Work-related asthma is not uncommon but may be less well known. There are many explanations for this. First, the relationship between asthma symptoms and work may not be obvious to patients. Second, a doctor may not think to ask specifically about any work-related symptoms. Third, a clinician may not feel confident in assessing work-related asthma. Lastly, there is limited information regarding occupational asthma and its causes in international asthma guidelines. There are two main types of work-related asthma. Occupational asthma is caused by exposure to air in the work environment. Meanwhile, in asthma that is exacerbated by work, various non-specific factors in the workplace can worsen asthma symptoms, but the asthma is not caused by work. The characteristics of these two conditions are not easy to distinguish from each other. Work-exacerbated asthma is common and is estimated to affect one-fifth of working asthma patients. Recognizing occupational asthma is challenging in many ways. For one thing, the observation that symptoms may worsen at work (or improve afterwards) may not be possible. In addition, work-related factors can cause asthma (either de novo or due to asthma) or can worsen pre-existing asthma symptoms. A clinician should consider the possibility of a diagnosis of occupational asthma in working-age patients who have new symptoms of asthma, reappearance of asthma in childhood, worsening of asthma control, or when unexplained airflow obstruction is detected (table 1). Suspicion will be higher if the patient works in a high-risk job or is exposed to asthma-causing agents at work (table 2). Based on the underlying mechanisms, there are two types of occupational asthma with different clinical features which are summarized in the following section and in table 3.
Severe asthma triggered by sensitizers
Occupational asthma triggered by sensitizers is considered the most common type of occupational asthma and is triggered by high molecular weight or low molecular weight agents . HMW agents are (glyco)proteins of animal, plant, or microbial origin, which have the ability to cause sensitization mediated by immunoglobulin (Ig) E. LMW agents are synthetic chemicals, metals, and other natural agents that are thought to cause immunological reactions , however specific IgE antibodies are often not detected (table 2). Occupational asthma triggered by sensitizers always requires repeated periods of exposure to the allergen before the onset of symptoms. It is during this “latent period” that sensitization and immunological responses develop. The latent period can vary from weeks to years, but the highest risk of developing asthma is in the first 2 years after exposure. Asthma symptoms that improve after leaving work also increase the likelihood of a diagnosis of occupational asthma, but the relationship between symptoms and work is not always clear. Some occupational asthma patients may report that their symptoms occur at work or while doing certain jobs, while others may experience more pronounced symptoms in the afternoon or evening, that is, outside the workplace. In addition, triggers outside of work, such as cigarette smoke, exercise, and cold air, can worsen existing symptoms. The pattern of overt work-related symptoms generally decreases with increasing duration of asthma. These features emphasize the importance of considering the possibility of occupational asthma, even when the patient experiences few symptoms at work and most symptoms outside the workplace. Occupational asthma caused by HMW agents is more common in people with atopy and almost always occurs in conjunction with occupational rhinitis and conjunctivitis. These symptoms may begin before, or at the same time as, asthma symptoms. Therefore, any patient with work-related upper or lower respiratory symptoms should raise clinical suspicion. Occupational asthma induced by LMW agents is less common in rhinitis, and usually has a delayed asthmatic response, especially compared with asthma induced by HMW agents.