Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Nurses
Nurses
net/publication/380492155
CITATIONS READS
0 12
2 authors, including:
Sridevi Sivakami
Avinashilingam University
38 PUBLICATIONS 36 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Sridevi Sivakami on 11 May 2024.
VOLUME -I
Editors
Dr. M. V. Alli
Lt.Dr. S. Ithayamalar
Dr. L. Jayaprada
Dr. R. Sakthi
Copyright
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or
transmitted, in any form or by any means, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise,
without prior written permission of the Editor.
Publisher
Thanuj International Publishers,
Tamil Nadu, India
CONTENTS
S. No. Title with Author(s) Page No.
Abstract
Nursing stands one of the professions dominated by women who are the key for
sustainable development in the family. Global nurse’s statistics are 27 million. In India and
Odisha it is 33.42 lakhs and 82,189 thousands respectively. Nurses are educated to take the
patients' quality of life and healthcare into account but they rarely do so. Inaccessibility to
health amenities and ignorance of wellbeing practices of general public are the challenges for
Odisha nurses. Present study was conducted among the selected 126 registered nurses working
in a multispecialty hospital in western Odisha. In the present study the demographic profile of
nurses revealed that 80 of them are below the age group of 30 years. General Nursing and
Midwifery was the basic qualifications of 96 nurses. Among them 74 nurses were unmarried.
Most of them were working in general wards (102). Nurses with less than 3years’ experience and
more than one experience were 64. Nurses with 4 to 10 years’ experience were 22, whereas
nurses with more than 11 years’ experience were 40. The working hours were more than 48
hours for 90 nurses nevertheless 72 have their monthly income less than Rs.15000. Assessment of
quality of life shows that physical domain obtained the highest score 15 and the social domain
obtained the lowest score 5. The psychological and environmental domains were 10 and 13
respectively. In the transformed score with the range of 4-20 also physical domain scored 58
whereas the social domain scored 20. The psychological and environmental raw scores were
37.2 and 54.4 respectively. The present study findings show that nurses participated in this
studies are satisfied with their physical domains of quality of life whereas it was very low in
social domain. In terms of rating of quality of life, 84 of them have rated that their quality of life
is good and 36 have rated it is very good. Analysis of their satisfaction on health revealed that
79 were satisfied with their health and 35 were very satisfied with their health.
Keywords: Nurses, Quality of life, Physical, Psychological, Social & environmental domains.
92
Introduction
Women are the key person for the sustainable development of a family. At present,
womenfolk of every ethnic group are represented in the labour force. However, this means that
women who work both professionally and mostly at home now have higher obligations than they
did in the past. These dual responsibilities can increase stress, jeopardize physical and mental
health, cause burnout, and reduce productivity at work. Their quality of life is compromised.
Nursing is one of the professions dominated by women. Approximately the global nurse’s
statistics are 27 million (WHO, 2022). According to Medical Dialogue (2022) India has 33.42
lakh registered nurses. A latest study by NITI Aayog has exposed that Odisha falls short of
public health standard norms in hospital staffing (New Indian Express October2nd 2021). In
Odisha 82,189 nurses are working in the health care industry. The ratio of staff nurses in
proportion to norms is 0.5 with the State ranked 16 th (Central Bureau of Health Intelligence,
2020). Maximum nurse leaders from place to place in the world is concerned about the ideal
nurse to patient ratio. It affords benefits for both nurses and patients, which is crucial for the
health and safety of the care given to patients as well as the nurses' living conditions. In
association to their aims, anticipations, principles and uncertainties, societies ‘imitations of their
place in life within the framework of the values and cultural structures in which they live are
referred to as their quality of life. Nurses are taught to think about the patient's quality of life and
care, but they almost ever think about their personal; they hardly ever deliberate that they or
others working in the occupation might require care.
Quality of life (QOL) is a broad notion that attempts to describe a person's sense of
happiness. It describes the extent to which a person is capable of engaging in or appreciating life
events, as well as being healthy, happy and comfortable. It encompasses all aspects of human
lifestyle at that particular time, both good and bad.
It differs from person to person. Various factors determine quality of life of peoples. One
person may define quality of life according to physical possession or satisfaction with life,
another person may define it in terms of capabilities and values e.g., having the ability to live a
good life in terms of emotional and physical well-being, living with good moral values.
