Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ebook The Struggle For Democracy 2018 Elections and Updates Edition Edward S Greenberg Online PDF All Chapter
Ebook The Struggle For Democracy 2018 Elections and Updates Edition Edward S Greenberg Online PDF All Chapter
Ebook The Struggle For Democracy 2018 Elections and Updates Edition Edward S Greenberg Online PDF All Chapter
https://ebookmeta.com/product/malaysia-s-general-
elections-2018-understanding-the-rural-vote-1st-edition-serina-
rahman/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/the-struggle-for-development-and-
democracy-volume-1-new-approaches-1st-edition-alessandro-
olsaretti/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/democracy-elections-and-
constitutionalism-in-africa-1st-edition-charles-m-fombad/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/going-big-fdr-s-legacy-biden-s-new-
deal-and-the-struggle-to-save-democracy-1st-edition-robert-
kuttner/
CODE RED Computerized Elections and The War on American
Democracy Election 2020 Edition Jonathan David Simon
https://ebookmeta.com/product/code-red-computerized-elections-
and-the-war-on-american-democracy-election-2020-edition-jonathan-
david-simon/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/the-politics-of-transnational-
peasant-struggle-resistance-rights-and-democracy-1st-edition-
robin-dunford/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/growing-democracy-in-africa-
elections-accountable-governance-and-political-economy-1st-
edition-muna-ndulo/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/primary-mathematics-3a-hoerst/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/campaigns-elections-and-the-threat-
to-democracy-what-everyone-needs-to-know-2nd-edition-dennis-w-
johnson/
Revel enables students to read and interact with course Highlighting, note taking, and a glossary personalize
material on the devices they use, anywhere and anytime. the learning experience. Educators can add notes for
Responsive design allows students to access Revel on their students, too, including reminders or study tips
tablet devices, with content displayed clearly in both portrait
and landscape view.
Revel allows educators to indicate precisely which readings Revel lets educators monitor class assignment completion
must be completed on which dates. This clear, detailed and individual student achievement. It offers actionable
schedule helps students stay on task and keeps them information that helps educators intersect with their students
motivated throughout the course. in meaningful ways, such as points earned on quizzes and
time on task.
Updates Edition
This page intentionally left blank
Updates Edition
THE STRUGGLE
FOR DEMOCRACY
2018 Elections and Updates Edition
Edward S. Greenberg
University of Colorado, Boulder
Benjamin I. Page
Northwestern University
with assistance by
David Doherty
Loyola University Chicago
Scott L. Minkoff
SUNY New Paltz
Josh M. Ryan
Utah State University
Updates Edition
Executive Portfolio Manager: Jeff Marshall Digital Studio Course Producer: Tina Gagliostro
Content Producer: Mary Donovan Full-Service Project Manager: Lumina
Content Developer: Allison Collins Datamatics, Inc.
Portfolio Manager Assistant: Christina Winterburn Compositor: Lumina Datamatics, Inc.
Product Marketer: Candice Madden Printer/Binder: LSC Communications, Inc.
Field Marketer: Alexa Macri Cover Printer: LSC Communications, Inc.
Content Producer Manager: Amber Mackey Cover Design: Lumina Datamatics, Inc.
Content Development Manager: Rebecca Green Cover Credit: José Miguel Hernández Hernández/
Art/Designer: Lumina Datamatics, Inc. Moment Open/Getty Images
Acknowledgements of third party content appear on page 645, which constitutes an extension of this
copyright page.
Copyright © 2020, 2018, 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc. 221 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, or its
affiliates. All Rights Reserved. Printed in the United States of America. This publication is protected by
copyright, and permission should be obtained from the publisher prior to any prohibited r eproduction,
storage in a retrieval system, or transmission in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical,
photocopying, recording, or otherwise. For information regarding permissions, request forms and the
appropriate contacts within the Pearson Education Global Rights & Permissions department, please visit
www.pearsoned.com/permissions/.
PEARSON, ALWAYS LEARNING, and Revel are exclusive trademarks owned by Pearson Education, Inc.
or its affiliates, in the U.S., and/or other countries.
Unless otherwise indicated herein, any third-party trademarks that may appear in this work are the prop-
erty of their respective owners and any references to third-party trademarks, logos or other trade dress are
for demonstrative or descriptive purposes only. Such references are not intended to imply any sponsor-
ship, endorsement, authorization, or promotion of Pearson’s products by the owners of such marks, or any
relationship between the owner and Pearson Education, Inc. or its affiliates, authors, licensees or distributors.
Rental Edition
ISBN-10: 0-13-524642-3
ISBN-13: 978-0-13-524642-9
Updates Edition
Brief Contents
To the Student xv
To the Instructor xvii
PART II Structure
2 The Constitution 17
11 Congress 294
vii
Updates Edition
viii Brief Contents
Appendix 564
Glossary 592
Endnotes 604
Photo Credits 645
Index 647
Updates Edition
Contents
ix
Updates Edition
x Contents
Strong National Government: Spillover Effects and The People’s Attitudes About the Political
Competition 69 System 124
Using the Democracy Standard: American Federalism: The People’s Liberalism and Conservatism 128
How Democratic? 70 The People’s Policy Preferences 128
The People’s “Fitness to Rule” Revisited 132
4 The Structural Foundations of Using the Democracy Standard: Public Opinion: Does It
Determine What Government Does? 133
American Government and Politics 73
The Struggle for Democracy: The Walmartization of
American Manufacturing: Where Will All the
6 The News Media 137
Good Jobs Go? 74 The Struggle for Democracy: War with the
America’s Population 76 Watchdog 138
America’s Population Is Growing 76 How News Organizations Operate 139
America’s Population Is Becoming More Diverse 77 The Functions of the News Media in a Democracy 139
America’s Population Is Moving West and South 81 News Media Organizations 140
America’s Population Is Growing Older 82 Profit Motives of the News Media 142
America’s Population Is Becoming Economically News-Gathering and Production Operations 144
More Unequal 82 Online News Media 150
America’s Economy 87 Bias in the News 155
Main Tendencies of Capitalism 88 Ideological Bias 155
Globalization, Technological Change, and Nonideological Bias 157
Hypercompetition 89
Effects of the News Media on Politics 158
America’s Political Culture 93
Agenda Setting 158
Individualistic 94
Priming 159
Distrustful of Government 96
Framing 159
Believers in Democracy and Freedom 96
Fueling Cynicism 160
Populist 97
Fragmenting Comprehension 160
Religious 97
Using the Democracy Standard: The News Media:
Using the Democracy Standard: American Society, Do They Help or Hinder Democracy 162
Economy, and Political Culture: How Democratic? 100
Updates Edition
Contents xi
Updates Edition
xii Contents
Using the Democracy Standard: Voting, Campaigns, The Framers’ Conception of the Presidency 335
and Elections: Do Voting, Campaigns, and Elections The Dormant Presidency 336
Make Government Leaders Listen to the People? 291
The Twentieth Century Transformation 337
How Important Are Individual Presidents? 341
PART IV Government and Governing The Powers and Roles of the President 342
Chief of State 342
11 Congress 294 Domestic Policy Leader 342
Chief Executive 344
The Struggle for Democracy: The 2018 Midterm Foreign Policy and Military Leader 346
Elections: Democrats Take Back the House But Lose
Party Leader 349
Ground in the Senate 295
The President’s Support System 350
Constitutional Foundations of Congress 296
The White House Staff 350
Enumerated and Implied Powers of Congress 296
The Executive Office of the President 351
Constraints on Congress 296
The Vice Presidency 352
Basis for Representation in Congress 298
The Cabinet 353
Is Congress Still Capable of Solving Big Problems? 298
The President and Congress: Perpetual Tug-of-War 354
Representation and Democracy in Congress 300
Conflict by Constitutional Design 354
Two Styles of Representation 300
What Makes a President Successful
Member Demographics 301
with Congress? 355
Representation in the House: Reapportionment
The President and the People 357
and Redistricting 303
Getting Closer to the People 358
Representation in the Senate 307
Leading Public Opinion 358
How Representative Is Congress? A Look Back
at the Arguments 307 Responding to the Public 359
Congressional Elections 307 Presidential Popularity 359
The Congressional Election Process 308 Using the Democracy Standard: The Presidency:
Presidents and the American People 361
Who Runs for Congress? 308
