Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Full Ebook of Advances in Insect Rearing For Research and Pest Management Thomas E Anderson Online PDF All Chapter
Full Ebook of Advances in Insect Rearing For Research and Pest Management Thomas E Anderson Online PDF All Chapter
Full Ebook of Advances in Insect Rearing For Research and Pest Management Thomas E Anderson Online PDF All Chapter
https://ebookmeta.com/product/advances-in-diabetes-research-and-
management-1st-edition-rana-noor-editor/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/rnai-strategies-for-pest-
management-methods-and-protocols-1st-edition-luis-maria-
vaschetto/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/research-in-personnel-and-human-
resources-management-1st-edition-john-e-baur/
Advances in Postharvest Management of Cereals and
Grains 1st Edition Dirk E. Maier (Editor)
https://ebookmeta.com/product/advances-in-postharvest-management-
of-cereals-and-grains-1st-edition-dirk-e-maier-editor/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/panzer-iv-thomas-anderson/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/implications-and-impacts-of-
esports-on-business-and-society-emerging-research-and-
opportunities-advances-in-e-business-research-1st-edition-norm-
oreilly/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/methodological-issues-in-
management-research-advances-challenges-and-the-way-ahead-1st-
edition-rabi-n-subudhi/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/careers-in-nonprofit-management-
institute-for-career-research/
Advances in Insect Rearing for
Research and Pest Management
Advances in Insect Rearing for
Research and Pest Management
Edited By<br/>
<br/>
Thomas E. Anderson
and Norman C. Leppla <br/>
Technical Editors<br/>
Teri Houck
<br/>
and Tom Knecht
First published 1992 by Westview Press, Inc.
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in
any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter
invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or
retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers.
Notice:
Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used
only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe.
DOI: 10.120119780429043246
DEDICATED TO
André Van der Vloedt, second from right, demonstrating his tsetse fly trap
near Lake Victoria in Kenya. His colleagues were part of a review team
assembled at the International Center of Insect Physiology and Ecology in
1989 to review the insect rearing program and evaluate its role in
developing new pest suppression technologies.
Contents
Preface xi
Acknowledgments xiii
PART ONE
Historical Perspective
1 Insect
The Rearing Group and the Development of
Insect Rearing as a Profession , W. A. Dickerson
and N. C. Leppla3
PART TWO
Insect Rearing Research
Molecular
2 Genetic Mechanisms for Sex-Specific
Selection , Alfred M. Handler 11
4
Development of Artificial Diets for Entomophagous
Insectsby Understanding Their Nutrition and Digestion ,
I. G. Yazlovetsky 41
Using
6 a Systematic Approach to Develop Artificial Diets
for Predators , Allen C. Cohen 77
7
Feeding and Dietary Requirements of the Tephritid
Fruit Flies , George J. Tsiropoulos 93
8 Flea Rearing in Vivo and in Vitro for Basic and Applied
Research , Nancy C. Hinkle, Philip G. Koehler,
and Richard S. Patterson 119
PART THREE
Insect Rearing Support
PART FIVE
Insect Rearing in the Marketplace
art of insect rearing. The importance of this subject is growing, both in basic
research and the applied field of pest management. The concern of the public
for alternative, environmentally sound methods of controlling insect pests has
produced growing support for management programs employing the release of
beneficial species. Moreover, the burgeoning field of biotechnology is now
making possible programs that wereunimaginable a few short years ago.
Professional entomologists in government, academia, and private industry
who deal daily with the rearing of insects for biological testing or release in pest
management programs are an obvious audience for this text. There are,
however, other equally important audiences. Researchers in other disciplines
have found that insects are relatively easy-to-rear, effective models for basic
studies on subjects as diverse as artificial intelligence and space medicine.
Students reading this text will gain an appreciation of the importance of insect
rearing to a broad diversity of research programs. Administrators responsible
for program funding and development, and nonbiologists responsible for the
design and construction of laboratory facilities, will gain an appreciation of the
manpower and resource requirements necessary for successful, efficient insect
rearing. Operators of small businesses will benefit from learning of the
experiences of others who have successfully taken insect rearing techniques from
the laboratory to the marketplace and who sell insects for research and pest
control in agriculture and forestry.
