Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Aqa 74471 MS Jun22
Aqa 74471 MS Jun22
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
7447/1
Paper 1
Mark scheme
June 2022
Version: 1.0 Final Mark Scheme
*226a7447/1/MS*
MARK SCHEME – A-LEVEL ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE – 7447/1 – JUNE 2022
Mark schemes are prepared by the Lead Assessment Writer and considered, together with the relevant
questions, by a panel of subject teachers. This mark scheme includes any amendments made at the
standardisation events which all associates participate in and is the scheme which was used by them in
this examination. The standardisation process ensures that the mark scheme covers the students’
responses to questions and that every associate understands and applies it in the same correct way.
As preparation for standardisation each associate analyses a number of students’ scripts. Alternative
answers not already covered by the mark scheme are discussed and legislated for. If, after the
standardisation process, associates encounter unusual answers which have not been raised they are
required to refer these to the Lead Examiner.
It must be stressed that a mark scheme is a working document, in many cases further developed and
expanded on the basis of students’ reactions to a particular paper. Assumptions about future mark
schemes on the basis of one year’s document should be avoided; whilst the guiding principles of
assessment remain constant, details will change, depending on the content of a particular examination
paper.
Copyright information
AQA retains the copyright on all its publications. However, registered schools/colleges for AQA are permitted to copy material from this booklet for their own
internal use, with the following important exception: AQA cannot give permission to schools/colleges to photocopy any material that is acknowledged to a third
party even for internal use within the centre.
2
MARK SCHEME – A-LEVEL ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE – 7447/1 – JUNE 2022
Before you apply the mark scheme to a student’s answer read through the answer and annotate it (as
instructed) to show the qualities that are being looked for. You can then apply the mark scheme.
When assigning a level you should look at the overall quality of the answer and not look to pick holes in
small and specific parts of the answer where the student has not performed quite as well as the rest. If
the answer covers different aspects of different levels of the mark scheme you should use a best fit
approach for defining the level and then use the variability of the response to help decide the mark within
the level, ie if the response is predominantly level 3 with a small amount of level 4 material it would be
placed in level 3 but be awarded a mark near the top of the level because of the level 4 content.
You may well need to read back through the answer as you apply the mark scheme to clarify points and
assure yourself that the level and the mark are appropriate.
Indicative content in the mark scheme is provided as a guide for examiners. It is not intended to be
exhaustive and you must credit other valid points. Students do not have to cover all of the points
mentioned in the Indicative content to reach the highest level of the mark scheme.
An answer which contains nothing of relevance to the question must be awarded no marks.
3
MARK SCHEME – A-LEVEL ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE – 7447/1 – JUNE 2022
Total
Qu Part Marking guidance Comments AO
marks
Pollutant
Control
technology Heavy Radioactive
Asbestos Oil Pesticides
metals waste
Adsorption by 1
✓ (✓) (✓)
polymers
Leachate
✓ 1
collection
Satellite
✓ 1
monitoring
Total = 5
4
MARK SCHEME – A-LEVEL ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE – 7447/1 – JUNE 2022
Total
Qu Part Marking guidance Comments AO
marks
Total
Qu Part Marking guidance Comments AO
marks
Total
Qu Part Marking guidance Comments AO
marks
Total
Qu Part Marking guidance Comments AO
marks
02 4 • polonium-210 1 AO3 1c
• (alpha) particles greater ionising power/create more free radicals 1
(per unit distance)/particles absorbed in a smaller mass of AO2
tissue/highest RBE
5
MARK SCHEME – A-LEVEL ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE – 7447/1 – JUNE 2022
Total
Qu Part Marking guidance Comments AO
marks
• Encapsulation
• in stainless steel container/concrete
Total = 10
Total
Qu Part Marking guidance Comments AO
marks
03 1 • One mark for: Award two marks for correct final 1 AO3 1a