Money and Congressional Elections 309
The Incumbency Factor 311 13 The Executive Branch 364
Do Congressional Elections Ensure
Proper Representation? 312 The Struggle for Democracy: A Changing
The Congressional Legislative Process 313 Bureaucracy 365
Introducing a Bill 315 How the Executive Branch Is Organized 366
Referral to Committee 315 Cabinet-Level Departments 367
The Rules Committee 316 Independent Regulatory Commissions 369
Floor Action on a Bill 316 Independent Executive Agencies 369
Resolving Bicameral Differences 319 Other Federal Bureaucracies 371
Presidential Action on a Bill 320 What Do Bureaucracies and Bureaucrats Do? 371
Party and Leader Influences on the Executing Programs and Policies 371
Passage Process 320 Exercising Discretion 372
Voting in Congress 323 Regulating 372
Procedural and Substantive Votes 323 Adjudicating 373
Partisan Polarization and Party-Line Discretion and Democracy 374
Voting in Congress 323
Who Are the Bureaucrats? 374
Congressional Oversight of the Executive Branch 325 The Merit System 375
Nominee Confirmations 326 Political Appointees 376
Hearings and Investigations 326 How Different Are Civil Servants from
Impeachment 327 Other Americans? 378
Using the Democracy Standard: Congress: Is Congress Political and Governmental Influences on
Out of Touch with the American People? 328 Bureaucratic Behavior 378
The President and the Bureaucracy 378
12 The Presidency 332 Congress and the Bureaucracy 380
The Courts and the Bureaucracy 382
The Struggle for Democracy: The Presidency 333 The Public and Press and the Bureaucracy 383
The Expanding Presidency 334 Interest Groups and the Bureaucracy 384
Updates Edition
Contents xiii
Updates Edition
xiv Contents
Appendix 564
18 Foreign and National Defense
Glossary 592
Policies 529
Endnotes 604
The Struggle for Democracy: The Syrian Nightmare 530
Photo Credits 645
Foreign and National Security Policies and
Democracy 532 Index 647
Updates Edition
To the Student
W
hy study American government and politics, and why read this text-
book to do it? Here’s why: Only by understanding how our complex
political system operates and how government works can you play a role
in deciding what government does. Only by understanding the obstacles that stand
in your way as you enter the political fray, as well as the abundant opportunities you
have to advance your ideas and values in the political process, can you play an effec-
tive role.
You can learn this best, we believe, by studying what political scientists have dis-
covered about American politics and government. Political science is the systematic
study of the role that people and groups play in determining what government does;
how government goes about implementing its policy decisions; and what social, eco-
nomic, and political consequences flow from government actions. The best political
science research is testable, evidence-based, and peer-reviewed—as free as possible
from ideological and partisan bias as it can be.
The Struggle for Democracy not only introduces you to that research but also gives
you tools to decode the American political system, analyze its pieces, consider its link-
ages, and identify opportunities to make a difference. A simple but powerful frame-
work will guide you in discovering how government, politics, and the larger society
are intertwined and how government policies are a product of the interactions of
actors and institutions across these domains.
Our hope and expectation is that The Struggle for Democracy will enable your suc-
cess in your introduction to American government and politics course. But we are
interested in more than your classroom experiences. We believe that knowing how
politics and government work and how closely they conform to our democratic values
will also enable a lifetime of productive choices. Put all naïveté aside, however. Mak-
ing a mark on public policies is never easy. Like-minded individuals need to do more
than vote. Those who gain the most from government policies have, after all, substan-
tial resources to make certain that government treats them well.
But you have resources to make changes, too. Beyond voting, opportunities for
affecting change may come from your involvement in political campaigns, from using
social media to persuade others of your views or to organize meetings and demon-
strations, from participating in social movements, from contributing to groups and
politicians who share your views, and from many more such avenues. So, much like
waging war, making your voice heard requires that you know the “lay of the land,”
including the weapons you have at your disposal (we would call them political tools)
and the weapons of those arrayed against you. But, much like peacemaking, you need
to know how and when compromises can be reached that serve the interests of all
parties.
Lest all of the above seems too daunting, we also have tried to make this book
enjoyable, accessible, and fun. If your experience in reading The Struggle for Democracy
comes close to the pleasure we had in writing it, we have come as near as possible to
achieving our goal.
xv
Updates Edition
xvi To the Student
Updates Edition
To the Instructor
B
en Page and I decided to write this book because, as instructors in intro-
ductory American government courses, we could not find a book that pro-
vided students with usable tools for critically analyzing our political system
and making judgments about how well our government works. The Struggle for Democ-
racy does not simply present facts about government and politics—it also provides
several analytical and normative frameworks for putting the flood of facts we ask our
students to absorb into a more comprehensible form. By doing so, I believe we have
made it easier and more satisfying for instructors to teach the introductory course.
Our goal all along was to create a textbook that treats students as adults, engages
their intellectual and emotional attention, and encourages them to be active learners.
Every element in this text is designed to promote the kind of critical thinking skills
scholars and instructors believe students need to become the engaged, active, and
informed citizens that are so vital to any democracy. Over the next several sections, I
show the elements we created to meet these objectives.
Features
Approach The Struggle for Democracy provides several analytical and normative
frameworks for putting the flood of facts teachers ask their students to absorb into
a more comprehensible form. Although all topics that are common and expected in
the introductory American government and politics course are covered in this text-
book, the two main focal points—an analytical framework for understanding how
politics and government work and the normative question “How democratic are we?”
(addressed in concluding remarks at the end of each chapter under the “Using the
Democracy Standard” headline)—allow for a fresh look at traditional topics.
This book pays great attention to structural factors—which include the American
economy, social and demographic change in the United States, technological innova-
tions and change, the American political culture, and changes in the global system—
and examines how they affect politics, government, and public policy. These factors
are introduced in Chapter 4—a chapter unique among introductory texts—and they
are brought to bear on a wide range of issues in subsequent chapters.
The Struggle for Democracy attends very carefully to issues of democratic political
theory. This follows from a critical thinking objective, which asks students to assess
the progress of, and prospects for, democracy in the United States and from a desire
to present American history as the history of the struggle for democracy. For instance,
Struggle examines how the evolution of the party system has improved democracy in
some respects in the United States, but hurt it in others.
Struggle also includes more historical perspective because it provides the necessary
context for thinking comprehensively and critically about contemporary political
debates. It shows, for example, how the expansion of civil rights in the United States is
tied to important historical events and trends.
Comparisons of developments, practices, and institutions in the United States
with those in other nations add another dimension to our understanding. We can bet-
ter comprehend how our system of social welfare works, for example, when we see
how other rich democratic countries deal with the problems of poverty, unemploy-
ment, and old age.
xvii
Updates Edition
xviii To the Instructor
PEDAGOGY The Struggle for Democracy offers unique features that help students bet-
ter understand, interpret, and critically evaluate American politics and government.
Updates Edition
To the Instructor xix
• Substantial coverage of the contentious 2018 national midterm elections with spe-
cial attention to the partisan aspects of the election in Chapter 9, the voting and
campaign aspects in Chapter 10, the consequences for Congress in Chapter 11,
and the impact on the presidency in Chapter 12.
