Presiding Judge Ready To Go

NOTICE!!!!!!
Kevin C. Brazile, Presiding Judge

Superior Court, Torrance CALIFORNIA
Dear Sir,
Your staff is trying to prosecute me under statutory corporate law and it is a violation of my rights
and I am requesting that you have your staff cease and desist any further attempts to simulate legal
process on me as I am a private citizen.
I have become aware of the fraud that was committed on me by deceit. But I am fully aware of the
fraud now and I do not consent and I do not want anything to do with your corporate law.
Thank you for your assistance.
Please make your staff aware of this attached criminal complaint against them as well,
Thanks so much.
Franz joseph grey

Franz joseph grey November 18, 2020
4342 w 165th street
Lawndale california
310-793-7761
2
INVOICE Non-Negotiable FRANZ JOSEPH GREY©

INVOICE NUMBER #555813926-SBA0TR02517-01 DATE:
November 18, 2020
franz: of the family grey
Care of 4342 w 165th street
lawndale california
BILL TO THE FOLLOWING INDIVIDUALS:
William Barr acting under COLOR OF LAW in his private capacity

Fax (202) 307-6777
C/O; Nation: “WASHINGTON, DC
Department of Justice General-Post Office.
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Street Address
Washington, DC 20530-0001 United States Minor, Outlying
Islands
XAVIER BECERRA; acting under COLOR OF LAW acting

under COLOR OF LAW in his private capacity
● Office of the Attorney General
● 1300 "I" Street FAX 916-323-5341
● Sacramento, CA 95814-2919
● Thomas R. Sokolov acting under COLOR OF LAW in his private capacity
● David Sotelo acting under COLOR OF LAW in his private capacity
● Chestopher L. Taylor acting under COLOR OF LAW in his private capacity
● Eric Charles Taylor acting under COLOR OF LAW in his private capacity
● Sandra Ann Thompson acting under COLOR OF LAW in his private capacity FAX #
562-637-0731 TORRANCE
● Glenda Veasey acting under COLOR OF LAW in his private capacity
● William Glen Willett acting under COLOR OF LAW in his private capacity
● Mark Stephen Arnold acting under COLOR OF LAW in his private capacity
● Laura Conway Ellison acting under COLOR OF LAW in his private capacity
● Brad M. Fox acting under COLOR OF LAW in his private capacity
● Hector Manuel Guzman acting under COLOR OF LAW in his private capacity
● Alan Boyd Honeycutt acting under COLOR OF LAW in his private capacity
● Cary Hiroshi Nishimoto acting under COLOR OF LAW in his private capacity
● Stuart Mark Rice acting under COLOR OF LAW in his private capacity
● Ramona Gail See acting under COLOR OF LAW in his private capacity
● Gia G Bosley acting under COLOR OF LAW in his private capacity

● John Allen Slawson acting under COLOR OF LAW in his private capacity
● Alejandro V
illanueva acting sheriff under COLOR OF LAW acting under COLOR OF LAW in his
3
private capacity
● Mike Feuer, Los Angeles City Attorney acting under COLOR OF LAW in his private capacity
● Fax # 213 978-8216
● Jackie Lacey, Los Angeles District Attorney acting under COLOR OF LAW in his private
capacity Fax # (213) 633-0904
●
● State of California Superior Court, Los

Angeles County - Torrance, CA
Southwest District
Torrance Courthouse FAX # 562-637-0731
825 Maple Ave.
Torrance, CA 90503
TERMS AND CONDITIONS:
FOR:
Charges under Un-rebutted Agreement via Tacit, sent via FAX transmission
Delivery Dated < June 12, 2020 >, Recorded Received < November 18, 2020 > ,
for Breaking our Agreement
DESCRIPTION PER INDIVIDUAL ABOVE NAMED DE-

CHARGE RATE AMOUNT
FENDANTS IN THEIR PRIVATE CAPACITY
1. US$ < $500,000.00> for invalid claim by ‘Statement $500,000.00 1 x $500,000.00

Period < June 12, 2020 >' after failure to provide verification
of alleged liability, as per the agreed Fee Schedule set out
in our lawfully binding agreement dated <November 17,
2020 >, recorded received <November 18, 2020 >.
2. US$ < $500,000.00t > for invalid claim by ‘Statement

Period <June 12, 2020 >' after failure to provide verification
of alleged liability, as per the agreed Fee Schedule set out $500,000.00 1x $500,000.00
in our lawfully binding agreement dated < June 12, 2020 >,
recorded received < November 18, 2020 >.
3. US$1,000.00 per hour for 400 hours of Authorized

Representative’s time required, nunc pro tunc, as per the
agreed Fee Schedule set out in our lawfully binding $1,000 2x $400,000.00
agreement dated < June 12, 2020 >, recorded received <
November 18, 2020 >.
4. US$1,000 for FAX transmission, nunc pro tunc, as per the

agreed Fee Schedule set out in our lawfully binding
agreement dated < June 12, 2020 >, recorded received <
November 18, 2020 >. $1,000 1x $1,000.00
5. US$50,000 per day that each proof of claim on any of my $901,000.00 x

submitted paperwork claims aren’t answered for each 22 offenders
individual claim and answer.
4
CURRENT DAMAGES $19,822,000.00

©
Make all cheques payable to FRANZ JOSEPH GREY
Total due in 7 days. Overdue accounts may incur further charges.

You may only use my legal entity name when sending payment.
©
Late payment Fee of $1,000.00 per day. Thank you for your business.
Authorised Representative, All Rights Reserved
No assured value, No liability. Errors & Omissions Excepted. All Rights Reserved.
WITHOUT PREJUDICE – WITHOUT RECOURSE – NON-ASSUMPSIT
Calls may be recorded
UCC § 1-103. Construction of

Uniform Commercial Code to
Promote its Purposes and Policies:
Applicability of Supplemental
Principles of Law.
(a) The Uniform Commercial Code must be liberally construed and applied to
promote its underlying purposes and policies, which are: (1) to simplify, clarify,
and modernize the law governing commercial transactions; (2) to permit the
continued expansion of commercial practices through custom, usage, and
agreement of the parties; and (3) to make uniform the law among the various
jurisdictions.
(b) Unless displaced by the particular provisions of the U niform Commercial Code,
the principles of law and equity, including the law merchant and the law relative
to capacity to contract, principal and agent, estoppel, fraud, misrepresentation,
duress, coercion, mistake, bankruptcy, and other validating or invalidating cause
supplement its provisions.
UCC § 1-105. Severability.

UCC § 1-105. Severability
If any provision or clause of the Uniform Commercial Code or its

application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the invalidity
5
does not affect other provisions or applications of THIS COMPLAINT AND

INVOICE UNDER the Uniform Commercial Code which can be given
effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the
provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code are severable.
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT
● NO IMMUNITY
●
● “Sovereign immunity does not apply where (as
here) government is a lawbreaker or jurisdiction
is the issue.” Arthur v. Fry, 300 F.Supp. 622 an
officer may be held liable in damages to any
person injured in consequence of a breach of
any of the duties connected with his office. The
liability for nonfeasance, misfeasance, and for
malfeasance in office is in his individual , not
his official capacity 70 Am. Jur. 2nd Sec. 50, VII
Civil Liability “Knowing failure to disclose
material information necessary to prevent
statement from being misleading, or making
representation despite knowledge that it has no
reasonable basis in fact, are actionable as
fraud under law.” Rubinstein v. Collins, 20 F.3d
160, 1990
6
●
● When a Citizen challenges the acts of a federal
or state official as being illegal, that official
cannot just simply avoid liability based upon the
fact that he is a public official. In United States
v. Lee, 106 U.S. 196, 220, 221, 1 S.Ct. 240,
261, the United States claimed title to Arlington,
Lees estate, via a tax sale some years earlier,
held to be void by the Court. In so voiding the
title of the United States, the Court declared:
●
● No man in this country is so high that he is
above the law. No officer of the law may set
that law at defiance with impunity. All the
officers of the government, from the highest to
the lowest, are creatures of the law and are
bound to obey it. It is the only supreme power
in our system of government, and every man
who by accepting office participates in its
functions is only the more strongly bound to
submit to that supremacy, and to observe the
limitations which it imposes upon the exercise
of the authority which it gives. Shall it be said
that the courts cannot give remedy when the
citizen has been deprived of his property by
force, his estate seized and converted to the
use of the government without any lawful
authority, without any process of law, and
7
without any compensation, because the

president has ordered it and his officers are in
possession? If such be the law of this country, it
sanctions a tyranny which has no existence in
the monarchies of Europe, nor in any other
government which has a just claim to
well-regulated liberty and the protection of
personal rights.
●
● See Pierce v. United States (The Floyd
Acceptances), 7 Wall. (74 U.S.) 666, 677 (We
have no officers in this government from the
President down to the most subordinate agent,
who does not hold office under the law, with
prescribed duties and limited authority);
Cunningham v. Macon, 109 U.S. 446, 452, 456,
3 S.Ct. 292, 297 (In these cases he is not sued
as, or because he is, the officer of the
government, but as an individual, and the court
is not ousted of jurisdiction because he asserts
authority as such officer. To make out his
defense he must show that his authority was
sufficient in law to protect him It is no answer
for the defendant to say I am an officer of the
government and acted under its authority
unless he shows the sufficiency of that
authority); and Poindexter v. Greenhow, 114
U.S. 270, 287, 5 S.Ct. 903, 912
8
●
● WHEREAS, officials and even judges have no
immunity (See, Owen vs. City of Independence,
100 S Ct. 1398; Maine vs. Thiboutot, 100 S. Ct.
2502; and Hafer vs. Melo, 502 U.S. 21; officials
and judges are deemed to know the law and
sworn to uphold the law; officials and judges
cannot claim to act in good faith in willful
deprivation of law, they certainly cannot plead
ignorance of the law, even the Citizen cannot
plead ignorance of the law, the courts have
ruled there is no such thing as ignorance of the
law, it is ludicrous for learned officials and
judges to plead ignorance of the law therefore
there is no immunity, judicial or otherwise, in
matters of rights secured by the Constitution for
the United States of America. See: Title 42
U.S.C. Sec. 1983.
●
● When lawsuits are brought against federal
officials, they must be brought against them in
their individual capacity not their official
capacity. When federal officials perpetrate
constitutional torts, they do so ultra vires
(beyond the powers) and lose the shield of
immunity. Williamson v. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, 815 F.2d. 369, ACLU Foundation v.
9
Barr, 952 F.2d. 457, 293 U.S. App. DC 101,

