Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ebook Sustainable Development Goals and Migration 1St Edition P Sivakumar Editor Online PDF All Chapter
Ebook Sustainable Development Goals and Migration 1St Edition P Sivakumar Editor Online PDF All Chapter
https://ebookmeta.com/product/from-millennium-development-goals-
to-sustainable-development-goals-rethinking-african-
development-1st-edition-kobena-t-hanson/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/sustainable-bioeconomy-pathways-to-
sustainable-development-goals-v-venkatramanan/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/geosciences-and-the-sustainable-
development-goals-1st-edition-joel-c-gill/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/migration-remittances-and-
sustainable-development-in-africa-1st-edition-maty-konte/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/ecological-limits-of-development-
living-with-the-sustainable-development-goals-1st-edition-
kaitlin-kish/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/biotechnological-approaches-to-
sustainable-development-goals-patrick-omoregie-isibor-editor/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/atlas-of-sustainable-development-
goals-2018-from-world-development-indicators-1st-edition-world-
world-bank/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/waste-recovery-and-management-an-
approach-toward-sustainable-development-goals-1st-edition-
ashwini-kumar/
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS
AND MIGRATION
This book looks at migration in contemporary society and its interrelations with
development. It presents the complexities and dilemmas associated with migration,
the changes in theoretical and historical perspectives on migration and develop-
ment, and the role of policies and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in
this context.
The book views migration as a phenomenon for advancing human development
outcomes. It deals with wide-ranging issues including labour migration, the idea
of decent work, migration and transnationalism, remittances, social networks and
capital, and addressing poverty. The chapters highlight the focus of the SDGs and
its relevance on migrant rights, safeguarding livelihoods and health. They also offer
insights into regional and international cooperation on policies for migration, social
growth and protection, and citizenship. With comparative analyses of data, trends
and development indicators as well as various case studies, this book examines the
impact of migration on international relations and politics, labour market outcomes,
gender, youth and education among others. It also discusses the loss of lives and
livelihoods due to the Covid-19 pandemic, its impact on migration and the effects
of the pandemic on the contemporary discussions on migration and SDGs.
Rich in empirical data, this book will be an excellent read for scholars and
researchers of migration and diaspora studies, development studies, refugee stud-
ies, public policy and governance, international relations, political studies, political
economy, sociology and South Asian Studies.
P. Sivakumar is Head at the Centre for Monitoring, Evaluation and Impact Analysis
(CMEIA) and Faculty and Head in Charge of the Department of Development
Studies, Rajiv Gandhi National Institute of Youth Development (RGNIYD),
Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports, Government of India.
S. Irudaya Rajan is Chairman of the International Institute of Migration and
Development, India (IIMAD). Prior to this, he was Professor at the Centre for
Development Studies (CDS), Kerala, India.
SUSTAINABLE
DEVELOPMENT GOALS
AND MIGRATION
Index 221
FIGURES
12.5 Annual growth rate of real GDP per employed person, 2018 and 2019
(percentage) 216
12.6 Share of young people (aged 18–29) who reported having stopped
working after the onset of the pandemic (%) 217
12.7 Biggest SDG transformation challenges ranked per region 217
12.8 Percentage of governments reporting policy measures to facilitate
orderly, safe, regular and responsible migration and mobility of people by
domain, 2019 218
TABLES
Vijay Korra is assistant professor at the Centre for Economic and Social Studies
(CESS), Hyderabad, Telangana. He holds PhD in economics in the area of labour
migration and MGNREGS from Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU), New Delhi,
through Centre for Development Studies (CDS), Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala. His
research interest includes migration studies, economics of labour markets, unem-
ployment, MGNREGA, issues of de-notified tribes, development of marginalized
sections, and tribal economy. He has published quite a number of research articles
in the area of migration and aforementioned areas in the reputed national jour-
nals and international edited volumes. He has published a book titled “Forgotten
Communities of Telangana and Andhra Pradesh: A Story of De-notified Tribes”,
published by Palgrave Macmillan (2019). He has completed several major projects
and is currently working on a major study entitled “Social and Economic Cost of
Gulf Migration: A Study of Telangana and Andhra Pradesh”.
P. Sivakumar is Head, Centre for Monitoring, Evaluation and Impact Analysis
(CMEIA) and Faculty and Head in Charge, Department of Development Studies,
Rajiv Gandhi National Institute of Youth Development (RGNIYD), Ministry
of Youth Affairs and Sports, Government of India, is a Post-Doctoral Fellow in
Development Ethics (Indian Council of Philosophical Research Fellowship). He
has obtained PhD from Kerala University and holds Master's Degrees in Sociology
and Philosophy.
