Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 7

Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci.

ISSN 0077-8923

A N N A L S O F T H E N E W Y O R K A C A D E M Y O F SC I E N C E S
Issue: Dizziness and Balance Disorders

Vestibular migraine
Joseph M. Furman1 and Carey D. Balaban2
1
Departments of Otolaryngology, Neurology, Bioengineering, and Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania. 2 Departments of Otolaryngology, Neurobiology, Communication Sciences & Disorders, and Bioengineering,
University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Address for correspondence: Joseph M. Furman, M.D., Ph.D., Departments of Otolaryngology, Neurology, Bioengineering,
and Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Suite 500, 203 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213. furmanjm@upmc.edu

Vestibular migraine is now considered a distinct diagnostic entity by both the Barany Society and the International
Headache Society. The recognition of vestibular migraine as a diagnostic entity required decades and was presaged
by several reports indicating that a large proportion of patients with migraine headaches have vestibular symptoms
and that a large proportion of patients with undiagnosed episodic vestibular symptoms have migraine headache.
Despite the availability of diagnostic criteria for vestibular migraine, challenges to diagnosis include variability in
terms of the character of dizziness, the presence or absence of clearly defined attacks, the duration of attacks, and the
temporal association between headache or other migrainous features and vestibular symptoms. Also, symptoms of
vestibular migraine often overlap with symptoms of other causes of dizziness, especially Ménière’s disease and benign
paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV). This article will discuss the demographics, epidemiology, clinical manifes-
tations, physical examination findings, laboratory testing, comorbidities, treatment options, and pathophysiology
of vestibular migraine. Future research in the field of vestibular migraine should include both clinical and basic
science efforts to better understand the pathophysiology of this condition. Controlled treatment trials for vestibular
migraine are desperately needed.

Keywords: vestibular; migraine; headache; dizziness; vertigo; imbalance

entity.5 Of note, this single-page editorial with 21


Vestibular migraine
citations was authored by 10 neurologists repre-
Vestibular migraine is now considered a distinct di- senting four countries in Europe and the United
agnostic entity by both the Barany Society and the States. Despite some diagnostic uncertainty and un-
International Headache Society.1 The current view resolved issues regarding pathophysiology and treat-
of vestibular migraine has evolved during the past ment, vestibular migraine is generally considered
approximately 50 years. Before the formulation of a bona fide neurotologic disorder. Epidemiologic
diagnostic criteria for vestibular migraine, there was data indicate that vestibular migraine is probably the
a realization that recurrent vertigo in some patients most common neurotologic condition presenting to
with migraine could be attributed to migraine it- tertiary clinics that care for patients with dizziness
self rather than to another neurotologic condition.2 and disequilibrium.6
Despite decades of observations and articles regard- The recognition of vestibular migraine as a diag-
ing the link between vestibular symptoms and mi- nostic entity was presaged by several reports that in-
graine headache and the availability of proposed dicated a large proportion of patients with migraine
and validated diagnostic criteria by Neuhauser headaches have vestibular symptoms7–9 and a large
et al.,3 as recently as 2010, Phillips et al. published proportion of patients with undiagnosed episodic
an article in the journal Headache4 that advocated vestibular symptoms have migraine headache.10,11
the dismissal of vestibular migraine as a diagnostic Two well-recognized migraine conditions (i.e., be-
entity. Shortly thereafter, in early 2011, a brief edito- nign recurrent vertigo of childhood12 and basilar-
rial in Headache outlined the arguments in support type migraine13 ) included vestibular symptoms. For
of recognizing vestibular migraine as a diagnostic basilar-type migraine, reports of 61%14 and 63%15
doi: 10.1111/nyas.12645
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. xxxx (2015) 1–7 
C 2015 New York Academy of Sciences. 1
Vestibular migraine Furman & Balaban

