
service agencies, and mental health centers-and private consulting agencies contract
with companies to provide counseling services to employees. Since the mid-
2
seventies, these EAP service providers have proliferated, and they may now be the
predominant form in which counseling services are offered to employees. Indeed,
many companies and unions simply equate the use of such services with having an
EAP. As we point out in the pages that follow, however, a fully functioning
program recognizes and actively supports the roles played by supervisors,
stewards, and coworkers in preventing troubles, identifying troubled employees,
and motivating them to change their behavior.
Historical Antecedents of EAPs
Since the end of the nineteenth century, work organizations in the United States
have offered assistance to employees in many guises: social betterment, personnel
counseling, occupational mental health, and industrial alcoholism. Each of these
approaches blends management concerns for productivity with humanitarian
values-that is, employers believe that helping employees with their troubles
increases productivity. (A more extensive historical discussion than presented here
can be found in Sonnenstuhl, 1986; Trice and Beyer, 1984a; Steele, 1988; Roman,
1988; Ames, 1989; Staudenmeier, 1985. A detailed discussion of the social
betterment movement can be found in Brandes, 1970.)
Social Betterment
During the 1880s many companies began providing workers with social welfare
services. These services included inexpensive housing, company-sponsored
unions, sanitary working conditions, insurance, and pension plans, as well as
facilities for banking, recreation, medical care, and education. The National Civic
Foundation encouraged such employer philanthropy to ensure a stable labor force,
promote worker loyalty, combat unionism, and prevent strikes (Nelson and
Campbell, 1972). By 1913, there were approximately two thousand welfare
workers in industry (Carter, 1977).
During the mid-twenties the social betterment movement began to run out of
steam and by the mid-thirties it had run its course. According to Stuart D. Brandes
(1970), it died for several reasons. Employees became disenchanted with corporate
paternalism, the Depression forced companies to cut back on many operations, and
the Wagner Act of 1936 outlawed company-sponsored unions and encouraged
employees to organize independently. Since companies had lost the struggle against
unionism, they saw little reason to continue many of the betterment programs.
Such services as health examinations, pensions, and other benefits still exist, but
the comprehensive welfare programs of the social betterment era are gone.
Personnel Counseling
Personnel counseling grew out of the works of Elton Mayo (1923) and the
experiments conducted at Western Electric's Hawthorne plant during the twenties
and thirties-reported by Fritz Roethlisberger and William J. Dickson (1939). Mayo
believed that employees' irrational sentiments prevented them from cooperating
with management and caused unionization, slowdowns in production, and strikes.
Consequently, he recommended that companies develop psychiatric clinics "to
eliminate eccentricities from 'normal' persons engaged in industry" (Mayo,
3
1923:483). The researchers discovered that workers at the Hawthorne plant
systematically restricted output; established a "fair day's rate"; falsified records; and
subjected "rate busters" to ostracism, sabotage, and physical threats. Following
Mayo's thinking, the researchers interpreted the workers' lack of cooperation with
management as irrational and believed that the irrational sentiments had been
overcome by paying attention to workers' feelings and concerns. They reasoned
that demonstrating concern for workers increases their morale and thereby improves
productivity.
Western Electric's personnel counseling program, also called "control through
listening" (Dickson and Roethlisberger, 1966), trained some of the shop workers to
be counselors. These "counselors" wandered the shop floors, talked informally
with employees about personal and work issues, and invited those in need of
further counseling to their offices. The counselors listened empathetically to the
employees but did not give advice. They encouraged the workers to release their
pent-up feelings and to work through their problems rationally. Throughout the
forties and fifties, Western Electric's program was widely emulated by other
companies (Bellows, 1961).
There is little empirical research to support the conclusions reached in the
Hawthorne studies. For example, Alex Carey (1967) and A. J. M. Sykes (1965)
reexamined the Hawthorne studies and concluded that Roethlisberger and Dickson
were incorrect and that the data, rather than supporting human relations theory,
supported an old-world view about the value of monetary incentives, driving
leadership, and discipline. Reviewing the empirical research produced by the
human relations school, Charles Perrow (1972) reached a similar conclusion.
Nevertheless, the human relations theory remains a dominant management
philosophy, which is reflected in the number of companies calling their personnel
departments by the title "human resources management."
Occupational Mental Health
Occupational mental health programs have taken two approaches to emotional
problems in the workplace. The first approach emphasizes treatment for
emotionally impaired employees. Employees seek treatment either on their own
initiative or at management's encouragement. The second approach focuses on the
prevention of emotional problems in employees. Preventive activities consist of
teaching healthy beliefs and behaviors and designing healthy work environments.
Both approaches have been part of mental health programs since psychiatrists began
working in industry (see, for example, Burlingame, 1946; Southard, 1920).
Prior to World War II, only a handful of psychiatrists, psychologists, and
psychiatric social workers were employed in industry. When the war drained the
available labor pool and industries had to employ inexperienced workers, however,
the government funded hundreds of mental health and social service programs in
industry in an effort to help integrate these employees into the workplace (Carter,
1977). For example, Bertha C. Reynolds (1975) pioneered psychiatric social
work with the National Maritime Union's United Seamen's Service and Dr. F. W.
Dershimer established a psychiatric practice at DuPont (Ferguson and Fersing,
1965). Employees, however, were primarily treated in "emotional first-aid
4
stations" (Lott, 1946), where, it was argued, a minimum of on-the-job treatment
resulted in conspicuous on-the-job improvement (McLean, 1973).
After the war, the majority of companies shut down their mental health
programs, and throughout the fifties and sixties, the number of businesses with
programs remained small. For example, the Bureau of Business Research at the
University of Texas (Mumm and Spiegel, 1962) surveyed 1,100 companies with
"advanced personnel programs" and found that only 37 of the 567 companies that
replied to the survey had formal mental health programs. A Harvard Business
School report characterized management's disregard for employees' emotional
problems as a Legacy of Neglect (Ferguson and Fersing, 1965) and urged
companies to adopt mental health programs.
During the seventies and eighties, many companies developed prevention
programs focused on employees' emotional health. These efforts were primarily
intended to cut escalating health care costs and to increase declining worker
productivity. Wellness/health promotion programs, for example, teach workers
healthy beliefs and behaviors (e.g., Conrad, 1987a, 1987b, 1988; Fielding, 1984;
Sloan, Gruman, and Allegrante, 1987), and quality of work life demonstrations
redesign work in order to construct healthy environments (e.g., O'Toole,1973;
Faucheux, Amado, and Laurent, 1982; Pugh, Hickson, and Hinnings, 1985). The
impact of these programs on employees' emotional health, productivity, and health
costs has not been rigorously evaluated (e.g., Sonnenstuhl, 1988; Parker, 1985;
Becker, 1986).
An emerging preventive thrust centers on awareness of the workplace as a
source of risks for alcoholism and other behavioral disorders (Trice and
Sonnenstuhl, 1988; Trice and Sonnenstuhl, 1990). In short, this approach
recognizes that not only can the workplace be a locale for constructive confrontation
but also that it contains clear-cut hazards and risks. Examples are the presence of
occupational drinking cultures, mobile jobs, work-related stress, plant closings
and hostile takeovers, deskilling, and mandatory retirement. Efforts to reduce
these risks constitute a preventive effort, making the workplace less an "enabler" of
drug abuses and other psychiatric disorders. For instance, the definition of the
appropriate use of alcohol at the workplace may be changed relatively easily by
addressing drinking norms directly (e.g., using alcohol at lunch is inappropriate),
problem drinkers on mobile jobs can be transferred to ones providing closer
supervision, and mandatory retirements can be made more flexible so that an older
person's structure and purpose are not suddenly shattered by retirement.
Industrial Alcoholism
Industrial alcoholism programs were started during World War II (Trice and
Schonbrunn, 1981). Because problem drinking adversely affects work
performance, these programs use the power of the job to motivate problem drinkers
to change their behavior. When problem drinkers are confronted with the prospect
of losing their jobs because of unsatisfactory work performance and, at the same
time, are offered rehabilitation, they are likely to opt for treatment, become sober,
and improve their performance. During the sixties, this concept evolved into the
constructive confrontation strategy.
5
Early industrial alcoholism programs were informal arrangements between
"occupational physicians" and dedicated members of Alcoholics Anonymous (AA).
The physicians often became aware of employees' drinking problems because
supervisors reported them. Supervisors' suspicions were based on observations of
drinking on the job or of disruptive behavior; often they were based on personal
experiences and gossip. The doctors then encouraged AA members to approach the
suspects and impress on them that they were in danger of losing their jobs and that
if they sought help through AA, they could gain sobriety and retain their positions.
Individual companies gradually transformed this informal procedure into a formal
policy and program. The policy stated that alcoholism is a disease and stressed the
company's willingness to help alcoholics. Each program had an administrator,
often a member of AA, who either referred the alcoholic to AA or to an alcoholism
treatment program.