He served as a member of the Technical Working Group on Integrating
Volunteerism into SDGs constituted by United Nations Volunteers (UNV).
Presently, Dr Sivakumar is heading a project with UNICEF to prepare Status
Papers on five thematic areas such as Impact of COVID-19 on Internal Migrants in
India; Livelihoods of Women in the Informal Sector during the Pandemic: Challenges and
Responses; and An Analysis of Youth Employment/Unemployment in the Post-COVID-19
scenario; Health Status of Children in India; and Youth in Tamil Nadu: Review of Education,
Employment Status and Post-pandemic challenges.
S. Irudaya Rajan is Chairman, the International Institute of Migration and
Development, India (IIMAD). Prior to this, he was professor at the Centre for
Development Studies (CDS) and set up a Research Unit on International Migration
(RUM), fully funded by the erstwhile Ministry of Overseas Indian Affairs and acted
as a chair during 2006–2016. With more than three decades of research experience,
he has coordinated eight migration surveys in Kerala since 1998 (with Professor K.C.
Zachariah), led the migration surveys in Goa, Punjab and Tamil Nadu and provided
technical support to the Gujarat migration survey. He has published extensively in
national and international journals on demographic, social, economic, political and
psychological implications of both internal and international migration. He has
worked closely with the erstwhile Ministry of Overseas Indian Affairs, Government
of India, Department of Non-Resident Keralite Affairs (NORKA), Government of
Kerala and Kerala State Planning Board. He is the co-chair of the working group on
NORKA for the 13th five-year plan (2017–2022) of Kerala State Planning Board.
He is editor of the two Routledge series: India Migration Report (annual) since
Contributors xv
2010 and South Asia Migration Report (biennial) since 2017 and is the founder
editor-in-chief of the journal Migration and Development. Currently, he is the
Chair of the KNOMAD (The Global Knowledge Partnership on Migration and
Development, World Bank) working group on internal migration and urbaniza-
tion. He is one of the expert committee members in Kerala’s task force to advise
the Government of Kerala on Covid-19. Currently, he is Dean, Faculty of Social
Sciences, Kannur University, Adjunct Professor, Indian Institute of Technology (IIT)
Hyderabad, and Visiting Professor, Gulati Institute of Finance and Taxation, Kerala.
PREFACE
The journey from Brundtland commission to ‘Agenda 2030’ has been remarkable
as it resulted in all nations accommodating sustainable development in the national
development agenda. Yet the journey so far has been filled with challenges such as
unaccomplished/partially accomplished targets, stressful ecosystem and looming cli-
mate change. This challenge creates a pressure on development experts to broaden
the concept of development and accommodate more innovative ways of addressing
developmental issues. It has been a proven fact that sustainable development requires
dialogues among all stakeholders and the dialogue needs to be positioned from the
premise of intrinsic values. The signposts/milestones to development need to be
identified from the people who are denied the opportunity to realize the benefits
of development.The Agenda 2030 is a step forward in this direction, and the success
in achieving SDGs largely depend on how young people in the world embrace the
concept of sustainable development.
The number of international migrants continues to grow over the past several
years, crossing 281 million in 2020. Migration is seen as an engine of economic
growth, and it allows millions of people to integrate with international community
and strengthen bonds between countries and societies by re-interpreting the con-
cept of “boundaries/borders”. At the same time, the linkage between migration and
development cannot be captured simply as transfers of population from one area to
another area (say, for example, rural to urban area) and its associated developments.
Since migration as such encompasses varied, multiple complexities, it requires mul-
tiple ‘lenses’ – in addition to the standard economic lens – in order to study role
of migration in development processes. The Agenda 2030 and Global Compact
on Migration are two important instruments that see migration as an opportunity
which can be used as a tool for fostering sustainable development. In this regard,
this book captures this opportunity and attempts to map the SDGs and indicators
related to migration.