This book originated from a symposium of the same name held at the 1988
XVIII International Congress of Entomology in Vancouver, Canada. The
symposium provided an excellent international forum for the discussion of many
new advances in the field of insect rearing, but certain areas could not be
adequately represented. With the support of the Insect Rearing Group,
additional contributors were selected for a more comprehensive coverage of
insect rearing. The goal was to feature not only academic research reviews but
to also balance these basic contributions with
descriptions of active government
and private-sector programs. A special emphasis has been
placed on those
entrepreneurs who have made insect rearing a success in the marketplace.
Preface
We offer our thanks to the many people and organizations without whose
help this project would not have been successful. Working with manuscripts
from around the world, V. V. Robinson, Phyllis Mayfield, Nichole Hornsby,
Mary Miles, and Susan Anderson typed the chapters and
text and tables for all
keyed in the editorial changes. Teri Houck and Tom Knecht were responsible
for technical editing, layout, and preparation of final camera-ready copy. The
National Biological Control Institute of APHIS generously provided a grant for
final technical editing of the camera-ready copy. The North Carolina
Entomological Society contributed time and services in overseeing the proper
disbursement of the grant funds. The Agricultural Products Division of BASF
Corp. funded production of quality photographic plates for many of the charts
and illustrations and supported the many miscellaneous secretarial functions
associated with this project.
T. E. A. and N. C. L.
PART ONE
Historical Perspective
DOl: 10.1201/9780429043246-1
1
The Insect Rearing Group
and the Development of
Insect Rearing as a Profession
W. A. Dickerson and N. C. Leppla
Insect rearing has been a part of human history for more than 5,000 years,
if beekeeping and silk production are taken into account. The ancient Egyptians
commonly cultured honeybees for food and embalming materials. Marco Polo,
describing his trip to China in 1255 A.D., stated that •no fewer than a thousand
carriages and packhorses, loaded with silk, make their way daily into Peking. •
Except for these two examples, however, insect rearing was essentially a static
art from 3000 B.C. until1900 A.D. Papers on rearing Drosophila sp. began
to appear in the early 1900s as a consequence of genetic studies. Nutritional and
rearing studies of the European com borer and pink bollworm followed in the
1940s. Beginning in the mid 1950s, insect rearing proliferated, perhaps inspired
by publication of the first successful artificial diet for a phytophagous insect by
Stanley D. Beck et al. (1949).
The science and profession of insect rearing gained acceptance during the
1950s and grew exponentially during the next two decades. This expansion
occurred because insect rearing was required in order to develop and implement
new pest control technologies, such as host plant resistance, chemical and
microbial pesticides, sterile insect technique, and biological control. The
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) identified a nucleus of
scientists dedicated to advancing this field and in 1958 held a national conference
entitled •eutture of Insects as a Requisite for Research on Insect Control. • This
meeting was followed in 1963 by a second USDA national meeting, "Planning
and Training Conference for Insect Nutrition and Rearing. • This conference
included sections on basic rearing research, rearing for experimentation, and
3
DOI: I 0.1201 /9780429043246-2
Dickerson & Leppla
mass rearing for control and eradication. This approach was expanded to
include international
specialists. Many of their programs were described in
Insect Colonization and Mass Production, edited by Carroll N. Smith in 1964 ,
and Radiation, Radioisotopes, and Rearing Methods in the Control of Insect
Pests, published by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in 1967.
A new generation of scientists built on this work during the late 1960s and early
1970s.
By the mid 1970s, virtually every entomological research facility of any
appreciable size included an insectary, and most entomological research utilized
some laboratory-reared insects. However, concerns began to be expressed
regarding the quality of these insects and, as a consequence, some resources
were redirected from production to quality control. In 1974, the USDA held a
References
17 : 9 25
-
.
Boller , E. F. & D. L. Chambers , editors. 1977 .
Quality control: An idea book
for fruit fly workers .
Dickerson W. A. , J. D. Hoffman E. G.
, , King , N. C. Leppa & T. M. ODell .
in culture .