• Coverage throughout, but especially in Chapters 3, 10, 14, 15, 16, and 17, on
important rulings by the Supreme Court on religious liberty, LGBTQ rights, con-
gressional district gerrymandering, voting rights, and presidential powers.
• Consideration, especially in Chapter 12, “The Presidency,” and Chapter 18, “For-
eign Policy and National Defense,” on the changing relationships with America’s
traditional allies, efforts to tame the nuclear weapons and missile programs in
North Korea and Iran, China’s emergence as a competing world power, and Rus-
sia’s growing military aggressiveness in Europe and the Middle East, as well as its
continuing interference in the politics of democratic countries.
• Increased attention to the growing partisan bitterness in Washington and across
much of the nation that affects how government addresses or fails to address vir-
tually every major problem facing the nation whether it be energy, illegal immigra-
tion, climate change, or the shrinking middle class (Chapters 5, 9, 10, 11, and 17).
• Questions of whether and to what degree income and wealth inequality has
increased, and if it has, with what political and public policy consequences were
thoroughly considered during this revision. We also look closely at globaliza-
tion and technological change and their impact on Americans, with extensive
research and analysis of particular note evident in Chapters 4 and 18.
• The ways in which social, economic, and technological trends shape government
action are also considered, including executive orders increasing border security,
tightening immigration asylum processing, intensifying the expulsion of undocu-
mented immigrants, and rolling back financial industry and environmental regu-
lations (Chapters 4, 15, 17, and 18).
• Photos in this edition were selected not only to capture major events from the
last few years but to illustrate the relevancy of politics in our daily lives. They
show political actors and processes as well as people affected by politics, creating
a visual narrative that enhances rather than repeats the text. Each includes critical
thinking questions that allow readers to engage with the material more intensely.
• The data in all of the figures and tables have been updated throughout with the
intention of helping users think critically not only about political decisions in ret-
rospect but also about pending government action.
Revel™
Revel is an interactive learning environment that deeply engages students and pre-
pares them for class. Media and assessment integrated directly within the authors’
narrative lets students read, explore interactive content, and practice in one continu-
ous learning path. Thanks to the dynamic reading experience in Revel, students come
to class prepared to discuss, apply, and learn from instructors and from each other.
Updates Edition
xx To the Instructor
• Captivating videos bring to life chapter content and key moments in American
government. Videos are incorporated into the chapters, where pertinent, and can
also be easily accessed from the instructor’s Resources folder within Revel.
• ABC News footage and Smithsonian short documentary videos provide exam-
ples from both current and historical events. Examples of footage include FDR
visiting the newly completed Boulder Dam (Hoover Dam), an NRA lobbyist’s
proposition to put guns in schools one week after the Sandy Hook tragedy,
important events in African Americans’ struggle for equality, how war and the
preparation for war increased the role of the federal government, and President
Obama’s struggle to make a case for air strikes in Syria.
• Pearson Originals for Political Science are compelling stories about contempo-
rary issues. These short-form documentaries contextualize the complex social
and political issues impacting the world today. In addition to helping students
better understand core concepts, Pearson Originals inspire students to think
critically as empowered citizens who can inspire social and political change.
Explaining complex political issues in a simplified and entertaining way, Pearson
Originals for Political Science help students become informed members of society.
Videos in these short-form documentary series include Marijuana and Feder-
alism: Who’s in Charge?; Who Should Be Allowed to Call Themselves “Amer-
ican”?; and What Is the Emoluments Clause and Why Should I Care About It?
• Pearson’s Politics Hidden in Plain Sight video series does exactly that—pro-
vides students with concrete examples of how politics influences the activi-
ties of their daily lives—from using their cellphones to going to a convenience
store—in ways they likely had not previously noticed.
Updates Edition
To the Instructor xxi
• Shared Media activities all allow instructors to assign and grade both pre-written
and their own prompts that incorporate video, weblinks, and visuals and ask stu-
dents to respond in a variety of formats, in writing or by uploading their own
video or audio responses. Pre-written assignments around the Pearson Originals
for Political Science videos are available.
• Interactive maps, figures, and tables featuring innovative Social Explorer tech-
nology allow for inputting the latest data, toggling to illustrate movement over
time, and clicking on hot spots with pop-ups of images and captions. Examples
include Figure 12.2: Trends in Presidential Job Approval, 1946–2018 (line graph);
Figure 9.2: Presidential Elections, 1960 and 2012 (map); and Figure 11.2: Women
and Minorities in the U.S. Congress (bar chart).
Updates Edition
xxii To the Instructor
Updates Edition
To the Instructor xxiii
• Shared writing prompts, following each chapter’s Conclusion and Review sec-
tion, encourage students to consider how to address the challenges described
in the chapter in an essay format. For example, in Chapter 3, students must
argue for or against the proposition that the federal government should not
provide funds to support large infrastructure projects, such as the construction
and expansion of interstate highways. Through these shared writing prompts,
instructors and students can address multiple sides of an issue by sharing their
own views and responding to each other’s viewpoints.
• Essay prompts are from Pearson’s Writing Space, where instructors can assign
both automatically graded and instructor-graded prompts. Writing Space
is the best way to develop and assess concept mastery and critical thinking
through writing. Writing Space provides a single place within Revel to create,
track, and grade writing assignments; access writing resources; and exchange
meaningful, personalized feedback quickly and easily to improve results. For
students, Writing Space provides everything they need to keep up with writ-
ing assignments, access assignment guides and checklists, write or upload
completed assignments, and receive grades and feedback—all in one con-
venient place. For educators, Writing Space makes assigning, receiving, and
evaluating writing assignments easier. It’s simple to create new assignments
and upload relevant materials, see student progress, and receive alerts when
students submit work. Writing Space makes students’ work more focused and
effective, with customized grading rubrics they can see and personalized
feedback. Writing Space can also check students’ work for improper citation
or plagiarism by comparing it against the world’s most accurate text compar-
ison database available from Turnitin.
• Learning Management Systems Pearson provides Blackboard Learn™,
Canvas™, Brightspace by D2L, and Moodle integration, giving institutions,
instructors, and students easy access to Revel. Our Revel integration deliv-
ers streamlined access to everything your students need for the course in these
learning management system (LMS) environments. Single Sign-on: With single
sign-on, students are ready on their first day. From your LMS course, students
have easy access to an interactive blend of authors’ narrative, media, and assess-
ment. Grade Sync: Flexible, on-demand grade synchronization capabilities allow
you to control exactly which Revel grades should be transferred to the LMS
gradebook.
• Revel Combo Card The Revel Combo Card provides an all-in-one access code
and loose-leaf print reference (delivered by mail).
Updates Edition
xxiv To the Instructor
Supplements
Make more time for your students with instructor resources that offer effective learn-
ing assessments and classroom engagement. Pearson’s partnership with educators
does not end with the delivery of course materials; Pearson is there with you on the
first day of class and beyond. A dedicated team of local Pearson representatives will
work with you to not only choose course materials but also integrate them into your
class and assess their effectiveness. Our goal is your goal—to improve instruction
with each semester.
Pearson is pleased to offer the following resources to qualified adopters of The
Struggle for Democracy. Several of these supplements are available to instantly download
on the Instructor Resource Center (IRC); please visit the IRC at www.pearsonhighered
.com/irc to register for access.
TEST BANK Evaluate learning at every level. Reviewed for clarity and accuracy, the
Test Bank measures this book’s learning objectives with multiple choice, true/false,
fill-in-the-blank, short answer, and essay questions. You can easily customize the
assessment to work in any major learning management system and to match what is
covered in your course. Word, BlackBoard, and WebCT versions available on the IRC
and Respondus versions available upon request from www.respondus.com.
LIVESLIDES Social Explorers are data-rich interactive maps and figures that enable
students to visually explore demographic data to understand how local trends impact
them while improving data and statistical literacy. LiveSlides are dynamic lecture
slides, which give you a direct path to all the Social Explorers within your Revel
course. Available within Revel and on the IRC.