(Britannica., 2022)
A differently abled person may report a high quality of life accepting his disability,
whereas a healthy person who experienced some acute crisis in his life may report a low quality
93
of life. Therefore, description of quality of life is highly subjective in nature. Within the arena
of health care, quality of life is viewed as multidimensional, encompassing physical,
psychological, social and environmental well-being. (Crispin Jenkinson., 2022).
Many studies have been conducted on quality of life of many categories of people
including health care industry workers. Amit Kumar (2018) conducted a study on 100 doctors
and 100 nurses with the aim of assessing their quality of life and the psychological factors
influencing it and identified that the complete insight of quality of life was normal, the overall
stress level of health-care workers was moderately elevated and majority showed average coping
resources.
Quality of life was lower in older nurses who were working rotated shift and those having
higher years of experience(Huda et al 2020) which is in line with studies that found a significant
association between quality of life and age (Albuquerque et al., 2019) and years of experience.
94
(The Times of India, 2020). Ultimately all these factors are the challenges for nursing fraternity in
Odisha.
From the existing literature it has been revealed that although there have been a few
researches on quality of life nurses in India and abroad, yet there is a lack of research conducted
on the working nurses’ quality of life in hospitals in Odisha, and the present research emphases
on the Quality of Life of nurses in Odisha hospitals.
Methodology
Selection of samples: A descriptive study was conducted among 126 registered female nurses
who were involved with direct patient care in all the departments of selected Odisha hospitals.
The age group was between 21 and 50 years with the experience of more than one year. Male
nurses and nurses involved in teaching were not included.
95
respondents were requested to sign an informed consent form. Additionally, they were told that
they might leave the study at any time by telling the researcher.
Analysis of Data
SPSS was used to examine the acquired data once they had been coded and summarized
in a master sheet.
The sample characteristics are described in terms of frequency and percentage n=126
Particulars N=126 %
Age (years)
21-30 80 63.5
31-40 22 17.5
41-50 24 19.0
Professional qualification
General Nursing and Midwifery 96 76.2
Undergraduate 30 23.8
Marital status
Un married 74 58.7
Married 52 41.3
96
Area of current work
General Wards 102 81.0
Admin 4 3.2
ICU 18 14.3
Emergency/Trauma care 2 1.6
Experience
1-3 years 64 50.8
4-6 Years 18 14.3
7-9 years 4 3.2
10-12 years 12 9.5
13 years and above 28 22.2
Working Hours/week
48 hours 20 15.9
More than 48 hours 94 74.6
Less than 48 hours 12 9.5
Monthly Income (Rs)
10000 - 15000 72 57.1
15001 - 20000 26 20.6
20001 - 25000 28 22.2
In the present study the demographic profile of nurses revealed that 80 of them are below
the age group of 30 years. General Nursing and Midwifery was the basic qualifications for the 96
nurses among them 74 nurses were unmarried. Most of them were working in general wards
(102). Nurses with less than 3years’ experience and more than one experience were 64. Nurses
with 4 to 10 years’ experience were 22, whereas nurses with more than 11 years’ experience
were 40. The working hours were more than 48 hours for 90 nurses nevertheless majority of
them (72) had their monthly income less than Rs.15000.
97
Table 2-Domains of Quality of life of nurses
Domains of QOL Mean±SD Transformed Score (4-20) * Transformed Score(0-100) *
Social 5±2.7 23 83
*WHO BREF scale. In accordance with the WHOQOL-100, its first transformation method
transforms results to a range between 4 and 20. The second transformation technique scales
domain scores from 0 to 100.
Assessment of quality of life shows that physical domain obtained the highest score 15
and the social domain obtained the lowest score 5. The psychological and environmental
domains were 10 and 13respectively. In the transformed score with the range of 4-20 also
physical domain scored 58 whereas the social domain scored 20. The psychological and
environmental raw scores were 37.2 and 54.4 respectively. The present study findings show that
nurses participated in this studies are satisfied with their physical domains of quality of life
which is supported by the study done by Rajeshwari Sathyananda and Usha Manjunath (2017) on
70 health workers working in primary health care centers in Karnataka found out that women
health care workers were more satisfied with physical health domain then the psychological,
social and environmental domains. Study conducted by Ergun (2016) reveled with present study
where a physical domain was scored high, whereas it is in disagreement with the study of
Orszudak (2022) who studied quality of life and working behaviours of 312 nurses and found out
that nurse’s quality of life in physical domain was the lowest. Nurses in this study have scored
less in social domains and not satisfied with their personal relationship, sex life and support from
their friends and family. The same findings were noted by Huda (2020), who studied quality of
life of 119 nurses in Lebanon found out nurses have score the lowest score in social domain
which supports the present study.