Entomological Society of America .
DOl: I 0.1201/9780429043246-3
2
Molecular Genetic Mechanisms
for Sex-Specific Selection
Alfred M. Handler
Introduction
11
001:10.1201/9780429043246-4
Handler
schemes. Although molecular genetic studies to create and test genes for genetic
sexing under way, it should be noted that the implementation of these
are
techniques will depend upon the ability to integrate these gene fusions, by germ
line transformation, into appropriate host genomes. Thus far, efficient gene
Molecular Genetic Mechanisms for Sex-Specific Selection
autosomal wild type gene for pupal color onto the male-limited Y
chromosome.
dominant gene being Y-linked. This would result in males consistently being
duplicated for the translocated region, with a partial Y deficiency. Females
would be euploid.
Thus, while translocation strains can be selected for optimal stability and
viability,it may be a formidable task. It is unlikely that they will ever have the
fitness of wild type insects, which could negatively impact the effectiveness of
SIT. Nevertheless, Y-translocation strains may be able to generate enough
numbers of males to offset their decreased fitness and decrease costs to a level
making their use effective. The development of specific translocation strains for
genetic sexing are reviewed below.
Pupal Color
separate the sexes. Following a similar strategy, Rössler (1979) created the first
Y-autosome translocation for genetic-sexing in the Mediterranean fruitfly,
Ceratitis capitata, linking the Y to the wild
gene for brown pupal color.
type
This allowed the distinction of male brown pupae from mutant female black
pupae. More recently, sexing strains distinguishing male brown pupae from
female mutant white pupae have been created. The initial strain apparently was
subject to high levels of recombination under mass-rearing conditions, leading
to a rapid breakdown of the sex-specific coloration (Hooper et al. 1987).
Another pupal coloration strain was recently constructed and its genetic integrity
was analyzed after many generations under both small-scale laboratory rearing
and mass-rearing conditions (Busch-Petersen et al. 1988 ). Although decreased
male viability was observed, only low-level instability of the male-specific
brown coloration was detected under mass-rearing, this being attributed largely
to strain contamination. The major drawback of sexing based
upon pupal color
is that the costs required to rear the females are not eliminated, although the
females can be used for continued breeding.
Temperature-Sensitive Lethals
Chemical-Selection Genes
against female larvae fed ethanol in their diet. The application of this method
to C. capitata, though, first required the isolation of ADH mutants from this
species. Although adh null mutants were finally isolated with some difficulty,
their use was problematic since none were viable as homozygotes (Riva &
Robinson 1986 ), possibly because of preexisting or induced recessive lethal
mutations on the mutant chromosome. These ADH mutations were therefore not
useful for the suggested selection scheme (Riva & Robinson 1983 ), which
required females being homozygous adh-null. Some success was found, though,
in a strain in which males had an adh-null allele translocated to the Y and an
autosomal adh+ allele making it heterozygous viable, though with reduced ADH
activity (Robinson & Riva 1984 ). When fed with allyl-alcohol the males with
reduced ADH activity survived, while females, being adh+, were killed.
Although genetic sexing was achieved with this strain, it has not found practical
use because of problems with viability, sex-ratio bias for females, adh- loss by
recombination, and probably high embryo mortality resulting from the strain's
double translocation (Wood et al. 1985), which renders a majority of the zygotes
aneuploid lethals.
It has since been discovered that much of the difficulty in isolating adh-null
mutants by pentenol screening was probably a result of the medfly having two
distinct genes encoding ADH (Malacrida et al. 1988), as opposed to D.
melanogaster, which has a single locus. Thus, isolating a complete ADH null
mutant in a single screen would require a double mutation (which would be very
rare) in order to survive pentenol selection. If it is discovered that the two
genes have different temporal specificities, it may be possible to isolate
mutations for each gene independently by screening at different developmental
times. Nevertheless, for ADH and other enzyme systems that consist of
duplicate or overlapping gene activities (or for any multifactorial selectable
characteristic), the development and maintenance of genetic-sexing strains would
remain difficult.
(Seawright et al.