Acknowledgments
Heartfelt thanks and gratitude go to Ben Page, friend and long-time collaborator, who
co-authored many editions of this book, though not this one. For over a year after I
first broached the idea about our doing a textbook together, we hashed out whether
it was possible to write a textbook that would be consistent with our standards as
teachers and scholars, offer a perspective on American government and politics that
was unique in the discipline, and do well in the marketplace. Once we concluded that
it was possible to produce a textbook that hit these benchmarks and that we passion-
ately wanted to make happen, we spent more than two years writing what became
the First Edition of The Struggle for Democracy. When Ben and I started this process, we
were only acquaintances. Over the years, in the process of collaborating on the publi-
cation of several editions of this textbook, we became and remain very good friends.
Updates Edition
To the Instructor xxv
Though Ben has not been an active co-author on this edition of Struggle, his brilliant
insights, analytical approach, and elegant writing are visible on virtually every page,
and it is why his name sits next to mine on the cover and the title page. Ben Page, of
course, is one of the most brilliant, cited, visible, and admired political scientists in the
world, and hardly needs additional praise from me. But, I will say that I feel extraordi-
narily lucky to have worked with him for a good part of my academic career.
This edition of Struggle has been refreshed by and has benefited from the work of
three extremely talented and energetic young political scientists, all former teaching
assistants of mine in the large introductory course on American government and pol-
itics at the University of Colorado, Boulder, and all now launched on their own aca-
demic careers as teachers and scholars. David Doherty of Loyola University C hicago,
Josh Ryan of Utah State University, and Scott Minkoff of SUNY New Paltz, took on
a substantial portion of the burden of producing this new edition of Struggle, each
taking responsibility for updating three chapters and each responsible for creating or
modernizing chapter features that make this book such an exciting tool for student
learning. I am grateful to each of them and hope and trust we will work together on
future editions.
I also want to thank the many students, teaching assistants, and faculty at the
University of Colorado and other universities, colleges, and two-year institutions who
have used this book over the years as a learning and teaching tool and who have let
me know what worked and what didn’t work in previous editions. I appreciate their
insight and candor.
My thanks also go to my editor at Pearson Higher Education, Jeff Marshall, who
has been a champion of this book and my principal guide into the brave new world
of textbooks in the digital age. To Jeff and to all of his very smart and very capable
colleagues at Pearson, I express my very special appreciation. Allison Collins, our
developmental editor, who heroically kept David, Josh, Scott, and me on track, offered
compelling suggestions for content updates, helped with everything from photo selec-
tion to the design of line art, and acted as liaison with the many people involved in the
complex process of getting this book out the door and into the hands of teachers and
students. My thanks also go to Anju Joshi and her team at Lumina Datamatics; Megan
Vertucci, Jennifer Jacobson, and Rebecca Green at Ohlinger Studios; the magnificent
team at Social Explorer; and Tara Cook at Metrodigi. The shrewd and judicious con-
tributions of these individuals to the production of Struggle are apparent on every
printed page and on every digital screen.
Thanks go to John Aughenbaugh, of Virginia Commonwealth University, Leslie
Baker, of Mississippi State University, Anita Chadha, of the University of Houston,
Downtown, Lisa Iyer, of Riverside City College, Stephanie Paul, of the University of
Alabama, and Kevin Wagner, of Florida Atlantic University, who reviewed our work
and supplied insights and expertise on this revision.
We also wish to thank the many professors who gave their time to provide invalu-
able input during the following conferences and Pearson events:
Updates Edition
xxvi To the Instructor
Robinson, Houston Baptist University; Cessna Winslow, Tarleton State; Carrie Cur-
rier, Texas Christian University; Paul Jorgensen, University of Texas Rio Grande Val-
ley; Steve Lem, Kutztown University; Meng Lu, Sinclair Community College; James
Pearn, Southern State Community College; Blake Farrar, Texas State University; Carlin
Barmada, NVCC; Michael Chan, California State University, Long Beach; Mehwish,
SUNY Buffalo State; Daniel Tirone, Louisiana State University; Richard Haesly, Cali-
fornia State University, Long Beach; Hyung Park, El Paso Community College; Jesse
Kapenga, UTEP; Stephanie A. Slocum−Schaffer, Shepherd University; Augustine
Hammond, Augusta University; Shawn Easley, Cuyahoga Community College; D arius
Smith, Community College of Aurora; Robert Glover, University of Maine; Carolyn
Cocca, State University of NY, College at Old Westbury; Benjamin Arah, Bowie State
University; Ahmet Turker, Pima Community College; Eric Loepp, UW−Whitewater;
Holly Lindamod, University of North Georgia; Denise Robles, San Antonio College;
Asslan Khaligh, A lamo−San Antonio College; Brandy Martinez, San Antonio
College; Andrew Sanders, Texas A&M University, San Antonio; Mohsen Omar,
Northeast Lakeview College; Heather Frederick, Slippery Rock University; Heather
Rice, Slippery Rock University; Leslie Baker, Mississippi State University; Jamie
Warner, Marshall University; Will Jennings, University of Tennessee; Arjun B anerjee,
University of Tennessee, Knoxville; Jonathan Honig, University of Tennessee;
Rachel Fuentes, University of Tennessee, Knoxville; Andrew Straight, University of
Tennessee, Knoxville; Margaret Choka, Pellissippi State Community College; Christo-
pher Lawrence, Middle Georgia State University; LaTasha Chaffin, College of Charles-
ton; Jeff Worsham, West Virginia University; Cigdem Sirin−Villalobos, University of
Texas at El Paso; Lyle Wind, Suffolk Community College; Marcus Holmes, College
of William & Mary; Kurt Guenther, Palm Beach State College; Kevin Wagner, Florida
Atlantic University; Eric Sands, Berry College; Shari MacLachlan, Palm Beach State
College; Sharon Manna, North Lake College; Tamir Sukkary, American River College;
Willie Hamilton, Mt. San Jacinto College; Linda Trautman, Ohio University−Lancaster;
Dr. William H, Kraus, Motlow State Community College; Kim Winford, Blinn
College; Lana Obradovic, University of Nebraska at Omaha; Doug Schorling, College
of the Sequoias; Sarah Lischer, Wake Forest University; Ted Clayton, Central Michigan
University; Steven Greene, North Carolina State University; Sharon Navarro, University
of Texas at San Antonio; Curtis Ogland, San Antonio College; Henry Esparza, UT San
Antonio; Mario Salas, UTSA; Robert Porter, Ventura College; Will Jennings, University of
Tennessee; Haroon Khan, Henderson State University; Brenda Riddick, Houston Com-
munity College; Julie Lantrip, T arrant County College; Kyle C. Kopko, Elizabethtown
College; Kristine Mohajer, Austin Community College (ACC); Dovie D. Dawson, Central
Texas College; Joycelyn Caesar, Cedar Valley College; Daniel Ponder, Drury University
Updates Edition
To the Instructor xxvii
APSA 2017 Jooeun Kim, Georgetown; Leonard L. Lira, San José State University;
Abigail Post, University of Virginia; Jamilya Ukudeeva, Chabot College; Shannon
Jenkins, University of Massachusetts–Dartmouth; Matthew Platt, Morehouse College;
Sara Angevine, Whittier College; Andy Aoki, Augsburg University; Stephen Meinhold,
University of North Carolina–Wilmington; Manoutchehr Eskandari−Qajar, Santa
Barbara City College; Clayton Thyne, University of Kentucky; Alice Jackson, Morgan
State University; Mark Rom, Georgetown University; Krista Wiegand, U niversity of
Tennessee; Geoffrey Wallace, University of Washington; Precious Hall, Truckee Mead-
ows Community College; Patrick Larue, University of Texas at Dallas; Margot Morgan,
Indiana University Southeast; Patrick Wohlfarth, University of Maryland; Christian
Grose, University of Southern California; Clinton Jenkins, George Washington Uni-
versity; Jeffrey W. Koch, US Air Force Academy and SUNY Geneseo; Albert Ponce,
Diablo Valley College; Justin Vaughn, Boise State University; Joe Weinberg, University
of Southern Mississippi; Cindy Stavrianos, Gonzaga University; Kevan M. Yenerall,
Clarion University; Katherine Barbieri, University of South Carolina; Elsa Dias,
Metropolitan State University of Denver; Maria Gabryszewska, Florida International
University; Erich Saphir, Pima Community College; Mzilikazi Kone, College of the
Desert; Mary McHugh, Merrimack College; Joel Lieske, Cleveland State University;
Joseph W. Roberts, Roger Williams University; Eugen L. Nagy, Central Washington
University; Henry B. Sirgo, McNeese State University; Brian Newman, Pepperdine
University; Bruce Stinebrickner, DePauw U niversity; Amanda Friesen, IUPUI; LaTasha
Chaffin, College of Charleston; Richard Waterman, University of Kentucky
MPSA 2018 Adam Bilinski, Pittsburg State University; Daniel Chand, Kent State
University; Agber Dimah, Chicago State University; Yu Ouyang, Purdue University
Northwest; Steven Sylvester, Utah Valley University; Ben Bierly, Joliet Junior College;
Mahalley Allen, California State University, Chico; Christian Goergen, College of
DuPage; Patrick Stewart, University of Arkansas, Fayettville; Richard Barrett, Mount
Mercy University; Daniel Hawes, Kent State University; Niki Kalaf−Hughes, Bowling
Green State University; Gregg R. Murray, Augusta University; Ryan Reed, Bradley
University; Kimberly Turner, College of DuPage; Peter Wielhouwer, Western Michigan
University; Leena Thacker Kumar, University of Houston−DTN; Debra Leiter, Uni-
versity of Missouri Kansas City; Michael Makara, University of Central Missouri; Ola
Adeoye, University of Illinois–Chicago; Russell Brooker, Alverno College; Dr. Royal G.
