Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 6

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/315878436

The influence of Instagram communication


attributes on Generation Y sharing travel photo
behaviour

Conference Paper · October 2016

CITATIONS READS

0 157

2 authors:

Faiz Anuar Rozzana Ihsanuddin


Universiti Teknologi MARA Universiti Teknologi MARA
12 PUBLICATIONS 15 CITATIONS 1 PUBLICATION 0 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by Faiz Anuar on 11 April 2017.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


The Influence of Social Media Communication Attributes of Instagram
on Generation Y Sharing Travel Photo Behavior
R. Ihsanuddin & F. I. Anuar
Universiti Teknologi MARA Malaysia

ABSTRACT: It has become a norm to share travel photos and experiences through social media as it acts as
proof that one has visited a place. Instagram is one of the most popular and preferred social media and the
platform for Generation Y to express and share experiences. Possessing similar attributes such as consist of
participation, conversation, and persuasion, this study aimed to examine the extent these attributes influence
their intention to share and behavior in sharing travel photos. Findings found that not all attributes influenced
Generation Y’s intention and behavior in sharing travel photos. Interestingly, the study found no mediation
effect of intention to share travel photos toward the relationship between Instagram communication attributes
and Generation Y’s sharing travel photo behavior. This study will help the tourism marketers and managers to
better understand Generation Y’s behavior in order to capture these generations for the growth of tourism in-
dustry in Malaysia.

Key words: Social Media, Communication Attributes, Instagram, Travel Photo Behavior, Generation Y.