After the war, the Yale Center for Alcohol Studies promoted programs among
business and labor leaders. By the mid-fifties, there were approximately fifty to
sixty industrial alcoholism programs in the United States (Trice and Schonbrunn,
1981). In 1959, the National Council on Alcoholism (NCA), which had been allied
with Yale, began marketing programs. Lewis F. Presnall (1966), NCA's industrial
consultant, advocated the development of broad-based programs to assist alcoholic
and other troubled employees and the training of supervisors to implement the
constructive confrontation strategy. Based on his earlier experience as director of
Kennecott Copper's Chino Mines Counseling Program and research developed by
Harrison M. Trice (1962a, 1962b), Presnall believed that this was the most
effective means of reaching alcoholic employees. By 1970, industrial programs
were considered an integral ingredient in the identification and treatment of
alcoholics. Consequently, when the federal government established the NIAAA in
1971, an "occupational" branch was organized to market programs to business and
labor.
Employee Assistance Programs
NIAAA coined the term employee assistance program to establish an identity
separate from the National Council on Alcoholism. The institute believed that
alcoholism was the most prevalent personal problem of employees and that the
workplace was the most effective place to identify, motivate, and provide for
treatment of alcoholics. To promote EAPs, NIAAA funded two occupational
program consultants (OPCs) in each state. Many of the OPCs recruited were not
alcoholism treatment advocates; rather they were psychologists and social workers
trained in the mental health traditions. Thus, the OPCs split into two groups-the
alcoholism constituency and the mental health constituency.
Both groups promoted EAPs with similar claims that employees' personal
problems are caused by factors outside the workplace and treating those problems
will improve employees' job performance. Both recommended that supervisors be
trained in constructive confrontation and that employees be encouraged to refer
themselves for counseling to the program. But the two groups differed in their
emphasis. The alcoholism constituency emphasized the importance of treating
alcoholism and the centrality of the constructive confrontation strategy for
6
motivating alcoholics. The mental health constituency emphasized the importance
of treating all personal problems equally, deemphasized the constructive
confrontation strategy, and stressed that troubled employees must seek help from
the EAP on their own initiative. Paul M. Roman (1981) and Harrison M. Trice
and Janice M. Beyer (1984a) have found that in adopting EAPs, some employers
have shown considerable interest in the mental health group's emphasis because
they believe that providing counseling services that the employees can use is
sufficient and will relieve supervisors from having to manage difficult workers.
Why EAPs Are Adopted
Between 1974 and 1976, the OPC network in New York State helped to
develop or revitalize over three hundred and twenty job-based programs (Trice,
Beyer, and Coppess, 1981). Between 1971 and 1980, OPC efforts helped to
increase the number of national programs from approximately three hundred and
fifty to an estimated five thousand. And by 1981, their success had spawned some
two hundred private EAP consulting services selling employee counseling to
companies (Roman, 1981). Why do companies adopt EAPs? Several rationales
are evident. Companies adopt EAPs primarily on ideological grounds. Data from
national surveys reported by Roman (1982) and from a field study by Trice and
Beyer (1984a) using both quantitative and qualitative methods indicate that
employers concerned about their employees1 welfare and those concerned about
their social responsibility to the community are more likely to adopt EAPs than
employers who do not express these sentiments. Simply stated, programs are
adopted because employers believe that helping employees to solve their personal
problems is good business and demonstrates social responsibility.
It is often suggested that companies adopt programs because they are cost-
effective. Although it is extremely difficult to obtain accurate cost-benefit
predictions for many management programs (Strauss and Sayles, 1967),
cost-benefit analyses reporting significant benefits from industrial alcoholism
programs have been published. These reports use a number of different methods
for analyzing program costs and benefits (Schramm, 1980; Trice, 1980). The most
common method is to compare employee performance prior to treatment with
performance after treatment and to assign a dollar value to it. A wide range of
indicators have been used to evaluate performance, including number of days
absent, number of on-the-job and off-the-job accidents, number of discipline and
grievance procedures, amount of insurance premiums, and amount of work
completed. These studies generally report significant benefits, which they attribute
to program treatment. At least one early study of an Ohio firm, however, did
conclude that treatment of problem drinkers and employees with other personal
problems was not economically efficient (Winslow et al., 1966).
According to Roman (1982), employers who adopt EAPs report their programs
are cost-effective, and some are able to produce cost-benefit analyses to prove it.
Alternatively, companies that have not adopted EAPs reject the notion that programs
are cost-effective. This difference probably reflects the underlying ideologies of the
employers. Those who believe that helping employees is good business uncritically
accept the analyses as supporting their decisions to adopt EAPs and those who
reject this belief characterize the analyses as methodologically flawed.
7
Martin Shain and Peggie Walden (1980) suggest the possibility that managers
also adopt EAPs as "conflict-avoiding devices." Based on fair employment laws
and labor contracts, the amount of discretion that employers can use in hiring,
supervising, and firing employees is often restricted. For example, some labor
arbitrators have ruled that dismissal and punitive discipline are inappropriate for
employees with alcohol, drug, and emotional problems; and they have
recommended that employers provide help for troubled employees (Denenberg and
Denenberg, 1983; Greenbaum, 1982). In this context, rehabilitation is seen as a
first step in helping employees to cope, and dismissal is considered a last resort
(Emerson, 1981), to be used when all else fails.
Union Reactions to Employee Assistance
Historically, union leaders have had mixed reactions to management programs to
assist employees. On the one hand, they want the services for their members; on
the other, they perceive such services as attempts to undermine the union's
authority and its traditional role as helper to union members (see, for example,
Baritz, 1961; Brandes, 1970; Carter, 1977). Such concerns are not unfounded.
For example, the National Civic Federation promoted social betterment as a way to
deter union organizing (Brandes, 1970; Nelson and Campbell, 1972), and the
Hawthorne experiments and their attendant counseling programs were undertaken
in part to keep Western Electric union-free (Baritz, 1961).
Unions prefer to operate their own mental health programs and have provided
members with a wide range of services. Since World War II, the AFL-CIO's
Community Services Department has operated a peer counseling program for its
members. Its former director, Leo Perlis (1980), calls it the oldest continuous EAP
in the United States. Its structure parallels Western Electee's Personnel Counseling
Program, and since its inception, several hundred thousand union members have
been trained to counsel millions of coworkers about a wide range of troubles. In
addition, many of the AFL-CIO's central labor councils also provide professional
mental health and social services to members. During the forties, fifties, and sixties
a number of unions established their own comprehensive psychiatric clinics as well
(Ferguson and Fersing, 1965; McLean, 1973). More recently, some unions have
developed pretreatment referral programs. These programs contract with an
employer to provide diagnostic and referral services for troubled employees
(Johnson, 1981). In New York State, the International Longshoremen's
Association and the National Maritime Union of America operate such programs.
In promoting EAPs, the NCA and the NIAAA have encouraged labor and
management to develop joint programs, but such development has been slow (Trice
and Beyer, 1982a; Johnson, 1981). Unions distrust the idea of constructive
confrontation because they condemn formal rating and supervisory evaluation
methods as inconsistent with the seniority principle (Trice, Hunt, and Beyer,
1977). They believe that programs should be used to create well-adjusted human
beings rather than to increase production (Perlis, 1980). Unions are also wary of
any management program focused on mental health problems (Roman, 1981).
They fear that the inclusive nature of mental health diagnosis is an open-ended
device whereby union members who challenge management authority can be
diagnosed as troubled employees, then treated and eventually fired. These concerns
8
are difficult to overcome, but Beyer, Trice, and Richard Hunt (1980) have found
that where management and labor are able to cooperate, they have helped alcoholic
and other troubled employees.
Member Assistance
Although the majority of research on EAPs has focused on supervisors'
interventions with alcoholic and other troubled employees, there is a growing body
of literature on peer interventions. Peer confrontation represents the power of
occupations to intercede and assist their members. For instance, many unions
(e.g., Molloy, 1989; Weed, 1980; Miller and Oliver, 1988; Feuer, 1987; Eichler,
Goldberg, Kier, and Allen, 1988) as well as some occupational and professional
associations (e.g., Bissell and Haberman, 1984; McCrady, 1989; Kilburg,
Nathan, and Thoreson, 1986), operate their own member assistance programs
(MAPs). Unlike EAPs, which primarily emphasize the role of supervisors, MAPs
emphasize the role of peers in identifying and motivating alcoholic and other
troubled employees to change their behavior (Trice and Sonnenstuhl, 1990a;
Sonnenstuhl, 1990). Often MAPs are built around a group of occupational
members who belong to Alcoholics Anonymous and carry the fellowship's
message of sobriety to their coworkers (Sonnenstuhl and Trice, 1987). Within this
context, peers use their own version of constructive confrontation. The AAs
confront suspected coworkers on and off the job, emphasizing that the coworkers'
drinking is adversely affecting their work, family, and social relations and that help
is available through the member assistance program and Alcoholics Anonymous.
The constructive confrontation strategy employed by peers, however, is more
flexible than that employed by supervisors in joint management-union programs
because peers need not confine their interventions to observations of unsatisfactory
performance. Peers are free to confront coworkers on the basis of gossip and off-
the-job behavior. The gossip generally includes talk about how the coworkers'
drinking is affecting their performance, but it also includes talk about family and
physical problems. In the ensuing confrontations, the AAs use such evidence to
demonstrate to coworkers how drinking is destroying their lives.