Preface xvii
At the time of finalizing this book, the world has dramatically changed due to
COVID-19 crisis. The polarization due to COVID-19 is visible in all senses that
even the academic literature has changed immensely into pre-COVID and post-
COVID scenarios. The threat posed by the COVID-19 pandemic is devastating
as all the governments were compelled to suspend routine activities and economy
became standstill, leaving most of the migrants to face the threat without any sup-
port or coping mechanism. It took for a while to activate the response system in
most of the countries and swung into action. However, the choice left to us is
to continue to fight the pandemic and also to continue and sustain the progress
made on SDG. In this direction, the book, Sustainable Development Goals and
Migration looks at SDGs through the lens of migration. The major theme of the
book is the nexus between migration and sustainable development. The book is
focusing on the nuances of migration-specific SDGs rather than the demarcation
of national–international contexts. This was a deliberate attempt as the process of
outlining SDGs in connection with migration seemed more significant since coun-
tries were starting to implement SDG targets during that time many of which were
cross-cutting in the context of migration.
Editors
1
CONTOURS OF MIGRATION AND
DEVELOPMENT IN THE SDG AGENDA
P. Sivakumar and S. Irudaya Rajan
Introduction
The Nobel laureate economist, Amartya Sen, places his concept of development by
quoting Immanuel Kant’s most famous dictum “So act as to treat humanity, whether
in thine own person or in that of any other, in every case as an end withal, never as
means only”. His argument postulates that the process of development must treat
every person as an end in themselves rather than as a means alone. This proposition
is most critically valid in the context of migration and development in the contem-
porary scenario. Migration needs to be viewed as advancing human development
outcomes and also fosters overall development. However, every aspect of migra-
tion cannot be treated in this direction as migration also occurs in stressful situa-
tions let it be forced migration or unsafe migration. There are plentiful literature
highlighting the significance of migration’s contribution towards poverty reduction
and human development (Afsar, 2003; Deshingkar, 2006; Tandoh-Offin and Awuse,
2013; Zachariah, Mathew and Rajan, 2003; Zachariah and Rajan, 2012). As human
development principles underscore people as real wealth of nations, it is important
to understand the linkages between migration and development in the context of
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
DOI: 10.4324/9780429346866-1
2 P. Sivakumar and S. Irudaya Rajan
The above pointers are conjoining with migration and development, and, in fact, the
migration-development nexus has to be centred around these pointers, which gives
us a comprehensive understanding. The mainstream development strategies typi-
cally involve major human costs and suffering (Des Gasper 2004), which in other
words, indicate the plight of migrants in informal sector, where they are engaged
in 3D jobs (dirty, dangerous and demeaning). What is required in this context is to
enhance the capabilities of migrants and subsequently create decent and sustainable
jobs in labour market. This can be illustrated through the following Figure 1.1:
Robert Chambers argues that livelihoods and capabilities are both ends and
means in development thinking, whereas the concept of equity and sustainability
are the principles that makes livelihood to qualify responsible well-being (Robert
Chambers 2005). The migration-development nexus in 2030 agenda needs to be
built around these frameworks.
Theoretical approaches
The heterogeneous nature of migration and development puts the theoreti-
cal approaches in “Migration and Development” studies in a complex perspec-
tive. Though migration studies and development studies are the interdisciplinary
in nature, there is hardly any interdisciplinarity is visible until recently (King and
Collyer 2016). One such notable attempt is by Caroline Brettell and Hollifield
(2015) who tried to summarize the principal research questions, methodologies and
dominant theories in various disciplines in relation to migration (Table 1.2)
The spectrum of “Migration and Development” is confronted with multiplic-
ity of dimensions like labour migration, livelihoods and migration, migration and
transnationalism, remittances, social networks and social capital, addressing poverty,
etc. However, binary thinking has dominated both migration and development lit-
erature (Parvati Raghuram 2020). Parvati Raghuram in her article draws a picture
of such binaries which is depicted in the following Table 1.3:
Parallel to this, there are opposing views on migration and development (Table 1.4)
proposed by Hein de Hass of University of Oxford. Hein de Haas (2010) explains:
millennium declaration along with MDG goals in some areas is “too difficult to
measure unambiguously or too sensitive to handle politically” (Browne and Weiss
2014). During 2001, the 56th session of UN General Assembly passed a resolution
on international migration and development and stressed the following:
Calls upon all relevant bodies, agencies, funds and programmes of the United
Nations system and other relevant intergovernmental, regional and sub regional
organizations, within their continuing mandated activities, to continue to
address the issue of international migration and development and to provide
appropriate support for interregional, regional and sub regional processes and
activities on international migration and development, with a view to integrat-
ing migration issues in a more coherent way within the broader context of the
implementation of agreed economic and social development programmes;
(United Nations 2002)
The above resolution was necessary as prior to IOM’s entry into UN as official
migration agency, there were no UN agency mandated with migration as primary
focus. Only exceptions to this were ILO’s focus on labour migration and UNHCR’s
focus on refugees and displaced populations. However as early in 2006, as a response
to the recommendation of the Global Commission on International Migration, the
UN Secretary General has appointed the Global Migration Group as
The Position Document prepared by Global Migration Group demanded that the
post 2015 agenda should have the following three-pronged strategy:
Prior to this the UN Conference on Sustainable Development in the year 2012 also
has highlighted that sustainable development require meaningful involvement and
active participation of all stakeholders including migrants.