(CA DC 1991).
●
● Personal involvement in deprivation of
constitutional rights is prerequisite to award of
damages, but defendant may be personally
involved in constitutional deprivation by direct
participation, failure to remedy wrongs after
learning about it, creation of a policy or custom
under which unconstitutional practices occur or
gross negligence in managing subordinates
who cause violation. (Gallegos v. Haggerty,
N.D. of New York, 689 F. Supp. 93 (1988).
●
●
● The law requires proof of jurisdiction to appear
on the record of the administrative agency and
all administrative proceedings. Hagans v.
Lavine, 415 U. S. 533
●
●
●
● franz grey at all times continually makes the following
demands for perpetuity:
●
●
● “First – “I do not consent to your color of law proceedings in your corporate
defacto jurisdiction by fraud and duress forced by gunpoint””
● Second – “Your offers are not accepted.”
● “Third – “I do not consent to being surety for this case and these proceedings.””
● :Fourth – “I demand the bond be immediately brought forward, so I can see who
will indemnify me if I am damaged.””
10
● “Fifth - “I demand to see the 1099 A and C regarding my case here before we
can proceed any further because I will be committing the following crimes.
●
●
●
If I don’t report these crimes against the people of california by the above
named defendants then these criminals might try to hold me criminally liable
so this is another protective measure that I am lodging in my complaint so
that I have no more liability for eternity from this corporate defacto
usurpations.
● More terms: The outcome of any decision by the Supreme Court on the
issue of state action is difficult to predict. This is especially true since
self-help repossession is not entirely dependent upon Section 9-503, but may
be predicated upon an express term in a security agreement. Further, the
remedy is one long known to the common law. For these reasons, the lower
courts have divided on the issue of whether the presence of Section 9-503 is so
significant to the contents of a security agreement as to make self-help
repossession pursuant to such an agreement action under color of law. The
conclusion of this part will take a brief look at one lower court case which has
expressly held Section 9-503 unconstitutional: Adams v. Egley. 8 ' The
defendant in Adams contended that since the due process clause of the
Fourteenth Amendment applies only to state action and since the security
agreement"2 was a private contract whose terms were self executing, there
was no significant state involvement such that the prohibition of the
Fourteenth Amendment should be invoked. The defendant also argued that
unlike cases involving prejudgment attachment8 3 or replevin," 4 which
required affirmative action by a state official (i.e. the issuance of a writ, and
in the case of replevin, the seizure of property) the contract dealt with
repossession by a private person, a self-help remedy. The creditor or his
agent is the one who is authorized by the contract to remove the collateral
without the aid of any state official. Further, the defendant argued that the
act of repossession is not solely dependent upon the statutory authority but is
specifically provided for in the security agreement itself. The taking was thus
pursuant to the private contract with no state action involved on which to
base jurisdiction.
●
● I demand to see the 1099 A and C regarding my case here before we can
proceed any further because according to your statutes I would be
committing the following crimes:
● If I don’t report these crimes against the people of california by the above
named defendants then these criminals might try to hold me criminally liable
so this is another protective measure that I am lodging in my complaint so
11
that I have no longer be falsely accused by their color of law from this
corporate defacto color of law for simulating a legal process for eternity.
●18 U.S. Code § 4. Misprision

of felony
● U.S. Code
● Notes
● prev | next
● Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony
cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not
as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other
person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall
be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years,
or both.
● (June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 684; Pub. L. 103–322, title
XXXIII, § 330016(1)(G), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)
●
● Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having
knowledge of the commission of any treason against them,
conceals and does not, as soon as may be, disclose and make
known the same to the President or to some judge of the United
States, or to the governor or to some judge or justice of a
particular State, is guilty of misprision of treason and shall be
fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or
both.
● (June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 807; Pub. L. 103–322, title
XXXIII, § 330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)
●
●26 U.S. Code § 7201.Attempt to

evade or defeat tax
● U.S. Code
● Notes
● prev | next
● Any person who willfully attempts in any manner to evade or
defeat any tax imposed by this title or the payment thereof shall,
in addition to other penalties provided by law, be guilty of a
felony and, upon conviction thereof, shall be fined not more than
$100,000 ($500,000 in the case of a corporation), or imprisoned
not more than 5 years, or both, together with the costs of
prosecution.
● (Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 851; Pub. L. 97–248, title III,
§ 329(a), Sept. 3, 1982, 96 Stat. 618.)
12
●
●
●18 U.S. Code § 242.Deprivation

of rights under color of law
● U.S. Code
● Notes
● prev | next
● Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation,
or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory,
Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any
rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the
Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different
punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person
being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are
prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under
this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if
bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this
section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or
threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall
be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years,
or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation
of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to
kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit
aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined
under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or
both, or may be sentenced to death.
● (June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 696; Pub. L. 90–284, title I, § 103(b),
Apr. 11, 1968, 82 Stat. 75; Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, § 7019, Nov. 18,
1988, 102 Stat. 4396; Pub. L. 103–322, title VI, § 60006(b), title XXXII,
§§ 320103(b), 320201(b), title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994,
108 Stat. 1970, 2109, 2113, 2147; Pub. L. 104–294, title VI,
§§ 604(b)(14)(B), 607(a), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3507, 3511.)
●
●28 U.S. Code § 1442.Federal
officers or agencies sued or
prosecuted
● U.S. Code
● Notes
● prev | next
13
● (a)A civil action or criminal prosecution that is commenced in a State

court and that is against or directed to any of the following may be
removed by them to the district court of the United States for the district
and division embracing the place wherein it is pending:
● (1)The United States or any agency thereof or any officer (or any person
acting under that officer) of the United States or of any agency thereof,
in an official or individual capacity, for or relating to any act under color
of such office or on account of any right, title or authority claimed under
any Act of Congress for the apprehension or punishment of criminals or
the collection of the revenue.
● (2)A property holder whose title is derived from any such officer, where
such action or prosecution affects the validity of any law of the United
States.
● (3)Any officer of the courts of the United States, for or relating to any
act under color of office or in the performance of his duties;
● (4)Any officer of either House of Congress, for or relating to any act in
the discharge of his official duty under an order of such House.
● (b)A personal action commenced in any State court by an alien against
any citizen of a State who is, or at the time the alleged action accrued
was, a civil officer of the United States and is a nonresident of such
State, wherein jurisdiction is obtained by the State court by personal
service of process, may be removed by the defendant to the district
court of the United States for the district and division in which the
defendant was served with process.
● (c)Solely for purposes of determining the propriety of removal under
subsection (a), a law enforcement officer, who is the defendant in a
criminal prosecution, shall be deemed to have been acting under the
color of his office if the officer—
● (1)protected an individual in the presence of the officer from a crime of
violence;
● (2)provided immediate assistance to an individual who suffered, or who
was threatened with, bodily harm; or
● (3)prevented the escape of any individual who the officer reasonably
believed to have committed, or was about to commit, in the presence of
the officer, a crime of violence that resulted in, or was likely to result in,
death or serious bodily injury.
● (d)In this section, the following definitions apply:
● (1)The terms “civil action” and “criminal prosecution” include any
proceeding (whether or not ancillary to another proceeding) to the extent
that in such proceeding a judicial order, including a subpoena for
testimony or documents, is sought or issued. If removal is sought for a
proceeding described in the previous sentence, and there is no other
basis for removal, only that proceeding may be removed to the district
court.
● (2)The term “crime of violence” has the meaning given that term in
section 16 of title 18.
● (3)The term “law enforcement officer” means any employee described in
subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) of section 8401(17) of title 5 and any
14
special agent in the Diplomatic Security Service of the Department of

State.
● (4)The term “serious bodily injury” has the meaning given that term in
section 1365 of title 18.
● (5)The term “State” includes the District of Columbia, United States
territories and insular possessions, and Indian country (as defined in
section 1151 of title 18).
● (6)The term “State court” includes the Superior Court of the District of
Columbia, a court of a United States territory or insular possession, and
a tribal court.
● (June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 938; Pub. L. 104–317, title II,
§ 206(a), Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3850; Pub. L. 112–51, § 2(a), (b),
Nov. 9, 2011, 125 Stat. 545; Pub. L. 112–239, div. A, title X, § 1087,
Jan. 2, 2013, 126 Stat. 1969.)
●
●28 U.S. Code § 1350
Alien’s action for tort
● U.S. Code
● Notes
● prev | next
● The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil
action by an alien for a tort only, committed in violation of the
law of nations or a treaty of the United States.
● (June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 934.)
●
● BY your willful acts of profiting through my bonds and not reporting them on an IRS form 1099 A AND C.
●
● And the other acts herein described in all my past demands for proof of claims as well as the additional claims below:
●
I am a non-resident, non domicile, alien to your form of administerial corporate law.
● Judge Alger Fee stated it very clearly in the case of US v Johnson, 76 Fed.Supp. 538, that your Rights
● are “neither accorded to the passive resistant, nor to the person indifferent thereto.” Furthermore
● Judge Fee stated that your Rights “cannot be claimed by attorney or solicitor” and are only valid
● “when insisted upon by a BELLIGERENT claimant in person.” His final warning was clear that
● “one who is persuaded by honeyed words or moral suasion to testify or produce documents…
● simply loses the protection” of your Rights!
● I have been brought into your court by force and threat and duress and barratry and I do not consent to any jurisdiction of your
color of law courts. So therefore I must stand up and be a belligerent claimant in person.
● This contract is self-executing and represents a binding and enforceable contract without recourse should you fail to answer
each and every claim that has been given to you by franz joseph grey in its entirety. Especially with regards to proof of
claims that you said that you had with regards to franz joseph grey. I do not consent to any of your forced COLOR OF LAW
proceedings.
● I do not consent to any of your statutes being brought against me on the private side.
● Your usurpations and trespasses are only referenced so the defendants can grasp the magnitude of their violations and
transgressions toward franz joseph grey, private citizen, sui juris and I RESERVE ALL MY RIGHTS UNDER THE UNIFORM
COMMERCIAL CODE § 1-308 WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND WITHOUT LIABILITY.
●
● Binding Arbitration: franz joseph grey reserves his right to have any and All claims and disputes arising under or relating to
this Agreement are to be settled by binding arbitration. The arbitration shall be conducted by the arbitration services that franz
joseph grey chooses in an unbiased and fair, neutral jurisdiction and the parties shall be bound by any and all rules of the
arbitrator and any award/decision rendered. Any decision or award as a result of any such arbitration proceeding shall be in
writing and shall provide an explanation for all decisions. Any such arbitration shall be conducted by an arbitrator experienced
15
in constitutional law and inalienable rights of all and shall include a written record of the arbitration hearing. An award of
arbitration may be confirmed in a court of competent jurisdiction.
● I demand that all proceedings and actions be terminated immediately in your court and corporate employees or THIS
CURRENT INVOICE WILL CONTINUE TO incur ADDITIONAL PENALTIES AT OUR CURRENT AGREED UPON AND
UNRE-BUTTED SCHEDULE IN everyone's individual capacities because you have all been officially notified that you have no
jurisdiction over me AND ALL OF YOUR PROCEEDINGS HAVE BEEN NOTHING BUT KIDNAPPING, EXTORTION, FRAUD
AND A PLETHORA OF OTHER CRIMES.
BRIEF HISTORY OF CRIMES

