Professional Documents
Culture Documents
28 Deck
28 Deck
28 Deck
Materials adopted:
Grade of Concrete =M 30
Grade of steel = Fe 415
scbc= 13.334 N/mm2
sst = 200 N/mm2
n= 0.401
j= 0.867
k= 2.318
Cross girders are provided at the supports and at the mid span
Distance between the C/L of the end and middle cross girders = 9 m
Distance between the C/L of the end amd middle longitudinal girders = 1.7 m
Aspect ratio = (l/b) = 5.295
Hence the deck slab shall be designed as one way slab
Load caculations:
Load due to self weight of the deck slab = 0.23 x 25
= 5 kN/m2
lo = Effective span
b1 = Breadth of the concentration area of load.(parallel to support)
lo = Effective span
b1 = Breadth of the concentration area of load.(parallel to support)
Contact length of the tyre shall be arrived based on the max. tyre pressures specified in IRC:6-2000
Maximum tyre pressure = 5.273 kg/cm2 (or) 0.5273 N/mm2
Actual max. Load = 5 t (or) 50000 N
Contact width of tyre = 360 mm
Contact length of tyre = 264 mm
Contact length of tyre = 264 mm
For Tyres 1, 4
a= 0.42 m
lo = 1.7 m
b1 = 264 + (2 x 75 )= 414 mm
a= 2.6
beff = 1.237 m
The effective width is overlapping, hence the beff = 2.457 m
For Tyres 2, 3
a= 0.19 m
lo = 1.7 m
b1 = 264 + (2 x 75 )= 414 mm
a= 2.6
beff = 0.853 m
The effective width is overlapping, hence the beff = 0.853 m
For Tyres 1, 2, 3, ,4
a= 0.735 m
lo = 1.7 m
b1 = 264 + (2 x 75 )= 414 mm
a= 2.6
beff = 1.499 m
The effective width is overlapping, hence the beff = 2.719 m
4. Class - A (2 Nos.)
Case -1: With minimum eccentricity:
Distance between two tyres of the axle = 1.8 m (C/C of tyres)
Spacing of Axle = 1.2 m
Load per axle = 114 kN
Load per tyre 57 kN
Width of tyre = 500 mm
Contact length of tyre = 250 mm
(or) 1.05 m
As per IRC:6, the impact factor of 50% shall be considered.
lo = 1.7 m
b1 = 250 + (2 x 75 )= 400 mm
a= 2.6
beff = 1.505 m
The effective width is overlapping, hence the beff = 2.705 m
Continuous beam analysis has been carried-out by using the structural analysis programe (STAAD)
by inputting the various loads calculated above on the beam members. The analysis results were
appended for ready reference.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Descritisation Diagram
1 3 5 6 8 10 11 13
2 4 7 9 12 14
1 2 3 4
Ctitical sections for design
Section Numbers
Load description 8 9 10 11 12
Self-weight 0.56 0.1 -0.64 0.26 0.77
SDL -0.79 -0.8 -0.49 0.36 0.67
Class-AA (case-1) 17.31 3.75 -29.15 -7.13 8.34
Class-AA (case-2) 1.56 -2.56 -8.79 4.39 10.37
Class-AA (case-3) 5.6 1.09 -5.09 0.87 5.32
Class-AA -T(case-1) 10..66 7.55 -1.37 -0.56 3.93
Class-AA -T(case-2) 1.27 -3.85 -9.82 5.57 11.91
Class-AA -T(case-3) 7.06 3.35 0.71 2.55 6.05
70R-Bogie(case-1) 11.95 7.22 -7.26 -2 5.05
70R-Bogie(case-2) 1.32 -3.85 -10 5.39 12.38
70R-Bogie(case-3) 11.54 4.7 -1.32 3.14 10.15
Class-A (case-1) 4.53 -1.67 -4.53 1.74 6.07
Class-A (case-2) 10.81 5.61 -5.97 2.19 6.49
Max. Hogging BM 17.08 6.85 -0.42 6.01 13.35
Max. Sagging BM 0 -4.55 -30.28 -6.51 0
Design of reinforcement :
For hogging moment:(at the face of the web)
Design hogging moment = 20.53 kNm
Overall depth provided = 375 mm
Effective depth availbale = 375 - 40 - 5
= 330 mm
Area of steel required = BM/sst x j x d
= 358.779 mm2/m
Hence, provide Y 10 bars @ 218 mm C/C
Max. hogging moment at other locations = 10.93 kNm
Area of steel required = BM/sst x j x d
= 409.309 mm2/m
Hence, provide Y 10 bars @ 191 mm C/C
Hence, OKAY
For distribution Reinforcement::
Design moment = 9.084 kNm
(0.3 times the maximum BM considered)
Area of steel required = BM/sst x j x d
= 361.294 mm2/m
Hence, provide Y 10 bars @ 217 mm C/C
Hence, provide Y 8 bars @ 150 mm C/C
Note: As per the IRC:21-2000, Shear need not be checked if the live load dispersions are
taken as per the dispersion width formula