Internship Report

LAW 4206: Internship and Moot Court Exercise

Supervised By:
Professor Dr. Sayeda Siddika
Department of Law
Islamic University, Bangladesh.

Submitted By:
Shafein Ullas
Roll: 1806020
Registration No: 427
Session: 2018-19

Department of Law
Islamic University, Bangladesh
Date of Submission: 14th May 2024
 Table of Contents
Serial Description of Chapters Page No.
Number
1. Letter of Transmittal I
2. Certificate of Completion II
3. Acknowledgement III
4. Summary IV
Certificate by the Internship Supervisor
5. 5
(criminal side)
Certificate by the Internship Supervisor
6. 6
(civil side)
7. Certificate by the Internship Supervisor 7

8. Observation of Criminal Case 8

9. Observation of Civil Case 13

10. Attachment of Juristic Clinic 18

11. Client Interview - I 21
12. Client Interview - II 22
13. Law awareness Programme 24
14. Scheduled 26

15. Problems and Solutions 27

16. Achievements 28

17. Conclusion 29

18. Bibliography 30

19. Photo Gallery 31

 Letter of Transmittal

14th May 2024

Dr. Rehena Parvin

Professor,
Department of Law, Islamic University.

Subject: Submission of internship report.

Dear Sir,
Attached herewith is a report of Internship conducted at Internahip and Moot
Court Exercise which is a part of the LLB Program curriculum. It is great
achievement to work under your active supervision. I would like to take this
opportunity to thank you for the guidance and support you have provided me during
the course of this report. To prepare the report I have collected what I believe to be
most relevant information to make my report as concise and reliable as possible. I
have concentrated my best effort to achieve the objectives of the report and hope
that my endeavour will serve the purpose. The practical knowledge and experience
gathered during my report preparation will immeasurably help in my future
professional life.
Lastly, I remain extremely grateful to you for the permission you have accorded for
submission of this report.

Sincerely Yours,

Shafein Ullas

Roll: 1806020
Session: 2018-19
Department of Law, Islamic University.

i
 Certificate of Completion

This is to certify that Shafein Ullas , a student of Law of Islamic University, Roll:
1806020, has completed his three months internship under my supervision.

I hope that the knowledge he had acquired from the internship program would
greatly help him to adapt with the need and challenges he will face in his future
career. I wish his every success in his future endeavour.

------------------------------

Dr. Sayeda Siddika

Professor
Department of Law, Islamic University.

ii
 Acknowledgement

I have received a lot of helps, assistance and cooperation during my internship

period and during preparation of this report. I feel great pleasure acknowledging
their contribution with deep respect and gratitude. First and foremost, would like to
express my gratitude to my respected supervising teacher Professor Dr. Sayeda
Siddika, Professor, Department of Law of Islamic University, for his valuable
suggestions, encouragement and cooperation during the whole period of the work. I
also wish to express my deep gratitude to acknowledge Dr. Rehana Parvin,
Coordinator of Moot Court and Internship Programme , and Advocate Abu Taleb,
Jhenidah District Bar Association, for their support, guidance and patience.

I would like to express my deepest gratitude to my parents for their unwavering

support and encouragement throughout this journey. Their endless belief in my
abilities has been my driving force. Additionally, I extend my heartfelt appreciation
to my Team Members and friends for their constant motivation and invaluable
feedback. Their camaraderie made this experience even more fulfilling.

I am sincerely thankful for the opportunities, knowledge, and experiences gained

during this period, which will undoubtedly contribute to my future endeavors.

iii
 Summary

The purpose of this report is the fulfilment of Bachelor of Law program’s

requirement that involves three months internship program followed by preparation
of this report. The report is about the “Internship and Moot Court Summary” With a
view to establishing various aspects of this topic, the report has been divided into
some chapters. The Introductory part starts with the scope, objectives, and sources
of data collected, limitations.

