Download full ebook of Evidence Based Emergency Imaging Optimizing Diagnostic Imaging Of Patients In The Emergency Care Setting Evidence Based Imaging Aine Kelly Editor Paul Cronin Editor Stefan Puig Editor Kimberly E Apple online pdf all chapter docx

Evidence Based Emergency Imaging
Optimizing Diagnostic Imaging of

Patients in the Emergency Care Setting
Evidence Based Imaging Aine Kelly
Editor Paul Cronin Editor Stefan Puig
Editor Kimberly E Applegate Editor
Visit to download the full and correct content document:
https://ebookmeta.com/product/evidence-based-emergency-imaging-optimizing-diagn
ostic-imaging-of-patients-in-the-emergency-care-setting-evidence-based-imaging-ain
e-kelly-editor-paul-cronin-editor-stefan-puig-editor-kimberly-e-apple/
More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant
download maybe you interests ...
Atlas of Emergency Imaging from Head to Toe Michael N

Patlas Editor Douglas S Katz Editor Mariano Scaglione
Editor
https://ebookmeta.com/product/atlas-of-emergency-imaging-from-
head-to-toe-michael-n-patlas-editor-douglas-s-katz-editor-
mariano-scaglione-editor/
Evidence-Based Emergency Care: DIAGNOSTIC TESTING AND

CLINICAL DECISION RULES 3rd Edition Jesse M. Pines
https://ebookmeta.com/product/evidence-based-emergency-care-
diagnostic-testing-and-clinical-decision-rules-3rd-edition-jesse-
m-pines/
Pediatric Diagnostic Labs for Primary Care An Evidence

based Approach Rita Marie John (Editor)
https://ebookmeta.com/product/pediatric-diagnostic-labs-for-
primary-care-an-evidence-based-approach-rita-marie-john-editor/
Emergency Imaging Of At Risk Patients General

Principles Michael N. Patlas
https://ebookmeta.com/product/emergency-imaging-of-at-risk-
patients-general-principles-michael-n-patlas/
Atlas of Imaging in Cardio Oncology Case Based Study
Guide Richard M. Steingart (Editor)
https://ebookmeta.com/product/atlas-of-imaging-in-cardio-
oncology-case-based-study-guide-richard-m-steingart-editor/
Transplantation Imaging Ghaneh Fananapazir Editor Ramit

Lamba Editor
https://ebookmeta.com/product/transplantation-imaging-ghaneh-
fananapazir-editor-ramit-lamba-editor/
Diseases of the Abdomen and Pelvis 2023-2026:

Diagnostic Imaging Juerg Hodler (Editor)
https://ebookmeta.com/product/diseases-of-the-abdomen-and-
pelvis-2023-2026-diagnostic-imaging-juerg-hodler-editor/
Imaging and Technology in Urology Sotonye Tolofari

(Editor)
https://ebookmeta.com/product/imaging-and-technology-in-urology-
sotonye-tolofari-editor/
Atlas of Orbital Imaging Guy Ben Simon (Editor)
https://ebookmeta.com/product/atlas-of-orbital-imaging-guy-ben-
simon-editor/
Evidence-Based Imaging
Improving the Quality of Imaging in
Patient Care
Series Editors
L. Santiago Medina, Kimberly E. Applegate and C. Craig Blackmore
Aims of the Series

Evidence-Based Imaging: Improving the Quality of Imaging in
Patient Care series presents the radiologist and clinician with a user-
friendly guide to the evidence-based science and the merit behind
the diagnostic imaging performed in medicine. This ideal reference
gathers contributions by internationally renowned specialists in the
field. The series provides a systematic framework for understanding
the best imaging choices for patient care. Chapters highlight key
points that support the clinical applications, allowing fast access to
pertinent information. Topics include patient selection, imaging,
strategies, test performance, cost-effectiveness, and applicability.
By offering a clear understanding of the science behind the
evidence, the book fills a void for radiologists, clinicians, physician
assistants, nurse practitioners, residents, fellows, students and
others with an interest in medical imaging and a desire to implement
an evidence-based approach.
More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/
series/8865
Editors
Aine Kelly, Paul Cronin, Stefan Puig and Kimberly E. Applegate
Evidence-Based Emergency Imaging

Optimizing Diagnostic Imaging of Patients
in the Emergency Care Setting
Editors
Aine Kelly
Department of Radiology, Division of Cardio-Thoracic Radiology,
Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Paul Cronin
Stefan Puig
Department of Diagnostic, Interventional, and Pediatric Radiology
Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Klinik im Park, Hirslanden
AG, Zurich, Switzerland
Kimberly E. Applegate
Department of Radiology, University of Kentucky Children’s Hospital,
Lexington, KY, USA
Evidence-Based Imaging
ISBN 978-3-319-67064-5 e-ISBN 978-3-319-67066-9
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67066-9
Library of Congress Control Number: 2017964706
© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

2018
This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the

Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned,
specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations,
recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other
physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval,
electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar
methodology now known or hereafter developed.
The use of general descriptive names, registered names,

trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply,
even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are
exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and
therefore free for general use.
The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that
the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and
accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the
authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with
respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or
omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral
with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and
institutional affiliations.
Printed on acid-free paper
This Springer imprint is published by the registered company