Table 1. Diagnostic criteria for vestibular migraine1

A. At least five episodes with vestibular symptoms of moderate or severe intensity, each lasting 5 min to 72 h
B. Current or previous history of migraine with or without aura according to the International Classification of
Headache Disorders (ICHD)
C. One or more migraine features with at least 50% of the vestibular episodes:
• headache with at least two of the following characteristics: one-sided location, pulsating quality, moderate
or severe pain intensity, or aggravation by routine physical activity
• photophobia and phonophobia
• visual aura
D. Not better accounted for by another vestibular or ICHD diagnosis

of patients having vertigo strongly suggested an Symptoms of vestibular migraine often overlap with
association between vestibular disorders and mi- symptoms from other causes of dizziness, espe-
graine. However, few patients who meet criteria for cially Ménière’s disease and benign paroxysmal po-
vestibular migraine also meet criteria for basilar- sitional vertigo (BPPV). In fact, some patients with
type migraine, thereby necessitating a separate di- vestibular migraine have symptoms indistinguish-
agnostic category for vestibular migraine.16 Previ- able from those of Ménière’s disease, which leads
ous to the 2012 acceptance of vestibular migraine to diagnostic uncertainty. Vestibular migraine is es-
as the term assigned to this diagnostic entity, var- sentially a diagnosis of exclusion in that there are
ious different terms were used including “benign no pathognomonic findings on physical examina-
recurrent vertigo”2 to denote a condition akin to tion or laboratory assessment. The diagnostic cri-
vestibular migraine, highlighting the episodic na- teria for vestibular migraine, shown in Table 1, are
ture of the condition. The earliest use of the term essentially based only on history, although meeting
“vestibular migraine” was in 1917 by Boenheim.17 criterion D—the absence of another diagnosis—is
More recently, Dieterich and Brandt, in 1999,18 rein- generally based on the absence of physical examina-
troduced the term “vestibular migraine,” which has tion or laboratory abnormalities that would suggest
now been selected by the international community. an alternative diagnosis.
Importantly, although the term “migrainous ver- As vestibular migraine has only recently been
tigo” was used by Neuhauser et al. in their landmark firmly established as a diagnostic entity, and before
paper of 2001 that established diagnostic criteria 2012 a variety of terms were used to describe what
for this condition,19 their work, and that of others is probably the same condition, the material in this
who used various different terms, can all be consid- review regarding vestibular migraine will be drawn
ered studies of the condition we now designate as from articles that may or may not have used the
vestibular migraine. term “vestibular migraine;” some cited articles used
Despite the availability of diagnostic criteria for alternate terms that were previously in favor at var-
vestibular migraine, uncertainty remains regarding ious institutions to describe what is now considered
neurologic localization, underlying pathophysiol- vestibular migraine.
ogy, functional balance implications, and manage- Regarding demographics and epidemiology, the
ment. In addition, although diagnostic criteria for female-to-male predominance of vestibular mi-
vestibular migraine have been formulated, vestibu- graine is about 5:1, with a mean age of onset of
lar migraine can have various clinical presentations, 37.7 years for women and 42.4 years for men.19
both between patients and for individual patients Migraine headache typically predates the onset of
over time. Variability exists in terms of the character vestibular migraine.18 Neuhauser et al.6 have re-
of dizziness, for example, the presence or absence ported a lifetime prevalence of vestibular migraine
of vertigo or imbalance, the presence or absence in the German population of approximately 1%.
of clearly defined attacks, the duration of attacks, Thus, relative to other neurotologic disorders, such
and the temporal association between headache or as Ménière’s disease, whose incidence is between 7.5
other migrainous features and vestibular symptoms. and 160 per 100,000 persons;20 vestibular neuritis,