COMMITTED
UNLAWFUL INCARCERATION DUE TO

COERCION AND FRAUD
All Court Cases are civil Tax cases:
All court's must file a 1099 A and C and if they don’t you have the responsibility to report them by
using the form 3949 A for failure to report income.
Rule 17; pub 559;
Liability of the beneficiary. The income tax liability of an estate attaches to the assets of the estate.
If the income is distributed or must be distributed during the current tax year, the income is
reportable by each beneficiary on his or her individual income tax return. If the income doesn't have
to be distributed, and isn't distributed but is retained by the estate, the income tax on the income is
payable by the estate. If the income is distributed later without the payment of the taxes due, the
beneficiary can be liable for tax due and unpaid to the extent of the value of the estate assets
received. Income of the estate is taxed to either the estate or the beneficiary, but not to both.
16
Anyone who doubts this read 31 USC 3713. The claim of the US is higher than any other claim.
Under 26 USC 856 they are required to file the carryover transfer tax which is a 50k violation. Also
title 26 tax evasion has a minimum penalty of 100k up to 500k for corporations They have no
personal jurisdiction and they refuse to prove it, I reserve an abatement of all proceedings against
franz joseph grey for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
All of the above are committing a felonies for simulating a legal process
There are NO Criminal Laws in The United States because Criminal Laws would imply that the
Corporate UNITED STATES Governments are Sovereign and have absolute power over all living,
flesh and blood State Citizens (A US Citizen is a legal Fiction), which of course is not true because
a corporation is a fiction and therefore cannot be Sovereign. Man is Sovereign and is in control of
his own destiny and one day he will finally wake up and realize this to be true!
There is however Criminal Contracts being enforced against us and with our Consent [Obtained
through manipulation / perversion of language, non-disclosure, fraud, coercion, champerty and
barratry] which are surreptitiously called: Criminal Statutes. Our Consent has been obtained by
them visa vie our silence and failure to act or protest, which under law is defined as: Tacit
Procuration. (e.g.) Tacit Procuration. But I have become aware of the fraud and concealment
through diligent research and I forever revoke for eternity any of their fraudulently manufactured
consent by force.
After the Civil War, Congress passed the Reconstruction Act bringing all of the states under the
authority of the federal government. Then the Act of 1871 formed a corporation called THE
UNITED STATES. The new corporation, owned by foreign interests, moved in and shoved the
original Constitution into a dustbin. With the Act of 1871, the organic Constitution was defaced —
in effect vandalized and sabotaged — the title was capitalized and the word “for” was changed to
“of”. The Constitution for the united States became the CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED
STATES.
Then, during FDR’s administration in the 30’s, maritime/Admiralty (statutory) law was introduced
into our courts. The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) “was originally approved by its sponsors
17
and the American Bar Association in 1952, and was revised in 1958 to incorporate a number of
changes that had been recommended by the New York Law Revision Commission and other
agencies. Subsequent amendments that were deemed desirable in light of experience under the Code
were approved by the Permanent Editorial Board in 1962 and 1966.” By the middle 1960’s, every
state had passed the UCC into law. The states had no choice but to adopt newly formed Uniform
Commercial Code as the Law of the Land. Washington D.C. adopted the Uniform Commercial
Code in 1963, just six weeks after President John F. Kennedy was killed.
Few people know that Washington, D.C. is a corporation itself. The so-called ‘federal government’
is the Mother Corporation of a vast network of state and local governments and governmental
‘agencies’ that is actually a CORPORATE franchise system. All of these so-called government
entities are for profit institutions and are listed on Dun and Bradstreet in their corporate all caps
names.
The STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND THE SUPERIOR COURTS ARE OPERATING UNDER
THE FOLLOWING RULES:
27 CFR § 72.11 - Meaning of

terms.
● CFR
● Table of Popular Names
prev next
WHEN ALL CRIMES ARE COMMERCIAL
CFR 27 SECTION 72.11
Consider the following facts:
According to the late Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist, 100% of the people that
are in Federal
or State Penitentiaries are there VOLUNTARILY!!!!! Don’t believe it? We have some
simple
“yes” or “no” questions to prove how one is duped into forfeiting their Rights and
trading them
for statutory privileges.

18
An “attorney at law” is an arm of the state and their FIRST duty is to the court, then
the
government… NOT to you! Furthermore, whenever any “duty” to you interferes with
their first
duty, YOU are the one that is to take “back seat.”
Think you have “attorney/client privilege” where what you say to an “attorney at
law” remains
private? Ever hear of “discovery?” This is where “your attorney” is ordered to turn
over your
information to THE STATE that is attempting to incarcerate you.
1 in 32 Americans is either in prison or on parole or probation.
Over 40% of people admitted into prisons in America are “convicted” under the
“Political Code”
and therefore, by definition, Political Prisoners. Furthermore, since Political Prisoners

end up
with mandatory longer sentences, the cumulative effect is that they end up being
the majority of
the population.
America’s incarceration rate is now 743 per 100k, the

highest in the world.
America locks up more people for “Drug Crimes” than all of
Europe locks up for all crimes
combined.
If you go to “trial” in Federal Court, there is a 96% chance
of being “convicted.” Do you really
believe that only 4% are innocent?
It is the “government’s” position that if you do not know
your Rights, then you don’t have any!
According to 27 CFR 72.11, burglary; counterfeiting;
forgery; kidnapping; larceny; robbery;
illegal sale or possession of weapons; prostitution;
extortion; swindling; and many other things,
like simple addiction to drugs or marihuana use, are
considered and defined as “Commercial
Crimes” where you are converted to an object for
“commercial use” and Due Process of Law becomes a farce!
19
Judge Alger Fee stated it very clearly in the case of US v

Johnson, 76 Fed.Supp. 538, that your Rights
are “neither accorded to the passive resistant, nor to the
person indifferent thereto.” Furthermore
Judge Fee stated that your Rights “cannot be claimed by
attorney or solicitor” and are only valid
“when insisted upon by a BELLIGERENT claimant in
person.” His final warning was clear that
“one who is persuaded by honeyed words or moral suasion
to testify or produce documents…
simply loses the protection” of your Rights!
crimes" as set out in 27 CFR 72.11 below (in part).

27 CRF 72.11 purports to define some crimes as
"commercial crimes":
Sec. 72.11 Meaning of terms.
As used in this part, unless the context otherwise requires,
terms shall have the meanings ascribed
in this section. Words in the plural form shall include the
singular, and vice versa, and words
importing the masculine gender shall include the feminine.
The terms "includes" and "including"
do not exclude things not enumerated which are in the
same general class.
...Commercial crimes. Any of the following types of crimes
(Federal or State): Offenses against the
revenue laws; burglary; counterfeiting; forgery; kidnapping;
larceny; robbery; illegal sale or
possession of deadly weapons; prostitution (including
soliciting, procuring, pandering, white
slaving, keeping house of ill fame, and like offenses);
extortion; swindling and confidence games;
and attempting to commit, conspiring to commit, or
compounding any of the foregoing crimes.
20
Addiction to narcotic drugs and use of marihuana will be

treated as if such were commercial
crime.
we are all presumed (by silent judical notice) to be engaged
in "commerce" and triable
accordingly under "Merchant Law"/"Commercial Law"1.
From A COMPILATION OF THE MESSAGES AND PAPERS OF
THE PRESIDENTS
(Bureau of National Literature, Inc., New York, 1911-1914,
1916, 1917) [Vol. XIX]
Encyclopedic Index, Commerce Court:
Commerce Court.--The Mann-Elkins act of June 18, 1910,
created a new judicial body known
as the Commerce Court to review the decisions of the
Interstate Commerce Commission on
appeal and to expedit rate cases formerly tried in the United
States Circuit Courts.
It had the same jurisdiction as Circuit Courts in (1) all cases
for the enforcement, otherwise than
by adjudication and collection of a forfeiture or penalty or
by infliction of a criminal punishment,
of any order of the Interstate Commerce Commission other
than the payment of money; (2) cases
brought to enjoin, set aside, annul or suspend in whole or
part any order of the Interstate
Commerce Commission; (3) such cases as by section three
of the act entitled "An act to further
regulate commerce with foreign nations and among the
states" approved Feb. 19, 1903, were
authorized to be maintained in a Circuit Court of the United
States; (4) all such mandamus
proceedings as under the provisions of section twenty or
section twenty-three of the act entitled
"An act to regulate commerce" approved Feb. 4, 1887, as
amended, were authorized to be maintained in a Circuit
21
Court of the United States.

The jurisdiction of the Commerce Court over cases of the
foregoing nature was exclusive, but the Act did not affect
the jurisdiction previously possessed by any circuit or
district court of the United States over cases or proceedings
of a kind not lying within the above-numerated classes.
The court was abolished Oct. 22, 1913, its jurisdiction
transferred to the district courts and its judges were
retained as circuit judges.
Commerce Courts> (See Courts.):
Defended, 7755.
Establishment of, recommended. 7442.
2.a. From 15 C.J.S. 1115 (1995), COMMERCE, § 148(1), fn.
59:
.Former statutes; commerce court
(1) Under provisions of the Interstate Commerce Act, as
amended by the act of June 29, 1906,
equitable jurisdiction to entertain, hear, and determine
suits to annul or to enjoin the enforcement
of orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission was
conferred on the then circuit courts of the
United States. U.S.--Southern R. Co. v. Tift, Ga., 27 S.Ct.
709, 206 U.S. 428, 51 L.Ed. 1124, 11
Ann.Cas. 846.
(2) This jurisdiction was subsequently transferred to, and
inhered in, the commerce court, while the act creating that
court was in force.
U.S.-- Interstate Commerce Commn. v. Baltimore, etc. R.
Co. Com.Ct., 32 S.Ct. 742, 225 U.S.
326, 56 L.Ed. 1107
(3) The commerce court was abolished in 1913 and the
powers of the commerce court were
conferred on the specially constituted district court.
U.S.-- Brady v. Interstate Commerce Commisssion,
22
D.C.W.Va., 43 F.2d 847, affirmed Brady v.

