RESEA SAMPLI TYPE APPRO RANGE LIMITS INCLU TERMS ELECT

RCH NG OF ACHES OF SION USED RONIC

TITLE STRATE STUDIE YEARS AND SOURC
GY S EXCLU ES
SION

Assessme No CROSS Quantitat October First This Nursing http://ww

nt of research SECTIO ive 2013 - limitation study students, w.inernati
Burnout sample NAL Decembe is that this includes burnout onaljourn
Levels was AND r 2013 study was student alofcaring
among chosen. DESCRI conducted from sciences.o
Working PTIVE at only turkey rg/
Undergra STUDY one only, and
duate university peers
Nursing in Turkey. assessme
Students Therefore nt is
in , the excluded
Turkey: results from the
Being a cannot be study.
Full Time generalize
Employe d to all
e and working
Student health
college
students.
Second
limitation
is that
how
working
burnout
undergrad
uate
students’
peers get
affected
by their
classmate
s during
their
education
was not
questione
d
SIGN Snowball QUALIT Qualitati Septembe The Students
AND Samplin ATIVE ve r 2012 - inclusion , nursing;
SYMPT g EXPLO Decembe criteria Burnout,
OMS OF RATOR r 2012 for the professio
THE Y-DESC sample nal;
BURNO RIPTIV selection Nursing
UT E were educatio
SYNDR applied to n
OME undergra
duates of
AMONG
this
UNDER
course
GRADU and who,
ATE apparentl
NURSIN y,
G presente
STUDEN d singular
TS signs and
symptom
s of the
burnout
syndrom
e

Working This Term-tim https://kn

Through study was e owledge.e
Nursing conducted employm .southern.
School: on only ent, edu/cgi/vi
The one Nursing ewconten
Effects of campus students t.cgi?artic
Working with a le=1066&
10 or relatively context=ji
More small ur
Hours group of
per Week only 30
on Self nursing
Reported students.
Stress Furtherm
Levels ore, all
and results
Academi were
c Stress self-repor
ted by
students,
thus
leaving
room for
human
error and
the
possibilit
y of
inaccurate
data that
could not
reasonabl
y be
 verified.

Feeling purposiv Qualitati content February The Conflict, https://ww

empower e ve analysis to August limitation Nursing w.scienced
ed: sampling approach 2020 of this students; irect.com/s
Nursing method study was Postgrad cience/arti
that some uate cle/pii/S22
students’ of the Nursing; 141391230
experienc interviews Graduate 00598?via
es of were not %3Dihub
work-fam conducte
ily-schoo d face to
l role face due
conflicts to the
COVID-19
pandemic
.
However,
an
attempt
was made
to create a
better
interactio
n with the
participan
ts by
video
calling on
social
media.

Employm Despite a https://w

ent as a descripti reasonabl ww.scien
predictor ve e cedirect.c
of mental cross-sec response om/scienc
tional rate,
health, study results
e/article/a
psycholo presented bs/pii/S87
gical in this 55722318
distress, paper 300346
anxiety result
and from data
depressio collected
n in at only
one
Australia
university
n with the
pre-regist students
ration that were
nursing available.
students
Snowball
Cross-sec Quantitati . First, The Burnout, https://w
Students’ sampling
tional ve even research well-bein ww.mdpi.
Burnout method
though ers g, com/1660
at
the BAT-C discusse university -4601/19/
University
evaluates d the students, 18/11341
: The
a wide differenc gender,
Role of
Gender range of es in the working
and symptoms students’ students
Worker , it does burnout
Status not take experien
depressio ce based
(2022)
n levels on
and gender
personal and
resources worker
into status. It
account also
which is explored
needed to the
have an differenc
in-depth es
understan between
ding the
about the burnout
students’ of
academic working
adjustme and
nt. non-wor
king
Second, studen
the study
did not
discuss
the
working
students’
work-relat
ed
variables
such as
working
hours and
the kind
of work
they have
which
might
contribute
to their
burnout
experienc
e

Third, the
researche
rs did not
discuss
the
interactio
ns
between
private
life and
working
 life
dimension
s resulting
in gaps in
understan
ding the
role of
support
systems
and its
effect on
burnout
experienc
e.
Purposive Qualitativ The This Optimism
Descriptiv https://w
Optimism sampling e participan study , job
e ww.scienc
and risk ts were all investiga burnout,
edirect.co
for job working ted the stress
m/science
burnout at college. relations
/article/a
among But, they hip
bs/pii/S01
working are all between
91886999
college White. three
001919
students: The study factors:
stress as is optimism
a generalize , stress,
mediator d; it did and risk
not for job
discuss burnout.
the Results
individual showed
difference that
s when it optimism
comes to is an
mental importan
toughness t
, predictor
optimism, of risk
pessimism for job
, which burnout.
can vary
in
different
cultures.
Therefore
, this
generaliza
tion could
affect the
reliability
of the
result and
could not
be used
to
represent
a more
diverse
populatio
 n.
Perceived Convenie Descriptiv Quantitati The Perceived https://w
stress, nce e, ve study stress, ww.scienc
coping sampling Cross-sec examine coping edirect.co
style and tional d the style, m/science
burnout perceive burnout, /article/a
of d levels clinical bs/pii/S14
Chinese of stress, practice, 71595322
nursing coping nursing 000993
students style and
in burnout
late-stag among
e clinical Chinese
practice: nursing
A students
cross-sec in
tional late-stag
study e clinical
practice.
Results
showed
that the
majority
of the
nursing
students
in clinical
practice
perceive
d
themselv
es to
have
moderat
e to high
stress
levels. In
this
study,
high
levels of
stress,
high
passive
coping
and low
positive
coping
level
increase
d
students’
burnout
level,
which all
led the
students
to have
 an
intention
to leave
nursing
school.