The second part sheds my observation regarding two Litigation, one Criminal Case
and one Civil Case. It provides detailed analyses of each case, highlighting key
legal issues, precedents, and outcomes. Additionally, the chapter discusses
observations made during the litigation process, including client interviews,
activities within the juristic clinic, and participation in legal awareness programs.

The final chapter addresses various legal problems encountered during the
internship, accompanied by proposed solutions. It highlights personal achievements
and reflections on the overall experience. The conclusion summarizes key findings
and lessons learned. The report concludes with a bibliography citing relevant
sources and a photo gallery showcasing memorable moments from the internship.

iv
 Certificate by the Internship Supervisor
(Criminal Side)

This is to certify that Shafein Ullas , a student of Law of Islamic University, Roll: 1806020, is
known to me & complete his internship in criminal cases under my supervision. He was
physically present with me during the criminal case hearing on February 8, 2024, and based on
my supervision and observation, the report he prepared after the criminal hearing is authentic in
my knowledge.

I hope that the knowledge he had acquired from the internship program would greatly help him
to adapt with the need and challenges he will face in his future career. I wish his every success in
his future endeavour.

------------------------------

Md Abu Taleb
Senior Advocate
District and Session Judge Court, Jhenidah

5
 Certificate by the Internship Supervisor
(Civil Side)

This is to certify that Shafein Ullas , a student of Law of Islamic University, Roll: 1806020, is
known to me & complete his internship in civil cases under my supervision. He was physically
present with me during the Civil case hearing on February 1, 2024, and based on my supervision
and observation, the report he prepared after the criminal hearing is authentic in my knowledge.

I hope that the knowledge he had acquired from the internship program would greatly help him
to adapt with the need and challenges he will face in his future career. I wish his every success in
his future endeavour.

------------------------------

Md Abu Taleb
Senior Advocate
District and Session Judge Court, Jhenidah

6
 Certificate by the Internship Co-ordinator

This is to certify that Shafein Ullas , a student of Law of Islamic University, Roll: 1806020, is
known to me & completed an internship in civil suits and criminal cases from 25-01-2024 to 24-
03-2024. Throughout this period, the student was physically present in court daily. Based on my
observation and supervision, I can affirm the authenticity of the reports prepared by the student
following both civil and criminal hearings.

I hope that the knowledge he had acquired from the internship program would greatly help him
to adapt with the need and challenges he will face in his future career. I wish his every success in
his future endeavour.

------------------------------

Professor Dr. Rehena Parvin

Department of Law
Islamic University, Bangladesh

7
 Observation of Criminal Case

Daily internship duties:

1. Reviewing Case Files: Assigned to read at least one case file daily to understand file
maintenance procedures and record-keeping practices.
2. Observing Court Proceedings: Assigned to observe and learn from court arguments and
proceedings regularly.
3. Supporting Lawyers: Assisting lawyers in the office and during programs by attending
meetings, appointments, and offering necessary support as required
4. Reading Law-related Materials: Reading recommended law-related materials regularly to
enhance knowledge and understanding of the field.
5. Assisting Clients: Providing assistance to clients whenever possible, within the scope of
knowledge and abilities, and learning from these interactions to improve skills and
understanding.

Stage of my observation:
On the date 08-02-2024, this suit was presented in the ' Senior Judicial Magistrate Court, Coat
Chadpur, Jhenaidah. Through the stage of Argument.

The activity of the day:

In the investigation of the submission, the described sections 323 and 506 give a summon. After
that the defendants are presented in the court and take bail through by the court. Today 08-02-
2024 the day of testimony (evidence). However, the witness of the case did not attend the court.
So, the court gave another date for the trial 20-04-2024.

8
Date: 08-02-2024

Time: 11:00 am

Place: Judge Court, Jhenidah.