2 Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. xxxx (2015) 1–7 


C 2015 New York Academy of Sciences.
Furman & Balaban Vestibular migraine

Table 2. New diagnostic interview for determination of vestibular migraine

1. Does the patient have a lifetime diagnosis of migraine according to IHS criteria?
NO (STOP) YES (proceed to the next question)
2. Have one or more of the following symptoms been experienced with at least five episodes (not necessarily
related to a headache episode) lasting from 5 min to 72 h?
 Spontaneous vertigo
◦ objects in the room seem to spin or turn around the patient
◦ feeling like spinning or turning when stationary
 Positional vertigo
 Head motion–induced vertigo
 Head motion–induced dizziness with nausea
 Visually induced vertigo
 No (STOP)
3. Has one or more of the following symptoms occurred with at least half of the episodes of dizziness?
 Headache with at least two of the following characteristics: one-sided location, pulsating quality, moderate
or severe pain intensity, or aggravation by routine physical activity
 Markedly increased sensitivity to both normal room lighting and normal sounds (the person should
report a need to turn down or turn off lights or close curtains or blinds and a need to turn down or turn
off radio or television, or a need to retreat to a dark, quiet room)
 Visual aura (e.g., visual scotoma or visual hallucination)
 No (STOP)
4. To what degree do the balance symptoms just discussed affect the patient? That is, if not experiencing any
headaches, how much would he/she still be affected by the balance symptoms?
 Vestibular symptoms usually interfere with daily activities (rate as moderate)
 Vestibular symptoms usually prohibit daily activities (rate as severe)
 Vestibular symptoms do not usually interfere with or prohibit daily activities (STOP)
 If symptoms are either moderate or severe, diagnose patient with vestibular migraine. Proceed to the next
question.
5. Is hearing loss or ringing in the ears temporally related to the balance problem?
 YES: A detailed evaluation may be required to determine whether the patient has a nonmigrainous
comorbid otologic disorder.
Note: “STOP” during the interview means that the patient does not have typical vestibular migraine symptoms and
may require additional evaluations for the etiology of vertigo.

whose incidence is 3.5 per 100,000 persons;21 and Moreover, some patients complain of nearly con-
BPPV, whose incidence ranges between 0.01% and stant dizziness with episodic exacerbations. Vestibu-
0.1% per 100,000,22,23 vestibular migraine is very lar migraine often remits only to return several years
common. later. In women of childbearing age, there is of-
The clinical manifestations of vestibular migraine ten an association with the menstrual cycle. Note
typically include dizziness, vertigo, imbalance, and that the currently accepted diagnostic criteria for
spatial disorientation. Many other symptoms can be vestibular migraine require that half of vestibular
seen, including lightheadedness, a swimming sen- episodes must have associated migrainous features.
sation, heavy headedness, a rising sensation, a tin- Thus, most patients report that some of their at-
gling sensation, a rocking sensation, and excessive tacks of dizziness are not temporally associated with
motion-sickness susceptibility. A diagnostic ques- headache or other migrainous symptoms. Also, the
tionnaire based on the Barany Society criteria1 is temporal relationship between dizziness and mi-
shown in Table 2. The duration of vestibular mi- grainous symptoms, when present, can vary be-
graine attacks is highly variable and can range from tween attacks. Some patients never have headache
seconds to minutes to hours to days (Table 3). during attacks of vertigo.24

Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. xxxx (2015) 1–7 


C 2015 New York Academy of Sciences. 3
Vestibular migraine Furman & Balaban

Table 3. Meta-analysis of duration of episodes of vestibular migraine56

Reference Number of Percentage Percentage lasting Percentage lasting Percentage lasting


patients lasting for for minutes for hours for days
seconds

10 84 7.1 (s) 31 (1–120 min) 13.1 (2–24 h) 48.8 (>24 h)


26 100 13 (s) 38 (min) 43 (h) 25 (>24 h)
57 89 20 (1 s to 5 min) 13 (5–60 min) 26 (1–24 h) 21 (>24 h)
18 90 (rotational 7.8 (s) 25.6 (< 5– 30 (1–24 h) 14.4 (>24 h)
vertigo) 60 min)
19 33 18 (1 s to 5 min) 33 (5–60 min) 21 (1–24 h) 27 (>24 h)
Total 396 12.6 20.2 28 25.8

