Moot Court Preposition

Sandeep and Anjali's marriage, initiated in New Delhi in 2000 under the Hindu Marriage Act,
1955, initially flourished as Anjali pursued her studies and Sandeep progressed in his career.
However, a significant turn came when Sandeep received a job offer in Silicon Valley, USA,
compelling the couple to relocate. Despite Anjali securing a local hospital residency, she
opted for a long-distance relationship, emphasizing the importance of her career. Meanwhile,
Anjali's aspirations to start a family clashed with Sandeep's concerns over financial stability
in their new setting. Eventually, they decided on surrogacy in India in 2010, engaging Priya
as a surrogate under the explicit agreement that Priya would have no future claims to the
child. Upon the premature birth of their daughter in 2014, Anjali returned to the USA, leaving
Sandeep in India to care for the infant. During this period, Sandeep's emotional bond with
Priya deepened, causing his attachment to Anjali to wane, leading to neglect on his part. An
attempt by Anjali to address the situation during a visit to India resulted in heightened
tensions and arguments. Subsequently, Sandeep filed for divorce, indicating the irreparable
breakdown of their relationship, while Priya, emotionally invested in the child, sought
custody. The central issues at hand involve Sandeep's eligibility for divorce and Anjali's
entitlement to either conjugal rights restitution or sole custody of the child.

STATEMENT OF ISSUES

1. Whether Mr. Sandeep Is Entitled to File for Divorce or not?

2. Whether Mrs. Anjali Is Entitled to File For Restitution Of Conjugal Rights or Sole Custody Of The
Child