Springer International Publishing AG part of Springer Nature.
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham,
Switzerland
To our patients, who are our best teachers
To our students, who are the healthcare providers of tomorrow
To the researchers, who made this book possible
To our families, friends, and mentors
AMK: To my loving family past, present, and future, Paddy, Anita,
Paul, Alison, Anna, and Eva
PC: To my parents, Brendan and Claire. To my loving and
supportive wife, Aine, who makes it all possible and our two children
who are truly our pride and joy. To my sister, Alison
SP: To my wife, Rosi; my sons, Julian, Simon, and Sebastian; and
my grandson, Liam
Foreword
The practice of emergency radiology encompasses the diagnostic
imaging management of acutely ill and injured patients in the
emergency setting. It is one of the newest subspecialties of
diagnostic radiology and one of the fastest growing. Its growth
parallels the escalation in emergency medical practice as emergency
departments experience an ever-increasing patient volume each
year. Many institutions have experienced an annual growth rate of
emergency department volume greater than 5%. The sophistication
of emergency imaging has also been increasing as trauma surgeons
and emergency physicians expect and require the availability of all
imaging modalities including radiography, ultrasound, computed
tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging at all hours, every day
of the week. Emergency physicians are also requesting rapid
turnaround times with final image interpretations available days,
evenings, and nights. Recent investigations have shown that the
timely performance and interpretation of emergency imaging
examinations cannot only increase emergency department
throughput, decompressing busy centers, but also contribute to
improved patient outcomes and decreased healthcare costs.
Emergency radiology as a radiology subspecialty has been
experiencing increasing recognition for its advances in patient care.
Both the Radiological Society of North America and the American
Roentgen Ray Society include educational and scientific programs
devoted to emergency imaging at their annual meetings. The
American Society of Emergency Radiology (ASER) was established
28 years ago and currently has over 1000 members, a vibrant
annual meeting with postgraduate course, and an official journal,
Emergency Radiology , established in 1994. The journal has
showcased original research relevant to emergency and trauma
imaging. Emergency radiology fellowships have been established at
many academic radiology departments, and an increasing number of
radiology trainees are entering the practice of emergency radiology.
It would appear that the time is most appropriate for a
compilation of scholarly communications on evidence-based
emergency radiology available in textbook format to assist those in
emergency practice. The editors have skillfully accomplished this
goal. The text is organized into two main sections beginning with an
introductory segment on the principles of evidence-based imaging,
appraising the literature critically, emergency imaging information
systems, and consequences of inappropriate imaging. The second
segment is comprised of 36 chapters (in 5 subsections) covering
common emergency conditions requiring high-quality, state-of-the-
art imaging management. This unique text is not only intended to
educate emergency physicians and emergency radiologists but all
healthcare workers providing care in the emergency setting.
I have no doubt that this task will be successfully accomplished
with evidence-based emergency radiology.
Robert A. Novelline
Foreword
Emergency physicians often depend on sophisticated imaging for
many of the patients evaluated in emergency departments (EDs). In
fact, nearly 50% of the 130,000 million annual ED visits in the USA
are accompanied by radiological imaging of some type, making the
field of emergency radiology one that impacts a large percentage of
the US population. While emergency imaging has become more
sophisticated over the past decades, allowing clinicians access to
immediate diagnostic tools, this has also come with costs, both
financial and otherwise. As with all tests, sensitivity and specificity
are not perfect, leading to under- and overdiagnosis. Although the
risks to patients of underdiagnosis are more apparent to clinicians
and patients alike, overdiagnosis has its own insidious and
potentially harmful consequences. Incidental findings on radiological
images can lead to unnecessary and potentially harmful testing and
treatment, as well as undue patient anxiety. Concerns regarding
radiation exposure from radiography, particularly computer
tomography (CT), have also come to the forefront in the past
decade, with many studies raising concerns over radiation-induced
malignancies. Since 1980, the use of CT has increased approximately
eightfold. This is of particular concern in children, given their greater
sensitivity to radiation than adults, their longer life expectancies
during which malignancies can be expressed, and the higher dose of
radiation they frequently receive unless the CT scan radiation doses
are appropriately adjusted to meet their body sizes.
Fortunately, CT use has decreased in recent years for a number
of reasons, including the increasing use of ultrasound and other
imaging modalities, quality improvement initiatives (which include
monitoring and feedback of physician radiology use), and shared
decision-making between clinicians and their patients regarding the
tradeoffs of performing or avoiding specific imaging. Finally, the past
decade has seen a sharp increase in the use of clinical decision rules
and computer-based clinical decision support tools for the use of
emergency imaging. This has led to more rational, evidence-based,
and cost-effective use of diagnostic imaging. In addition, the
Choosing Wisely Campaign of the ABIM (American Board of Internal
Medicine) has been championing evidence-based and cost-effective
use of diagnostic testing, including the use of imaging in the ED.
One specific example of research and efforts dedicated toward
evidence-based imaging comes from the Pediatric Emergency Care
Applied Research Network (PECARN), which has made emergency
imaging decision rules one of its foci in the last decade given the
previous lack of evidence around imaging of injured children. Studies
from several countries examining the implementation of the PECARN
cranial CT decision rules for children with minor head trauma have
demonstrated safe decreased use of CT in these children.
In 2015, the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine hosted
the Academic Emergency Medicine consensus conference entitled
“Diagnostic Imaging in the Emergency Department: A Research
Agenda to Optimize Utilization.” Leaders in emergency medicine,
radiology, and health services research and other experts came
together to discuss and debate the issues described previously and
to develop a consensus research agenda. After much preparation
and discussion, six content areas emerged as those of greatest
importance and in need of future study. These included the
development and validation of clinical decision rules for emergency
diagnostic imaging; the use of administrative data for emergency
imaging research; patient-centered outcomes research; training,
education, and competency; knowledge translation and barriers to
imaging optimization; and comparative effectiveness research in
alternatives to traditional CT use. Many of the issues considered at
that conference are intertwined with the contents of this novel and
timely textbook.
Evidence-Based Emergency Imaging will undoubtedly serve as an
outstanding resource for all clinicians who care for acutely ill and
injured adults and children. Within the pages of this text, the reader
will find the principles of evidence-based imaging and the specific
imaging needed for a variety of emergent conditions. This melding of
the principles of radiology, clinical epidemiology, and health services
research will help clinicians identify who to image in the emergency
setting, what piece of technology to use, and what issues to
consider and anticipate. I greatly welcome and applaud the arrival of
this new textbook.
Nathan Kuppermann
Preface
Demand for emergency healthcare is rising consistently across the
developed world, with the number of presentations to emergency
departments (EDs) increasing by 3–6% per year over the last
decade. The role of EDs within the US healthcare system is also
changing with more than half of patients admitted to the hospital in
the USA now starting their hospital stay in the ED. The ED is a
location where subspecialty consultation and advanced diagnostic
imaging technology are available at all hours. In the USA, EDs are
unique sources for healthcare because services are provided to all
persons regardless of insurance coverage or ability to pay. In
addition, the proportion of elderly people in developed world
populations is growing. This age shift has important implications for
EDs, with a resultant increase in medical complexity of patients
attending the emergency room.
Medical imaging has grown exponentially in the last three
decades with the development of many promising and often
noninvasive diagnostic studies. Several studies from the developed
world have shown a steady increase in the use of imaging especially
cross-sectional imaging such as computed tomography (CT) in the
ED with the need for rapid and accurate diagnosis. These studies
have also shown a trend toward less invasive diagnostic testing.
Over the last decade, there have been profound changes in the
diagnostic testing and work-up of patients presenting to their
physician/healthcare provider with emergent symptoms or to the ED.
The most profound change has been the increased availability,
speed, and accuracy of imaging. This is in part due to technical
improvements such as the development of multi-detector CT. This
reflects a decade or more of increased utilization of imaging
especially advanced imaging such as CT, magnetic resonance
imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography (PET) imaging.
Although in the last few years high-end imaging use has plateaued
in general, this is not the case in the ED. The dramatic increase in
advanced imaging modalities such as MRI and PET, previously not
commonly employed in the ED setting, continues. This increase in
imaging is understandable since ED patients are more acutely ill, and
there is constant pressure to make an accurate diagnosis as quickly
as possible to facilitate prompt disposition or treatment and to
ensure fast throughput and efficiency in ED services. There is also
strong evidence for the beneficial use of imaging in the emergency
setting which correlates with improved patient outcomes.
Therefore, the purpose of this book is to educate radiologists,
physicians, and all healthcare providers who utilize diagnostic
imaging in the ED or other acute care settings regarding the best
and most up-to-date evidence-based imaging. This book is also
relevant to internal medicine (adult and pediatric) and family
medicine physicians and healthcare providers who care for patients
with emergent symptoms. The scope includes practicing radiologists,
radiologists in training, clinicians in practice or in training, medical
students, and allied personnel such as physician assistants and
nurses who may practice in the acute care setting.
The book is organized into two sections, the first being an
introductory section with chapters on the principles of evidence-
based imaging, critical appraisal of the literature, information
systems in emergency imaging, and consequences of inappropriate
emergency imaging in adults and children. The second section,
divided into five parts, includes chapters written by authors who
practice in the fields of emergency care imaging and covers all
aspects, including neuroimaging, head and neck imaging,
musculoskeletal imaging, chest and cardiac imaging, abdominal and
pelvic imaging, pediatric imaging, and women’s imaging. Although
other books in the evidence-based series cover the organ systems
listed above, this book specifically deals with the emergent and
acute presentations. The 40 chapters cover the most prevalent
emergent conditions and diseases that affect those in developed
countries. Additionally, this book contains the most accurate and up-
to-date information with the latest evidence and protocols.
Recommendations and society guidelines are also discussed.
Emergency imaging in adults is covered with a special focus on
emergent imaging in specific patient groups including women of
childbearing age, pregnant women, and also adolescent and
pediatric populations. Unique and defining features of this book
include that it is the first book of its kind to focus on emergency
imaging in adults, children, and special populations with chapters by
a multidisciplinary team of experts, all contained in one volume. It
also represents the most up-to-date evidence-based approach to
acquiring the most appropriate and comparative effective imaging in
patients who present to the emergency department or in the acute
setting.
To make the book user-friendly and to enable fast access to
pertinent information, we have organized all of the chapters in the
same format. The chapters are framed around important emergent
clinical questions relevant to the physician’s daily practice. A short
table of contents at the beginning of each chapter helps three
different tiers of users: (1) the busy physician searching for quick
guidance, (2) the physician seeking deeper understanding, and (3)
the medical-imaging researcher requiring a comprehensive resource.
The format for each chapter starts with the important clinical issues
to be discussed. This is followed with a box of key points in bullet
form with the strength of the supporting evidence in parenthesis.
After this, there are sections covering definitions, etiology,
pathophysiology and risk factors, relevant epidemiology, and costs to
society in economic terms, followed by a section discussing the goals
of imaging and a section detailing the methodology used to obtain
the most up-to-date literature.
Next, the issue being discussed is framed with a summary of
evidence including existing literature and guidelines if any. This is
further elaborated by the supporting evidence with paragraphs
discussing the diagnostic modalities available, the imaging
findings/criteria for diagnosis, the impact of imaging on treatment
decision-making, and the treatment options if applicable. Given that
all research and evidences are not created equal, we use a four-level
classification detailing the strength of the evidence based on the
Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Criteria: Level I (strong
evidence), Level II (moderate evidence), Level III (limited evidence),
and Level IV (insufficient evidence). The strength of the evidence is
presented in parenthesis throughout the chapters so the reader gets
immediate feedback on the weight of the evidence behind each
topic. If a cost-effectiveness analysis has been performed, these
data are also presented. In addition, some chapters contain special
cases (e.g., pregnant patients or children), and important issues
which require a separate or additional discussion (such as radiation
concerns) are also presented.
Each chapter text includes tables and figures, imaging case
studies, and protocols. The tables summarize diagnostic test
accuracy and summary statistics such as the sensitivity and
specificity of different imaging studies. The figures show decision
trees summarizing the evidence, e.g., risk factors, diagnostic
performance, and algorithms/flowcharts with suggested
protocols/guidelines. Imaging case studies are cases that highlight
the diagnostic performance of the different imaging studies.
Examples include important true-positive, false-positive, true-
negative, and false-negative cases and imaging pitfalls if applicable.
Suggested imaging protocols are a brief summary of imaging steps
supported by the evidence. Future research discusses in bullet points
the critical gaps in the evidence. All chapters are extensively
referenced with the most up-to-date literature.
Finally, we had the privilege of working with a group of
outstanding contributors from major medical centers and universities
in North America and Europe. We believe that the authors’ expertise,
breadth of knowledge, and thoroughness in writing the chapters
provide a valuable source of information and can guide decision-
making for physicians and patients. In addition to guiding practice,
the evidence summarized in the chapters may have policy-making
and public health implications. We hope that this book highlights key
points and generates discussion, promoting new ideas for future
research. We value your suggestions and comments on how to
improve this book. Please email them to us and the authors so that
we can bring you the best of the evidence over the years.
Aine Marie Kelly
Paul Cronin
Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Contents
Part I Introduction
1 Principles of Evidence-Based Imaging for Adults and

Children
L. Santiago Medina, C. Craig Blackmore, Kimberly E. Applegate
and Enrique Alvarado
2 Critically Assessing the Literature for Evidence-Based

Imaging:Understanding Error and Bias
C. Craig Blackmore, L. Santiago Medina, James G. Ravenel,
Gerard A. Silvestri and Kimberly E. Applegate
3 Information Systems in Emergency Department Diagnostic

Imaging
Jamlik-Omari Johnson and Nabile M. Safdar
4 The Consequences of Inappropriate Use of Emergency

Imaging
Elizabeth K. Weidman and Michael L. Loftus
Part II Neurological Imaging
5 Acute Traumatic Brain Injury in Adults:Evidence-Based

Emergency Imaging
Ivan M. DeQuesada II and Jason W. Allen
6 Pediatric Accidental Traumatic Brain Injury:Evidence-

Based Emergency Imaging
Nadja Kadom, Enrique Alvarado and L. Santiago Medina
7 Traumatic Extracranial Vascular Injury in Adults:

Jessica Warsch, Gary H. Danton and Felipe Munera
8 Hyperacute Ischemic Stroke in Adults:Evidence-Based
Emergency Imaging
Manu S. Goyal, Andria L. Ford, Jin-Moo Lee and Katie D. Vo
9 Acute Headache Disorders in Adults and Children:

L. Santiago Medina, Enrique Alvarado, Melissa Debayle and
Elza Vasconcellos
10 Seizures in Adults and Children:Evidence-Based

Emergency Imaging
Diana M. Gomez-Hassan, Aine Marie Kelly, Daniela N. Minecan
and Bruno P. Soares
11 Acute Spine Trauma in Adults and Children:Evidence-

C. Craig Blackmore
12 Acute Back Pain in Adults and Children:Evidence-Based

Emergency Imaging
Page I. Wang and Pia C. Sundgren
13 Acute Sinusitis in Adults and Children:Evidence-Based

Emergency Imaging
Laura B. Eisenmenger and Yoshimi Anzai
Part III Cardiothoracic Imaging
14 Acute Aortic Syndrome in Adults:Evidence-Based

Emergency Imaging
Larry A. Latson Jr. and Jill E. Jacobs
15 Acute Coronary Syndrome in Adults:Evidence-Based

Emergency Imaging
Andrew J. Bierhals and Pamela K. Woodard
16 Acute Pulmonary Embolism in Adults and Children:
Evidence-Based Emergency Imaging, Evaluation, and
Diagnosis
Linda B. Haramati, Vishal K. Patel, Leonard M. Freeman,
Paul Thacker and Edward Y. Lee
17 Blunt Injuries to the Thorax and Abdomen in Adults:

Laura B. Eisenmenger, Booth Aldred and Marta E. Heilbrun
18 Acute Chest Infections in Adults and Children:Evidence-

Sjirk J. Westra and Clinton Jokerst
Part IV Abdominal and Pelvic Imaging
19 Appendicitis in Adults and Children:Evidence-Based

Emergency Imaging
Booth Aldred, Laura B. Eisenmenger and Marta E. Heilbrun
20 Evidence-Based Emergency Imaging for Non-appendiceal

Acute Abdominal Pain in Adults:Pancreatitis and
Diverticulitis
Michael N. Patlas, Ania Z. Kielar, Patrick D. McLaughlin and
Douglas S. Katz
21 Acute Biliary Disorders in Adults:Evidence-Based

Emergency Imaging of Acute Calculous and Acalculous
Cholecystitis, Bile Duct Obstruction, and Choledocholithiasis
Soudabeh Fazeli Dehkordy, Ashish P. Wasnik and Paul Cronin
22 Small and Large Bowel Obstruction in Adults:Evidence-