1 INTRODUCTION However, researchers argue on how Generation Y


uses social media; for instance Lenhart and Madden
The technology advancement and social media (2007); Palfrey and Gasser (2008) claimed that Gen-
emergence have changed tourism industry on how eration Y contributes, shares, searches and consumes
tourists seek information, their traveling behavior content while Pempek, Yermolayeva, and Calvert
and decision-making (Lenhart, 2015). A study by (2009); Park, Kee, and Valenzuela (2009) and Bol-
LeadSift (2013), examining the influence of social ton et al. (2013) posited that Generation Y did not
media in the tourism industry, reported that 74% contribute anything in return and only relying on so-
travelers use social media while traveling and in the cial media for entertainment, interaction, infor-
74%, 48% of travelers use social media to share vid- mation, leisure and socializing.
eos and photos. The numbers are increasing year by Importantly, Generation Y and social media today
year as according to Morrison (2014), where 476 are inseparable: They like to share and post pictures
million of people uploaded and shared photos in Instagram especially while traveling (Barton,
online, 329 million of people posted comments Haywood, Jhunjhunwala, & Bhatia, 2013). A recent
about daily activities, and 287 million of people study made by Jang, Han, Shih, and Lee (2015) re-
shared a link to an article. vealed that 91% travelers choose to share their travel
Instagram, launched in 2010, is a media-sharing experiences via photos, and over 50 million travel
network allowing users to snap or upload a photo, photos have been shared on Instagram since it was
edit and share it online (iContact.com, 2013). As of launched in 2010. In Malaysia context, Sparks, Per-
September 2015, the number of Instagram users has kins, and Buckley (2013) discovered that Instagram
increased to 400 million active users (Nusair, Bilgi- is indeed a popular and most preferred social media
han, Okumus, & Cobanoglu, 2015). In line with the among Generation Y after Facebook and Instagram.
increase in users, an act of posting travel photos and In spite of its popularity among Generation Y,
experiences in Instagram as an evidence of visiting a there are questions about Instagram not yet an-
place has become a norm among its users (Hillman, swered. Among them are the extent to which factors
2007). Sharing travel photos and experiences in- influence Generation Y to share travel photo in In-
stantly through social media accounts has become stagram and their behavior in sharing it. Do partici-
much easier (Nusair et al., 2013). pation, conversation and persuasion in communica-
Bolton et al. (2013) posited that Generation Y is tion plays an important role in influencing their
technology savvy and a visually sophisticated gener- intention and decision in sharing travel photo?
ation making them easy to adapt to use technology There is still limited understanding to what extent
for tourism as they are born along with the introduc- social media; specifically Instagram communication
tion of technology. Therefore, with the unique char- attributes influence Generation Y’s sharing travel
acteristics of Generation Y, travel pattern and behav- photo behavior. Previous studies investigated on the
ior when traveling have changed along with the rap- relationship between social media and technology
rapid change and growth of technology. towards the behavior of traveling among Generation
Y (Rubegni, Gerardi, & Caporali, 2007; Simms & teraction as opposed to giving monologs, passively
Gretzel, 2013; Wang, Park, & Fesenmaier, 2011) but observing and lurking’ (Burgoon et al., 2000). In
very limited research has focused on Instagram spe- line with the proceeding notion, social media allows
cifically communication attributes and sharing travel people to participate in a conversation with each
photo behavior (Fotis, Buhalis, & Rossides, 2012; other to contribute information and knowledge to
Fromm, 2014; Sorokina, 2015). Therefore, to ad- others (Koh & Kim, 2004). It is a medium for people
dress the gap; this study warrants an empirical inves- to communicate to express their ideas, emotions and
tigation in order to identify the influence of Insta- opinions (O’Reilly, Berger, Hernandez, Parent, &
gram communication attributes on Generation Y’s Seguin, 2012). Bercovici (2010) suggested it as a
sharing travel photo behavior. place that people can be entertained, communicate
and participate in a social environment where Gen-
eration Y contributes, shares, searches and consume
2 BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY content by creating and combining information from
multiple sites thus makes them an active participant
in social media (Bolton et al., 2013).
2.1 Social Media Research has defined persuasion in many ways
There is still a lack of agreement on what social where Perloff (2003), summarize the definitions into