U.S., 51 S.Ct. 559, 283 U.S. 804, 75 L.Ed. 1424--Standard
Oil Co. v. U. S. D.C.Ind., 41 F.2d 836,
affirmed Standard Oil Co., Indiana v. U. S., 51 S.Ct. 429, 283
U.S. 235, 75 L.Ed. 999--
Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. v. U.S. D.C.W.Va., 35 F.2d 769,
affirmed 51 S.Ct. 337, 283 U.S. 35,
75 L.Ed. 824.
2.b. From DIGEST UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
REPORTS Five Year Supp. 1918-
1922, p. 353:
INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION,
1. The Interstate Commerce Commission Act of February 4,
1887 (24 Stat. at L. 383, chap. 104,
Comp. Stat. § 8576, 4 Fed. Stat. Anno. 2d ed. p. 448),
confers upon the Commission powers of
investigation in very broad language, and the Supreme
Court has refused by construction to limit
it so far as the business of the carriers is concerned, and
their relation to the public. Smith v.
Interstate Commerce Commission, 245 U. S. 33, 38 Sup. Ct.
Rep. 30 [,] 62: [L.Ed.] 135
2.c. However, from U.S.C.A. POPULAR NAME TABLE (2001),
p. 859:
ICC Termination Act of 1995
Pub.L. 104-88, Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 803 (2 § 451: 5 §§
5314, 5315, 8332 note; 5 App. § 8G;
11 §1162; 15 §§ 18, 21, 26, 1681s, 1691c, 1692l, 5904; 16
§ 1247, 1248, 1261, 1261 note; 18 §§
33, 921, 1992, 6001; 23 §§ 127, 149; 26 §§ 168, 281, 354,
3231, 7701; 28 §§ 1336, 1337, 1445,
2321, 2323, 2341, 2342;...) 3. From BOUVIER'S LAW
DICTIONARY, Baldwin's Students Ed.
(1946), p. 190:
23
COMMERCIAL LAW. A phrase employed to denote those

branches of the law which relate to
the rights of property and relations of persons engaged in
commerce.
This term denotes more than the phrases "maritime law,"
which is sometimes used as synonymous, but which more
strictly relates to shippping and its incidents.
As the subjects with which commercial law, even as
administered in any one country, has to deal
are dispersed throughout the globe, it results that
commercial law is less local and more cosmopolitan in its
character than any other great branch of municipal law; and
the peculiar genius of the common law, in adapting
recognized principles of right to new and ever-varying
combinations of facts, has here found a field where its
excellence had been more clearly shown.
The various systems of commercial law have been well
contrasted by Leone Levi in his collection entitled
"Commercial Law, its Principles and Administration, or the
Mercantile Law of Great Britain compared with the Codes
and Laws of Commerce of all the Important
MercantileCountries of the Modern World, and with the
Institutes of Justinian;" London, 1850-52; a work ofgreat
interest both as a contribution to the project of a mercantile
code and as a manual of present use.
As to the rule in the Federal Courts, see 16 Pet. 1; id. 711;
107 U.S. 33, where Bradley, J. says, "Where the law has not
been settled, it is the right and duty of the Federal Courts to
exercise their own judgment, as they also always do in
reference to the doctrines of commercial law." See 12
Am. L. Reg. (N. S.) 473; United States Courts.
4. From 15A C.J.S. 2 (1995), COMMERCIAL: Commercial law.
A phrase neither scientific nor accurate which is used to
designate the whole body of substantive jurisdiction
applicable to the rights, intercourse, and relations of
persons engaged in commerce, trade, or merchantile
pursuits; that branch of the law which relates to the rights
of property and the relations of persons engaged in
commerce; a law not peculiar to one state, or dependent
upon local authority, but one arising out of the usage of the
24
commercial world, although it has also been stated that

there is no such thing as a general commercial law separate
from the particular state or government whose authority
makes it law. It has also been described as a system of
jurisprudence acknowledged by all maritime nations;and, as
foreign commerce is carried on by means of shipping, the
term has come to be used occasionally as synonymous with
"maritime law;", but, in strictness, the phrase "commercial
law" is wider, and includes many transactions or legal
questions which have nothing to do with shipping or its
incidents.
5. From BOUVIER'S LAW DICTIONARY, Baldwin's Students
Ed. (1946), p. 756:
MARITIME LAW. That system of law which particularly
relates to the affairs and business of the sea, to ships, their
crews and navigation, and to the marine conveyance of
persons and property.
Whilst the general maritime law is the basis for the
maritime law of the United States, as well as of other
countries, it is only so far operative in this, or any country,
as it is adopted by the laws and usages thereof. It has no
inherent force of its own. 21 Wall. 558.
In particular matters, especially such as approach a merely
municipal character, the received maritime law may differ
in different countries without affecting the integrity of the
system as a harmonious whole.
The general system of maritime law which was familiar to
the lawyers and statesmen of this country when the
constitution was adopted, was intended, and referred to,
when it was declared in that instrument that the judicial
power of the United States shall extend "to all cases of
admiralty and maritime jurisdiction."
This adopted, it became the maritime law of the United
States, operating uniformly in the whole country. The
question as to the true limits of maritime law and admiralty
jurisdiction is exclusively a judicial question, and no state
law or act of congress can make it broader or narrower than
the judicial power may determine those limits to be. But
what the law is within those limits, assuming the general
maritime law to be the basis of the system, depends on
what has been received as law in the maritime usages of
25
this country, and on such legislation as may have been

competent to effect it.
...The law of limited liability was enacted by congress a a
part of the maritime law of the United States, and, in its
operation, extends wherever public navigation extends; 130
U.S. 527; the act of congress of 1886, § 4, extending the
limited liability act to vessels used on a river in
inlandnavigation is a constitutional and valid law; 141 U.S.
1. ...6. From 55 C.J.S. 710 (1995), MARITIME:
Maritime.
...
Maritime transaction. A transaction which is to be rendered
or performed on the high seas or Navigable waters, or
directly connected with navigation on navigable waters. The
term "maritime transactions" has been held, under certain
circumstances to be synonymous with "commercial
transactions" see 15 C.J.S. p 576, note 18. Maritime
transactions as subject to admiralty jurisdiction see
Admiralty § 24.
7. From 52A C.J.S. 743 (1995), LAW:
Merchantile law, Commercial law, and Law merchant. These
terms are substantially equivalent,
merchantile law being defined as the system of
jurisprudence acknowledged or recognized by all
commercial nations, this being practically identical with one
of the generally accepted definitions
of "commercial law," see the C.J.S. definition Commercial.
Merchantile law designates the system of rules, customs,
and usages generally recognized and
adopted by merchants and traders, and which, either in its
simplicity or as modified by common
law or statutes, constitutes the law for the regulation of
their transactions and the solution of their
controversies. For definitions and discussion concerning law
merchant see Bills and Notes § 2.
8.a. From 27 Cal Jur 3d (Rev), Part 2, p. 487, DOCUMENTS
26
OF TITLE, § 6 (most footnotes

omitted):
State regulation; law merchant
Those provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code
governing documents of title are subject to
any regulatory statute of this state, tariff classification, or
regulation filed or issued pursuant
thereto to the extent that they are applicable.[UCC § 7103]
As discussed elsewhere, the state is
constitutionally empowered to regulate public and private
carriers and certain incidents of the
carriage of goods incident thereto, as well as those public
warehouses regarded as public utilities.
The principles of law and equity, including the law merchant
and the law relative to capacity to
contract, principal and agent, estoppel, fraud,
misrepresentations, duress, coercion, mistake,
bankruptcy, or other validating or invalidating cause
supplement the provisions of the Uniform
Commercial Code unless displaced by its particular
provisions.
8.b. From Ibid., p. 486, § 5 (most footnotes omitted):
The provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code dealing
with documents of title are subject
to any treaty or statute of the United States.[UCC 7103]
Thus, where a document of title is
involved in the interstate or international shipment of
goods, or where the transaction is
otherwise subject to federal regulation, the rights and
liabilities of the parties must be
governed by applicable federal stateutes as interpreted by
federal tribunals.
8.c. From West's Ann.Cal.Comm. Code (2002), § 7103:
To the extent that any treaty or statute of the United States,
27
regulatory statute of this State, or

tariff, classification or regulation filed or issued pursuant
thereto is applicable, the provisions of
this division are subject thereto.
9.a. From 48 C.J.S. 9 (1995), INTERNATIONAL LAW, § 5
(footnotes omitted):
The body of rules now known as international law has been
of slow growth, and has particularly
developed since the early days of the sixteenth century. The
chief sources of international law are
customs and usages of civilized nations, treaties and other
interstate agreements, the decisions of
international tribunals, and the decisions of national
tribunals.
9.b. From Ibid., § 3 (footnotes omitted):
International law is differentiated from "municipal law,"
which is the other branch of positive law
and which governs the internal affairs of a sovereign state.
9.c. From Id., § 2 (footnotes omitted):
International law applies on all the seas and coasts of the
world, and its settled principles should
not be subverted by the exigencies, perhaps temporary, of a
single nation on a particular coast. ...
As to source, international law has been divided into
customary and conventional, or diplomatic.
As to subject matter, international law is divided into public
international law and private
international law, the latter comprising that body of
jurisdiction now generally referred to by the
name "conflict of laws."
9.d. From Id., § 4 (footnotes omitted):
International law is a part of the law of the United States,
and as such is the law of all states of the
28
Union. Nonetheless, the rules of international law are

