Many countries use fossil fuels such as coal or oil as the main sources of energy.
However, in some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is
encouraged. Do you think this a positive or negative development? It is true that non-renewable sources of energy have been used by numerous nations. Nevertheless, in recent years, more and more countries are turning to carbon-free sources. I firmly believe that this trend is advantageous in environmental terms despite some initial financial difficulties. The primary reason for many authorities not adopting the alternative sources is the prohibitively expensive price. The cutting-edge technological advances used to harvest green energy such as sun panels or wind turbine generators is extremely costly and out of reach for the third world. Investing in these applications would put a strain on the government coffers, resulting in the reduction of other categories such as public welfare. However, the price setback is easily eclipsed by several merits that these new types of energy can bring about. First and foremost, motivation to switch to more sustainable energy is the deteriorating environment. It is evident that a variety of environmental problems stems from the combustion of fossil fuel. By contrast, the renewable sources left little, if any, carbon footprint. As a result, a more sustainable future can be secured if the world embraces these sources of energy. Second, humankind is becoming increasingly over-reliant on carbon-intensive sources, but these are not infinite. By the same token, alternative energy generators would be the answer to the energy crisis in the foreseeable future. To summarize, due to its upside, switching to greener sources of energy is unequivocally indispensable in spite of some challenges for developing nations. Therefore, the choice of alternative sources in many countries is a positive development.