As noted previously, physical examination and canal or otolithic function. An interesting line of
laboratory testing are often normal between attacks research by Lewis et al.31 suggests abnormal vestibu-
in vestibular migraine. Neugebauer et al.25 reported lar perceptions in vestibular migraine. Patients
subtle saccadic pursuit in nearly two-thirds of with vestibular migraine have an abnormally high
patients with vestibular migraine between attacks. sensitivity to low-frequency dynamic roll tilting,31
Some patients can manifest a persistent positional a stimulus that activates both semicircular canal
nystagmus.26 Others can demonstrate a directional and otolith organs. Thus, patients with vestibular
preponderance on rotational testing.26 Patients with migraine may have peripheral or central vestibular
vestibular migraine have also been found to have dysfunction between episodes18,29 and, based on
an increased vestibular ocular reflex (VOR) time eye-movement recording during acute episodes,
constant.27 During attacks, vestibular migraine pa- appear to have central, peripheral, or mixed dys-
tients can present with nystagmus consistent with a function during attacks.28 Although vestibular lab-
peripheral vestibular abnormality, a central vestibu- oratory testing in patients with vestibular migraine
lar abnormality, or a mixture of both central and does not at this time influence treatment decisions,
peripheral features.28 Although many patients with in the future, treatment decisions may benefit from
vestibular migraine have normal vestibular labora- the results of vestibular laboratory testing.
tory test results, there are numerous studies that re- The genetics of vestibular migraine are heteroge-
port vestibular laboratory abnormalities in patients neous, uncertain, and complicated.32 Several studies
with vestibular migraine.10,18,26 Although there is have sought to evaluate the underlying genetic ab-
no pathognomonic pattern of vestibular laboratory normalities in vestibular migraine. Lee et al.33 found
abnormalities for vestibular migraine, the various linkage with a region on 11q, and that group also
abnormalities that have been reported are of interest found an SNP within the PGR-associated region
regarding the pathophysiology of the condition. with vestibular migraine.34 Lee et al.35 found that
Unilateral reduction of peripheral vestibular func- familial vestibular migraine may be linked to 22q12.
tion occurs in about 25% of patients and vestibulo- Bahmad et al.36 reported linkage to 5q35.
ocular asymmetry has been reported in about A link between Ménière’s disease and vestibular
half of patients.29 Recent literature has described migraine has been studied by numerous investiga-
results from vestibular-evoked myogenic potential tors. Clinically, the diagnosis of both of these dis-
(VEMP) testing in patients with vestibular migraine. orders primarily relies on history. Unfortunately,
Cervical VEMPs, which assess saccular function, there is much overlap with regard to symptoma-
appear to be reduced in patients with vestibular tology for these two conditions, thus creating di-
migraine;30 ocular VEMPs, which presumably assess agnostic uncertainty.37 Occasionally, patients meet
utricular function, appear to be normal overall in criteria for both disorders. More frequently, pa-
patients with vestibular migraine. Thus, peripheral tients with vestibular migraine have features sugges-
vestibular abnormalities may involve semicircular tive, but not diagnostic, of Ménière’s disease, and

4 Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. xxxx (2015) 1–7 


C 2015 New York Academy of Sciences.
Furman & Balaban Vestibular migraine

Figure 1. Theoretical pathways in vestibular migraine. Pathways related to sensorimotor performance, interoceptive, and
cognitive-behavioral domains within migraine circuits are shown diagrammatically. The boxes that represent brain stem sensorimo-
tor structures include parallels in peripheral neurochemical organization between vestibular pathways and migraine mechanisms.55