subject to express acts of Congress, and the courts are
bound to recognize applicable treaties, statutes, and
constitutional provisions as superior to the canons of
international law. The federal disctict courts are bound to
apply provisions of acts of Congress even if they are found
to be inconsistent with the views of international law....
Thus, international law does not affect a state in its
reasonable regulation of conduct within its territorial limits.
BOUVIER'S LAW DICTIONARY, Baldwin's Students Ed.
(1946), p. 674:
LAW MERCHANT. The general body of commercial usages in
matters relating to commerce.
Blackstone calls it the custom of merchants, and ranks it
under the head of the particular customs
of England, which go to make up the great body of the
common law. 1 Bla. Com. 75. Since,
however, its character is not local, not its obligation
confined to a particular district, it cannot
with propriety be considered as a custom in the technical
sense. 1 Steph. Com. 54. It is a system
of law which does not rest exclusively on the positive
institutions and local customs of any
particular country, but consists of certain principles of
equity and usages of trade which general
convenience and a common sense of justice have
established, to regulate the dealings of
merchants and mariners in all the commercial countries of
the civilized world. 3 Kent 2.
These usages, being general and extensive, partake of the
character of rules and principles of law,
not of matters of fact, as do usages which are local or
special. They constitute a part of the
general law of the land, and being part of that law, their
existence cannot be proved by witnesses,
but the judges are bound to take notice of them ex officio;
29
Winch 24; and this application is not

confined to merchants, but extends to all persons
concerned in any merchantile transaction. ...
11.a. From 15A Am.Jur.2d 367 (1998), COMMERCE, § 36:
What constitutes subjects of commerce.
Although, generally speaking, anything that can be bought
and sold is a subject of commerce,
things which are injurious to the public lose the benefit of
protection as articles of commerce and
are within the police power of the state. ...
11.b. From Id., 368, COMMERCE, § 36:
... while it has been said that, speaking generally, persons
are not subjects of commerce [New
York v. Miln, 36 US 102, 9 L Ed 648], the transportation of
persons for immoral purposes has
been held within the power of Congress to regulate under
the commerce clause.
11.c. In New York v. Miln, the Supreme Court of the United
States held:
But how can this apply to persons? They are not the subject
of commerce; and, not being
imported goods, cannot fall within a train of reasoning
founded upon the construction of a power
given to Congress to regulate commerce, and the
prohibition to the States from imposing a duty
on imported goods.
...
The object of this clause, in all probability, was to enable
the government of the United States to form an accurate
estimate of the increase of the population by emigration;
but, whatsoever may have been its purpose, it is obvious
that these laws only affect, through the power over
navigation, the passengers whilst on their voyage, and until
they shall have landed. After that, and when they have
ceased to have any connection with the ship, and when,
30
therefore, they have ceased to be passengers, we are

satisfied that acts of Congress, applying to them as such,
and only professing to legislate in relation to them as such,
have then performed their office, and can, with no propriety
of language, be said to come into conflict with the law of a
State, whose operation only begins when that of the laws of
Congress ends; whose operation is not even on the
samesubject, because although the person on whom it
operates is the same, yet having ceased to be apassenger
he no longer stands in the only relation in which the laws of
Congress either professed or intended to act upon him.
New York v. Miln (1837), 36 U.S. 102, 9 L.Ed 648, 661-662.
11.d. From 15A Am.Jur.2d, 368-369 (1998), COMMERCE, §
36:
In view of the Supreme Court's refusal to fix an arbitrary
rule as to what constitutes commerce subject to the power
of Congress, it is not surprising that there are some
inconsistencies in the cases dealing with the question as to
what constitutes a subject of commerce. Thus, there is a
possible conflict between earlier cases holding certain
matters not to be subjects of interstate commerce and later
cases holding related matters to be subjects of interstate
commerce, although the earlier cases have not necessarily
been specificallly overruled. For example, while it
wasformerly held that insurance transactions when carried
on across state lines did not constitute interstate
commerce, a later decision held that the business of
insurance when transacted between an insurer and an
insured in different states did constitute interstate
commerce.
statute cannot be applied unless you violate another statute
that specifically states that penalty
statute.
Example #1
Title 18 USC Section 842. This section starts out with "(a) It
shall be unlawful for any person---."
It is so long that you have to read it for yourself as it is four
columns in Title 18. However, I will
quote Title 18 USC 844 which states:
31
"Penalties.
(a) Any person who violates subsections (a) through (i) of
section 842 of
this chapter shall be fined not more than $10,000 or
imprisoned not more
than 10 years, or both.
(b) Any person who violates any other provision of section
842 of this
chapter shall be fined not more than $1,000 or imprisoned
not more than
one year or both."
It continues on for three more columns. Here is the statute
that you must violate, laid out in the
Penalty Statute describing the statute you must violate.
Does any of the other penalty statutes in
Title 26 come even
close to this? Yes, and I will provide it for you.
Example #2
"Chapter 72 Licensing and Registration.
Sec. 7001. (a) All persons undertaking as a matter of
business or for
profit the collection of foreign payments of interest or
dividends by
means of coupons, checks, or bills of exchange shall obtain
a license
from the Secretary and shall be subject to the regulations
enabling the
Government to obtain information required under subtitle A
(relating to
income taxes) as the Secretary shall prescribe.
(b) Penalty for failure to obtain license.
For penalty for failure to obtain the license as provided for
in this
32
section, see section 7231."

Wow, what an admission that the regulations must be
present that enables the Government to
do what they have to do. Not only that, I ask the question,
What is a bill of exchange? The federal
Reserve note is a "bill of exchange" in commercial law and
you can find a multitude of books of
commercial law on this subject proving it to be so.
Now section 7231 is in Chapter 75 Crimes and forfeitures.
So knowing that the statute you
violated has no penalties it tells you to "see section 7231."
Does 26 USC 6001, 6011, 6012 have
these words directing you to the penalty statute? NO! So
here is 7231:
"Sec. 7231. Failure to obtain license for collection of foreign
items. Any person required by
section 7001 (relating to collection of certain foreign items)
to obtain a license who knowingly
undertakes to collect the payments described in section
7001 without having obtained the license
therefore, or without complying with the REGULATIOS
prescribed under section 7001, shall
be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof,
shall be fined not more than $5,000, or
imprisoned not more than one year, or both."
I emphasized REGULATIONS because that is what is
needed. So looking at
the Parallel Table of authorities we see the following:
26 USC CFR
6901 27 Part 70
7011 27 Parts 19, 22, 25, 70, 194, 270, 285, 290
7025 27 Part 197
There is no Statute 7001 nor a regulation, yet the statute
33
specifically states a regulation shall be

promulgated. Why doesn't 6001, 6011 and 6012 say there
must be a promulgated regulation like
the above statute? If the prosecution would bring forth the
regulation when demanded what would
it show? Would it show that there is none? Would it show,
that if it was, it was sandwiched
between all BATF Title 27 Statutes? Would the simple
asking of the court that the prosecutor must produce the
regulation destroy the case against you because under the
Statutes, 6301, 6331-
6343, 6651, and all the penalty statutes in the 7000 series
sections are all AFT Title 27 CFR regs
as listed in the LSA and the parallel Table of Authorities?
of Subpart B--DEFINITIONS. Section 72.11
"Commercial crimes. Any of the following types of crimes
(Federal or State): Offenses against
the revenue laws; burglary; counterfeiting; forgery;
kidnapping; * * * and use of marihuana will
be treated as if such were commercial crime."
Notice how nicely "revenue laws" is defined as a
commercial crime. Do you have a contract or
"license" such as stated in 7001 to be charged with an
"income tax" crime in Chapter 75? Is that
ever brought up in a tax case?. From 15A
Am.Jur.2d, 368-369 (1998), COMMERCE, § 36:
In view of the Supreme Court's refusal to fix an arbitrary
rule as to what constitutes commerce
subject to the power of Congress, it is not surprising that
there are some inconsistencies in the cases dealing with the
question as to what constitutes a subject of commerce.
Thus, there is a possible conflict between earlier cases
holding certain matters not to be subjects of
interstatecommerce and later cases holding related matters
to be subjects of interstate commerce, although the earlier
cases have not necessarily been specificallly overruled. For
34
example, while it was formerly held that insurance

transactions when carried on across state lines did not
constitute interstate commerce, a later decision held that
the business of insurance when transacted betweenan
insurer and an insured in different states did constitute
interstate commerce. ...
ARGUMENT:
a penalty statute cannot be applied unless violate another
statute that specifically states that penalty
statute.
Example #1
Title 18 USC Section 842. This section starts out with "(a) It
shall be unlawful for any person---."
It is so long that you have to read it for yourself as it is four
columns in Title 18. However, I will quote Title 18 USC 844
which states:
"Penalties.
(a) Any person who violates subsections (a) through (i) of
section 842 of this chapter shall be
fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than
10 years, or both.
(b) Any person who violates any other provision of section
842 of this chapter shall be fined not more than $1,000 or
imprisoned not more than one year or both." It continues
on for three more columns. Here is the statute that you
must violate, laid out in the Penalty Statute describing the
statute that I must violate. Does any of the other penalty
statutes in Title 26 come even close to this?
Yes, and I will provide it for you.
Example #2
"Chapter 72 Licensing and Registration.
Sec. 7001. (a) All persons undertaking as a matter of
business or for profit the collection of foreign payments of
interest or dividends by means of coupons, checks, or bills
of exchange shall obtain a license from the Secretary and
35
shall be subject to the regulations enabling the