media is as it is evolving very fast. Bolton et al. a symbolic process in which communicators try to
(2013) defines social media as an online service us- convince other people to change their attitude or be-
ers can create, edit and share an array of content for havior through a message without any coercion.
the view of thousands of people. McCann (2008) de- Manning (2012), adds the definition by stating that
scribes it as the “applications, platforms and media persuasion is naturally linked with reasons where it
which aim to facilitate interaction, collaboration, and is an act of convincing people by using argument
the sharing of content”. Safko and Brake (2009) de- and reasons. For instance, when a tourists search for
fine it as "activities, practices, and behaviors among information from online review sites about a certain
communities of people who gather online to share destination, they are likely to form impressions
information, knowledge and opinions using conver- whether the review is useful, informative and accu-
sational media which are Internet applications that rate as stated by Sen and Lerman (2007). In line with
allow users to share words, photos, videos and files” the preceding notion, Pendergast (2010) states that
(p.290). Krishnamurthy and Dou (2008), Social me- as for Generation Y, their friends and families’ opin-
dia comprises of user- generated services, social ions are highly valued and have a great influence on
networking site, online review/rating site, virtual their decision-making, behavior and attitude.
game world, video sharing sites and online commu- As technology continues to expand and integrate
nities. All definitions are more or less similar high- in everyday life of Generation Y, more choices and
lighting social media as a form of communication options are available for them to choose in such fast
where users can create, edit and share content with and efficient way thus affecting their behavioral, at-
other online communities. titudes and decisions. Hence, Generation Y now can
Possessing similar attributes like any other social be said to be impatient and intolerant for delays due
media, Instagram has been the top social media used to the easy and quick access to information from the
by the Generation Y (Fromm, 2014). As evidence, Internet (Raunio, 2014) but at the same time as ac-
Ezumah (2013) reported that 90% of pleasure travel- cording to Moscardo and Benckendorff (2010) Gen-
ers snap photos and almost half of them (45%) post- eration Y is said to be more tolerant for diversity,
ed it on social media seeking thoughts and ideas different lifestyles and multiculturalism. This study,
from social media while searching a potential desti- therefore, investigated on the social media commu-
nation to visit. This statement is further supported by nication attributes, which include participation, con-
Bergh (2013), where Generation Y is an active con- versation and persuasion, an their influences in the
tributor to social media content where 54% do post behavioral intention to share and Generation Y’s
information mainly about products, brands and com- sharing travel photo behavior.
panies as compared to other generation which only
contribute only 45% in social media content. These
statistics show the significant role of social media is 3 METHODOLOGY
towards travelers, especially for Generation Y.
3.1 Data Collection
2.2 Communication Attributes of Instagram
The study aims to identify the relationship be-
Serving as a communication channel between tween Instagram communication attributes, the be-
people, there are few characteristics and attributes in havioral intention to share travel photo and Genera-
Instagram: participation, conversation and persua- tion Y’s sharing travel photo behavior; a correlation
sion. Participation refers to ‘the extent to which research design using quantitative approach through
senders and receivers are actively engaged in the in- cross-sectional study is considered the most suitable
method to be used. A self-administered online ques- H3: There is a significant relationship between intention to share travel
tionnaire survey (Qualtrics) was developed in order photo and Generation Y’s sharing travel photo behavior.
to obtain quantitative information from Generation H4: Intention to share mediates the relationship between Instagram com-
Y Instagram users. In addition, self-administered munication attributes and Generation Y’s sharing travel photo behav-
paper-based questionnaire were distributed to enrich ior.
the data collection process. A total of 412 completed
surveys were collected throughout the data collec- Based on Table 1, Instagram Communication At-
tion period. The questionnaires were coded and tributes explained 37.6% (R2 = .376, F-Change=
keyed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences 81.980, p < .001) of the variance in Generation Y’s
(SPSS) version 21. The reliability test result showed sharing travel photo behavior. Beta coefficient value