9
Summary
Against a historical backdrop, EAPs can easily be seen to be descendants of a
long line of programs combining concerns for productivity and compassion. At
times employers adopted these programs to avoid unionization and retain control of
the workplace. Many, however, adopted programs because they believed that
helping employees solve their troubles is good for workers as well as the company.
This ideology is, and will continue to be, a potent factor in the adoption of EAPs.
Unionized companies may have special problems in establishing and
implementing EAPs. Like their management counterparts, union officials believe
deeply in helping workers. But whereas employers perceive doing so is a way to
increase productivity, union officials see it as a way to maintain labor solidarity and
are wary of management control of the EAP at the company level. As a
consequence, conflict frequently ensues. Discovering ways to ensure a balance
between management and labor concerns is essential to the operation of EAPs in
unionized companies.
10
II
While there are some general guidelines for developing an EAP policy, the final
document should be shaped by a company's existing policies on performance,
discipline, and medical practices. The EAP policy is a bridge to these other
practices. The sample EAP policy (exhibit 1) is a skeleton that points out some of
the more general EAP principles. A company's final EAP policy, however, should
be fleshed out in accordance with its existing personnel policies and practices.
Above all, the policy should reflect the principle that, on one hand, an EAP is a
job-based technique for identifying troubled employees and motivating them to
change their behavior, and, on the other, it is a mechanism for providing access to
counseling services for employees.
11
Exhibit 1: A Sample Employee Assistance Program Policy
PURPOSE
XYZ Corporation cares about the well-being of its employees and recognizes that a variety of
personal problems can disrupt their personal and work lives. For instance, alcoholism is a
treatable disease with devastating effects on one's personal health, family, and work. Drugs,
family problems, and emotional distress can have similar effects. Most people solve their
problems either on their own or with the advice of family and friends; however, sometimes people
need professional advice. XYZ Corporation, through its EAP, provides access to professional
counseling services for its employees, and those in need of professional assistance are encouraged
to use it. In those facilities where XYZ Corporation has union contracts, the company will
conduct the EAP as a cooperative and joint venture with labor's elected representatives.
XYZ Corporation recognizes that it has no right to interfere unless employees' personal
problems adversely affect their job performance. When unsatisfactory performance does occur,
supervisors will encourage employees to solve their problems on their own or with the assistance
of the EAP services.
POLICY
The EAP operates within the following framework:
1. A wide range of problems may affect employees' job performance adversely.
These include alcohol and drug addiction, marital and family difficulties, and
emotional distress. The EAP will assist employees to resolve these problems and
others for which employees may seek help.
2. Employees' current jobs and future advancement will not be jeopardized by using
EAP services.
3. As with all health and personnel documents, EAP records will be maintained in a
confidential manner.
4. When necessary, sick leave may be granted for treatment and rehabilitation on the
same basis as it is granted for other health problems.
5. Employees will be responsible for complying with the EAP service's recommendations
and treatment plans.
6. The EAP service will also be available to employees' families.
PROCEDURE
1. Employees who need professional advice are encouraged to use the EAP's
counseling services, and those whose personal problems adversely affect their
work are encouraged to seek help voluntarily from the EAP services.
2. Supervisors are responsible for confronting employees about their unsatisfactory
performance and helping them to improve their work.
a. Supervisors bring employees' unsatisfactory work to their attention and
encourage them to solve the problem on their own or with the help of the EAP
counseling services. Supervisors also point out to the employees that
continued unsatisfactory performance will lead to formal discipline.
b. If performance improves, no further action will be taken.
c. If job performance continues to be unsatisfactory, regardless of whether or not
employees have accepted help, regular disciplinary procedure will be followed,
up to and including discharge. At each step of the procedure, supervisors will
encourage employees to seek help from the EAP counseling service.
12
Principle 2: Constructive confrontation is used to motivate employees to
resolve their problems and to overcome denial. In some instances, workers may
be unaware that they have a problem, either because no one has pointed it out to
them or because when someone has pointed it out, they have denied its existence.
Supervisors may become aware of employees' personal problems in the give and
take of everyday activities and offer them1 friendly advice or encourage them to seek
help from the EAP. When employees work deteriorates, supervisors confront
employees and help them correct their performance. Such confrontation occurs
within the company's established guidelines for due process, and at each step
employees are encouraged to solve the problems on their own or with the EAP's
assistance in order to prevent formal disciplinary action. Constructive confrontation
provides a powerful motivation for employees to solve their problems one way or
the other because it demonstrates both the possible consequences of inaction and a
way to help resolve the problems.
Principle 3: Counseling is used to help solve problems when it is clear that
they are beyond employees' control. As employees look for solutions, they may
eventually conclude that their own resources are exhausted and that the problems
are beyond their control. At this point, troubled employees are most susceptible to
seeking professional help (Sonnenstuhl, 1986). Rushing them into treatment at an
earlier stage puts them at risk of being labeled "mentally ill" unnecessarily.
According to Joseph Veroff et al. (1981), Americans continue to fear that they will
be stigmatized by going into mental health treatment, and they often reject the
"normal" person who seeks psychotherapy more than the "severely disturbed"
person who does not seek it (Phillips, 1963). In the process of looking for help,
however, employees may learn, in conversations with their supervisors and with
coworkers who have used the services of the EAP, to overcome the fear of
stigmatization (Sonnenstuhl, 1986, 1990; Harris and Fennell, 1988). When
employees do go to the EAP they want to be assured that the EAP will treat their
case confidentially and that their current and future positions with the company will
not be jeopardized by using the EAP services.
The sample EAP policy (exhibit 1) reflects these general principles and ensures
balance between constructive confrontation and counseling in the program. The
purpose clause establishes that the EAP is job-based and that employees normally
solve their problems without professional assistance. The policy section reflects the
company's commitment to helping employees work through their troubles. Within
this section, companies may wish to restate their current policies on the
confidentiality of personnel and medical records and its applicability to EAP
records. In this section, the company may also wish to integrate its policies on sick
leave. The procedures section of the EAP policy emphasizes the program's
availability to employees and describes how supervisors are to use the policy.
Within this section, the company should integrate its current policies on due
process.
EAP Sensitivity to Alcoholism
Historically, broadly focused EAPs developed out of job-based alcoholism
programs. Reflecting this development, there has been a great deal of discussion
among employee assistance workers whether EAPs ought to be alcoholism-
13
focused, often interpreted as alcohol-only, or broadly focused on all employee
troubles. In practical terms, this is a moot question because all contemporary EAPs
are broad-brush. Effective programs remain very sensitive toward alcohol abuse
and dependence, however, because they are the most prevalent psychiatric
disorders among Americans and because job-based strategies are highly effective in
reaching these workers.
A study of the lifetime prevalence of specific psychiatric disorders among
approximately seventeen thousand community residents over the age of eighteen
years showed alcohol abuse or dependence as the most common disorder (Robins
et al., 1984). A companion piece of research-a six-month prevalence study-
showed much the same thing (Myers et al., 1984). In addition, since alcoholism
carries an increased risk of death, alcohol dependency rates in older populations
may be reduced by mortality (Gallant, 1983). Similarly, research from the
National Institute of Drug Abuse reveals that alcohol is the most widely used and
abused drug in the United States (e.g., Johnston, O'Malley, and Bachman, 1987;
NIDA, 1987a, 1987b, 1987c ). These epidemiologic findings confirm the need for
EAPs to continue to focus primarily on alcoholism and alcohol abuse, although
most programs have expanded their efforts to help employees with other troubles.
Research also shows that "significant others" in the work environment-
managers, supervisors, and shop stewards-express considerable willingness to
identify and refer employees with disruptive drinking problems to treatment.
Ronald L. Crawford and Hugh Adamson (1980) demonstrated in a study of a large
multinational firm that managers more readily recognized and showed greater
readiness to use professional services for alcoholism cases than for six other types
of psychiatric disorders. This finding is consistent with what is shown in Cornell
University's Program on Alcoholism and Occupational Health data sets derived
from studies of managers in a large utility company (Trice, 1965); a large university
(Belasco and Trice, 1969); federal installations from all departments of the
executive branch of government (Beyer and Trice, 1978); and nationwide locations
of a private, for-profit manufacturing firm (Trice and Beyer, 1984b). Each of these
data sets shows a willingness among managerial personnel to identify employees
with alcohol-related problems and to refer them to professional services.
Over the past quarter of a century a "core technology" to deal with alcoholic
employees has developed (Roman and Blum, 1985, 1988a; Roman, 1988). In
sharp contrast, however, there has been little, if any, accumulated knowledge
regarding job-based strategies for other forms of emotional disturbances. Roman
and Terry C. Blum (1985:18) insist that "EAPs are singular in their provision of
constructive attention to alcohol problems in the workplace... .It is only in dealing
with alcohol problems that EAPs have established a clearcut record across different
workplaces and different degrees of program elaboration."
The Core Technology of EAPs
In addition to the centrality of employees' alcohol problems in EAPs, Roman
and Blum spelled out five other elements that are unique to EAP practice and
distinguish it from other workplace interventions.