Anne G. Carroll, Richard G. Kavanagh, Caoilfhionn Ni Leidhin,
Noelle M. Cullinan, Samad Shah, Lisa P. Lavelle and
Dermot E. Malone
23 Acute GastrointestinalBleeding in Adults and Children:
Rory L. O’Donohoe, Anne G. Carroll, Rory P. Kennelly,
Dermot E. Malone, Ronan Ryan and Michael Cline
24 Acute Intestinal Ischemia in Adults:Evidence-Based

Emergency Imaging
Lisa P. Lavelle, Sinead H. McEvoy, Anne G. Carroll,
Richard G. Kavanagh, Jeffrey W. McCann, Dermot E. Malone and
Michael Cline
25 Acute Urinary Tract Conditions in Adults:Evidence-Based

Emergency Imaging
Peter Aaron Harri, Pardeep K. Mittal and
Courtney Coursey Moreno
26 Acute Abdominal Pain in Pregnant Patients:Evidence-

Ania Z. Kielar and Suzanne T. Chong
27 Acute Pelvic Pain in Premenapausal Women, Children

and Infants:Evidence-Based Emergency Imaging
Aine Marie Kelly, Jennifer L. Cullmann, Stefan Puig and
28 The Acute Scrotum in Adults and Children:Evidence-

Jennifer L. Cullmann and Stefan Puig
Part V Musculoskeletal Imaging
29 Upper Extremity Injuries in Adults and Children:

Kara Gaetke-Udager, Corrie M. Yablon and Stefan Puig
30 Pelvic Fractures in Adults:Evidence-Based Emergency

Imaging
Douglas Watt, Ken F. Linnau and C. Craig Blackmore
31 Lower Extremity Injuries in Adults and Children:

Sarah D. Bixby and Stefan Puig
32 Evidence-Based Emergency Imaging for Acute

Musculoskeletal Infections in Adults and Children:
Osteomyelitis, Septic Arthritis, and Soft Tissue Infection
Boaz Karmazyn and Trenton D. Roth
Part VI Pediatric Imaging
33 Evidence-Based Emergency Neuroimaging in Children

and Adults with Sickle Cell Disease and Symptoms of Stroke
Jaroslaw Krejza, Michal Arkuszewski and Elias R. Melhem
34 Non-Accidental Injury in Infants and Children:Evidence-

Wouter A. Karst and Rick R. van Rijn
35 Infantile Hypertrophic Pyloric Stenosis (IHPS) in Infants

and Children:Evidence-Based Emergency Imaging
Marta Hernanz-Schulman
36 Intussusception in Infants and Children:Diagnostic

Evidence-Based Emergency Imaging and Treatment
Kimberly E. Applegate and Gelareh Sadigh
37 Clinically Suspected Malrotation in Infants and Children:

38 Non-traumatic Hip Pain in Infants and Children:

Martin H. Reed and G. Brian Black
39 Foreign Body Aspiration in Children:Evidence-Based
Emergency Imaging
Joost van Schuppen and Rick R. van Rijn
40 Acute Urinary Tract Infection in Infants and Children:

Roshanak Benabbas, Paul Cronin, Carol E. Barnewolt,
Leonard P. Connolly, Carlos R. Estrada Jr. and
Index
Editors’ Biographies and List of
Contributors
Editors
Aine Kelly
is a professor of cardiothoracic radiology at the Michigan Medicine,
Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
She is board certified in internal medicine by the Royal College of
Physicians in Ireland and in diagnostic radiology by the Royal College
of Radiologists in the UK and the American Board of Radiology. Dr.
Kelly graduated from the School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin,
Ireland. She completed an internship at St. James’s Hospital, Dublin,
and an internal medicine residency at the Dublin Federated Hospitals
Scheme, followed by an endocrinology fellowship at the Meath
Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. After this, Dr. Kelly pursued a radiology
residency at the Leeds/Bradford/Huddersfield Radiology Training
Scheme, before joining the University of Michigan. She completed
two fellowships in thoracic imaging and body MRI imaging at the
University of Michigan.
Dr. Kelly obtained a master’s degree in clinical research design
and statistical analysis from the University of Michigan School of
Public Health. She also completed a master’s degree in higher
education from the School of Education at Michigan. Dr. Kelly has
been principal investigator on multiple grants, including the General
Electric-Association of University Radiologists Radiology Research
Academic Fellowship (GERRAF), the Educational Scholar Award from
the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA), and the American
Roentgen Ray Society (ARRS) Leonard Berlin Scholarship in
professionalism and ethics. She has been co-investigator on multiple
other grants, including National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded
studies and the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST). Her research
focused on evidence-based imaging, noninvasive cardiothoracic
imaging, patient preferences, comparative effectiveness, efficiency,
value-based insurance design, quality, and safety.
Dr. Kelly served on the executive board for the Association of
University Radiologists (AUR) and is currently president elect of the
Alliance of Medical Student Educators in Radiology (AMSER), past
president of the Alliance of Clinician Educators in Radiology (ACER),
past president of the Radiology Alliance for Health Services Research
(RAHSR). She is past chairperson of the health services research
committee of the RSNA and has served as grant reviewer for the
Radiological Society of North America (RSNA). She has been an
international and national invited speaker and author on the topic of
evidence-based imaging. Dr. Kelly currently serves as deputy editor
for education at Academic Radiology. Dr. Kelly has authored or
coauthored more than 70 peer-reviewed scientific manuscripts and 5
book chapters.
Division of Cardiothoracic Radiology, Department of Radiology, Michigan

Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Paul Cronin
is an associate professor of radiology at the Michigan Medicine. He
also serves as the cardiothoracic radiology fellowship director.
Dr. Cronin was born in Dublin, Ireland. After graduating from
medical school at Trinity College Dublin, he completed an internal
medicine residency and received his membership to the Royal
College of Physicians of Ireland (MRCPI). He completed a radiology
residency in Leeds, UK, and also received his fellowship to the Royal
College of Radiologists (FRCR). Following that, he then went to the
University of Michigan and completed two fellowships (in
cardiothoracic and magnetic resonance imaging) and has stayed
there as faculty. He received a master’s degree in clinical research
design and statistical analysis from the University of Michigan School
of Public Health.
Dr. Cronin teaches medical students, residents, and fellows on a
daily basis while maintaining a busy clinical practice. He has received
an Excellence in Thoracic Radiology Award and multiple annual
commendations for excellence in teaching at the University of
Michigan. Dr. Cronin has received multiple honors and awards and
has been invited to visiting professor programs in Australia, Europe,
and North America. He has been on the “Best Doctors in America”
list since 2011. He was awarded the GE-AUR Radiology Research
Academic Fellowship (GERRAF). Dr. Cronin’s research interests
include evidence synthesis and outcomes research of multiple
aspects of cardiothoracic radiology. He has been co-investigator on
other grants, including the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) and
Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis
(PIOPED) III Trial. He has authored 142 scientific and educational
papers, abstracts, posters, and book chapters; he has given over
190 local, national, and international lectures and is a member or
chair of over 20 professional radiology society committees. He serves
on the executive board for the Radiology Alliance for Health Services
Research and is currently the immediate past president. He also
serves on the research committee and as grant reviewer for the
Radiological Society of North America (RSNA). Dr. Cronin is a
reviewer for a dozen journals. He is the guest editor for the RAHSR
edition of Academic Radiology and the deputy editor for health
services research. He is an associate editor for the evidence-based
practice subsection of Radiology . He has recently completed a 3-
year term as the health services policy and research subcommittee
chair of the scientific program committee at the RSNA. Dr. Cronin is
also a fellow of the American College of Radiology.
Division of Cardiothoracic Radiology, Department of Radiology, Michigan

Associate Editors
Stefan Puig
is an associate professor of radiology and holds a master’s degree in
healthcare management.
Dr. Puig was born in Vienna, Austria. After graduating from
medical school at the University of Vienna, he completed his internal
medicine residency at the University Clinic of Radiology, Vienna, and
continued working there as a senior radiologist. In 2003, he became
associate professor of radiology, and in 2006 he received a master’s
degree in healthcare management from the Danube University
Krems, Austria.
In 2008, he left the country to gain some working experience
abroad and worked in the radiology departments of the American
Hospital in Dubai, the University Clinic of Ulm in Germany, and the
University Clinic of Bern in Switzerland. In 2015, he moved to Zurich,
Switzerland, where he has been working as a radiology consultant at
the Hirslanden Clinic while still teaching at the University Clinic of
Bern, Switzerland.
In addition to gaining broad practical experience in the various
fields of radiology in Austria and abroad, Dr. Puig authored and
coauthored a long list of publications for scientific medical journals.
His scientific expertise is focused on emergency imaging, pediatric
radiology, interventional radiology, and evidence-based radiology. He
has been a reviewer for a number of scientific journals and authored
systematic reviews and decision support tools for the Austrian
Ministry of Health and the General Association of Austrian Social
Insurance Institutions.
University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

Hirslanden “Klinik Im Park”, Zurich, Switzerland
is a tenured professor of radiology and pediatrics, division chief of

pediatric radiology at the University of Kentucky in Lexington, and
radiology liaison for quality at the Kentucky Children’s Hospital. Dr.
Applegate is a leader in radiology—she currently serves on the
American College of Radiology Board of Chancellors, after
completing a 2-year term as the first woman to be elected ACR
Council Speaker. She is also the President of the Association for
University Radiologists (AUR) Research and Education Foundation
and a member of the National Quality Forum Patient Safety
Committee and both the National and the International Councils for
Radiation Protection.
Dr. Applegate’s policy and research work has resulted in an
improved understanding of the structure, process, and outcomes of
how pediatric imaging is practiced, including the volume of ionizing
imaging in children, the variation in radiation dose in pediatric CT,
and the standardization of practice for both children and adults. She
has worked tirelessly around the world with collaborators in the
IAEA, WHO, and IRPA to improve access to best practices. In 2017,
Dr. Applegate became a member of the ICRP Main Commission as
the chair of the committee 3 (medicine).
Kimberly has received a number of awards that include an ABR
Lifetime Achievement Award, Academy of Radiology Research
Distinguished Investigator, ARRS Scholar, RSNA Editorial Fellowship,
SPR Presidential Recognition, the Indiana ACR Chapter Gold Medal,
and AUR Gold Medal. She enjoys mentoring talented colleagues and
trainees—who have received over 20 mentee awards to date. At the
2015 RSNA meeting, Kimberly received the American Association for
Women in Radiology’s Marie Sklodowska Curie Award for her unique
roles in leadership and outstanding contributions to the
advancement of women in the radiology professions.
Dr. Applegate has published over 200 peer-reviewed papers and
book chapters and presented scientific papers and lectures at
medical and scientific assemblies around the world. She has an
interest in health services research in radiology, coediting the
evidence-based imaging textbook series. In 2006, she began work
on the Steering Committee for the Image Gently Campaign to
improve safe and effective imaging care of children worldwide. The
campaign has received a number of awards for its advocacy,
education, and collaboration to change imaging practice. She is also
on the Executive Committees of the World Federation of Paediatric
Imaging and Image Wisely . She and her husband, Dr. George
Parker, have three sons, David, and twins Andrew and Eric.
Contributors
Booth Aldred, MD
Department of Radiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Jason W. Allen, MD, PhD

Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University
Hospital, Atlanta, GA, USA
Enrique Alvarado, MD, DABR

Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Puerto Rico Children’s Hospital,
Bayamón, Puerto Rico
Yoshimi Anzai, MD, MPH

Kimberly E. Applegate, MD, MS

Department of Radiology, University of Kentucky Children’s Hospital,
Lexington, KY, USA
Michal Arkuszewski, MD, PhD

Department of Neuroradiological Sciences, Institute of Innovative
Medicine, Bialystok, Poland
Carol E. Barnewolt, MD
Department of Radiology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
Roshanak Benabbas, MD
Department of Emergency Medicine, SUNY Downstate Medical Center,
Brooklyn, NY, USA
Andrew J. Bierhals, MD, MPH
Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO,
USA
Sarah D. Bixby, MD
Department of Radiology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
G. Brian Black, BSc, MD, FRCS(C), FACS

Department of Surgery, Children’s Hospital of Winnipeg, University of
Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
C. Craig Blackmore, MD, MPH

Department of Radiology, Center for Health Care Improvement Science,
Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
Paul Cronin
Anne G. Carroll, MB BCh BAO, LRCPI, FFRRCSI

Department of Radiology, St. Vincent’s University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
Suzanne T. Chong, MD, MS

Department of Radiology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Michael Cline, MD
Department of Radiology, Interventional Radiology Resident, Michigan
Leonard P. Connolly, MD
Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA,
USA
Noelle M. Cullinan, MB BCh BAO, MRCPI, LRCSI

Department of Pediatrics, Our Lady’s Children’s Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
Jennifer L. Cullmann, MD
Department of Diagnostic, Interventional, and Pediatric Radiology,
Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
Gary H. Danton, MD, PhD

Department of Radiology, University of Miami and Jackson Memorial
Hospital, Miami, FL, USA
Melissa Debayle, AB, MD

Department of Radiology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, FL,
USA
Soudabeh Fazeli Dehkordy, MD, MPH

Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego,
CA, USA
Ivan M. DeQuesada II, MD

Radiology Associates of North Texas, P.A., Fort Worth, TX, USA
Laura B. Eisenmenger, MD
Carlos R. Estrada Jr., MD, MBA

Department of Urology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
Andria L. Ford, MD, MSCI

Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St.
Louis, MO, USA
Leonard M. Freeman, MD
Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine (Moses Div),
Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA
Kara Gaetke-Udager, MD
Diana M. Gomez-Hassan, MD, PhD
Neuroradiology Division, Department of Radiology, Michigan Medicine,
University of Michigan Hospitals, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Manu S. Goyal, MD, MSc

Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of
Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
Linda B. Haramati, MD
Department of Radiology and Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert
Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
Peter Aaron Harri, MD

Marta E. Heilbrun, MD
Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School
of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
Marta Hernanz-Schulman, MD, FAAP, FACR

Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Monroe Carell Jr. Children’s Hospital at
Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
Jill E. Jacobs, MD
Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New
York, NY, USA
Jamlik-Omari Johnson, MD
of Medicine, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA, USA
Emory Healthcare and Grady Health System, Atlanta, GA, USA
Departments of Radiology and Imaging Sciences and Emergency Medicine,
Atlanta, GA, USA
Clinton Jokerst, MD
Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
Nadja Kadom, MD
Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta (Egleston), Atlanta, GA, USA
Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
Boaz Karmazyn, MD
Department of Radiology, Riley Hospital for Children, Indianapolis, IN,
USA
Wouter A. Karst, MD
Department of Forensic Medicine, Netherlands Forensic Institute, The
Hague, The Netherlands
Douglas S. Katz, MD
Department of Radiology, Winthrop-University Hospital, Mineola, NY,
USA
Richard G. Kavanagh, MB, BCh BAO, MRCSI, MCh, BSc

Aine Marie Kelly, BA, MB BCH BAO, MS, MA

Rory P. Kennelly, MCL, FRCSI

Department of Surgery, St. Vincent’s University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
Ania Z. Kielar, MD, FRCPC

Department of Imaging, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada
Jaroslaw Krejza, MD, PhD

Department of Neuroradiological Sciences, Institute of Innovative
Medicine, Bialystok, Poland
Larry A. Latson Jr., MD, MS

Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New
York, NY, USA
Lisa P. Lavelle, MB BCh BAO, MRCPI, FFRRCSI

Edward Y. Lee, MD, MPH

Department of Radiology, Division of Thoracic Imaging, Boston Children’s
Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
Jin-Moo Lee, MD, PhD

Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St.
Louis, MO, USA
Ken F. Linnau, MD, MS

Department of Radiology, Harborview Medical Center, University of
Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
Michael Loftus, MD, MBA

Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital - Weill Cornell
Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
Dermot E. Malone, MD,FRCPI,FFRRCSI,FRCR,FRCPC,FSAR

Jeffrey W. McCann, FFRRCSI, FRCR

Sinead H. McEvoy, MB BCh BAO, FFRRCSI

Patrick D. McLaughlin, MD, FRCR

Department of Radiology, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC,
Canada
L. Santiago Medina, MD, MPH

Nicklaus Children’s Hospital, Miami Children’s Health Systems, Miami,
FL, USA
Florida International University, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine,
Miami, FL, USA
Elias R. Melhem, MD
Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Medicine, University of Maryland
School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
Daniela N. Minecan, MD
Department of Neurology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Pardeep K. Mittal, MD
Courtney Coursey Moreno, MD

Felipe Munera, MD
Caoilfhionn Ni Leidhin, MB BCh BAO, MRCSI

Department of Radiology, St. James’s Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
Rory L. O’Donohoe, MB BCh BAO, MRCPI, FFRRCSI

Vishal K. Patel, BA
Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA
Michael N. Patlas, MD, FRCPC

Department of Radiology, Division of Trauma/Emergency Radiology,
Hamilton General Hospital, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
Stefan Puig, MD, MSc
Department of Diagnostic, Interventional, and Pediatric Radiology,
Inselspital, University Hospital, Bern, University of Bern, Bern,
Switzerland
Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Klinik im Park, Hirslanden
AG, Zurich, Switzerland
James G. Ravenel, MD
Department of Radiology and Radiologic Sciences, Medical University of
South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
Martin H. Reed, MD, FRCP(C), FACR

Departments of Radiology and of Pediatrics and Child Health, University of
Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Children’s Hospital of Winnipeg,
Winnipeg, MB, Canada
Trenton D. Roth, MD
Musculoskeletal Imaging, Indiana University Methodist Hospital, Indiana
University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University
Physicians-Radiology, Indianapolis, IN, USA
Ronan Ryan, MB BCh BAO, FFRRSCI

Gelareh Sadigh, MD
of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
Nabile M. Safdar, MD, MPH

of Medicine, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA, USA
Samad Shah, MD
Department of Radiology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA, USA
Gerard A. Silvestri, MD, MS
Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston,
SC, USA
Bruno P. Soares, MD
Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The
Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
Pia C. Sundgren, MD, PhD

Institute of Clinical Sciences, Radiology, Lund University, Skåne
University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
Paul Thacker, MD, MHA

Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
Rick R. van Rijn, MD, PhD

Department of Pediatric Radiology, Emma Children’s Hospital/Academic
Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Department of Forensic Medicine, Netherlands Forensic Institute,
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Joost van Schuppen, MD

Department of Pediatric Radiology, Emma Children’s Hospital/Academic
Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Elza Vasconcellos, MD
Department of Neurology, Nicklaus Children’s Hospital/WeMind Institute,
Miami, FL, USA
Katie D. Vo, MD
Page Inman Wang, MD

Alta Vista Radiology, Paradise Valley, AZ, USA
Jessica Warsch, MD, PhD

Ashish P. Wasnik, MD, FSAR

Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging, Michigan
Douglas Watt, MD
Department of Radiology, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA,
USA
Elizabeth K. Weidman, MD
Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital - Weill Cornell
Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
Sjirk J. Westra, MD, FACR

Department of Pediatric Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital,
Pamela K. Woodard, MD
Corrie M. Yablon, MD
Part I
Introduction
© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018
Aine Kelly, Paul Cronin, Stefan Puig and Kimberly E. Applegate (eds.), Evidence-
Based Emergency Imaging, Evidence-Based Imaging: Improving the Quality of
Imaging in Patient Care, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67066-9_1
1. Principles of Evidence-Based Imaging

for Adults and Children
L. Santiago Medina1, 2 , C. Craig Blackmore3 ,
Kimberly E. Applegate4 and Enrique Alvarado5
(1) Nicklaus Children’s Hospital, Miami Children’s Health Systems,
Miami, FL, USA
(2) Florida International University Herbert Wertheim College of
Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
(3) Department of Radiology, Center for Health Care Improvement
Science, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
(4) Department of Radiology, University of Kentucky Children’s Hospital,
Lexington, KY, USA
(5) Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Puerto Rico Children’s Hospital,
Bayamón, Puerto Rico
L. Santiago Medina (Corresponding author)

Email: Santiago.medina@mch.com
C. Craig Blackmore
Email: Craig.blackmore@virginiamason.org
Email: keapple@uky.edu
Enrique Alvarado
Email: neuropedrad@gmail.com
Keywords Evidence-based imaging process – Evidence-based

imaging paradigm – Formulating clinical question – Identifying
medical literature – Assessing medical literature – Economic analysis
– Applying the evidence
What Is Evidence-Based Imaging?

The standard medical education in Western medicine has
emphasized skills and knowledge learned from experts, particularly
those encountered in the course of postgraduate medical education,
and through national publications and meetings. This reliance on
experts, referred to by Dr. Paul Gerber of Dartmouth Medical School
as “eminence-based medicine” [1], is based on the construct that
the individual practitioner, particularly a specialist devoting extensive
time to a given discipline, can arrive at the best approach to a
problem through his or her experience. The practitioner builds up an
experience base over years and digests information from national
experts who have a greater base of experience due to their focus in
a particular area. The evidence-based imaging (EBI) paradigm , in
contradistinction, is based on the precept that a single practitioner
cannot through experience alone arrive at the best course of action.
Assessment of appropriate medical care should instead be derived
through an evidence-based process. The role of the practitioner,
then, is not simply to accept information from an expert but rather
to assimilate and critically assess the research evidence that exists in
the literature to guide a clinical decision [2–4].
Fundamental to the adoption of the principles of EBI is the
understanding that medical care is not optimal. The life expectancy
at birth in the United States for males and females in 2005 was 75
and 80 years, respectively (Table 1.1). This is slightly lower than the
life expectancies in other industrialized nations such as the United
Kingdom and Australia (Table 1.1). In fact, the World Health
Organization ranks the United States 50th in life expectancy and
72nd in overall health. The United States spent at least 16.2% of the
gross domestic product (GDP ) in order to achieve this life
expectancy. This was significantly more than the United Kingdom
and Australia, which spent about half that (Table 1.1). In addition,
the US per capita health expenditure was $8745, which was twice
the expenditure in the United Kingdom or Australia. In short, the
United States spends significantly more money and resources than
other industrialized countries to achieve a similar or slightly worse
outcome in life expectancy. This implies that a significant amount of
resources is wasted in the US health-care system . In 2007, the
United States spent $2.3 trillion in health care or 16% of its GDP. By
2016, the US health percent of the GDP is expected to grow to 20%
or $4.2 trillion [5]. Recent estimates prepared by the Commonwealth
Fund Commission (USA) on a High Performance Health System
indicate that $1.5 trillion could be saved over a 10-year period if a
combination of options, including evidence-based medicine and
universal health insurance, was adopted [6].
Table 1.1 Life expectancy and health-care spending in three developed countries
Life expectancy at Percentage of GDP in Per capita health

