Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Book 21 Dec 2023
Book 21 Dec 2023
I
{.. \ 4 I - •,
'I -
I •
.. , f
• .. I \ •
-·., • I ·.
\ ", • , I l
j
J_
.. .
,
'I
\
•
,
• I
•, t •
\ I
, i a '
'
t
o'f .t-JJ
' r
-
-
-)
•
,.
' .
1. . -.Article 301 , UJ1der. part Xtitll Arti-cle 19(1 )(g) under part Ill
efflpowens the tree· ftOw •of ·P,f'Ovides freedom of practice
the stream : .of •. ·trade any occupation, trade or
thrOughOut • the Indian business.
)
)
territory. •
)
) ...... ~ - - ~... . ,.,. . . . . ._.,. ., __. . ....--............,.__.,,,..__..-..........,_,..__.__,___~ _ ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4
....
1>
co
C:
2. Right under article 301 is Right under article 1 9(1 )(g) is
1
1
1
1
::, Q,)
:r
-0 N
(lJ
Constitutional . fundamental right.
.c:
-...,
C
V>
I
.....
·- 3. Rig,ht under article 301 can Right under article 19(1 )(g) are
«>
C
0
0) be claimed by any person. only available to Indian citizen.
a,
(1)
::s be
@J
N
......
(/)
4. Article 302 to 305 imposes Articl:e 19(1 )(g) can
restrictions on Article 301. restricted by the State by virt~
0
0
'°
0 ....
"er
a,
:,
C:
OJ
OJ Although there are some points differences between article 301 and
·-
-c
,::, ..c:
....,
·-u,I ·- article 19(1)(g) but both of them can be said to be interrelated in
:t
cu 0 some aspects because both the articles share similar objective and
0,
C
a,
a,
are supplementary to each other.
@;
N
....
::,
Cl)
iThe State ombaY- V. R. M. D. Chamarbaugwala (1957): the
Supreme Court of India observed that article 301 and artic·le 19(1 )(g)
0
0
are two facets of same thing that is freedom of trade.
'°
0
,......
(1)
::,
-C't,
C:
~utomobile TransQort Lltd vs State of Rajasthan, (1962): articl·e
19(1 )(g) looks at the matter from the point of view of individual rights
(lJ
C" (lJ
·- N
-
"'C
"'C ..c: to carry on their trade or business while article 301 look at the matter
·- I ·-
<.t,
+J
0
from the point of view country's trade and Commerce as a whole .
C'O
C 0,
(1)
-
(1)
N ::J
@; ( /)