1978). Thus far, the development of insecticide resistance
study to isolate resistance genes for chemicals toxic to insects but normally
having low toxicity in mammalian systems. An analysis of potassium sorbate,
Avermectin, and Cyromazine has indicated resistance regulated by a single gene
only for Cyromazine. Further studies on this resistance strain for genetic sexing
are anticipated.
The genetic sexing methods discussed thus far are based upon classical
genetic mechanisms, often resulting from innovative approaches in an effort to
manipulate and genetically stabilize insect species not optimally amenable to
such procedures. Nevertheless, in the 35 years since Knipling (1955) first
proposed the use of SIT, and the 20 years since the first genetic-sexing strain
was developed (Whitten 1969 ), a genetic-sexing strain for mass rearing and
release on a continued basis has not been forthcoming. The use of Y-autosome
translocations has met some success in allowing genetic sexing under laboratory
conditions, but beyond a few cases with mosquitoes, the integrity of these strains
has not been maintained under mass rearing.
The development of genetic-sexing strains based upon recombinant DNA
technology, at least theoretically, should be able to ameliorate many of the
limitations discussed. At this point, though, it is important to note that there are
no specific recombinant DNA molecules available that would assuredly result in
effective genetic sexing, and the technology to transfer such molecules into non-
drosophilid host genomes (i.e., germline transformation) is still being developed.
Thus, this discussion will generally be prospective and to a large extent based
on our knowledge of gene isolation, function, and manipulation in D.
Gene Structure
Beyond defining temporal and spatial activity, regulatory elements can specify
sex-specific activity; feedback and responses to hormones, metals,
regulation;
or environmental influences such as temperature or stress, among others types
adult insect regardless of the chromosomal sex (Belote et al. 1985, McKeown
et al. 1987). This indicates that for the YP genes at least, sex-specific
is
regulation direct, or at least does not depend upon tissue differentiation, and
that a sex-specific regulatory element exists which responds to sex-determination
gene activity. YP promoter regions have already been linked to the adh coding
region (YP-Adh), resulting in ADH activity consistent with YP regulation, in
particular, being under female-specific and hormonal control (Shirras & Bownes
1987 ).
When present in an adh- background, the YP-Adh fusion gene could
conceivably allow genetic sexing based upon female-specific sensitivity to
pentenol or allyl-alcohol (Fig. 3A). Although the YP female-specific regulatory
element has not been isolated, adh expression is nevertheless normal because it
shares the same tissue and
developmental specificities in the adult fat body as
YP. Thus, regulatory element is defined and isolated its use will be
until the
limited to selectable genes normally expressed in the adult fat body. At present,
Fig.3. Three methods by which molecular genetic manipulation could be
used to achieve genetic sexing using the expression of an alcohol
dehydrogenase gene for positive or negative selection.
practical for genetic sexing in terms of relying on adult selection and
this is not
difficulty developing ADH mutant strains (see above).
in
A more useful strategy would rely on dominant female-specific ectopic
expression of a product resulting in lethality—for example, expression of the
Bacillus thuringiensis toxin, inappropriate expression of chitinase, or ADH
expression in insects that normally do not have ADH, allowing pentenol
selection. Tissue-specific activity would be less important to the lethal function
of such products, although maintenance of females for breeding would depend
upon additional conditional regulation, such as heat shock control. It is
important that such strains would not depend upon preexisting mutations.
Another approach not relying on mutations, although speculative at present,
would be the use of
female-specific expression of antisense RNA. Antisense
RNA results from the transcription of the opposite (complementary) noncoding
DNA strand of a particular gene. Antisense genes are created simply by
inverting part or all of a transcriptional unit with respect to the promoter. When
present together in the cell, antisense RNA can block, to varying degrees, the
translation of the normal sense RNA, thereby prohibiting gene expression and
in effect creating a mutation for that gene. The mechanism by which this
blocking occurs is unknown, though possibly RNA heteroduplex formation
blocking translation plays a role. Antisense RNA has proven most effective in
cell lines in eucaryotic systems (Green et al. 19B6), although embryonic
phenocopies in Drosophila have been produced for the Krüppel embryonic
mutant (Rosenberg et al. 1985). For genetic sexing in insects having normal
adh expression, female-specific expression of antisense adh (using the YP
promoter) could result in female lethality in response to ethanol (Fig. 3B ). This
strategy could be quite efficient, more simply, by using antisense lethal genes
under conditional (i.e., heat shock) control as well as female-specific control.