Cravens, Bowling Green State University; Vincent T. Gawronski, Birmingham−Southern
College; Benjamin I. Gross, Jacksonville State University; Matthew Hitt, U
niversity of
Northern Colorado; Megan Osterbur, New England College; Pamela Schaal, Ball State
University; Edward Clayton, Central Michigan University; Ali Masood, California
State University, Fresno; Joel Lieske, Cleveland State University; Patrick Wohlfarth,
University of Maryland; Steven Greene, NC State; Will Jennings, University of
Tennessee; Haroon Khan, Henderson State University; Kyle Kopko, Elizabethtown
College; Hyung Lae Park, El Paso Community College; Linda Trautman, Ohio
University–Lancaster
Updates Edition
This page intentionally left blank
Updates Edition
CHAPTER
1
AT LONG LAST, THE RIGHT TO VOTE
The 1965 Voting Rights Act allowed
African Americans in the Deep South
to vote for the first time without fear.
In this photo from the period, African
Americans wait to enter the Haywood
County Courthouse to register to vote,
unimpeded by the brutalities and
humiliations of Jim Crow. Passage
of the act, an example of the struggle
for democracy at work in American
politics, put an end to a long history of
refusing to protect the voting rights of
minorities.
Do measures such as voter ID requirements
for voting, recently implemented in a
number of states, and which mostly affect
the youngest and oldest voters, rural
people, and racial and ethnic minorities,
suggest that the struggle for democracy
must continue? Or does it mean that our
democracy has matured and we no longer
need worry about access to the voting
booth?
DEMOCRACY AND
AMERICAN POLITICS
CHAPTER OUTLINE AND LEARNING OBJECTIVES
WHAT IS DEMOCRACY?
1.1 Explain democracy as the standard by which American government
and politics can be evaluated.
Updates Edition
2 Chapter 1
Although the right to vote is fundamental to democracy, African Americans in the South were
not able to vote in any numbers until after 1965, despite passage of the Fifteenth Amendment in
1870, which prohibited discrimination in voting on the basis of race, color, or previous condition
of servitude.
In Mississippi in the early 1960s, only 5 percent of African Americans were registered to vote,
and none held elective office. In Walthall County, not a single African American was registered,
although roughly three thousand were eligible.1 A combination of exclusionary voting registration
rules, economic pressures, hard and stubborn racial discrimination, and violence kept them from
the polls.
When the Student Non-Violent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) launched its Voter Education
Project in 1961 with the aim of ending black political powerlessness in the Deep South, its first
step was to create “freedom schools” in the segregated counties of Mississippi, Alabama, and
Georgia. The first freedom school was founded in McComb, Mississippi, by a remarkable young
man named Robert Parris Moses. Shrugging off repeated threats to his life, vicious assaults,
arrests, fines, and public recriminations, Moses taught African American citizens about their
rights under the law and sent them in droves to county registrars’ offices.
Despite the voter registration efforts of Moses and other SNCC volunteers, African Americans in
the Deep South would have to wait four more years—for the passage of the 1965 Voting Rights
Act—to exercise their constitutional right to elect representatives to govern in their names. 2 The
Voter Education Project, a key building block of a powerful and growing civil rights movement,
along with many moral and political acts of defiance, did eventually force federal action to sup-
port the citizenship rights of African Americans in the South. Robert Moses and many other
African Americans were willing to risk all they had, including their lives, to gain full and equal
citizenship in the United States. They would, most assuredly, have been gratified by the election
of Barack Obama in 2008 as the nation’s forty-fourth president.
* * * * *
The struggle for democracy is happening in many countries today, where people often fight
against all odds for the right to govern themselves and to control their own destinies even as
the rise of authoritarian nationalism in places such as Hungary, Poland, and Turkey has made
their efforts more difficult.3 In the United States, democracy, although honored and celebrated,
remains an unfinished project and may even be threatened. The continuing struggle to protect
and expand democracy is a major feature of American history and a defining characteristic of our
politics today. It is also a central theme of this book.
WHAT IS DEMOCRACY?
1.1 Explain democracy as the standard by which American government and
politics can be evaluated.
Why should there not be a patient confidence in the ultimate justice of the people? Is
there any better, or equal, hope in the world?
—Abraham Lincoln, First Inaugural Address
anarchist Anarchists believe that people can live in harmony without any form of authority;
One who believes that people are natu-
however, most people believe that when living together in groups and communities,
ral cooperators capable of creating free
and decent societies without the need there is a need for an entity of some sort to provide law and order; to protect against
for government. external aggressors; and to provide essential public goods such as roads, waste
Updates Edition
Democracy and American Politics 3
disposal, education, and clean water. It is safe to say that most people do not want
to live in places where there is effectively no government to speak of, as in Somalia,
or where there is a failed state, as in Haiti and Yemen. If government is both neces-
sary and inevitable, certain questions are unavoidable: Who is to govern? How are
those who govern encouraged to serve the best interests of society? How can gov-
ernments be induced to make policies and laws that citizens consider legitimate and
worth obeying? How can citizens ensure that those who govern carry out both laws
and policies that the people want and do so effectively? In short, what is the best form
of government? For a majority of Americans, the answer is clear: democracy.
Democracy’s central idea is that ordinary people want to rule themselves and
are capable of doing so.4 This idea has proved enormously popular, not only with
Americans, but with people all over the world.5 To be sure, some people would give
top priority to other things besides self-government as a requirement for good soci-
ety, including such things as safety and security, the widespread availability of good
jobs, or the need to have religious law and values determine what government does.