14
First, the identification of employees' personal problems is based on job
performance, which is contrary to the usual approach of identifying personal
problems by more general symptoms. EAPs use the job performance standard for
two reasons: (1) according to standards of industrial justice, management cannot
intervene in employees1 personal lives unless performance is affected, and (2) there
is disagreement over the meaning of early versus late symptoms, even among
well-trained diagnosticians. By training supervisors and union stewards to pay
attention to performance issues, EAPs adhere to standards of industrial justice and
introduce an objective criterion for deciding when something becomes a problem.
Second, EAP specialists are expected to provide expert consultation and advice
to supervisors, managers, and union stewards on how to follow the program's
policies and procedures. Here the EAP specialist assists in deciding whether a
given case is appropriate for referral to the program's counseling component or
might be better managed by other means, such as retraining employees or
reassigning them to different jobs.
Third, EAP specialists are expected to advise and discuss with supervisors,
managers, and union stewards the strategy and appropriate use of constructive
confrontation throughout the entire process of referral and return to work.
Instruction in the use of constructive confrontation is important because the strategy
runs contrary to the overly sympathetic and helpful way most of us respond to
troubled people. Constructive confrontation allows supervisors to be supportive
while encouraging troubled employees to take responsibility for their behavior and
giving them options for doing so.
The fourth and fifth components consist of linking the program with community
resources when necessary. Here the EAP specialist (coordinator) uses knowledge
of confidentiality regulations and the specific types of community or
entrepreneurial service providers available-and exercises ethical judgment to avoid
unnecessary referrals as well as to avoid serving the vested treatment interests of
either nonprofit or for-profit organizations.
Taken as a whole, these elements of the core technology set EAP work apart
from that of other occupations. Other occupations may include one or two
components of the core technology, but none encompasses all of them. For
instance, social workers are well versed in referring employees to community
agencies but may have little training in how the workplace operates; personnel
managers understand the workplace but may have little knowledge of community
treatment resources.
Top-Management Support
According to folk wisdom, the most important factor in implementing policy is
the support of top management. Indeed, administration courses in schools of
management, industrial relations, social work, and public health tend to give
students the impression that once a decision is made at the top, its implementation
magically follows. Empirical research on EAPs does not support this impression.
While top management support for the EAP may be essential to policy adoption,
15
it is by no means sufficient for program implementation. For example, according to
Beyer and Trice (1978), many directors of federal installations were ambivalent
about implementing the government's alcoholism policy and their ambivalence
was communicated to supervisors and facilitators. Many directors, however,
supported the policy because they perceived a need for it in their installations.
These managers reflected that perception in their own implementing behavior,
which in turn affected the actions of program facilitators and supervisors,
regardless of whether the manager exercised a great deal or very little power in the
installations. The finding that directors who perceive a need for the policy are most
likely to implement it suggests that excess reliance on the influence of top
management to implement a policy may be misplaced. Excess reliance on the
power of top management may lead to the neglect of other implementing strategies,
such as creating familiarity with the policy-a force that Bradley Googins (1978) and
Googins and Norman Kurtz (1981) found to be very potent among lower-status
managers and facilitators.
Program Management and Coordination
Every company and union needs someone inside the work organization to
manage and coordinate the EAP. Management entails seeing that the EAP policies
and procedures are implemented throughout the organization, and coordination
essentially entails seeing that supervisors and stewards are aware of their role in the
program and that employees in need of services receive them. While it is tempting
to contract out these managing and coordinating responsibilities to EAP service
providers, it should be recognized that such agents may lack the necessary influence
and organizational knowledge of insiders. When working with agencies that
provide EAP counseling services, the program coordinator is responsible for
ensuring that supervisors and stewards receive appropriate training and alcoholic
and other troubled employees receive treatment when it is necessary. (See exhibits
2 and 3 for sample job descriptions of EAP staff.)
16
QUALIFICATIONS
1. A strong understanding of organizational structures and processes, including a
knowledge of XYZ's business units and its human resources management and
medical divisions.
2. A general understanding of the health and social service resources available to
XYZ's employees. Counseling experience may be helpful but is not required.
3. A high level of skills in program management and administration, written and oral
communications, education and training, and negotiating with outside organizations.
RESPONSIBILITIES
Every XYZ facility will designate an employee assistance coordinator. Who actually performs
this role may vary from location to location depending on the availability of personnel. In
facilities large enough to have a human resources management department and/or a medical office,
the coordinator will be recruited from one of those departments. In smaller facilities, the part-time
EAP role may be assumed by someone in either a line-management or staff position. Specific
responsibilities of the EAP coordinator include:
1. Publicizing the EAP policy and procedure to all employees and their families.
2. Training managers, supervisors, and union representatives in the use of the EAP
policy.
3. Consulting with managers, supervisors, and stewards about how to manage
alcoholic and other troubled employees.
4. Evaluating and maintaining a directory of health and social service resources available to
facility employees.
5. Negotiating contracts with, and closely monitoring, EAP service providers.
6. Making informal assessments of employees1 personal problems and directing them
to appropriate community resources for diagnosis and counseling.
7. Ensuring that employees receive appropriate assistance.
QUALIFICATIONS
Specific qualifications include:
1. A knowledge of the local facility's policies, practices, and procedures and of
local community resources.
2. A high level of compassion for employees' personal difficulties.
3. Skills in administration, verbal communication, education and training, and
community relations. Counseling experience is helpful but not necessary.
Specialists in the EAP field disagree about who should coordinate the program.
Wrich (1980) says that he knows people with a wide range of backgrounds who
perform this job successfully, including Ph.D. clinical psychologists, psychiatric
social workers, high school graduates, AA members, industrial nurses, and career
17
personnel administrators. He finds that, regardless of their backgrounds, all of
these people are sympathetic toward employees with problems and show a
willingness to help them. James Manuso (1983:122), however, states, "Educational
background should be at the doctoral level in psychology, psychiatry, or clinical
social work. Staff members should certainly be skilled diagnosticians and
practitioners of short-term group and individual psychotherapy." Disagreement
stems partially from different perceptions of the coordinator's function. Wrich sees
the coordinator doing preliminary assessments of employees1 problems and
referring the employees (when necessary) to outside resources for treatment.
Manuso sees the coordinator doing short-term counseling as well as referring
employees in need of longer-term treatment. Both, however, may overemphasize
the coordinator's role in counseling and deemphasize the role of internal change
agent.
Program coordinators are primarily internal change agents who ensure that the
EAP policy is implemented and that a balance between workplace dynamics and
counseling is maintained. Beyer and Trice (1978) studied the role of the program
coordinator when they examined the federal government's implementation of its
alcoholism and equal employment opportunity policies in a sample of seventy-one
installations. The coordinator role in those installations was part-time, and the
people assigned to it held other positions within the agencies as well. Sometimes
the positions were line management, and other times they were staff positions.
Implementation of the program consisted of publicizing the policies to all managers
and developing appropriate organizational structures to process individuals with
affirmative action complaints or drinking problems. In the alcoholism program,
coordinators trained managers and supervisors to use constructive confrontation
and referred problem drinkers to community rehabilitation programs for treatment.
In this study, Beyer and Trice found that effective alcoholism program
coordinators (1) held line-management rather than staff positions, (2) did not have
overly formalized job descriptions that restricted their actions, (3) were not
overloaded by the coordinator role, (4) had adequate staff and time to do the
coordinator's job, and (5) supported change generally and the alcoholism policy
specifically. These findings suggest that companies can implement effective
programs without greatly increasing personnel and by relying on community
agencies to provide treatment. Under these conditions coordinators are responsible
for training managers and supervisors and for directing employees needing help to
outside resouces.
Supervisory Training
Since the early 1970s, the job-performance model used in training supervisors
for their role in implementing industrial alcoholism programs has grown in
popularity (Etchen and Roman, 1977). Generally, the model consists of (1)
defining program policy, (2) emphasizing the degree of management support for it,
(3) explaining the supervisors' role in implementing it, and (4) demonstrating how
it can be integrated into supervisors' existing responsibilities for employee job
performance.
James A. Belasco and Trice (1969) demonstrated the model's effectiveness in a
controlled experiment. They divided 222 first-line supervisors into several groups:
18
Group A completed questionnaires (tests)-concerning their attitudes toward
alcoholism and other general emotional disturbances-before and after training;
Group B received training and completed only the posttraining questionnaire;
Group C completed pre- and posttraining questionnaires but received no training;
Group D completed only the posttraining questionnaire. In addition, two series of
training programs were run. During the first series supervisors received
instruction in how to manage problem employees generally; during the second
series supervisors received instruction in how to manage alcoholic employees.
Training in both groups consisted of case studies, reading assignments, lectures,
films, and discussions. The discussions focused on what supervisors would do in
each case, why they would do it, and the consequences of those actions.