Parties:
Plaintiff:

1. Md. Laltu Biswas ,

Son of Late Abdul Goni Biswas.
1. Mahi Uddin
Son of Lakhatullah
2. Abu Zafor
Son of Sirazul Islam
3. Masud
Son of Mossarrof Sheikh

Defendant:

1. Md. Monwar Mondol

Son of Late Samsul Mondol
2. Md. Togor Ali Mondol
Son of Late Samsul Mondol
3. Md. Tota Mondol
Son of Late Samsul Mondol
4. Thandu Mondol
Son of Late Haydar Ali

Matter of Dispute:
In this case, the plaintiff alleges that defendants 1, 2, 3, and 4 attempted to kill him due to a
dispute over the purchase of a piece of land. The plaintiff further claims that the defendants
attempted to murder him using a stick and an iron rod, resulting in grievous bodily harm.

9
Facts Contradiction-1:
i. During the examination under Section 137 of The Evidence Act, 1872,
prosecution witness 1, Laltu Biswas, testified that defendant 1, Monwar,
inflicted the grievous hurt using a "Ramda".
ii. During the examination under Section 137 of The Evidence Act, 1872,
prosecution witness 2, Mahi Uddin, affirmed that defendant 1, Monwar,
caused the grievous hurt using a "Lohar Sabol".
iii. During the examination under Section 137 of The Evidence Act, 1872,
prosecution witness 3, Abu Zafor, asserted that defendant 1, Monwar, inflicted
the grievous hurt using "Lathi-Sota".
iv. During the examination under Section 137 of The Evidence Act, 1872,
prosecution witness 4, Masud, declared that defendant 1, Monwar, caused the
grievous hurt using a "Lohar Rod".

Facts Contradiction-2:

i. During his examination, prosecution witness 1, Laltu Biswas, stated that

during the occurrence, all other accused persons named ‘Togor, Tota, and
Thandu’ were indiscriminately beating him.
ii. During his examination, prosecution witness 2, Mahi Uddin, stated that all
other accused persons named Togor, Tota, and Thandu were not involved in
beating him during the occurrence.
iii. During his examination, prosecution witness 3, Abu Zafor, stated that he heard
that all other accused persons named Togor, Tota, and Thandu were
indiscriminately beating him during the occurrence.
iv. During his examination, prosecution witness 4, Masud, stated that all other
accused persons named Togor and Tota were indiscriminately beating him
during the occurrence.

Facts Contradiction-3:

10
 i. According to the medical report and plaint, in plaint it was shown that the
hurting was at 6:30 am where the medical report it was at 7:00 am. So, there
was a gap of 30 minutes as a matter of contradiction in the plaint

Facts Contradiction-4:
i. During his examination, prosecution witness 1, Laltu Biswas, testified that he
was bleeding at the time he was taken to the medical facility. He further stated
that there was blood on his body and inside the van that was transporting him
to the medical.
ii. During his examination, prosecution witness 2, Mahi Uddin, stated that the
blood was present on Laltu Biswas's T-shirt and on his body.
iii. During his examination, prosecution witness 3, Abu Zafor, stated that Laltu
Biswas was wearing a shirt that contained blood.

But the medical report showed that there were no sharp cutting and there is no such statement in
the medical report that shows that Laltu Biswas was bleeding during taking him to the medical.

Facts Contradiction-5:
i. In the plaint, the plaintiff stated that he was hurt in the elbow of left arm
where the medical report shows that it was not the elbow, it was the fracture
metacarpal bone of the left hand.

The Defense Lawyer’s Presentation:

1. The absence of neutral witnesses during the trial constitutes a violation of Section 157 of
the Evidence Act 1872, which emphasizes the importance of impartial testimony. In the
High Court Division, it was established in case "12 BCR (HC) 333" that neutral
witnesses is required to prove the fact.
2. The plaintiff failed to demonstrate sufficient evidence to establish the guilt of the defense
party beyond a reasonable doubt.
3. There were 5 contradictions among the witnesses which clearly showed that the accused
persons were not guilty. It was a fake case.

11
The Court’s Decision:
The learned court reached the decision that the plaintiff failed to provide sufficient grounds to
prove the guilt of the accused. Additionally, the contradictions among the witnesses further
weakened the case. As a result, the court dismissed the suit due to the lack of proper grounds and
inconsistencies in the evidence presented.