98
Table 3- Overall rating of quality of life and health satisfaction among the selected nurses
Rating the Quality of Life Neither poor nor good Good Very good
6 84 36
Level of Satisfaction on Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied Satisfied Very satisfied
health 12 79 35
In terms of rating of quality of life, 84 of them have rated that their quality of life is good
and 36 have rated it is very good. Analysis of their satisfaction on health revealed that 79 were
satisfied with their health and 35 were very satisfied with their health.
Two tailed correlation was used to study the associations between demographic variables
and four domains of QOL. Correlation was significant between Physical domain and age, marital
status, years of experience and monthly income. In Psychological domain the level of
significance was noted at 0.01levels with the years of experience, marital status, professional
qualification, years of experience and monthly income. Social domain was significantly
correlated with age, marital status, qualification, experience and monthly income. Environmental
domain was correlating significantly with age, marital status, experience and monthly income.
Overall age, marital status, professional qualification, experience and monthly income are
significantly correlating with all four domains.
99
Conclusion
It is very important to know the QOL and the level satisfaction on health to meet the
challenges of the health care professional in the health care delivery system, the present study
revealed that the nurses who took part in these assessments are content with their physical
spheres of quality of life and yet not in their social spheres. They are content with their health
and feel good about their overall quality of life.
References
1. Access Health international.,2016., https://accessh.org/health-system-odisha-challenges-
opportunities-investment-improvement/
2. Albuquerque, G. P. M. D. , Abrão, F. M. D. S. , Almeida, A. M. D. , Alves, D. L. R. ,
Andrade, P. D. O. N. , & Costa, A. M. D. (2019). Quality of life in the climacteric of
nurses working in primary care. Revista Brasileira De Enfermagem, 72, 154–161,
10.1590/0034-7167-2018-0306 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar].
3. Central bureau of health intelligence, 2020, https://www.ceicdata.com/en/india/health-
human-resources-number-of-nurses-registered/number-of-nurses-registered-odisha-
general-nursing-and-midwives.
4. Ergun FS, Oran NT, and Bender CM. Quality of life of oncology nurses. Cancer Nursing.
2016 May-Jun; 28(3):193-9.
5. Medical Dialogue., 2022., https://medicaldialogues.in/nursing/news/3341-lacs-nurses-
registered-in-india-govt-tells-rajya-sabha-91031
6. The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHO QOL), 2012., Position
paper from the World Health Organization. SocSciMed ; 41:1403-9.
7. The Times Of India., 2020., Odisha: Contractual NHM nurses allege government apathy
amid ..https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/bhubaneswar/odisha-contractual-nhm-
nurses-allege-government-apathy-amidst-fight-
againstcoronavirusarticleshow/75542199.cms
8. WHO 2022., Nursing and Midwifery., https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-
heets/detail/nursing-and-Midwifery.
9. https://www.newindianexpress.com/states/odisha/2021/oct/02/odisha-falls-short-of-public-
health-standard-norms-in-hospital-staffing-niti-aayog-report-2366669.html.
100
10. Amit Kumar, Pookala Shivaram Bhat, Sumalatha Ryali.,2018., Study of quality of life
among health workers and psychosocial factors influencing it., Volume : 27 | Issue : 1
Page : 96-102.
11. Rajeshwari Bangalore Sathyananda, Usha Manjunath.,2017., Assessment of quality of
life among the health workers of primary health centers managed by a nongovernment
organization in Karnataka, India: A case study., Volume : 6 | Issue : 4 | Page : 240-244.
12. Huda A. Anshasi, Mirna Fawaz, Sura Alhalalmeh, Wafa Qasem Ahmad, and Ahmad
Tassi.,2020., Nurses' stressors and their quality of life: A study on nurses caring for older
patients.,Vol: 7(6): 1698–1706.
13. Natalia Orszulak, KlaudiaKubiak, Adam Kowal, Michał Czapla and Izabella
Uchmanowicz.,2022., Nurses’ Quality of Life and Healthy Behaviors.,19(19),
12927; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912927
14. Crispin Jenkinson., 2022., https://www.britannica.com/topic/quality-of-life
101