Nevertheless, the appealing notion that ordinary people can and should rule them-
selves has spread to all corners of the globe, and the number of people living in dem-
ocratic societies increased significantly for several decades6 until its recent setbacks
in countries such as Hungary, Poland, Turkey, and Venezuela where more autocratic
governments have come to power, and in the United states and Western Europe where
disillusionment with democracy has increased some.7
It is no wonder that a form of government based on the notion that people are
capable of ruling themselves has enjoyed widespread popularity, especially com-
pared with government by the few (by the Communist Party in China and in Cuba,
for example) or by a single person (by dictator Kim Jong-un in North Korea). Some
political thinkers argue that democracy is the form of government that best protects
human rights because it is the only one based on a recognition of the intrinsic worth
and equality of human beings. Others believe that democracy is the form of gov-
ernment most likely to produce rational policies because it can count on the pooled
knowledge and expertise of a society’s entire population: a political version, if you
will, of the wisdom of crowds, something like the wiki phenomenon.8 Still others
claim that democracies are more stable and long-lasting because their leaders, elected
by and answerable to voters, enjoy a strong sense of legitimacy among citizens. Many
others suggest that democracy is the form of government most conducive to eco-
nomic growth and material well-being, a claim with substantial scholarly support.9
(In the years ahead, the relative economic growth of India, a democracy, and China, a
one-party-state, will be a real-world test of this proposition.) Still others believe that
democracy is the form of government under which human beings, because they are
free, are best able to develop their natural capacities and talents.10 There are many
compelling reasons, then, why so many people have preferred democracy.
Americans have supported the idea of self-government and have helped make
the nation more democratic over the course of its history.11 Nevertheless, democracy in
America remains an aspiration rather than a finished product. The goal behind this book
is to help you think carefully about the quality and progress of democracy in the United
States. We want to help you reach your own judgments about the degree to which poli-
tics and government in the United States make the country more or less democratic. You
can then draw your own conclusions about which political practices and institutions in
the United States encourage and sustain popular self-rule and which ones discourage
and undermine it. To help you do this, we must be clear about the meaning of democracy.
Updates Edition
4 Chapter 1
idea that the many could and should rule themselves. Most believed that governing
required the greatest sophistication, intelligence, character, and training—certainly
not the province of ordinary people. Aristotle expressed this view in his classic work
Politics, in which he observed that democracy “is a government in the hands of men of
low birth, no property, and vulgar employments.”
Instead, the Greeks preferred rule either by a select few (by an aristocracy, in which
democracy
a hereditary nobility rules, or by a clerical elite, as in Iran today) or by an enlightened
A system of government in which the
people rule; rule by the many as opposed one, somewhat akin to the philosopher-king described by Plato in his Republic or as in
to rule by one, or rule by the few. England in the time of Elizabeth I. Democracy, then, is “rule by the people” or, to put
it as the Greeks did, self-government by the many, as opposed to oligarchy (rule by
oligarchy
Rule by the few, where a minority holds
the few) or monarchy (rule by the one). The idea that ordinary people might rule them-
power over a majority, as in an aristoc- selves represents an important departure from most historical beliefs.12 In practice,
racy or a clerical establishment. throughout human history, most governments have been quite undemocratic.
monarchy Inherent in the idea of self-rule by ordinary people is an understanding that govern-
Rule by the one, such as where power ment must serve all its people and that ultimately none but the people themselves can be
rests in the hands of a king or queen. relied on to know, and hence to act in accordance with, their own values and interests.13
Updates Edition
Democracy and American Politics 5
Updates Edition
6 Chapter 1
DIRECT DEMOCRACY
In small towns throughout New
England, local policies and budgets
are decided at regular town meetings,
in which the entire town population is
invited to participate.
What are some advantages of town
meetings? What might be the drawbacks?
What other kinds of forums might there be
where direct democracy is possible?
popular sovereignty POPULAR SOVEREIGNTY Popular sovereignty means that people are the ultimate
The basic principle of democracy that source of government authority and that what the government does is determined by
the people are the ultimate source of
what the people want. If ultimate authority resides not in the hands of the many but
government authority and of the policies
that government leaders make. in the hands of the few (as in an aristocratic order) or of the one (whether a benevolent
sovereign or a ruthless dictator), democracy does not exist. Nor does it exist if gov-
ernment consistently fails to follow the preferences and to serve the interests of the
people. The following six conditions are especially important for popular sovereignty
to flourish.
Elections Are Free and Fair If elections are to be useful as a way to keep govern-
ment leaders responsive and responsible, they must be conducted in a fashion that is
free and fair. By free, we mean there is no coercion of voters or election officials and
no serious barriers that prevent people from running for office and voting. By fair,
we mean, among other things, that election rules do not favor some parties and can-
didates over others, that ballots are accurately counted, and that there is no outside
interference by other countries.
People Participate in the Political Process A process is useful in conveying the will
of the people and in keeping leaders responsive and responsible only if the people par-
ticipate. If elections and other forms of political participation attract only a minority of
the eligible population, they cannot serve as a way to understand what the broad pub-
lic wants or as an instrument forcing leaders to pay attention to what the people want.
Widespread participation in politics—including voting in elections, contacting public
officials, working with others to bring matters to public attention, joining associations
that work to shape government actions, and more—is necessary to ensure not only
that responsive representatives will be chosen, but that they will also have continuous
incentives to pay attention to the people. Because widespread participation is so cen-
tral to popular sovereignty, we can say that the less political participation there is in a
society, the weaker the democracy.
Updates Edition
Democracy and American Politics 7
about the issues.21 We might, then, want to speak of democracy as a system in which
government policies conform to what the people want over some period of time.
POLITICAL EQUALITY The second benchmark of representative democracy and a majority rule
necessary condition for popular sovereignty to exist is political equality, the idea that The form of political decision making in
each person, having an intrinsic value that is equal to that of other human beings, car- which policies are decided on the basis
of what a majority of the people want.
ries the same weight in voting and other political decision making.22 Imagine, if you
will, a society in which one person could cast a hundred votes in an election, another political equality
person fifty votes, and still another twenty-five votes, while many unlucky folks had The principle that each person carries
only one vote each—or none at all. Democracy is a way of making decisions in which equal weight in the conduct of the
public business.
each person has one, and only one, voice.
Most people know this intuitively. Our sense of what is fair is offended, for instance, 1965 Voting Rights Act
when some class of people is denied the right to vote in a society that boasts the outer A law that banned racial discrimination
in voting across the United States; it
trappings of democracy. The denial of citizenship rights to African Americans in the
gave the federal government broad
South before the passage of the 1965 Voting Rights Act is such an example. We count it powers to register voters in a set of
as a victory for democracy when previously excluded groups win the right to vote. states, mostly in the South, that had
Political equality also involves what the Fourteenth Amendment to the long practiced election discrimination,
and required that such states pre-clear
Constitution calls “equal protection,” meaning that everyone in a democracy is treated any changes in its election laws with the
the same by government. Government programs, for example, cannot favor one group Department of Justice.
Updates Edition
8 Chapter 1
Updates Edition
Democracy and American Politics 9
Later chapters will show that income and wealth are distributed in a highly
unequal way in the United States, that the scale of this inequality has become dra-
matically more pronounced over the past four decades, and that this inequality more
often than not translates into great inequalities among people and groups in the polit-
ical arena. For example, powerful groups representing the most privileged sectors of
American society shape elections and legislation more than other Americans do.25 In
such circumstances, the political equality benchmark is in danger of being violated.
Updates Edition
10 Chapter 1
Over the years, a number of political philosophers and practitioners have viewed
liberty as threatened by democracy rather than as essential to it. It is our position that
self-government and political liberty are inseparable, in the sense that the former is
impossible without the latter.27 It follows that a majority cannot deprive an individual
or a minority group of its political liberty without violating democracy itself.
liberal democracy
Representative democracy Objections to Representative Democracy
characterized by popular sovereignty,
liberty, and political equality; see
What we have been describing—a system of representative government characterized
representative democracy. by popular sovereignty, political equality, and liberty—commonly is called liberal
democracy. Not everyone is convinced that liberal democracy is the best form of gov-
majority tyranny
ernment. What are the main criticisms that have been leveled against representative,
Suppression of the rights and liberties
of a minority by the majority. or liberal, democracy as we have defined it?
