Many countries use fossil fuels such as coal or oil as the main sources of energy.

However, in some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is

encouraged. Do you think this a positive or negative development?
It is true that non-renewable sources of energy have been used by numerous
nations. Nevertheless, in recent years, more and more countries are turning to
carbon-free sources. I firmly believe that this trend is advantageous in
environmental terms despite some initial financial difficulties.
The primary reason for many authorities not adopting the alternative sources is the
prohibitively expensive price. The cutting-edge technological advances used to
harvest green energy such as sun panels or wind turbine generators is extremely
costly and out of reach for the third world. Investing in these applications would
put a strain on the government coffers, resulting in the reduction of other
categories such as public welfare.
However, the price setback is easily eclipsed by several merits that these new types
of energy can bring about. First and foremost, motivation to switch to more
sustainable energy is the deteriorating environment. It is evident that a variety of
environmental problems stems from the combustion of fossil fuel. By contrast, the
renewable sources left little, if any, carbon footprint. As a result, a more
sustainable future can be secured if the world embraces these sources of energy.
Second, humankind is becoming increasingly over-reliant on carbon-intensive
sources, but these are not infinite. By the same token, alternative energy generators
would be the answer to the energy crisis in the foreseeable future.
To summarize, due to its upside, switching to greener sources of energy is
unequivocally indispensable in spite of some challenges for developing nations.
Therefore, the choice of alternative sources in many countries is a positive
development.