answer without working
700 × 100
147
Award one mark for final answer
that is mathematically correct but
OR incorrect format and/or more than
one sig fig, eg 480 × 109 (tonnes)
700 ÷ 1.47 or 480 000 000 000 (tonnes)
• One mark for:
5 × 1011 (tonnes) A: 4.8 x 1011 1
Total
Qu Part Marking guidance Comments AO
marks
Biosphere: 1
• less carbon in living organisms because of deforestation
• less carbon in dead organic matter because of increased
decomposition/peat removal/crop harvesting/soil erosion
A: more carbon in livestock/crops because of commercial farming
Hydrosphere: 1
• more carbon as dissolved/stored carbon dioxide/(hydrogen)
carbonate ions/carbonic acid because of increased dissolving from
increased carbon dioxide in atmosphere
6
MARK SCHEME – A-LEVEL ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE – 7447/1 – JUNE 2022
Lithosphere: 1
• less carbon as carbonates in rocks because of mining/use in
industry/construction
• less carbon in fossil fuels because of combustion
A: fracking
Total
Qu Part Marking guidance Comments AO
marks
03 3 Similarity AO2
• both reduce/store atmospheric carbon (dioxide) 1
R: removes atmospheric carbon (dioxide)
Two from:
Differences 2
• carbon sequestration removes carbon (dioxide) from the
atmosphere, CCS stops carbon (dioxide) being released into
atmosphere/stops carbon release at source
• carbon sequestration involves tree planting/storage in biosphere
CCS involves underground storage of carbon (dioxide) removed
from fuel/waste gases/storage in lithosphere
• carbon sequestration stores short term, CCS stores long term
• carbon sequestration is a natural process eg photosynthesis, CCS
has been developed by humans
7
MARK SCHEME – A-LEVEL ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE – 7447/1 – JUNE 2022
Total
Qu Part Marking guidance Comments AO
marks
Total = 10
8
MARK SCHEME – A-LEVEL ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE – 7447/1 – JUNE 2022
Total
Qu Part Marking guidance Comments AO
marks
04 1 • energy per unit mass is less variable (per biofuel) than energy per 1 AO3 1c
unit volume
One from: 1
• credit correct use of data in table, eg biodiesel one value for energy
per mass but range of value for energy per unit volume
• (often) easier to measure mass than volume
Total
Qu Part Marking guidance Comments AO
marks
Total
Qu Part Marking guidance Comments AO
marks
9
MARK SCHEME – A-LEVEL ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE – 7447/1 – JUNE 2022
Total
Qu Part Marking guidance Comments AO
marks
Advantages:
• can control supply rate OR greater reliability as
not intermittent/unpredictable (like solar/wind)
• can be stored (until needed)
• versatility: can be used as solids/liquids/gases
• uses (organic) waste/low embodied energy
• limited infrastructure changes needed eg wood
pellets in power stations
• higher energy densities then solar and wind
• carbon neutral
Disadvantages:
• supply of biofuels from wastes limited by amount
of waste produced
• biofuel crop production requires large areas of
farmland/may compete with food production/may
lead to deforestation/destruction of natural
habitats
• biofuel crops may require particular
environments/climates
fertile soil
• biofuel production may have environmental
impacts through, eg habitat loss/fertiliser
use/pesticide use/impact of fossil fuel use for
machinery/carbon dioxide production.
Total = 10
10
MARK SCHEME – A-LEVEL ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE – 7447/1 – JUNE 2022
Total
Qu Part Marking guidance Comments AO
marks
11
MARK SCHEME – A-LEVEL ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE – 7447/1 – JUNE 2022
Total
Qu Part Marking guidance Comments AO
marks
05 2
• reduction in heat loss per mm increase in thickness is greatest up to 1 AO3 1a
100 mm/beyond 100 mm reduction in heat lost is decreased
• further energy savings in (rate of) heat loss not matched by energy
used in producing/installing extra fibreglass
Total
Qu Part Marking guidance Comments AO
marks
05 3 • 75 mm 2 AO3 1c
A: 50-100
• at 75mm fuel cost £10.5 and insulation costs £9 (at 50mm the fuel
cost is £14 and insulation cost is £6, at 80mm the fuel cost is £10
and insulation is £10, and at 100mm the fuel cost is £8 and
insulation is £12)
• (beyond 80 mm) (positive gradient of the) insulation cost > (negative
gradient of the) fuel cost
Total
Qu Part Marking guidance Comments AO
marks
Up to three from: 3
Total = 10
12
MARK SCHEME – A-LEVEL ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE – 7447/1 – JUNE 2022
Total