Belasco and Trice concluded that (1) training alone produced relatively small
changes in the supervisors' willingness to confront alcoholic and troubled
employees, (2) completing the questionnaires (tests) alone produced rather
pronounced changes in supervisors' willingness to confront such employees, and
(3) the combination of testing and training produced more changes in their
willingness than did training alone. They also found that using an approach for
problem employees in general resulted in more favorable changes in supervisors'
willingness to confront them than did the traditional emphasis on alcoholic
employees-a finding that provided the major justification for the "broad-brush"
development of EAPs. Belasco and Trice further recommended that EAP training
be conducted within the context of a company's standard program for teaching
supervisors to conduct performance appraisals and manage marginal performers.
A number of research instruments could be used to assess the impact of
supervisory training: attitude and behavior change of supervisors (Belasco and
Trice, 1969), the best-worst technique (Beyer and Trice, 1984), receptivity to use
of the EAP/aJcoholism policy (Beyer and Trice, 1978), and the behavioral index of
troubled employees (Bayer and Gerstein, 1988). Such instruments could be used
to assess supervisors' attitudes toward and receptivity to the constructive
confrontation strategy before and after training.
Peer Training
Peers play important roles in both employee and member assistance programs.
They constructively confront troubled coworkers, share their own troubled
experiences with them, and tell them about the program's effectiveness and
trustworthiness. Although data suggest that these roles are critical in helping
coworkers to see themselves as troubled and decide to take advantage of the
program (e.g., Sonnenstuhl, 1982, 1990; Harris and Fennell, 1989), few
organizations, with the exception of the AFL-CIO's community services (Perlis,
1980) and some member assistance programs such as the National Maritime Union
(Molloy, 1989) and the Airline Flight Attendants Association (Feuer, 1987), have
developed peer training. Consequently, almost nothing is known about what
constitutes effective training for these roles.
In the future, both employee and member assistance programs will need to
develop peer training. Building on the experience of the AFL-CIO community
services and member assistance programs, such training would teach peers to
19
identify troubled coworkers, confront them constructively, and refer them for help.
In addition to providing peers with information on the work organization's own
assistance program, training needs to acquaint them with the wide range of personal
problems coworkers face and the variety of personal and community resources
available for resolving them.
Employee Education
Employee education has always been a part of occupational programs, and the
newer, broad-based EAPs continue to conduct education for all employees.
Today's curricula include posters, brochures, and workshops about a bewildering
number of personal troubles and their solutions (Presnall, 1981). Educational
materials generally stress prevention of problems, their early warning signs, and
the availability of referral to professional help when problems occur. Martin Shain
and Judith Groeneveld (1980) urge EAPs to develop workshops on life skills and
health, decision making, values clarification, and information giving-and to
coordinate their activities with such health promotion efforts as stress reduction,
weight control, exercise, and diet (see also Shain, Suurvali, and Boutilier, 1986).
Underlying all of these educational efforts is the basic assumption that mental
health treatment is the "modern" and "scientific" way to solve personal problems
and most individuals reject it out of ignorance and adherence to "primitive beliefs."
Education, then, is often meant to instruct employees in the "proper" attitudes so
that they will use mental health services "appropriately." This assumption,
however, remains unsubstantiated (Becker, 1979); it is just as likely that employees
adopt proper beliefs about mental health in response to using the services. EAP
specialists, for example, do not assume that simply providing health information
will prompt troubled employees to adopt new attitudes, take better care of
themselves, or seek help through the EAP. Indeed, this is a complex social process
in which people alternately seek and receive advice about their health conditions and
the options available to them, and such social processes have been found to be
remarkably resistant to change by health educators (Sonnenstuhl, 1982, 1986).
Consequently, troubled employees often must be confronted by family, friends,
coworkers, and supervisors before they will change their beliefs and behavior.
What kind of employee education is needed or appropriate for the EAP? At a
minimum, employees need to be aware of the company's policy and program, and
such information should be widely disseminated. Unfamiliarity with the policy and
its scope is likely to prevent employees from using it or lead to inappropriate use
(Harris and Fennell, 1988; Reichman and Beidel, 1989). Education programs,
however, might include information about a wide range of personal problems and
solutions-for example, information about alcohol and drug abuse, family problems
and stress management, what employees can do for themselves, self-help groups,
and professional counseling. This selection of subject matter would make
employees aware of the scope of the company's commitment to help them and also
encourage employees to help themselves.
A form of employee education called "wellness" has recently become popular.
According to Rebecca S. Parkinson and Associates (1982), the effectiveness of
these programs is untested, however, and probably will remain so since it is
20
difficult to know if the program alone has prevented emotional and psychiatric
disturbances. Many observers believe that the conspicuously well are attracted to
and participate in the programs (Conrad, 1987b, 1988). Nevertheless, there is an
inherent appeal in employee training in diet control, exercise, relaxation, smoking
cessation, coping techniques, and health screening. These strategies have been
imported into many workplaces by EAP practitioners because of pressures to
contain health costs, but they are not part of the EAP core technology. The best
evidence is that such tactics may reduce the risk of such physical conditions as
cancer and heart disease if employees can be induced to eat well, stop smoking, and
exercise. But there appears to be little, if any, evidence that they prevent alcohol
abuse or the many other psychiatric troubles that beset a work force. Shain and his
colleagues (1986) present evidence suggesting that a well-organized education
program can reduce the amount of alcohol employees consume and promote
appropriate beliefs about drinking. While it appears that such a program can
encourage moderate drinkers to reduce their consumption, it is unlikely that heavy
drinkers would react similarly. Given the voluntary nature of the program studied,
it is likely that alcoholic employees opted out of it entirely. For instance, Harris
and Fennell (1988) found that heavy drinkers were unlikely to use an EAP, and
this finding may also apply to wellness programs. Strictly speaking, wellness
programs are adjunct services that employees can be referred to by the EAP. For
detailed comparisons of employee assistance and wellness programs see Roman
and Blum, 1987, 1988, and Sonnenstuhl, 1988.
Effective EAPs utilize two sets of beliefs that enable them to distinguish
between alcoholic and other troubled employees (Sonnenstuhl, 1990). According
to the mental health ideology, each individual is unique and must learn to adapt to
the multiple, often competing, roles of modern life. Consequently, counseling
consists of learning to identify the unique self and to nurture and use it in
confronting the world. Treatment then becomes a cooperative venture in which the
client is sufficiently motivated to help the counselors identify the problem and work
toward its resolution. In contrast, according to the alcoholism ideology, alcoholism
is a disease characterized by denial, which must be overcome so that the client will
be motivated to quit drinking and pursue sobriety. This means that counselors
must be more confrontative with alcoholics than with other troubled employees who
are perceived as counselors' allies. In confronting the alcoholic employee,
counselors downplay the unique self and underscore that a "healthy" life is
possible only if the individual joins Alcoholics Anonymous and follows its twelve
steps to sobriety. Keeping these ideologies in balance appears to make for effective
employee/member assistance programs.
21
Practitioners distinguish between services that are provided internally and those
provided externally. Large work organizations may hire their own alcoholism
counselors, social workers, or clinical psychologists to counsel employees.
Smaller companies may contract with community therapists and agencies to provide
treatment services. Whether internal or external services are chosen, it is important
that the constructive confrontation strategy that takes place in the workplace and the
counseling component remain in balance; that is, companies and unions must
recognize that supervisors, stewards, and counselors have equally important, albeit
different, functions to play in the EAP.
In-House Services
In-house services consist of a wide variety of activities, ranging from simple
diagnosis and referral to extensive psychotherapeutic treatment of employees.
Programs with in-house services are generally staffed by mental health
professionals with strong clinical backgrounds. Many examples of this type of
program structure exist, and the literature contains descriptions of several large
organizations providing in-house services: Equitable Life Assurance Society
(Manuso, 1983) and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (Feinstein and Brown,
1982) were reported to employ social workers, psychologists, and certified
alcoholism counselors who saw troubled employees during working hours. In
such instances, most counseling is by EAP staff and employees requiring more
specialized treatment are referred to outside agencies, particularly if the employees
need to be treated within long-term intensive rehabilitation programs. But even
long-term treatment is not beyond the scope of some EAP programs. For example,
Ann Bensinger and Charles F. Pilkington (1983) reported that United Technologies
Corporation operated its own alcoholism rehabilitation program.
Companies develop in-house services for a number of reasons. Many do so
because top executives are unfamiliar with mental health treatment generally and, to
ensure expertise in this area, hire clinicians to develop the programs. Some
companies provide in-house services because the employers believe this is the most
tangible way to express their humanitarian concerns to employees. Others do so
because they believe it is cost-effective. For example, United Technologies
implemented its alcoholism treatment program after evaluating the costs of treating
its alcoholic employees and concluding that many employees could be treated more
quickly and less expensively in a company-run program than in the standard
twenty-eight-day rehabilitation format.
Companies are most apt to provide in-house services in facilities with large
concentrations of employees because providing such services in smaller facilities is
not considered cost-effective. For example, reports indicate that Equitable Life and
Metropolitan Life did not duplicate their staff structures outside of corporate
headquarters and United Technologies did not duplicate its rehabilitation program
outside of Connecticut because the number of employees in other locations did not
justify such arrangements (Manuso, 1983; Feinstein and Brown, 1982).
