Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lawrence Kohlberg - Report
Lawrence Kohlberg - Report
BSN 1 – K
Submitted to:
Getting to know the Theorist
Explanation
- Cognitive in nature, Kohlberg's theory focuses on the thinking process that
occurs when one decides whether a behaviour is right or wrong. Thus, the
theoretical emphasis is on how one decides to respond to a moral dilemma,
not what one decides or what one does.
Kohlberg’s Stages of Moral Development
- Kohlberg’s research yielded three levels of moral development. Each level
consisted of two stages, leading to six stages in total. People pass through
each stage sequentially with the thinking at the new stage replacing the
thinking at the previous stage. Not everyone reached the highest stages in
Kohlberg's theory. In fact, Kohlberg believed that many didn’t move past his
third and fourth stages.
Level 1: Preconventional Morality
- At the lowest level of moral development individuals haven’t yet internalized a
sense of morality. Moral standards are dictated by adults and the
consequences of breaking the rules. Children nine years old and younger tend
to fall into this category.
Metaparadigm in Nursing
Person – The recipient of nursing care in this theory are children, specifically
boys. Stages of moral development is important because it help a person to
recognize the difference between right and wrong. At each stage of moral
development, a person uses different reasoning for making certain moral
choices.
Health – This theory states the psychological health and well-being of children.
Environment – This theory showcases the factors affecting the children’s moral
development at such an early age.
Nursing - Kohlberg's theory can help nurses make more informed decisions by
encouraging them to consider the moral reasoning of all parties involved in the
situation, including patients, families, and healthcare providers.
Education
Research
Critique
- Carol Gilligan was one of Kohlberg's research assistants. She believed that
Kohlberg's theory was inherently biased against women. Gilligan suggests
that the biggest reason that there is a gender bias in Kohlberg's theory is that
males tend to focus on logic and rules. Moreover, Critics object to Kohlberg's
account of development on three main grounds: (i) he never shows that his
stages form a logically hierarchical sequence; (ii) his account of 'cognitive
stimulation' as a determinant of progression from stage to stage is too vague;
and (iii) he includes, and must include, concern for human welfare as a
fundamental principle alongside justice, but provides no account of the
development of consideration for others, which is fundamental to m Indeed,
he demonstrates a widespread disregard for the emotive side of moral
formation. It is also mentioned how important it is to account for the more
negative emotions of shame and guilt. The critique concludes with logical and
practical grounds indicating the need of moral content, which Kohlberg
dismisses abruptly with his disdainful comments to a 'bag of virtues'. The
critique's overall goal is to provide a helpful, if speculative, addendum to
Kohlberg rather than to focus on negative comments.
Further Development
Analysis
What kind of data did Kohlberg collect in his research into the stages of moral
development?
His research was cross-sectional, meaning that he interviewed children of different ages
to see their moral development level. A better way to see if all children follow the same
order through the stages would be to conduct longitudinal research on the same
children.
Comparison
Strengths
Limitations
- A major criticism of Kohlberg's theory is that Kohlberg did not account for
cultural differences in moral reasoning of men and women. Criticism of
Kohlberg's theory regards justice concerns as developmentally more advanced
than reciprocal considerations.
Conclusions