Government to obtain information required under subtitle A
(relating to income taxes) as the
Secretary shall prescribe.
(b) Penalty for failure to obtain license. For penalty for
failure to obtain the license as provided for in this section,
see section 7231."
That is an admission that the regulations must be present
that enables the Government to do what they have to do.
Not only that, I ask the question, What is a bill of
exchange? The federal Reserve note is a "bill of exchange"
in commercial law and you can find a multitude of books of
commercial law on this subject proving it to be so.
Now section 7231 is in Chapter 75 Crimes and forfeitures.
So knowing that the statute you violated has no penalties it
tells you to "see section 7231." Does 26 USC 6001, 6011,
6012 have these words directing you to the penalty statute?
NO! So here is 7231:
"Sec. 7231. Failure to obtain license for collection of foreign
items. Any person required by
section 7001 (relating to collection of certain foreign items)
to obtain a license who knowingly undertakes to collect the
payments described in section 7001 without having
obtained the license therefore, or without complying with
the REGULATIOS prescribed under section 7001, shallbe
guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, shall
be fined not more than $5,000, or
imprisoned not more than one year, or both."
I emphasized REGULATIONS because that is what is
needed. So looking at the Parallel Table
of authorities we see the following:
26 USC CFR
6901 27 Part 70
7011 27 Parts 19, 22, 25, 70, 194, 270, 285, 290
7025 27 Part 197
There is no Statute 7001 nor a regulation, yet the statute
36
specifically states a regulation shall be

promulgated. Why doesn't 6001, 6011 and 6012 say there
must be a promulgated regulation like
the above statute? If the prosecution would bring forth the
regulation when demanded what would
it show? Would it show that there is none? Would it show,
that if it was, it was sandwiched between all BATF Title 27
Statutes? Would the simple asking of the court that the
prosecutor must produce the regulation destroy the case
against you because under the Statutes, 6301, 6331-
6343, 6651, and all the penalty statutes in the 7000 series
sections are all AFT Title 27 CFR regs as listed in the LSA
and the parallel Table of Authorities?
Wherefore I must ask the prosecutor to produce the
regulations that I just mentioned.
This be another proof of claim that I demand be brought

forth forthwith or continue to incur more penal damages
payable to me.
I have attached proof of this corporate financial profits for barratry with the Bloomberg stock
quotes for this profit corporation.
Today virtually all courts (except the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania and a handful of others) are
statutory maritime administrative courts (Article IV Territorial) courts. This change in our legal
system was not authorized by the American people. It was created by stealth by the bankers and the
BAR. The BAR also instituted what is known as “case law”. According to Justice John Molloy, the
“case-law system is a constitutional nightmare because it continuously modifies constitutional
intent. For lawyers, however, it creates endless business opportunities. That’s because case law is
technically complicated and requires a lawyer’s expertise to guide and move you through the
system. The judicial system may begin with enacted laws, but the variations that result from a
judge’s application of case law all too often changes the ultimate meaning.”
37
DEFINITIONS:
CREDITOR VS DEBTOR
Creditor: Natural Man/Woman with innate credit, used to provide Surety to a central
bank government through the legal name Trust (Cestui Que Vie trust).
Debtor: Artificial Legal Person, registered subsequent to birth (Birth Certificate) creating
a statutory employee/Bond Servant for the State’s Legal Society.
per·pe·tu·i·ty
/ˌpərpəˈt(y)o͞oədē/
noun
LAW
a restriction making an estate inalienable perpetually or for a period beyond certain limits
fixed by law.
Conclusion:
Due to this factual criminal complaint based upon unrebutted claims and us supreme court
records the entire superior court of california is hereby permanently disqualified from any
further attempts at barratry of franz joseph grey.
Due to the urgency of this situation, I need everyone to cease and desist any further
trespasses against franz joseph grey, sui juris, in my PRIVATE CAPACITY. I urge everyone
to diligently investigate these charges and put an end to these crimes against Complainant
urges you pursue other appropriate orders and proceedings pursuant to your authority
under california as well as federal law, or international law to stop these violations of
california law and perform whatever other steps which are or may be necessary to protect
the republic of california. Thank you in advance for your prompt attention to this
important issue. state of california, city of the Angels THE autograph of franz joseph
grey, PRIVATE CAPACITY, BEING FIRST DULY SWORN AND CAUTIONED, STATES
THAT THE FACTS AND ALLEGATIONS OF THE ABOVE COMPLAINT ARE TRUE TO
THE BEST OF HIS KNOWLEDGE.
38
franz joseph grey

franz joseph grey, Complainant, PRIVATE , All rights reserved
Without prejudice ucc 1-308
on this 18th day of November 2020
witnessed by Rose Marie Welch Grey Tharp

Rose Marie Welch Grey Tharp, Private Side All rights reserved
Without prejudice ucc 1-308
PROOF OF SERVICE
The following and above named
defendants have been served by Fax
at their respective fax numbers on this
18th day of November 2020
William Barr in his private capacity Fax (202) 307-6777

C/O; Nation: “WASHINGTON, DC
39
Department of Justice General-Post Office.

950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Street Address
Washington, DC 20530-0001 United States Minor, Outlying
Islands
XAVIER BECERRA; in his private capacity

● Office of the Attorney General
● 1300 "I" Street
● Sacramento, CA 95814-291
FAX 916-323-5341
● Thomas R. Sokolov in his private capacity
● David Sotelo in his private capacity
● Chestopher L. Taylor in his private capacity
● Eric Charles Taylor in his private capacity
● Sandra Ann Thompson in his private capacity FAX # 562-637-0731 TORRANCE

● Glenda Veasey in his private capacity
● William Glen Willett in his private capacity
● Mark Stephen Arnold in his private capacity
● Laura Conway Ellison in his private capacity
● Brad M. Fox in his private capacity
● Hector Manuel Guzman in his private capacity
● Alan Boyd Honeycutt in his private capacity
● Cary Hiroshi Nishimoto in his private capacity
● Stuart Mark Rice in his private capacity
● Ramona Gail See in his private capacity
● Gia G Bosley acting under in his private capacity

● John Allen Slawson in his private capacity
● Alejandro V
illanueva acting sheriff under COLOR OF LAW in his private capacity
● Mike Feuer, Los Angeles City Attorney acting under COLOR OF LAW in his private capacity
● Fax # 213 978-8216
● Jackie Lacey, Los Angeles District Attorney acting under COLOR OF LAW in his private
capacity Fax # (213) 633-0904
● State of California Superior Court,

Los Angeles County - Torrance, CA
40
Southwest District
Torrance Courthouse FAX # 562-637-0731
825 Maple Ave.
Torrance, CA 90503
franz joseph grey

franz joseph grey, Complainant, PRIVATE , All rights reserved
Without prejudice UCC 1-308
witnessed by Rose Marie Welch Grey Tharp

Rose Marie Welch Grey Tharp, Private Side All rights reserved
Without prejudice UCC 1-308
Menu Search Bloomberg Sign In Subscribe
LIVE NOW
Bloomberg New Economy Forum Watch
Quick Links Stocks Currencies Commodities Rates & Bonds Sectors Watchlist
RECENTLY VIEWED COMPANIES
NIO INC - ADR LUCIRA HEALTH LUCKIN COFFE- TESLA INC MODERNA INC
38.00 INC ADR 452.22 89.49
-1.40 Private Company 4.10 +10.61 -3.66
-0.05
California Superior Court

The California Superior Court is the general jurisdiction trial court for the State of California. The Court has jurisdiction to hear all criminal and civil matters and
there is one superior court for each county.
CURRENT PRICE
0710497D:US USD SEE QUOTE
SECTOR INDUSTRY SUB INDUSTRY FOUNDED ADDRESS PHONE

-- -- -- -- Sacramento County Courthouse 720 Ninth Street Sacramento, CA 95814 United States --
WEBSITE NO. OF EMPLOYEES

-- --
x
Would you move to Tallahassee to make more money? Find
your next career move with the new Bloomberg Work Wise.
Let's go
Press Releases
Adamas Reports Third Quarter 2020 Financial Results
Nov 5, 2020
Adamas announces settlement agreement of previously disclosed class action litigation

Nov 2, 2020
Whalen v. Facebook, California Superior Court, San Mateo County

Aug 12, 2020
Captor Capital Announces Delay in Filing Annual Financial Statements and Responds to Filing of Civil Complaint
Jul 10, 2020
First Subpoenas Issued in Spam Email Pump & Dump Lawsuit Against Xumanii and Publishers of "Awesome Penny
Stocks" and "Select
May 19, 2013
Michael Parodi Resigns as Chief Executive Officer of Tegal

Mar 3, 2005
Riverstone Networks Agrees in Principle to Settle Derivative

May 12, 2004
MILBERG WEISS BERSHAD HYNES & LERACH LLP: LAWSUIT TO MOVE x
Nov 12, 1999 Would you move to Tallahassee to make more money? Find
VIVUS RESPONDS TO SHAREHOLDER LAWSUIT
Mar 5, 1998
Let's go
COHEN, MILSTEIN, HAUSFELD & TOLL, P.L.L.C. FILES CLASS ACTION

Mar 4, 1998
VIEW LESS 4
Executives
NAME/TITLE
Hon Mary C Wickham

Commissioner
Hon Harry J Tobias

Presiding Judge
Hon Alan V Pineschi

Presiding Judge
VIEW LESS 4
VIEW LESS 4
Most Popular
N3IA:GR
NIO INC - ADR
38.00 EUR -1.40 -3.55%
1640892D:US
LUCIRA HEALTH INC
Private Company
LC0A:GR
LUCKIN COFFE ADR
4.10 EUR -0.05 -1.20%
TSLA:US
TESLA INC x
451.53 USD +9.92 +2.25%
MRNA:US
MODERNA INC
89.48 USD -3.67 -3.94%
Let's go
Earn 20K Bonus Points. $0 Annual Fee. Terms Apply.

Wells Fargo Propel® Card | Sponsored
Celebrity Trainer: "I Feel Better At 60 Than I Did At 40, Thanks To These 4 Foods"
PowerLife by Tony Horton: Foundation Four Supplements | Sponsored
California Launches New Practice For Cars Used Less Than 50 Miles/Day
Smart Lifestyle Trends | Sponsored
This Is How Homeowners Are Getting Insured For $25

Lemonade.com | Sponsored
Amend the Constitution to Prevent Another Trump

Bloomberg
Trump Could Lose Far More Than the White House

Bloomberg
Our $5 Wines Are Better Than Most $50 Wines

Firstleaf | Sponsored
Natural Gas on Verge of Multiyear Bull Run: Equinor's Potter
x
Bloomberg
yourPennsylvania
Trump Law Firm Withdraws From next career move with the
Election new Bloomberg Work Wise.
Case
Bloomberg
Let's go
CALIFORNIA: Big News For Autos Used Less Than 59 Miles/Day
Best And Proven | Sponsored
Put your
investments
to work.
Citi® Wealth Builder
matches your goals with
professionally managed
portfolios.
Helping you find new

ways to grow.
Get started
INVESTMENTS: NOT FDIC INSURED •

NO BANK GUARANTEE • MAY LOSE VALUE
People Also Search For
DM1:IND
Generic 1st 'DM' Future
29,810.00 USD +90.00 +0.30%
ES1:IND
Generic 1st 'ES' Future
3,605.50 USD -1.25 -0.03%
INDU:IND
DJIA
29,890.53 USD +107.18 +0.36%
NQ1:IND
Generic 1st 'NQ' Future
11,923.25 USD -51.75 -0.43%
CL1:COM
WTI Crude x
41.90 USD/bbl. +0.47 +1.13% Would you move to Tallahassee to make more money? Find
More From The Financial Web
Let's go
Millionaire Investor Alerts: “Get out of Cash Now”
Stansberry Research
Buying Tesla? Wait Until You Read This...