THE THREAT OF “MAJORITY TYRANNY” James Madison and the other F ounders
FEAR CAN UNDERMINE
DEMOCRACY of the American republic feared that majority rule was bound to undermine free-
Political hysteria has periodically dom and threaten the rights of the individual. They created a constitutional system
blemished the record of American designed to protect certain liberties against the unwelcome intrusions of the major-
democracy. Fear of communism, cap- ity. The fears of the Founders were not without basis. What they called the “popular
tured in this editorial cartoon, was
widespread in the United States for
passions” have sometimes stifled the freedoms of groups and individuals who have
much of the 20th century and led to dared to be different. In the 1950s, for example, many people in the movie industry
the suppression of anti-establishment lost their jobs because of anticommunist hysteria whipped up by Senator Joseph
political groups by federal and state McCarthy and others.28 For a time after the 9/11 attacks on the United States, and after
authorities who were acting, in their
the attack in San Bernardino, California in 2015, Muslims became targets of popular
view, in the name of a majority of
Americans. hostility. Mexican American immigrants are routinely derided for taking jobs from
Why was such hysteria able to take hold others, especially in periods of high unemployment or when popular political leaders
in the United States? Can such political label them criminals.
hysteria happen again?
Although there have been instances in our history of majority tyranny,
when, as in the South after Reconstruction, the majority has violated the
citizenship rights of a minority, there is no evidence that the many con-
sistently threaten liberty more than the few or the one. To put it another
way, the majority does not seem to be a special or unique threat to liberty.
Violations against freedom seem as likely to come from powerful individ-
uals, powerful groups, or government officials responding to vocal and
narrow interests as from the majority of the people.
Liberty is essential to self-government, and all who value democracy
must guard against threats to liberty, whatever their origin. But we firmly
reject the view that majority rule inevitably or uniquely threatens liberty.
Majority rule is unthinkable, in fact, without the existence of basic politi-
cal liberties.29
T H E T H R E AT O F T H E P E O P L E ’ S I R R AT I O N A L I T Y A N D
INCOMPETENCE Political scientists have spent decades studying the
attitudes and behaviors of U.S. citizens, and some of the findings are
not encouraging. For the most part, the evidence shows that individual
Americans do not care a great deal about politics and are rather poorly
informed, unstable in their views, and not much interested in participat-
ing in the political process.30 These findings have led some observers to
assert that citizens are not well equipped for the responsibility of self-
governance and that public opinion (the will of the majority) should not
be the ultimate determinant of what government does.
Is the American public uninformed, unsophisticated, and unstable
in its views? This is a serious charge that is addressed in various places
throughout this book. We suggest that much of the evidence about individ-
ual opinions often has been misinterpreted and that the American public,
Updates Edition
Democracy and American Politics 11
taken in aggregate, is more informed, sophisticated, and stable in its views than it is
generally given credit for, though there remains considerable room for improvement.
* * * * *
So, how democratic are we? After reading this chapter, it should be easy to see how
and why the democratic ideal can be used as a measuring stick with which to evaluate
American politics. We have learned that the fundamental attributes of liberal repre-
sentative democracy are popular sovereignty, political equality, and political liberty.
Each suggests a set of questions that will be raised throughout this book to encourage
critical thinking about American political life.
Updates Edition
12 Chapter 1
• Do the news media and political leaders provide accurate and complete information?
• Does government do what citizens want it to do?
• Does government effectively carry out the policies they have instituted in response
to what the people want?
• Do some individuals and groups have persistent and substantial advantages over
other individuals and groups in the political process?
• Is the political game open to all equally?
• Do government decisions and policies benefit some individuals and groups more
than others?
• Are citizens’ rights and liberties universally available, protected, and used?
• Are people free to vote?
• Can people speak openly and form groups freely to petition their government?
• Do public authorities, private groups, or the members of the majority threaten
liberty or the rights of minorities?
These questions will help us assess where we are and where we are going as a
democracy. They will help us go past superficial evaluations based on the existence or
nonexistence of this institution or that institution—for example, an elected legislature—
and allow us to raise questions about the quality of democracy in the United States and
its prospects. Of popular sovereignty, political equality, and political liberty, none are
attainable, of course, in perfect form. They are, rather, ideals to which our nation can
aspire and standards against which we can measure everyday reality. Throughout this
book, we will revisit these questions about the quality of democracy in the United States.
* * * * *
Throughout Struggle for Democracy, we will regularly revisit these topics. And, as a
conclusion to each chapter, you will find a formal assessment for weighing how well
American government and politics measure up to the democratic ideal. Jump forward
to the “Using the Democracy Standard” section at the end of Chapter 2 for a preview.
STRUCTURE Structural factors play key roles in determining what issues become
important in politics and government, how political power is distributed in the p
opulation,
Updates Edition
Democracy and American Politics 13
Government
The set of institutions and actors responsible for making, carrying out, and
interpreting laws.
Congress • President • Executive Branch • Courts
Political Linkage
The connections between structure and government that organize and
transmit the demands of the people.
Public Opinion • Parties • Interest Groups • Voting • Elections • Movements
• Media
© Edward S. Greenberg
Structure
Features of American life that help determine what issues are important,
who has power, and what the rules are.
Constitution • Federalism • Economy • Demographics • Culture • World
and what attitudes and beliefs guide the behavior of citizens and public officials. This cat-
egory includes the economy and society, the constitutional rules, the political culture, and
the international system. These are the most fundamental and enduring factors that influ-
ence government and politics. They form the foundation on which all else is built. They
are the most enduring parts of the American system, and the slowest to change.33
POLITICAL LINKAGE Political linkage factors transmit the wants and demands
of people and groups in our society to government officials and together help shape
what government officials do and what policies they adopt. These include public
opinion, political parties, interest groups, the news media, and elections. While not a
formal part of government, they directly influence what sorts of people are chosen to
be government officials and what these officials do once they are in office.
GOVERNMENT Government factors include all public officials and institutions that
have formal, legal responsibilities for making public policy for the United States. These
include Congress, the president and the executive branch, the federal b ureaucracy,
and the federal courts, including the Supreme Court.
Updates Edition
14 Chapter 1
FIGURE 1.2 APPLYING THE FRAMEWORK: PASSAGE OF THE 1965 VOTING RIGHTS ACT
Government • Courts: The Supreme Court steadily expanded the reach of the “equal protection” clause
of the Constitution’s 14th Amendment.
• President: President Johnson pushed hard for federal protection of African American
voting rights.
• Congress: The pro-civil rights majority in Congress was responsive to voting rights
issues.
Political Linkage • Movements: Dramatic civil rights demonstrations highlighted the denial of the vote to
African Americans in the South.
• Public Opinion and Interest Groups: The public, the media, and interest groups grew
more supportive of the civil rights movement and its goals.
• Elections: The votes of African Americans proved decisive in the most populous and
electoral vote-rich states in the 1960 and 1964 elections.
© Edward S. Greenberg
• Economy: Industrialization in the 20th century spurred the Great Migration of African Americans
Structure from the South to growing cities in the North.
• Economy and Demographics: African Americans outside the South improved their political,
social, and economic standing during the first half of the 20th century.
• World: Cold War rivalry with the Soviet Union is waged mostly in countries with black and
brown populations; segregation in U.S. weakens America’s appeal.
• World: Fighting racist Nazi Germany in World War II creates pressure to integrate U.S. Armed Forces.