patients with Ménière’s disease have features sug- agents may include ␤-blockers, valproic acid, top-
gestive, but not diagnostic, of vestibular migraine. iramate, tricyclic antidepressants, and lamotrigine.
This overlap in presentation presents a diagnostic Other preventative medications for consideration
challenge. Neff et al.38 studied 147 patients with include zolmitriptan, magnesium oxide, flunar-
vestibular migraine, Ménière’s disease, or both dis- izine, butterbur root, and lifestyle changes such as
orders. The lattermost group amounted to about limiting the intake of foods thought to exacerbate
25% of their sample. Thirty-eight percent of pa- migraine.43 Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors,
tients with vestibular migraine had ear complaints calcium channel blockers, and acetazolamide
and 49% of patients with Ménière’s had headache. also have been discussed as possible treatments
There is general agreement that vestibular migraine for vestibular migraine.44,45 Vestibular migraine
and Ménière’s disease have some pathophysiological is a well-recognized condition in children and
commonalities. Patients with Ménière’s disease are adolescents and is often managed successfully with
twice as likely to have migraine38 and patients with migraine prophylactic medication.46 For patients
migraine are more likely to have an earlier onset of with interictal symptoms, especially complaints
Ménière’s disease.39 Moreover, family history is of- of imbalance, vestibular rehabilitation therapy
ten positive for both disorders.40 Cha et al.40 suggest should be considered.47 Acute attacks of vestibular
that an inherited syndrome exists that has a variable migraine may respond to antimigrainous treatment
expression of migraine and Ménière’s features. such as triptans.48,49
Another disorder often comorbid with vestibu- The pathophysiology of vestibular migraine is
lar migraine is that of anxiety. The conjunction unknown, though several theories have been sug-
of migraine, vestibular symptoms, and anxiety gested. The concept of brain stem ischemia, which
has been termed migraine–anxiety–related dizziness was popular several decades ago, as evidenced by the
(MARD).41 Recognizing this condition may have terms, “vascular headache”7,50 and “basilar artery
important treatment implications because such pa- migraine,”51 has largely been supplanted by neu-
tients often benefit from treatment for an anxiety rochemical theories that may or may not include
disorder as well as a migrainous disorder in addi- a vascular component.52 Cutrer and Baloh pro-
tion to a balance disorder. posed that cortical spreading depression may ex-
The treatment of vestibular migraine has not plain the shorter attacks of vertigo. They also pro-
been studied systematically. Rather, retrospective posed that migraine may lead to damage of the
and anecdotal reports provide most of the infor- inner ear secondary to release of neuropeptides
mation regarding treatment. In a recent article, such as calcitonin gene–related peptide. Ishiyama
Strupp et al.42 reviewed pharmacotherapy options et al.53 also suggested that vestibular migraine may
for vestibular migraine and noted that preventative cause peripheral vestibular dysfunction. The most

Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. xxxx (2015) 1–7 


C 2015 New York Academy of Sciences. 5
Vestibular migraine Furman & Balaban

current pathophysiologic model of vestibular mi- 11. Aragones, J.M. et al. 1993. Migraine: an alternative in the
graine is summarized in Figure 1. This model is diagnosis of unclassified vertigo. Headache 33: 125–128.
12. Basser, L.S. 1964. Benign paroxysmal vertigo of childhood.
based upon the overlap in CNS pathways responsible
(A variety of vestibular neuronitis). Brain 87: 141–152.
for pain, equilibrium, and a sense of well-being. This 13. Kaniecki, R.G. 2009. Basilar-type migraine. Curr. Pain
combined circuitry includes a cognitive–behavioral Headache Rep. 13: 217–220.
component, a sensorineural component, and an in- 14. Sturzenegger, M.H. & O. Meienberg. 1985. Basilar artery
teroceptive component. Important modulators of migraine: a follow-up study of 82 cases. Headache 25: 408–
415.
these circuits include the locus coeruleus and the
15. Kuritzky, A., D.K. Ziegler & R. Hassanein. 1981. Vertigo,
dorsal raphe nuclei, their influence mediated largely motion sickness and migraine. Headache 21: 227–231.
by norepinephrine and serotonin, respectively. Con- 16. Eggers, S.D. 2007. Migraine-related vertigo: diagnosis and
sistent with this model of vestibular migraine is a treatment. Curr. Pain Headache Rep. 11: 217–226.
recent report by Shin et al.54 that showed increased 17. Boenheim, F. 1917. Uber familiare hemicrania vestibularis.
Neurologisches Zentralblatt 36: 226–229.
metabolism in the vestibular cortex and the thalami
18. Dieterich, M. & T. Brandt. 1999. Episodic vertigo related
during attacks of vestibular migraine. to migraine (90 cases): vestibular migraine? J. Neurol. 246:
Future directions in the field of vestibular mi- 883–892.
graine should include both clinical and basic sci- 19. Neuhauser, H. et al. 2001. The interrelations of migraine,
ence efforts to understand the pathophysiology of vertigo, and migrainous vertigo. Neurology 56: 436–441.
20. Minor, L.B., D.A. Schessel & J.P. Carey. 2004. Meniere’s dis-
this condition. Recent articles that probe the overlap
ease. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 17: 9–16.
between migraine and central pain mechanisms55 21. Sekitani, T. et al. 1993. Vestibular neuronitis: epidemiological
and studies of vestibular psychophysics in vestibu- survey by questionnaire in Japan. Acta Otolaryngol. Suppl.
lar migraine31 represent important lines of inves- 503: 9–12.
tigation. Desperately needed are controlled treat- 22. Froehling, D.A. et al. 1991. Benign positional vertigo: inci-
dence and prognosis in a population-based study in Olmsted
ment trials for vestibular migraine. The availability
County, Minnesota. Mayo Clin. Proc. 66: 596–601.
of accepted diagnostic criteria is likely to facilitate 23. Mizukoshi, K. et al. 1988. Epidemiological studies on benign
research regarding vestibular migraine. paroxysmal positional vertigo in Japan. Acta Otolaryngol.
Suppl. 447: 67–72.
Conflict of interest 24. Cha, Y.H. et al. 2009. Association of benign recurrent vertigo
and migraine in 208 patients. Cephalalgia 29: 550–555.
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
25. Neugebauer, H. et al. 2013. Long-term changes of central
ocular motor signs in patients with vestibular migraine. Eur.
References Neurol. 69: 102–107.
26. Cass, S.P. et al. 1997. Migraine-related vestibulopathy. Ann.
1. Lempert, T. et al. 2012. Vestibular migraine: diagnostic cri- Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 106: 182–189.
teria. J. Vestib. Res. 22: 167–172. 27. Jeong, S.H. et al. 2010. Vestibular dysfunction in migraine:
2. Slater, R. 1979. Benign recurrent vertigo. J. Neurol. Neuro- effects of associated vertigo and motion sickness. J. Neurol.
surg. Psychiatr. 42: 363–367. 257: 905–912.
3. Neuhauser, H. & T. Lempert. 2009. Vestibular migraine. 28. von Brevern, M. et al. 2005. Acute migrainous vertigo: clin-
Neurol. Clin. 27: 379–391. ical and oculographic findings. Brain 128: 365–374.
4. Phillips, J. et al. 2010. Migraine and vertigo: a marriage of 29. Furman, J.M. & D.A. Marcus. 2012. Migraine and motion
convenience? Headache 50: 1362–1365. sensitivity. Continuum 18: 1102–1117.
5. von Brevern, M. et al. 2011. Response to: Migraine and ver- 30. Baier, B., N. Stieber & M. Dieterich. 2009. Vestibular-evoked
tigo: a marriage of convenience? Headache 51: 308–309. myogenic potentials in vestibular migraine. J. Neurol. 256:
6. Neuhauser, H.K. et al. 2006. Migrainous vertigo: prevalence 1447–1454.
and impact on quality of life. Neurology 67: 1028–1033. 31. Lewis, R.F. et al. 2011. Abnormal motion perception in
7. Selby, G. & J.W. Lance. 1960. Observations on 500 cases of vestibular migraine. Laryngoscope 121: 1124–1125.
migraine and allied vascular headache. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. 32. Jen, J.C. & R.W. Baloh. 2009. Familial episodic ataxia: a
Psychiatr. 23: 23–32. model for migrainous vertigo. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1164:
8. Friedman, A.P., T.J. Von Storch & H.H. Merritt. 1954. Mi- 252–256.
graine and tension headaches: a clinical study of two thou- 33. Lee, H. et al. 2008. Phenotypic and genetic analysis of a
sand cases. Neurology 4: 773–788. large family with migraine-associated vertigo. Headache 48:
9. Kayan, A. & J.D. Hood. 1984. Neuro-otological manifesta- 1460–1467.
tions of migraine. Brain 107: 1123–1142. 34. Lee, H. et al. 2007. Association of progesterone recep-
10. Cutrer, F.M. & R.W. Baloh. 1992. Migraine-associated dizzi- tor with migraine-associated vertigo. Neurogenetics 8: 195–
ness. Headache 32: 300–304. 200.