In-house services are criticized for possibly jeopardizing employees' rights.
Some therapists argue that many employees who need professional help will not
22
use in-house services because they are afraid that management will learn of their
problems and hold it against them. This logic may be persuasive in some ways, but
empirical research has not resolved the argument. It is more certain, however, that
in-house services present therapists with conflicts of interests (Sonnenstuhl, 1986).
On the one hand, professional ethics stress that therapists must always act in the
best interest of their patients. On the other hand, as employees of the company,
they may feel compelled to resolve conflicts in the interest of their employer. When
therapists try to work out these conflicting demands, employees' best interests
might be compromised.
External Services
Many companies now contract with profit and nonprofit organizations to provide
mental health services for troubled employees (Feinstein and Brown, 1982;
Presnall, 1981). Some of these outside agencies provide a variety of services other
than treatment, for example, supervisor training, diagnoses of employees'
problems, and referrals to other treatment agencies. Service providers often operate
a form of hotline that employees in great distress can use to call for immediate help.
Companies are attracted to contract services for various reasons. Management
may see contracting out as a quick and efficient way to implement a program in
which no one in the company needs to take on the job of counseling employees and
referring them to outside resources for help. This arrangement is particularly
attractive to busy managers who are simply delegated the responsibility of
coordinating the program. Some executives like the idea of contract services
because they fear that if company clinicians treat employees, the company might be
liable for medical malpractice (Sonnenstuhl, 1986). They believe that contract
services are a way of shifting medical liabilities away from the company. Whether
this is so remains a question, but it is likely that contracting out to EAP service
providers merely increases the number of people who will be sued in malpractice
cases. Contract services do have one major drawback: many of the groups that
offer services do not have a great deal of experience with the workplace and may
emphasize counseling and deemphasize the role of supervisors in identifying and
motivating troubled employees. This posture can be particularly troublesome if
service providers train supervisors because there would be a tendency to
overemphasize the need to rush employees to professional treatment.
Research indicates that companies contemplating contracts with outside agencies
should consider integrating EAP training into their standard supervisory training
program, where it can be done by company personnel. If outside service persons
are allowed to do the training, the program coordinator should work closely with
them to ensure that the focus on job performance is maintained. In any event,
whenever a company or union uses an outside EAP service provider, or other
community resources, the program coordinator retains responsibility for ensuring
that supervisors and stewards receive appropriate training and that alcoholic and
troubled employees get adequate help.
Community Resource Network
23
what we call the community resource network. This strategy recognizes that
agencies outside the company already provide a wide range of counseling services
that are available to employees and that the program coordinator's function is to
direct employees to those resources. This strategy was used by the federal
government in the implementation of its alcoholism policy and by William J.
Sonnenstuhl in the implementation of International Paper Company's EAP. In
International Paper's program, for example, the employee relations manager at each
of the company's local facilities was designated as the EAP coordinator. He or she
trained supervisors and union officials for their role in the program, conducted a
survey and compiled a list of all the community services, and provided employees
with such educational materials and programs as posters, films, and brochures.
There are several advantages to using the community resource network: (1)
treatment can be provided in the community under a company's existing medical
coverage, and (2) most local facilities come to feel that they have a vested interest
in the program and, therefore, may be more committed to making it work than
would those that do not have this sense of ownership. Nevertheless, there is at
least one disadvantage. When the local facility does not feel attached to the EAP
itself but to the coordinator and the coordinator leaves, the program may fall into
disrepair unless a new coordinator is designated quickly and establishes rapport
with the local agencies. Maintaining this form of counseling model also requires
continual reassessment of the community network and its functioning.
Union Support and Involvement
Beyer, Trice, and Hunt (1980) have found that in unionized facilities, union
support and involvement greatly improve the effectiveness of EAPs. For example,
they found for several reasons that supervisors in unionized federal installations
were more likely than supervisors in nonunion installations to use the government's
alcoholism policy. First, the unions generally supported the policy because they
viewed it as an additional benefit for their members and a method of extending their
traditional helping role to alcoholic employees. Second, union support was
conveyed to supervisors in training sessions emphasizing general supervisory
skills. Finally, unions emphasized their intentions to go to arbitration in cases in
which supervisors failed to confront alcoholic employees and to offer them
assistance. Thus, supervisors in unionized facilities were well informed about the
unions' support of the policy and were therefore more willing to use it.
Most labor-management experts would agree that to ensure support for the EAP,
the union should be involved in the formulation of policy. When left out, the union
will find it politically difficult to support the EAP, although it might see cooperation
as highly desirable. Involvement can be either informal or formal. The policy and
program may be worked out informally in a labor-management committee (Dyer,
Lipsky, and Kochan, 1977) or formally as part of the collective bargaining
agreement (Denenberg and Denenberg, 1983). The EAP's effectiveness, however,
may be greatest when labor and management work together informally.
Under the best of circumstances, labor-management cooperation on EAPs is
difficult because of the traditional adversarial approach of industrial and labor
relations. Leroy Johnson (1981), in a study of labor and management support for
24
EAPs, concludes that even when program aims are rather modest, cooperation is
difficult to accomplish. Trice and Beyer (1982a) found that cooperation on an
alcoholism policy is more likely to occur in union locals in which the officers
perceive problem drinking as a minor occurrence than in locals in which there is the
perception of a great deal of problem drinking. Cooperation is also more likely to
occur between managers and younger, lower-level union officers than between
managers and higher-level officers-who may see such cooperation as a political
liability. Union support and involvement can be increased by including union
officials in sessions that train managers and supervisors to use the constructive
confrontation strategy fairly and compassionately.
In many instances, unions develop EAPs on their own without any management
involvement. Effective union-based member assistance programs usually include
(1) a policy statement that is widely disseminated to union members, (2)
unequivocal support from union officers and business agents, (3) an enthusiastic
program coordinator who is a union member and is given the time and resources to
make things work, (4) a steward training program, (5) a peer training program, (6)
a member education program, and (7) a mechanism for providing members and
their families with appropriate counseling services.
Some labor leaders and researchers question whether the EAP core technology
also applies to member assistance programs. In particular, they ask whether the job
performance standard and the use of constructive confrontation fit with the union's
responsibility to protect members' jobs. Research with the Tunnel and
Construction Workers MAP strongly suggests that they do but that they take on
slightly different meanings in union programs than in joint management-labor
programs (Sonnenstuhl and Trice, 1987). In joint programs, job performance acts
as the cue for supervisors to confront employees because, according to standards of
industrial justice, they cannot interfere in employees' private lives unless personal
problems adversely affect job performance. Union members are not bound by
any such standard and are free to intervene in employees' private lives on the basis
of other knowledge about coworkers' personal problems. Similarly, constructive
confrontation takes on slightly different meanings in each type of program. In joint
management-labor programs, constructive confrontation is integrated with the
agreed-upon disciplinary process. Again, because unions are not bound by the
same rules as management, the process is more fluid in union programs (see
Sonnenstuhl and Trice, 1987). In both types of programs, however, it is
employees' awareness that their deteriorating job performance may lead to job loss
that motivates them to change their behavior.
25
Summary
Written EAP policies are essential in maintaining a job-based focus, with job
performance as a criterion, and in emphasizing the balance between the role of
managers, supervisors, and stewards in constructive confrontation and the role of
clinicians and other professionals in counseling. Research shows that while top
management support is necessary for program adoption, it is not always sufficient
for program implementation; program coordinators do not need clinical training to
implement policy, and the most effective EAP training for supervisors emphasizes
general supervisory skills for managing marginal performers. The practical
experience of many existing programs indicates that companies need not provide
in-house counseling services to their employees since there are other ways to
provide such services outside of the company, some of which may offer better
options for maintaining a balance between constructive confrontation and
counseling. Finally, experience and research indicate that in unionized companies,
labor and management need to cooperate from the beginning of policy formulation
to ensure that the program is effective.
26
m
To some extent all EAPs contain elements of both constructive confrontation and
counseling strategies. In exhibit 4, however, we have broken them into their
respective components to hypothesize two extreme models-those programs that
emphasize constructive confrontation and those that emphasize counseling. These
two types would occupy ends of a continuum along which actual programs with
varying degrees of constructive confrontation and counseling could be aligned.
27
When examining program strategies, several questions are inevitably raised.
What is the strategy? What are the assumptions underlying it? And what outcome
is expected when the strategy is implemented? In evaluating effectiveness, one
simply asks, Did the strategy produce the expected outcome? To answer this
question requires demonstrating that the strategy and nothing else actually caused
the result. Researchers use a number of techniques for ruling out alternative
causes, including before and after tests, before and after tests with some form of
control group, and multiple regression analysis. These tests follow from scientific
logic and simply tell researchers how probable it is that the strategy actually
worked. But because these tests of effectiveness deal in probabilities rather than in
definitive answers, evaluation results are often hotly debated among researchers.
In this section, we discuss the constructive confrontation strategy and some of
the more generally used counseling strategies as well as the relevant research on
their effectiveness. Appendixes A and B provide more detail on these subjects.