Empire Financial Research
Top 7 Dividend Stocks To Buy And Hold Into Eternity

MarketBeat.com
Want your dream home? Start with a dream mortgage

NerdWallet
Motley Fool Issues Rare “All In” Buy Alert

The Motley Fool
Man Who Predicted the ’08 Crash Says to Buy “WFH” Stocks Now
Altimetry
SBA Lending Technology for Banks | PPP, Forgiveness, 7(a)

Biz2X
10 Credit Cards You Should Not Ignore If You Have Excellent Credit
NerdWallet
Unbelievable: The Truth About Financial Advisors

smartasset
Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Info (California) Trademarks Privacy Policy
©2020 Bloomberg L.P. All Rights Reserved x
Careers Made in NYC Advertise Ad Choices Contact Us Help
Let's go
TIA BLE
O
O N-NEG
N
R V ALUE T
P TE D FO AYMEN
P
ACCE ED FOR ______
OV ___
APPR _ ______
________
ND ALL
_ A
_________ TM ENT
_ ESEN
_________ S PR A NCE
_ I D
AL U E TH ED A CCOR
V T IN
E D FOR RELA D BACK, JOINT
PT N E
ACCE RONT
A
H E D H OUS
F T
M ENTS W ITH 3 -419AN
D ORSE C O DE O F CEE DS,
EN
ER CI AL
TIO N 192 ALLPRO
M
RM COM R E SOLU ELEASE TS T TO ME
UNIFO
L EA SE R CCOUN E COUR
1933 P
U CT S,A OFTH
5, D E R
JUNE PRO HE ORD LY.
S AND
T
EDI ATE
TUR E M
I M
FIX EVY
AND O M L
M P TFR
EXE
P AI D
P RE
Y
P H GRE nt
N Z JOSE grey,age
FRA jo seph 020
ran z 2
By:f Dat e11/ 16/
E
O ABL
TI
-NEG
NON UE
ORVAL T
PTDF P
E AYMEN _____
CE O R ____
AC VEDF
____
AP PRO
______
RELATEDE
_ L H F
_______ A NDALEWI THT 192O
__ NT C ON S
UTI
_____ NTME CORDAN ESOL NT
____
_ _
PR E
ES I N AC N
IT R
,ACCOU Y .
____
_
UETHIS
BACK, USEJ O
DUCTS EDI ATEL
AL D HO PRO EI MM
DFORV RONTAN 19AND EEDS, O M
EPTE TSF 3-4 PROC URTT
ACC SEMEN LCODE SEAL L
HEC
T
O
OR C A
I EA OF
END MMER ASEREL RDER
RMCO 33PL E THEO
M LEVY
FO 9 ND O
UNI NE5, 1
URE
SA MPT
FR
U
J FX
IT EXE
AND AID
PREP
Y
P HGRE ent
E
OS gr ag
,
NZJ ey
A
FR j h
ep 2020
zos /
f e1116/
ran
By: Dat
LIVE NOW
38.00 INC ADR 452.22 89.49
-1.40 Private Company 4.10 +10.61 -3.66
-0.05
Adam Y Chang
Judge, California Superior Court
CURRENT POSITION TENURE AT CURRENT POSITION PREVIOUS POSITION
Judge, California Superior Court 8/2020-PRESENT Deputy District Attorney, Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office
EDUCATION BOARD MEMBERSHIPS INDUSTRY
Loyola Law School-Los Angeles -- --

University of Southern California
CURRENT PRICE

Learn More
Career History
TITLE COMPANY TENURE
Judge California Superior Court 08/2020–PRESENT
Deputy District Attorney Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office 01/2007–12/2014
Education
DEGREE INSTITUTION
JD Loyola Law School-Los Angeles
DOCTORAL University of Southern California
About California Superior Court

PHONE WEBSITE
PHONE WEBSITE
SECTOR INDUSTRY SUB INDUSTRY FOUNDED ADDRESS
-- -- -- -- Sacramento County Courthouse 720 Ninth Street Sacramento, CA 95814 United States -- --
NO. OF EMPLOYEES
--
MORE INFO 3
Most Popular
N3IA:GR
NIO INC - ADR
38.00 EUR -1.40 -3.55%
1640892D:US
LUCIRA HEALTH INC
Private Company
LC0A:GR
LUCKIN COFFE ADR
4.10 EUR -0.05 -1.20%
TSLA:US
TESLA INC
451.53 USD +9.92 +2.25%
MRNA:US
MODERNA INC
89.48 USD -3.67 -3.94%
Born Billionaires: She is Set to Inherit One of the Biggest Brands in America
investing.com | Sponsored
David Muir Is Happily Married To His Partner

Daily Finance Stories | Sponsored
7 Mistakes You'll Make Hiring A Financial Advisor

SmartAsset | Sponsored
CALIFORNIA: Big News For Autos Used Less Than 59 Miles/Day
Americans In California With Credit Card Debt Could Be In For A Big Surprise
Weekly Financial Solutions | Sponsored
If Your Dog Eats Dry Food, Do This Everyday

Ultimate Pet Nutrition Nutra Thrive Supplement | Sponsored
Netflix Cancellations And Renewals: Effective Immediately

thedelite.com | Sponsored
Holiday Wines Are Here And Cheaper Than You Think

Firstleaf | Sponsored

Bloomberg

Bloomberg
Triple-Layer Protection That Feels Like Wearing Nothing At All

Space Masks | Sponsored
California Launches New Guidelines For Cars Used Less Than 50 Miles/Day
One Little-Known Tech Stock to Invest in Now
The Motley Fool | Sponsored
You May Like

by Taboola
Stephen Hoge
President, Moderna Inc
Tal Zaks
Chief Medical Officer, Moderna Inc
Scott W Wine
Chairman/CEO, Polaris Inc
Steve Owens
Managing Director/Co-Founder, Staple Street Capital
Hootan Yaghoobzadeh

©2020 Bloomberg L.P. All Rights Reserved
NIO INC - ADR LUCKIN COFFE- TESLA INC LUCIRA HEALTH MODERNA INC
40.00 ADR 441.61 INC 93.15
+0.60 4.14 +33.52 Private Company -4.80
-0.01
Gia G Bosley
CURRENT POSITION TENURE AT CURRENT POSITION PREVIOUS POSITION EDUCATION BOARD MEMBERSHIPS INDUSTRY
Judge, California Superior Court PRESENT -- -- -- --
CURRENT PRICE

Career History
Judge California Superior Court PRESENT

SECTOR INDUSTRY SUB INDUSTRY FOUNDED ADDRESS PHONE WEBSITE

-- -- -- -- Sacramento County Courthouse 720 Ninth Street Sacramento, CA 95814 United States -- --
NO. OF EMPLOYEES
--
MORE INFO 3
Most Popular
N3IA:GR
NIO INC - ADR
40.00 EUR +0.60 +1.52%
LC0A:GR
LUCKIN COFFE ADR
4.14 EUR -0.01 -0.24%
TSLA:US
TESLA INC
441.61 USD +33.52 +8.21%
1640892D:US
LUCIRA HEALTH INC
Private Company
MRNA:US
MODERNA INC
93.15 USD -4.80 -4.90%
The 23 Highest Rated Gifts For 2020

Trendysavings | Sponsored
Tesla CEO Is Contributing to a $1 Billion Investment In This New Technology

California Launches New Practice For Cars Used Less Than 50 Miles/Day
Triple-Layer Protection That Feels Like Wearing Nothing At All

Omaha legend puts $91 billion on one 5G stock

How Can You Save on Foreign Transaction Fees? See Top Cards
NerdWallet | Sponsored
28-Day Plan to Force Ketosis (Best For Beginners)

Konscious Keto Meal Plan | Sponsored
Manage Diabetes With This Slim, Water-Resistant Wearable

Dexcom | Sponsored

Bloomberg

Bloomberg
At 56, Laura Ingraham Has Never Been Married And Now We Know Why
Daily Sport X | Sponsored
7 Mistakes That Can Ruin Your Retirement

SmartAsset | Sponsored
Natural Gas on Verge of Multiyear Bull Run: Equinor's Potter

Bloomberg
What Frightens the World's Most Powerful Central Bankers

Bloomberg
Don't Buy Furniture Until You See This Site
Wayfair | Sponsored Shop Now
Skip The Chiropractor & Do This For Neck & Shoulder Pain
Neck Relax | Sponsored
She's Going to Love This

Simply Blessed | Sponsored
You May Like
The 23 Highest Rated Gifts For 2020
Trendysavings | Sponsored
Exceptionally Comfortable. Same Day Shipping for California

by Taboola
Stephen Hoge
Tal Zaks
Scott W Wine
Steve Owens
Hootan Yaghoobzadeh

Menu Search
THE PURSUIT IS ON Bloomberg Sign In Subscribe
NIO INC - ADR TESLA INC MODERNA INC NEWSMAX MEDIA INC LUCKIN COFFE ADR
40.20 441.61 93.15 Private Company 4.08
+0.80 +33.52 -4.80 -0.07
Mark S Arnold
CURRENT POSITION TENURE AT CURRENT POSITION PREVIOUS POSITION EDUCATION BOARD MEMBERSHIPS INDUSTRY
Judge, California Superior Court PRESENT -- -- -- --
CURRENT PRICE
Advertisement
Career History
Judge California Superior Court PRESENT

The California Superior Court is the general jurisdiction trial court for the State of California. The Court has jurisdiction to hear all criminal and civil matters and there is one superior
court for each county.
SECTOR INDUSTRY SUB INDUSTRY FOUNDED ADDRESS PHONE WEBSITE NO. OF EMPLOYEES
-- -- -- -- Sacramento County Courthouse 720 Ninth Street Sacramento, CA 95814 United States -- -- --
MORE INFO 3
Most Popular
N3IA:GR
NIO INC - ADR
39.60 EUR +0.20 +0.51%
TSLA:US
TESLA INC
441.61 USD +33.52 +8.21%
MRNA:US
MODERNA INC
93.15 USD -4.80 -4.90%
204159Z:US
NEWSMAX MEDIA INC
Private Company
LC0A:GR
LUCKIN COFFE ADR
4.08 EUR -0.07 -1.69%
Bo Derek Photos That Nearly Went Too Far - Take A Look

Mentertained | Sponsored
"She Was The Love Of My Life" At Almost 66 Kevin Costner Confirm Rumors of Decades
Trivia.com | Sponsored
Tesla CEO Is Contributing to a $1 Billion Investment In This New Technology

At 56, Laura Ingraham Has Never Been Married And Now We Know Why
Free Hub | Sponsored
After 13 Years Of Working At CNN, This is Don Lemon's Annual Salary