Qu Part Marking guidance Comments AO
marks
06 1 • B: (W2) 1 AO1 1b
Total
Qu Part Marking guidance Comments AO
marks
Total
Qu Part Marking guidance Comments AO
marks
Total = 5
13
MARK SCHEME – A-LEVEL ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE – 7447/1 – JUNE 2022
Total
Qu Part Marking guidance Comments AO
marks
Total
Qu Part Marking guidance Comments AO
marks
14
MARK SCHEME – A-LEVEL ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE – 7447/1 – JUNE 2022
Total
Qu Part Marking guidance Comments AO
marks
15
MARK SCHEME – A-LEVEL ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE – 7447/1 – JUNE 2022
Total
Qu Part Marking guidance Comments AO
marks
• high UV levels
• formation of photochemical smog (E)
Total = 10
Total
Qu Part Marking guidance Comments AO
marks
Total
Qu Part Marking guidance Comments AO
marks
16
MARK SCHEME – A-LEVEL ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE – 7447/1 – JUNE 2022
Total
Qu Part Marking guidance Comments AO
marks
Intensity:
• (overall) more intense/peaks are becoming higher
• quantitative evidence from graph, eg highest peaks in each decade:
1.5 oC in 1950s, 1.4 oC in 1960s, 1.8 oC in 1970s, 2.3 oC in 1980s,
2.4 oC in 1990s, 1.5 oC in 2000s, 2.5 oC in 2010s
• data spans 67 / >60 years so this is a reliable trend (do not award
this point twice – see below)
Frequency:
• (overall) peaks remain at approximately the same frequency
• quantitative evidence from graph, e.g. peaks above threshold: 3 in
1950s, 3 in 1960s, 3 in 1970s, 3 in 1980s, 4 in 1990s, 3 in 2000s
• data spans 67 / >60 years so this is a reliable pattern (do not award
this point twice – see above)
Allow one mark for idea that peaks lasting longer means they are
becoming more frequent
Total
Qu Part Marking guidance Comments AO
marks
17
MARK SCHEME – A-LEVEL ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE – 7447/1 – JUNE 2022
Total
Qu Part Marking guidance Comments AO
marks
08 5 AO1 1b
environmental tipping points may contribute to/cause
(irreversible/unstoppable)
1
• concern eg GCC, sea level rise, loss of biodiversity, extreme
weather events, changes in ocean currents
OR
AND
Total = 10
18
MARK SCHEME – A-LEVEL ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE – 7447/1 – JUNE 2022
Total
Qu Part Marking guidance Comments AO
marks
Total
Qu Part Marking guidance Comments AO
marks
09 2 Steps common to both methods but only award each once: 4 AO1 1a
• soil sample (placed in pre-weighed evaporating basin and) weighed
• repeated heating and weighing until constant mass is reached
determining dry soil mass:
• basin (with sample) heated at 100 oC (allow specified temperatures
in range 80 to 100 oC)
determining burnt soil mass:
• basin (with sample) heated in a furnace/with a Bunsen burner/ >100
to 500 oC (allow specified temperature(s) within this range)
Total
Qu Part Marking guidance Comments AO
marks
09 3 • (39.6 – 33.2) × 100 Award two marks for correct final 1 AO2
39.6 answer without working
• 16.2 (%) 1
Error carried forward – 1 mark
19
MARK SCHEME – A-LEVEL ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE – 7447/1 – JUNE 2022
Total
Qu Part Marking guidance Comments AO
marks
Total = 10
20
MARK SCHEME – A-LEVEL ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE – 7447/1 – JUNE 2022
Total
Qu Part Marking guidance Comments AO
marks
10 1 AO1 1a
Pre-treatment:
• (metal) screens/grills/sieves 2
• trap floating/suspended items/large items
OR
• grit traps
• collect stones and grit
OR
• comminutors
• chop up suspended faecal solids
Secondary treatment:
• aeration tanks/oxidation ponds 2
• (aerobic) bacteria break down/decompose (remaining) organic
material
OR
OR
Tertiary treatment:
• phosphate stripping by chemical treatment/iron(III) sulfate/reed bed 2
filtration
• removal of phosphates
OR
21
MARK SCHEME – A-LEVEL ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE – 7447/1 – JUNE 2022
Total
Qu Part Marking guidance Comments AO
marks
• methaemoglobinaemia/blue
baby syndrome
• possible human carcinogen
22
MARK SCHEME – A-LEVEL ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE – 7447/1 – JUNE 2022
Total = 15
23
MARK SCHEME – A-LEVEL ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE – 7447/1 – JUNE 2022
Examiners are reminded that AO1, AO2 and AO3 are regarded as interdependent. When deciding on a
mark all should be considered together using the best fit approach. In doing so, examiners should bear
in mind the relative weightings of the assessment objectives. More weight should therefore be given to
AO1 than AO2 and AO3.