Female-limited gene expression can also be achieved without a female-
specific promoter. As mentioned previously, intron splicing occurs sex
specifically for three sex-determination genes in D. melanogaster. For these
genes, one of their introns contains
a single 5' splice acceptor site, but two 3'
splice acceptor sites with a translational stop signal encoded within the two sites.
If the first 3' acceptor site (5' to the second site) is utilized, as occurs
specifically in males, then the stop signal is revealed in the transcript,
resulting
in truncated nonfunctional gene product (Fig. 3C). If the second 3'
a
acceptor
splice site is utilized, as occurs in females, the stop signal is excised with the
intron from the transcript, resulting in a full-length functional product. If a
selectable gene is linked in frame to one of these sex-determination genes in the
exon immediately downstream (3') to the intron, then its
expression should
occur only in females where the open reading frame is maintained. The
resulting gene product would be a fusion protein containing part of the sex-
determination gene product and the full-length selectable gene. Various enzymes
produced as fusion proteins are able to maintain their function. A major
advantage female-specific promoter, such as the YP promoter, is that the
over a
only marginally fertile, and transformed females (into males at 29° C) have
lowered viability. Theoretically, elimination of tra-2 activity could also be
achieved without inducing mutations by having an antisense tra-2 gene linked to
a heat-shock promoter integrated into the genome.
At present, this type of scheme for genetic sexing is highly speculative for
nondrosophilid insects, but it nevertheless illustrates one of the greatest potential
strengths for the use of recombinant DNA techniques. Its enormous efficiency
compared to other methods discussed is demonstrated by the fact that all the
Fig. 4. Diagram of how conditional manipulation of the temperature-
sensitive transformer-2ts allele from Drosophila melanogaster can be used to
create a breeding stock of flies yielding only sterile males.
resultant zygotes are allowed to develop and can be used for release, requiring
maintenance of a 50% smaller breeding population. Chemical or mechanical
male selection and sterilization mechanisms would be unnecessary, eliminating
the considerable time, labor, and equipment costs associated with these
procedures. Since the basic methodology does function in Drosophila, it is quite
conceivable that similar sex-determining mechanisms exist in other insects
(Nöthiger & Steinmann-Zwicky 1985) and may be similarly manipulated to
achieve male-limited progeny and sterilization. The expenditure of resources
and effort required to identify and isolate sex-determining genes and the ability
to perform gene transformation efficiently (which in turn would facilitate
References
Baker , B. S. 1989 Sex in flies: the splice of life Nature 340 : 521 524
. .
-
.
1985 .
Sex-specific regulation of yolk protein gene expression in Drosophila .
Curtis , C. F. , J.
Akiyama & G. Davidson 1976 A genetic sexing system in . .
49 : 649 662-
.
Green P. J. O. Pines & M. Inouye 1986 The role of antisense RNA in gene
, , . .
Hiriazumi , Y. 1971 .
Spontaneous recombination in Drosophila melanogaster
males . Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 68 : 268 278 -
.
Fruit Flies (Proc. 2nd Int. Symp. Colymbari, Crete, 1986) Elsevier , .
Amsterdam .
Progress in
developing a genetic sexing strain using genetic engineering
methodology (IAEA-Sm-301/28) pp. 251 256 In Proceedings, Modern ,
-
.
Insect Control: Nuclear Techniques and Biotechnology . International
Symposium Vienna, , Austria 1987 .
Mouches , C. 1988 .
Génétique chez les insectes; Clonage et transgénose de
génes de résistance aux insecticides (IAEA-SM-301-23) , pp. 257 261 In -
..
621 .
24 : 765 774 -
.
Robinson , A. S. 1984 .
Unexpected segregation ratios from male-linked
translocations in the Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata (Diptera:
Tephritidae) . Genetica 62 : 209 213 -
.
306 .