which are indicative of understanding who is left behind (UNDP 2018). These key
factors are:
1. Discrimination
2. Geography
3. Governance
4. Socio-economic Status
5. Shocks and fragility
A person may be left behind due to any one of the factors or a combination of fac-
tors mentioned above. Each one of these factors has direct or indirect significance to
migration. The United Nations Committee for Development Policy highlights that
among others the “large share of young people in internal and international migration
generate additional challenges to meeting the pledge leave no one behind” (UN 2018).
Migration is encompassed in 2030 agenda in a number of goals and targets and
notable among these are SDG No. 4,5,8,10,16 and 17.The central focus of migration
is covered in the SDG 10.7 – facilitatingorderly, safe, regular and responsible migra-
tion and mobility of people, including through the implementation of planned and
well-managed migration policies (Figure 1.2). However, it is important to be noted
that most of the targets related to migration, including targets belonging to Tier 2,
which means the indicator is conceptually clear, have an internationally established
methodology and standards, but data are not regularly produced by countries.1
With regard to the SDG10.7 where migration is covered most prominently out
of all SDGs, there has been renewed attempt to capture progress and data. IOM,
the official UN migration agency has been a frontrunner in this attempt and in the
year 2015 IOM commissioned the task of developing a comprehensive Migration
Governance Index (MGI) with The Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU) of The
Economist, a leading publisher. The MGI comprised of five domains:
1. Institutional Capacity
2. Migrant rights
3. Safe and orderly migration
4. Labour migration management
5. Regional and international cooperation and other partnership.
• The coordination and collaboration across the government and across the sectors
ranging from healthcare to education is key to better facilitation of migration, and
a comprehensive migration policy depends on this collaboration and coherence.
Contours of migration and development 9
Human → Combating all types of trafficking and exploitation 5.2, 8.7, 16.2
Trafficking and → Addressing trafficking and exploitation of women
Exploitation and children
Diaspora and Goal 8 Decent Work and 8.9 • Including migration and migrants in development partnerships
Partnerships Economic Growth
for Goal 9 Industry, Innovation and 9.2,
Development Infrastructure
Goal 12 Responsible 12.B
By analysing SDG targets specific to migration and crosscutting goals and tar-
gets related to migration, it is imperative that migration interacts with all aspects of
development and is multidimensional in nature.The introductory statement of 2030
agenda stresses this perspective:
In Chapter 4, Rohini Mitra and Priyansha Singh trace the important develop-
ments with regard to the SDGs in the context of migration and map the works
done by NITI Aayog and also analyse the National Indicator Framework on SDG
(NIF) for India by the Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation. NIF is
prepared based on the inputs provided by various Ministries/Departments under the
Government of India.They compare the NIF with the Global Indicator Framework
(GIF) and argue that several migration-related targets and indicators such as 8.8
(protect labour rights and promote safe and secure working environments for all
workers, including migrant workers, in particular women migrants, and those in pre-
carious employment), 10.7 (facilitate orderly, safe, regular and responsible migration
and mobility of people, including through the implementation of planned and well
managed migration policies), 10.c (by 2030, reduce to less than 3 per cent the trans-
action costs of migrant remittances and eliminate remittance corridors with costs
higher than 5 per cent), 5.2, 8.7 and 16.2 (different aspects of human trafficking),
17.3 (additional financial resources) and 17.18 (availability of high-quality, timely
and reliable data disaggregated – including for migratory status) have been included
in the Global Indicator Framework (GIF) as compared to the NIF in case of India
where indicators for 10.7 are yet to be identified. The chapter gives an overview
of the above indicators and attempts to identify potential indicators to target 10.7
and thereby by provide the baseline for same. This chapter focuses exclusively on
international migration and its related aspects from India with respect to target 10.7.