6 Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. xxxx (2015) 1–7 


C 2015 New York Academy of Sciences.
Furman & Balaban Vestibular migraine

35. Lee, H. et al. 2006. A genome-wide linkage scan of familial 45. Bisdorff, A.R. 2011. Management of vestibular migraine.
benign recurrent vertigo: linkage to 22q12 with evidence of Ther. Adv. Neurol. Disord. 4: 183–191.
heterogeneity. Hum. Mol. Genet. 15: 251–258. 46. Weisleder, P. & T.D. Fife. 2001. Dizziness and headache: a
36. Bahmad, F., Jr. et al. 2009. Locus for familial migrainous ver- common association in children and adolescents. J. Child
tigo disease maps to chromosome 5q35. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Neurol. 16: 727–730.
Laryngol. 118: 670–676. 47. Whitney, S.L. et al. 2000. Physical therapy for migraine-
37. Brantberg, K. & R.W. Baloh. 2011. Similarity of vertigo at- related vestibulopathy and vestibular dysfunction with his-
tacks due to Meniere’s disease and benign recurrent vertigo, tory of migraine. Laryngoscope 110: 1528–1534.
both with and without migraine. Acta Otolaryngol. 131: 722– 48. Neuhauser, H. et al. 2003. Zolmitriptan for treatment of
727. migrainous vertigo: a pilot randomized placebo-controlled
38. Neff, B.A. et al. 2012. Auditory and vestibular symptoms trial. Neurology 60: 882–883.
and chronic subjective dizziness in patients with Meniere’s 49. Baloh, R.W. 1997. Neurotology of migraine. Headache 37:
disease, vestibular migraine, and Meniere’s disease with 615–621.
concomitant vestibular migraine. Otol. Neurotol. 33: 1235– 50. Lance, J.W. 2012. Impact commentaries. Observations on
1244. 500 cases of migraine and allied vascular headache. J. Neurol.
39. Cha, Y.H. et al. 2007. The relevance of migraine in patients Neurosurg. Psychiatr. 83: 673–674.
with Meniere’s disease. Acta Otolaryngol. 127: 1241–1245. 51. Bickerstaff, E.R. 1961. Basilar artery migraine. Lancet 227:
40. Cha, Y.H., M.J. Kane & R.W. Baloh. 2008. Familial clustering 15–17.
of migraine, episodic vertigo, and Meniere’s disease. Otol. 52. Goadsby, P.J., R.B. Lipton & M.D. Ferrari. 2002. Migraine:
Neurotol. 29: 93–96. current understanding and treatment. N. Engl. J. Med. 346:
41. Furman, J.M. et al. 2005. Migraine-anxiety related dizziness 257–270.
(MARD): a new disorder? J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatr. 76: 53. Ishiyama, A., K.M. Jacobson & R.W. Baloh. 2000. Migraine
1–8. and benign positional vertigo. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol.
42. Strupp, M. et al. 2011. Pharmacotherapy of vestibular and 109: 377–380.
ocular motor disorders, including nystagmus. J. Neurol. 258: 54. Shin, J.H. et al. 2014. Altered brain metabolism in vestibular
1207–1222. migraine: comparison of interictal and ictal findings. Cepha-
43. Baier, B., E. Winkenwerder & M. Dieterich. 2009. “Vestibu- lalgia 34: 58–67.
lar migraine”: effects of prophylactic therapy with var- 55. Furman, J.M., D.A. Marcus & C.D. Balaban. 2013. Vestibu-
ious drugs. A retrospective study. J. Neurol. 256: 436– lar migraine: clinical aspects and pathophysiology. Lancet
442. Neurol. 12: 706–715.
44. Lempert, T. & M. Von Brevern. 2010. “Migrainous vertigo.” 56. Furman, J.M., D.A. Marcus & C.D. Balaban. 2003. Migrain-
In Handbook of Clinical Neurophysiology, Vol. 9. Vertigo and ous vertigo: development of a pathogenetic model and struc-
Imbalance: Clinical Neurophysiology of the Vestibular System. tured diagnostic interview. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 16: 5–13.
S.D.Z. Eggers & D.S. Zee, Eds.:440–450. Elsevier. Amster- 57. Johnson, G.D. 1998. Medical management of migraine-
dam, The Netherlands. related dizziness and vertigo. Laryngoscope 108: 1–28.

Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. xxxx (2015) 1–7 


C 2015 New York Academy of Sciences. 7

You might also like