Her Dress Went Down In ACM History

Livingly | Sponsored
California Launches New Guidelines For Cars Used Less Than 50 Miles/Day
Megan Fox's Cheerleader Photos Are Jaw-Dropping

Upbeat News | Sponsored

Bloomberg
Trump Law Firm Withdraws From Pennsylvania Election Case

Bloomberg
Barbara Walters Is 91 - Take A Deep Breathe Before You See What She Looks Like Now
Financial Golds | Sponsored

How Amal Clooney Looks Without Makeup Is Tough To Handle

Loan Insurance Wealth | Sponsored
What Frightens the World's Most Powerful Central Bankers
Bloomberg
Dollar Safe Haven Surge Now Far Less Likely: Rabobank’s Foley
Bloomberg
Try Not To Gasp When You See Amal Clooney Without Makeup
Pay Day Ville | Sponsored
Remember Her? Sit Down Before You See Her Now At 48

The Chef Pick | Sponsored
After Céline Dion's Major Weight Loss, She Confirms What We Suspected All Along
Zen Herald | Sponsored
You May Like

Bo Derek Photos That Nearly Went Too Far - Take A Look
Mentertained | Sponsored
"She Was The Love Of My Life" At Almost 66 Kevin Costner Confirm Rumors of Decades
Trivia.com | Sponsored
by Taboola

Stephen Hoge
Tal Zaks
Scott W Wine
Steve Owens
Hootan Yaghoobzadeh

LIVE NOW
38.00 INC ADR 452.22 89.49
-1.40 Private Company 4.10 +10.61 -3.66
-0.05
Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles

Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles operates as a judicial system for the Los Angeles County. The Court's case areas include appellate, civil,
criminal, family law, juvenile, mental health, probate, small claims, and traffic.
CURRENT PRICE
0227477Z:US USD SEE QUOTE
SECTOR INDUSTRY SUB INDUSTRY FOUNDED ADDRESS PHONE WEBSITE

-- -- -- -- 210 West Temple Street Los Angeles, CA 90012 United States -- www.lasuperiorcourt.org
NO. OF EMPLOYEES
--
Learn More
x
Let's go
Press Releases
Prop. 21 Backers File Lawsuit Over Money Laundering by Opponents of Rent Control Measure
Sep 30, 2020
AHF Files Calif. Supreme Court Petition in Hollywood Fair Housing Lawsuit
Jul 30, 2020
ImmunoCellular Therapeutics Announces Settlement of Derivative Action Lawsuit

Oct 16, 2019
VIEW MORE 1
Executives
NAME/TITLE
Hon Lisa B Lench x
Judge Would you move to Tallahassee to make more money? Find
Hon Ronald S Coen
Judge
Let's go
Hon Jose I Sandoval
Judge
VIEW MORE 1
VIEW MORE 1
Most Popular
N3IA:GR
NIO INC - ADR
38.00 EUR -1.40 -3.55%
1640892D:US
LUCIRA HEALTH INC
Private Company
LC0A:GR
LUCKIN COFFE ADR
4.10 EUR -0.05 -1.20%
TSLA:US
TESLA INC
450.68 USD +9.07 +2.05%
MRNA:US
MODERNA INC
90.38 USD -2.77 -2.97%
California: Big News For Cars Used Less Than 59 Miles per Day
Exceptionally Comfortable. Same Day Shipping for California

x
WouldFor
California Launches New Guidelines you Cars
moveUsed
to Tallahassee
Less Than to50
make more money? Find
Miles/Day
Smart Lifestyle Trends | Sponsored your next career move with the new Bloomberg Work Wise.
Let's go
Many failed before. Will you complete the trial?

Hero Wars | Sponsored

Bloomberg

Bloomberg
Over $750 average savings for new customers who save? Wow!
Progressive | Auto Insurance Quotes | Sponsored
Investing as
individual as
you are.
Explore tailored
solutions for your
investing goals.
Helping you find new

ways to grow.
Get started
INVESTMENTS: NOT FDIC INSURED •

NO BANK GUARANTEE • MAY LOSE VALUE
DM1:IND
Generic 1st 'DM' Future
29,798.00 USD +78.00 +0.26%
x
ES1:IND Would you move to Tallahassee to make more money? Find
Generic 1st 'ES' Future your next career move with the new Bloomberg Work Wise.
3,605.50 USD -1.25 -0.03%
INDU:IND Let's go
DJIA
29,901.85 USD +118.50 +0.40%
NQ1:IND
Generic 1st 'NQ' Future
11,934.00 USD -41.00 -0.34%
CL1:COM
WTI Crude
41.88 USD/bbl. +0.45 +1.09%
More From The Financial Web x
Unbelievable: The Truth About Financial Advisors your next career move with the new Bloomberg Work Wise.
smartasset
Let's go
Man Who Called March 2020 Crash Has New Prediction
Empire Financial Research
Millionaire Investor Issues New Alert: Get Out Of Cash Now

Stansberry Research
Man Who Predicted the ’08 Crash Says to Buy “WFH” Stocks Now
Altimetry
Lending Transformed Digitally for Financial Institutions

Biz2X
Motley Fool Issues Rare “All In” Buy Alert

The Motley Fool
Top 7 Dividend Stocks To Buy And Hold Into Eternity

MarketBeat.com
Consolidate Credit Card Debt With a Personal Loan. See Best Rates
NerdWallet
Understand the drivers behind the performance of gold

World Gold Council

x
Let's go

Presiding Judge Ready To Go

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

You might also like

Presiding Judge Ready To Go

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Presiding Judge Ready To Go

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

NOTICE!!!!!!

Kevin C. Brazile, Presiding Judge

Thank you for your assistance.

Franz joseph grey

INVOICE ​ ​Non-Negotiable ​FRANZ JOSEPH GREY​©

​W​illiam Barr​ acting ​under COLOR OF LAW​ ​ in his private capacity

XAVIER BECERRA​; ​ ​ acting under COLOR OF LAW acting

● David Sotelo​ ​ acting under COLOR OF LAW in his private capacity

● Chestopher L. Taylor​ ​ acting under COLOR OF LAW in his private capacity

● Brad M. Fox​ ​ acting under COLOR OF LAW in his private capacity

● Gia G Bosley​ ​acting under COLOR OF LAW in his private capacity

● State of California Superior Court, Los

TERMS AND CONDITIONS:

DESCRIPTION PER INDIVIDUAL ABOVE NAMED DE-

1. US​$ ​< $500,000.00>​ for invalid claim by ‘Statement $500,000.00 1 x $500,000.00

2. US$ ​< $500,000.00t >​ for invalid claim by ‘Statement

3. US$1,000.00 per hour for 400 hours of Authorized

4. US$1,000 for FAX transmission, nunc pro tunc, as per the

5. US$50,000 per day that each proof of claim on any of my $901,000.00​ x

CURRENT DAMAGES $​19,822,000.00

Total due in 7 days. Overdue accounts may incur further charges.

Authorised Representative, All Rights Reserved

UCC § 1-103. Construction of

UCC § 1-105. Severability.

If any provision or clause of the ​Uniform Commercial Code​ or its

does not affect other provisions or applications of THIS COMPLAINT AND

without any compensation, because the

Barr, 952 F.2d. 457, 293 U.S. App. DC 101,

●18 U.S. Code § 4. Misprision

●26 U.S. Code § 7201.Attempt to

●18 U.S. Code § 242.Deprivation

● (a)​A civil action or criminal prosecution that is commenced in a ​State

special agent in the Diplomatic Security Service of the Department of

BRIEF HISTORY OF CRIMES

UNLAWFUL INCARCERATION DUE TO

All Court Cases are civil Tax cases:

using the form 3949 A for failure to report income.

Rule 17; pub 559;

franz joseph grey for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

through manipulation / perversion of language, non-disclosure, fraud, coercion, champerty and

27 CFR § 72.11 - Meaning of

CFR 27 SECTION 72.11

Consider the following facts:

for statutory privileges.

duty, YOU are the one that is to take “back seat.”

information to THE STATE that is attempting to incarcerate you.

1 in 32 Americans is either in prison or on parole or probation.

and therefore, by definition, Political Prisoners. Furthermore, since Political Prisoners

America’s incarceration rate is now 743 per 100k, the

Judge Alger Fee stated it very clearly in the case of US v

crimes" as set out in 27 CFR 72.11 below (in part).

Addiction to narcotic drugs and use of marihuana will be

Court of the United States.

D.C.W.Va., 43 F.2d 847, affirmed Brady v.

COMMERCIAL LAW. A phrase employed to denote those

commercial world, although it has also been stated that

this country, and on such legislation as may have been

OF TITLE, § 6 (most footnotes

INVOICE Non-Negotiable FRANZ JOSEPH GREY©

William Barr acting under COLOR OF LAW in his private capacity

XAVIER BECERRA; acting under COLOR OF LAW acting

● David Sotelo acting under COLOR OF LAW in his private capacity

● Chestopher L. Taylor acting under COLOR OF LAW in his private capacity

● Brad M. Fox acting under COLOR OF LAW in his private capacity

● Gia G Bosley acting under COLOR OF LAW in his private capacity

1. US$ < $500,000.00> for invalid claim by ‘Statement $500,000.00 1 x $500,000.00

2. US$ < $500,000.00t > for invalid claim by ‘Statement

5. US$50,000 per day that each proof of claim on any of my $901,000.00 x

CURRENT DAMAGES $19,822,000.00

If any provision or clause of the Uniform Commercial Code or its

● (a)A civil action or criminal prosecution that is commenced in a State

witnessed by Rose Marie Welch Grey Tharp

William Barr in his private capacity Fax (202) 307-6777

XAVIER BECERRA; in his private capacity

● Thomas R. Sokolov in his private capacity

● David Sotelo in his private capacity

● Chestopher L. Taylor in his private capacity

● Eric Charles Taylor in his private capacity

● Sandra Ann Thompson in his private capacity FAX # 562-637-0731 TORRANCE

● William Glen Willett in his private capacity

● Mark Stephen Arnold in his private capacity

● Laura Conway Ellison in his private capacity

● Brad M. Fox in his private capacity

● Hector Manuel Guzman in his private capacity

● Alan Boyd Honeycutt in his private capacity

● Cary Hiroshi Nishimoto in his private capacity

● Stuart Mark Rice in his private capacity

● Ramona Gail See in his private capacity

● Gia G Bosley acting under in his private capacity

capacity Fax # (213) 633-0904

witnessed by Rose Marie Welch Grey Tharp