that the instrument and items used were reliable as (β = .381, p < .001) for persuasion dimension indi-
the Cronbach’s Alpha for all instruments are higher cates that it had the most influence on Generation
than .70. Y’s sharing travel photo behavior followed by the
participation dimension (β = .274, p < .001). How-
ever, conversation dimension was not significant
4 RESULT AND ANALYSIS with the lowest beta coefficient value of (β = -.005).
This indicates that conversation is not one of the fac-
tors that influence the behavior of Generation Y in
4.1 Descriptive Statistic posting travel photo. Thus, H1a and H1c were sup-
The majority of the respondents were female which ported while H1b was not supported. Since that, H1
accounted to 66% (N=271) whereas the remaining was partially supported. Meanwhile, Table 2 shows
34% (N=141) are male respondents. As previously that Instagram Communication Attributes explained
stated, this research follows Brosdahl and Carpenter 63 percent (R2= .630, F-Change= 231.440, p < .001)
(2012) categorization of Generation Y which age of the variance in intention to share travel photo.
range are from 16 years old to 30 years old. There-
fore, the age data was divided into three categories, Table 1. Hypothesis Testing 1
which are 16 – 20 years old, 21 – 25 years old and Predictor Model/Std β
26 – 30 years old. Almost half (49%) of the re- Instagram Communication Attributes
spondents are from the age range of 21 – 25 years - Participation .274***
old (N=203) followed by 26 – 30 years old that - Conversation -.005
holds 28% (N=114) and the balance of 23% of the - Persuasion .381***
respondents (N=95) are from the age range of 16 – R² .376
20 years old. Adjusted R² .372
R² Change .376
F- Change 81.980***
4.2 Hypothesis Testing
Note: *p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001
From the research framework, four main hypoth-
esis and three sub-hypothesis was formulated and Table 2. Hypothesis Testing 2
tested: Predictor Model/Std β
H1: There is a significant relationship between Instagram communication
Instagram Communication Attributes
attributes and Generation Y’s sharing travel photo behavior.
- Participation .347***
H1a: There is a significant relationship between participation as Instagram
- Conversation .464***
communication attributes and Generation Y’s sharing travel photo be-
- Persuasion 0.62
havior.
R² .630
H1b: There is a significant relationship between conversation as Instagram Adjusted R² .627
communication attributes and Generation Y’s sharing travel photo be- R² Change .630
havior. F- Change 231.440***
H1c: There is a significant relationship between persuasion as Instagram Note: *p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001
communication attributes and Generation Y’s sharing travel photo be-
havior. Beta coefficient value (β = .464, p < .001) for
H2: There is a significant relationship between Instagram communication conversation dimension indicates that it had the most
attributes and intention to share travel photo. influence on the intention to share travel photos fol-
H2a: There is a significant relationship between participation as Instagram lowed by the participation dimension (β = .347, p <
communication attributes and intention to share travel photo. .001). However, surprisingly persuasion dimension
H2b: There is a significant relationship between conversation as Instagram was not significant with the lowest beta coefficient
communication attributes and intention to share travel photo. value of (β = .062, p > .05). This indicates that per-
H2c: There is a significant relationship between persuasion as Instagram suasion is not one of the factors that influence the in-
communication attributes and intention to share travel photo. tention to share travel photos in Instagram among
the Generation Y. Thus, H2a and H2b were support-
ed while H2c was not supported. Since that, H2 was Instagram communication attributes were able to
partially supported. explain 37.6% of the variance in Generation Y’s
sharing travel photo behavior. These findings are
Table 3. Hypothesis Testing 3 similar with Bolton et al.’s (2013) study where it
Predictor Model/Std β was found that the social media users specifically
Intention to Share Travel Photo .422*** Generation Y contributes, shares, and searches and
R² .178 consume content by creating and combining infor-
Adjusted R² .176 mation from multiple sites thus makes them an ac-
R² Change .178 tive participant in social media.
F- Change 88.885***
The results from this study also documented that
Note: *p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001
participation dimension (β = .274***, p< .001) in-
Table 3 shows that intention to share travel photo fluenced Generation Y's sharing travel photo behav-
explained 17.8 percent (R2= .178, F-Change= ior where the relationship are the second highest and