My observation:
Based on the facts presented and the testimony of witnesses, the court's decision to dismiss the
case appears to be fair and justified. The evidence and witness statements from the prosecution
failed to substantiate the allegations, indicating that the case may indeed have been fabricated or
lacked clarity. Therefore, the court's dismissal of the case seems appropriate given the lack of
credible grounds and the inconsistencies in the prosecution's arguments.

12
 Observation of Civil Case

Daily internship duties:

1. Reviewing Case Files: Assigned to read at least one case file daily to understand file
maintenance procedures and record-keeping practices.
2. Observing Court Proceedings: Assigned to observe and learn from court arguments and
proceedings regularly.
3. Supporting Lawyers: Assisting lawyers in the office and during programs by attending
meetings, appointments, and offering necessary support as required
4. Reading Law-related Materials: Reading recommended law-related materials regularly to
enhance knowledge and understanding of the field.
5. Assisting Clients: Providing assistance to clients whenever possible, within the scope of
knowledge and abilities, and learning from these interactions to improve skills and
understanding.

Stage of my observation:
On February 8, 2024, the suit was presented in the Vested Property Tribunal, Jhenaidah. I was
present during the trial proceedings. The activities of the day included engaging in arguments
and presenting evidence relevant to the case are as follows:

i. The plaintiff informed the court that no on-the-spot investigation was

conducted, presenting a list of factitious and illegally vested properties.
ii. The plaintiff also submitted that there were no witnesses in the department
regarding the departure of Vivek Ranjan to India.
iii. The plaintiff informed the court that no investigation report was available.
iv. The case is forwarded to the High Court for a final decision.
v. The court adjourned the proceedings, scheduling the next date of litigation for
May 22, 2024.

13
That is,

Govt of Bangladesh

Vs

Paresh Chandra Gharami and Others.

Vested Property:

When the government failed to establish the legal basis for including the suit property in the
census report of vested properties, and the plaintiffs presented evidence supporting their claim to
the property, the appellate court rendered a decree in accordance with the correct interpretation of
the law.

Court:
Vested Property Restitution Tribunal, Jhenaidah and Assistant Judge Court, Sailokupa.

Name of the Plaintiff and Defendant:

Md. Babur Ali Laskar Vs Deputy Commissioner, Jhenaidah.

Md. Babur Ali Laskar

C/o: Late. Md. Moijuddin Laskar

Village: Bashpu

Thana: Sailokupa

14
 Distrit: Jhenaidah

Vs

On behalf of The People's Republic of Bangladesh

Deputy Commissioner, Jhenaidah.

Under District :- Jhenaidah, Thana:- Sailokupa, 173 Rudah Mouza SA 532 and 534

no ledger (Kahatian) .

Application for release of land.

Details of the applicants complaint:

1.
District: Jhenaidah
Thana: Sailokupa
Mouza: 173 Rupdah
SA Records: SA 532 and 534
Ledger (Kahatian): 1060, 1059
Description: Stained land in SA records, currently occupied by Sree Bibek Ranjan
Joardar, Sree Gopi Ranjan Joardar, Sree Raghab Ranjan Joarder, Sree Abani Ranjan
Joarder, Sree Chittoranjan Joarder, Sree Ram Ranjan Joarder, Sree Dev Ranjan Joarder.
Abani Ranjan Joarder and Dev Ranjan Joarder, described as occupants, are deceased
before marriage. Bibek Ranjan, Raghab Ranjan, and Gopi Ranjan are currently in
possession of the land. Vivek Ranjan, Gopi Ranjan, and Raghab Ranjan have been

15
 cultivating the land since before 03/06/1986. A complaint is registered in Kabla No. 5359
regarding 16% of 1059 stains and 15% of 1060 stains. A total of 31% of the land was sold
to the applicant. The petitioners have filed complaints concerning stains 1059 and 1060,
including the land deposit receipt of the purchased land, which is known to the opponent
and publicly acknowledged. They have been occupying the land continuously until the
present day.