Chapter 5 by Surabhi Singh is a continuation of Chapter 4; whereas the for-
mer focused on international migration, this chapter argues that India’s vision of
SDG implementation has remained limited in its scope by leaving an analysis of
internal migration outside of its ambit. The author argues that part of this limita-
tion is derived from global context itself as the basic SDG framework appears to
focus more on issues of immigration, emigration, international labour migration
and remittance. The internal migration is not an explicit focus in the SDGs and the
implementation and monitoring approach taken by the Indian Government; there-
fore, it has not centred on the issue despite it playing a vital role in India’s national
economy (Rajan and Sumeetha, 2019).
The concept of “feminization of migration” is one of the important thematic
areas in migration-development nexus. As mentioned in the Table 1.6, SDG 5.2; 5.3,
5.4, 5.A, 5.C is linked with migration and it includes protection of migrant domes-
tic workers and addresses gender-related vulnerabilities. In this context, by Sahu
(Chapter 7) explores these issues in detail in the context of young migrant women
from South Asia in the United Arab Emirates (Chowdhury and Rajan, 2018; Rajan,
2019). The author examines the trends and patterns of international migration in
general and female migration in particular from South Asia to the Gulf, in the con-
text of feminization of international migration. The chapter gives a vivid analysis of
how young women negotiate their identities and how migration is used as a strategy
to empower themselves. The chapter ends with policy prescriptions that could be
adopted to improve female migration outcomes in near future (Rajan and Joseph,
2015; Walton-Roberts and Rajan, 2020).
16 P. Sivakumar and S. Irudaya Rajan
Taking cues from SDG10.7 (to facilitate orderly, safe and responsible migration
and mobility of people, including through implementation of planned and well-
managed migration policies), Sulaiman and Bhagat (Chapter 11) explore potential
migration of youth from the perspective of the development of a migration culture
(Zachariah and Rajan, 2016). The authors argue that the attempt to understand the
potential reasons and issues related to future migration flows are essential for build-
ing institutional capacity to anticipate, prepare for possible future crises and produce
policies better attuned to future trends as mentioned in the SDG10.7. In this con-
text, the chapter analyses potential nature of international migration and assesses
the importance of factors underlying the selection of migration destination and the
importance of elements affecting the nature of jobs undertaken, taking into account
payroll expectations of potential migrants.
Note
1 The United Nations Statistics division has the following classifications/definitions on
SDG indicators for the facilitation of implementation of the global indicator framework.
These classifications are based on the level of methodological development and the avail-
ability of data at global level:
Tier 1: Indicator is conceptually clear, has an internationally established methodology
and standards are available, and data are regularly produced by countries for at least
50 per cent of countries and of the population in every region where the indicator
is relevant.
Tier 2: Indicator is conceptually clear, has an internationally established methodology
and standards are available, but data are not regularly produced by countries.
Tier 3: No internationally established methodology or standards are yet available for
the indicator, but methodology/standards are being (or will be) developed or tested.
(As of the 51st session of the UN Statistical Commission, the global indicator frame-
work does not contain any Tier 3 indicators)
References
Afsar, R. (2003, June 22–24). Internal migration and the development nexus: The case of
Bangladesh. [Paper Presentation]. Regional Conference on Migration, Development and Pro-
Poor Policy Choices in Asia, Dhaka: Bangladesh.
Brettell, C., & Hollifield, J. F. (2015). Migration Theory: Talking Across Disciplines (3rd Edition).
London: Routledge.
Browne, S. and Weiss, T. G. (2014). The UN we want for the world we want. In Browne, S.
and Weiss, T. G. (Eds.), Post-2015 UN Development: Making Change Happen? London and
New York: Routledge.
Castles, S. (2010). Understanding global migration: A social transformation perspective. Journal
of Ethnic and Migration Studies 36(10): 1565–1586. DOI:10.1080/1369183X.2010.489381
Chowdhury, M., & Rajan, S. I. (Eds.) (2018). South Asian Migration in the Gulf. Singapore:
Palgrave MacMillan.
De Haas, H. (2010). Migration and development: A theoretical perspective. International
Migration Review 44(1): 227–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2009.00804.x
18 P. Sivakumar and S. Irudaya Rajan
Deshingkar, P. (2006). Internal migration, poverty and development in Asia. ODI Briefing
Paper 11. London: Overseas Development Institute.
DeWind, J.,&Holdaway, J. (Eds.) (2008). Migration and Development Within and Across Borders:
Research and Policy Perspectives on Internal and International Migration. London: Hammersmith
Press.
