Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Impact of Jet
Impact of Jet
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
CIVIL DEPARTMENT-
FLUID KINEMATICS
IMPACT OF JET
BY
STUDENT NAME: GORGEES A. KAWRASH
GROUP: A
SUPERVISOR
MS. JIHAN
EXPERIMNET NO.: 4
EXPERIMENT DATE: MAY 3, 2023
Abstract
This report is about impact of jet this experiment or this test had done in
the laboratory of fluid in university of Duhok campus, by second stage
student of civil department, and the aim of this report is find or determine
the discharge of water and the forces acting to the jet
1
Table of Contents
Abstract .......................................................................................... 1
1 Introduction ................................................................................ 3
2 Objectives .................................................................................. 3
3 Description of Equipment ............................................................. 4
4 Procedure and Readings ............................................................... 5
5 Calculation and Result .................................................................. 6
5.1 For the flat plat ...................................................................... 6
5.2 For the hemispherical cup ....................................................... 6
6 Discussion and conclusion ...........................................................10
7 References ................................................................................10
2
1 Introduction
2 Objectives
3
3 Description of Equipment
• Water
•
4
4 Procedure and Readings
1. The apparatus is first leveled and the lever brought to the balanced
position (as indicated by the tally), with the jockey weight at its zero
setting. Note the weight of the jockey, and the following dimensions:
diameter of the nozzle, height of the vane above the tip of the nozzle
when the lever is balanced, and distance from the pivot of lever to the
center of the vane
2. Water is then admitted through the bench supply valve, and the flow
rate increased to the maximum. The force on the vane displaces the lever,
which is then restored to its balanced position by sliding the jockey weight
along the lever.
4. The experimental should be run twice, first with the flat plate and
then with the hemispherical cup (The same steps were then repeated by
using the hemispherical cup instead of the flat plate).
5
5 Calculation and Result
……………………………….…………………………(5.2)
Q = volume / time,
(5.3)
……………………………………………………………………………… (5.4)
………………….………………………………………..… (5.5)
…………………………………………………………….….. (5.6)
6
Where:
= = the velocity at the nozzle,
7
FLAT PLATE
2.50
2.00
F th (N)
1.50
1.00
0.50
0.00
0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50
F act (N)
For example:
𝑣𝑜𝑙. 5 𝑙𝑡 0.194𝑙𝑡/𝑠
𝑄𝑎𝑐𝑡 = = = = 0.000194 𝑚3/𝑠
𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑒 25.8 𝑠 1000
𝑄𝑎𝑐𝑡 0.000194 𝑚3 /𝑠
𝑉 𝑛𝑜𝑧𝑙𝑙𝑒 = = 𝜋 = 2.47 𝑚/𝑠
𝐴 (0.01𝑚) 2
4
𝑉 𝑖𝑛 = √𝑉 𝑛𝑜𝑧𝑙𝑙𝑒 2 − 2𝑔𝑆 = √2.472 − (2)(9.81)(0.035) = 2.33 𝑚/𝑠
𝐹𝑎𝑐𝑡 = 4𝑔𝑦 = 4(9.81)(0.01) = 0.39 𝑁
𝐹𝑡ℎ = 𝜌 𝑄 𝑉𝑖𝑛 = (1000)(0.000194)(2.33) = 0.45 𝑁
8
HEMISPHERICAL PLATE
2.50
2.00
F th (N)
1.50
1.00
0.50
0.00
0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50
F act (N)
For example:
𝑣𝑜𝑙. 5 𝑙𝑡 0.195𝑙𝑡/𝑠
𝑄𝑎𝑐𝑡 = = = = 0.000195 𝑚3/𝑠
𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑒 25.6 𝑠 1000
𝑄𝑎𝑐𝑡 0.000195 𝑚3 /𝑠
𝑉 𝑛𝑜𝑧𝑙𝑙𝑒 = = 𝜋 = 2.49 𝑚/𝑠
𝐴 (0.01𝑚)2
4
𝑉 𝑖𝑛 = √𝑉 𝑛𝑜𝑧𝑙𝑙𝑒 2 − 2𝑔𝑆 = √2.492 − (2)(9.81)(0.035) = 2.35 𝑚/𝑠
𝐹𝑎𝑐𝑡 = 4𝑔𝑦 = 4(9.81)(0.02) = 0.78 𝑁
𝐹𝑡ℎ = 2𝜌 𝑄 𝑉𝑖𝑛 = 2(1000)(0.000195)(2.35) = 0.92𝑁
9
6 Discussion
For this experiment, we used two type of deflector which is 90°and 180°.
For each type test from test 1 to 5, the applied weight was increased
because to balance the water out from the nozzle strike a target Based on
time recorded and information above, we are able to to calculate velocity
and force for each test for different type of deflector. Other than that, when
the measured increased, the time needed to level up the water in volumetric
is decrease. This result also decrease the flow rate of water. When
comparing two type of deflectors, the flow rate for the deflector type 180
degree is found to be lowest. It occurs because the more angle deflector is
more smooth to water fill up the tank than deflector with flat surface. Hence,
flow rate will become low.
For the slope we can see that have a little bit different between experimental
and theoretical slope. This thing happen due to several errors and
assumptions when conductiong experiment. Firstly, the effect of gravity on
the water jet is neglected. In fact, the velocity of water jet will decrease as
it leaves the nozzle and before it collides with the target surface. The
decrease in velocity due to the acceleration due to gravity will cause more
mass is needed to produce effect of same flow rate. The other assumption
made is the contact of water molecules and target surface are assumed to
be frictionless. In fact, movement of water along the targeted surface is not
totally frictionless, energy is loss in the form of heat. Moreover, the
assumption of elastic collision between water molecules and wall also cause
the error of experiment. The collision between water molecule and target
surface is not completely elastic and therefore some of the energy transform
into heat energy due to friction.
Another of the errors may be the error made during setting the pointer, the
pointer may not precisely set to zero due to parallex error. Lastly, the error
is was made when recording the time because of the limitation of human
eyes.
To summarise, a higher degree deflector a steeper gradient, for example,
with a 180° deflector, its max velocity is the lowest among the three
deflectors. Next, if a lower degree deflector is used, it will obtain a higher
flow rate when the heaviest weight is applied.
10
7 References
1. https:///topics/engineering/level-gauge
2. https:///fluid-kinematics/
11