Burnout among
Criterion Cross-secti Mixed First, this The study Burnout, http://ww
nursing
sampling onal method, study used investigate profession w.scielo.or
students: a
explanator a d burnout al, g.co/scielo
mixed method
y self-report syndrome students, .php?pid=
study
sequential measure among nursing, S0120-530
study that which is undergrad surveys, 720200001
combined then prone uate questionna 00007&scri
quantitativ to socially nursing ires pt=sci_artt
e and desirable students. ext
qualitative responses. Results
approache showed
s Second, that there
the study is a
was prevalence
cross-secti of burnout
onal in syndrome
nature among the
which students.
suggests And, the
the more
possibility advanced
of bias, the school
especially year,
to the exhaustion
student’s and
who are depersonal
healthy ization also
because increases,
those who resulting in
developed low
the academic
syndrome scores.
may
possibly be
off course
(e.g.
mental
health
issues)
increasing
the
prevalence
.

Third, the
results
obtained
cannot be
generalize
 d since
they
portray the
experience
s of the
nursing
students in
a Brazilian
public
university.

Stress, coping Purposive Descriptive Quantitativ The study Coping, https://ww

and burn-out in sampling e explored empirical w.scienced
nursing the research irect.com/s
relationshi report, cience/arti
p between eustress, cle/abs/pii/
the nursing S00207489
sources of education, 10000830
stress and burnout,
psychologi stress
cal
burnout.
As well as
the
different
coping of
nursing
students in
the face of
burnout.
The results
showed
that
avoidance
coping was
the
strongest
predictor
of burnout
which can
produce
adverse
effects and
worsen
burnout.
On the
other
hand,
initiatives
to promote
support
and
self-efficac
y can
enhance
the
students’
well-being.
 this study this study anxiety, https://doi.
does not did not depressio org/10.339
Psychological convenie Cross-Sec 2021- 0%2Fijerp
nce allow to analyze n, mental h1806302
Well-Being in tiona 2021 conclude specific health,
sampling 0
Nursing a variables problem-
Students: A predictive or based
relationsh constructs learning,
Multicentric,
ip of the related to stress
Cross-Sectiona studied well-bein psycholog
l Study variables g (such as ical,
or to the students,
analyze developm nursing
other ent of
variables personal
that may and social
have abilities)
affected and
mental attitudes
health in (such as
nursing personal
students resilience
); or
mediating
variables
(such as
the
dispositio
nal
optimism
associated
with
stress
reduction)

Academic stratified descripti quantita 2022-20 the study Study is Academic, https://www.
conducted burnout, jehp.net//tex
burnout proportio ve tive 23 had the nursing, t.asp?2023/
in India
among nate survey survey limitation and students, 12/1/141/37
undergraduat sampling research of having undergradu 4757
approac several ate
e nursing techniqu data participant
students: A e h collected s of other
quantitative through university
in India,
survey online which
approach mode. excludes
The other
study country
recomm experience
s
ends
qualitativ
e or
 mixed
method
studies
to
explore
the
experien
ce of
academi
c
burnout
among
the
nursing
students.
2019- https://dx.d
2019 oi.org/10.1
007/s1112
6-018-962
2-3
Working
Nursing
Students
Willing to
Seek
Psychological
Services

Quota The Role

The relationship Correlation Qualitative The study https://ww
sampling research conflict,
between al examined w.emerald.
focused stress,
school-work-fam the com/insigh
more on burnout,
ily-conflict, inter-role t/content/
the school-wor
subjective conflicts doi/10.110
inter-role k-family
stress, and between 8/JMP-01-
conflicts conflict,
burnout school-wor 2015-0014
involving subjective
k-family /full/html
the family stress,
and its
and work work-life
effect on
rather than stress
subjective
the school
stress and
roles.
burnout.
The
researcher
s
hypothesiz
ed that
inter-role
conflicts
are directly
related to
subjected
stress and
burnout.
Thus, the
greater the
conflict,
the greater
the
subjective
stress and
burnout.
Additionall
y, this
study
claimed
that
women
experience
more
work-famil
y-school
conflicts
than men.