Updates Edition
Democracy and American Politics 15
cultural, and social change; constitutional rules; and the international position of the
United States. For example, economic changes in the nation over the course of many
decades had triggered a “great migration” of African Americans from the rural South
to the urban North. Over the long run, this population shift to states with large blocs
of Electoral College votes, critical to the election of presidents, increased the political
power of African Americans. Cultural change increased the number of Americans
bothered by the second-class citizenship of African Americans, even as combat service
in World War II and the Korean War led many black Americans to insist on full citi-
zenship rights. Finally, the Cold War struggle of the United States against the Soviet
Union played an important role. Many American leaders, recognizing the contradic-
tion between asking for the support of people of color in Third World countries in the
struggle against communism while treating African Americans in the United States as
second-class citizens, sought an end to the system of official segregation in the South
(known as Jim Crow).34 Jim Crow
We see, then, that a full explanation of why the 1965 Voting Rights Act happened Popular term for the system of legally
(government action) requires that we take into account how governmental, political linkage, sanctioned racial segregation that
existed in the American South from the
and structural factors interacted with one another to bring about significant change in end of the 19th century until the middle
American politics. Modeling complex government actions can be a c hallenging task, but of the 20th century.
application of an analytical framework can help. The framework developed for Struggle
for Democracy (see Figure 1.1) is just such a tool.
Updates Edition
CHAPTER 1
1965 Voting Rights Act A law that banned racial discrim- liberal democracy Representative democracy character-
ination in voting across the United States; it gave the federal ized by popular sovereignty, liberty, and political equality.
government broad powers to register voters in a set of states, majority rule The form of political decision making in
mostly in the South, that had long practiced election discrimi- which policies are decided on the basis of what a majority of
nation, and required that such states pre-clear any changes in the people want.
its election laws with the Department of Justice. majority tyranny Suppression of the rights and liberties of
anarchist One who believes that people are natural cooper- a minority by the majority.
ators capable of creating free and decent societies without the monarchy Rule by the one, such as where power rests in the
need for government. hands of a king or queen.
autocracy General term that describes all forms of govern- oligarchy Rule by the few, where a minority holds power
ment characterized by rule by a single person or by a group over a majority, as in an aristocracy or a clerical establishment.
with total power, whether a monarchy, a military tyranny, or political equality The principle that each person carries
a theocracy. equal weight in the conduct of the public business.
civil rights Guarantees of equal treatment by government political liberty The principle that citizens in a democracy
officials regarding political rights, the judicial system, and are protected from government interference in the exercise
public programs. of a range of basic freedoms such as the freedoms of speech,
democracy A system of government in which the people rule; association, and conscience.
rule by the many as opposed to rule by one, or rule by the few. popular sovereignty The basic principle of democracy that
direct democracy A form of political decision making in the people are the ultimate source of government authority
which policies are decided by the people themselves, rather and of the policies that government leaders make.
than by their representatives, acting either in small face-to- representative democracy Indirect democracy, in which the
face assemblies or through the electoral process as in initia- people rule through elected representatives; see liberal democracy.
tives and referenda in the American states. social contract The idea that government is the result of an
Jim Crow Popular term for the system of legally sanctioned agreement among people to form one, and that people have
racial segregation that existed in the American South from the the right to create an entirely new government if the terms of
end of the 19th century until the middle of the 20th century. the contract have been violated by the existing one.
16
Updates Edition
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
l’ont raillé et battu ; il s’est isolé de ses parents, de ses camarades ; il
a vécu tout seul, pendant des années, avec les animaux et les
arbres… Il devient tirailleur et voilà qu’au lieu de prendre en pitié sa
simplicité d’esprit, les uns le tournent en dérision, d’autres l’injurient
et d’autres le frappent ; et c’est ainsi qu’au lieu de s’éveiller de sa
longue enfance il reste dans ses ténèbres, et c’est ainsi qu’on le croit
fou… Il n’est pas fou : il ne sait pas vivre. De nos paroles, de nos
gestes, de notre vie, il ne sait rien ; chaque fois qu’il a fait effort pour
sortir de son trou sombre, il s’est trouvé quelqu’un pour l’y rejeter
d’un mot cruel ou d’un coup de pied… Je lui enseignerai la vie : il
saura qu’un homme en vaut un autre ; il répondra aux injures par les
injures, aux coups de poing par les coups de poing. Il connaîtra,
quelque jour, que la valeur des gens se mesure à l’opinion qu’ils ont
d’eux-mêmes ; il verra que l’abîme qui sépare de lui le reste de
l’humanité n’est qu’un ruisseau ; une fois apprise la douzaine de
grimaces indispensables à notre existence quotidienne, il sera un
homme comme toi et moi. Quand il placera en trois temps son
mousqueton dans son bras droit, quand il articulera nettement, en
bon français, son numéro matricule et le nom de son village, quand il
distribuera des œillades aux filles et des gifles aux mauvais
plaisants, qui donc s’avisera encore de juger qu’il est fou ?… Mon
vieux Cang, ma vieille mère Thi-Baÿ, je vous prie de ne parler de ma
démarche à personne, pas même à Maÿ. Dans quelques mois, je la
renouvellerai, lorsque j’aurai fait de Hiên un homme raisonnable…
Donnez-moi encore une tasse de thé !
L’Aïeul s’en alla. Les pensionnaires de Thi-Baÿ avaient reconnu
sa voix et, résignés à l’attente, s’étaient assis contre la barrière du
jardin ; et plus d’un jetait de temps à autre un regard navré vers le
fourneau éteint où refroidissaient les sauces succulentes. Au départ
du lieutenant, ils se dressèrent sur leurs talons et le saluèrent,
ébahis de son air préoccupé.
Pourtant nul n’osa questionner le vieux sergent, dont les sourcils
restèrent fâcheusement froncés tant que dura le lamentable repas.
*
* *
— Alors, demanda Hiên pour la deuxième fois, dans quelques
mois je serai comme tout le monde ?
Il est agenouillé contre la chaise de rotin où l’Aïeul fume sa pipe
en considérant les flancs de la montagne ensanglantés par le soleil
couchant. Les perspectives enchanteresses que son lieutenant lui a
fait entrevoir ont consolé de son échec le prétendant repoussé ; il se
délecte à les contempler d’un œil ébloui et sa main étendue sur
l’accoudoir de la chaise néglige d’agiter l’éventail japonais.
— Tu seras comme tout le monde, ni plus ni moins fou. Tu n’as
qu’à regarder vivre les autres hommes, à les écouter vivre et tu
seras pareil à eux. Et qui sait ? Peut-être Maÿ elle-même viendra-t-
elle te prendre par la main ! Tu auras appris à dire les mots
convenables, à faire les gestes convenables ; le tout est de parler et
de gesticuler au moment convenable ; jamais femme ne résista au
gaillard avisé qui sut choisir son heure.
Hiên écoute, bouche bée ; un univers s’ouvre devant lui.
L’incendie du soleil couchant a gagné le ciel tout entier ; les lentilles
de verre du Phare flamboient ; les crêtes empanachées de bambou
semblent tracées à l’encre de Chine sur un écran de pourpre.
Cependant, malgré le ciel embrasé, malgré la brise chargée
d’odeurs qui fait frissonner les citronniers, malgré les notes égrenées
par les gongs des pagodes invisibles, l’Aïeul est mécontent. Il
regrette sa promesse : il voudrait que le pauvre Hiên ne sortît jamais
de son heureuse inconscience, qu’il continuât à passer, paisible et
ignorant, au milieu des ignominies et des haines inaperçues, qu’il
n’apprît point à vivre…
Mais déjà il n’est plus temps : Hiên le Maboul vivra. Il vivra et il
souffrira ; ses illusions crèveront l’une après l’autre comme des
bulles de savon. Il vivra enfin « comme tout le monde ».
VII
*
* *