birth (year) health care (year) expenditure (year)
Male Female (%)
United 76.3 81.1 16.2 (2012) $8745 (2012)
States (2011) (2011)
United 79.1 82.8 8.9 (2012) $3289 (2012)
Kingdom (2012) (2012)
Australia 79.9 84.3 8.7 (2011) $3997 (2011)
(2012) (2012)
Data from: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development:

http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=HEALTH
GDP gross domestic product
Simultaneous with the increase in health-care costs has been an
explosion in available medical information. The National Library of
Medicine PubMed search engine now lists over 18 million citations.
Practitioners cannot maintain familiarity with even a minute subset
of this literature without a method of filtering out publications that
lack either relevance or appropriate methodological quality. EBI is a
promising method of identifying appropriate information to guide
practice and to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of imaging.
Evidence-based imaging is defined as medical decision-making
based on clinical integration of the best medical imaging research
evidence with the physician’s expertise and with patient’s
expectations [2–4]. The best medical imaging research evidence
often comes from the basic sciences of medicine. In EBI, however,
the basic science knowledge has been translated into patient-
centered clinical research , which determines the accuracy and role
of diagnostic and therapeutic imaging in patient care [3]. New
research may make current diagnostic tests obsolete and provide
evidence that new tests are more accurate, less invasive, safer, and
less costly [3]. The physician’s expertise entails the ability to use the
referring physician’s clinical skills and past experience to rapidly
identify individuals who will benefit from the diagnostic information
of an imaging test [4]. Patient’s expectations are important because
each individual has values and preferences that should be integrated
into the clinical decision-making [3]. When these three components
of medicine come together, clinicians, imagers, and patients form a
diagnostic team, which will optimize clinical outcomes and quality of
life for our patients.
The Evidence-Based Imaging Process

The EBI process involves a series of steps : (a) formulation of the
clinical question, (b) identification of the medical literature, (c)
assessment of the literature, (d) types of economic analyses in
medicine, (e) summary of the evidence, and (f) application of the
evidence to derive an appropriate clinical action. This book is
designed to bring the EBI process to the clinician and imager in a
user-friendly way. This introductory chapter details each of the steps
in the EBI process. Chapter 2, “Assessing the Imaging Literature:
Understanding Error and Bias,” discusses how to critically assess the
literature. The rest of the book makes available to practitioners the
EBI approach to important emergency imaging issues. Each chapter
addresses common emergent disorders encountered by the
emergency care provider and radiologist evaluating the neurologic,
cardiothoracic, abdominal, and pelvic and musculoskeletal systems in
adults and children. Relevant clinical questions are delineated, and
then each chapter discusses the results of the critical analysis of the
identified literature. Finally, we provide simple recommendations for
the various clinical questions, including the strength of the evidence
that supports these recommendations.
Formulating the Clinical Question

The first step in the EBI process is formulation of the clinical
question . The entire process of EBI arises from a question that is
asked in the context of clinical practice. However, often formulating a
question for the EBI approach can be more challenging than one
would believe intuitively. To be approachable by the EBI format, a
question must be specific to a clinical situation, a patient group, and
an outcome or action. For example, it would not be appropriate to
simply ask which imaging technique is better—computed
tomography (CT) or radiography. The question must be refined to
include the particular patient population and the action that the
imaging will be used to direct. One can refine the question to include
a particular population (which imaging technique is better in
pediatric victims of high-energy blunt trauma) and to guide a
particular action or decision (to exclude the presence of unstable
cervical spine fracture). The full EBI question then becomes, in
pediatric victims of high-energy blunt trauma, which imaging
modality is preferred, CT or radiography, to exclude the presence of
unstable cervical spine fracture? This book addresses questions that
commonly arise when employing an EBI approach for conditions
encountered by the emergency care provider and radiologist. These
questions and issues are detailed at the start of each chapter. One
popular method used to teach how to develop a good clinical
question is called the “PICO ” (Patient, Intervention, Comparison,
Outcome) format. This method provides structure to formulate the
necessary elements for a good clinical question that includes
information about the patient, the problem to be solved, the
intervention (such as a diagnostic test) and its comparison
intervention (perhaps a newer diagnostic test), and the outcome of
interest (e.g., what the patient wants or is concerned about).
Identifying the Medical Literature

The process of EBI requires timely access to the relevant medical
literature to answer the question. Fortunately, massive online
bibliographical references such as PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and
the Web of Science databases are available. In general, titles,
indexing terms, abstracts, and often the complete text of much of
the world’s medical literature are available through these online
sources. Also, medical librarians are a potential resource to aid
identification of the relevant imaging literature. A limitation of
today’s literature data sources is that often too much information is
available and too many potential resources are identified in a
literature search. There are currently over 50 radiology journals, and
imaging research is also frequently published in journals from other
medical subspecialties. We are often confronted with more literature
and information than we can process. The greater challenge is to sift
through the literature that is identified to select that which is
appropriate.
Assessing the Literature

To incorporate evidence into practice, the clinician must be able to
understand the published literature and to critically evaluate the
strength of the evidence. In this introductory chapter on the process
of EBI, we focus on discussing types of research studies. Chapter 2,
“Assessing the Imaging Literature: Understanding Error and Bias,” is
a detailed discussion of the issues in determining the validity and
reliability of the reported results.
What Are the Types of Clinical Studies?

An initial assessment of the literature begins with determination of
the type of clinical study : descriptive, analytical, or experimental
[7]. Descriptive studies are the most rudimentary, as they only
summarize disease processes as seen by imaging or discuss how an
imaging modality can be used to create images. Descriptive studies
include case reports and case series. Although they may provide
important information that leads to further investigation, descriptive
studies are not usually the basis for EBI.
Analytic or observational studies include cohort, case–control,
and cross-sectional studies (Table 1.2). Cohort studies are defined by
risk factor status, and case–control studies consist of groups defined
by disease status [8]. Both case–control and cohort studies may be
used to define the association between an intervention, such as an
imaging test, and patient outcome [9]. In a cross-sectional
(prevalence) study, the researcher makes all of his measurements on
a single occasion. The investigator draws a sample from the
population (i.e., headache in 15–45-year-old females) and
determines distribution of variables within that sample [7]. The
structure of a cross-sectional study is similar to that of a cohort
study except that all pertinent measurements (i.e., number of head
CT and MRI examinations) are made at once, without a follow-up
period. Cross-sectional studies can be used as a major source for
health and habits of different populations and countries, providing
estimates of such parameters as the prevalence of stroke, brain
tumors, and congenital anomalies [7, 10].
Table 1.2 Study design
Prospective Randomization of Controls

follow-up subjects
Case report or series No No No
Cross-sectional study No No Yes
Case–control study No No Yes
Cohort study Yes/no No Yes
Randomized controlled Yes Yes Yes
trial
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
—o—
[a104]
Aan woorden en aan wind, neem altijd wat tegen het krimpen.
—o—
"Het is koel op zee," zei de snijder, en hij voer over den Amstel.
—o—
Zeeroovers tegen huns gelijken doen zelden goede zaken.
—o—
Hij ziet gaarne zout water, maar in zijn moeders vischketel.
—o—
Daar dienen geen twee groote masten op één schip.
—o—
Wie raakt er in den mars zonder touwtrappen en klimmen?
—o—
[a105]
"Alle vrachten moet men lichten!" zei de schipper en hij smeet het
eerst zijn vrouw over boord.
—o—
"Een stuivertje kan raar rollen," zei de matroos; want hij vond bij
Kaap de Goede Hoop het stuivertje terug, dat hij bij Vlaardingen
verloren had.
[a106]
Den dag, dat onze Koningin zich had voorgenomen, een officieel
bezoek te brengen aan een der oorlogschepen der Nederlandsche
Marine, was het zulk afschuwelijk weer, dat niet slechts de leden der
hofhouding, maar ook de marine-autoriteiten den raad meenden te
moeten geven, af te zien van deze inspectie, en het betreden van
het oorlogschip tot eenige dagen later uit te stellen, tot het booze
weer wat gebeterd zou zijn.
Natuurlijk wilde de Koningin hiervan niets weten. Al gaf de

stormwaarschuwingsdienst te Vlissingen nog zulke onheilspellende
berichten, de bezoekster had dezen dag vastgesteld voor haar
kennismaking met haar Nederlandschen oorlogsbodem en zijn
bemanning; — weer of geen weer.[a109] zij sprak als haar wensch
uit, dat de tocht buitengaats zou plaats hebben. En zoo ging dit
officieele koninklijke bezoek dan ook door.
Omdat dit het éérste bezoek was, dat onze Koningin aan boord van
een der Nederlandsche oorlogsschepen zou brengen, was ik daar
een boord genoodigd. Met nog een anderen journalist. Als goede
kameraden en vrienden hadden we op onze manier krijgsraad
gehouden. En daarna hadden we den commandant van het
oorlogsschip onze[a112] bezwaren kenbaar gemaakt. Niet dat wij er
tegenop zagen, bij zulk stormweer den tocht naar buiten mee te
maken — als immers de Koningin het goede voorbeeld gaf! — maar
we voelden ons eenigszins belachelijk, nu we daar aan boord
zouden hebben te verschijnen, gekleed volgens de hof-etiquette,
namelijk in de zeer weinig zeemansachtige dracht van rok-witte-das
en hoogen hoed!
De commandant, een wijs man, wist aanstonds raad. Hij liet ons in
olie-jassen steken, verschafte ons zuidwesters, zoodat we er waarlijk
e e n i g s z i n s als loodsen uitzagen. Aldus waren we ook beter
bestand tegen het grimmige weer, dat van alle kanten ons
pantserschip besprong, toen het den boeg buitengaats stak. Aldus
ontkwamen we ook tevens aan de anders ongetwijfeld ons deel
zijnde belachelijkheid van hooggehoede landrotten aan boord van
een oorlogschip, dat den koninklijken standaard laat wapperen!
Dadelijk buiten de Vlissingsche haven begon het oorlogschip te

slingeren en te stampen, dat het een lust was. De hooge bezoekster
had zich zoolang in de commandantskajuit begeven, ten[a113]einde
pas later aan dek te verschijnen, wanneer het schip buiten zou zijn.
Ik wil jullie wel vertellen, hoe ik mij dien tusschentijd nuttig maakte,
door dit oorlogschip eens wat beter te bekijken. Er waren eenige der
zeeofficieren, zich dadelijk beschikbaar stellende, om aan mijn
nieuwsgierigheid te voldoen.
En als ik daarvan voor jullie hier iets over vertel, dan is dit minder
om te vertellen van al de oorlogstoerustingen, welke aan boord van
een groot oorlogschip natuurlijk onmisbaar zijn, dan wel om jullie
aandacht te vestigen op eenige bizonderheden, wat betreft de
behandeling van dit schip, zijn besturing, commando- en
communicatiemiddelen, waardoor zoo'n oorlogsbodem zooveel
afwijkt van schepen der handelsvloot.
Daar is al dadelijk de zware commandotoren, waarvan het