2. The land deposit complaint does not constitute vested property whatsoever. The listed
properties are entirely fictitious and unlawfully categorized as vested properties without
any on-ground investigation. None of the listed properties have a legal foundation and are
eligible for cancellation based on this fact. Additionally, in 1965, neither the petitioners
nor their predecessors visited India during the Pakistan-India war, nor did they acquire
Indian citizenship. They also did not participate in any actions against the Government of
Pakistan. Furthermore, the plaintiff lacks any valid documents pertaining to the disputed
property.

3. According to Schedule 'A' of the Sailokupa Thana Complaint land deposit gadget dated
April 30, 2012, it has been established that the petitioner has acquired legal and just
entitlement to apply for the disputed property.

4. By paying the court fee, the petitioner has submitted an application stating that the
complaint land deposit is not vested property. Therefore, it is requested that the land be
returned in favour of the applicant by issuing a decree in accordance with this request.

Scheduled Lands
Under District:- Jhenaidah, Thana:- Sailokupa, 173 Rudah Mouza's Land.

Vested Property Restitution Tribunal, Jhenaidah

Applicant Opponent

Babur Ali Laskar vs On behalf of The People's Republic Of

16
 Bangladesh Deputy Commissioner, Jhenaidah

Opponents answer:

1. The petitioner party has no legal right to make this application.

2. This application is rendered obsolete due to its vague and indefinite nature.
3. The petition is becoming obsolete due to the petitioner's failure to adhere to acceptable
conduct and obstruction of tacit consent.
4. All statements made by the petitioner in this petition have been denied by the respondent.
The petitioner will be required to substantiate each claim made in their petition.
5. The real story is that the land described in the application schedule falls under District:
Jhenaidah, Thana: Sailokupa, in Mouza 173 Rupdah, with SA Record No. 532. The land
was previously owned by Bibek Ranjan Joarder and others as recorded in the SA records.
However, during the Pak-India war in 1965, the aforementioned SA-recorded owners
migrated to India and obtained Indian citizenship. They did not return to East Pakistan
(Bangladesh) thereafter. Consequently, the Government of Pakistan classified their
property as enemy property. Subsequently, under Schedule VP 74/Soil?77, the
Bangladesh government created a case file and brought the land under its control. The
land was settled and published under 'A' Schedule Gadget 966 by the Government of
Bangladesh. The applicant has no rightful claim to the disputed land. The petitioners'
attempt to misappropriate valuable government property through forged documents and
false claims is evident. Given these circumstances, the application is recommended for
rejection.

17
 Attachment of Juristic Clinic

Place: Juristic Clinic, Department Of Law, Islamic University, Kushtia

Experience:
Our experience at the Juristic Clinic was incredibly rewarding. We were thrilled to have the
opportunity to work there, and all of our team members actively participated in various activities.
From visiting different departments of our university to local markets and stalls, we worked
tirelessly to spread awareness about the legal aid program offered by the clinic. As a result of our
efforts, we witnessed an influx of clients seeking legal opinions and solutions for their legal
problems. We found immense satisfaction in being able to share our knowledge and expertise
with them, reflecting our enthusiasm for the legal aid program and our dedication to making a
positive impact within our community.

18
Image:

19
Throughout our interactions, we offered guidance and advice on a range of legal matters,
including but not limited to:

 The Code of Civil Procedure,1908

 The Code of Criminal Procedure,1898
 The Village Courts Act,2006
 Muslim Laws
 Alternative Dispute Resulation
 The Evidence Act,1872
 Income Tax Ordinance,1984
 Law of Equty
 Registration ACT,1908
 The Transfer of Property Act,1882
 Labour Laws,2006
 The Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961
 Money Loan Courts Act, 2003
 The Prevention Money Laundering Act, 2012
 The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
 The Power of Attorney Act, 2012
 The Penal Code, 1860
 The Specific Relief Act, 1877
 The Special Powers Act, 1974
 The Limitations Act, 1908
 Prevention Against Women & Children Repression Act, 2000
 The Arms Act, 1878
 Law of Banking
 Law of Contract, 1872
 Constitutional Laws

20
  Hindu Laws
 Environmental Laws
 International Law
 The Legal Aid Act, 2003

Indeed, the experience of participating in the Juristic Clinic has greatly enriched our knowledge
to a significant extent.