A response to the question which is focused in parts but lacking appropriate depth.
A conclusion may be present, supported by some judgements, but it is likely not all
will be relevant.
A conclusion may be stated, but it is not supported by any judgments and is likely to
be irrelevant.
1 1–3
A limited range of knowledge and understanding of natural processes/systems is
shown. There is an attempt to apply this to the question, but there are fundamental
errors and/or omissions. The answer may attempt to identify relationship between
environmental issues, but is rarely successful.
24
MARK SCHEME – A-LEVEL ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE – 7447/1 – JUNE 2022
Total
Qu Part Marking guidance Comments AO
marks
AO1 = 10
11 1 25 AO2 = 10
AO3 = 5
Topic area Water resources
Management methods Impact on environment
/ spec ref exploited
25
MARK SCHEME – A-LEVEL ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE – 7447/1 – JUNE 2022
• Use of upstream
reservoirs to regulate
flow
26
MARK SCHEME – A-LEVEL ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE – 7447/1 – JUNE 2022
• environmentally
• Tidal power
Lagoons sensitive areas
avoided
• avoid changes to tidal
range
• avoid sediment and
Instream turbines
pollution build up
• anchoring of floating
• Wave power systems can create
new habitats
Total = 25
27
MARK SCHEME – A-LEVEL ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE – 7447/1 – JUNE 2022
Total
Qu Part Marking guidance Comments AO
marks
AO1 = 10
11 2 25 AO2 = 10
AO3 = 5
Mineral resources
Topic area
exploited / area of Management methods Impact on environment
/ spec ref
demand
28
MARK SCHEME – A-LEVEL ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE – 7447/1 – JUNE 2022
3.3.4
Construction Mines-operational • reduction in airborne
Strategies to particulates, confined to site
materials, management
secure future
eg aggregates- sand • minimise dust production
energy
and gravel- using water sprays on site • reduced disturbance on
supplies humans/wildlife
road building and on vehicles leaving
• minimise noise by use of
3.3.4.2
baffle mounds, control time • reduction in suspended
New energy particulates entering rivers
of blasting
conservation
• control of turbid drainage • maintains light levels
technologies • reduces blanketing effects
water using sedimentation
lagoons on aquatic plants
• increases aesthetics
Mines – post operational
management • increases biodiversity
• habitat restoration
• potential amenity use
• potential agricultural use
• reduces likelihood of a
• monitor potential residual pollution event
problems, eg toxic wastes
Methods used to exploit low
grade deposits, eg • low energy intensive than
• bioleaching, phytomining, smelting, less ff used, less
iron displacement, leachate GHG emissions
collection, bacterial • used to de-contaminate sites
adsorption, polymer • spoil heap waste used as
adsorption source, less mining impacts
and pollution
29
MARK SCHEME – A-LEVEL ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE – 7447/1 – JUNE 2022
Mineral resources
Oil
for energy
• Reduces need for more
• secondary and tertiary
primary extraction
recovery
• Can avoid ecologically
• directional drilling
sensitive areas
• Reduces pollution from
• ROVs and AUVs
leaking pipelines
Coal
• Reduces need for more
• Gasification open cast mining
Nuclear
• Reduces impacts of uranium
• polymer adsorption of mining
uranium from sea water
• phosphate mining
• extraction from coal ash
Renewables
• Reduces impacts of mining
for non-renewables
Total = 25
30
MARK SCHEME – A-LEVEL ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE – 7447/1 – JUNE 2022
A response in which the focus is largely sustained, with content that is mainly
accurate and detailed. Relationships are identified and the answer is largely
coherent.
Where conclusions are made, these are supported by judgements which are mostly
coherent and relevant.
A partial response which is focused in parts. The content is mostly accurate but not
always detailed. There is an attempt at identifying relationships, but the answer as a
whole is not fully coherent.
Where conclusions are made, it is not always clear how they relate to the judgments
given and are likely to contain errors.
Relevant environmental terminology is used, but not consistently and there may be
errors.
31
MARK SCHEME – A-LEVEL ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE – 7447/1 – JUNE 2022
Fragmented points, whose relevance to the question and relationships to each other
are unclear.
A few natural processes/systems and environmental issues are listed, but unlikely to
be described and many may be irrelevant. There is no clear attempt to apply them to
1 1–5
the context.
32