Constructive Confrontation
The constructive confrontation strategy evolved as a technique for identifying
employed alcoholics and for counteracting the psychodynamics of alcoholism-
guilt, denial, rationalization, and manipulation (Donovan et al.,1977; Kellerman,
1970; Paredes, 1974; Pennoch and Poudrier, 1978; Trice, 1962a; Trice and
Roman, 1978). Most observers agree that unless these psychodynamics of denial
are overcome the likelihood of recovery from alcoholism is low and that the job-
performance standard of the constructive confrontation strategy offers one of the
best vehicles for attacking denial (Trice and Sonnenstuhl, 1990c). Because
alcoholism is a progressive disorder, it is difficult to distinguish in its early stages
from social and problem drinking. This difficulty is compounded by the conflicting
norms that surround drinking behavior in the United States. For example, some
groups believe that any use of alcohol is sinful; some believe that three or four
drinks a day is "normal11; still others believe that three or four drinks is a sign of
incipient alcoholism. In addition, alcoholism is characterized by denial. When
faced with evidence of their disruptive behavior, alcoholics deny that there is
anything wrong with their drinking behavior and always have a good excuse for it.
They have family problems; they were celebrating some occasion; they were carried
away, but it won't happen again; they became involved with the wrong crowd.
Alcoholics also manipulate the ambiguity surrounding drinking norms and exploit
stereotypes of alcoholics as skid-row bums. After all, they quickly point out, "I
really do not drink any more than everyone else. Besides, how could I have a
problem? I work like everyone else!" Other emotional and physical disorders also
are characterized by these psychodynamics (Schur, 1979), but they are particularly
pronounced in highly stigmatized health problems such as alcoholism, drug
addiction, and the psychoses. As a consequence, alcoholics and severely disturbed
people are exceptionally difficult to help.
Constructive confrontation solves the problem of identifying alcoholic
employees by adopting a pragmatic definition of alcoholism that is based on job
performance. Normal drinking does not unduly alter behavior and does not interfere
with effective and efficient work performance. Problem drinking both exceeds the
bounds of community definitions of appropriate behavior and impairs job
28
performance. Alcoholism is the physiological loss of control over drinking,
generally accompanied by the employee's inability to maintain acceptable levels of
job performance. These definitions assume that the employees who are merely
abusing alcohol can be motivated to change their behavior and those who have lost
control of their drinking will be motivated to seek treatment.
The constructive confrontation strategy is based on both academic and applied
research and basic industrial relations practices that suggest that most people can be
motivated to change if they receive appropriate feedback about their behavior.
Studies of Alcoholics Anonymous, for example, demonstrate that problem drinkers
who join AA have experienced intense reactions to their behavior from families,
friends, and employers, which made it difficult for the drinkers to continue their
denial. Other studies of AA (for example, Maxwell, 1960) and supervisors'
reactions to alcoholics suggest that problem drinking begins to affect job
performance adversely during the middle stages of the disease. Still other research
illustrates that many problem drinkers mature out of their disruptive behavior and
do not become alcoholics (Cahalan and Room, 1974; Clark and Cahalan, 1976;
Plant, 1979).
These findings from alcoholism studies parallel those from other studies. For
example, many people seek psychiatric treatment only after experiencing prolonged
and intense reactions to their bizarre behavior (Horwitz, 1977; Yarrow et al.,
1955). And many people who might otherwise become delinquents, embezzlers, or
marihuana smokers do not do so because the people around them do not
support-and often actively discourage-such behaviors (Cohen, 1966; Cressey,
1953; Becker, 1973). In turn, these alcoholism and sociological findings
complement the industrial relations practice of corrective discipline in which
supervisors react to employees' unacceptable performance with progressively
harsher sanctions (see Bacharach and Lawler, 1981; Black, 1970). Progressive
discipline is designed to induce problem employees to conform to accepted
performance standards and to discourage other employees from deviating from
those standards, but such discipline usually is not imposed until job performance is
seriously impaired. Research by Trice (1965) and others, however, has found that
supervisors are aware of the unsatisfactory performance of neurotic and psychotic
employees long before that stage.
For constructive confrontation to be effective, a supervisor may need to hold a
number of discussions with an employee whose performance is unacceptable. In
the confrontational part of the initial discussion, the employee is given the specifics
of unacceptable work performance and warned that continued unacceptable
performance is likely to lead to formal discipline. In the constructive part,
supervisors remind employees that practical assistance is available through the
EAP. Subsequent steps in the process depend on the response of the employee. If
performance improves, nothing happens; if unacceptable performance continues,
several more informal discussions may follow.
The constructive part of the informal discussions (1) expresses emotional
support and group concern about the employee's welfare, (2) emphasizes that
employment can be maintained if the employee performs better in the future, and (3)
suggests an alternative course of behaviors that the employee can take to regain
29
satisfactory work performance. The confrontational part of such discussions (1)
reiterates expectations of work performance, (2) reminds the employee that he or
she is not fulfilling these expectations and that formal sanctions will follow if
expectations continue to be violated, and (3) establishes some distance between the
employee and other employees who are meeting expectations, thus setting the stage
for further sanctions if needed.
Eventually, if the employee's performance still does not improve, a
supplementary tactic called crisis precipitation is added. At this stage the employee
is formally disciplined for continued poor performance-initially with a written
warning, then with a series of increasingly long temporary suspensions, and finally
with discharge. At all times up until discharge the employee is free to choose to go
to the EAP for help.
Controversy exists about whether supervisors will use the constructive
confrontation strategy. Donald A. Phillips et al. (1980) claim that troubled
employees beget troubled supervisors who must be counseled before they will use
the strategy. This concept has been incorporated into the writings of other EAP
practitioners (see, for example, Feinstein and Brown, 1982; Masi, 1982; Presnall,
1981). Empirical research, however, suggests that whether or not supervisors will
use constructive confrontation is associated primarily with age and experience.
Beyer and Trice (1978) as well as Googins and Kurtz (1981) have found that
young, inexperienced supervisors are less likely than older, experienced ones to use
it. Other research indicates that training programs that teach supervisors how to use
constructive confrontation as a general technique for managing marginal performers
increases familiarity with the policy and integrates supervisors into the formal and
informal networks of the organization, thus increasing the likelihood that they will
use the strategy (Belasco and Trice, 1969; Googins and Kurtz, 1979).
Likewise, a recent study by Sonnenstuhl and Trice (1989; see also Sonnenstuhl,
Trice, and Hathaway, 1990) found that relatively few supervisors are worried about
using the strategy with alcoholic or other troubled employees. Troubled supervisors
are young and inexperienced, occupy the lower rungs of the managerial ladder, and
believe that their own career advancement does not depend upon their coaching
employees to improve performance. In addition, being unfamiliar with the strategy
generally and lacking any specific training in its use, they implement it too late,
after employees' problems have become well developed and particularly difficult to
manage. Despite the severity of employees' problems, troubled supervisors
consulted few other people, further reinforcing their unfamiliarity with the strategy.
A number of studies on the use of the constructive confrontation model have
been completed since 1960. Each study has some methodological flaws, but when
considered as a whole, the consistency of the findings suggests that the model is
effective. Research by Trice and Beyer (1981) also indicates that the results
obtained in these studies are not due to selection biases. These studies, however,
have evaluated the effectiveness of constructive confrontation in industrial
alcoholism programs rather than in broadly based employee assistance programs.
Appendix A summarizes the studies and their reported findings.
30
Counseling
While constructive confrontation focuses on the work relationship between
supervisors and employees, counseling focuses on the therapeutic relationship
between counselors and employees. The latter focus emerged as a program theme
during the 1970s when trained counselors were becoming employed in EAPs and
naturally bringing with them their own ideas about managing programs and helping
troubled employees. They criticized earlier programs for lacking professional
personnel capable of doing clinical diagnosis, treatment, and referral (Wrich,
1980). In addition, some of them worried that constructive confrontation, by
coercing employees into treatment, would bring counselors into conflict with
professional codes of ethics that require them to be clients1 allies at all times (Shain
and Groeneveld, 1980). Some also argued that unacceptable job performance is a
late sign of employees' troubles and that improved performance does not mean the
underlying causes of problems have been resolved. To manage the ethical dilemma
and promote early identification of personal troubles, counselors encouraged
program emphasis on general educational efforts that would lead employees to refer
themselves to the EAP, where their problems could be professionally diagnosed
and appropriate treatment or referral recommendations made.
The counseling strategy rests on a framework of psychological therapy-or more
precisely a framework of many different psychotherapies. Psychotherapists
generally speak of three basic types of therapy: psychoanalytic or psychodynamic,
behavioral, and humanistic or phenomenological (see, for example, Bellack and
Hersen, 1980; Garfield, 1983; Goldenberg, 1983). These therapies have several
features in common. All are educational processes in which counselors try to teach
a client-who may be either an individual, a family group, or an organization-a
special way of viewing the problem behavior and lessons for changing it. Each
therapy, however, has its own conception of human nature, explanation for
abnormal development, strategy for changing behavior, and expected outcomes.
Each type has its adherents and critics. Many therapists, however, would simply
describe themselves as eclectic-picking and choosing between therapies according
to the needs of particular clients.
No one knows at present to what extent each type of psychotherapy is
represented in EAP counseling. But the influx of professionally trained counselors
into programs and their contributions to the EAP literature suggest that all types are
represented. For example, Manuso (1983) under the tide of Occupational Clinical
Psychology lists a wide range of approaches for treating troubled employees.
Similarly, Masi (1982) describes a variety of cases and treatment alternatives used
by industrial social workers. Whether employees are counseled in-house by the
EAP staff or are referred to out-of-house treatment agencies and practitioners, they
will be brought into contact with psychodynamic, behavioral, and humanistic
psychotherapists. The following brief summary of the differences in these
approaches may be helpful, although it is obviously an oversimplification of what
goes on in the clinical setting.
According to psychodynamic therapists, people progress from childhood to
adulthood through successive stages of psychological development. At each stage,
individuals unconsciously resolve questions about who they are and their
31
relationship to the larger world. Abnormal behaviors reflect unresolved conflicts in
earlier stages of development, and therapy consists of helping patients to resolve
them so that the patients can become psychologically mature.
Psychodynamic therapies are essentially "talking" cures in which therapists open
up patients1 pasts and their unconscious thoughts and feelings to conscious scrutiny
to promote self-understanding and growth. Attaining psychological maturity,
however, may require many years of treatment. Psychodynamic therapies have
been developed by Alfred Adler, Carl Jung, Karen Horney, Eric Fromm, and Erik
Erikson, but the best known is Sigmund Freud's psychoanalysis. Each of these
therapies has its own theory of psychological development and definition of
maturity. Evaluation research of psychodynamic therapies is relatively rare because
many of the concepts are impossible to measure.
Behaviorists reject psychodynamic therapies as being unscientific. According to
them, human nature is not predetermined but a product of social learning; that is,
people learn how to behave from others, and they behave in ways that are
rewarded. As a consequence, behavioral disorders stem from faulty learning and
therapy consists of teaching clients to extinguish old behavioral patterns and learn
new ones. Behaviorists, unlike psychodynamic therapists, believe that
unconscious conflicts and insights are irrelevant to treatment. They focus on
changing specific behaviors in targeted life situations (such as anxiety when
speaking before an audience), changing faulty thought patterns (such as "no one
likes me"), and teaching people to manage their lives better (such as being more
assertive). Behaviorists have developed a wide range of techniques for teaching
people to adopt new behaviors, but the best known of these is biofeedback.
Cognitive-behavioral techniques such as Ellis's rational-emotive therapy and
Meichenbaum's self-instructional training are currently popular with therapists.
Behavioral therapies are relatively short term, usually lasting from several sessions
to a year, and many of them have been rigorously evaluated.
Humanistic therapists reject psychodynamic therapies as too deterministic and
behavioral ones as too simplistic. Humanistic therapy is based on the proposition
that everyone is unique and is able to direct his or her own psychological growth.
People can become whatever they choose, and disordered behavior results from a
lack of self-esteem. Treatment focuses on making people more aware of who they
are, their values, how to accept themselves, and how to fulfill their potential.
Unlike psychodynamic therapies that focus on the past, humanistic therapies focus
on current experiences and feelings to foster psychological growth and self-esteem.
Examples of humanistic approaches are Carl Rogers's person-centered therapy,
Fritz Perls's gestalt therapy, William Glasser's reality therapy, and Janov's primal
therapy. Except for research on person-centered therapy, there are few evaluations
of humanistic psychotherapies.
According to Sol L. Garfield (1983) and William M. Pinsof (1981), therapists
are increasingly pursuing group and family therapies as alternatives to individual
psychotherapies. These approaches may prove to be more effective than individual
therapies because humans, as group members, are highly susceptible to group
forces, especially when brought to bear on a shared problem by a strong leader
operating within a belief system shared by the group. According to Horwitz
32
(1982), throughout most of the world, treatment for mental illness is conducted
within some form of group. EAP counselors are beginning to explore the use of
such techniques in their programs (see, for example, deLara, 1988). While the
logic is compelling, the methodological problems in evaluating group and family
therapies are difficult to overcome (Gurman and Kniskern, 1981). Thus, we are left
with much to learn about these promising approaches.
What can one make of the conflicting conclusions about the effectiveness of
various psychotherapies, and what do they mean for EAPs? Several observations
seem warranted. First, spontaneous remissions do occur, and two-thirds of most
neuroses can be expected to remit within two years of onset. Indeed, the findings
of a well-regarded psychotherapy study by R.B. Sloane et al. (1975) at the Harvard
Medical School suggest that 77 percent of employees with moderately severe
neuroses can be expected to recover or improve within four months with or without
treatment. Second, psychotherapy outcome research, especially for psychodynamic
and humanistic approaches, is still in its infancy. Until better outcome data are
available, individual EAP counselors undoubtedly will continue to deliver their own
brand of counseling to employees. By remaining flexible and observing what
works and what does not, they will develop a body of EAP counseling experiences
and literature. Finally, it is possible that the form of psychotherapy is less important
than the motivation of the employee, since psychotherapy outcome studies
consistently demonstrate that highly motivated clients do better in treatment than
less motivated ones.
The Case for Balance
33
employing more than 120,000 people in more than 50 facilities throughout the
United States. The company had had an alcoholism program since 1962, and in
1980 data were collected from a sustained random sample of 474 supervisors in 19
sample locations. In each facility, data were collected from two samples of
supervisors. Sample A (n=153) consisted of one-half of all supervisors who had
had a subordinate with a drinking problem and had referred that employee to the
company alcoholism program within three years prior to the study. Sample B
(n=321) consisted of one-tenth of all supervisors at each location, and they were
interviewed about how they had managed an employee who presented some
difficult behavior problem other than alcoholism during the same three-year period.
In face-to-face interviews, the researchers collected information on the employee's
job performance at the time the manager first realized that the employee had a
serious problem (Time 1); a measure of the employee's performance at the time of
the interview (Time 2); and information about what each manager said in
discussions with the employee, who was present at those discussions, what formal
discipline was taken with the employee, and the outcomes of the constructive
confrontation discussion. These data were analyzed by multiple regression. The
following questions and their answers highlight some of the findings in the study.
What factors predicted that problem drinkers would accept or
reject help? What supervisors said and how often they said it to problem
drinkers predicted whether problem drinkers would accept or reject help from the
program. Although supervisors used both constructive topics (for example,
availability of services) and confrontative topics (for example, possible disciplinary
actions), the constructive topics accounted for the problem drinkers accepting help,
and the more often supervisors constructively confronted them, the more likely
problem drinkers were to accept help. When supervisors used primarily
confrontative topics, problem drinkers were likely to refuse treatment or leave the
company. Who was present during the first discussion also appeared to affect
whether problem drinkers accepted or refused help. When employees' immediate
supervisors were absent and the supervisors' bosses were present, employees were
apt to refuse help. When medical department representatives were present,
employees were less likely to refuse help and more likely to accept treatment, but
they were also more likely to take early retirement or medical disability. When EAP
coordinators were present, employees were also likely to leave the company.
What factors predicted whether problem drinkers would improve
their job performance? At the time of the interview, supervisors indicated that
based on "traditional" performance criteria, 69.8 percent of the problem drinkers
improved their performance, another 9.3 percent improved with relapses, another
16.7 percent did not appear to change, and 4.2 percent seemed to deteriorate. A
second measure of job performance was calculated using the "best-worst"
technique, which asks supervisors to compare the performance of the alcoholic or
troubled employee with the performance of their best and worst employees (see
Beyer and Trice, 1984b, for a more detailed discussion). Using such comparisons
for the time the supervisor first realized the employee had a problem and at the time
of the interview, 75 percent were considered to have improved their performance,
11 percent remained the same, and 14 percent had gotten worse.
Four factors were related to improved performance, and four factors were related
34
to unimproved performance. Problem drinkers who had a somewhat higher
performance rating than other problem drinkers, who were older, who experienced
more confrontative topics in discussions, and who accepted treatment were more
likely to improve their job performance than those who did not have these
characteristics and experiences. Problem drinkers were unlikely to improve their
performance if the EAP coordinator was present at the first discussion, if they had
already opted to leave the company, if they had received a written warning, or if
they had been suspended from work without pay.
35
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
De Javotte, jamais il n’est question entre nous et, précisément,
l’application qu’il met à ne pas prononcer son nom le signale mieux
qu’une confidence.
J’ai envie de lui dire : « Tu exagères… Ne vois-tu pas que tu
découvres ton aventure par ta maladresse à la dissimuler ? Ta
discrétion excessive est une indiscrétion, car le silence est parfois
plus révélateur que la parole. »
Je me contente de sourire. Il se sent deviné et ne s’en affecte
pas. Il a fait son devoir de galant homme et n’a rien à se reprocher.
On se met à table. La joie qu’il contient veut se répandre, se
dépenser. Il taquine Olive :
— Olive, qu’est-ce que tu as fait aujourd’hui ? Raconte un peu…
Elle répond avec un regard agressif et un petit sourire fourbe :
— C’est à vous plutôt qu’il faudrait demander ça…