Client Interview - 1

Client Name: Amina, Ex wife of Abdul Majid, Village: Shailakupa Thana: Shailakupa District:
Jhenaidah

Clients Problem: Amina came to our Juristic Clinic seeking advice regarding maintenance and
dower entitlement from her husband following their divorce. During the client interview, Amina,
who got divorced a month ago, revealed her ex-husband hasn't provided any maintenance
support. She's facing additional challenges as she lives with her two-year-old child.

My Advice: During our client interview session, I empathetically listened to Amina's concerns
regarding her entitlement to maintenance and dower after the dissolution of her marriage. I
explained to her the provisions of Muslim family law pertaining to maintenance and dower
rights. Based on her specific circumstances, I advised Amina on the legal procedures she could
pursue to claim her entitlements. I also provided her with practical guidance on the
documentation required and the steps she should take to assert her rights effectively in
accordance with the Muslim Family Law Ordinance 1961 and Muslim Family Law Court 2023.

21
Additionally, I reassured Amina that our Juristic Clinic would provide ongoing support and
assistance throughout the process.

Client Interview - 2

Client Name: Nasrin Jahan

Age: 27 years old

Problem:

On January 7, 2024, shortly after evening prayers, Nasrin Jahan, aged 27, heard her husband
calling her to come down to the street. As she reached the door, however, he stood flanked by
two men, blocking her exit. Upon her husband's command, his companions doused her with
nitric acid. "My husband stood watching as my dress fell straight off and my necklace and
earrings melted into my skin," recounted Marufa Khatun. Following four surgeries and nearly
four months of treatment at Dhaka Medical College Hospital, Nasrin lost both her left ear and
left eye. "He was trying to kill me," she disclosed. Nasrin Jahan expressed her reluctance to
report her husband's violence during their 12-year marriage due to a lack of trust in the police's
ability to respond appropriately. She feared that reporting the abuse would only anger her
husband further and put her at greater risk, as she lacked support. This lack of trust in the police
is sadly common and exacerbated by the limited availability of shelter services in Bangladesh,
leaving many survivors with no means of escape from abuse.

22
My Advice: The government of Bangladesh has enacted significant legislation to address and
prevent various forms of violence against women and girls. By accessing these resources, you
can receive legal guidance and support to navigate your situation and seek justice for the harm
you've endured. Additionally, there are many organizations and legal entities that specialize in
supporting survivors of gender-based violence which can provide access to medical,
psychological, and social services to help you heal and rebuild your life. It's essential to know
that you are not alone, and there are systems in place to support and protect you.

Acid Legislation : The Acid Offense Prevention Act and Acid Control Act, enacted in 2002,
represent significant milestones in Bangladesh's legal framework for combating acid violence.
These laws not only establish regulations governing the sale, distribution, and use of acid but
also hold perpetrators of acid attacks accountable and provide provisions for social services.
Additionally, supplementary rules implemented in 2004 and 2008 further delineate regulatory
details and outline government commitments to offer medical, legal, and rehabilitation support to
survivors.

Under the Prevention Act, perpetrators of acid violence face severe penalties, including
imprisonment ranging from three years to life, and in certain cases, the death penalty. Notably,
the legislation prioritizes expeditious trials to ensure timely justice. Section 14 designates acid
violence offenses as cognizable, enabling law enforcement to initiate investigations promptly
without court authorization. Furthermore, Section 11 mandates that investigations must conclude
within 30 days of a complaint being filed. Once a case reaches trial, courts are compelled to
conduct proceedings daily until its conclusion, ensuring swift resolution within 90 days of receipt
by the court.

In instances where the accused evades apprehension, a common occurrence in acid attack cases,
the court retains the authority to proceed with the trial in the perpetrator's absence if there is no
immediate prospect of arrest. These provisions underscore the government's commitment to
combating acid violence and ensuring justice for survivors through fair and expedited legal
proceedings.

Punishment: The Acid Offense Prevention Act of 2002 is designed to combat acid violence
through stringent penalties, ranging from three to fifteen years of imprisonment. Depending on
the severity of the offense, perpetrators may face life imprisonment or even the death penalty.
The severity of punishment is determined by the extent of harm inflicted on the victim, with
more severe penalties imposed for actions resulting in death, loss of vision, loss of hearing, or
disfigurement of specific body parts such as the face, breasts, or sexual organs. Those found
guilty of causing bodily damage or disfigurement face a minimum of seven years of rigorous
imprisonment.

23
Additionally, individuals attempting to throw acid, causing no harm or injury, may be sentenced
to a minimum of three years of rigorous imprisonment and fined up to fifty thousand taka.
Furthermore, individuals aiding or abetting in the commission of acid violence are subject to the
same punishment as the primary perpetrator.

The Acid Control Act of 2002 complements the Acid Offense Prevention Act by regulating the
import, production, transportation, hoarding, sale, and use of acid. This act also mandates the
provision of medical treatment, rehabilitation, and legal assistance to victims of acid violence.
Violators of the Acid Control Act face imprisonment for three to ten years and fines of up to fifty
thousand taka for engaging in unlicensed production, importation, transport, storage, sale, or use
of acid.

Legal Awareness Program

The Latin phrase "ignorantia juris non excusat," which means ignorance of the law is no excuse,
underscores the importance of legal awareness. In Bangladesh, legal awareness, or legal
consciousness, is crucial for empowering individuals to understand and assert their rights
effectively. However, the reality is stark: approximately 70% of the population residing in rural
areas is illiterate, and even among the literate population, there is a significant lack of awareness
regarding their legal rights.

This lack of awareness disproportionately affects marginalized communities, leading to the

denial of fundamental rights and the inability to access government welfare schemes and
programs. The complexity of the legal system further exacerbates the situation, with many
Bangladeshis finding it difficult to navigate the intricate maze of laws and procedures.

24
Barriers such as inaccessible legal information, language differences, and limited digital literacy
contribute to the pervasive lack of legal awareness. As a result, many individuals remain
vulnerable to legal exploitation and are unable to exercise their fundamental rights effectively.

To address these challenges, concerted efforts are needed to enhance legal awareness across
Bangladesh. This includes:

1. Education Initiatives: Integrate legal education into school curricula and community
programs.
2. Public Awareness Campaigns: Launch comprehensive campaigns using various mediums
to disseminate legal information.
3. Accessible Legal Resources: Establish easily accessible legal resource centers in
communities.
4. Legal Aid Services: Expand legal aid services, especially in rural areas, for free or low-
cost assistance.
5. Community Outreach Programs: Conduct regular legal awareness workshops and clinics
in collaboration with local organizations.
6. Cultural and Linguistic Sensitivity: Develop materials and programs tailored to local
languages and cultural contexts.
7. Technology Integration: Utilize technology for delivering legal information and virtual
consultations.
8. Capacity Building: Provide training programs for legal professionals and community
leaders.
9. Partnerships and Collaboration: Forge partnerships with government agencies and civil
society organizations.
10. Evaluation and Feedback Mechanisms: Establish mechanisms to monitor and evaluate
program effectiveness regularly.

By promoting legal awareness, Bangladesh can empower its citizens to stand up against
injustice, protect their rights, and contribute to the creation of a more equitable and just society.
It is imperative that stakeholders across sectors collaborate to ensure that legal awareness
becomes a cornerstone of Bangladesh's socio-legal landscape, enabling every individual to
exercise their rights with confidence and dignity.

25
In addition to the aforementioned strategies, it is worth highlighting the proactive initiatives
taken by organizations such as our juristic clinic. On March 19, 2024, our team members
conducted a legal awareness program focusing on the Road Transport Act 2018. This event
aimed to educate both the general public and students about the provisions and implications of
this act, thereby enhancing their legal awareness.

Through interactive sessions, workshops, and informational materials, participants gained

valuable insights into their rights and responsibilities under the Road Transport Act 2018. By
directly engaging with community members and students, our initiative contributed to bridging
the gap in legal awareness and empowering individuals to navigate the complexities of the
transportation laws more effectively.

Such grassroots efforts play a crucial role in promoting legal awareness and fostering a culture of
legal consciousness within society. Moving forward, it is essential to continue organizing similar
programs and collaborating with stakeholders to ensure that legal knowledge reaches every
corner of Bangladesh, enabling individuals to assert their rights and participate meaningfully in
the legal system.

Scheduled

During the entirety of the internship program, spanning from January 25th to March 24th, 2024, I
actively participated and was fully engaged. My attendance included regular visits to the court,
as well as participation in The Juristic Clinic and Legal Awareness program. I am exceedingly
delighted to have had the opportunity to partake in all these enriching experiences.

26
 Problems and Solutions

Problem:

1. Overwhelming workload leading to difficulty in task management and completion within

deadlines.
2. Communication barriers with Teammates, hindering effective collaboration and
workflow.
27
 3. Adapting to unfamiliar procedures and navigating complex legal concepts.
4. Lack of clear guidance or mentorship in certain tasks or projects.
5. Balancing internship responsibilities with academic commitments or personal
obligations.

Solutions:

1. Implement effective time management strategies, such as prioritizing tasks, breaking

down tasks into manageable chunks, and setting realistic goals.
2. Foster open communication channels with colleagues, seek clarification when needed,
and utilize various communication tools and platforms.
3. Dedicate extra time to studying relevant materials, seek guidance from mentors or
supervisors, and actively participate in training sessions or workshops.
4. Proactively seek out mentors or supervisors for guidance and clarification on tasks or
projects, and ask for feedback to improve performance.
5. Maintain a healthy work-life balance by setting boundaries, scheduling regular breaks,
and seeking support from peers or mentors when needed.

Achievements

 Acquired practical knowledge about court proceedings and procedures, enhancing

understanding of legal frameworks and practices.
 Established strong relationships with members of the BAR, advocates, and judges of the
Jhenidah Judge Court, fostering networking opportunities and professional connections.

28
 Expanded legal knowledge through exposure to real-world cases and interactions with legal
professionals, enhancing comprehension of legal principles and practices.
 Attained a clear understanding of court proceedings, including trial processes, case
management, and legal documentation.
 Developed a comprehensive grasp of court proceedings, contributing to improved analytical
skills and critical thinking abilities.
 Gained valuable experience in teamwork, collaborating effectively with colleagues, legal
professionals, and court personnel to achieve common goals and objectives.

Conclusion

In conclusion, my internship experience has been invaluable in providing me with practical

insights into the legal field. Through the examination of two distinct cases, one civil and one
criminal, I gained a deeper understanding of legal procedures and case management.
Additionally, actively participating in juristic clinic activities and legal awareness programs has

29
underscored the importance of community engagement and access to justice. These experiences
have not only enriched my academic knowledge but also honed my practical skills in legal
research, analysis, and client interaction. Moving forward, I am eager to apply the lessons
learned and contribute meaningfully to the legal profession. I am grateful for the opportunities
afforded to me during this internship and look forward to continuing my journey in the legal field
with newfound confidence and competence.

Bibliography

 Wikipedia
 Information from Jhenidah Bar Association
 Information from Jhenidah district court Legal Aid office
 Statement of secretary of Jhenidah BAR
 Encyclopedia

30
 http://bdlaws.minlaw.gov.bd/

Photo Gallery

31
32
33
34
35
36