bovenste gedeelte gepantserd is, en dat zich hoog boven het dek
verheft, alsof hij het geheele schip beheerschen wil. In het gevecht is
in dezen toren de plaats van den commandant van het schip; van
hieruit overziet hij den strijd, hier verneemt hij de resultaten van het
geschutvuur[a114] op den vijand, zendt zijn bevelen uit naar de
batterijen machinekamers, bepaalt zijn koers en regelt de vaart.
In deze kleine ruimte wordt hij terzijde gestaan voor de bediening

der spreekbuizen, sein-inrichtingen, het roer en somtijds nog de
richt-middelen der torpedo-lanceer-inrichtingen, door twee of drie
officieren, den roerganger en een of twee man. Het uitzicht naar
buiten wordt verleend door een spleet tusschen den torenwal en een
opschroefbare torenkap. De afstand tot den vijand, van af uitkijk-
bordessen met afstandmeters bepaald, en de verbetering — zoo
noodig! — in verband met de, uit een observatiepost in den mast
waargenomen aanslagen der weggeschoten granaten, dit alles
wordt naar een algemeen seinstation onder in het schip
overgeseind. Ook worden hierheen de bevelen gemeld, op welk doel
gevuurd moet worden en met welk soort munitie.
Dit alles liet ik me met de grootste belangstelling uitleggen. Welk

een monster is toch zoo'n gepantserde oorlogsbodem!
Maar hoewel onze vaart met dit zwaar-gewapend vaartuig

stormachtig was, zoodat het oorlog[a115]schip steigerde op de
grauwe, schuim-gekopte golven, — toch was de tocht een
vreedzame. Ons oorlogschip trok, God-zij-dank! niet ten oorlog uit.
Wij hadden de Koningin aan boord voor een vredelievende inspectie!
En terwijl de bezoekster nog in de tot statievertrek ingerichte

commandants-kajuit vertoefde, ging ik met mijn hulpvaardige
geleiders het verdere schip rond. Ze lieten me alles zien, waarin ik
als onbevaren, niet-militaire leek slechts belang kon stellen. En dat
was veel, — zooals je wel kunt begrijpen. Wie van jullie had daar
niet in mijn plaats aan boord willen zijn!
Zoo zag ik het bovengenoemde seinstation, geplaatst beneden in

het schip, evenals de sein- en communicatiemiddelen, onder de
waterlijn van het schip gelegen, en dus beschut voor 's vijands vuur.
Daar waren te vinden de stuurinrichtingen, de spreekbuizen en
schellen, kompassen en verschillende telefoon-aansluitingen met de
batterijen en machinekamer.
Daar aanschouwde ik den ziekenboeg, met de daarachter gelegen

operatie-kamer; verder de volks-logiezen, de tafels en banken in het
mid[a116]den geplaatst, de kisten tegen boord, de kastjes tegen den
muur, met het eetgerei van Janmaat daarin; de hangmatten netjes
opgetuigd, ter eere van het deftig bezoek aan boord.
En nu gingen we langs de batterijen, voorbij de groote
vuurmonden, door de munitiekamers, — kortom, alles wat tot een
modern oorlogschip behoort, en waardoor zoo'n stalen
oorlogsbodem in staat moet zijn, een vijandelijken aanval te
doorstaan, en, als het moet, ook zelf de kanonnen af te vuren,
teneinde de eer onzer Nederlandsche vlag hoog te houden.[a119]
Daar hoorde ik boven aan dek het joelen der matrozen!
Ik spoedde me naar boven.
Even had ik dus een blik mogen slaan aan boord van een onzer
groote oorlogschepen, een vluchtigen indruk opgedaan van het
scheepsleven aan boord. Misschien kon ik me alles nu beter
voorstellen, wanneer later gesproken werd van de daaraan
verbonden harde ontberingen; maar ook zou ik me duidelijker
kunnen voorstellen, wanneer er sprake zou zijn van al de vele
aantrekkelijkheden, welke het leven aan boord van een oorlogschip
kenmerken.
Prachtige kerels! dacht ik.

Dat vrije gevoel van den zeeman, zich losvoelend van het
beklemmende steedsche, van het alledaagsche, van het gewone
gedoe aan land; een vrije kerel midden op den oceaan, aan alle
kanten omringd door een oneindige watermassa, boven zich het
onmetelijke hemelruim.
Hoe leeren ze aan boord van zoo'n oorlogsschip de moeilijkheden

overwinnen; hoe gaan ze hier op elkaar vertrouwen; hoe worden hier
de karakters gevormd en gestaald;[a120] hoe leert men elkaar over-
en-weer waardeeren!
Toen ik aan dek kwam, bleek de storm nog kwaadaardiger te zijn

gaan spoken.
Telkens spatten de zware zeeën tegen de scheepswanden; en dan
striemde het water met driftige slierten, als zweepslagen zoo scherp,
over het dek, dat glom van het overstroomende water.[a123]
Maar daarop lette ik niet. Ik wilde mijn aandacht geven aan iets
anders dan aan het woeste geweld van den storm. Ik stond
weggescholen, terzijde van de commandobrug, gehuld in m'n
oliejas, den zuidwester stevig om den kin gebonden.
De Koningin was aan dek verschenen; zij had haar verlangen te

kennen gegeven, het manoeuvreeren van het oorlogsschip, staande
naast den kapitein, te volgen. En ik was heel nieuwsgierig, hoe onze
Koningin zich daar staande zou houden op de commando-brug van
het zwaar-slingerende schip.
Daar zag ik nu boven op de commando-brug, in den driesten wind

en het gestriem der regenbuien, terwijl telkens de driftige golven zich
te pletter kwamen beuken tegen ons bakboord, — daar zag ik
omhoog het kleine figuurtje eener jonge vrouw staan, de Koningin.
Zij was gehuld in een eenvoudig grijzen regenmantel; met de eene
hand hield ze den hoed vast, met de andere klemde zij den mantel
samen, omdat deze telkens bol opwoei in den rukkenden stormwind.
Op de reede lagen enkele onzer oorlogssche[a124]pen, op de

wilde zee te hobbelen, om hun Koningin met vlagsein en kanon-
gebulder het saluut te brengen. Voor elk dezer bodems had de
Koningin haar groet; van de hooge brug van ons schip boog ze
telkens even, een bevallige, koninklijke nijging voor elk donderend
saluut, voor elken dalenden standaard. Zij bleef rustig staan in den
storm.
En als dan de revue was afgeloopen, en de Schout-bij-nacht met

oprechte woorden van bewondering de Koningin toesprak, om haar
hulde te brengen namens de Nederlandsche Marine, haar dankend
voor haar bewijs van belangstelling, waardoor de banden nog meer
versterkt waren, welke onze marine verbonden met Hare Majesteit,
— toen antwoordde zij eenvoudig en kalm met een: "Ik dank u voor
de gevoelens, die u vertolkt namens mijne marine."
Op dit "m i j n e" werd, naar het mij voorkwam, even door onze
Koningin de klemtoon gelegd, zooals zij dit weet te doen, wanneer zij
zoo zuiver onze Nederlandsche taal uitspreekt.
En ik, — als toeschouwer tegenwoordig geweest bij deze eerste

kennismaking van de Koningin met de Zee, — ik heb na dèzen dag
nooit vergeten,[a125] hoe zij daar, op de commando-brug staande
van haar oorlogsbodem, onbewogen in de felle stormslagen, zich dit
recht verworven had.
[a126]
Ik wil jullie hier iets vertellen over de manier, waarop in ons land het
reddingwezen ter zee geregeld is.
Waarlijk niet een van de minst belangrijke onderdeelen van onze

vaderlandsche zeevaart, jongens!
In Nederland bestaan er twee vereenigingen, welke er haar

afzonderlijk werk van maken, zorg te dragen, dat er bij storm aan
onze kwade kust en bij het verkeeren van schepen in nood, hetzij
ergens op het strand, dan wel bij een der vele brokkelige
insnijdingen in onze kustlijn van rivier of binnenzeeën, dadelijk
pogingen in het werk kunnen worden gesteld, om een schipbreuk te
voorkomen, en zoo zulk een ramp onherstelbaar[a129] is, tenminste
de opvarenden veilig en wel aan land te brengen.
Hier zijn twee namen, die elke Nederlandsche jongen uit het hoofd
moet kennen: de "N o o r d - en Zuid-Hollandsche
R e d d i n g M a a t s c h a p p i j", gevestigd te Amsterdam, en de
"Z u i d - H o l l a n d s c h e Maatschappij tot Redding
v a n S c h i p b r e u k e l i n g e n", waarvan de zetel te Rotterdam is
te vinden.
Over de heldhaftige daden van de eigenlijke redders hebben jullie

in een vorig hoofdstuk al een afzonderlijk verhaal gelezen, namelijk
dat van den Levensredder uit Den Helder, "opa" Rijkers, die goed
geteld 36 reddingen en 471 geredden op z'n boekje heeft staan!
Maar hier wilde ik jullie het een en ander vertellen over de manier,
waarop een van de nieuwe reddingbooten dezer maatschappijen
haar eerste stormreis volbracht. En daaraan moet ik wel laten
voorafgaan een beschrijving van de inrichting dezer redding-
maatschappijen, — iets wat jullie om den drommel niet mogen
overslaan!
Het was bijna honderd jaar geleden, dat aan[a130] de kust bij
Huisduinen een scheepsramp plaats greep, die de menschen zoo
deed ontstellen en hen zóózeer overtuigde, dat onze
reddingsmiddelen geheel onvoldoende waren, dat men in het jaar
1824 besloot de handen ineen te slaan en het reddingwezen in
Nederland behoorlijk te regelen. In dat jaar werden toen beide
maatschappijen tegelijk gesticht; de een zetelde te Amsterdam, de
ander te Rotterdam, beide het werk aldus verdeelende, dat de eene
maatschappij zich zou belasten met de kustbewaking langs den
noordkant, en de tweede met de verzorging van het reddingwezen
langs de zuidelijke kusten van ons land.
Beide maatschappijen
richtten daarop een aantal
kust-stations op, voorzien
van het noodige
reddingmateriaal, hetwelk
bij voorkomende gevallen,
onder deskundige leiding,
ter beschikking van onze
stoere kustbewoners
gesteld kon worden, om
een poging te wagen, de
in doodsnood
verkee[a133]rende medemenschen op zee ter hulp te snellen.
Geregeld werden oefeningen gehouden met booten, schiet-
toestellen om lijnen over te brengen tusschen het schip in gevaar en
de reddingboot of de kust; de daartoe beschikbaar gestelde redders
werden ook geoefend in het bijbrengen van drenkelingen. Kortom,
het geheele moeilijke reddingwerk werd zoo goed mogelijk geregeld,
om steeds gereed te zijn, wanneer daarginds in de dolle, witte
branding een schip in gevaar verkeert.
Het aantal schipbreukelingen, reeds gered dank zij de middelen der