88.885, p < .001) of the variance in Generation Y’s significant, after the persuasion dimension (β =
sharing travel photo behavior. Beta coefficient value .381***. p < .001). However the findings also re-
(β = .422, p < .001) for the intention to share travel vealed that even though they are active users in In-
photos indicates that it significantly influence the stagram, they do not always talk/share/post things
travel photo sharing behavior. Thus, the result of H3 that a lot of people talk/share/post about travel on
was supported. Instagram. This result is consistent with past litera-
ture where Bruns (2009) has stated that some users
Table 4. Mediation Effect of Generation Y primarily use Instagram to be in-
Without the effect of intention formed or entertained which makes them passive
to share travel photos and non-participating.
(Mediator) As for conversation variable in Instagram com-
Dimension Beta (β) Adj. R2 Sig. munication attributes, findings shows that there is a
Instagram Communication
.547*** .299 .000
high response towards that feels Instagram is a good
Attributes place for Generation Y to communicate with other
With the effect of intention to people and to engage in a meaningful conversation.
share travel photos A study conducted by Cabral (2011) support the
(Mediator) findings as Generation Y form the highest percent-
Instagram Communication
Attributes .712*** .309 .000 age of social media users due to the feel that they
need to be constantly in contact with their friends,
Independent Variable: BEHAVIOR and they see social media as a medium to strengthen
Note: *p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001 relationships. There is a possibility that they com-
municate and converse in Instagram about other
The beta coefficient value of the relation between things but not specifically about travel. This could
Instagram communication attributes and Generation be true as the findings are consistent with a research
Y’s sharing travel photo behavior with the effect of made by Bergh (2013) where the researcher found
intention to share has increase from β= .547*** to that 54% of Generation Y post in Instagram mainly
β= .712*** (Table 4). On the other hand, the R2 only about products, brands, and companies.
increased 1% after the effect of intention to share Meanwhile, the study revealed that most of the re-
travel photos as the mediator (R2= .299 to R2= .309) spondents are easily influenced by the persuasion of
(Table 4). This signifies that there is no mediation
travel photos posted by their family and friends on
effect of intention to share travel photos toward the
relationship between Instagram communication at- Instagram due to trust. This statement is supported
tributes and Generation Y’s sharing travel photo be- by Pendergast (2010) that states as for Generation Y,
havior. their friends’ and families’ opinions are highly val-
ued and have a great influence on their decision-
making, behavior and attitude. In addition, the find-
5 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION ings also revealed that their decision to share travel
photo on Instagram has resulted from the persuasion
The main focus of this study was to examine the from their family and friends. The results are con-
relationship between Instagram communication at- sistent with a study made by Teng et al. (2014) that
tributes and Generation Y’s sharing travel photo be- conducted a study focusing on Facebook where the
havior while considering their intention to share as researcher found that half (52%) of it users are influ-
the mediating variable. From the research findings, enced by their friends’ photos that are posted online.
It is true as the result of this research revealed that in UK Attractions' Sector. Current Issues in Tourism, 16(1),
the persuasion dimension shows the most influence 17-46.
Lenhart, A. (2015). Teens, Social Media & Technology Over-
on Generation Y’s sharing travel photo behavior. view 2015. Retrieved from Pew Research Center website:
Nevertheless, there are still limited studies on the http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/04/09/teens- social-media-
relationship between the Instagram communication technology-2015/
attributes and Generation Y's sharing behavior. Un- Lenhart, A., & Madden, M. (2007). Teens, Privacy and Online
derstanding Generation Y’s sharing behavior will Social Networks: How Teens Manage Their Online Identities
and Personal Information in the age of MySpace.
help the industry, the government, the tourism mar- Manning, T. (2012). The art of successful persuasion: seven
keters and managers understand this new emerging skills you need to get your point across effectively. Industri-
market as they will be the potential tourists as well al and Commercial Training, 44(3), 150-158.
as the future generation that will further develop the Morrison, K. (2014). What, How and Why People Share on
tourism industry. Due to that, it is important to un- Social Media [Infographic]. Retrieved from
http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/author/kimberleemorris
derstand Generation Y behavior as the industry and on
tourism marketers can fully utilize their resources in Moscardo, G., & Benckendorff, P. (2010). Mythbusting: Gen-
achieving profit maximization with minimum cost eration Y and Travel. UK: CAB International.
through develop new strategies for social media Nusair, K. K., Bilgihan, A., Okumus, F., & Cobanoglu, C.
communication as well as enhancing and promoting (2013). Generation Y travelers’ commitment to online social
network websites. Tourism Management, 35, 13-22.
destination through Instagram. O’Reilly, N., Berger, I. E., Hernandez, T., Parent, M. M., &
Seguin, B. (2012). Understanding adolescent sport participa-
tion through online social media. Sport, Business and Man-
6 REFERENCES agement: An International Journal, 2(1), 69-81.
Palfrey, J., & Gasser, U. (2008). Understanding the First Gen-
Barton, C., Haywood, J., Jhunjhunwala, P., & Bhatia, V. eration of Digital Natives. New York, NY.
(2013). Traveling with Millennials: The Boston Consulting Pempek, T. A., Yermolayeva, Y. A., & Calvert, S. L. (2009).
Group. College students' social networking experiences on Face-
Bergh, J. V. d. (2013). Millenials and Social Media. Retrieved book. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30(3),
from http://www.howcoolbrandsstayhot.com pp. 227-238.
Bolton, R. N., Parasuraman, A., Hoefnagels, A., Migchels, N., Pendergast, D. (2010). Getting to Know the Y Generation. UK:
Kabadayi, S., Gruber, T., . . . Solnet, D. (2013). Understand- CAB International.
ing Generation Y and their use of social media: a review and Perloff, R. M. (2003). The Dynamics of Persuasion: Communi-
research agenda. Journal of Service Management, 24(3), pp. cation and Attitudes in the 21st Century. NJ: Mahwah.
245-267. Raunio, J. M. (2014). Understanding the Travel Behavior of
Bruns, A. (2009). Social Media: Tools for User-Generated Generation Y. (Master in Human Geography), Mid-Sweden
Content (Vol. 2). Australia: Smart Services CRC Pty Ltd. University, Mid-Sweden University.
Burgoon, J. K., Bonito, J. A., Bengtsson, B., Ramirez, A., Rubegni, E., Gerardi, S., & Caporali, M. (2007). Mobile Appli-
Dunbar, N. E., & Miczo, N. (2000). Testing the Interactivity cations for Helping Users to Keep Track of Their Travel Ex-
Model: Processes, partner assessments, and the quality of perience. ECCE 2007 Conference.
collaborative work. Journal of Management Information Sys- Safko, L., & Brake, D. K. (2009). The Social Media Bible:
tem, 16(3), 33-56. Tactics, tools and strategies for business success: Wiley,
Cabral, J. (2011). Is Generation Y Addicted to Social Media? John & Sons, Incorporated.
The Elon Journal of Undergraduate Research in Communi- Sen, S., & Lerman, D. (2007). Why are you telling me this? An
cations, 2(1). examination into negative consumer reviews on the web.
Fotis, J., Buhalis, D., & Rossides, N. (2012). Social Media Use Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21(4), 76-94
and Impact during the Holiday Travel Planning Process. In Simms, A., & Gretzel, U. (2013). Planning a vacation using so-
M. Fuchs, F. Ricci & L. Cantoni (Eds.), Information and cial media:Influences of demographic, psychographic, and
Communication Technologies in Tourism 2012 (pp. 13-24): trip-related characteristics.
Springer Vienna. Sorokina, O. (2015). 8 Types of Social Media and How Each
Fromm, J. (2014). 2014 Millennial Trends. Retrieved from Can Benefit Your Business. Retrieved from Hootsuite.com
http://www.millennialmarketing.com/ website: http://blog.hootsuite.com/types-of-social-media/
iContact.com. (2013). Instagram. Retrieved 5 April 2014. Sparks, B. A., Perkins, H. E., & Buckley, R. (2013). Online
Jang, J. Y., Han, K., Shih, P. C., & Lee, D. (2015). Generation travel reviews as persuasive communication: The effects of
Like: Comparative Characteristics in Instagram. Paper pre- content type, source, and certification logos on consumer be-
sented at the Understanding & Protecting Kids Tech Use, havior. Tourism Management, 39.
CHI 2015, Crossings, Seoul, Korea. Teng, S., Khong, K. W., Goh, W. W., & Chong, A. Y. L.
Koh, J., & Kim, Y.-G. (2004). Knowledge sharing in virtual (2014). Examining the antecedents of persuasive eWOM
communities: an e-business perspective. Expert Systems with messages in social media. Online Information Review,
Applications, 26(2), 155–166. 38(6).
LeadSift. (2013). The Future of Social Media & Destination Wang, D., Park, S., & Fesenmaier, D. R. (2011). The Role of
Marketing. Retrieved from http://leadsift.com/future-social- Smartphones in Mediating the Touristic Experience. Journal
media-destination-marketing-infographic/ of Travel Research 426-436.
Leask, A., Fyall, A., & Barron, P. (2013). Generation Y: Op-
portunity or Challenge - Strategies to Engage Generation Y

View publication stats

You might also like