Fukuda-Par, &Shivakumar, A. K. (2004). Readings in Human Development: Concepts, Measures
and Policies for a Development Paradigm. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Gasper, D. (2004). The Ethics of Development. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
International Labour Organization (ILO). (1999). International Labour Conference 87th
Session Report III (1B) Migrant Workers. https://www.ilo.org/public/english/stan-
dards/relm/ilc/ilc87/r3-1b2.htm
International Organization for Migration (IOM). (2018). Migration and 2030. Agenda: A
guide for Practitioners.
Kandemir, O. (2012). Human development and international migration. Procedia - Social and
Behavioural Sciences 62: 446–451. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.073
King, R., &Collyer, M.(2016). Migration and development framework and its links to inte-
gration. In B. Garces-Mascarenas and R. Penninx (Eds.), Integration Processes and Policies in
Europe; Contexts, Levels and Actors (pp. 167–188). Springer.
Raghuram, P. (2020). Migration and development: theoretical legacies and analytical agen-
das in the age of rising powers. In T. Bastia and R. Skeldon (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of
Migration and Development (pp. 43–53). London and New York: Routledge.
Rajan, S. I. (2012). Editorial. Migration and Development. 1(1): 1–4.
Rajan, S. I. (2015). Migration and development: In pursuit of Unlimited Debates. Migration
and Development 4(1): 1–3.
Rajan, S. I. (2019). The crisis of Gulf migration. In C. Menjivar, M. Ruiz, and I. Ness (Eds.),
The Oxford Handbook of Migration Crises (pp. 849–868). New York: Oxford University.
Rajan, S. I., &Joseph, J. (2015). Migrant women at the discourse–policy nexus: Indian domes-
tic workers in Saudi Arabia. In S. I. Rajan (Ed.), India Migration Report 2015: Gender and
Migration (pp. 9–25). New Delhi: Routledge.
Rajan, S. I., &M. Sumeetha (Eds.), (2019). Handbook of Internal Migration in India. New Delhi:
Sage.
Robert Chambers. (2005). Ideas for Development. London: Institute of Development Studies;
Earth Scan.
Skeldon, R. (1997). Migration and Development: A Global Perspective. Oxfordshire: Routledge.
Skeldon, R. (2008, September). Migration and Development.Thailand: United Nations Economic
and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific Population Division, Department of
Economic and Social Affairs Bangkok.
Tandoh-Offin, P., &Awuse, N. (2013). Internal migration and poverty reduction in Ghana.
Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development 4(18): 63–70.
The Economist Intelligence Unit. (2016). Measuring Well-Governed Migration: The2016
Migration Governance Index. London: The Economist Intelligence Unit.
The Global Migration Group. (n.d.). United Nations office of the high commissioner. https://www.
ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Migration/Pages/GlobalMigrationGroupIndex.aspx Accessed on
23 June 2020.
United Nations. (2002). Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on international migration and
development. https://www.iom.int/jahia/webdav/shared/shared/mainsite/policy_and_
research/un/56/A_RES_56_203_en.pdf Accessed on 23 June 2020.
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable
Development. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015.
https://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=
Contours of migration and development 19
Introduction
Mobility has been central to human existence since the dawn of civilizational
memory. The patterns, causes and consequences that characterize human mobil-
ity – manifested in terms of both internal and international migration, continue to
evolve, with its social, economic and political underpinnings across distinct geog-
raphies. The United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UN
DESA) observes that the global number of international migrants has grown faster
than the world’s population. In 2019, UN DESA estimated that there were 272 mil-
lion international migrants, compared to 221 million in 2010.
The UN’s formalized thinking on the challenges and opportunities resulting
from migration is reflected more succinctly in the policy developments since 2015,
including in the adoption of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, with
the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) at its core. The 17 SDGs provide a
comprehensive framework to address various global development challenges and to
this end, they offer a “blueprint to achieve a better and more sustainable future for
all” (UN, 2015).
Within the wide gamut of the 17 SDGs and the associated 169 targets, one
among the direct migration-linked target pertains to SDG target 10.7which calls
on countries to “facilitate orderly, safe, regular and responsible migration and mobil-
ity of people, including through the implementation of planned and well-managed
migration policies” (UN, n.d.).The fact that this target is located with the SDG
Goal 10 – to “reduce inequality within and among countries” – offers possibilities
to reflect on the interrelationship between migration and inequality with its cause
and effects. For policymakers, to actualize the goal of implementing planned and
well-managed migration policies, the main prerequisite is the availability of timely,
reliable, accessible, and comparable data. To this end, another SDG target 17.18 calls
DOI: 10.4324/9780429346866-2
Migration and SDGs 21
for the need to increase the availability of high-quality, timely and reliable data
disaggregated by migratory status, among other parameters such as income, gender,
age, race, ethnicity, disability and geographic location (UN, n.d.).
Alongside these migration-linked targets, migration also appears as an intersect-
ing theme across other SDGs. Table 2.1 shows how migration is a cross-cutting
issue across the SDGs, intersecting with poverty, gender, climate change, peace and
justice, inequality and urbanization.
Following the adoption of SDGs, 193 UN Member States came together at the
UN General Assembly in September, 2016 to adopt the New York Declaration
for Refugees and Migrants, which recognized the need for a comprehensive
approach to migration (GMDAC, 2018). The Global Compact for Safe, Orderly
and Regular Migration (GCM), an inter-governmentally negotiated agreement
adopted in December, 2018 was another policy development that resulted from
the Declaration. GCM was designed in order to be consistent with the SDG target
10.7 (GMDAC, 2020). Similar to the SDG target of 17.18, GCM incorporated
few commitments which directly pertain to migration statistics in its final text,
including the need to “harmonize methodologies on collection, analysis and dis-
semination of migration-related data and indicators to achieve international com-
patibility” (GMDAC, 2020).
Of central interest to this chapter are SDGs directly relevant to migration.
According to International Organization for Migration’s (IOM)Global Migration
Data Analysis Centre (GMDAC), there is an existing data gap when it comes to
accurate and comparable data on international migration (GMDAC, 2018). The
major sources of migration statistics are obtained at the national level, and this cre-
ates difficulty for cross-country comparisons due to differences in definitions around
“migration” and the frequency at which data sets are being released. In addition,
select migration topics have been found to receive more attention and resources
compared to others, in terms of data collection. For instance, IOM’s GMDAC
(2017) estimated that more data has been collected on migration topics such as stu-
dent migration, ratification of international conventions, migrant stocks, remittances
and human trafficking. Meanwhile, topics such as migration flows, irregular migra-
tion, health of migrants, the impact of migration policies, recruitment costs, return
migration, smuggling, migrant integration and missing migrants have received less
attention in terms of migration statistics.
At the same time, there have been successful research interventions in the form
of specialized migration surveys – at the inter-country level or country-based des-
tination/origin –which have been conducted across the world with the coopera-
tion of various national governments as well as multilateral agencies (Rajan, 2020;
Rajan, Zachariah and Kumar, 2020; Beauchemin, 2014). Though not an exhaustive
list, some examples include the household International Migration Surveys in the
Mediterranean countries (MED-HIMS),The World Bank Africa Migration Project,
The Migration from Africa to Europe (MAFE), The Latin America Migration
Project and The NIDI- Eurostat Push-
Pulls International Migration project
(GMDAC, 2018).
22 S. Irudaya Rajan and Ardra Manasi
SDG Goal
SDG 1 End poverty in all its forms everywhere
SDG 3 Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages
SDG 4 Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong
learning opportunities for all
Target 4b By 2020, substantially expand globally the number of scholarships available
to developing countries, in particular, least developed countries, small island
developing States and African countries, for enrolment in higher education,
including vocational training and information and communications
technology, technical, engineering and scientific programmes, in developed
countries and other developing countries
SDG 5 Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls
Target 5.2 Eliminate all forms of violence against all women and girls in public and
private spheres, including trafficking and sexual and other types of
exploitation
SDG 8 Promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full
and productive employment and decent work for all
Target 8.7 Take immediate and effective measures to eradicate forced labour, end modern
slavery and human trafficking and secure the prohibition and elimination
of the worst forms of child labour, including recruitment and use of child
soldiers, and by 2025 end child labour in all its forms
Target 8.8 Protect labour rights and promote safe and secure working environments of all
workers, including migrant workers, particularly women migrants and those
in precarious employment
SDG 10 Reduce inequality within and among countries
Target 10.7 Facilitate orderly, safe and responsible migration and mobility of people,
including through implementation of planned and well-managed migration
policies
Target 10.c By 2030, reduce to less than 3% the transaction costs of migrant remittances
and eliminate remittance corridors with costs higher than 5%
SDG 11 Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and
sustainable
SDG 13 Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts
SDG 16 Promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development,
provide access to justice for all and build effective, accountable and
inclusive institutions at all levels
Target 16.2 End abuse, exploitation, trafficking and all forms of violence and torture
against children
SDG 17 Strengthen the means of implementation and revitalize the global
partnership for sustainable development
Target 17.18 By 2020, enhance capacity-building support to developing countries,
including for LDCs and SIDS, to increase significantly the availability of
high-quality, timely and reliable data disaggregated by income, gender, age,
race, ethnicity, migratory status, disability, geographic location and other
characteristics relevant in national contexts
Source: Constructed by the authors using data from the Migration Data Portal, hosted by IOM’s Global
Migration Data Analysis Centre (GMDAC).
Migration and SDGs 23
This chapter builds on existing research to understand how two data initiatives –
one at the macro-level and the other at the micro-level contribute to SDGs and also
fill the existing data gap on international migration. UN DESA’s “Inquiry Among
Governments on Population and Development” (the “Inquiry”) – a data exercise
which began in 1963 has a module on International Migration which collects data
from national governments on various parameters such as immigration, emigration,
integration, naturalization and citizenship, irregular migration, diaspora investments
and remittances. Similarly, the Kerala Migration Survey (KMS) launched by the
Centre for Development Studies (CDS) at the subnational level since 1998 (KMS
completed two decades of its existence and finished its 8th round of surveys in 2018)
sought to collect data of over 15,000 households in Kerala on their socioeconomic
status, emigration, internal migration, return emigration and remittances. Among
the two surveys, UN DESA’s Twelfth Inquiry was subsequently repurposed in 2018
as a tool to monitor the SDG indicator 10.7.2. Through a critical commentary
and overview of both the approaches, the chapter aims to address the following
questions:
• What are the different kinds of data which are being collected and disseminated?
• What are the strengths and challenges of both the surveys?
• What are the lessons learnt and how can this inform the SDGs relevant to
migration, both at the local and global level?
Methodology
Primary data was collected through in-person and telephonic interviews with select
staff from UN DESA and CDS. Secondary data was collected through the review
of UN documents, UN websites and CDS Working Papers from 1998 to 2018. The
review and analysis of data were completed in 2019.
Macro-level analysis
Section I: Macro-level migration survey to monitor the SDG
Indicator 10.7.2
Introduction
Though there are multiple SDGs that relate to migration, the “explicit” migration-
related target is 10.7, which “calls on countries to facilitate orderly, safe, regular and
responsible migration and mobility of people, including through the implementa-
tion of planned and well-managed migration policies”(UN DESA and IOM, 2019,
6). In 2016, the Inter-agency and Expert Group on SDG Indicators (IAEG-SDGs)
tasked UN DESA and IOM to develop an indicator that “could be adopted as an
internationally-agreed standard for the global monitoring of SDG target 10.7”(UN
DESA and IOM, 2019, 7).
24 S. Irudaya Rajan and Ardra Manasi
In response to this demand, IOM and DESA (as “co-custodians”) jointly pro-
posed the SDG indicator 10.7.2 to shed light on “the number of countries with
migration policies to facilitate orderly, safe, regular and responsible migration and
mobility of people” (UN DESA and IOM, 2019, 6). The long-term goal of this
indicator is to understand and measure the state of national migration policies and
track how such policies change over time (UN DESA and IOM, 2019).
The methodology for developing the SDG indicator 10.7.2 spanned over a
period of two years, through a participatory process, which involved consultations
with UN Member States (UN DESA, IOM and OECD, 2019).The process was also
informed and influenced by other migration-related developments at the UN such
as the GCM and IOM’s Migration Governance Indicators (MGI).
migration and development and forced migration, reflecting the questions and sub-
categories within the six policy domains, as indicated in Table 2.2.
Collection of data
In 2018, the “Inquiry” was shared with the Permanent Missions of Member States
at the United Nations (UN) in New York, from where it was “redirected to relevant
line ministries or government departments” of respective countries (UN DESA
and IOM, 2019, 9). Both IOM and the Organization for Economic Co-operation
and Development (OECD) assisted in the follow-up with relevant ministries. The
macro-level survey was administered to 197 countries – 193 UN Member States,
2 Observer States (Holy See and the State of Palestine) and 2 Non-Member States
(the Cook Islands and Niue).As of September 2019, data on the SDG indicator
10.7.2 have been made “available for 111 countries, which is equivalent to 56 per-
cent of all countries globally” (UN DESA, IOM and OECD 2019, 2).
*****
*****
*****
———