beide maatschappijen, bedraagt niet minder dan 7000
menschenlevens...! Je ziet dus, dat dit nog eens de moeite waard
mag heeten.
Willen jullie ook weten, waar deze stations langs onze kust te
vinden zijn?
De "Noord- en Zuid-Hollandsche Redding-Maatschappij" heeft de

hare te Rottum, Schiermonnikoog, Ameland, Terschelling, Vlieland,
Texel, Nieuwediep, Callantsoog, Petten, Egmond, Wijk-aan-Zee,
IJmuiden, Zandvoort, Noordwijk, Katwijk, Moddergat, Harlingen,
Gaast en Hinde[a134] loopen. Tezamen beschikken deze "stations"
over 34 redding-vaartuigen, waarvan 2 motor-reddingbooten en 20
lijnwerp-toestellen.
De "Zuid-Hollandsche Maatschappij tot Redding van
Schipbreukelingen" heeft "stations" te Ter-heijde, 's Gravenzande,
Hoek-van-Holland, Brielle, Hellevoetsluis, Oudorp, Brouwershaven,
Burgsluis, West-Kapelle, Vlissingen en Sluis aan de Wielingen. Het
materiaal bestaat uit 16 reddingvaartuigen, waarvan 2 motor-
reddingbooten en 2 stoom-reddingbooten, en 10 lijnwerp-toestellen.
De reddingbooten, welke niet met behulp van een stoommachine of

motor worden voortbewogen — natuurlijk zijn deze laatste de beste
— worden voortbewogen door riemen en zeilen; ter[a137]wijl ze nog
onder-verdeeld kunnen worden in zelfrichtende- en niet-zelfrichtende
booten.
De eerste soort booten worden meestal gevonden op plaatsen,

waar het reddingstation gelegen is aan een haven, zoodat de
reddingboot langs een helling in de haven kan worden neergelaten.
De niet-zelfrichtende reddingboot is meer een strandboot en moet
met behulp van een wagen over het strand naar de plaats worden
gereden, waar de redders zich het dichtst bij de schipbreuk
bevinden.
Eer ik jullie iets over zoo'n redding-vaart zelve vertel, moet jullie me
nog even je aandacht schenken, om jullie te beschrijven, hoe het
meest voorkomende type reddingboot, dus de strandboot, er wel
uitziet. De boot is voorzien van een dek, zooals alle
reddingvaartuigen in Nederland er een bezitten; en hieronder
bevinden zich 8 water-ontlastbuizen, welke dienen om het
overstroomende water weer dadelijk kwijt te raken. De ruimte onder
het dek is zooveel mogelijk opgevuld met koperen luchtkisten. Ook
vin' je er een water-ballasttank in;[a139] verder een middenzwaard
voor het evenwicht der boot; en natuurlijk het noodige zeiltuig. De
eigenlijke inventaris — de beteekenis van dit woord begrijpen jullie
wel uit het volgende — bestaat uit riemen, van eschhout
vervaardigd, zwemvesten van kapok, een anker en een sleepzak.
Deze laatste dient, om, bij het landen door een hooge zee, het
dwars- en omslaan van de reddingboot te verhinderen.
De door een machine voortbewogen reddingbooten worden niet

voortgestuwd door een schroef; neen, hier wordt het systeem
toegepast, dat het water met kracht wordt uitgestooten, hetgeen de
vereischte voortbewegingskracht vormt. De machine brengt namelijk
een centrifugaalpomp in beweging, die het zeewater door een
breede buis in het vlak van het vaartuig opzuigt. Deze buis vertakt
zich weer in buizen, welke naar voren en achteren buitenboord
uitmonden. Door het water naar achteren te spuiten, beweegt de
machine dus de boot vooruit; spuit ze het water naar boven, dan
beweegt het vaartuig zich achteruit. Terwijl men ook, door aan de
eene zijde het water vooruit en de andere zijde achteruit te doen
uit[a140]spuiten, de boot kan besturen. Natuurlijk begrijpen jullie wel,
dat het een groot voordeel oplevert, dat zulke booten niet op een
schroef zijn aangewezen om vooruit te gaan.
De vaklui beweren echter, dat het aller-beste model voor een

reddingboot datgene is, waar een motor de voortbewegende kracht
oplevert voor de machine. Beide maatschappijen hebben er eenige
op haar voornaamste "stations" ter beschikking.
En al is het nu niet bepaald gisteren gebeurd, toch wil ik jullie hier
iets vertellen over een dezer motor-reddingbooten, en hoe ze in
dienst werd gesteld op een stevigen stormdag in de kwaje maand
November.
De stormwind gierde langs het zwerk, zwaar weer uit het

noordwesten, en een zee zoo ruw, als je maar wenschen kon voor
een proeftocht met een nieuwe reddingboot, die het bewijs had te
leveren wat ze waard was!
Drie dagen achtereen duurde de proefvaart. Maar de nieuwe

motorboot, "De Brandaris" geheeten, naar den geweldigen vuurtoren
op Terschelling, ranselde het ruige water, en met haar[a141] sterken
kop rameide ze de wilde waterbergen, die haar woest besprongen.
Al dadelijk buiten de Oranje-sluizen, de rumoerige Zuider-Zee op,

liep de boot z'n 8 mijl per uur, en dat tegen het tij in. 's Morgens acht
uur buiten en 's middags 4 uur al in Terschelling binnen. Dat is 72
zee-mijlen. Niet kwaad voor 'n begin!
Al dadelijk kon de boot ook laten zien, hoe ze zich hield in het
Stortemelkgat, waar 'n zee stond van wat-ben-je-me! Dat ging best.
Den volgenden dag blies de wind nog wat harder. De zeelui schatten
de kracht van den wind in meters per sekonde; het woei uit het
kwade noordwesten met een vaart van 6 tot 7 meter. 'n Holle zee.
Ja, dat was wel wat de nieuwe reddingboot begeerde, om haar proef
af te leggen!
De schipper van "De Brandaris" koerste door het Boomkensdiep tot

de vaarton aan den Engelschen Hoek, naar de gevaarlijke
Zandplaat, waar zoovele schepen vast raken in den storm; en dan
door den ingang van het Thomas Smit Gat. Het water roerde zich
ongemakkelijk. Niet meer dan 14 voet water, — dat is niet veel als
de zee hol staat![a142]
Maar hij dee 't! Aan den wal stonden al die zeerobben uit te kijken.
Dat zijn daar allemaal zoowat vaklui. Als er bij de eilanden boven
Den Helder 'n schip in nood zit, staan ze al bij bosjes op hun kans te
loeren, om mee te helpen
"gnusjen", — zoo noemen ze
daar het reddingwerk met hun
eigen woord.
Zoo heel veel vertrouwen

hadden ze aan den wal niet, toen
die "nieuwe motoor" de wilde zee
op ging...
Maar na haar eersten

proeftocht door stug weer, met
een stormwind uit den leelijken
hoek, kregen ze er wat meer
eerbied voor!
De volgende dag was echter 'n nog smeriger dag. "Zooveel te

beter", dacht het volk van "De Brandaris", — "nou kunnen we eens
laten zien wat onze boot precies kan in den storm!"
D'r stond buiten een hooge zee, en de wind was pal noord
geloopen. Weer het Stortemelk[a145]gat in, tot de stompe ton daar,
die het nummer 3 draagt; toen bij ton nummer 5, bij het Schuitengat,
naar de buitengronden. Br! zooals 't er spookte!... Maar toch heen-
en-thuis-terug, een afstand van 16 zeemijl, in zoowat twee uur. Mooi
zoo!
Toen ging de wind minderen. Maar de schipper kende dat wel.

Buiten was het heele water "dicht" en vol branding. Terug, dat ging
niet; en dwars door zee leek al te gevaarlijk, zelfs voor een
reddingboot...
En daar wil het geluk, dat gemeld wordt, hoe er buiten een schip zit
vastgeloopen. Van Ameland was het bericht geseind, en vijf
sleepbooten stoomden er op af, om 'n handje te helpen. Later bleek,
dat het schip zich zelf had kunnen vrij maken; maar dat wisten de
kapiteins van de sleepbooten toen nog niet. En ook de schipper van
"De Brandaris" wist dat evenmin. Zoo werd 't dus een soort
wedstrijd, wie er het eerst bij zou zijn.
Nu was het aardige van het geval, dat de sleepbooten, die daar
toch anders al wat zware zee gewend waren, met het nijdige weer er
de brui[a146] aan gaven, den kortsten weg te nemen; dan hadden
ze door dat gemeene Thomas Smit Gat moeten sturen. Maar de
reddingboot koos den kortsten weg, dwars er door. Terwijl de vijf
andere buiten-om stoomden.
Ze konden de kleine reddingboot zien werken in de zware

branding.
En toen dan "De Brandaris" er goed door kwam, had ie 't ook voor
goed gewonnen bij het Terschellingsche zeevolk. Daar gingen de
petten en mutsen af. En joelen en wuiven naar dat kleine, sterke,
kranige ding!
Zoo was zijn proefvaart, het pleziertochtje van de nieuwe motor-

reddingboot.
Later heeft ze wel bewezen wàt ze inderdaad waard was, als ze er

ècht uit moest, op 'n schipbreuk af, om ginds menschen te redden
van den dood![a147]
Wil ik jullie eens een beschrijving trachten te geven van een van de
grootste schepen, die de wereld-zeeën bevaren?
Ik noem er den naam niet van. Helaas! wie weet, of er vandaag of

morgen zoo'n prachtige drijvende stad niet door den een of anderen
gluiperigen onderzeeër in den grond wordt geboord?
Het Nederlandsche schip, dat ik op het oog heb, en waarop ik een

reis over den Atlantischen Oceaan heb gemaakt, van de
Amerikaansche hoofdstad New-York naar Europa, dit schip was zóó
groot, dat de week, welke ik er aan boord doorbracht, veel te weinig
tijd was, om het geheele vaartuig te leeren kennen.[a150]
De afmetingen van dien kolos waren eventjes 250 meter lengte,

met een diepgang van 10 meter; en de inhoud was tusschen de
30.000 en 40.000 scheepstonnen.
Het aantal menschen dat de reis tegelijk met me maakte, bedroeg

ongeveer 5000 personen. Ik heb ze niet nauwkeurig geteld. Ze
waren over het geheele schip verdeeld, — van de commando-brug,
tot diep onderin de laagste scheepsruimten, waar de machine-vuren
worden gestookt.
Om het schip voort te bewegen waren machines noodig, en deze
werden aan den gang gehouden door electriciteit en stoom,
waarvoor dag en nacht een aantal geweldige vuren moesten worden
gestookt. Om de benoodigde voorraad steenkool aan boord te laden,
waren noodig geweest 30 treinen, elk bestaande uit 28 tien-ton-
wagens, geladen met steenkool.
Teneinde al die menschen gedurende de reis te voeden, had men

aan boord als proviand meegenomen een hoeveelheid vleesch,
welke afkomstig was van 50 koeien, 150 schapen, evenveel
varkens, alles geslacht in halve of kwart-beesten. Deze vleesch-
voorraden waren in de koelkamers opge[a151]hangen, opdat
gedurende de geheele reis — zelfs voor het geval, dat zoo'n reis
langer dan eenige weken mocht duren — steeds versch vleesch op
tafel zou zijn. Verder bestond het proviand uit onnoemelijke
hoeveelheden boter, kaas, vruchten (6000 kilo), meel (40.000 kilo),
thee, koffie, wijnen, — en dit alles in reusachtige voorraden.
Om het schip te besturen, de machines te bedienen, de vuren te

stoken, de dekken en kajuiten schoon te houden, om al die
passagiers van 1ste, 2de en 3de klasse te bedienen, waren er meer
dan 1000 man personeel noodig.
Eerst natuurlijk het hoofd van alles — zoowel de baas over het
schip, als over de bemanning en de passagiers — de gezagvoerder,
terzijde gestaan door een tiental hoofdofficieren, alle voorzien van
het kapiteins-diploma; vervolgens 350 man machine-personeel,
staande onder toezicht van 30 gediplomeerde machi[a154]nisten-
officieren. Teneinde het eten behoorlijk en lekker klaar te maken,
waren er 60 koks werkzaam; terwijl een 500 bedienden, ingedeeld
volgens verschillende rangen, en aan boord aangeduid als
"hofmeesters", zoowel mannelijke als vrouwelijke, voor de bediening
der passagiers hadden te zorgen.
Dan mag ik de aanwezigheid niet vergeten van eenige doktoren,

van drie telegrafisten voor de bediening der toestellen der
draadlooze telegrafie; en om dit alles te regelen een viertal
"administrateurs". Een afzonderlijk orkest telde twintig uitnemende
beroeps-muzikanten. Er waren
afzonderlijke bedienden voor de
telefoon-toestellen, welke in elke kajuit
en in elk slaapvertrek waren
aangebracht. Ook bevonden zich
eenige drukkers aan boord, want
dagelijks verscheen een keurig
verzorgde scheeps-krant, met allerlei
nieuws van de wereld gevuld, en met
aardige prentjes van de voornaamste
gebeurtenissen, welke gedurende de
reis aan boord plaats grepen.
En eindelijk de passagiers, die van

Amerika naar Europa moesten worden
overgebracht.
Onze passagiers-lijst eerste-klas telde 700 na[a156]men; die van

de tweede klas 600, die der derde klas 2000. Van deze laatsten
waren de meesten landverhuizers, die van de Nieuwe Wereld naar
de Oude terug wenschten te keeren, nadat ze eenige jaren geleden
waarschijnlijk dezelfde reis in omgekeerde richting hadden afgelegd.
Alles tezamen ongeveer 4000 passagiers.
Wat van de inrichting van het schip zelf te vertellen?... Een levend
wonder!
De mooiste kamers aan boord waren geen zier minder smaakvol

ingericht dan de logeerkamers in onze prachtigste hôtels. Bij de
eerste klas-kamers behoorde een afzonderlijke badkamer; bij
sommige afzonderlijke salonnetjes. De groote salons, de eetzalen en
zitkamers, de muziekzaal en de bibliotheek waren elk in een
afzonderlijken bouwstijl ingericht. Er was een aparte gymnastiekzaal,
met alle mogelijke toestellen voor gymnastiek en verschillende
soorten sport. Wilde je zwemmen, dan was er een Romeinsch bad
van 68 voet lengte en 41 voet breedte, zoowel met watervalletjes als
water-ververschers.
Zoo leefde ik daar in één doorloopende verba[a157]zing, de

zeereis makende aan boord van zoo'n modern reuzen-schip!
Waarin ik het meeste belang stelde, was echter wel de vraag, hoe
het toch mogelijk was, zoo'n geweldig drijvend gevaarte niet slechts
aan den gang te brengen en aan den gang te houden, — doch hoe
het wenschelijk vernuft er in geslaagd was, machines te
vervaardigen, krachtig genoeg, om dit alles met een sneltreinvaart
dwars over den Atlantischen Oceaan te stuwen?
Want zulke groote schepen varen tegenwoordig met een snelheid

van 500 zeemijlen per etmaal. Dus zien ze kans, in ongeveer tien
dagen den afstand af te leggen tusschen New-York en onze
Europeesche havens. Kijk maar eens na op jullie atlassen, wat dit
beteekent!
Gedurende mijn reis waren er dan zelfs nog lastige en

overhaastige passagiers, mopperende, omdat het hun nog niet snel
genoeg naar den zin ging! Nu moet ik er jullie bij zeggen, dat er
inderdaad een staking onder de stokers was uitgebroken, kort vóór
het schip van Amerika zou vertrekken. De directie had toen ander
stokerspersoneel in dienst moeten nemen, en die men[a158]schen
waren niet zoo goed voor hun nieuwe taak berekend als de anderen.
Hieruit leeren jullie, hoe zelfs het stokersvak een handwerk is, dat
vakkennis vereischt. In elk geval was dit oorzaak, dat ons schip iets
minder snel liep, dan zijn gewone snelheid te halen, waartoe het
anders in staat zou zijn geweest. En zoo scheelde het ons zelfs een
halven dag op den overtocht van het eene werelddeel naar het
andere.
Jullie zouden waarschijnlijk even verbaasd als ik geweest zijn, dat

zoo iets onbelangrijks, als het steenkolen-bijgooien op de
scheepsvuren, zulk een groot schip zooveel in snelheid kan doen
schelen. En toen ik tegenover een van de machinekamer-officieren
hierover mijn verwondering uitsprak, was hij wel zoo vriendelijk, mij

Download full ebook of Evidence Based Emergency Imaging Optimizing Diagnostic Imaging Of Patients In The Emergency Care Setting Evidence Based Imaging Aine Kelly Editor Paul Cronin Editor Stefan Puig Editor Kimberly E Apple online pdf all chapter docx

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Download full ebook of Evidence Based Emergency Imaging Optimizing Diagnostic Imaging Of Patients In The Emergency Care Setting Evidence Based Imaging Aine Kelly Editor Paul Cronin Editor Stefan Puig Editor Kimberly E Apple online pdf all chapter docx

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Evidence Based Emergency Imaging

Optimizing Diagnostic Imaging of

Atlas of Emergency Imaging from Head to Toe Michael N

Evidence-Based Emergency Care: DIAGNOSTIC TESTING AND

Pediatric Diagnostic Labs for Primary Care An Evidence

Emergency Imaging Of At Risk Patients General

Transplantation Imaging Ghaneh Fananapazir Editor Ramit

Diseases of the Abdomen and Pelvis 2023-2026:

Imaging and Technology in Urology Sotonye Tolofari

Atlas of Orbital Imaging Guy Ben Simon (Editor)

Aims of the Series

Evidence-Based Emergency Imaging

Library of Congress Control Number: 2017964706

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the

The use of general descriptive names, registered names,

Printed on acid-free paper

This Springer imprint is published by the registered company

1 Principles of Evidence-Based Imaging for Adults and

2 Critically Assessing the Literature for Evidence-Based

3 Information Systems in Emergency Department Diagnostic

4 The Consequences of Inappropriate Use of Emergency

Part II Neurological Imaging

5 Acute Traumatic Brain Injury in Adults:​Evidence-Based

6 Pediatric Accidental Traumatic Brain Injury:​Evidence-

7 Traumatic Extracranial Vascular Injury in Adults:​

9 Acute Headache Disorders in Adults and Children:​

10 Seizures in Adults and Children:​Evidence-Based

11 Acute Spine Trauma in Adults and Children:​Evidence-

12 Acute Back Pain in Adults and Children:​Evidence-Based

13 Acute Sinusitis in Adults and Children:​Evidence-Based

Part III Cardiothoracic Imaging

14 Acute Aortic Syndrome in Adults:​Evidence-Based

15 Acute Coronary Syndrome in Adults:​Evidence-Based

17 Blunt Injuries to the Thorax and Abdomen in Adults:​

18 Acute Chest Infections in Adults and Children:​Evidence-

Part IV Abdominal and Pelvic Imaging

19 Appendicitis in Adults and Children:​Evidence-Based

20 Evidence-Based Emergency Imaging for Non-appendiceal

21 Acute Biliary Disorders in Adults:​Evidence-Based

22 Small and Large Bowel Obstruction in Adults:​Evidence-

24 Acute Intestinal Ischemia in Adults:​Evidence-Based

25 Acute Urinary Tract Conditions in Adults:​Evidence-Based

26 Acute Abdominal Pain in Pregnant Patients:​Evidence-

27 Acute Pelvic Pain in Premenapausal Women, Children

28 The Acute Scrotum in Adults and Children:​Evidence-

Part V Musculoskeletal Imaging

29 Upper Extremity Injuries in Adults and Children:​

30 Pelvic Fractures in Adults:​Evidence-Based Emergency

31 Lower Extremity Injuries in Adults and Children:​

32 Evidence-Based Emergency Imaging for Acute

Part VI Pediatric Imaging

33 Evidence-Based Emergency Neuroimaging in Children

34 Non-Accidental Injury in Infants and Children:​Evidence-

35 Infantile Hypertrophic Pyloric Stenosis (IHPS) in Infants

36 Intussusception in Infants and Children:​Diagnostic

37 Clinically Suspected Malrotation in Infants and Children:​

38 Non-traumatic Hip Pain in Infants and Children:​

40 Acute Urinary Tract Infection in Infants and Children:​

Division of Cardiothoracic Radiology, Department of Radiology, Michigan

Division of Cardiothoracic Radiology, Department of Radiology, Michigan

University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

is a tenured professor of radiology and pediatrics, division chief of

Jason W. Allen, MD, PhD

5 Acute Traumatic Brain Injury in Adults:Evidence-Based

6 Pediatric Accidental Traumatic Brain Injury:Evidence-

7 Traumatic Extracranial Vascular Injury in Adults:

9 Acute Headache Disorders in Adults and Children:

10 Seizures in Adults and Children:Evidence-Based

11 Acute Spine Trauma in Adults and Children:Evidence-

12 Acute Back Pain in Adults and Children:Evidence-Based

13 Acute Sinusitis in Adults and Children:Evidence-Based

14 Acute Aortic Syndrome in Adults:Evidence-Based

15 Acute Coronary Syndrome in Adults:Evidence-Based

17 Blunt Injuries to the Thorax and Abdomen in Adults:

18 Acute Chest Infections in Adults and Children:Evidence-

19 Appendicitis in Adults and Children:Evidence-Based

21 Acute Biliary Disorders in Adults:Evidence-Based

22 Small and Large Bowel Obstruction in Adults:Evidence-

24 Acute Intestinal Ischemia in Adults:Evidence-Based

25 Acute Urinary Tract Conditions in Adults:Evidence-Based

26 Acute Abdominal Pain in Pregnant Patients:Evidence-

28 The Acute Scrotum in Adults and Children:Evidence-

29 Upper Extremity Injuries in Adults and Children:

30 Pelvic Fractures in Adults:Evidence-Based Emergency

31 Lower Extremity Injuries in Adults and Children:

34 Non-Accidental Injury in Infants and Children:Evidence-

36 Intussusception in Infants and Children:Diagnostic

37 Clinically Suspected Malrotation in Infants and Children:

38 Non-traumatic Hip Pain in Infants and Children:

40 Acute Urinary Tract Infection in Infants and Children: